Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 100 references

Biological Processes as Exploratory Dynamics

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that reliable biological outcomes often come from exploratory dynamics in which repeated failures are followed by a single success, all shaped by the geometric distribution.

desk verdict A useful and honest synthesis of search-and-capture models under one statistical umbrella; the 'unique and necessary' claim is overbroad and the cell-size scaling argument is underdetermined. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.04104 v1 pith:LHX2WD6K submitted 2025-06-04 physics.bio-ph q-bio.CB

Jane Kondev , Marc Kirschner , Hernan G. Garcia , Gabriel L. Salmon , Rob Phillips This is my paper
classification physics.bio-phq-bio.CB
keywords exploratorydynamicsgeometricdistributionmicrotubulesearchandcapturetranscriptionfactorfacilitateddiffusioncell-sizescalingspindleassemblycellularenergetics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Many of the most reliable things cells do, such as separating chromosomes, finding the right gene to switch on, and making proteins without errors, are not driven from initial conditions like a Newtonian system. The paper hypothesizes that for any biological process where the final state, not the starting state, is what matters, biology uses exploratory dynamics: repeated abortive trials that are discarded until a trajectory succeeds. Working through models of microtubule search for kinetochores and transcription factors searching for binding sites, the authors show that all these processes share one statistical structure, the geometric distribution, in which each trajectory is a run of failures followed by a final success. If the hypothesis holds, exploratory dynamics deserves a place alongside deterministic and stochastic dynamics as a general biological strategy, with testable consequences for how fast cells can search, how they tune their search parameters, and how much energy the searches cost.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the geometric distribution $p_i=(1-f_r)^i f_r$, the probability that a trajectory consists of $i$ failed attempts followed by one success. Repeatedly, the paper sums $\sum_i i x^i$ using the derivative trick $x\frac{d}{dx}\frac{1}{1-x}$ to convert this distribution into mean search times. The geometry enters through $f_r$: for microtubules it is the fraction of solid angle pointing at the kinetochore, $f_r=a/4\pi R^2$, and the survival probability through a growth episode is $e^{-k_c\tau}$; for transcription factors it is the fraction of the genome explored in one sliding episode, $p=\sqrt{D_{1D}\tau_{1D}}/L_{\rm genome}$. The search-time expressions then depend on the length scale $\lambda=v/k_c$, the typical distance a microtubule grows before a catastrophe.

What would settle it

Measure the full distribution of failed microtubule growth episodes before first kinetochore attachment in living cells; exploratory dynamics predicts a geometric distribution of failure counts, so a distribution that is not geometric would falsify the shared statistical claim. A direct test of the scaling claim would measure average spindle assembly time in reconstituted extracts over a range of vesicle sizes while counting microtubule number, asking whether the constant search time predicted by $\lambda\propto R$, $N\propto R^2$ actually holds.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that biology repeatedly solves final-state problems by generating random trajectories, selecting the successful subset, and discarding the rest, rather than by computing a deterministic path from initial conditions. The paper formalizes this as a statistical mechanics of exploratory trajectories whose probability is always $p_i = (1-f_r)^i f_r$: $i$ failed steps, each with probability $1-f_r$, followed by one success with probability $f_r$. For chromosome capture, the success probability is $f_r e^{-k_c d/v}$ in the three-dimensional model, giving an average search time $\langle t\rangle = (1/k_c)(e^{k_c\tau}/f_r - 1)$, and for transcription factor search the same geometric structure yields a total search time minimized when the one-dimensional and three-dimensional exploration times are equal, $\tau_{1D}=\tau_{3D}$. The paper also derives from this framework the scaling rules needed to make search time independent of cell size and estimates the energetic cost of exploratory search against the cell's overall power budget.

Load-bearing premise

The cell-size scaling conclusions assume that, although the search model overpredicts measured absolute search times by a wide margin, its predicted dependence of search time on cell size is still accurate enough to impose scaling laws on microtubule number, catastrophe rate, and growth speed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Chromosome capture and transcription factor search, despite involving different molecules, obey the same geometric-distribution statistics, so the same mathematical machinery yields their mean search times.
  • For chromosome capture, the minimum search time is achieved near $k_c \approx 1/\tau$ when the fraction of right-directed growth is small, a testable design rule.
  • For transcription factor search, the minimum search time occurs when $\tau_{1D}=\tau_{3D}$, and this optimum does not depend on the genome-exploration parameter $\alpha$.
  • To keep search time independent of cell size, the model requires $N\propto R^2$ and $\lambda=v/k_c\propto R$, which the cited experiments on spindle scaling appear to satisfy.
  • The estimated energetic cost of exploratory search is tiny compared to cellular maintenance power density, so high-fidelity final-state search is not energetically prohibitive.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The universality claim could be tested by looking at other processes in the paper's gallery, such as antibody repertoire formation or neuronal connection selection, and asking whether their failure counts are geometric; the paper gestures at these examples but does not quantify them.
  • A sharper test of the scaling logic would separate the two proposed scaling laws by varying cell size while holding microtubule number fixed, or vice versa, in a reconstituted system.
  • The paper's comparison with cellular energy budgets suggests an implicit design principle: selection may act on speed and fidelity, not energy, since search costs are negligible; this could guide the construction of synthetic molecular search devices.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a unifying principle, 'exploratory dynamics,' for biological processes that achieve a final functional state through repeated failed trials, contrasted with initial-condition-driven dynamics in physics. It reviews an eclectic set of examples, introduces a zero-dimensional geometric 'wrong-then-right' model, derives mean search times for one-dimensional and three-dimensional microtubule search-and-capture models (Eqs. 27 and 37), uses these results to discuss cell-size scaling of spindle assembly time (Section 4.3) and the energy budget of such searches (Section 4.4), and applies the same reset formalism to facilitated diffusion of transcription factors (Section 5), obtaining an optimal balance of 1D and 3D search times. The central claim is that exploratory dynamics is biology's unique and necessary solution for functions that are defined by their final state.

