Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 136 references

The Near-Centaur Environment: Satellites, Rings, and Debris

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This review argues that the scarcity of satellites around Centaurs compared with Kuiper Belt objects is likely real: the transition from safe trans-Neptunian orbits to planet-crossing Centaur orbits destroys binaries, so the two known…

desk verdict A solid, honest review chapter that earns its keep with a useful homogenized ring table, but its one interpretive claim about binary fractions is more speculative than the prose admits. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.04130 v1 pith:6F5A6MXX submitted 2025-06-04 astro-ph.EP

A.A. Sickafoose , S.M. Giuliatti Winter , R. Leiva , C.B. Olkin , D. Ragozzine , L.M. Woodney This is my paper
classification astro-ph.EP
keywords CentaursTrans-NeptunianObjectsbinaryasteroidsplanetaryringsstellaroccultationsdynamicalevolutionJupiter-familycometsChariklo
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review chapter asks why Centaurs, the planet-crossing minor planets between the giant planets, so rarely show moons, rings, or debris, and whether those absences are real or a trick of observation. The chapter's central claim is that the steep drop in binary fraction from the Kuiper Belt (about 10 percent of hot TNOs, 30 percent of cold classicals) to 0 of 58 observed Centaurs and 2 of 109 giant-planet crossers is likely a real dynamical effect: close encounters with the giant planets break binaries apart. If the claim is right, the two known binary Centaurs, Ceto-Phorcys and Typhon-Echidna, are the fortunate survivors of a much larger original population, and the same destruction process supplies a testable prediction of 'pairs' of objects on nearly identical orbits.

What carries the argument

The comparison rests on the tightness metric $a_b/r_H$, the binary semimajor axis relative to the mutual Hill sphere, which distinguishes 'tight' binaries that can survive encounters from 'wide' ones that are easily disrupted. Around this metric the chapter combines three observational tools: HST direct imaging for binary detection, stellar occultations for rings and debris, and the cumulative binary fractions of dynamical classes.

What would settle it

Re-derive detection limits for all 58 Centaur and 109 GPC Hubble fields, compute bias-corrected binary fractions, and compare with identically-processed TNO fields; if the corrected Centaur fraction matches the about-10-percent hot-TNO value, the decline is mostly bias. Alternatively, discovering a wide Centaur binary with $a_b/r_H > 1\%$ would directly contradict the destruction scenario.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The chapter consolidates the evidence that Centaur-like bodies are transitional objects whose local environment is shaped by destruction, not formation. It argues that the decreasing binary fraction from Cold Classicals (~30%), through dynamically excited trans-Neptunian populations (~10%), to the Centaur and Jupiter-family-comet populations, could very easily be a real effect and not due entirely to observational biases. The two known GPC binaries are tight (semimajor axis well below 1% of the mutual Hill radius), consistent with simulations showing that wide binaries are disrupted by scattering encounters with Neptune, and their survival over tens of Myr is unlikely—yet they exist, suggesting they are survivors of an initial fraction consistent with the source population.

Load-bearing premise

That the Hubble samples of Centaurs and TNOs are comparable enough that the raw detection fractions (0/58 and 2/109 versus roughly 10 percent) can be compared while ignoring detection biases.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the decline is real, the binary fraction acts as a dynamical clock recording the integrated encounter history with the giant planets.
  • The two known GPC binaries are tight, low-probability survivors, implying that most Centaur binaries have already been disrupted.
  • Disrupted binaries should leave 'pairs'—objects on very similar orbits—which have not yet been searched for.
  • Rings around Centaurs may be either primordial objects from the TNO region or generated by the transition; the absence of rings on small TNOs must be checked.
  • Observational biases being what they are, wide Centaur binaries must be rarer than tight ones, consistent with dynamical destruction.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the binary-fraction decline is real, the fraction of Centaurs that are former binary members acting as 'pairs' could be used to estimate the disruption rate and the original binary fraction.
  • The chapter's own call for homogeneous non-detection upper limits implies that archival HST data could be reanalyzed to settle the claim; existing HST data may already contain the answer.
  • The pattern would predict that Jupiter-family comets should have essentially no binaries, which is consistent with current knowledge and testable with future occultation surveys.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This chapter reviews the current state of knowledge on satellites, rings, and debris around Centaurs and Giant Planet Crossers (GPCs). It catalogs the known detections and non-detections, summarizes the observational techniques (stellar occultations, direct imaging, light curves, spectroscopy), compares the properties of these systems with trans-Neptunian binaries and ringed bodies, and discusses formation and confinement mechanisms. A particular strength is the consistent re-derivation of ring optical depths in Table 9.4, with explicit acknowledgment of the gray-screen assumption and the factor-of-two ambiguity in published values. The chapter concludes with a list of open questions and future prospects from JWST, LSST, and ELTs.

Significance. As a review, this chapter is a valuable synthesis of a rapidly evolving field. It provides a convenient, carefully referenced inventory of the sparse detections of satellites, rings, and debris around Centaur-like objects, and it usefully highlights the observational selection effects that complicate population-level comparisons. The consistent optical-depth tabulation is a genuine service to the community. The chapter's interpretive proposal—that the apparent deficit of Centaur binaries relative to TNOs may reflect dynamical destruction rather than observational bias—is an interesting hypothesis, but it is presented with appropriate caveats and is not overstated as a definitive finding. The overall assessment is that the chapter is reliable and informative, with several local issues that should be corrected before publication.

major comments (2)
  1. [§9.3.3] The Roche-limit formula as printed—"a_Roche = (4πABC ρp γρs)^{1/3}"—is dimensionally inconsistent, since it multiplies the primary density by the dimensionless γ and the secondary density rather than dividing by them. The surrounding text (e.g., "γ needs to be low" to push the Roche limit outward) and the standard form in the cited literature indicate the intended expression is a_Roche = (4πABC ρp / (γ ρs))^{1/3}. This typographical error should be corrected, as it directly affects the interpretation of ring locations relative to the Roche limit in Figure 9.7 and the associated discussion.
  2. [§9.2.2 and §9.6.2] The statement that the decreasing binary fraction "could very easily be a real effect" is stronger than the evidence presented. The chapter itself notes that the 0/58 and 2/109 counts come from heterogeneous HST programs with different instruments, filters, and strategies, and §9.6.2 admits that no detailed non-detection upper limits are published for the 109 GPCs. Furthermore, the [68] sample included the known binary Typhon–Echidna without detecting it, demonstrating that the surveyed subset is incomplete for known systems. While the chapter later frames this as speculation, the phrase "very easily" implies a likelihood assessment that the raw counts cannot support. I recommend rephrasing to something like "could be a real effect, but the current heterogeneous observations cannot distinguish this from observational bias."
minor comments (5)
  1. [§9.1.2] The text states that six Centaurs have published stellar occultation results, but the same paragraph adds a third Centaur (2008 YB3) and additional GPCs. Please clarify the count or the classification criteria for this sentence.
  2. [§9.2.2] In the sentence "The two GPC binaries have some of the smallest semimajor axes," the context and Figure 9.6 indicate that the intended quantity is the ratio a_b/r_H, not the semimajor axis itself. Please correct the wording.
  3. [§9.5.2] The sentence beginning "This scenario would require a single Neptune encounter..." contains a comma splice and confusing logic. Please break it into shorter, clearer sentences.
  4. [§9.2.2] The phrase "Ignoring biases and considering simply the frequency" is appropriate for a back-of-the-envelope comparison, but consider moving the caveat about the lack of completeness (from §9.6.2) to this location so that readers immediately see the limitation.
  5. [Table 9.4] In the note for Quaoar Q1R 2021 Aug 27, the explanation of why an infinite optical depth is avoided is clear, but the wording "we use the optical depth because the maximum apparent opacity... returns infinite optical depth a)" includes a stray "a)" that should be removed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the chapter is a review whose interpretive claims are explicitly hedged and whose self-citations point to external published results.

