Experimental Study of Tensor Structure Function of Deuteron

Alessandro Bacchetta; Jian-ping Chen; Jiwan Poudel; Nathaly Santiesteban

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 27 references

Experimental Study of Tensor Structure Function of Deuteron

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that the deuteron's transverse-momentum-dependent tensor structure functions, never measured before, can be extracted from semi-inclusive deep inelastic scattering at Jefferson Lab, first from existing CLAS12 data and…

desk verdict Honest program overview of JLab's deuteron tensor SIDIS plans, but the feasibility extraction has a finite-gamma issue that needs a quantitative answer before the central claim is solid. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.04506 v1 pith:DZUX2CT3 submitted 2025-06-04 nucl-ex hep-ex

Jiwan Poudel , Alessandro Bacchetta , Jian-Ping Chen , Nathaly Santiesteban This is my paper

classification nucl-exhep-ex PACS 13.60.-r13.88.+e25.30.-c

keywords deuterontensorpolarizationstructurefunctionstransverse-momentum-dependentdistributionssemi-inclusivedeepinelasticscatteringCLAS12JeffersonLabspin-1hadron

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to open a first experimental window on the tensor spin structure of the deuteron, the lightest spin-1 nucleus. Its central claim is that transverse-momentum-dependent (TMD) tensor structure functions, which have never been measured, can be extracted from semi-inclusive deep inelastic scattering at Jefferson Lab: first as an exploratory study using existing CLAS12 Run Group C data, then with dedicated experiments using a target with tensor polarization enhanced to about 30 percent. This matters because tensor structure cannot be built from the proton and neutron alone and can expose quark-gluon dynamics inside the nucleus. If the extraction works, it would provide the first data on tensor TMDs and help settle what the existing HERMES measurement of the inclusive function $b_1$ means.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the decomposition of the deuteron cross-section into unpolarized, vector-polarized, and tensor-polarized pieces, weighted by vector polarization $P$ and tensor polarization $Q$. The tensor asymmetry $A_T = \frac{1}{2 f_D Q}\left(\frac{N_T^{+P}}{N_U} + \frac{N_T^{-P}}{N_U} - 2\right)$ removes the unpolarized and vector contributions by combining yields from positive and negative target polarization, so the residual signal is proportional to the tensor structure functions. In SIDIS these functions are convolutions of tensor TMD distribution functions (e.g., $f_{1LL}$, $h_{1LL}^{\perp}$) with fragmentation functions, and their azimuthal modulations in $\phi_h$ allow separate extraction. For the existing CLAS12 data, $Q$ is inferred from the measured vector polarization using the thermal-equilibrium relation $Q = 2 - \sqrt{4-3P^2}$, with a neural-network analysis of NMR spectra planned to reduce that uncertainty.

What would settle it

A decisive check would be to compare the tensor polarization $Q$ extracted from the CLAS12 deuterated-ammonia target using the thermal-equilibrium relation with the value obtained from direct neural-network analysis of the NMR spectra; if the two disagree by more than the quoted uncertainty, the extracted $A_T$ and all derived tensor TMD structure functions inherit that bias. Similarly, if the RGC single-pion SIDIS tensor asymmetry comes out consistent with zero with uncertainties dominated by $Q$, the claimed feasibility of an exploratory extraction would not be supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the tensor contribution to the SIDIS cross-section on a longitudinally polarized deuteron target can be isolated through a target tensor asymmetry $A_T$, built from yields taken with positive and negative vector polarization, and then converted into tensor TMD structure functions such as $F_{U(LL),T}$, $F_{U(LL)}^{\cos\phi_h}$, and $F_{U(LL)}^{\cos 2\phi_h}$. These are the first experimentally accessible observables of their kind; the paper states explicitly that transverse-momentum-dependent tensor structure functions of the deuteron have never been experimentally studied before. The existing CLAS12 Run Group C data, despite only about 10 percent average tensor polarization, are argued to be sufficient for an exploratory extraction using pion-tagged events, and a dedicated Hall-C experiment with a roughly 30 percent tensor-polarized target is projected to give a precision measurement.

