Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Precise Timing Analysis of Four Magnetic Cataclysmic Variables with TESS

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Using TESS photometry, this paper refines V1460 Her's orbital period, reports a first beat period in J045707, and gives new or probable orbital periods for two other magnetic cataclysmic variables.

desk verdict Useful TESS timing results for four CVs, with a solid beat-period detection in J045707 and a shaky orbital-decay claim for V1460 Her that needs a cross-instrument offset fit. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.04371 v1 pith:XMANMKUS submitted 2025-06-04 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.HE

Srinivas M Rao , Jeewan C Pandey , Nikita Rawat , Arti Joshi , Ajay Kumar Singh This is my paper
classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.HE
keywords intermediatepolarscataclysmicvariablesTESSphotometryorbitalperiodbeatO-Cdiagramaccretiongeometryeclipsingbinaries
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Using long-baseline, high-cadence photometry from the TESS satellite, this paper tries to pin down the clockwork of four magnetic cataclysmic variables, binaries in which a magnetic white dwarf pulls matter from a companion star. It refines V1460 Her's orbital period to $4.98845829 \pm 0.00000009$ hours and reports that the orbit is shrinking by about 1.23 seconds per century. It also reports a first detection of a beat period of $1290.6 \pm 0.5$ seconds in J045707, a signal that bears on how material reaches the white dwarf, and assigns new orbital periods of $6.11 \pm 0.02$ hours (J0958) and a probable $3.555 \pm 0.005$ hours (V842 Cen). If these timings hold, they give sharper constraints on accretion geometry and on the long-term angular-momentum evolution of these binaries.

What carries the argument

The analysis hinges on three clocks: the orbital frequency $\Omega$, the white-dwarf spin frequency $\omega$, and the beat frequency $\omega-\Omega$ that appears when accretion partly flows along magnetic field lines rather than through the disc. These are extracted with Lomb-Scargle periodograms of TESS PDCSAP light curves, with significance judged against a noise model that includes white and red noise. For V1460 Her, the load-bearing tool is the O-C diagram: eclipse minima fitted with a constant plus a Gaussian are counted in cycles, and a parabolic fit to the residuals yields the secular period change. The absence of the $\omega+\Omega$ sideband in J045707 is what lets the authors read the 1290.6 s peak as an intrinsic beat rather than as amplitude modulation of the spin signal.

What would settle it

Re-fit the eclipse-timing data with a separate constant time offset allowed between the two contributing data sources; if the quadratic term of the O-C fit becomes consistent with zero, the claimed secular period decrease is an artifact of combining two clocks rather than a real orbital shrinkage.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes four timing results. V1460 Her has an orbital period of $4.98845829 \pm 0.00000009$ hours, and an O-C analysis of 39 archival plus 1377 TESS eclipse minima yields a secular period decrease of $-(3.9 \pm 0.2) \times 10^{-10}$ s s$^{-1}$, about 1.23 seconds per century. J045707 shows the known $1218.7 \pm 0.5$ s spin period and a newly detected beat period of $1290.6 \pm 0.5$ s; because the corresponding $\omega+\Omega$ sideband is absent, the beat is read as intrinsic and taken to suggest a disc-overflow accretion component alongside disc-fed accretion. J0958 has a first-determined orbital period of $6.11 \pm 0.02$ hours and a $296.12$ s spin period, with no beat period, supporting disc-fed accretion. V842 Cen has a probable orbital period of $3.555 \pm 0.005$ hours and a $56.5$ s periodic signal, but no secure spin period, so its status as an intermediate polar remains open.