full rationale

This is a review chapter, not a derivation chain. Its central interpretive statement about declining binary fractions is presented as a possibility ('could very easily be a real effect and not due entirely to observational biases') and is immediately preceded by 'Ignoring biases and considering simply the frequency of binary detections versus numbers observed' (Sec. 9.2.2). The chapter itself identifies why that comparison cannot be a forced result: 'Due to the different instrument configurations, filters, and observation strategies, it is difficult to accurately determine the rate of binary systems within the Centaur and GPC populations' (Sec. 9.2.2), and later, 'there are no detailed publications of non-detections or upper limits for binary components around the 109 Centaur-like objects observed with HST' (Sec. 9.6.2). No parameter is fitted and then renamed a prediction, and no conclusion is justified solely by a self-citation. Author self-citations that do appear ([114], [122], [6], [91], [67]) point to published simulations or observations that are external to this chapter; the chapter's synthesis does not reduce to them. Thus no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The chapter rests on published observations and standard conversion formulas. The only hand-chosen parameter entering the displayed analysis is the Roche-limit geometry factor gamma, and the only adopted material parameter is the ring-particle density from Saturn's small satellites. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Geometric factor gamma for Roche radius = 1.6 in Figure 9.7; range 0.85 to 1.6 discussed
    The chapter computes displayed Roche radii adopting gamma = 1.6. This is a chosen morphological parameter, not fitted to data, but it shifts the displayed Roche limit and is not uniquely determined by the occultation measurements.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Gray-screen transmission law T = e^(-tau0)
    Used in Section 9.3.2 and Table 9.4 to convert line-of-sight opacity to optical depth for a polylayer ring.
  • domain assumption Normal optical depth relation tau_N = tau_0 sin|B|
    Adopted from Elliot et al. (1984) to homogenize Table 9.4. The factor-of-two zebra-striped screen correction is discussed separately but not used for nominal values.
  • domain assumption Centaurs defined as q > 5.2 AU and a_sun < 30 AU; GPCs defined as 5.2 < q < 30 AU
    Underlies Tables 9.1 and 9.2 and all binary and ring statistics in the chapter. A different classification would change the counts.
  • domain assumption Roche radius formula a_Roche = (4*pi*A*B*C*rho_p / (gamma*rho_s))^(1/3)
    Used in Section 9.3.3 and Figure 9.7. The results depend on assumed uniform-density triaxial primary and a sphericity parameter gamma, with density choices from the literature.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Near-Centaur Environment: Satellites, Rings, and Debris." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6F5A6MXX

@misc{pith2026250604130,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Near-Centaur Environment: Satellites, Rings, and Debris},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6F5A6MXX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.04130}
}
read the original abstract

The unexpected finding of a ring system around the Centaur (10199) Chariklo opened a new window for dynamical studies and posed many questions about the formation and evolutionary mechanisms of Centaurs as well as the relationship to satellites and outbursting activity. As minor planets that cross the orbits of the giant planets, Centaurs have short dynamical lifetimes: Centaurs are supplied from the trans-Neptunian region and some fraction migrates inward to become Jupiter-family comets. Given these dynamical pathways, a comparison of attributes across these classifications provides information to understand the source population(s) and the processes that have affected these minor planets throughout their lifetimes. In this chapter we review the current knowledge of satellites, rings, and debris around Centaur-like bodies, discuss the observational techniques involved, place the information into context with the trans-Neptunian Objects, and consider what the results tell us about the outer solar system. We also examine open questions and future prospects.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.04130 by the authors.

Figure 9
Figure 9. Example of ring detections from stellar occultation data. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. The binary GPC Ceto-Phorcys observed by HST (Fig. 2 in [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Example of a rotational light curve for the contact binary candidate and Plutino [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Comparison of binary characteristics for Centaur-like objects (GPCs) with other [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Comparison of proposed small-body ring systems: ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Examples of Poincar [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_9.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

136 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [68]

    Hub- ble Space Telescope Search for Activity in High-perihelion Objects

    Jing Li, David Jewitt, Max Mutchler, Jessica Agarwal, and Harold Weaver. Hub- ble Space Telescope Search for Activity in High-perihelion Objects. AJ, 159(5):209, April 2020

    work page 2020

  2. [1]

    Bus, Marc W

    Schelte J. Bus, Marc W. Buie, David G. Schleicher, William B. Hubbard, Robert L. Marcialis, Richard Hill, Lawrence H. Wasserman, John R. Spencer, Robert L. Millis, Otto G. Franz, Amanda S. Bosh, Edward W. Dunham, Charles H. Ford, James W. Young, J. L. Elliott, Richard Meserole, Catherine B. Olkin, Stephen W. McDonald, Jeffrey A. Foust, Lisa M. Sopata, and...

    1996

  3. [2]

    J. L. Elliot, C. B. Olkin, E. W. Dunham, C. H. Ford, D. K. Gilmore, D. Kurtz, D. Laz- zaro, D. M. Rank, P. Temi, R. M. Bandyopadhyay, J. Barroso, A. Barucci, A. S. Bosh, M. W. Buie, S. J. Bus, C. C. Dahn, D. W. Foryta, W. B. Hubbard, D. F. Lopes, R. L. Marcialis, S. W. McDonald, R. L. Millis, H. Reitsema, D. G. Schleicher, B. Sicardy, R. P. S. Stone, and ...

    1995

  4. [3]

    Ruprecht, Amanda S

    Jessica D. Ruprecht, Amanda S. Bosh, Michael J. Person, Federica B. Bianco, Ben- jamin J. Fulton, Amanda A. S. Gulbis, Schelte J. Bus, and Amanda M. Zangari. 29 November 2011 stellar occultation by 2060 Chiron: Symmetric jet-like features. Icarus, 252:271–276, May 2015

    2011

  5. [4]

    J. L. Ortiz, R. Duffard, N. Pinilla-Alonso, A. Alvarez-Candal, P. Santos-Sanz, N. Morales, E. Fern ´andez-Valenzuela, J. Licandro, A. Campo Bagatin, and A. Thi- rouin. Possible ring material around centaur (2060) Chiron. A&A, 576:A18, April 2015

    2015

  6. [5]

    J. L. Ortiz, C. L. Pereira, B. Sicardy, F. Braga-Ribas, A. Takey, A. M. Fouad, A. A. Shaker, S. Kaspi, N. Brosch, M. Kretlow, R. Leiva, J. Desmars, B. E. Morgado, N. Morales, M. Vara-Lubiano, P. Santos-Sanz, E. Fern´andez-Valenzuela, D. Souami, R. Duffard, F. L. Rommel, Y . Kilic, O. Erece, D. Koseoglu, E. Ege, R. Morales, A. Alvarez-Candal, J. L. Rizos, ...

