Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 219 references

TESS photometry through sector 102 yields coherent, stable photometric periods for 1,362 cataclysmic variables — 565 for the first time — and a period distribution that preserves the 2–3 hour gap with a median near 3.68 hours.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 07:46 UTC pith:XAZFNT55

load-bearing objection Large TESS CV period catalog with genuine new measurements, but the population-level claims lean on an unvalidated dominant-peak-as-orbital assumption. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.08727 v3 pith:XAZFNT55 submitted 2026-07-09 astro-ph.SR

Cataclysmic Variables Photometric Periods from TESS

S. O. Kepler , Alejandra Daniela Romero , Larissa Luciano Amorim , Marcos Perez Diaz This is my paper
classification astro-ph.SR
keywords cataclysmic variablesTESS photometryphotometric periodsorbital periodsperiod gapintermediate polarsspin periodswhite dwarf rotation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper aims to establish a homogeneous, TESS-based photometric period catalog for known cataclysmic variables — close binaries where a white dwarf accretes from a companion star. Analyzing TESS data through sector 102, it claims coherent and stable period detections for 1,362 of the 1,557 surveyed CVs, including first-time period determinations for 565 systems, with a pixel-level localization check to ensure the variability is not coming from a neighboring star in TESS's 21-arcsecond pixels. It further claims that the full sample's period distribution reproduces the canonical 2–3 hour period gap — the evolutionary bottleneck where magnetic braking stalls and mass transfer halts — with a median photometric period near 3.68 hours, about half the median rotation period of field white dwarfs. If correct, this is the largest homogeneous period sample for CVs to date and a resource for testing how angular momentum loss shapes binary-star evolution.

Core claim

Working from TESS 120 s and 20 s photometry through sector 102, the paper detects coherent, stable periodic variations in 1,362 of 1,557 known cataclysmic variables (white dwarfs accreting from a companion). For 286 systems showing eclipses or ellipsoidal variations, the orbital period is read directly from the folded light curve; for the rest, the orbital period is taken as the highest-amplitude Fourier peak. It reports first-time photometric periods for 565 CVs and spin periods for 82 intermediate polars, and finds the full period distribution retains the 2–3 h gap, with a median near 3.68 h — about half the 6.80 h median rotation period of field white dwarfs. A pixel-level localization ch

What carries the argument

The analysis rests on the Fourier transform of normalized, per-sector TESS light curves concatenated across all sectors in which each star was observed, with a false-alarm-probability threshold of 1/1000 set by reshuffling the data; the search spans roughly 240 s (the Nyquist limit of the 120 s cadence) to about 13 days. Two assumptions carry the argument: the working rule that the highest-amplitude coherent peak is the orbital period unless the folded light curve reveals eclipses or ellipsoidal variations, and a pixel-level localization check that confirms the detected signal originates from the target CV rather than a contaminating neighbor. The paper also uses the harmonic structure and p

Load-bearing premise

For the roughly four-fifths of systems without eclipses or ellipsoidal variations, the paper equates the largest-amplitude Fourier peak with the orbital period — a step its own AT Cnc example shows can mislabel a superhump as the orbit.