Load-bearing premise

The claim that V1460 Her's orbit is shrinking rests on treating eclipse timings from two different sources as one consistent clock; a constant offset between them would make the apparent slowdown vanish.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • V1460 Her's orbital period is now measured to about two parts in $10^8$, and the reported decrease of about 1.23 seconds per century makes the orbit's shrinkage a directly measurable evolutionary process.
  • The intrinsic 1290.6 s beat period in J045707, if confirmed in X-rays, would make the system a case of simultaneous disc-fed and disc-overflow accretion, constraining how stream material couples to the magnetosphere.
  • J0958 now has a secure orbital period of 6.11 h and a spin-to-orbit ratio of $0.013$; the absence of a beat period supports disc-fed accretion and a relatively weak magnetic field.
  • V842 Cen's probable 3.555 h orbital period disagrees with the earlier inferred 3.94 h, and the absence of a solid spin period leaves the intermediate-polar classification of the system unsettled.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the measured $\dot{P}$ for V1460 Her persists, the binary would reach the 3-hour period gap in roughly $1.5 \times 10^{6}$ years under the current rate, turning the O-C parabola into an evolutionary clock for magnetic braking.
  • Editorial inference: the same Gaussian-minima O-C method could be applied to other eclipsing intermediate polars in the TESS data archive; a population of similar secular period changes would test whether magnetic braking at this strength is typical above the period gap.
  • Editorial inference: if the J045707 beat is intrinsic, future TESS sectors should recover a stable $1290.6$ s peak whose amplitude varies with orbital phase; that prediction discriminates disc-overflow accretion from reprocessing of the spin beam on orbital-frame structures.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript uses TESS photometry to analyze the timing behavior of four intermediate-polar-like cataclysmic variables. For V1460 Her, the authors combine 39 AAVSO and 1377 TESS eclipse timings to obtain the orbital ephemeris BJD=2458955.93245(2)+0.207852429(4)E (Eq. 1) and, from a parabolic O-C fit, infer a secular period decrease of -(3.9±0.2)×10^-10 s/s. For J045707, they report a spin period of 1218.7±0.2 s, an orbital period of 6.09±0.02 h, and a new detection of a 1290.6±0.5 s beat period. For J0958, they report a first orbital period of 6.11±0.02 h and a spin period of 296.12±0.01 s. For V842 Cen, they report a probable orbital period of 3.555±0.005 h and claim a 56.5 s folded signal despite no corresponding periodogram peak. The paper concludes with accretion-geometry interpretations for each system.

Significance. If confirmed, the V1460 Her period decrease would be a rare measurement of secular orbital evolution in a CV above the period gap, and the J045707 beat-period detection and J0958 orbital-period determination would add useful constraints on accretion geometry and system parameters. The paper's strengths include the use of the long TESS baseline, the explicit 99% confidence evaluation for periodogram peaks, and the generally cautious language in labeling the J0958 and V842 Cen periods as provisional. However, the headline V1460 Her period derivative and the V842 Cen 56.5 s spin claim rest on assumptions that are not demonstrated in the current manuscript, so the significance of the paper is conditional on the requested control analyses.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3.1.2 (Eq. 1, Fig. 2)] The quadratic O-C fit that yields dP/dt = -(3.9±0.2)×10^-10 s/s combines 39 AAVSO and 1377 TESS minima without any allowance for a constant timing offset between the two datasets. The AAVSO points are sparse, heterogeneous (visual/CCD, multiple filters), and largely precede the TESS epochs; a systematic offset between the datasets would appear as a step-like discontinuity in the O-C diagram that a parabola could partially absorb, and a slowly varying offset would directly mimic curvature comparable to the quoted Pdot. The manuscript reports only a linear ephemeris after excluding AAVSO (with a 0.024 s period difference), not a TESS-only quadratic O-C fit. The quoted uncertainty therefore reflects only statistical scatter. Please add a TESS-only parabolic fit and/or a joint fit with a free AAVSO-TESS offset, quote the parabolic coefficients and their uncertainties, and state explicitly how primary and secondary minima are assigned cycle numbers in the O-C construction.
  2. [Section 3.4.2 (Fig. 8d)] The paper states in Section 3.4.1 that no peak was found at 56.5, 56.825, or 113.6 s in the power spectra, yet Section 3.4.2 claims that folding at 56.5 s gives a clear periodic signal and the Conclusions state that TESS data indicate the presence of this periodicity. This is a post-hoc selection among three trial periods, and a folded light curve cannot support a periodicity claim when the corresponding periodogram peak is absent, especially without a quantitative significance estimate for the folded profile. Either demonstrate the 56.5 s peak in the periodogram with a false-alarm probability, or remove this claim and report the 3.555 h period as the only periodicity established for V842 Cen.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Table 2 vs Section 4.2] The J045707 orbital period is quoted as 6.09±0.02 h in Table 2 and as 6.093±0.002 h in Section 4.2; please harmonize the value and uncertainty.
  2. [Abstract vs Table 2] The beat period for J045707 is given as 1290.6±0.5 s in the abstract, 1290.5±0.2 s in Table 2, and 1290.5 s in Section 3.2.1; please make these numbers consistent.
  3. [Section 3.1.2] The statement that the ephemeris after excluding AAVSO differs by 0.024 s from Eq. (1) should include whether this difference is significant compared with the formal uncertainty of the period, rather than reporting only the raw difference.
  4. [Section 1] There is a typo in the first sentence: 'semi-detected interacting binary systems' should be 'semi-detached interacting binary systems'.
  5. [Figure 3b caption] The caption lists 'CTRS' among the facilities; this should be 'CRTS'.
  6. [Section 3.3.2 and Conclusions] The abstract labels the J0958 and V842 Cen periods as provisionally suggested, but the conclusions state that the J0958 orbital period 'has been determined'; please align the strength of these claims with the single-sector evidence.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: all headline results are measured or standard fits, with the apparent beat period independently present in the power spectrum.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are timing measurements from TESS photometry. The V1460 Her orbital period and its secular decrease come from a linear ephemeris and a parabolic O-C fit to eclipse minima (Eq. 1 and Fig. 2); the period derivative is a fitted output of the O-C residuals, not an input to the analysis, so it cannot reduce to its own premise by construction. The possible AAVSO/TESS zero-point offset is an unmodeled systematic that could affect the derivative, but that is a correctness risk, not circularity. For J045707, the 1290.5 s peak is an independent feature in the Lomb-Scargle periodogram (Fig. 4b); the authors compute P_omega-minus-Omega = 1290.4 s from the separately measured spin and orbital periods and then note the agreement with the observed peak. This is a consistency check, not a fitted parameter being relabeled as a prediction. The 6.11 h (J0958), 3.555 h (V842 Cen), and 56.5 s spin-folded signals are all obtained from the same power spectra and then folded for display; folding with the period used to create the phase plot is standard practice and does not introduce the result as an assumption. No load-bearing self-citations or imported uniqueness theorems appear in the derivation chain. The paper's limitations (e.g., lack of a TESS-only quadratic control) concern systematic robustness, not logical circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No invented entities are introduced. All periods are outputs of standard periodogram and phase-folding analyses with quoted uncertainties; the O-C quadratic term is the one fitted coefficient whose physical interpretation as a secular period change carries extra assumptions. The listed axioms are the statistical and astrophysical assumptions needed to turn those outputs into the paper's claims.

