Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 48 references

Enhanced strain rate sensitivity due to platelet linear complexions in Al-Cu

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In Al-Cu, platelet linear complexions force dislocations to climb along the precipitate-matrix interface and climb back down before gliding, making strain rate sensitivity of strength 4-5.5 times higher than classical precipitate…

desk verdict Solid follow-up MD study shows platelet LCs raise strain rate sensitivity 4-5.5x via climb, but the two-potential workflow and missing error bars leave the quantitative claim under-supported. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.04396 v2 pith:7RWFBC2Z submitted 2025-06-04 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Pulkit Garg , Daniel S. Gianola , Timothy J. Rupert This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords dislocationsstrainratesensitivityprecipitationhardeningaluminumalloysmoleculardynamicslinearcomplexionsdislocationclimb
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that platelet-shaped 'linear complexions'—solute-rich precipitates that grow directly on dislocations in Al-Cu—force a moving dislocation to recombine into an edge-character segment, climb along the precipitate-matrix interface, and climb back down before glide can resume, a time-consuming process that classical precipitate interactions do not require. Because each climb step is slow and thermally activated, the stress needed to break the dislocation free rises steeply with applied strain rate, and the measured strain rate sensitivity parameter $m$ jumps from 0.02 for particle bowing or cutting to 0.08-0.11 for the complexion interaction. The result matters because Al-Cu alloys normally show near-zero strain rate sensitivity at room temperature; a microstructure whose strength is emphatically rate-dependent would harden the alloy under dynamic loading and, through the Hart criterion, could prolong uniform elongation at quasi-static rates. The authors frame the values as an effective rate dependence for a single dislocation-obstacle event in molecular dynamics, not a direct substitute for experimental measurements.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is dislocation climb along the precipitate-matrix interface. Instead of bypassing the obstacle on the glide plane, the partial pair recombines into a full dislocation with about 80% edge character, which climbs out of the slip plane along the interface (reaching maximum climb at $\gamma_F = 1.60\%$) and must climb back down before glide resumes; climb is diffusion-like and thermally activated, which is what makes the interaction rate-sensitive. The quantitative engine is the strain rate sensitivity parameter $m = \partial \ln \tau_{\mathrm{breakaway}} / \partial \ln \dot{\gamma}$, measured by deforming identical dislocation-platelet configurations at shear strain rates from $5\times10^6$ to $5\times10^8$ s$^{-1}$. The sample is built with a two-potential workflow: an EAM potential [27] that correctly forms Cu-rich platelets from dislocation segregation creates the complexion, and an angular-dependent potential [29] with accurate stacking fault energy carries the deformation simulations.

What would settle it

Re-equilibrate the two-potential sample under the deformation potential [29] with zero applied load and check whether the faceted platelet and its pinned edge-character segments persist; if the platelet dissolves or the dislocation unpins and glides away, the reported climb path is an artifact. A complementary check is to compute the climb barrier along the interface (via vacancy exchange or nudged elastic band) and confirm that it, rather than glide resistance, sets the measured $m$, or to repeat the deformation with a single potential that both nucleates the platelet and reproduces the stacking fault energy.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that platelet linear complexions change the elementary dislocation bypass mechanism: the leading and trailing Shockley partials recombine into a full dislocation whose interacting segments have mostly edge character (~80%), climb several atomic layers along the precipitate-matrix interface, and then must climb back down one layer at a time before the dislocation returns to its original slip plane and glides away. The platelet stands at 30° to the dislocation line, so the sequence differs between forward and reverse shear, but in both directions the climb steps make the critical shear stress strongly rate-dependent, with $m = \partial \ln \tau_{\mathrm{breakaway}} / \partial \ln \dot{\gamma}$ equal to 0.08 and 0.11 for the two loading directions, versus 0.02 for classical Orowan looping or precipitate cutting. The paper is careful to state that these molecular-dynamics values represent an effective rate dependence for a single obstacle interaction, meant to highlight the relative enhancement from linear complexions rather than to reproduce experimental $m$ values that emerge from an ensemble of obstacles.