What would settle it

Pick a random subset of the 565 newly-perioded, non-eclipsing CVs and measure radial velocities to obtain true orbital periods; if the TESS dominant period mismatches the spectroscopic orbit in more than ~10% of cases, the full-sample distribution, the median, and the 'gap remains' result would need recomputation, and the catalog would have to flag the type of each period.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The 1,362-system catalog offers the community a homogeneous reference in which every period comes from the same instrument, cadence, and analysis pipeline — a base for population and luminosity-function studies of CVs.
  • If the 2–3 h gap persists in the full photometric sample despite the ~11% of systems inside it, the standard evolutionary picture — magnetic braking halting mass transfer until gravitational radiation drives the stars back into contact — is supported by the largest TESS-based sample to date.
  • The 82 intermediate-polar spin periods (17 new) and the absence of a period gap for IPs extend the empirical basis for white-dwarf spin-up and synchronization studies.
  • The factor-of-two relation between the CV median photometric period (~3.68 h) and the field white-dwarf median rotation period (~6.80 h) supplies a concrete, testable link between angular momentum loss in interacting and single white-dwarf binaries.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the 'gap remains' claim inherits the dominant-peak assumption for the ~80% of systems without eclipses; the paper's own AT Cnc case (Section 3.1.4) shows a superhump outshining the orbit, so the safest evolutionary statements rest on the 286 geometric (eclipse/ellipsoidal) periods.
  • Beyond the paper: since only ~72% of photometric periods agree with published orbital periods within 30%, roughly a quarter of the catalog entries are probably harmonics, daily aliases, or superhumps rather than true orbits; users should treat the table as photometric periods except for the eclipsing/ellipsoidal class.
  • Beyond the paper: internal counts differ across the manuscript — 1,557 vs 1,554 objects analyzed, 565 vs 465 new periods, medians of 3.674/3.681/3.689 h, and 'sector 102' vs 'sector 101' — so the census numbers need reconciliation before the distribution is used quantitatively.
  • Beyond the paper: a testable extension is to recompute the period gap and the white-dwarf comparison using only the 286 eclipse/ellipsoidal systems; if the gap boundaries or the median shift noticeably, the dominant-peak rule is biasing the full-sample statistics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents TESS photometric period determinations for 1362 cataclysmic variables (CVs) using 120 s and 20 s light curves through sector 102. Periods are derived from Fourier transforms with a FAP-based detection threshold, and TESS-Localize is used to check that the variability originates from the target. The catalog includes 286 eclipsing/ellipsoidal systems, 63 polars, and 135–136 intermediate polars, with spin periods reported for 82–83 IPs. The authors claim to recover the 2–3 h CV period gap, report a median photometric period of about 3.68 h, and compare the period distribution with that of likely single white dwarfs. The paper also provides new period determinations for several hundred CVs and discusses individual cases where the TESS peak is not the orbital period.

Significance. If the period identifications are reliable, this is the largest homogeneous TESS-based photometric period catalog for CVs to date and a valuable community resource. The eclipsing/ellipsoidal subsample (286 systems) gives a robust, orbit-based period distribution and independently shows a period gap. The use of TESS-Localize for contamination checks and the machine-readable tables are concrete strengths. However, the complete-sample claims — the gap, the median, and the agreement with literature — rest on the assumption that the dominant Fourier peak is the orbital period for non-eclipsing systems, and the paper itself provides a counterexample (AT Cnc). The internal validation statistics are also inconsistent. The catalog and the eclipsing-subset results are likely salvageable, but the population-level conclusions need re-analysis or explicit limitation.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3, §3.1.4] The central claim that the complete-sample period distribution shows the period gap and a median of 3.68 h depends on the rule stated in §3: 'we consider the orbital period to correspond to the peak of the highest amplitude in the FT unless additional information is available in the light curve.' Section 3.1.4 (AT Cnc) is an explicit counterexample: the largest TESS peak is a 19445 s superhump, while the orbital period is 17434 s. For the ~80% of non-eclipsing systems, no additional light-curve information is usually available. The complete-sample gap/median are therefore not established. Please validate the dominant-peak rule for non-eclipsing systems against spectroscopically determined orbital periods, or restrict the population claims to the eclipsing/ellipsoidal subsample.
  2. [§3 vs §4.1/§5] The agreement with literature periods is quoted inconsistently: §3 reports 65% agreement within 30%, while §4.1 and §5 report 72% within 30%. This is not a minor typo, because the agreement rate is the quantitative basis for trusting the dominant-peak identification. Furthermore, a 30% tolerance is too coarse to distinguish a superhump (period excess typically 3–15%) from an orbital period. Please provide one consistent statistic and, ideally, report agreement separately for eclipsing/ellipsoidal systems and the rest of the sample.
  3. [Abstract, §3, §3.4, §5, Table 3] The headline numbers are internally inconsistent. The abstract and §5 say 565 CVs have first photometric period determinations, while §3 says 465 objects. The abstract says spin periods for 83 IPs; §3.4 and §5 say 82. Section 3.4 states 'We identified 136 CVs as IPs' but then 'Of the 135 previously classified as IP CVs.' The sample size is 1554 in §2 and 1557 in the abstract and Table 3. Since the catalog is a primary product, these inconsistencies must be resolved before the results can be used.
  4. [Abstract, §5] The abstract states data through sector 102, while §5 says 'up to sector 101.' This is a basic data-set descriptor that must be consistent. Likewise, §3.2 says 1004 objects (74%) with periods up to 6 h, while the Figure 10 caption says 1000 objects (73%). Please correct these mismatches.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.2] The text defines the period gap as 'between ~2 and ~3 h' but later uses the literature range 2.15–3.18 h. Please state explicitly which definition is used for the gap statistics.
  2. [§3.4] The expected IP spin-to-orbital ratio is given as '10% to 1%' in §3.4, but §5 says '0.1—0.01%'. These differ by two orders of magnitude. Please correct.
  3. [§3.3, Figure 12] The text says 286 eclipsing/ellipsoidal systems, and Figure 12 shows 205 with periods up to 6 h. The caption should state this explicitly to avoid confusion.
  4. [§2] The FAP detection threshold is described as 'FAP=1/1000, calculated by reshuffling the data 1000 times.' The empirical scaling '4<A>' and '5<A>' is useful, but the definition of <A> could be clearer.
  5. [§3.1.3] RS Oph is included in the catalog despite the detected periods being explicitly not orbital and TESS-Localize being ambiguous. This is defensible, but the catalog should have a machine-readable flag for such cases so that users do not treat these as orbital periods.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: the catalog is an observational measurement study; periods come from TESS Fourier transforms and literature comparisons, not from fitted parameters or self-referential definitions.