Load-bearing premise

The feasibility of the exploratory extraction rests on knowing the target's tensor polarization $Q$ accurately enough; the paper obtains it from the measured vector polarization via the thermal-equilibrium relation $Q = 2 - \sqrt{4-3P^2}$, a relation it admits may be inaccurate, with neural-network NMR analysis still underway.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The analysis would produce the first-ever extraction of deuteron tensor TMD structure functions from the CLAS12 Run Group C data, using both $d(e,e'\pi^+)X$ and $d(e,e'\pi^-)X$ channels.
A successful extraction would give model builders concrete targets for spin-1 TMD calculations, including the covariant model already applied to the $\rho^+$ meson.
It would motivate and calibrate the dedicated Hall-C tensor TMD experiment with an enhanced roughly 30 percent tensor-polarized target, replacing the current 10 percent scaling assumption with data-driven projections.
Together with the approved Hall-C $b_1$ experiment, the program would map both the collinear and transverse-momentum tensor structure of the deuteron and test conventional nuclear physics explanations of the HERMES result.
Future SoLID and 22 GeV Jefferson Lab running could extend these measurements to a multidimensional, high-precision study.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Editorial extension: If the RGC extraction succeeds at about 10 percent tensor polarization, the dedicated roughly 30 percent target would reduce the dominant polarization uncertainty by about a factor of three, making the projected precision in the paper likely conservative.
The paper does not discuss it, but the $\pi^+$ and $\pi^-$ channels could be combined to isolate valence-quark tensor distributions at large $x$, analogous to flavor tagging in unpolarized SIDIS.
A testable consequence: the extracted tensor TMD moments should show a sign pattern consistent with $b_1$ if the convolution formalism is correct; a sign flip at low transverse momentum would indicate new dynamics beyond the quoted framework.
Editorial inference: a null result in the exploratory CLAS12 analysis at 10 percent polarization would not disprove the tensor TMD formalism; it would only show that a dedicated higher-polarization target is required, which is the paper's stated fallback.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Read it. This is a JLab program overview, not a measurement paper, and the authors are mostly upfront about that. The new thing is the roadmap to first-ever SIDIS tensor TMD measurements on the deuteron: an exploratory CLAS12 RGC analysis using existing data, a dedicated Hall-C proposal with an enhanced tensor target, and later SoLID. As a program statement it is clear and honest. I credit the transparency: the Fig. 2 projection is explicitly called a constant 10% scaling of the unpolarized structure function, chosen from HERMES b1, not a theoretical prediction, and they admit the RGC target tensor polarization is not known precisely and NMR work is underway.

The soft spot that matters is finite-gamma contamination. Section 2.2 drops T∥⊥ and T⊥⊥ because they are said to be suppressed by γ = 2Mx/Q, which is small in DIS. Equation 15 then connects the measured A_T only to the T∥∥ structure functions. But for the paper's own RGC kinematics — Q² > 0.95 GeV², x up to 0.8 — γ is of order one over a large fraction of the phase space. At x = 0.3 with Q ≈ 1 GeV, γ ≈ 1.1; at x = 0.5, γ ≈ 1.9. The dropped terms are not numerically small there, so A_T in Eq. 15 does not cleanly isolate F_{U(LL),T} and the azimuthal modulations as claimed. This is an internal validity condition, not a model disagreement. The target-polarization calibration is a real downstream concern; the γ issue sits upstream. It deserves a quantitative check or a kinematic cut in the proposal.

Nothing else here bothers me much. The paper contains no new data and no new derivation, and it does not pretend otherwise. The formalism is drawn from the authors' own CAA and LOI, and the citation pattern is appropriate. The b1 discussion is conventional.

Who is this for? People tracking the JLab tensor program and spin-1 TMDs will find it useful as a program reference. It is not a paper that changes anyone's physics. Still, it is a serious experimental plan, and I would not desk-reject it. Send it to a referee who will make them quantify the γ suppression and the projection uncertainty. If those come back with a credible answer, this is a fine programmatic article.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript presents the formalism of tensor structure functions of the deuteron in inclusive and semi-inclusive deep inelastic scattering, and describes the experimental program at Jefferson Lab to measure them: an approved Hall-C inclusive b1 experiment, a CLAS12 Run Group C (RGC) exploratory analysis for tensor TMDs in SIDIS, a Hall-C letter of intent for a dedicated tensor TMD measurement, and future SoLID studies. The paper contains no new data; it is an overview and feasibility study. The central claim is that the first measurement of transverse-momentum-dependent tensor structure functions of the deuteron can be extracted from the proposed SIDIS measurements, using the CLAS12 RGC data as an exploratory step and dedicated targets later.