free parameters (1)
  • Quadratic coefficient of the V1460 Her O-C parabola = about -3.9e-10 s/s (1.23 s per century)
    Fitted to combined AAVSO and TESS eclipse timings; the claimed secular decrease of the orbital period is this fitted coefficient, so it is a measured fit parameter rather than an independent prediction.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Lomb-Scargle periodogram significances computed with Vaughan (2005) and an assumed white plus pink noise model, with blue noise omitted, identify true periodicities.
    Used for all four sources in Section 3; an incorrect noise model would change the 99% confidence levels and the claimed detections.
  • domain assumption Gaussian-fitted eclipse minima are stable phase markers and AAVSO and TESS timings can be combined without systematic zero-point offsets.
    Underpins the V1460 Her ephemeris and the parabolic O-C fit in Section 3.1.2; unmodeled offsets between surveys could generate a spurious period decrease.
  • domain assumption Standard intermediate polar accretion models link spin-frequency power to disc-fed accretion and beat-frequency power to disc-overflow or stream-fed accretion.
    Used to classify J045707 and J0958 in Sections 4.2 and 4.3; these are accepted field phenomenology, not derived in this paper.
  • domain assumption Phase folding at 56.5 s, a period taken from Warner and Woudt (2015), can establish a spin signal even though the Lomb-Scargle periodogram shows no peak at that frequency.
    Underlies the V842 Cen spin claim in Section 3.4.2; folding at a period chosen from prior literature can create apparent periodicity by chance.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Precise Timing Analysis of Four Magnetic Cataclysmic Variables with TESS." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XMANMKUS

@misc{pith2026250604371,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Precise Timing Analysis of Four Magnetic Cataclysmic Variables with TESS},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XMANMKUS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.04371}
}
abstract