full rationale

This paper is an observational catalog paper. The central output — photometric periods for 1362 CVs — is obtained directly from TESS light curves via Fourier analysis, with FAP = 1/1000 significance threshold, visual inspection, and TESS-Localize contamination checks. There is no fitted parameter that is later renamed a prediction, no equation in which an output is defined as an input, and no derivation chain that reduces to itself. The dominant-peak rule in Section 3 ('we consider the orbital period to correspond to the peak of the highest amplitude in the FT unless additional information is available in the light curve') is an identification assumption, not a circular construction: it does not define the measured period as the quantity being predicted, nor is the subsequent period distribution forced by that rule in a way that would make the comparison with literature vacuous. The authors explicitly acknowledge counterexamples (AT Cnc, TIC 008389151) where the largest peak is not the orbit, showing that the rule is applied with case-by-case judgment rather than by construction. Self-citations appear only as methodological references (Kepler 1993 for false-alarm statistics, Oliveira da Rosa et al. 2024 as an external comparison sample, Amorim et al. 2023 for a magnetic-field measurement) and are not load-bearing in any circular sense; the comparison to white-dwarf rotation periods is a benchmark comparison, not an input to the period determinations. The internal inconsistency between 65% and 72% literature-agreement figures, and the abstract/section discrepancy between 565 and 465 new periods, are real correctness/consistency concerns but are not circularity. The 2–3 h period gap and median claims rest on the photometric-period identification assumption for non-eclipsing systems, which is a scientific risk that deserves validation, but this is not a self-referential or definitional reduction. The derivation is self-contained with respect to circularity, so the score is 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is an observational catalog; no fitted parameters or invented entities are introduced. The main assumptions are that detected periods belong to the CV and that the dominant period is orbital for non-eclipsing systems. Both are partially tested but not proven, and they directly affect the complete-sample period-gap and median claims.

axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Every source included in the sample is actually a cataclysmic variable, as classified by the literature catalogs used for sample selection.
    Section 2 builds the sample from Downes et al. 2001, Schaefer 2022, Inight et al. 2023/2025, Canbay et al. 2023, Bruch 2025, and Dağ et al. 2026. If a star is not a CV, its period contaminates the population statistics.
  • domain assumption For non-eclipsing CVs, the highest-amplitude coherent Fourier peak represents the orbital (or dominant photometric) period.
    Section 3 states 'we consider the orbital period to correspond to the peak of the highest amplitude in the FT unless additional information is available in the light curve.' The AT Cnc example in Section 3.1.4 shows the dominant peak can be a superhump, so this assumption is load-bearing and not universally valid.
  • standard math A peak above FAP=1/1000, computed by 1000 data reshufflings, is a real periodicity rather than noise.
    Section 2 describes the false-alarm probability calculation following Kepler 1993. This controls false positives statistically but does not identify the physical origin of the periodicity.
  • domain assumption TESS-Localize correctly assigns detected variability to the target CV rather than a nearby star.
    Section 2 says TESS-Localize is used 'to ensure that the detected period originates from the system of interest.' For blended fields (e.g., Tau 4 in Section 3.1.7), the localization is probabilistic and can be inconclusive, so this assumption is only partially tested.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 27763 in / 13442 out tokens · 144479 ms · 2026-08-02T07:46:32.824884+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a sample of coherent and stable photometric period determinations for cataclysmic variables, based on TESS photometry through sector 102. We analyzed a total of 1557 cataclysmic variable stars and detected periodic variations in 1362 objects, including 286 eclipsing or ellipsoidal-variation systems, 63 polars, and 135 intermediate polars. In particular, we present the first determination of the optical variability period for 565 cataclysmic variables. Due to the 21x21" pixel size of TESS, we tested whether the variability was coming from the cataclysmic variable and not from a nearby star. For the intermediate polars, we detected spin periods in addition to orbital periods for 83 systems. We detect a clear period gap between ~2 and ~3 h in the eclipsing sample, consistent with previous work. The gap remains for the complete sample of photometric variability periods. There is no apparent gap in the orbital period distribution for intermediate polars. Finally, the median of the photometric period distribution of our complete sample of cataclysmic variables is 3.681 h. Comparing this to the distribution of rotation periods for likely single white dwarfs, we find a similar range, with a median photometric period of 6.803~h.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.08727 by Alejandra Daniela Romero, Larissa Luciano Amorim, Marcos Perez Diaz, S. O. Kepler.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Fourier Transform for TIC 0118250418, considering the two sectors observed. The periods are in hours, and the peaks are indicated in the figure. The horizontal red line corresponds to the false-alarm probability FAP=1/1000 detection limit. dominant period. The first and second harmonics are also present. For 286 systems exhibiting eclipses or ellipsoidal varia￾tionsin their light curves, the orbital period… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Relative flux as a function of time in BJD for VW Hyi, TIC 25133286, an SU UMa-type dwarf novae with G=13.837. It was observed by TESS in sectors 1-13, 27, U29-U37, U39, 61-69, 87-90, 93-98. Note the several peaks indicating bursts that can reach up to 20 times the mean relative flux. The lower panel shows the Fourier transform of the concatenated data in the region of the literature orbital period P=6417.… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Time series analysis for TIC 008389151. Top panel: Fourier transform of all data. The periods are in hours, and the peak periods are indicated in the figure. The horizontal red line corresponds to the false-alarm probability FAP=1/1000 detection limit. Middle panel (bottom panel): phase-folded light curve over 4.1628 h (8.3256 h). The red dashed line represents a sinusoid with the largest amplitude peak. l… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Orbital period determination of T Leo from Shafter & Szkody (1984), their [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Phase-folded light curve for GK Per from the TESS data. The upper panel shows the light curve folded at the largest-amplitude peak, the first harmonic, while the lower panel shows it folded at twice that frequency. The power spectrum is dominated by a strong signal at twice the orbital frequency and a much smaller one at Ω, mainly due to the ellipsoidal variations of the secondary star. 2750 2800 2850 2900… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Fourier transform, periodogram, and light curve for the two 20 s-per-exposure sectors 71 and 72 of AT Cnc. The largest-am￾plitude peak in the periodogram is from the superhumps, with a period of 19445.49 s, which is visible in the light curve. The FT shows both the 120 s data (in black) and the 20 s data (in green). The orbital period is 17434.27 s. The FAP(1/1000)=0.86 mma is shown as a horizontal blue li… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Fourier transform of the TESS light curve for Tau 4. The green vertical line indicates the position of the spectroscopically estimated orbital period from Howell et al. (2008). thereby determining the location and width of the period gap (Howell et al. 2001; Knigge et al. 2011b; Zhou et al. 2026). In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Spin period determination of GK Per from the TESS data. The black curve shows the Fourier transform of the single sector observed at 20 s per exposure. The red line is the corresponding false-alarm-probability FAP(1/1000) line. The green curve shows the Fourier transform of the concatenated light curves from all sec￾tors, the 120 s exposures, and the blue line shows the corresponding FAP(1/1000) [PITH_FUL… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Distribution of photometric periods of the 1000 CVs (73%) from our sample with periods up to 6 h. The period values obtained in this work using TESS data are shown in red, while those from the literature are shown in blue [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Photometric period distribution for novae, up to 6 h. median of the distribution of novae is 12 104 s, or 3.362 h. Interestingly, the short-period, low-angular-momentum-loss systems (<3 h) outnumber the longer-period ones. Given the small number of novae compared to the total sample, we do [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Period distribution for the sample of IPs (upper), polars (middle), and single magnetic white dwarfs (bottom), with periods up to 8 h. The vertical dashed line indicates the median value of the period distribution for the sample presented in this work. For the IPs and polars, we include the period distribution from the literature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Distribution of periods for the 205 CVs classified as eclipsing or showing ellipsoidal variations with orbital periods up to 6 h, with a median of 3.48 h. 3.4. Magnetic CV In this section, we focus on magnetic CVs, i.e., polars (𝐵 ≳ 10 MG) and intermediate polars (IPs), in which the magnetic field (𝐵 ≳ 0.1 MG) influences mass accretion onto the white dwarf. Polar CVs are systems in which the magnetic fiel… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Comparison between the periods determined in this work from photometric data and the 792 orbital periods reported in the literature. Only periods up to 25 h are considered in the plot (679 systems). The dashed lines indicate the 1 × 2 (period from the literature is 2× the period from this work), 1 × 1, and 2 × 1 (period from this work is 2× the period from the literature) correspondences. The literature v… view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: we show the period distribution for the sample pre￾sented in Oliveira da Rosa et al. (2024) (red), along with the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_16.png] view at source ↗