    2022

  7. [6]

    Sickafoose, Stephen E

    Amanda A. Sickafoose, Stephen E. Levine, Amanda S. Bosh, Michael J. Person, Car- los A. Zuluaga, Bastian Knieling, Mark C. Lewis, and Karsten Schindler. Material around the Centaur (2060) Chiron from the 2018 November 28 UT Stellar Occulta- tion. PSJ, 4(11):221, November 2023. 29 30BIBLIOGRAPHY

    2018

  8. [7]

    Braga-Ribas, B

    F. Braga-Ribas, B. Sicardy, J. L. Ortiz, C. Snodgrass, F. Roques, R. Vieira-Martins, J. I. B. Camargo, M. Assafin, R. Duffard, E. Jehin, J. Pollock, R. Leiva, M. Emilio, D. I. Machado, C. Colazo, E. Lellouch, J. Skottfelt, M. Gillon, N. Ligier, L. Ma- quet, G. Benedetti-Rossi, A. Ramos Gomes, P. Kervella, H. Monteiro, R. Sfair, M. El Moutamid, G. Tancredi...

    2014

Show all 136 references
  1. [8]

    Leiva, B

    R. Leiva, B. Sicardy, J. I. B. Camargo, J. L. Ortiz, J. Desmars, D. B´erard, E. Lellouch, E. Meza, P. Kervella, C. Snodgrass, R. Duffard, N. Morales, A. R. Gomes-J ´unior, G. Benedetti-Rossi, R. Vieira-Martins, F. Braga-Ribas, M. Assafin, B. E. Morgado, F. Colas, C. De Witt, A...

    2017

  2. [9]

    B ´erard, B

    D. B ´erard, B. Sicardy, J. I. B. Camargo, J. Desmars, F. Braga-Ribas, J. L. Ortiz, R. Duffard, N. Morales, E. Meza, R. Leiva, G. Benedetti-Rossi, R. Vieira-Martins, A. R. Gomes J´unior, M. Assafin, F. Colas, J. L. Dauvergne, P. Kervella, J. Lecacheux, L. Maquet, F. Vachier, S...

    2017

  3. [10]

    B. E. Morgado, B. Sicardy, F. Braga-Ribas, J. Desmars, A. R. Gomes-J ´unior, D. B ´erard, R. Leiva, J. L. Ortiz, R. Vieira-Martins, G. Benedetti-Rossi, P. Santos- Sanz, J. I. B. Camargo, R. Duffard, F. L. Rommel, M. Assafin, R. C. Boufleur, F. Colas, M. Kretlow, W. Beisker, R....

    2013

  4. [11]

    Santos-Sanz, A

    P. Santos-Sanz, A. Gomes J ´unior, B. Morgado, B. J. Holler, J. Stansberry, H. B. Ham- mel, B. Sicardy, N. Morales, J. Desmars, N. Pinilla-Alonso, R. French, Z.-Y . Lin, E. Fern´andez-Valenzuela, M. Vara-Lubiano, M. Kretlow, D. Souami, F. Braga-Ribas, J. Camargo, G. Benedetti-...

    2023

  5. [12]

    Rousselot, P

    P. Rousselot, P. P. Korsun, I. Kulyk, A. Guilbert-Lepoutre, and J. M. Petit. A long-term follow up of 174P/Echeclus. MNRAS, 462:S432–S442, November 2016

    2016

  6. [13]

    Bauer, Young-Jun Choi, Paul R

    James M. Bauer, Young-Jun Choi, Paul R. Weissman, John A. Stansberry, Yanga R. Fern´andez, Henry G. Roe, Bonnie J. Buratti, and Hyun-Il Sung. The Large-Grained Dust Coma of 174P/Echeclus. PASP, 120(866):393, April 2008

    2008

  7. [14]

    C. L. Pereira, F. Braga-Ribas, B. Sicardy, A. R. Gomes-J ´unior, J. L. Ortiz, H. C. Branco, J. I. B. Camargo, B. E. Morgado, R. Vieira-Martins, M. Assafin, G. Benedetti- Rossi, J. Desmars, M. Emilio, R. Morales, F. L. Rommel, T. Hayamizu, T. Gon- dou, E. Jehin, R. A. Artola, A...

    2024

  8. [15]

    D. Jewitt. The Persistent Coma of Comet P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 1. ApJ, 351:277, March 1990

    1990

  9. [16]

    Wierzchos and M

    K. Wierzchos and M. Womack. CO Gas and Dust Outbursts from Centaur 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann. AJ, 159(4):136, April 2020

    2020

  10. [17]

    M. W. Buie, J. M. Keller, R. Miles, M. Kretlow, V . Nikitin, RECON Team, and Can- CON Occultation Team. Occultation results for 29p/schwassmann-wachmann. In Asteroids, Comets, Meteors Conference, page Abstract #2445, Houston, 2023. Lunar and Planetary Institute

    2023

  11. [18]

    Noll, Harold F

    Keith S. Noll, Harold F. Levison, Will M. Grundy, and Denise C. Stephens. Discovery of a binary centaur. Icarus, 184(2):611–618, 2006

    2006

  12. [19]

    W. M. Grundy, K. S. Noll, J. Virtanen, K. Muinonen, S. D. Kern, D. C. Stephens, J. A. Stansberry, H. F. Levison, and J. R. Spencer. (42355) Typhon Echidna: Scheduling observations for binary orbit determination. Icarus, 197(1):260–268, September 2008. 32BIBLIOGRAPHY

    2008

  13. [20]

    J. A. Stansberry, W. M. Grundy, M. Mueller, S. D. Benecchi, G. H. Rieke, K. S. Noll, M. W. Buie, H. F. Levison, S. B. Porter, and H. G. Roe. Physical properties of trans- neptunian binaries (120347) Salacia-Actaea and (42355) Typhon-Echidna. Icarus, 219(2):676–688, June 2012

    2012

  14. [21]

    Grundy, J.A

    W.M. Grundy, J.A. Stansberry, K.S. Noll, D.C. Stephens, D.E. Trilling, S.D. Kern, J.R. Spencer, D.P. Cruikshank, and H.F. Levison. The orbit, mass, size, albedo, and density of (65489) ceto/phorcys: A tidally-evolved binary centaur. Icarus, 191(1):286–297, 2007

    2007

  15. [22]

    Ortiz, P

    J.L. Ortiz, P. Santos-Sanz, B. Sicardy, G. Benedetti-Rossi, D. B ´erard, N. Morales, R. Duffard, F. Braga-Ribas, C. Hopp, U. Ries, V . Nascimbeni, F. Marzari, V . Granata, A. P´al, C. Kiss, T. Pribulla, R. Komˇz´ık, K. Hornoch, P. Pravec, P. Bacci, M. Maestrip- ieri, L. Nerli,...

    2017

  16. [23]

    Morgado, B

    B.E. Morgado, B. Sicardy, F. Braga-Ribas, J.L. Ortiz, H. Salo, F. Vachier, J. Des- mars, C. L. Pereira, P. Santos-Sanz, R. Sfair, T. de Santana, M. Assafin, R. Vieira- Martins, A. R. Gomes-Junior, G. Margoti, V .S. Dhillon, E. Fern ´andez-Valenzuela, J. Broughton, J. Bradshaw,...

