Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 37 references

Precision measurement of Cs($nF_J$) quantum defects and calculations of scalar and tensor polarizabilities of the $nS_{1/2}$, $nP_J$ ,$nD_J$ , and $nF_J$ series

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Absolute-frequency measurements of Cesium nF Rydberg transitions, fit to the modified Ritz formula, fix quantum defects and ionization energies below 60 kHz and yield scalar and tensor polarizabilities across the S, P, D, and F series.

desk verdict Solid Cs nF precision spectroscopy with a real but fixable AC Stark calibration caveat; refereeing will add value. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.04057 v2 pith:ZDOVCJRS submitted 2025-06-04 physics.atom-ph quant-ph

Pinrui Shen , Mariusz Pawlak , Donald Booth , Kent Nickerson , Haddad Miladi , H. R. Sadeghpour , James P. Shaffer This is my paper
classification physics.atom-phquant-ph
keywords cesium-133Rydbergseriesquantumdefectsionizationenergyatomicpolarizabilityopticalfrequencycombfinestructurethree-photonexcitation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports absolute frequency measurements of the $|6S_{1/2}, F=3\rangle \rightarrow nF_{5/2,7/2}$ transitions in $^{133}$Cs for $n=28$-$68$, made with a three-photon excitation scheme locked to an optical frequency comb. A global fit to the modified Ritz formula gives the quantum defects of the two $nF_J$ series and ionization energies that agree with the earlier $S$ and $D$ series determinations. The paper then uses these improved energies to build wave functions and compute reduced dipole matrix elements and scalar and tensor polarizabilities for the $nS_{1/2}$, $nP_J$, $nD_J$, and $nF_J$ series. A reader should care because these are the precise energy-level and polarizability numbers that Rydberg electric-field sensors, microwave receivers, and neutral-atom quantum computing platforms rely on.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the modified Ritz formula, which writes each term energy as $E_I - R/[n-\delta(n)]^2$ and expands the quantum defect as $\delta(n) = \delta_0 + \sum_k \delta_{2k}/[n-\delta_0]^{2k}$; the global fit of all measured frequencies to this formula determines $E_I$ and the $\delta$ coefficients. The second half of the machinery is a single-electron, $l$-dependent model potential with core polarization and spin-orbit terms; numerically integrated radial wave functions at the fitted energies produce the dipole matrix elements, and the standard sum-over-states expressions turn those matrix elements into scalar and tensor polarizabilities.