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on the platelet complexion formed with the first interatomic potential surviving intact when the sample is handed to the second potential for deformation; if the platelet relaxes, dissolves, or changes how it pins the dislocation under the deformation potential, the climb mechanism and the fivefold rate-sensitivity enhancement would be artifacts of the potential handoff.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Al-Cu containing platelet linear complexions should be markedly stronger under dynamic loading than conventionally precipitation-hardened Al-Cu, because the climb-before-glide barrier grows with strain rate.
  • If the enhancement carries to bulk behavior, the Hart criterion predicts prolonged uniform tensile elongation at quasi-static strain rates, countering aluminum's usual tendency to neck early.
  • Strength models that treat precipitate obstacles as athermal bowing or cutting will underestimate the flow stress of complexion-hardened alloys at high strain rates, so rate dependence must enter the design rules.
  • Dislocation climb, normally a high-temperature creep mechanism, becomes a relevant plasticity channel at low temperature in these microstructures.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the two-potential handoff is sound, the same climb-with-multiplied-$m$ signature should appear in other FCC alloys predicted to host platelet array complexions, making it a generic complexion effect rather than an Al-Cu-specific accident.
  • A strain-rate jump test on aged Al-Cu whose hardening comes from GP-zone-like platelets could fingerprint the climb step experimentally: an elevated $m$ together with an activation volume much smaller than typical glide values.
  • Because the platelet is inclined 30° to the dislocation line, the enhancement should depend on slip system and loading direction, and polycrystalline averaging may dilute it; single-crystal or textured micro-pillars would give the cleanest test.
  • Running the same configurations at several temperatures (for example 250-400 K) would separate the thermally activated climb contribution from athermal parts of the stress and yield an activation energy that can be compared with vacancy-diffusion data.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses molecular dynamics simulations to compare the strain-rate sensitivity (SRS) of the critical shear stress for dislocation breakaway from platelet linear complexions in Al-Cu with classical precipitate strengthening by particle cutting and bowing. Platelet linear complexion configurations are created using a hybrid Monte Carlo/molecular dynamics procedure with the Cheng et al. embedded-atom potential, then transferred to the Apostol-Mishin angular-dependent potential for deformation simulations. A new edge dislocation is introduced on a (111) plane either through the platelet center (classical interaction) or just below it (LC-type interaction). Under shear at strain rates from 5e6 to 5e8 s^-1 at 250 K, the authors report that for LC-type interactions the leading and trailing Shockley partials recombine into a full dislocation, climb along the platelet-matrix interface, and must climb back down before glide can resume. From the slope of log critical shear stress versus log strain rate (Eq. 1), they obtain m = 0.02 for classical interactions and m = 0.08 and 0.11 for LC-type interactions, corresponding to a 4-5.5 times higher SRS for the platelet linear complexions. The paper concludes that platelet LCs introduce a time-dependent climb barrier that enhances SRS and could improve resistance to dynamic loading and promote uniform elongation.

Significance. If the mechanism holds, this is a significant advance: it identifies a specific atomistic origin for elevated strain-rate sensitivity in an Al alloy at low temperature, where climb is usually regarded as negligible, and it offers a falsifiable prediction that platelet linear complexions should raise SRS relative to classical precipitates by a factor of roughly 4-5.5. The relative comparison is internally consistent because the same MD protocol, interatomic potential, and strain rates are used for the LC-type and classical cases, and the m values are direct measurements from stress-strain curves rather than outputs of a fitted model. The DXA-based evidence for partial recombination and climb along the platelet interface is visually compelling. The paper does not ship code or raw data, and it reports no repeat simulations, so the quantitative claim rests on a small number of trajectories; nevertheless, the central mechanistic observation is well posed and experimentally testable.