Review history (3 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

219 extracted references · 72 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    , keywords =

    Coherent brightness modulations in the dwarf nova AT Cancri. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.newast.2018.09.001 , archivePrefix =. 1809.05640 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  2. [2]

    The system SDSS J121209.31+013627.7

    X-ray orbital modulation of a white dwarf accreting from an L dwarf. The system SDSS J121209.31+013627.7. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201630038 , archivePrefix =. 1701.02894 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  3. [3]

    The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    The Orbital Period of 4U 1210-64. The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

  4. [4]

    , keywords =

    Comments on radial white dwarf accretion. , keywords =

  5. [5]

    , keywords =

    Particle heated atmospheres of magnetic white dwarfs. , keywords =

  6. [6]

    , keywords =

    Convection and rotation boosted prescription of magnetic braking: application to the formation of extremely low-mass white dwarfs. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1916 , archivePrefix =. 2107.03952 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  7. [7]

    , keywords =

    Probing the Mysteries of the X-Ray Binary 4U 1210-64 with ASM, PCA, MAXI, BAT, and Suzaku. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/793/2/77 , archivePrefix =. 1407.7050 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  8. [10]

    , keywords =

    A Near-Infrared Spectroscopic Study of the Accreting Magnetic White Dwarf SDSS J121209.31+013627.7 and Its Substellar Companion. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/524933 , archivePrefix =. 0710.4969 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [11]

    , keywords =

    Detection of a Variable Infrared Excess around SDSS J121209.31+013627.7. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/507486 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0607151 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  10. [12]

    , keywords =

    Discovery of a Magnetic White Dwarf/Probable Brown Dwarf Short-Period Binary. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/491702 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0508043 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  11. [13]

    Astronomy Letters , keywords =

    On Accretion in the Polar V379 Vir. Astronomy Letters , keywords =. doi:10.1134/S1063773725700239 , archivePrefix =. 2506.17674 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  12. [14]