    2023

  17. [24]

    R. A. N. Araujo, R. Sfair, and O. C. Winter. The Rings of Chariklo under Close Encounters with the Giant Planets. ApJ, 824(2):80, June 2016

    2016

  18. [25]

    Kueny, Chadwick A

    Colin Orion Chandler, Jay K. Kueny, Chadwick A. Trujillo, David E. Trilling, and William J. Oldroyd. Cometary Activity Discovered on a Distant Centaur: A Non- aqueous Sublimation Mechanism. ApJ, 892(2):L38, April 2020. BIBLIOGRAPHY33

    2020

  19. [26]

    F. L. Rommel, F. Braga-Ribas, J. Desmars, J. I. B. Camargo, J. L. Ortiz, B. Sicardy, R. Vieira-Martins, M. Assafin, P. Santos-Sanz, R. Duffard, E. Fern´andez-Valenzuela, J. Lecacheux, B. E. Morgado, G. Benedetti-Rossi, A. R. Gomes-J´unior, C. L. Pereira, D. Herald, W. Hanna, J...

    2020

  20. [27]

    Fern ´andez-Valenzuela, N

    E. Fern ´andez-Valenzuela, N. Morales, M. Vara-Lubiano, J. L. Ortiz, G. Benedetti- Rossi, B. Sicardy, M. Kretlow, P. Santos-Sanz, B. Morgado, D. Souami, F. Organero, L. Ana, F. Fonseca, A. Rom ´an, S. Alonso, R. Gonc ¸alves, M. Ferreira, R. Iglesias- Marzoa, J. L. Lamadrid, A....

    2019

  21. [28]

    Fern ´andez-Valenzuela, J

    E. Fern ´andez-Valenzuela, J. L. Ortiz, R. Duffard, N. Morales, and P. Santos- Sanz. Physical properties of centaur (54598) Bienor from photometry. MNRAS, 466(4):4147–4158, April 2017

    2017

  22. [29]

    Santos-Sanz, J

    P. Santos-Sanz, J. L. Ortiz, B. Sicardy, G. Benedetti-Rossi, N. Morales, E. Fern´andez- Valenzuela, R. Duffard, R. Iglesias-Marzoa, J. L. Lamadrid, N. Ma ´ıcas, L. P ´erez, K. Gazeas, J. C. Guirado, V . Peris, F. J. Ballesteros, F. Organero, L. Ana-Hern´andez, F. Fonseca, A. A...

    2017

  23. [30]

    Strauss, Rodrigo Leiva, John M

    Ryder H. Strauss, Rodrigo Leiva, John M. Keller, Elizabeth Wilde, Marc W. Buie, Robert J. Weryk, J. J. Kavelaars, Terry Bridges, Lawrence H. Wasserman, David E. Trilling, Deanna Ainsworth, Seth Anthony, Robert Baker, Jerry Bardecker, James K. Bean, Stephen Bock, Stefani Chase,...

    2014

  24. [31]

    J. L. Elliot, E. Dunham, L. H. Wasserman, R. L. Millis, and J. Churms. The radii of Uranian rings alpha , beta , gamma , delta , epsilon , eta , 4, 5, and 6 from their occultations of SAO 158687. AJ, 83:980–992, August 1978

    1978

  25. [32]

    A. S. Bosh, C. B. Olkin, R. G. French, and P. D. Nicholson. Saturn’s F Ring: Kine- matics and Particle Sizes from Stellar Occultation Studies. Icarus, 157(1):57–75, May 2002

    2002

  26. [33]

    Miles and M

    R. Miles and M. Kretlow. Studying Comets by the Stellar Occultation Method.Jour- nal for Occultation Astronomy, 8(1):11–13, January 2018

    2018

  27. [34]

    Combes, J

    M. Combes, J. Lecacheux, T. Encrenaz, B. Sicardy, Y . Zeau, and D. Malaise. On stellar occultations by comets. Icarus, 56(2):229–232, 1983

    1983

  28. [35]

    Fern ´andez, Dennis D

    Yanga R. Fern ´andez, Dennis D. Wellnitz, Marc W. Buie, Edward W. Dunham, Robert L. Millis, Ralph A. Nye, John A. Stansberry, Lawrence H. Wasserman, Michael F. A’Hearn, Carey M. Lisse, Meg E. Golden, Michael J. Person, Robert R. Howell, Robert L. Marcialis, and Joseph N. Spita...

    1999

  29. [36]

    Extinction in the Coma of Comet 17P/Holmes

    Pedro Lacerda and David Jewitt. Extinction in the Coma of Comet 17P/Holmes. ApJ, 760(1):L2, November 2012

    2012

  30. [37]

    Miles and M

    R. Miles and M. Kretlow. Comet 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 1: The Appulse of 2020 December 8 and Future Prospects for Stellar Occultations, 2021-2029.Journal for Occultation Astronomy, 11(3):3–9, July 2021

    2020

  31. [38]

    H. J. Reitsema, W. B. Hubbard, L. A. Lebofsky, and D. J. Tholen. AAAS Research Briefing.Science, 215(4531):388–389, January 1982

    1982

  32. [39]

    Fern ´andez-Valenzuela, B

    E. Fern ´andez-Valenzuela, B. J. Holler, J. L. Ortiz, F. Vachier, F. Braga Ribas, F. L. Rommel, J. Desmars, M. Buie, A. M. Levine, V . Nikitin, M. F. Skrutskie, C. Col- lyer, A. Verbiscer, J. Stansberry, D. DeColibus, J. Castro Chac´on, N. Chanover, R. J. McMillan, R. P. Boyle...

    2023

  33. [40]

    A. A. Sickafoose, A. S. Bosh, S. E. Levine, C. A. Zuluaga, A. Genade, K. Schindler, T. A. Lister, and M. J. Person. A stellar occultation by Vanth, a satellite of (90482) Orcus. Icarus, 319:657–668, February 2019

    2019

  34. [41]

    Darin Ragozzine, Seth Pincock, Benjamin C. N. Proudfoot, Dallin Spencer, Simon Porter, and Will Grundy. Beyond Point Masses. I. New Non-Keplerian Model- ing Tools Applied to Trans-Neptunian Triple (47171) Lempo.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2403.12785, March 2024

    2024 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Benjamin C. N. Proudfoot, Darin A. Ragozzine, Meagan L. Thatcher, Will Grundy, Dallin J. Spencer, Tahina M. Alailima, Sawyer Allen, Penelope C. Bowden, Susanne Byrd, Conner D. Camacho, Gibson H. Campbell, Edison P. Carlisle, Jacob A. Chris- tensen, Noah K. Christensen, Kaelyn ...

    2024

  36. [43]

    Verbiscer, Michael F

    Anne J. Verbiscer, Michael F. Skrutskie, and Douglas P. Hamilton. Saturn’s largest ring. Nature, 461(7267):1098–1100, October 2009

    2009

  37. [44]

    Tiscareno, Mark R

    Matthew S. Tiscareno, Mark R. Showalter, Richard G. French, Joseph A. Burns, Jef- frey N. Cuzzi, Imke de Pater, Douglas P. Hamilton, Matthew M. Hedman, Philip D. Nicholson, Daniel Tamayo, Anne J. Verbiscer, Stefanie N. Milam, and John A. Stansberry. Observing Planetary Rings a...