What would settle it

Measure the same transition frequencies with the RF power reduced by at least a factor of two for several principal quantum numbers (e.g., n=40 and n=60) and check that the zero-power intercepts do not change; any n-dependent shift above about 26 kHz would change the reported quantum defects beyond their error bars.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the $nF_{5/2}$ and $nF_{7/2}$ Rydberg series of cesium are now known to better than 60 kHz, and that the resulting quantum defects, with $\delta^{(5/2)}_0 = 0.03341493(18)$ and $\delta^{(7/2)}_0 = 0.03356289(19)$, are accurate enough to reproduce both the new high-$n$ measurements and older low-$n$ data without higher-order terms. The extracted ionization energies, $31406.46775152(25)$ cm$^{-1}$ and $31406.46775146(26)$ cm$^{-1}$, agree with the previous $S$ and $D$ series value. The paper further claims that wave functions computed from these energies yield $D$-$F$ dipole matrix elements matching relativistic many-body calculations and scalar and tensor polarizabilities for $nS$, $nP$, $nD$, and $nF$ states that correct known errors in the $nF_{7/2}$ polarizabilities.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the radio-frequency light-shift measured at n=32 applies unchanged to all other n=28-68 states, since it was not measured level by level; if the shift varies with n, every fitted defect and ionization energy shifts.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Absolute frequencies for $nF_{5/2}$ and $nF_{7/2}$, $n=28$-$68$, are now available at the few-kHz level, roughly two orders of magnitude better than the previous interferometric data.
  • The ionization energies from both F series agree with the S/D value $31406.46775148(14)$ cm$^{-1}$, supporting a single consistent ionization energy across the measured series.
  • The quantum-defect expansion truncated at $k=2$ reproduces all available data within uncertainty, so no higher-order expansion terms are needed at current precision.
  • The computed $D$-$F$ dipole matrix elements agree with relativistic many-body benchmarks for low-$n$ transitions, and the $nF_{7/2}$ scalar polarizabilities correct a previous underestimation.
  • Scalar and tensor polarizabilities for S, P, D, and F states through $n=100$ are tabulated with fit coefficients, so future work can reproduce or extend them easily.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the $n=32$ RF light-shift calibration transfers to all $n$, then the residual per-state systematic is the main next target; measuring a second $n$ at two RF powers would confirm this.
  • The polarizability expansion coefficients in Table IX can be used to extrapolate $\alpha_0$ and $\alpha_2$ beyond $n=100$, where direct measurement becomes harder.
  • Combining the improved fine-structure interval parameters with the model-potential core polarizability offers a route to predicting long-range Rydberg-Rydberg dispersion shifts in cesium.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper reports absolute frequency measurements of the 6S1/2 -> nF5/2,7/2 (n = 28-68) Rydberg transitions in 133Cs using a three-photon excitation scheme referenced to an optical frequency comb. The authors fit the measured frequencies to the modified Ritz formula to determine the quantum defects and ionization energies for both F series. They then use the resulting quantum defects to compute model-potential wave functions, transition dipole moments, and scalar and tensor polarizabilities of nS, nP, nD, and nF series, and compare with prior experimental and theoretical values. The paper also evaluates core penetration and core polarization contributions, parameterizes the fine-structure intervals, and provides an n^-7 expansion of the polarizabilities.

Significance. If the results hold, the manuscript provides the most precise measurements of Cs nFJ quantum defects to date, with sub-60-kHz absolute accuracy, and a comprehensive set of polarizabilities useful for Rydberg sensing and quantum computing. The manuscript is particularly strong in its detailed uncertainty budget, its demonstration of agreement of the two F-series ionization energies with the previous S/D value, and its extensive comparisons with external calculations and measurements. The numerical procedures (Numerov integration, sum-over-states polarizabilities) are standard, and the resulting matrix elements are checked against many-body calculations at low n. The main weakness is the transfer of the RF AC Stark shift calibration from n = 32 to all n, which is not directly verified and could affect the central claim.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. III, paragraph after Fig. 3] This is a load-bearing systematic because the claimed <60-kHz accuracy and the quantum defect fits depend directly on the AC Stark correction.
  2. [Sec. VIII, Table X] This is load-bearing for the polarizability portion of the paper, though not for the F-series measurement itself.
minor comments (6)
  1. [General] There are typographical errors, including 'polrizabilites' in Section VIII and 'truncated after the third term' in the conclusions, which should be 'truncated after the third term in the expansion' for clarity.
  2. [Table II and Abstract] Table II lists the total uncertainty as < 50.0 kHz, while the abstract and introduction state an accuracy of < 60 kHz. Please reconcile these values and clarify which figure includes all systematic and statistical contributions.
  3. [Reference [19]] Reference [19] is cited as 'Phys. Rev. A accepted (2025)' without volume or page numbers. If possible, update the citation to the published version for reproducibility of the nG quantum defects used in the polarizability sums.
  4. [Fig. 6] In Fig. 6, the quantum defects for nS1/2 (~4), nD3/2 (~2.5), and nF5/2 (~0.03) span very different scales. Please clarify the axis scaling or use separate panels to make the trends visible.
  5. [Sec. III, AC Stark correction sign] The text states the measured AC Stark shifts are red shifts and that corrections were applied, but it does not explicitly state whether the corrections are added to or subtracted from the measured frequencies. Please specify the sign convention so the reader can reproduce the absolute frequencies.
  6. [Sec. VIII, Table X] The comparison with ARC version 3.0 is useful, but the discrepancies for nF7/2 polarizabilities are large (e.g., 37F7/2: 3.0014e12 vs 2.3930e12). Please state in the text whether these differences are dominated by the different nF7/2 quantum defects used by ARC, which would help the reader judge the impact of the improved defects.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the absolute-frequency measurements and quantum-defect fits are self-contained, and the derived matrix elements and polarizabilities are openly benchmarked against external calculations.