    , keywords =

    Analysis of hydrogen-rich magnetic white dwarfs detected in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912570 , archivePrefix =. 0907.2372 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [15]

    , keywords =

    Cataclysmic variables around the period-bounce: An eROSITA-enhanced multiwavelength catalog. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449358 , archivePrefix =. 2401.17298 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [16]

    , keywords =

    New Close Binary Systems from the SDSS-I (Data Release Five) and the Search for Magnetic White Dwarfs in Cataclysmic Variable Progenitor Systems. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/519242 , archivePrefix =. 0704.0789 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  15. [17]

    , keywords =

    Evolution of cataclysmic variables under different magnetic braking prescriptions. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556958 , archivePrefix =. 2602.05260 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  16. [18]

    The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    Identification of two INTEGRAL sources with SWIFT/XRT. The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

  17. [19]

    Unveiling the nature of INTEGRAL objects through optical spectroscopy. VII. Identification of 20 Galactic and extragalactic hard X-ray sources. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200811322 , archivePrefix =. 0811.4085 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [20]

    , keywords =

    The peculiar high-mass X-ray binary 1ES 1210-646. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913404 , archivePrefix =. 1001.0568 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  19. [21]

    Information Bulletin on Variable Stars , year = 1986, month = jul, volume =

    Behaviour of AT Cancri in the Season 1985/86. Information Bulletin on Variable Stars , year = 1986, month = jul, volume =

    1985

  20. [24]

    arXiv (Cornell University) , author=

    Can friction of the nova envelope account for the extra angular momentum loss in cataclysmic variables? , url=. arXiv (Cornell University) , author=

  21. [26]

    , keywords =

    The intermediate polar cataclysmic variable GK Persei 120 years after the nova explosion: a first dynamical mass study. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2547 , archivePrefix =. 2107.06932 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  22. [27]

    IAU Colloquium 190: Magnetic Cataclysmic Variables , year = 2004, editor =

    The Spin-Up Rate of the White Dwarf in GK Per. IAU Colloquium 190: Magnetic Cataclysmic Variables , year = 2004, editor =

    2004

  23. [29]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Influence of mass transfer stability on the formation of post-common-envelope binaries. arXiv e-prints , keywords =

  24. [30]

    , keywords =

    Unevenly-sampled signals: a general formalism for the Lomb-Scargle periodogram. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014079 , archivePrefix =. 1006.2473 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [31]

    arXiv , Author =:1307.6212 , Journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 , Eid =. arXiv , Author =:1307.6212 , Journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [32]

    , keywords =

    The Astropy Project: Building an Open-science Project and Status of the v2.0 Core Package. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f , archivePrefix =. 1801.02634 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  27. [33]

    , keywords =

    A modest change in magnetic braking at the fully convective boundary explains the evolution of cataclysmic variables. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202659326 , archivePrefix =. 2603.14560 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  28. [34]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics , author=

    Further evidence of saturated, boosted, and disrupted magnetic braking from evolutionary tracks of cataclysmic variables , url=. Astronomy and Astrophysics , author=

  29. [35]

    , keywords =

    Evolutionary Period Changes for 52 Cataclysmic Variables, and the Failure for the Most-fundamental Prediction of the Magnetic Braking Model. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad31a9 , archivePrefix =. 2404.12525 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [36]

    , keywords =

    Comprehensive listing of 156 reliable orbital periods for novae, including 49 new periods. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2089 , archivePrefix =. 2207.02932 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [37]

    , keywords =

    A catalogue of ultracompact mass-transferring white dwarf binaries. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554925 , archivePrefix =. 2505.10535 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [38]

    , keywords =

    X-ray spectroscopy method of white dwarf mass determination in intermediate polars: External systematic uncertainties. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554368 , archivePrefix =. 2506.03711 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [39]

    , keywords =

    A systematic search for orbital periods of polars with TESS: Methods, detection limits, and results. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554948 , archivePrefix =. 2510.09165 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  34. [40]