    2016

  38. [45]

    A. L. Cochran and W. D. Cochran. The first detection of CN and the distribution of CO + gas in the coma of Comet P/Schwassmann-Wachman 1. Icarus, 90(1):172–175, March 1991

    1991

  39. [46]

    M. F. A’Hearn, D. G. Schleicher, R. L. Millis, P. D. Feldman, and D. T. Thompson. Comet Bowell 1980b. AJ, 89:579–591, April 1984

    1984

  40. [47]

    Dust Outburst Dynamics and Hazard Assessment for Close Spacecraft-Comet Encounters

    Uwe Fink, Walter Harris, Lyn Doose, Kat V olk, Laura Woodney, Tony Farnham, and Maria Womack. Dust Outburst Dynamics and Hazard Assessment for Close Spacecraft-Comet Encounters. PSJ, 2(4):154, August 2021. 36BIBLIOGRAPHY

    2021

  41. [48]

    Rousselot

    P. Rousselot. 174P/Echeclus: a strange case of outburst. A&A, 480(2):543–550, March 2008

    2008

  42. [49]

    J. A. Stansberry, J. Van Cleve, W. T. Reach, D. P. Cruikshank, J. P. Emery, Y . R. Fer- nandez, V . S. Meadows, K. Y . L. Su, K. Misselt, G. H. Rieke, E. T. Young, M. W. Werner, C. W. Engelbracht, K. D. Gordon, D. C. Hines, D. M. Kelly, J. E. Mor- rison, and J. Muzerolle. Spit...

    2004

  43. [50]

    Disintegrating Asteroid P/2013 R3

    David Jewitt, Jessica Agarwal, Jing Li, Harold Weaver, Max Mutchler, and Stephen Larson. Disintegrating Asteroid P/2013 R3. ApJ, 784(1):L8, March 2014

    2013

  44. [51]

    Weissman, S

    Paul R. Weissman, S. R. Chesley, Y . J. Choi, J. M. Bauer, S. C. Tegler, W. J. Ro- manishin, G. Consolmagno, and J. A. Stansberry. Motion of the Activity Source As- sociated with Active Centaur 174P/Echeclus (60558). InAAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts #38,...

    2006

  45. [52]

    Singer, S

    Kelsi N. Singer, S. Alan Stern, John Elliott, Reza R. Karimi, Daniel Stern, Arthur B. Chimelewski, Michael J. Fong, John Andrews, William F. Bottke, Catherine B. Olkin, Paul Propster, and Sam W. Thurman. A new spacecraft mission concept combining the first exploration of the C...

    2021

  46. [53]

    Thomas G. M ¨uller, Emmanuel Lellouch, Hermann B ¨ohnhardt, John Stansberry, An- tonella Barucci, Jacques Crovisier, Audrey Delsanti, Alain Doressoundiram, Elisa- betta Dotto, Ren ´e Duffard, Sonia Fornasier, Olivier Groussin, Pedro J. Guti ´errez, Olivier Hainaut, Alan W. Har...

    2009

  47. [54]

    G. H. Rieke, E. T. Young, C. W. Engelbracht, D. M. Kelly, F. J. Low, E. E. Haller, J. W. Beeman, K. D. Gordon, J. A. Stansberry, K. A. Misselt, J. Cadien, J. E. Morrison, G. Rivlis, W. B. Latter, A. Noriega-Crespo, D. L. Padgett, K. R. Stapelfeldt, D. C. Hines, E. Egami, J. Mu...

    2004

  48. [55]

    Poglitsch, C

    A. Poglitsch, C. Waelkens, N. Geis, H. Feuchtgruber, B. Vandenbussche, L. Ro- driguez, O. Krause, E. Renotte, C. van Hoof, P. Saraceno, J. Cepa, F. Kerschbaum, P. Agn`ese, B. Ali, B. Altieri, P. Andreani, J.-L. Augueres, Z. Balog, L. Barl, O. H. Bauer, N. Belbachir, M. Benedet...

    2010

  49. [56]

    M. J. Griffin, A. Abergel, A. Abreu, P. a. R. Ade, P. Andr ´e, J.-L. Augueres, T. Babbedge, Y . Bae, T. Baillie, J.-P. Baluteau, M. J. Barlow, G. Bendo, D. Be- nielli, J. J. Bock, P. Bonhomme, D. Brisbin, C. Brockley-Blatt, M. Caldwell, C. Cara, N. Castro-Rodriguez, R. Cerulli...

    2010

  50. [57]

    F. L. Rommel, F. Braga-Ribas, J. L. Ortiz, B. Sicardy, P. Santos-Sanz, J. Desmars, and J. I. B. Camargo. A large topographic feature on the surface of the trans-Neptunian object (307261) 2002 MS4 measured from stellar occultations. A&A, August 2023

    2002

  51. [58]

    J. L. Ortiz, P. Santos-Sanz, B. Sicardy, G. Benedetti-Rossi, R. Duffard, N. Morales, F. Braga-Ribas, E. Fern ´andez-Valenzuela, V . Nascimbeni, D. Nardiello, A. Carbog- nani, L. Buzzi, A. Aletti, P. Bacci, M. Maestripieri, L. Mazzei, H. Mikuz, J. Skvarc, 38BIBLIOGRAPHY F. Ciab...

    2002

  52. [59]

    Bottke, Harold F

    David Nesvorn ´y, David V okrouhlick´y, William F. Bottke, Harold F. Levison, and William M. Grundy. Very Slow Rotators from Tidally Synchronized Binaries. ApJ, 893(1):L16, April 2020

    2020

  53. [60]

    Sheppard

    Audrey Thirouin and Scott S. Sheppard. The Plutino Population: An Abundance of Contact Binaries. AJ, 155(6):248, May 2018

    2018

  54. [61]

    Showalter, Susan D

    Mark R. Showalter, Susan D. Benecchi, Marc W. Buie, William M. Grundy, James T. Keane, Carey M. Lisse, Cathy B. Olkin, Simon B. Porter, Stuart J. Robbins, Kelsi N. Singer, Anne J. Verbiscer, Harold A. Weaver, Amanda M. Zangari, Douglas P. Hamil- ton, David E. Kaufmann, Tod R. ...