major comments (3)
  1. [Models and methods (pp. 4-5, two-potential workflow)] The central mechanistic claim rests on the transferred platelet remaining metastable under the Apostol-Mishin potential, but the manuscript provides no evidence for this. The text itself states that the Apostol-Mishin potential 'was also tested in MC simulations; however, no platelet linear complexions were observed to form under the conditions studied, indicating its limitations in capturing such defect-stabilized structures.' After transferring the Cheng-et-al. platelet into the Apostol-Mishin cell, the authors equilibrate for only 100 ps NVE before adding the glide dislocation, and they report no structural metric (platelet thickness, Cu concentration profile across the platelet, interface structure, or CNA classification of the platelet) either after equilibration or during shear. If the platelet thins, dissolves, or changes interface character under the deformation potential, the edge-character climb along the platelet-matrix interface and the resulting m enhancement could be an artifact of imposing a structure that the deformation potential does not stabilize. Because both the classical and LC-type cells are built from the same transferred platelet, the relative comparison is not immune to this concern: the LC mechanism specifically requires a persistent, well-defined interface for climb. Please add a quantitative validation of platelet stability under the Apostol-Mishin potential at 250 K over at least the deformation time scale, for example time-resolved platelet thickness and Cu concentration profiles, or alternatively demonstrate the mechanism with a potential that both forms the LC and is used for deformation.
  2. [Fig. 5 and Eq. (1)] The SRS parameter m is obtained from a linear fit to only three strain rates (5e6, 5e7, and 5e8 s^-1), and no independent repeat simulations or error bars are reported. The claimed 4-5.5x ratio therefore has no quantified statistical uncertainty. At minimum, the authors should run two or three independent initial configurations per condition and report mean plus/minus standard error, or otherwise provide a bootstrap confidence interval for m. Without this, the central quantitative claim (m = 0.08 and 0.11 versus 0.02) is not established beyond single-trajectory noise.
  3. [Fig. 5(a,b), critical stress definition] The manuscript does not state an objective criterion for selecting the critical shear stress (tau_yield) from the stress-strain curves. This matters because the curves contain an earlier feature, described as the dislocation moving forward to become stuck at the obstacle, that is explicitly not the event of interest, and because m is defined by the slope of the selected points. Please specify a reproducible criterion, such as the first drop in shear stress after pinning, the stress at which DXA detects unpinning from the platelet, or the maximum stress before sustained plastic flow, and show how m changes under reasonable alternative criteria.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors: 'Pierels stresses' should be 'Peierls stresses', 'Nose–Hoover thermos/barostat' should be 'Nose–Hoover thermostat/barostat', and 'micro-canonical ensemble' should be 'microcanonical ensemble'.
  2. [Fig. 5 caption] The caption of Fig. 5 appears to mislabel subfigures (c) and (d): it says the critical shear stress is required during '(a) classical precipitate and (b) LC-type interactions', but the compiled plots are in subfigures (c) and (d). Please correct the caption/subfigure references.
  3. [Availability of data and materials] The data availability statement says the data are available within the article, but no input scripts or representative trajectories are provided. Given the nonstandard two-potential workflow, I encourage depositing the LAMMPS input files and representative configurations for reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the reported strain-rate sensitivity values are direct measurements from stress-strain curves, and no fitted parameter or self-citation chain forces the conclusion.

