REVIEW 3 cited by
Follow-up Studies of Five Cataclysmic Variable Candidates Discovered by LAMOST
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Follow-up Studies of Five Cataclysmic Variable Candidates Discovered by LAMOST
read the original abstract
We report follow-up observations of five cataclysmic variable candidates from LAMOST published by Hou et al. (2020). LAMOST J024048.51+195226.9 is the most unusual of the five; an early-M type secondary star contributes strongly to its spectrum, and its spectral and photometric behavior are strikingly reminiscent of the hitherto-unique propeller system AE Aqr. We confirm that a 7.34-hr period discovered in the Catalina survey data (Drake et al. 2014) is orbital. Another object, LAMOST J204305.95+341340.6 appears to be a near twin of the novalike variable V795 Her, with an orbital period in the so-called 2-3 hour "gap". LAMOST J035913.61+405035.0 is evidently an eclipsing, weakly-outbursting dwarf nova with a 5.48-hr period. Our spectrum of LAMOST J090150.09+375444.3 is dominated by a late-type secondary and shows weak, narrow Balmer emission moving in phase with the absorption lines, but at lower amplitude; we do not see the HeII 4686 emission evident in the published discovery spectrum. We again confirm that a period from the Catalina data, in this case 6.80 hr, is orbital. LAMOST J033940.98+414805.7 yields a radial-velocity period of 3.54 hr, and its spectrum appears to be typical of novalike variables in this period range. The spectroscopically-selected sample from LAMOST evidently includes some interesting cataclysmic variables that have been unrecognized until now, apparently because of the relatively modest range of their photometric variations.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Cataclysmic Variables Photometric Periods from TESS
TESS data give photometric periods for 1362 cataclysmic variables (hundreds new), confirming the 2–3 h gap, a sample median of 3.68 h, and spin periods for 83 intermediate polars.
-
Cataclysmic Variables Photometric Periods from TESS
TESS photometry yields coherent periods for 1,362 CVs, including roughly 465–565 first determinations, and confirms the 2–3 h period gap with a median period near 3.68 h.
-
Cataclysmic Variables Photometric Periods from TESS
TESS photometry of 1,362 cataclysmic variables yields 565 new period measurements, confirms the 2–3 h period gap, and finds a median CV photometric period of 3.681 h.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.