    2021

  55. [62]

    Thirouin, J

    A. Thirouin, J. L. Ortiz, R. Duffard, P. Santos-Sanz, F. J. Aceituno, and N. Morales. Short-term variability of a sample of 29 trans-Neptunian objects and Centaurs. A&A, 522:A93, November 2010

    2010

  56. [63]

    M. M. Hedman, P. D. Nicholson, J. N. Cuzzi, R. N. Clark, G. Filacchione, F. Capac- cioni, and M. Ciarniello. Connections between spectra and structure in Saturn’s main rings based on Cassini VIMS data. Icarus, 223(1):105–130, March 2013

    2013

  57. [64]

    Duffard, N

    R. Duffard, N. Pinilla-Alonso, J. L. Ortiz, A. Alvarez-Candal, B. Sicardy, P. Santos- Sanz, N. Morales, C. Colazo, E. Fern ´andez-Valenzuela, and F. Braga-Ribas. Photo- metric and spectroscopic evidence for a dense ring system around Centaur Chariklo. A&A, 568:A79, August 2014

    2014

  58. [65]

    TNOs are Cool

    P. Santos-Sanz, E. Lellouch, S. Fornasier, C. Kiss, A. Pal, T. G. M ¨uller, E. Vilenius, J. Stansberry, M. Mommert, A. Delsanti, M. Mueller, N. Peixinho, F. Henry, J. L. Ortiz, A. Thirouin, S. Protopapa, R. Duffard, N. Szalai, T. Lim, C. Ejeta, P. Hartogh, A. W. Harris, and M....

    2012

  59. [66]

    Levison and Martin J

    Harold F. Levison and Martin J. Duncan. From the Kuiper Belt to Jupiter-Family Comets: The Spatial Distribution of Ecliptic Comets. Icarus, 127(1):13–32, May 1997

    1997

  60. [67]

    Sarid, K

    G. Sarid, K. V olk, J. K. Steckloff, W. Harris, M. Womack, and L. M. Woodney. 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 1, A Centaur in the Gateway to the Jupiter-family Comets. ApJ, 883(1):L25, September 2019

    2019

  61. [69]

    Noll, William M

    Keith S. Noll, William M. Grundy, David Nesvorn ´y, and Audrey Thirouin. Chapter 9 - Trans-Neptunian binaries (2018). In Dina Prialnik, M. Antonietta Barucci, and Leslie A. Young, editors,The Trans-Neptunian Solar System, pages 205–224. Else- vier, January 2020

    2018

  62. [70]

    The nuclei of Jupiter family comets: A critical review of our present knowledge

    Nicolas Thomas. The nuclei of Jupiter family comets: A critical review of our present knowledge. Planet. Space Sci., 57(10):1106–1117, August 2009

    2009

  63. [71]

    Safrit, Jordan K

    Taylor K. Safrit, Jordan K. Steckloff, Amanda S. Bosh, David Nesvorny, Kevin Walsh, Ramon Brasser, and David A. Minton. The Formation of Bilobate Comet Shapes through Sublimative Torques. PSJ, 2(1):14, February 2021

    2021

  64. [72]

    Parker and J

    Alex H. Parker and J. J. Kavelaars. Destruction of Binary Minor Planets During Neptune Scattering. ApJ, 722(2):L204–L208, October 2010

    2010

  65. [73]

    Binary survival in the outer solar system

    David Nesvorn ´y and David V okrouhlick´y. Binary survival in the outer solar system. Icarus, 331:49–61, October 2019

    2019

  66. [74]

    Stone and Nathan A

    Lukas R. Stone and Nathan A. Kaib. Evolution of primordial Kuiper belt binaries through a giant planet instability. MNRAS, 505(1):L31–L35, July 2021

    2021

  67. [75]

    R. A. N. Araujo, M. A. Galiazzo, O. C. Winter, and R. Sfair. The journey of Typhon- Echidna as a binary system through the planetary region. MNRAS, 476(4):5323– 5331, June 2018

    2018

  68. [76]

    W. M. Grundy, K. S. Noll, H. G. Roe, M. W. Buie, S. B. Porter, A. H. Parker, D. Nesvorn ´y, H. F. Levison, S. D. Benecchi, D. C. Stephens, and C. A. Trujillo. Mutual orbit orientations of transneptunian binaries. Icarus, 334:62–78, December 2019

    2019

  69. [77]

    Campbell, Lukas R

    Hunter M. Campbell, Lukas R. Stone, and Nathan A. Kaib. Close Trans-Neptunian Object Passages as a Driver of the Origin and Evolution of Ultrawide Kuiper Belt Binaries. AJ, 165(1):19, January 2023

    2023

  70. [78]

    Sheppard and David C

    Scott S. Sheppard and David C. Jewitt. Time-resolved Photometry of Kuiper Belt Objects: Rotations, Shapes, and Phase Functions. AJ, 124(3):1757–1775, September 2002. 40BIBLIOGRAPHY

    2002

  71. [79]

    Schwamb, Elena Hadjiyska, Suzanne Tourtellotte, and Patricio Rojo

    David Rabinowitz, Megan E. Schwamb, Elena Hadjiyska, Suzanne Tourtellotte, and Patricio Rojo. The Peculiar Photometric Properties of 2010 WG9: A Slowly Rotating Trans-Neptunian Object from the Oort Cloud. AJ, 146(1):17, July 2013

    2010

  72. [80]

    Rings in the Solar System: A Short Review

    S ´ebastien Charnoz, Aur´elien Crida, and Ryuki Hyodo. Rings in the Solar System: A Short Review. In Hans J. Deeg and Juan Antonio Belmonte, editors,Handbook of Exoplanets, page 54. Springer International Publishing, 2018

    2018

  73. [81]

    J. N. Cuzzi, A. D. Whizin, R. C. Hogan, A. R. Dobrovolskis, L. Dones, M. R. Showal- ter, J. E. Colwell, and J. D. Scargle. Saturn’s F Ring core: Calm in the midst of chaos. Icarus, 232:157–175, April 2014

    2014

  74. [82]

    Ockert-Bell, Joseph A

    Maureen E. Ockert-Bell, Joseph A. Burns, Ingrid J. Daubar, Peter C. Thomas, Joseph Veverka, M. J. S. Belton, and Kenneth P. Klaasen. The Structure of Jupiter’s Ring System as Revealed by the Galileo Imaging Experiment. Icarus, 138(2):188–213, April 1999

    1999

  75. [83]

    J. L. Elliot, E. Dunham, and D. Mink. The rings of Uranus. Nature, 267(5609):328– 330, May 1977

    1977

  76. [84]

    Peter Goldreich and Carolyn C. Porco. Shepherding of the Uranian Rings. II. Dynam- ics. AJ, 93:730, March 1987

    1987

  77. [85]

    C. C. Porco and P. Goldreich. Shepherding of the Uranian Rings. I. Kinematics. AJ, 93:724, March 1987

    1987

  78. [86]

    Showalter and Jack J

    Mark R. Showalter and Jack J. Lissauer. The Second Ring-Moon System of Uranus: Discovery and Dynamics.Science, 311(5763):973–977, February 2006

    2006

  79. [87]

    W. B. Hubbard, A. Brahic, B. Sicardy, L. R. Elicer, F. Roques, and F. Vilas. Occul- tation detection of a neptunian ring-like arc. Nature, 319(6055):636–640, February 1986

    1986

  80. [88]

    Souami, S

    D. Souami, S. Renner, B. Sicardy, M. Langlois, B. Carry, P. Delorme, and P. Go- laszewska. Neptune’s ring arcs from VLT/SPHERE-IRDIS near-infrared observa- tions. A&A, 657:A134, January 2022

    2022

  81. [89]

    The confinement of Neptune’s ring arcs by the moon Galatea

    Fathi Namouni and Carolyn Porco. The confinement of Neptune’s ring arcs by the moon Galatea. Nature, 417(6884):45–47, May 2002