Significance. If the central hypothesis could be substantiated, the paper would offer a useful unifying statistical-mechanics framework for diverse search and proofreading processes. The manuscript has notable strengths: the derivations of the mean search times are transparent and algebraically correct; the geometric-distribution structure is cleanly exposed in both the spindle and transcription-factor problems; the facilitated-diffusion optimization result, τ1D = τ3D, is elegant and connects to a substantial literature; and the energy-budget comparisons are instructive. However, the quantitative support for the 'unique and necessary' claim is weakened by the circular and underdetermined cell-size scaling argument in Section 4.3 and by categorical wording in the Discussion that outruns what is actually derived. The paper is best read as a perspective with several worked examples rather than as a proof of uniqueness or necessity.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.3, Eqs. (45)-(46)] The cell-size scaling argument is not a unique test of exploratory dynamics. The authors impose the observed size independence of spindle assembly time from [69,70] to derive λ ∝ R and v ∝ R^3, and then cite those same observations as corroboration; this is a consistency check, not an independent prediction. Within the model, the constraint is underdetermined: in Eq. (45), if kc ∝ R^2 and λ ∝ R^p with any p > 1, then R/λ → 0 at large R, so the exponential factor tends to a constant and the search time is asymptotically size-invariant; v ∝ R^{p+2} then describes a family of solutions. The 'the only way' claim in §4.3 is therefore too strong, and the agreement with the experimental scaling v ∝ R^3 does not discriminate exploratory dynamics from other parameter scalings.
  2. [Abstract and §6] The central claim that exploratory dynamics is biology's 'unique and necessary solution' is not derived. The models show that a class of trial-and-error processes can be described by a geometric distribution, but they do not rule out non-exploratory mechanisms, nor do they prove that no other stochastic or deterministic strategy can achieve high-fidelity final-state functions. The abstract appropriately hedges with 'We hypothesize,' but the Discussion restates the claim in categorical terms ('biology's unique and necessary "solution"'). The authors should either soften these statements to an explicit conjecture or supply a formal argument, such as an impossibility or lower-bound theorem.
  3. [§4.3] The authors correctly flag that the search-and-capture model 'predicts search times that are significantly longer than those measured experimentally' (citing [36]). This admitted quantitative failure is load-bearing because the scaling argument assumes that the model's dependence on cell size is accurate enough to impose scaling requirements even though its absolute predictions are not. The manuscript should justify this assumption, for example by showing that the overprediction is a constant factor that cancels in ratios across cell sizes, or by comparing relative search times against data not used to set the scaling.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2] Page 6 contains a duplicated word: 'this paper is is our attempt' should read 'this paper is our attempt.'
  2. [Figure 5 and Figure 9 captions] Both captions state 'τ=v/d=2min'; the text defines τ=d/v after Eq. (19), so the ratio is inverted.
  3. [Eq. (17)] The integrand 'e^{−kct}kctdt' should be typeset as 'e^{−k_c t} k_c t dt' for readability; as written it resembles a product involving a variable named kct.
  4. [Figure 3] The label 'trachael development' should be 'tracheal development.'

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the geometric-distribution models are self-contained, and the §4.3 cell-size scalings are consistency checks derived from an external constraint rather than fits relabeled as predictions.