full rationale

The paper's central quantitative result is the slope m defined by Eq. (1) from simulated critical shear stresses at imposed strain rates (Fig. 5). The m values for the classical precipitate interactions (0.02) and LC-type interactions (0.08, 0.11) are obtained by direct measurement of the simulated breakaway stress, not by fitting a target result or by renaming an input. The LC configuration is taken from prior work (Refs. [8, 12]), but that is an input assumption about microstructure, not a reduction of the SRS claim. Self-citations are present but are not load-bearing in a circular sense: Ref. [12] motivates the system, and Ref. [8] supplies the formation protocol; neither is used to compute the strain-rate sensitivity or to forbid alternative mechanisms. The two-potential workflow (Cheng-EAM to create the platelet, Apostol-Mishin to deform it) is an unvalidated physical premise that could affect the validity of the climb mechanism, but it is not a circular derivation: the paper explicitly discloses that the deformation potential does not independently form platelet LCs. That is a correctness risk, not a logical reduction of the output to the input. No equation in the paper is defined in terms of the quantity it is said to predict, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new entities or hand-fitted physical constants are introduced. The central result rests on the transferability of an LC structure between two interatomic potentials and on the interpretation of the first breakaway event as yield.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The Apostol-Mishin interatomic potential accurately captures dislocation climb, stacking fault energy, and precipitate interactions in Al-Cu at 250 K.
    Used for all deformation simulations; if the potential misrepresents climb energetics, the SRS enhancement is an artifact. Section 'Models to simulate...'.
  • ad hoc to paper The platelet LC configuration created with the Cheng et al. potential remains metastable and representative when the system is switched to the Apostol-Mishin potential.
    The formation potential underestimates stacking fault energy, and the deformation potential does not produce LCs in MC/MD; transferability is untested. Same section.
  • domain assumption Critical shear stress for breakaway from the precipitate, identified as the first major event in each stress-strain curve, is the appropriate measure of strength for SRS.
    Multiple thermal activation attempts and obstacle arrays are ignored; the authors acknowledge the single-obstacle limitation. Section around Fig. 5.
  • domain assumption Simulation cell size and periodic boundary conditions are sufficient to avoid image interactions for a single dislocation-obstacle event.
    Cell is 34x25x10 nm, but no convergence test is reported. Section 'Models to simulate...'.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Enhanced strain rate sensitivity due to platelet linear complexions in Al-Cu." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7RWFBC2Z

@misc{pith2026250604396,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Enhanced strain rate sensitivity due to platelet linear complexions in Al-Cu},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7RWFBC2Z}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.04396}
}
read the original abstract

Platelet array linear complexions have been predicted in Al-Cu, with notable features being dislocation faceting and climb into the precipitate, both of which should impact plasticity. In this study, we examine the strain rate dependence of strength for platelet linear complexions using atomistic simulations, with classical precipitate strengthening through particle cutting and particle bowing used as baseline comparisons. Dislocation segments with edge character must climb down from the platelet structures prior to the commencement of glide, introducing a significant time-dependent barrier to plastic deformation. Consequently, the strain rate sensitivity of strength for the platelet linear complexions system was found to be up to five times higher than that of classical precipitation strengthening mechanisms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.04396 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. An equilibrated Al-Cu sample with a platelet precipitate and Shockley partial dislocation pair to simulate (a) classical precipitate and (b) LC-type interactions. Atoms are colored according to their local atomic structure (HCP, other, or Cu), while all of the Al atoms with FCC crystal structure have been removed for clarity. (c) An LC-type interaction with partial dislocations pinned at the precipitate during rever… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a, b) Classical precipitate and (c, d) LC-type interactions at a representative shear strain rate of 5×108 s-1 , with simulation viewing direction along the slip plane normal. The partial dislocations overcome the obstacle via (a) Orowan looping or (b) precipitate cutting during the classical precipitate interactions. All of the FCC atoms have been removed for clarity. The mechanism by which dislocations overcome t… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The dislocation climb process during LC-type interaction process at different shear strains for a forward shear strain rate of 5×108 s-1, with simulation viewing directions facing the platelet and from the top. All of the FCC atoms have been removed for clarity. The platelet precipitate atoms are colored according to their distance above the slip plane [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Kuzmina, M

    M. Kuzmina, M. Herbig, D. Ponge, S. Sandlöbes, D. Raabe, Linear complexions: Confined chemical and structural states at dislocations, Science 349(6252) (2015) 1080-1083

    2015

  2. [2]