full rationale

The central measurement is an absolute-frequency measurement of the |6S1/2, F=3> to nF5/2,7/2 series referenced to an optical frequency comb locked to a GPS-disciplined Rb clock. The quantum defects are obtained by a standard nonlinear least-squares fit of these independent frequencies to the modified Ritz formula, so the defects are not defined in terms of the polarizabilities or matrix elements. The wave functions, dipole matrix elements, and polarizabilities are then computed from the fitted quantum defects and model potentials; the paper does not claim these are ab initio predictions but explicitly states they are 'calculated based on the now more accurate set of wave functions' and compares them with external benchmarks such as Safronova et al. many-body calculations, ARC, and Bai et al. measurements. Comparisons of the F-series ionization energy with the authors' previous S/D-series value [10] are a consistency check on an independent dataset, not an input to the F-series fit. The self-citations to [10] supply calibration constants (ground-state AC Stark shift, Rydberg constant, field-compensation method) that are externally anchored measurements, so they are not load-bearing in a circular sense. The assumption that the RF AC Stark shift measured at n=32 applies to all n=28-68 is a systematic-uncertainty extrapolation; it does not make the fitted quantum defects equal to their inputs by construction, though it is a real experimental limitation to weigh in the correctness assessment. Overall, no step in the derivation chain reduces to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The measurement is experiment-driven; the main added values are the fitted quantum defects, ionization energies, and the resulting polarizability tables. The largest unverified premise is the transfer of the n=32 AC Stark calibration to all n. The model potential, spin-orbit operator, and nG defects are imported from prior literature, so they are axioms rather than outputs. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Quantum defect parameters for nF5/2 series = delta0=0.03341493(18), delta2=-0.20036(14), delta4=0.2825(8)
    Fitted to the measured nF5/2 absolute frequencies using the modified Ritz formula (Table III); used for all subsequent wave-function and polarizability calculations.
  • Quantum defect parameters for nF7/2 series = delta0=0.03356289(19), delta2=-0.20289(14), delta4=0.2998(9)
    Fitted to the measured nF7/2 absolute frequencies using the modified Ritz formula (Table III).
  • Ionization energy from F-series fits = 31406.46775152(25) and 31406.46775146(26) cm^-1
    Extracted in the same global fit; the agreement with the S/D series value is an internal consistency check, not an external calibration.
  • Fine-structure interval coefficients xi1, xi2, xi3 = -9.812(26)e8, 3.4(6)e10, -9.8(3.8)e12 kHz
    Fitted to the measured nF5/2 minus nF7/2 intervals using Eq. (6).
  • Polarizability n^7 expansion coefficients eta_i,p = See Table IX, e.g. alpha0(nF5/2): eta0=32.069148(8), eta1=8.8311(14), eta2=-338.71(6)
    Fitted to the authors' own calculated polarizabilities; a compact parameterization, not an independent derivation.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math The modified Ritz formula (Eq. 1) with the quantum-defect expansion (Eq. 2) describes the unperturbed Rydberg series.
    Standard quantum-defect theory; the quality of the fit residuals justifies truncation.
  • domain assumption The reduced-mass Rydberg constant R = 109736.8627304 cm^-1 and the Cs atomic mass from Ref. [16] are correct.
    Used in Eq. (1) to convert frequencies to term energies; taken from standard atomic weights.
  • domain assumption A single Lorentzian fit to each unresolved hyperfine spectrum yields the center-of-gravity frequency with the stated hyperfine uncertainty.
    Hyperfine splittings are smaller than the statistical uncertainty; no resolved hyperfine model is used.
  • ad hoc to paper The RF AC Stark shift measured at n=32 applies to all n=28-68 states.
    The paper states the measured corrections are applied to all states, justified by keeping a similar Rabi frequency, with no per-n calibration.
  • domain assumption The Marinescu et al. model potential (Eq. 4) and spin-orbit operator (Eq. 5) are valid for the Cs core.
    All numerical wave functions and polarizability sums depend on this imported potential and its fitted parameters.
  • domain assumption The nG quantum defects from Ref. [19] are accurate enough for the polarizability sums involving nFJ states.
    nG energies are required in Eqs. (10) and (11) but are not measured in this work.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Precision measurement of Cs($nF_J$) quantum defects and calculations of scalar and tensor polarizabilities of the $nS_{1/2}$, $nP_J$ ,$nD_J$ , and $nF_J$ series." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZDOVCJRS

@misc{pith2026250604057,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Precision measurement of Cs($nF_J$) quantum defects and calculations of scalar and tensor polarizabilities of the $nS_1/2$, $nP_J$ ,$nD_J$ , and $nF_J$ series},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZDOVCJRS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.04057}
}
abstract

In this paper, we extend our recent work on cesium S and D states [Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 233005 (2024)] to the F states. We present absolute frequency measurements of the $|6S_{1/2}, F = 3\rangle \rightarrow nF_{5/2,7/2}(n = 28-68)$ Rydberg series to measure the spectrum of $^{133}$Cs. Atomic spectra are obtained using a three-photon excitation scheme referenced to an optical frequency comb in a sample of ultracold $^{133}$Cs. By globally fitting the absolute-frequency measurements to the modified Ritz formula, we determine the quantum defects of the $nF_{5/2}$ and $nF_{7/2}$ series. The ionization potential extracted for both series from the modified Ritz formula agrees with our measurements based on the S and D series. Fine-structure intervals are calculated and parameterized. The wave functions computed for the energies from the quantum defects are used to calculate transition dipole moments. We compare the reduced electric-dipole matrix elements with available benchmarks and find agreement within the precision of those works. The scalar and tensor polarizabilities of the $nS_{1/2}$, $nP_J$ , $nD_J$ and $nF_J$ series are calculated based on the now more accurate set of wave functions. Moreover, we report the polarizability as a series in powers of the effective principal quantum number and find the main coefficients of the expansion. The results will be useful for calculating properties of $^{133}$Cs such as collision and decay rates, polarizabilities, and magic wavelengths.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.04057 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic of the experiment: (a) The transitions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. An example of a measured spectrum of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. RF field induced AC Stark shift measurement. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Deviations characterized by the experimental uncer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Experimental quantum defects [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The fine-structure frequency separation for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    D. H. McIntyre and T. W. Hänsch, Precision measure- ments of the Rydberg constant, Metrologia25, 61 (1988)

    work page 1988

  2. [2]

    Derevianko, and C

    M.S.Safronova, D.Budker, D.DeMille, D.F.J.Kimball, A. Derevianko, and C. W. Clark, Search for new physics with atoms and molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 025008 (2018)

    2018

  3. [3]

    Scheidegger and F

    S. Scheidegger and F. Merkt, Precision-spectroscopic de- terminationofthebindingenergyofatwo-bodyquantum system: The hydrogen atom and the proton-size puzzle, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 113001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    K. W. Martin, G. Phelps, N. D. Lemke, M. S. Bigelow, B. Stuhl, M. Wojcik, M. Holt, I. Coddington, M. W. Bishop, and J. H. Burke, Compact optical atomic clock based on a two-photon transition in rubidium, Phys. Rev. Appl. 9, 014019 (2018)

    2018

  5. [5]

    A. D. Ludlow, M. M. Boyd, J. Ye, E. Peik, and P. O. Schmidt, Optical atomic clocks, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 637 (2015)

    2015

  6. [6]