full rationale

The paper's quantitative core is self-contained. Equation (37) is obtained by summing the geometric distribution with the stated per-trial success and failure probabilities, and Equations (45) and (46) are algebraic restatements using fr = a/(4πR^2) and N independent searches; the transcription-factor search time is the same geometric sum applied to the facilitated-diffusion cycle. In §4.3 the authors impose the experimentally reported size-independence of spindle assembly time and then ask what scalings of λ = v/kc, kc, and N would make the model's search time independent of R. The resulting v∝R^3 (or, with N∝R^2 and constant kc, v∝R) is an output of that constraint, not an input used to fit the constraint, so the comparison to experiments [69,70] is a consistency check or postdiction rather than a circular reduction. The admitted overprediction of absolute search times and the non-uniqueness of the scaling choices (for instance, other λ(R) dependences could also make the exponential factor asymptotically constant) are correctness and underdetermination concerns, not circularity. Self-citations such as [26,27] provide historical framing and are not load-bearing for the derivations. The geometric distribution is presented as the assumed trial structure of the models, not as an independently predicted consequence, so its appearance is definitional to the modeling framework rather than a disguised input-output identity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results do not introduce new physical entities. The models rely on standard geometric-distribution statistics and on simplified descriptions of microtubule and protein dynamics. The scaling arguments in Section 4.3 depend on the assumption that the simplified model's cell-size dependence is trustworthy, notwithstanding its quantitative error.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Each exploratory trajectory is independent and memoryless, with a constant per-trial success probability f_r.
    The geometric distribution p_i = (1-f_r)^i f_r in Section 3 assumes independence and constant success probability; the authors note in Section 6 that memory effects and reinforcement are ignored.
  • domain assumption Microtubule dynamic instability is reduced to two parameters, growth speed v and catastrophe rate k_c, with rescue and regulatory proteins neglected.
    Section 4.3 acknowledges that the four-rate dynamic instability model is reduced to two rates; the cell-size scaling arguments rely on this simplified description.
  • ad hoc to paper The simplified search-and-capture model is accurate enough in its dependence on cell size to derive scaling laws, despite overpredicting absolute search times.
    The authors state the model 'predicts search times that are significantly longer than those measured experimentally', yet use its R-dependence to impose scaling requirements in Section 4.3.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Biological Processes as Exploratory Dynamics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LHX2WD6K

@misc{pith2026250604104,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Biological Processes as Exploratory Dynamics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LHX2WD6K}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.04104}
}
read the original abstract

Many biological processes can be thought of as the result of an underlying dynamics in which the system repeatedly undergoes distinct and abortive trajectories with the dynamical process only ending when some specific process, purpose, structure or function is achieved. A classic example is the way in which microtubules attach to kinetochores as a prerequisite for chromosome segregation and cell division. In this example, the dynamics is characterized by apparently futile time histories in which microtubules repeatedly grow and shrink without chromosomal attachment. We hypothesize that for biological processes for which it is not the initial conditions that matter, but rather the final state, this kind of exploratory dynamics is biology's unique and necessary solution to achieving these functions with high fidelity. This kind of cause and effect relationship can be contrasted to examples from physics and chemistry where the initial conditions determine the outcome. In this paper, we examine the similarities of many biological processes that depend upon random trajectories starting from the initial state and the selection of subsets of these trajectories to achieve some desired functional final state. We begin by reviewing the long history of the principles of dynamics, first in the context of physics, and then in the context of the study of life. These ideas are then stacked against the broad categories of biological phenomenology that exhibit exploratory dynamics. We then build on earlier work by making a quantitative examination of a succession of increasingly sophisticated models for exploratory dynamics, all of which share the common feature of being a series of repeated trials that ultimately end in a "winning" trajectory. We also explore the ways in which microscopic parameters can be tuned to alter exploratory dynamics as well as the energetic burden of performing such processes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.04104 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Gallery of dynamical equations. The defining example of dynamics in physics is the F = ma dynamics of Newton that allows us to solve problems such as falling bodies or planetary motion. The dynamics of chemical reactions is another well established example of initial-condition driven dynamics, in this case showing the dynamics of ligand (red)-receptor (green) binding. The heat equation is a deterministic dynamical e… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison of human-scale dynamics and cellular-scale dynamics approaches to building a railroad between New York City and Boston. In both cases, there is a very specific goal. However, the strategy for achieving that goal is completely different in the human engineering context in comparison with the biological strategy of using stochastic variation and “selection” to achieve exploratory dynamics. The concept of th… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Gallery of exploratory dynamics. Examples from a wide variety of spatial and temporal scales illustrate the way in which the dynamics is characterized by a set of trajectories, all of which repeatedly fail to achieve their function before ultimately succeeding. Each example is explained in more detail in the text [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (14 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Microtubule search for kinetochores as exploratory dynamics characterized by stochastic variation in the dynamical trajectories of the system coupled with selection and stabilization of those trajectories that culminate in attachment to kinetochores [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:f…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Schematic of the process of microtubules searching for chromosomes. (A) Schematic showing how microtubules grow out from the centrosome and then suffer catastrophes. (B) One-dimensional idealization of the process of microtubules searching for a chromosome. We imagine …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Trajectories and weights for one-dimensional model of chromosome search and capture. The index “i” labels the number of times that the microtubule fails to hit the chromosome before its eventual success. The “failed” trajectories are characterized by the fact that the …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Search time as a function of the catastrophe rate for the one-dimensional model of chromosome search and capture. For this case τ = 2 min. on first try and the average time is d/v. To see this limit in practice when kcτ ≪ 1, we Taylor expand the exponential resulting i…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Trajectories and weights for three-dimensional model of chromosome search and capture. Trajectories are labeled by the label n which tells how many failed trajectories there were and the label i which tells us out of the n failed trajectories, how many of them were in …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Optimal search time as a function of the catastrophe rate. (A) Time to capture the chromosome as a function of the catastrophe rate. (B) Plot of the two sides of the equation for the optimal search time (eqn. 40) as a function of the catastrophe rate kc. The parameters…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The geometry of chromosome search and cell size. (A) For a large cell size, the cone of successful directions is characterized by the probability fr = a/4πR2 . (B) For a smaller size, fr is larger. 4.3. Molecular Control of Exploratory Dynamics The description of expl…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The power of biological processes. (A) Comparison of the bioenergetics of exploratory dynamics in chromosome search and capture with other key cellular processes. In each case, the ∆G shows the free energy cost of a unit process such as the addition of a tubulin monom…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Summary of the power required for various cellular processes per volume. The goal of the figure is to compare the cost of microtubule search and capture by exploratory dynamics with the cost of other cellular processes. Note that we use the symbol f for “few” with the…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Searching for a binding site on the chromosome. (A) A particular binding site for a transcription factor controls the expression of some gene of interest and our goal is to replace the simple schematized reaction on the left with a picture of the dynamics that acknowl…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Simple model of combined 1D and 3D transcription factor search for a specific binding site. A transcription factor diffuses along the DNA for an approximate time τ1D after which it falls of the DNA and performs three-dimensional diffusion for a time scale τ3D. The cyc…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Exploratory dynamics of transcription factor search as an example of variation and selection. We can think of transcription factor search as a succession of search events along the DNA, punctuated by reset events of three dimensional diffusion. “Selection” occurs when…
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Estimating time scales of encounters between a transcription factor and the genome. (A) During episodes of 3D diffusion, the transcription factor diffuses through the cellular environment before encountering the genome. (B) Estimating the time scale of diffusion by us…
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Time for a transcription factor to find its binding site in a model of combined 1D and 3D search. The search time is measured in units of the time spent searching in 3D as a function of the relative time searching in 1D to 3D. The parameter α was chosen to have the va…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [36]