    Kwiatkowski da Silva, D

    A. Kwiatkowski da Silva, D. Ponge, Z. Peng, G. Inden, Y. Lu, A. Breen, B. Gault, D. Raabe, Phase nucleation through confined spinodal fluctuations at crystal defects evidenced in Fe-Mn alloys, Nature Communications 9(1) (2018) 1137

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Kwiatkowski da Silva, G

    A. Kwiatkowski da Silva, G. Leyson, M. Kuzmina, D. Ponge, M. Herbig, S. Sandlöbes, B. Gault, J. Neugebauer, D. Raabe, Confined chemical and structural states at dislocations in Fe- 9wt%Mn steels: A correlative TEM-atom probe study combined with multiscale modelling, Acta Materialia 124 (2017) 305-315

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    Turlo, T.J

    V. Turlo, T.J. Rupert, Linear Complexions: Metastable Phase Formation and Coexistence at Dislocations, Physical Review Letters 122(12) (2019) 126102

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Turlo, T.J

    V. Turlo, T.J. Rupert, Interdependent Linear Complexion Structure and Dislocation Mechanics in Fe-Ni, Crystals 10(12) (2020) 1128

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Turlo, T.J

    V. Turlo, T.J. Rupert, Dislocation-assisted linear complexion formation driven by segregation, Scripta Materialia 154 (2018) 25-29

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Odette, N

    G.R. Odette, N. Almirall, P.B. Wells, T. Yamamoto, Precipitation in reactor pressure vessel steels under ion and neutron irradiation: On the role of segregated network dislocations, Acta Materialia 212 (2021) 116922

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Turlo, T.J

    V. Turlo, T.J. Rupert, Prediction of a wide variety of linear complexions in face centered cubic alloys, Acta Materialia 185 (2020) 129-141

    work page 2020

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    Howard, W.S

    H.C. Howard, W.S. Cunningham, A. Genc, B.E. Rhodes, B. Merle, T.J. Rupert, D.S. Gianola, Chemically ordered dislocation defect phases as a new strengthening pathway in Ni–Al alloys, Acta Materialia 289 (2025) 120887

    2025

  2. [10]

    Liu, S.K

    C. Liu, S.K. Malladi, Q. Xu, J. Chen, F.D. Tichelaar, X. Zhuge, H.W. Zandbergen, In-situ STEM imaging of growth and phase change of individual CuAlX precipitates in Al alloy, Scientific reports 7(1) (2017) 2184

    2017

  3. [11]

    Ringer, K

    S.P. Ringer, K. Hono, Microstructural Evolution and Age Hardening in Aluminium Alloys: Atom Probe Field-Ion Microscopy and Transmission Electron Microscopy Studies, Materials Characterization 44(1) (2000) 101-131

    2000

  4. [12]

    Garg, D.S

    P. Garg, D.S. Gianola, T.J. Rupert, Strengthening from dislocation restructuring and local climb at platelet linear complexions in Al-Cu alloys, Journal of Materials Science: Materials Theory 8(1) (2024) 9. 17

    2024

  5. [13]

    Mohebbi, A

    M.S. Mohebbi, A. Akbarzadeh, Development of equations for strain rate sensitivity of UFG aluminum as a function of strain rate, International Journal of Plasticity 90 (2017) 167-176

    2017

  6. [14]

    S.L. Yan, H. Yang, H.W. Li, X. Yao, Variation of strain rate sensitivity of an aluminum alloy in a wide strain rate range: Mechanism analysis and modeling, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 688 (2016) 776-786

    2016

  7. [15]

    A.S. Khan, H. Liu, Variable strain rate sensitivity in an aluminum alloy: Response and constitutive modeling, International Journal of Plasticity 36 (2012) 1-14

    2012

  8. [16]

    R.C. Picu, G. Vincze, F. Ozturk, J.J. Gracio, F. Barlat, A.M. Maniatty, Strain rate sensitivity of the commercial aluminum alloy AA5182-O, Materials Science and Engineering: A 390(1) (2005) 334-343

    2005

  9. [17]