    , keywords =

    A Catalogue of Orbital Periods of Cataclysmic Variables and Candidates from TESS Observations. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stag514 , archivePrefix =. 2603.03539 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  35. [44]

    , keywords =

    TESS light curves of cataclysmic variables - II - Superhumps in old novae and novalike variables. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3493 , archivePrefix =. 2212.04424 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  36. [47]

    , keywords =

    Catalog of Magnetic White Dwarfs with Hydrogen Dominated Atmospheres. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acaf6e , archivePrefix =. 2301.08862 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  37. [48]

    , keywords =

    TESS light curves of cataclysmic variables - I - Unknown periods in long-known stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1650 , archivePrefix =. 2207.08203 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  38. [49]

    , keywords =

    TESS light curves of cataclysmic variables - III - More superhump systems among old novae and nova-like variables. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2089 , archivePrefix =. 2308.16106 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [50]

    , keywords =

    A Catalog and Atlas of Cataclysmic Variables: The Living Edition. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/320802 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0102302 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [51]

    , keywords =

    A catalogue of cataclysmic variables from 20 yr of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey with new classifications, periods, trends, and oddities. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2018 , archivePrefix =. 2304.06749 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  41. [52]

    , keywords =

    Cataclysmic variables from Sloan Digital Sky Survey - V (2020-2023) identified using machine learning. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2524 , archivePrefix =. 2406.19459 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  42. [53]

    , keywords =

    Galactic Model Parameters and Spatial Density of Cataclysmic Variables in the Gaia Era: New Constraints on Population Models. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/acbead , archivePrefix =. 2302.11568 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [57]

    Software and Cyberinfrastructure for Astronomy IV , year = 2016, editor =

    The TESS science processing operations center. Software and Cyberinfrastructure for Astronomy IV , year = 2016, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.2233418 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1117/12.2233418 2016

  44. [58]

    , keywords =

    Achieving Better Than 1 Minute Accuracy in the Heliocentric and Barycentric Julian Dates. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/655938 , archivePrefix =. 1005.4415 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [61]

    The likely signature of nonlinear resonant mode coupling

    Amplitude and frequency variations of oscillation modes in the pulsating DB white dwarf star KIC 08626021. The likely signature of nonlinear resonant mode coupling. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526300 , archivePrefix =. 1510.06884 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  46. [62]

    , keywords =

    Localizing Sources of Variability in Crowded TESS Photometry. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/acb20c , archivePrefix =. 2204.06020 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  47. [63]

    Lightkurve: Kepler and TESS time series analysis in Python

  48. [64]

    Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society , keywords =

    TESS Science Processing Operations Center FFI Target List Products. Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2515-5172/abc9b3 , archivePrefix =. 2011.05495 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  49. [65]

    , keywords =

    An Exploration of the Paradigm for the 2-3 Hour Period Gap in Cataclysmic Variables. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/319776 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0005435 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  50. [67]

    , keywords =

    The Evolution of Cataclysmic Variables as Revealed by Their Donor Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/194/2/28 , archivePrefix =. 1102.2440 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [68]

    , keywords =

    Catalogue of cataclysmic binaries, low-mass X-ray binaries and related objects (Seventh edition). , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20030330 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0301444 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  52. [69]

    , keywords =

    Optical detection of the rapidly spinning white dwarf in V1460 Her. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2511 , archivePrefix =. 2109.00553 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  53. [70]

    , keywords =

    Photometric White Dwarf Rotation. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6987 , archivePrefix =. 2407.05214 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [76]

    , keywords =

    The Spin Periods and Magnetic Moments of White Dwarfs in Magnetic Cataclysmic Variables. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/423333 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0406363 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  55. [77]

    , keywords =

    The orbital period distribution of novae. , keywords =

  56. [79]

    , keywords =

    Cataclysmic variable candidates identified in eROSITA-DE DR1, XMM-Newton, Swift, and ROSAT catalogs. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452230 , archivePrefix =. 2504.10794 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  57. [81]

    , keywords =

    The orbital period versus absolute magnitude relationship of intermediate polars: implications for low states and outbursts. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1603 , archivePrefix =. 2305.15494 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  58. [84]