We analysed high time-resolution optical photometric data from the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) to study the timing behaviour of four intermediate polar-like objects, namely, V1460 Her, 1RXS J045707.4+452751, Swift J0958.0-4208, and V842 Cen. In the case of V1460 Her, we refined the measurement of its orbital period. Long-term observations suggest a gradual decrease in the orbital period of V1460 Her, and the stable light curve during the TESS observations indicates its quiescent state. We detected a beat period of 1290.6 $\pm$ 0.5 s for the first time for the source 1RXS J045707.4+452751, suggesting a possible disc-overflow accretion scenario. For the sources Swift J0958.0-4208 and V842 Cen, we determined periods 6.11 $\pm$ 0.02 h and 3.555 $\pm$ 0.005 h, respectively, which can be provisionally suggested to be orbital periods. These findings provide valuable insights into the accretion processes and long-term evolution of these intriguing binary systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.04371 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Long-term light curve of V1460 Her (see text for detail). (b)TESS light curve of approximately two consecutive days of observations of V1460 Her for sector 24. (c) AAVSO-CV light curve of V1460 Her of three consecutive days. (d) TESS power spectra of all combined TESS dataset of V1460 Her, where the identified frequencies are marked with red vertical dashed lines. The green dashed line represents the 99% confide… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Observed minus calculated (O-C) diagram for V1460 Her. days. The eclipsing nature of the light curves was clearly evident, with two eclipse-like profiles. The bigger dip in the flux was considered a primary eclipse, whereas the lower dip was consid￾ered a secondary eclipse. The time series data from all seven sec￾tors were separately analysed using the Lomb-Scargle (LS) pe￾riodogram (Lomb 1976; Scargle 1982) method … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Day-wise orbital phase folded light curve of V1460 Her of all sectors. The color bar on the right side indicates the normalised flux. (b) Orbital phase folded light curves of V1460 Her observed using the SuperWASP, CTRS, ASAS-SN, AAVSO, TESS, and ZTF facilities at different epochs. The color schemes of the light curve are similar to Figure 1a. The epochs (in the year) are shown at the top of each panel. The phas… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) TESS light curve of approximately two consecutive days of J0958 from the observation of sector 9. (b) TESS power spectra of J0958 for sector 9, where the identified frequencies are marked. The green horizontal dashed lines represent the 99% confidence level. The ω …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Orbital and (b) Spin phase folded light curve of J045707 with a binning of 20. (c) Day-wise spin phase folded light curve of J045707 with a bin size of 0.05. The color bar represents the normalised flux 1545 1545.5 1546 BJD (2457000+) 20 40 60 80 PDCSAP Flux (a) Re…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a) TESS light curve of approximately 4 h of V842 Cen from the observation of 20 s cadence data of sector 38. (b) TESS power spectra of V842 Cen for 20 s cadence data of sector 38, where the identified frequency is marked in red dashed line. The green horizontal dashed…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Cataclysmic Variables Photometric Periods from TESS

    astro-ph.SR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    TESS photometry yields coherent periods for 1,362 CVs, including roughly 465–565 first determinations, and confirms the 2–3 h period gap with a median period near 3.68 h.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    1973, Progress of Theoretical Physics, 49, 1184

    Aizu, K. 1973, Progress of Theoretical Physics, 49, 1184

    1973

  2. [2]

    1996, MNRAS, 279, 1345

    Allan, A., Horne, K., Hellier, C., et al. 1996, MNRAS, 279, 1345

    work page 1996

  3. [3]

    P., Marsh, T

    Ashley, R. P., Marsh, T. R., Breedt, E., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 499, 149

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    C., Kulkarni, S

    Bellm, E. C., Kulkarni, S. R., Graham, M. J., et al. 2019, PASP, 131, 018002

    2019

  5. [5]

    2015, MNRAS, 453, 3100

    Bernardini, F., de Martino, D., Mukai, K., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 453, 3100

    2015

  6. [6]

    2017, MNRAS, 470, 4815

    Bernardini, F., de Martino, D., Mukai, K., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 470, 4815

    2017

  7. [7]

    1990, Space Sci

    Cropper, M. 1990, Space Sci. Rev., 54, 195

    work page 1990

  8. [8]

    J., Djorgovski, S

    Drake, A. J., Djorgovski, S. G., Mahabal, A., et al. 2009, ApJ, 696, 870

    2009

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    J., Djorgovski, S

    Drake, A. J., Djorgovski, S. G., Mahabal, A. A., et al. 2016, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 9319, 1

    2016

  2. [10]

    & Wickramasinghe, D

    Ferrario, L. & Wickramasinghe, D. T. 1999, MNRAS, 309, 517

    1999

  3. [11]

    J., Hey, D., et al

    Hart, K., Shappee, B. J., Hey, D., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2304.03791

    2023 arXiv

  4. [12]

    1991, MNRAS, 251, 693

    Hellier, C. 1991, MNRAS, 251, 693

    1991

  5. [13]

    1993, MNRAS, 265, L35

    Hellier, C. 1993, MNRAS, 265, L35

    1993

  6. [14]

    O., Smale, A

    Hellier, C., Mason, K. O., Smale, A. P., et al. 1989b, MNRAS, 238, 1107 Kálmán, S., Csizmadia, S., Pál, A., & Szabó, G. M. 2025, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 9, 33

    2025

  7. [15]

    L., Gaensler, B

    Kaplan, D. L., Gaensler, B. M., Kulkarni, S. R., & Slane, P. O. 2006, ApJS, 163, 344

    2006

  8. [16]

    P., Popov, V

    Kjurkchieva, D. P., Popov, V . A., Vasileva, D. L., & Petrov, N. I. 2017, New A, 52, 8