    Wollman, E

    R. Wollman, E. N. Cytrynbaum, J. T. Jones, T. Meyer, J. M. Scholey, and A. Mogilner. Effi- cient chromosome capture requires a bias in the ‘search-and-capture’ process during mitotic-spindle assembly.Current Biology, 15(9):828–832, 2005

    work page 2005

  2. [1]

    Simon and Schuster, New York„ 1961

    Albert Einstein and Leopold Infeld.The Evolution of Physics: The Growth of Ideas from Early Concepts to Relativity and Quanta. Simon and Schuster, New York„ 1961

    1961

  3. [2]

    North Holland, Amsterdam, 1986

    SG Brush.The Kind of Motion We Call Heat. North Holland, Amsterdam, 1986

    1986

  4. [3]

    Dover Publications, Mineola, N.Y., dover edition, 2007

    Emilio Segré.From Falling Bodies to Radio Waves: Classical Physicists and their Discoveries. Dover Publications, Mineola, N.Y., dover edition, 2007

    2007

  5. [4]

    Longair.Theoretical Concepts in Physics: an Alternative View of Theoretical Reasoning in Physics

    Malcolm S. Longair.Theoretical Concepts in Physics: an Alternative View of Theoretical Reasoning in Physics. Cambridge University Press„ 2020

    2020

  6. [5]

    Bernard Cohen.The Birth of a New Physics

    I. Bernard Cohen.The Birth of a New Physics. Greenwood Press, Westport, Conn., 1981

    1981

  7. [6]

    Prometheus Books, 2019

    Colin Pask.Magnificent Principia: Exploring Isaac Newton’s Masterpiece. Prometheus Books, 2019

    2019

  8. [7]

    Thorne and Roger D

    Kip S. Thorne and Roger D. Blandford.Modern Classical Physics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 2021

    2021

Show all 100 references
  1. [8]

    C. L. Hueschen and R. Phillips.The Restless Cell: Continuum Theories of Living Matter. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1st edition, 2024

    2024

  2. [9]

    Mechanical Explanation at the End of the Nineteenth Century.Centaurus, 17:58–82, 1973

    M Klein. Mechanical Explanation at the End of the Nineteenth Century.Centaurus, 17:58–82, 1973

    1973

  3. [10]

    A. B. Kudryavtsev, Reginald F. Jameson, and W. Linert.The Law of Mass Action. Springer, Berlin; New York, 2001

    2001

  4. [11]

    Springer International Pub- lishing: Imprint: Springer, 2019

    Martin Feinberg.Foundations of Chemical Reaction Network Theory. Springer International Pub- lishing: Imprint: Springer, 2019

    2019

  5. [12]

    Dover Publications, Mineola, N.Y., 2003

    Jean-Baptiste-Joseph Fourier.The Analytical Theory of Heat. Dover Publications, Mineola, N.Y., 2003

    2003

  6. [13]

    Clarendon Press, Oxford, Eng, 2d edition, 1975

    John Crank.The Mathematics of Diffusion. Clarendon Press, Oxford, Eng, 2d edition, 1975

    1975

  7. [14]

    H. S. Carslaw and J. C. Jaeger.Conduction of Heat in Solids. Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press, Oxford Oxfordshire New York, 2nd edition, 1986

    1986

  8. [15]

    F. M. Richter. Kelvin and the Age of the Earth.Journal of Geology, 94(3):395–401, 1986

    1986

  9. [16]