    Huskins, B

    E. Huskins, B. Cao, K. Ramesh, Strengthening mechanisms in an Al–Mg alloy, Materials Science and Engineering: A 527(6) (2010) 1292-1298

    2010

  10. [18]

    Kabirian, A.S

    F. Kabirian, A.S. Khan, A. Pandey, Negative to positive strain rate sensitivity in 5xxx series aluminum alloys: Experiment and constitutive modeling, International Journal of Plasticity 55 (2014) 232-246

    2014

  11. [19]

    S. Yan, H. Yang, H. Li, G. Ren, Experimental study of macro–micro dynamic behaviors of 5A0X aluminum alloys in high velocity deformation, Materials Science and Engineering: A 598 (2014) 197-206

    2014

  12. [20]

    Hong Hue, V.-K

    D.T. Hong Hue, V.-K. Tran, V.-L. Nguyen, L. Van Lich, V.-H. Dinh, T.-G. Nguyen, High strain-rate effect on microstructure evolution and plasticity of aluminum 5052 alloy nano- multilayer: A molecular dynamics study, Vacuum 201 (2022) 111104

    2022

  13. [21]

    H. Fan, Q. Wang, J.A. El-Awady, D. Raabe, M. Zaiser, Strain rate dependency of dislocation plasticity, Nature Communications 12(1) (2021) 1845

    2021

  14. [22]

    Kim, Y.K

    W.J. Kim, Y.K. Sa, H.K. Kim, U.S. Yoon, Plastic forming of the equal-channel angular pressing processed 6061 aluminum alloy, Materials Science and Engineering: A 487(1) (2008) 360-368

    2008

  15. [23]

    Thompson, H.M

    A.P. Thompson, H.M. Aktulga, R. Berger, D.S. Bolintineanu, W.M. Brown, P.S. Crozier, P.J. in 't Veld, A. Kohlmeyer, S.G. Moore, T.D. Nguyen, R. Shan, M.J. Stevens, J. Tranchida, C. Trott, S.J. Plimpton, LAMMPS - a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling ...

    2022

  16. [24]

    Faken, H

    D. Faken, H. Jónsson, Systematic analysis of local atomic structure combined with 3D computer graphics, Computational Materials Science 2(2) (1994) 279-286

    1994

  17. [25]

    Stukowski, V.V

    A. Stukowski, V.V. Bulatov, A. Arsenlis, Automated identification and indexing of dislocations in crystal interfaces, Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering 20(8) (2012) 085007

    2012

  18. [26]

    A. Stukowski, Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO–the Open Visualization Tool, Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering 18(1) (2009) 015012

    2009

  19. [27]

    Cheng, E

    Y. Cheng, E. Ma, H. Sheng, Atomic level structure in multicomponent bulk metallic glass, Physical review letters 102(24) (2009) 245501

    2009

  20. [28]

    Y. Hu, T.J. Rupert, Atomistic modeling of interfacial segregation and structural transitions in ternary alloys, Journal of Materials Science 54(5) (2019) 3975-3993

    2019

  21. [29]

    Apostol, Y

    F. Apostol, Y. Mishin, Interatomic potential for the Al-Cu system, Physical Review B 83(5) (2011) 054116. 18

    2011

  22. [30]

    Tahreen, D.L

    N. Tahreen, D.L. Chen, M. Nouri, D.Y. Li, Effects of aluminum content and strain rate on strain hardening behavior of cast magnesium alloys during compression, Materials Science and Engineering: A 594 (2014) 235-245

    2014

  23. [31]

    W. Wang, G. Wang, Y. Hu, G. Guo, T. Zhou, Y. Rong, Temperature-dependent constitutive behavior with consideration of microstructure evolution for as-quenched Al-Cu-Mn alloy, Materials Science and Engineering: A 678 (2016) 85-92

    2016

  24. [32]

    Orowan, Symposium on internal stresses in metals and alloys, Institute of Metals, London 451 (1948)