    2017

  9. [17]

    E., Norton, A

    Lohr, M. E., Norton, A. J., Kolb, U. C., et al. 2013, A&A, 549, A86

    2013

  10. [18]

    Lomb, N. R. 1976, Ap&SS, 39, 447

    1976

  11. [19]

    Luna, G. J. M., Diaz, M. P., Brickhouse, N. S., & Moraes, M. 2012, MNRAS, 423, L75

    2012

  12. [20]

    2012, A&A, 538, A123

    Masetti, N., Parisi, P., Jiménez-Bailón, E., et al. 2012, A&A, 538, A123

    2012

  13. [21]

    2010, A&A, 519, A96

    Masetti, N., Parisi, P., Palazzi, E., et al. 2010, A&A, 519, A96

    2010

  14. [22]

    2013, A&A, 556, A120

    Masetti, N., Parisi, P., Palazzi, E., et al. 2013, A&A, 556, A120

    2013

  15. [23]

    McNaught, R. H. & Mattei, J. A. 1986, IAU Circ., 4284, 4 O’Connell, D. J. K. 1951, Publications of the Riverview College Observatory, 2, 85

    1986

  16. [24]

    1994, PASP, 106, 209

    Patterson, J. 1994, PASP, 106, 209

    1994

  17. [25]

    R., Ashley, R

    Pelisoli, I., Marsh, T. R., Ashley, R. P., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 507, 6132

    2021

  18. [26]

    L., Skillen, I., Collier Cameron, A., et al

    Pollacco, D. L., Skillen, I., Collier Cameron, A., et al. 2006, The W ASP Project and the SuperW ASP Cameras

    2006

  19. [27]

    B., Han, Z

    Qian, S. B., Han, Z. T., Zhang, B., et al. 2017, ApJ, 848, 131

    2017

  20. [28]

    Rappaport, S., Verbunt, F., & Joss, P. C. 1983, ApJ, 275, 713

    1983

  21. [29]

    R., Winn, J

    Ricker, G. R., Winn, J. N., Vanderspek, R., et al. 2015, Journal of Astronomical

    2015

  22. [30]

    R., Mason, K

    Rosen, S. R., Mason, K. O., & Cordova, F. A. 1988, MNRAS, 231, 549

    1988

  23. [31]

    Scargle, J. D. 1982, ApJ, 263, 835

    1982

  24. [32]

    2016, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 9122, 1

    Scaringi, S., Mason, E., Van Winckel, H., & Escorza, A. 2016, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 9122, 1

    2016

  25. [33]

    R., Gänsicke, B

    Schreiber, M. R., Gänsicke, B. T., Rebassa-Mansergas, A., et al. 2010, A&A, 513, L7

    2010

  26. [34]

    W., Fairall, A

    Sekiguchi, K., Feast, M. W., Fairall, A. P., & Winkler, H. 1989, MNRAS, 241, 311

    1989

  27. [35]

    J., Prieto, J

    Shappee, B. J., Prieto, J. L., Grupe, D., et al. 2014, ApJ, 788, 48

    2014

  28. [36]

    M., Szkody, P., Mukadam, A., et al

    Sion, E. M., Szkody, P., Mukadam, A., et al. 2013, ApJ, 772, 116

    2013

  29. [37]

    F., Doroshenko, V ., & Werner, K

    Suleimanov, V . F., Doroshenko, V ., & Werner, K. 2019, MNRAS, 482, 3622

    2019

  30. [38]

    Thorstensen, J. R. & Halpern, J. 2013, AJ, 146, 107

    2013

  31. [39]

    2005, A&A, 431, 391

    Vaughan, S. 2005, A&A, 431, 391

    2005

  32. [40]

    1986, MNRAS, 219, 751

    Warner, B. 1986, MNRAS, 219, 751

    1986

  33. [41]

    1995, Cambridge Astrophysics Series, 28

    Warner, B. 1995, Cambridge Astrophysics Series, 28

    1995

  34. [42]

    & Woudt, P

    Warner, B. & Woudt, P. A. 2015, Mem. Soc. Astron. Italiana, 86, 108

    2015

  35. [43]

    Woudt, P. A. & Warner, B. 2003, MNRAS, 340, 1011

    2003

  36. [44]

    A., Warner, B., Osborne, J., & Page, K

    Woudt, P. A., Warner, B., Osborne, J., & Page, K. 2009, MNRAS, 395, 2177

    2009

  37. [45]

    2017, AJ, 154, 276 Article number, page 9 of 9

    Zola, S., Szkody, P., Ciprini, S., et al. 2017, AJ, 154, 276 Article number, page 9 of 9

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.