Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Cataclysmic variables from Sloan Digital Sky Survey -- V (2020-2023) identified using machine learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.19459 v2 pith:BYQN7EIF submitted 2024-06-27 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GA

Cataclysmic variables from Sloan Digital Sky Survey -- V (2020-2023) identified using machine learning

classification astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GA
keywords candidatessdss-vspectrareportcataclysmicdataidentifiedinspection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

SDSS-V is carrying out a dedicated survey for white dwarfs, single and in binaries, and we report the analysis of the spectroscopy of 504 cataclysmic variables (CVs) and CV candidates obtained during the first 34 months of observations of SDSS-V. We developed a convolutional neural network (CNN) to aid with the identification of CV candidates among the over 2 million SDSS-V spectra obtained with the BOSS spectrograph. The CNN reduced the number of spectra that required visual inspection to $\simeq2$ per cent of the total. We identified 776 CV spectra among the CNN-selected candidates, plus an additional 27 CV spectra that the CNN misclassified, but that were found serendipitously by human inspection of the data. Analysing the SDSS-V spectroscopy and ancillary data of the 504 CVs in our sample, we report 61 new CVs, spectroscopically confirm 248 and refute 13 published CV candidates, and we report 82 new or improved orbital periods. We discuss the completeness and possible selection biases of the machine learning methodology, as well as the effectiveness of targeting CV candidates within SDSS-V. Finally, we re-assess the space density of CVs, and find $1.2\times 10^{-5}\,\mathrm{pc^{-3}}$.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Cataclysmic Variables Photometric Periods from TESS

    astro-ph.SR 2026-07 accept novelty 6.5

    TESS data give photometric periods for 1362 cataclysmic variables (hundreds new), confirming the 2–3 h gap, a sample median of 3.68 h, and spin periods for 83 intermediate polars.

  2. Cataclysmic variables from SRG/eROSITA: new systems from eRASS1

    astro-ph.SR 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0

    A Random Forest plus Gaia/eROSITA match yields 156 spectroscopically confirmed CVs from eRASS1, spanning subtypes, periods, and luminosities, with the method outperforming several published alternatives.

  3. SRG/eROSITA X-ray selected cataclysmic variable candidates observed in SDSS-V DR20

    astro-ph.SR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    eROSITA-selected SDSS-V DR20 spectroscopy yields 587 cataclysmic variables (274 known), including new nearby systems, AM CVns, and a low-accretion-rate polar.

  4. Cataclysmic Variables Photometric Periods from TESS

    astro-ph.SR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    TESS photometry yields coherent periods for 1,362 CVs, including roughly 465–565 first determinations, and confirms the 2–3 h period gap with a median period near 3.68 h.

  5. Cataclysmic Variables Photometric Periods from TESS

    astro-ph.SR 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    TESS photometry of 1,362 cataclysmic variables yields 565 new period measurements, confirms the 2–3 h period gap, and finds a median CV photometric period of 3.681 h.