    Brent Dalrymple.The Age of the Earth

    G. Brent Dalrymple.The Age of the Earth. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 1991

    1991

  10. [17]

    Brent Dalrymple.Ancient Earth, Ancient Skies: The Age of Earth and its Cosmic Surroundings

    G. Brent Dalrymple.Ancient Earth, Ancient Skies: The Age of Earth and its Cosmic Surroundings. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 2004

    2004

  11. [18]

    Lotka.Elements of Mathematical Miology

    Alfred J. Lotka.Elements of Mathematical Miology. Dover Publications, New York„ 1956

    1956

  12. [19]

    Case.An Illustrated Guide to Theoretical Ecology

    Ted J. Case.An Illustrated Guide to Theoretical Ecology. Oxford University Press, New York ; Oxford, 2000

    2000

  13. [20]

    Provine.The Origins of Theoretical Population Genetics

    William B. Provine.The Origins of Theoretical Population Genetics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2nd edition, 2001. 35

    2001

  14. [21]

    Springer Verlag London Ltd., London, 2011

    Nicolas Bacaër.A Short History of Mathematical Population Dynamics. Springer Verlag London Ltd., London, 2011

    2011

  15. [22]

    Chandrasekhar

    S. Chandrasekhar. Stochastic problems in physics and astronomy.Reviews of Modern Physics, 15(1):0001–0089, 1943

    1943

  16. [23]

    D. S. Lemons.An Introduction to Stochastic Processes in Physics. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, 2002

    2002

  17. [24]

    Princeton University Press, Princeton ; Oxford, 2020

    Jimena Canales.Bedeviled: A Shadow History of Demons in Science. Princeton University Press, Princeton ; Oxford, 2020

    2020

  18. [25]

    Penguin Press, New York, 2024

    Nicola Twilley.Frostbite: How Refrigeration Changed our Food, our Planet, and Ourselves. Penguin Press, New York, 2024

    2024

  19. [26]

    and Kirschner M.Cells, Embryos and Evolution

    Gerhart J. and Kirschner M.Cells, Embryos and Evolution. Blackwell Science, Malden, Mass., 1997

    1997

  20. [27]

    Kirschner and T

    M. Kirschner and T. Mitchison. Beyond Self-Assembly - from Microtubules to Morphogenesis.Cell, 45(3):329–342, 1986

    1986

  21. [28]

    von Hippel.On the Molecular Bases of the Specificity of Interaction of Transcriptional Proteins with Genome DNA, pages 279–347

    Peter H. von Hippel.On the Molecular Bases of the Specificity of Interaction of Transcriptional Proteins with Genome DNA, pages 279–347. Springer US, Boston, MA, 1979

    1979

  22. [29]

    R. B. Winter and P. H. von Hippel. Diffusion-driven mechanisms of protein translocation on nucleic acids. 2. TheEscherichia colirepressor–operator interaction: equilibrium measurements. Biochemistry, 20(24):6948–60, 1981

    1981

  23. [30]

    R. B. Winter, O. G. Berg, and P. H. von Hippel. Diffusion-driven mechanisms of protein transloca- tion on nucleic acids. 3. TheEscherichia coli lacrepressor–operator interaction: kinetic measure- ments and conclusions.Biochemistry, 20(24):6961–77, 1981

    1981

  24. [31]

    T. Hu, A. Y. Grosberg, and B. I. Shklovskii. How proteins search for their specific sites on DNA: the role of DNA conformation.Biophys J, 90(8):2731–44, 2006

    2006

  25. [32]

    Conditionalprobabilityasfoundinnature: Facilitateddiffusion.American Journal of Physics, 91(8):653–658, 2023

    O.HachmoandA.Amir. Conditionalprobabilityasfoundinnature: Facilitateddiffusion.American Journal of Physics, 91(8):653–658, 2023

    2023

  26. [33]

    T. J. Mitchison and M. W. Kirschner. Properties of the Kinetochore In vitro. II. Microtubule Capture and ATP-Dependent Translocation.Journal of Cell Biology, 101(3):766–777, 1985

    1985

  27. [34]

    T. E. Holy and S. Leibler. Dynamic Instability of Microtubules as an Efficient Way to Search in-Space.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 91(12):5682–5685, 1994

    1994

  28. [35]

    G. G. Gundersen. Evolutionary conservation of microtubule-capture mechanisms.Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 3(4):296–304, 2002

    2002

  29. [37]

    Heald and A

    R. Heald and A. Khodjakov. Thirty years of search and capture: The complex simplicity of mitotic spindle assembly.J Cell Biol, 211(6):1103–11, 2015

    2015

  30. [38]

    H. C. Berg.Random Walks in Biology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., expanded edition, 1993. 36

    1993

  31. [39]

    Howard C. Berg.E. coli in Motion. Springer, New York, 2004

    2004

  32. [40]

    Ghabrial, S

    A. Ghabrial, S. Luschnig, M. M. Metzstein, and M. A. Krasnow. Branching morphogenesis of the tracheal system.Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 19:623–647, 2003

    2003

  33. [41]