    , keywords =

    Characterizing high and low accretion states in VY Scl CVs using ZTF and TESS data. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2554 , archivePrefix =. 2411.07744 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  59. [85]

    , keywords =

    Spectroscopy of Seven Cataclysmic Variables with Periods above 5 Hours. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/382792 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0401316 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  60. [86]

    , keywords =

    Optical Studies of 20 Longer-Period Cataclysmic Binaries. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/657021 , archivePrefix =. 1009.1265 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  61. [87]

    Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society , keywords =

    New or Improved Orbital Periods of Cataclysmic Binaries. Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2515-5172/aa9d2a , archivePrefix =. 1711.09094 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  62. [88]

    , keywords =

    Radial Velocity Study of UZ Serpentis. , keywords =

  63. [89]

    American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts , year = 2002, series =

    Evidence of an accreting white dwarf during the 2002 optical outburst of the old nova GK Per(2001). American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts , year = 2002, series =

    2002

  64. [90]

    , keywords =

    The Eclipsing Cataclysmic Variable Lanning 386: Dwarf Nova, SW Sextantis Star, or Both?. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/529209 , archivePrefix =. 0801.3856 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  65. [94]

    , keywords =

    Follow-up Studies of Five Cataclysmic Variable Candidates Discovered by LAMOST. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aba7c7 , archivePrefix =. 2007.09285 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  66. [95]

    I A New Short Superhump Period Dwarf Nova, OT J055717+683226

    Dwarf Novae in the Shortest Orbital Period Regime. I A New Short Superhump Period Dwarf Nova, OT J055717+683226. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/pasj/62.1.187 , archivePrefix =. 0912.4321 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  67. [96]

    , keywords =

    Investigation of Superhumps in SU UMa-type Dwarf Novae Based on the Observations of TESS. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acebdf , archivePrefix =. 2405.11843 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  68. [97]

    , keywords =

    Optical Characterization of Two Cataclysmic Variables: RBS 0490 and SDSS J075939.79+191417.3. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac6026 , archivePrefix =. 2203.17198 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  69. [99]

    , keywords =

    Structure of the accretion flow of IX Velorum as revealed by high-resolution spectroscopy. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347183 , archivePrefix =. 2308.01102 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  70. [100]

    , keywords =

    Time resolved spectroscopy and photometry of three little known bright cataclysmic variables: LS IV -08 3, HQ Monocerotis and ST Chamaeleontis. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.newast.2016.07.011 , archivePrefix =. 1608.07181 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  71. [101]

    , keywords =

    Cyclical Period Changes in Cataclysmic Variables: A Statistical Study. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6b0e , archivePrefix =. 2408.07850 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  72. [107]

    , keywords =

    Total eclipse of the heart: the AM CVn Gaia14aae/ASSASN-14cn. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1224 , archivePrefix =. 1507.04663 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  73. [108]

    , keywords =

    Evidence for reduced magnetic braking in polars from binary population models. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3413 , archivePrefix =. 1910.06333 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1910

  74. [109]

    , keywords =

    The cataclysmic variable orbital period gap: More evident than ever. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348807 , archivePrefix =. 2402.02076 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  75. [110]

    , keywords =

    PolarCat: Catalog of polars, low-accretion rate polars, and candidate objects. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554519 , archivePrefix =. 2505.10337 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  76. [111]

    , keywords =

    The discovery of 321 S pulsations in the ROSAT HRI light curves of 1BMW J080622.8+152732 = RX J0806.3+1527. , keywords =

  77. [112]

    , keywords =

    Tidal Spin-up of Subdwarf B Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad7788 , archivePrefix =. 2408.16158 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  78. [113]

    Cataclysmic variable stars

  79. [114]

    , keywords =

    Thermal Timescale Mass Transfer and the Evolution of White Dwarf Binaries. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/380561 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0310126 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  80. [115]

    , keywords =

    A Volume-limited Sample of Cataclysmic Variables from Gaia DR2: Space Density and Population Properties. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa764 , archivePrefix =. 1907.13152 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1907

Showing first 80 references.