    E. Orowan, Symposium on internal stresses in metals and alloys, Institute of Metals, London 451 (1948)

    1948

  25. [33]

    Ardell, Precipitation hardening, Metallurgical Transactions A 16(12) (1985) 2131- 2165

    A.J. Ardell, Precipitation hardening, Metallurgical Transactions A 16(12) (1985) 2131- 2165

    1985

  26. [34]

    Gerold, On the structures of Guinier-Preston zones in AlCu alloys introductory paper, Scripta Metallurgica 22(7) (1988) 927-932

    V. Gerold, On the structures of Guinier-Preston zones in AlCu alloys introductory paper, Scripta Metallurgica 22(7) (1988) 927-932

    1988

  27. [35]

    Singh, D.H

    C.V. Singh, D.H. Warner, Mechanisms of Guinier–Preston zone hardening in the athermal limit, Acta Materialia 58(17) (2010) 5797-5805

    2010

  28. [36]

    Adlakha, P

    I. Adlakha, P. Garg, K.N. Solanki, Revealing the atomistic nature of dislocation-precipitate interactions in Al-Cu alloys, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 797 (2019) 325-333

    2019

  29. [37]

    Xiang, D

    Y. Xiang, D. Srolovitz, Dislocation climb effects on particle bypass mechanisms, Philosophical magazine 86(25-26) (2006) 3937-3957

    2006

  30. [38]

    Singh, A.J

    C.V. Singh, A.J. Mateos, D.H. Warner, Atomistic simulations of dislocation–precipitate interactions emphasize importance of cross-slip, Scripta Materialia 64(5) (2011) 398-401

    2011

  31. [39]

    Vevecka-Priftaj, A

    A. Vevecka-Priftaj, A. Böhner, J. May, H.W. Höppel, M. Göken, Strain rate sensitivity of ultrafine grained aluminium alloy AA6061, Materials Science Forum, Trans Tech Publ, 2008, pp. 741-747

    2008

  32. [40]

    Saroukhani, L.D

    S. Saroukhani, L.D. Nguyen, K.W.K. Leung, C.V. Singh, D.H. Warner, Harnessing atomistic simulations to predict the rate at which dislocations overcome obstacles, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 90 (2016) 203-214

    2016

  33. [41]

    Gianola, D.H

    D.S. Gianola, D.H. Warner, J.F. Molinari, K.J. Hemker, Increased strain rate sensitivity due to stress-coupled grain growth in nanocrystalline Al, Scripta Materialia 55(7) (2006) 649-652

    2006

  34. [42]

    T. Zhu, J. Li, Ultra-strength materials, Progress in Materials Science 55(7) (2010) 710-757

    2010

  35. [43]

    T. Zhu, J. Li, A. Samanta, A. Leach, K. Gall, Temperature and strain-rate dependence of surface dislocation nucleation, Physical Review Letters 100(2) (2008) 025502

    2008

  36. [44]

    Zhang, R.C

    D. Zhang, R.C. Picu, Solute clustering in Al–Mg binary alloys, Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering 12(1) (2003) 121

    2003

  37. [45]

    S. Xu, L. Xiong, Y. Chen, D.L. McDowell, Edge dislocations bowing out from a row of collinear obstacles in Al, Scripta Materialia 123 (2016) 135-139

    2016

  38. [46]

    S. Xu, L. Xiong, Y. Chen, D.L. McDowell, An analysis of key characteristics of the Frank- Read source process in FCC metals, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 96 (2016) 460-476

    2016

  39. [47]

    Hart, Theory of the tensile test, Acta Metallurgica 15(2) (1967) 351-355

    E.W. Hart, Theory of the tensile test, Acta Metallurgica 15(2) (1967) 351-355

    1967

  40. [48]

    Y.M. Wang, E. Ma, Three strategies to achieve uniform tensile deformation in a nanostructured metal, Acta Materialia 52(6) (2004) 1699-1709

    2004

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.