    D. Pan, B. Arora, Y.-m. Yu, B. K. Sahoo, and J. Chen, Optical-lattice-based Cs active clock with a continual su- perradiant lasing signal, Phys. Rev. A 102, 041101(R) (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    H. Fan, S. Kumar, J. Sedlacek, H. Kübler, S. Karimkashi, and J. P. Shaffer, Atom based RF electric field sensing, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.48, 202001 (2015)

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    Nowosielski, M

    J. Nowosielski, M. Jastrzębski, P. Halavach, K. Łukanowski, M. Jarzyna, M. Mazelanik, W. Wasilewski, and M. Parniak, Warm Rydberg atom-based quadrature amplitude-modulated receiver, Opt. Express 32, 30027 (2024). 13

    work page 2024

Show all 37 references
  1. [9]

    J. A. Sedlacek, A. Schwettmann, H. Kübler, and J. P. Shaffer,Atom-basedvectormicrowaveelectrometryusing rubidium Rydberg atoms in a vapor cell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 063001 (2013)

    2013

  2. [10]

    P. Shen, D. Booth, C. Liu, S. Beattie, C. Marceau, J. P. Shaffer, M. Pawlak, and H. R. Sadeghpour, Ultraprecise determination of Cs(nS1/2) and Cs(nDJ ) quantum de- fects for sensing and computing: Evaluation of core con- tributions, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 233005 (2024)

    2024

  3. [11]

    Deiglmayr, H

    J. Deiglmayr, H. Herburger, H. Saßmannshausen, P. Jansen, H. Schmutz, and F. Merkt, Precision mea- surement of the ionization energy of Cs I, Phys. Rev. A 93, 013424 (2016)

    2016

  4. [12]

    Šibalić, J

    N. Šibalić, J. Pritchard, C. Adams, and K. Weatherill, ARC: An open-source library for calculating properties of alkali Rydberg atoms, Comput. Phys. Commun.220, 319 (2017)

    2017

  5. [13]

    Robertson, N

    E. Robertson, N. Šibalić, R. Potvliege, and M. Jones, ARC 3.0: An expanded Python toolbox for atomic physics calculations, Comput. Phys. Commun. 261, 107814 (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    Saßmannshausen, F

    H. Saßmannshausen, F. Merkt, and J. Deiglmayr, High- resolution spectroscopy of Rydberg states in an ultracold cesium gas, Phys. Rev. A87, 032519 (2013)

    2013

  7. [15]

    Feng, L.-J

    Z.-G. Feng, L.-J. Zhang, H. Zhang, J.-M. Zhao, C.-Y. Li, and S.-T. Jia, Collisional cross-sections measurement of ultracold caesium Rydberg states, Europhys. Lett.92, 13002 (2010)

    2010

  8. [16]

    Standard atomic weights of the elements 2020, available online at http://ciaaw.org/atomic-weights.htm

    2020

  9. [17]

    Weber and C

    K.-H. Weber and C. J. Sansonetti, Accurate energies of ns, np, nd, nf, and ng levels of neutral cesium, Phys. Rev. A 35, 4650 (1987)

    1987

  10. [18]

    J. Bai, R. Song, J. Fan, Y. Jiao, J. Zhao, S. Jia, and G. Raithel, Quantum defects ofnFJ levels of Cs Rydberg atoms, Phys. Rev. A108, 022804 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    Allinson, L

    G. Allinson, L. A. Downes, C. S. Adams, and K. J. Weatherill, Determination of quantum defects and core polarizability of atomic cesium via terahertz and radio- frequency spectroscopy in thermal vapor, Phys. Rev. A accepted (2025)

    2025

  12. [20]

    Marinescu, H

    M. Marinescu, H. R. Sadeghpour, and A. Dalgarno, Dis- persion coefficients for alkali-metal dimers, Phys. Rev. A 49, 982 (1994)

    1994

  13. [21]

    Aymar, C

    M. Aymar, C. H. Greene, and E. Luc-Koenig, Multichan- nel Rydberg spectroscopy of complex atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 1015 (1996)