    T. C. Li, T. M. Fu, K. K. L. Wong, H. J. Li, Q. J. Xie, D. J. Luginbuhl, M. J. Wagner, E. Betzig, and L. Q. Luo. Cellular bases of olfactory circuit assembly revealed by systematic time-lapse imaging. Cell, 184(20):5107–5121.e14, 2021

    2021

  34. [42]

    Tonegawa

    S. Tonegawa. Somatic generation of antibody diversity.Nature, 302(5909):575–581, 1983

    1983

  35. [43]

    Podolsky and Alfred I

    Scott H. Podolsky and Alfred I. Tauber.The Generation of Diversity: Clonal Selection Theory and the Rise of Molecular Immunology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1997

    1997

  36. [44]

    Garland Science, New York, 8th edition, 2012

    Kenneth Murphy, Paul Travers, Mark Walport, and Charles Janeway.Janeway’s Immunobiology. Garland Science, New York, 8th edition, 2012

    2012

  37. [45]

    P. A. Prince, A. G. Wood, T. Barton, and J. P. Croxall. Satellite Tracking of Wandering Albatrosses (Diomedea-Exulans) in the South-Atlantic.Antarctic Science, 4(1):31–36, 1992

    1992

  38. [46]

    B. A. Block, I. D. Jonsen, S. J. Jorgensen, A. J. Winship, S. A. Shaffer, S. J. Bograd, E. L. Hazen, D. G. Foley, G. A. Breed, A. L. Harrison, J. E. Ganong, A. Swithenbank, M. Castleton, H. Dewar, B. R. Mate, G. L. Shillinger, K. M. Schaefer, S. R. Benson, M. J. Weise, R. W. H...

    2011

  39. [47]

    Viswanathan.The Physics of Foraging: An Introduction to Random Searches and Biological Encounters

    Gandhimohan M. Viswanathan.The Physics of Foraging: An Introduction to Random Searches and Biological Encounters. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; New York, 2011

    2011

  40. [48]

    R. Kays, M. C. Crofoot, W. Jetz, and M. Wikelski. Terrestrial animal tracking as an eye on life and planet.Science, 348(6240), 2015

    2015

  41. [49]

    Antolos, S

    M. Antolos, S. A. Shaffer, H. Weimerskirch, Y. Tremblay, and D. P. Costa. Foraging Behavior and Energetics of Albatrosses in Contrasting Breeding Environments.Frontiers in Marine Science, 4, 2017

    2017

  42. [50]

    M. A. Hindell, R. R. Reisinger, Y. Ropert-Coudert, L. A. Hückstädt, P. N. Trathan, H. Bornemann, J. B. Charrassin, S. L. Chown, D. P. Costa, B. Danis, M. A. Lea, D. Thompson, L. G. Torres, A. P. Van de Putte, R. Alderman, V. Andrews-Goff, B. Arthur, G. Ballard, J. Bengtson, M....

    2020

  43. [51]

    J. J. Hopfield. Kinetic proofreading: A new mechanism for reducing errors in biosynthetic processes requiring high specificity.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 71(10):4135–9, 1974

    1974

  44. [52]

    J. Ninio. Kinetic amplification of enzyme discrimination.Biochimie, 57(5):587–95, 1975. 37

    1975

  45. [53]

    Hannezo and B

    E. Hannezo and B. D. Simons. Multiscale dynamics of branching morphogenesis.Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 60:99–105, 2019

    2019

  46. [54]

    DeterministicandStochasticRules of Branching Govern Dendrite Morphogenesis of Sensory Neurons.Current Biology, 31(3):459– 472.e4, 2021

    A.Palavalli, N.Tizón-Escamilla, J.F.Rupprecht, andT.Lecuit. DeterministicandStochasticRules of Branching Govern Dendrite Morphogenesis of Sensory Neurons.Current Biology, 31(3):459– 472.e4, 2021

    2021

  47. [55]

    Pergamon Press, Elmsford, N.Y., 1980

    Bernard Osgood Koopman.Search and Screening: General Principles with Historical Applications. Pergamon Press, Elmsford, N.Y., 1980

    1980

  48. [56]

    Wagner, W

    Daniel H. Wagner, W. Charles Mylander, Thomas J. Sanders, and United States Naval Academy. Operations Analysis Study Group.Naval Operations Analysis. Naval Institute Press, Annapolis, Md., 3rd edition, 1999

    1999

  49. [57]

    E. T. Jaynes. Entropy and search theory.preprint presented at the First Maximum Entropy Workshop, 1981

    1981

  50. [58]

    Alfred A

    Stephen Budiansky.Blackett’s War. Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 1st edition, 2013

    2013

  51. [59]

    Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, 1996

    Horace Freeland Judson.The Eighth Day of Creation. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, 1996

    1996

  52. [60]

    C. H. Waddington.O.R. in World War 2: Operational Research Against the U-boat. Elek, London„ 1973

    1973

  53. [61]

    P. C. Bressloff. Queueing theory of search processes with stochastic resetting.Physical Review E, 102(3), 2020

    2020

  54. [62]

    M. R. Evans, S. N. Majumdar, and G. Schehr. Stochastic resetting and applications.J. Phys. A Math, 53:193001, 2020

    2020

  55. [63]