    2002

  82. [90]

    Stationary Configurations for Co-orbital Satel- lites with Small Arbitrary Masses.Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 88(4):397–414, April 2004

    St ´efan Renner and Bruno Sicardy. Stationary Configurations for Co-orbital Satel- lites with Small Arbitrary Masses.Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 88(4):397–414, April 2004

    2004

  83. [91]

    S. M. Giuliatti Winter, G. Madeira, and R. Sfair. Neptune’s ring arcs confined by coor- bital satellites: dust orbital evolution through solar radiation. MNRAS, 496(1):590– 597, July 2020

    2020

  84. [92]

    Marcialis and Bonnie J

    Robert L. Marcialis and Bonnie J. Buratti. CCD Photometry of 2060 Chiron in 1985 and 1991. Icarus, 104(2):234–243, August 1993. BIBLIOGRAPHY41

    1985

  85. [93]

    Alvarez-Candal, C Snodgrass, G.˜P

    S Fornasier, D Lazzaro, A. Alvarez-Candal, C Snodgrass, G.˜P. P Tozzi, J.˜M. M Carvano, Y . Jim´enez-Teja, J.˜S. S Silva, and D.˜M. M Bramich. The Centaur 10199 Chariklo: Investigation into rotational period, absolute magnitude, and cometary ac- tivity. A&A, 568:L11, August 2014

    2014

  86. [94]

    M. D. Melita, R. Duffard, J.L. Ortiz, and A. Campo-Bagatin. Assessment of different formation scenarios for the ring system of (10199) chariklo.Astronomy l& Astro- physics, 602:A27, 2017

    2017

  87. [95]

    J. L. Ortiz, P. J. Guti ´errez, A. Sota, V . Casanova, and V . R. Teixeira. Rotational brightness variations in Trans-Neptunian Object 50000 Quaoar. A&A, 409:L13–L16, October 2003

    2003

  88. [96]

    C. L. Pereira, B. Sicardy, B. E. Morgado, F. Braga-Ribas, E. Fern ´andez-Valenzuela, D. Souami, B. J. Holler, R. C. Boufleur, G. Margoti, M. Assafin, J. L. Ortiz, P. Santos- Sanz, B. Epinat, P. Kervella, J. Desmars, R. Vieira-Martins, Y . Kilic, A. R. Gomes J´unior, J. I. B. C...

    2023

  89. [97]

    C. L. Pereira, B. Sicardy, B. E. Morgado, F. Braga-Ribas, E. Fern ´andez-Valenzuela, D. Souami, B. J. Holler, R. C. Boufleur, G. Margoti, M. Assafin, J. L. Ortiz, P. Santos- Sanz, B. Epinat, P. Kervella, J. Desmars, R. Vieira-Martins, Y . Kilic, A. R. Gomes- J´unior, J. I. B. ...

    2024

  90. [98]

    Rabinowitz, Kristina Barkume, Michael E

    David L. Rabinowitz, Kristina Barkume, Michael E. Brown, Henry Roe, Michael Schwartz, Suzanne Tourtellotte, and Chad Trujillo. Photometric Observations Con- straining the Size, Shape, and Albedo of 2003 EL61, a Rapidly Rotating, Pluto-sized Object in the Kuiper Belt. ApJ, 639(...

    2003

  91. [99]

    A. A. Sickafoose, A. S. Bosh, J. P. Emery, M. J. Person, C. A. Zuluaga, M. Womack, F. Bianco, S. J. Bus, J. D. Ruprecht, and A. M. Zangari. Characterization of material around the centaur (2060) chiron from a visible and near-infrared stellar occultation in 2011.Monthly Notice...

    2011

  92. [100]

    B. E. Morgado, B. Sicardy, F. Braga-Ribas, J. L. Ortiz, H. Salo, F. Vachier, J. Des- mars, C. L. Pereira, P. Santos-Sanz, R. Sfair, T. de Santana, M. Assafin, R. Vieira- Martins, A. R. Gomes-J ´unior, G. Margoti, V . S. Dhillon, E. Fern ´andez-Valenzuela, J. Broughton, J. Brad...

    2024

  93. [101]

    K. J. Meech and M. J. S. Belton. (2060) Chiron. IAU Circ., 4770:1, April 1989

    1989

  94. [102]

    Luu and David C

    Jane X. Luu and David C. Jewitt. Cometary Activity in 2060 Chiron. AJ, 100:913, September 1990

    1990

  95. [103]

    Braga-Ribas, C

    F. Braga-Ribas, C. L. Pereira, B. Sicardy, J. L. Ortiz, J. Desmars, A. Sickafoose, M. Emilio, B. Morgado, G. Margoti, F. L. Rommel, J. I. B. Camargo, M. Assafin, R. Vieira-Martins, A. R. Gomes-J ´unior, P. Santos-Sanz, N. Morales, M. Kretlow, J. Lecacheux, F. Colas, R. Boninse...

    2018

  96. [104]

    Brown, Kristina M

    Michael E. Brown, Kristina M. Barkume, Darin Ragozzine, and Emily L. Schaller. A collisional family of icy objects in the Kuiper belt. Nature, 446(7133):294–296, March 2007

    2007

  97. [105]

    On the mass and origin of chariklo’s rings

    Margaret Pan and Yanqin Wu. On the mass and origin of chariklo’s rings. ApJ, 821(1):18, apr 2016

    2016

  98. [106]

    Nicholson, Matthew M

    Philip D. Nicholson, Matthew M. Hedman, Roger N. Clark, Mark R. Showalter, Dale P. Cruikshank, Jeffrey N. Cuzzi, Gianrico Filacchione, Fabrizio Capaccioni, Priscilla Cerroni, Gary B. Hansen, Bruno Sicardy, Pierre Drossart, Robert H. Brown, Bonnie J. Buratti, Kevin H. Baines, a...

    2008

  99. [107]

    Groussin, P

    O. Groussin, P. Lamy, and L. Jorda. Properties of the nuclei of Centaurs Chiron and Chariklo. A&A, 413:1163–1175, January 2004

    2004

  100. [108]

    J. L. Elliot, R. G. French, K. J. Meech, and J. H. Elias. Structure of the uranian rings. i. square-well model and particle-size constraints.Astronomical Journal, 89:1587– 1603, 1984. BIBLIOGRAPHY43

    1984

  101. [109]

    J. N. Cuzzi. Rings of uranus – not so thick, not so black. Icarus, 63:312–316, 1985

    1985

  102. [110]

    R. G. French, J. L. Elliot, and S. Levine. Structure of the uranian rings. ii. ring orbits and widths. Icarus, 67:134–163, 1986

    1986

  103. [111]

    M. S. Tiscareno, M. M. Hedman, J.A. Burns, and J. Castillo-Rogez. Compositions and Origins of Outer Planet Systems: Insights from the Roche Critical Density.Astrophys J Lett, 765(1):1602–1697, December 2013

    2013

  104. [112]

    C. C. Porco, P. C. Thomas, J.W. Weiss, and D. C. Richardson. Saturn’s small satellites: clues to their origins.Science, 318(1):1602–1697, December 2007

    2007

  105. [113]