    1996

  14. [22]

    P. Goy, J. M. Raimond, G. Vitrant, and S. Haroche, Millimeter-wave spectroscopy in cesium Rydberg states. Quantum defects, fine- and hyperfine-structure measure- ments, Phys. Rev. A26, 2733 (1982)

    1982

  15. [23]

    Fredriksson, H

    K. Fredriksson, H. Lundberg, and S. Svanberg, Fine- and hyperfine-structureinvestigationinthe 52D-n2F seriesof cesium, Phys. Rev. A21, 241 (1980)

    1980

  16. [24]

    M. S. Safronova, U. I. Safronova, and C. W. Clark, Magic wavelengths, matrix elements, polarizabilities, and life- times of Cs, Phys. Rev. A94, 012505 (2016)

    2016

  17. [25]

    Khadjavi, A

    A. Khadjavi, A. Lurio, and W. Happer, Stark effect in the excited states of Rb, Cs, Cd, and Hg, Phys. Rev.167, 128 (1968)

    1968

  18. [26]

    Z. Lai, S. Zhang, Q. Gou, and Y. Li, Polarizabilities of Rydberg states of Rb atoms withn up to 140, Phys. Rev. A 98, 052503 (2018)

    2018

  19. [27]

    J. Zhao, H. Zhang, Z. Feng, X. Zhu, L. Zhang, C. Li, and S. Jia, Measurement of polarizability of cesiumnD state in magneto-optical trap, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.80, 034303 (2011)

    2011

  20. [28]

    J. Bai, S. Bai, X. Han, Y. Jiao, J. Zhao, and S. Jia, Pre- cise measurements of polarizabilities of cesium nS Ry- dberg states in an ultra-cold atomic ensemble, New J. Phys. 22, 093032 (2020)

    2020

  21. [29]

    T. Lei, S. Gu, Z. Weng, and X. Zeng, Measurement of the polarizabilities of n2D Rydberg states of cesium, Z. Phys. D 34, 139 (1995)

    1995

  22. [30]

    W. A. van Wijngaarden and J. Li, Polarizabilities of ce- sium S, P, D, andF states, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 52, 555 (1994)

    1994

  23. [31]

    X. Hou, Y. Wang, W. Su, J. He, and J. Wang, Trap- loss fluorescence spectroscopy of cesium magneto-optical trapwithsingle-photonRydbergexcitationandtheback- ground electric field measurement and regulation, Opt. Express 33, 7081 (2025)

    2025

  24. [32]

    V. A. Yerokhin, S. Y. Buhmann, S. Fritzsche, and A. Surzhykov, Electric dipole polarizabilities of Rydberg states of alkali-metal atoms, Phys. Rev. A 94, 032503 (2016)

    2016

  25. [33]

    J. Bai, Y. Jiao, R. Song, G. Raithel, S. Jia, and J. Zhao, Microwave photo-association of fine-structure- induced Rydberg(n+ 2)D5/2nFJ macro-dimer molecules of cesium, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 023139 (2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    Bhowmik, M

    A. Bhowmik, M. Gaudesius, G. Biedermann, and D. Blume, Double, triple, and quadruple magic wave- lengths for cesium ground, excited, and Rydberg states, Phys. Rev. A110, 043114 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    T. F. Gallagher,Rydberg Atoms, Cambridge Monographs on Atomic, Molecular and Chemical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 1994)

    1994

  28. [36]

    A.A.KamenskiandV.D.Ovsiannikov,Formalapproach toderivinganalyticallyasymptoticformulasforstaticpo- larizabilitiesofatomsandionsinRydbergstates,J.Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.47, 095002 (2014)

    2014

  29. [37]

    Pawlak, E

    M. Pawlak, E. L. Schoen, J. E. Albert, and H. R. Sadegh- pour, Microwave transitions in atomic sodium: Radiom- etry and polarimetry using the sodium layer, Phys. Rev. A 109, 022810 (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.