    Vergassola, E

    M. Vergassola, E. Villermaux, and B. I. Shraiman. ‘Infotaxis’ as a strategy for searching without gradients.Nature, 445(7126):406–9, 2007

    2007

  56. [64]

    Loisy and C

    A. Loisy and C. Eloy. Searching for a source without gradients: How good is infotaxis and how to beat it.Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 478:20220118, 2022

    2022

  57. [65]

    Monthiller, A

    R. Monthiller, A. Loisy, M. A. R. Koehl, B. Favier, and C. Eloy. Surfing on Turbulence: A Strategy for Planktonic Navigation.Phys Rev Lett, 129(6):064502, 2022

    2022

  58. [66]

    Blitzstein and Jessica Hwang.Introduction to Probability

    Joseph K. Blitzstein and Jessica Hwang.Introduction to Probability. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group, 2019

    2019

  59. [67]

    Lacroix and J

    B. Lacroix and J. Dumont. Spatial and temporal scaling of microtubules and mitotic spindles. Cells, 11(2), 2022

    2022

  60. [68]

    G. Ha, P. Dieterle, H. Shen, A. Amir, and D. J. Needleman. Measuring and modeling the dynamics of mitotic error correction.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 121(25), 2024

    2024

  61. [69]

    Lacroix, G

    B. Lacroix, G. Letort, L. Pitayu, J. Sallé, M. Stefanutti, G. Maton, A. M. Ladouceur, J. C. Canman, P. S. Maddox, A. S. Maddox, N. Minc, F. Nédélec, and J. Dumont. Microtubule Dynamics Scale with Cell Size to Set Spindle Length and Assembly Timing.Developmental Cell, 45(4):496–+, 2018

    2018

  62. [70]

    E. M. Rieckhoff, F. Berndt, M. Elsner, S. Golfier, F. Decker, K. Ishihara, and J. Brugues. Spindle scaling is governed by cell boundary regulation of microtubule nucleation.Current Biology, 30(24), 2020. 38

    2020

  63. [71]

    L. D. Belmont, A. A. Hyman, K. E. Sawin, and T. J. Mitchison. Real-Time Visualization of Cell- Cycle Dependent Changes in Microtubule Dynamics in Cytoplasmic Extracts.Cell, 62(3):579–589, 1990

    1990

  64. [72]

    Baumgart, M

    J. Baumgart, M. Kirchner, S. Redemann, A. Bond, J. Woodruff, J. M. Verbavatz, F. Jülicher, T. Müller-Reichert, A. A. Hyman, and J. Brugués. Soluble tubulin is significantly enriched at mitotic centrosomes.Journal of Cell Biology, 218(12):3977–3985, 2019

    2019

  65. [73]

    H. Qian. Phosphorylation energy hypothesis: Open chemical systems and their biological functions. Annual Review of Physical Chemistry, 58:113–142, 2007

    2007

  66. [74]

    G. Lan, P. Sartori, S. Neumann, V. Sourjik, and Y. H. Tu. The energy-speed-accuracy trade-off in sensory adaptation.Nature Physics, 8(5):422–428, 2012

    2012

  67. [75]

    Bioenergetics and kinetics of microtubule and actin filament assembly–disassembly.International review of cytology, 78:1–125, 1982

    Terrell L Hill and Marc W Kirschner. Bioenergetics and kinetics of microtubule and actin filament assembly–disassembly.International review of cytology, 78:1–125, 1982

    1982

  68. [76]

    P. J. Foster, J. Bae, B. Lemma, J. J. Zheng, W. Ireland, P. Chandrakar, R. Boros, Z. Dogic, D. J. Needleman, and J. J. Vlassak. Dissipation and energy propagation across scales in an active cytoskeletal material.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 120(14), 2023

    2023

  69. [77]

    Lynch and G

    M. Lynch and G. K. Marinov. The bioenergetic costs of a gene.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 112(51):15690–15695, 2015

    2015

  70. [78]

    Kiewisz, G

    R. Kiewisz, G. Fabig, W. Conway, D. Baum, D. Needleman, and T. Müller-Reichert. Three- dimensional structure of kinetochore-fibers in human mitotic spindles.Elife, 11, 2022

    2022

  71. [79]

    Nanomedicine: Basic Capabilities, Vol

    RA Freitas. Nanomedicine: Basic Capabilities, Vol. 1.Landes Bioscience: Georgetown, Texas, 1999

    1999

  72. [80]

    A proof for the queuing formulal=λw.Operations research, 9(3):383–387, 1961

    John DC Little et al. A proof for the queuing formulal=λw.Operations research, 9(3):383–387, 1961

    1961

  73. [81]

    What is the total number of protein molecules per cell volume? A call to rethink some published values.Bioessays, 35(12):1050–1055, 2013

    Ron Milo. What is the total number of protein molecules per cell volume? A call to rethink some published values.Bioessays, 35(12):1050–1055, 2013

    2013

  74. [82]

    Multitagging proteomic strategy to estimate protein turnover rates in dynamic systems.Journal of proteome research, 9(5):2087–2097, 2010