    Sicardy, R

    B. Sicardy, R. Leiva, S. Renner, F. Roques, M. El Moutamid, P. Santos-Sanz, and J. Desmars. Ring dynamics around non-axisymmetric bodies with application to Chariklo and Haumea.Nature Astronomy, 3:146–153, April 2019

    2019

  106. [114]

    Sickafoose and Mark C

    Amanda A. Sickafoose and Mark C. Lewis. Numerical Simulations of (10199) Chariklo’s Rings with a Resonant Perturber. PSJ, 5(2):32, February 2024

    2024

  107. [115]

    De Pater, S

    I. De Pater, S. Renner, M. R. Showalter, and B. Sicardy. The Rings of Neptune. In M. S. Tiscareno and C. D. Murray, editors,Planetary Ring Systems. Properties, Structure, and Evolution, pages 112–124. Cambridge University Press, 2018

    2018

  108. [116]

    Use of the Geometric Elements in Numerical Sim- ulations.Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 94(2):237–248, February 2006

    St ´efan Renner and Bruno Sicardy. Use of the Geometric Elements in Numerical Sim- ulations.Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 94(2):237–248, February 2006

    2006

  109. [117]

    Ribeiro, O

    T. Ribeiro, O. C. Winter, D. Mour ˜ao, L. A. G. Boldrin, and J. P. S. Carvalho. Quasi circular orbits around prolate bodies. MNRAS, 506(2):3068–3078, September 2021

    2021

  110. [118]

    Goldreich and S

    P. Goldreich and S. Tremaine. Towards a theory for the Uranian rings. Nature, 277:97– 99, January 1979

    1979

  111. [119]

    M. D. Melita and J. C. B. Papaloizou. Apse-alignment in narrow-eccentric ringlets and its implications for theε-ring of Uranus and the ring system of (10199) Chariklo. Icarus, 335:113366, January 2020

    2020

  112. [120]

    Resonances in Nonaxisymmetric Gravitational Potentials

    Bruno Sicardy. Resonances in Nonaxisymmetric Gravitational Potentials. AJ, 159(3):102, March 2020

    2020

  113. [121]

    O. C. Winter and C. D. Murray. Resonance and chaos. I. First-order interior reso- nances. A&A, 319:290–304, March 1997

    1997

  114. [122]

    S. M. Giuliatti Winter, G. Madeira, T. Ribeiro, O. C. Winter, G. O. Barbosa, and G. Borderes-Motta. The stability around Chariklo and the confinement of its rings. A&A, 679:A62, November 2023

    2023

  115. [123]

    O. C. Winter, G. Borderes-Motta, and T. Ribeiro. On the location of the ring around the dwarf planet Haumea. MNRAS, 484(3):3765–3771, April 2019. 44BIBLIOGRAPHY

    2019

  116. [124]

    Madeira, S

    G. Madeira, S. M. Giuliatti Winter, T. Ribeiro, and O. C. Winter. Dynamics around non-spherical symmetric bodies - I. The case of a spherical body with mass anomaly. MNRAS, 510(1):1450–1469, February 2022

    2022

  117. [125]

    Ribeiro, O

    T. Ribeiro, O. C. Winter, G. Madeira, and S. M. Giuliatti Winter. Dynamics around non-spherical symmetric bodies: II. The case of a prolate body. MNRAS, 525(1):44– 56, October 2023

    2023

  118. [126]

    Simulating the Smallest Ring World of Chariklo

    Shugo Michikoshi and Eiichiro Kokubo. Simulating the Smallest Ring World of Chariklo. ApJ, 837(1):L13, March 2017

    2017

  119. [127]

    Weissman

    Young-Jun Choi and P. Weissman. Discovery of Cometary Activity for Centaur 174P/Echeclus (60558). InAAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts #38, volume 38 ofAAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts, page 37.05, September 2006

    2006

  120. [128]

    Physical Characterization of the 2017 December Outburst of the Centaur 174P/Echeclus

    Theodore Kareta, Benjamin Sharkey, John Noonan, Kat V olk, Vishnu Reddy, Walter Harris, and Richard Miles. Physical Characterization of the 2017 December Outburst of the Centaur 174P/Echeclus. AJ, 158(6):255, December 2019

    2017

  121. [129]

    J. M. Trigo-Rodr ´ıguez, E. Garc ´ıa-Melendo, B. J. R. Davidsson, A. S ´anchez, D. Rodr´ıguez, J. Lacruz, J. A. de Los Reyes, and S. Pastor. Outburst activity in comets. I. Continuous monitoring of comet 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 1. A&A, 485(2):599–606, July 2008

    2008

  122. [130]

    S. A. Stern, O. L. White, W. M. Grundy, B. A. Keeney, J. D. Hofgartner, D. Nesvorn´y, W. B. McKinnon, D. C. Richardson, J. C. Marohnic, A. J. Verbiscer, S. D. Benecchi, P. M. Schenk, J. M. Moore, New Horizons Geology, and Geophysics Investigation Team. The Properties and Origi...

    2023

  123. [131]

    FORMA- TION OF CENTAURS’ RINGS THROUGH THEIR PARTIAL TIDAL DISRUP- TION DURING PLANETARY ENCOUNTERS

    Ryuki Hyodo, S ´ebastien Charnoz, Hidenori Genda, and Keiji Ohtsuki. FORMA- TION OF CENTAURS’ RINGS THROUGH THEIR PARTIAL TIDAL DISRUP- TION DURING PLANETARY ENCOUNTERS. ApJ, 828(1):L8, August 2016

    2016

  124. [132]

    Hinse, and Stephen C

    Jeremy Wood, Jonti Horner, Tobias C. Hinse, and Stephen C. Marsden. The Dynami- cal History of Chariklo and Its Rings. AJ, 153(6):245, June 2017

    2017

  125. [133]

    N-body Simula- tions of Ring Formation Process around the Dwarf Planet Haumea

    Iori Sumida, Yuya Ishizawa, Natsuki Hosono, and Takanori Sasaki. N-body Simula- tions of Ring Formation Process around the Dwarf Planet Haumea. ApJ, 897(1):21, 2020

    2020

  126. [134]

    Combi, and Martin Rubin

    Valeriy Tenishev, Michael R. Combi, and Martin Rubin. Numerical Simulation of Dust in a Cometary Coma: Application to Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. ApJ, 732(2):104, May 2011

    2011

  127. [135]

    Activity of BIBLIOGRAPHY45 (2060) Chiron possibly caused by impacts? MNRAS, 475(2):2512–2518, January 2018

    Stefan Cikota, Estela Fern ´andez-Valenzuela, Jose Luis Ortiz, Nicol´as Morales, Ren ´e Duffard, Jesus Aceituno, Aleksandar Cikota, and Pablo Santos-Sanz. Activity of BIBLIOGRAPHY45 (2060) Chiron possibly caused by impacts? MNRAS, 475(2):2512–2518, January 2018

    2018

  128. [136]

    Markus Kasper, Jean-Luc Beuzit, Christophe Verinaud, Raffaele G. Gratton, Florian Kerber, Natalia Yaitskova, Anthony Boccaletti, Niranjan Thatte, Hans Martin Schmid, Christoph Keller, Pierre Baudoz, Lyu Abe, Emmanuel Aller-Carpentier, Jacopo An- tichi, Mariangela Bonavita, Kje...

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.