Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Unevenly-sampled signals: a general formalism of the Lomb-Scargle periodogram

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1006.2473 v1 pith:NID64OO5 submitted 2010-06-12 astro-ph.CO math-phmath.MPphysics.data-an

Unevenly-sampled signals: a general formalism of the Lomb-Scargle periodogram

classification astro-ph.CO math-phmath.MPphysics.data-an
keywords periodogramnoisewhencasecharacteristicsformalismgenerallomb-scargle
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The periodogram is a popular tool that tests whether a signal consists only of noise or if it also includes other components. The main issue of this method is to define a critical detection threshold that allows identification of a component other than noise, when a peak in the periodogram exceeds it. In the case of signals sampled on a regular time grid, determination of such a threshold is relatively simple. When the sampling is uneven, however, things are more complicated. The most popular solution in this case is to use the "Lomb-Scargle" periodogram, but this method can be used only when the noise is the realization of a zero-mean, white (i.e. flat-spectrum) random process. In this paper, we present a general formalism based on matrix algebra, which permits analysis of the statistical properties of a periodogram independently of the characteristics of noise (e.g. colored and/or non-stationary), as well as the characteristics of sampling.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Cataclysmic Variables Photometric Periods from TESS

    astro-ph.SR 2026-07 accept novelty 6.5

    TESS data give photometric periods for 1362 cataclysmic variables (hundreds new), confirming the 2–3 h gap, a sample median of 3.68 h, and spin periods for 83 intermediate polars.

  2. Cataclysmic Variables Photometric Periods from TESS

    astro-ph.SR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    TESS photometry yields coherent periods for 1,362 CVs, including roughly 465–565 first determinations, and confirms the 2–3 h period gap with a median period near 3.68 h.

  3. Cataclysmic Variables Photometric Periods from TESS

    astro-ph.SR 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    TESS photometry of 1,362 cataclysmic variables yields 565 new period measurements, confirms the 2–3 h period gap, and finds a median CV photometric period of 3.681 h.