    Karthik P Jayapal, Siguang Sui, Robin J Philp, Yee-Jiun Kok, Miranda GS Yap, Timothy J Griffin, and Wei-Shou Hu. Multitagging proteomic strategy to estimate protein turnover rates in dynamic systems.Journal of proteome research, 9(5):2087–2097, 2010

    2010

  75. [83]

    Proteome half-life dynamics in living human cells.Science, 331(6018):764–768, 2011

    Eran Eden, Naama Geva-Zatorsky, Irina Issaeva, Ariel Cohen, Erez Dekel, Tamar Danon, Lydia Cohen, Avi Mayo, and Uri Alon. Proteome half-life dynamics in living human cells.Science, 331(6018):764–768, 2011

    2011

  76. [84]

    MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 2010

    Sanjoy Mahajan.Street-Fighting Mathematics: The Art of Educated Guessing and Opportunistic Problem Solving. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 2010

    2010

  77. [85]

    Metabolic engineering: Principles and methodologies

    George Stephanopoulos, Aristos A Aristidou, and Jens Nielsen. Metabolic engineering: Principles and methodologies. 1998

    1998

  78. [86]

    Energy consumption in a cyclic phosphoryla- tion/dephosphorylation cascade.Journal of Biological Chemistry, 259(19):12260–12264, 1984

    E Shacter, P Boon Chock, and ER Stadtman. Energy consumption in a cyclic phosphoryla- tion/dephosphorylation cascade.Journal of Biological Chemistry, 259(19):12260–12264, 1984

    1984

  79. [87]

    Milo and R

    R. Milo and R. Phillips.Cell Biology by the Numbers. Garland Press, New York, NY, 2016. 39

    2016

  80. [88]

    Ciliogenesis: Buildingthecell’santenna.Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 12(4):222–234, 2011

    H.IshikawaandW.F.Marshall. Ciliogenesis: Buildingthecell’santenna.Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 12(4):222–234, 2011

    2011

  81. [89]

    Chien, S

    A. Chien, S. M. Shih, R. Bower, D. Tritschler, M. E. Porter, and A. Yildiz. Dynamics of the IFT machinery at the ciliary tip.Elife, 6, 2017

    2017

  82. [91]

    Kirchhausen

    T. Kirchhausen. Three ways to make a vesicle (vol 1, pg 187, 2000).Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2(3):216–216, 2001

    2000

  83. [92]

    Y. M. Wang, R. H. Austin, and E. C. Cox. Single molecule measurements of repressor protein 1D diffusion on DNA.Physical Review Letters, 97(4), 2006

    2006

  84. [93]

    P. C. Blainey, A. M. van Oijent, A. Banerjee, G. L. Verdine, and X. S. Xie. A base-excision DNA- repair protein finds intrahelical lesion bases by fast sliding in contact with DNA.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 103(15):5752–5757, 2006

    2006

  85. [94]

    van den Broek, F

    B. van den Broek, F. Vanzi, D. Normanno, F. S. Pavone, and G. J. Wuite. Real-time observation of DNA looping dynamics of Type IIE restriction enzymes NaeI and NarI.Nucleic Acids Res, 34(1):167–74, 2006

    2006

  86. [95]

    I. J. Finkelstein, M. L. Visnapuu, and E. C. Greene. Single-molecule imaging reveals mechanisms of protein disruption by a DNA translocase.Nature, 468(7326):983–987, 2010

    2010

  87. [96]

    Hammar, P

    P. Hammar, P. Leroy, A. Mahmutovic, E. G. Marklund, O. G. Berg, and J. Elf. Thelacrepressor displays facilitated diffusion in living cells.Science, 336(6088):1595–8, 2012

    2012

  88. [97]

    Normanno, L

    D. Normanno, L. Boudarene, C. Dugast-Darzacq, J. Chen, C. Richter, F. Proux, O. Benichou, R. Voituriez, X. Darzacq, and M. Dahan. Probing the target search of DNA-binding proteins in mammalian cells using TetR as model searcher.Nat Commun, 6:7357, 2015

    2015

  89. [98]

    Phillips, J

    R. Phillips, J. Kondev, J. Theriot, and H. G. Garcia.Physical Biology of the Cell, 2nd Edition. Garland Science, New York, 2013. (Illustrated by N. Orme)

    2013

  90. [99]

    S. C. Weber, A. J. Spakowitz, and J. A. Theriot. Bacterial chromosomal loci move subdiffusively through a viscoelastic cytoplasm.Phys Rev Lett, 104(23):238102, 2010

    2010

  91. [100]

    Gabriele, H

    M. Gabriele, H. B. Brandao, S. Grosse-Holz, A. Jha, G. M. Dailey, C. Cattoglio, T. S. Hsieh, L. Mirny, C. Zechner, and A. S. Hansen. Dynamics of CTCF- and cohesin-mediated chromatin looping revealed by live-cell imaging.Science, 376(6592):496–501, 2022

    2022

  92. [101]

    D. B. Bruckner, H. Chen, L. Barinov, B. Zoller, and T. Gregor. Stochastic motion and transcrip- tional dynamics of pairs of distal DNA loci on a compacted chromosome.Science, 380(6652):1357– 1362, 2023

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.