Significance. The measurement of tensor TMDs would open a genuinely new window into the partonic structure of spin-1 nuclei, and the paper is useful in assembling the formalism and the experimental landscape. Its strengths are the clear connection of the SIDIS observables to TMD factorization, the explicit disclosure of the limitations of the target-polarization determination, and the candid statement that the projected signal in Fig. 2 is based on a 10% scaling assumption. However, the feasibility claim rests on an extraction formula whose kinematic approximations are not valid in the proposed CLAS12 acceptance, and the projected signal is not a physics-based prediction. As a proposal/roadmap, the paper can be revised to address these issues.

major comments (4)

[Sec. 2.2 and Eq. (15)] The truncation of the transverse tensor-polarization components T∥⊥ and T⊥⊥ is not justified in the CLAS12 Run Group C kinematic range. The paper drops these terms citing suppression by γ = 2Mx/Q, which is stated to be small in DIS. For the quoted acceptance (Q^2 > 0.95 GeV^2, 0.08 < x < 0.8) with M ≈ 1.88 GeV, γ is approximately 0.3 at x = 0.08 and grows to about 1.2 at x = 0.3 and about 1.9 at x = 0.5 for Q ≈ 1 GeV. These estimates show that γ is of order one over much of the accepted phase space, so the neglected terms are comparable to the retained FU(LL),T terms. Consequently Eq. (15) does not isolate the claimed structure functions, and the extraction of the tensor TMDs via Eq. (5) is not cleanly defined. The authors should either retain the transverse components in the expression for AT (e.g., by using the full cross-section of Eq. (4) with the T∥⊥ and T⊥⊥ terms included) or restrict the kinematic region to where γ is demonstrably small, and justify that choice quantitatively.
[Sec. 3.2, Eqs. (8) and (15)] Equation (15) omits the conversion factor between the tensor polarization parameter Q and the target tensor component T∥∥ that enters the cross-section in Eq. (4). In Eq. (4) the tensor contribution is weighted by T∥∥, whereas the experimental asymmetry in Eq. (8) is normalized by Q. Since T∥∥ = [(1+3 cos(2θql))/(4√6)] Q, the right-hand side of Eq. (15) must be multiplied by this ratio. Even in the Bjorken limit (θql → 0) this factor is 1/√6 ≈ 0.41, and it varies with x and Q^2 through θql. As written, Eq. (15) gives the wrong absolute normalization for the extracted structure functions, and the kinematic dependence of the factor must be included if the azimuthal modulations are used to extract FU(LL),T, F^{cos φh}_{U(LL)}, and F^{cos 2φh}_{U(LL)}.
[Sec. 4.2, Fig. 2] The projected estimate of FU(LL),T is generated by applying a constant 10% scaling to the unpolarized structure function FU U,T, with the scale chosen from the HERMES inclusive b1 ratio. This is not a physics-based prediction for the tensor TMDs; it merely illustrates the statistical precision that would be obtained if the signal happened to be at that level. Since the paper's central claim is that a first tensor TMD measurement is feasible, the projection should be accompanied by a range of signal assumptions or by a model estimate (for instance, from the covariant calculation of Ref. [14]) to show that the extraction would survive if the actual signal is much smaller, as suggested by the existing b1 data. Without this, the feasibility argument is not independent of the assumed signal size.
[Sec. 4.1] The tensor polarization of the RGC target is obtained from the vector polarization using the thermal-equilibrium relation Q = 2 − sqrt(4 − 3P^2), which the paper itself notes may be inaccurate. Since AT in Eqs. (11) and (14) is divided by Q, any systematic error in Q propagates directly into all extracted tensor structure functions. The paper should provide a quantitative estimate of the uncertainty on Q from this method and of its impact on the extracted b1 and tensor TMDs for the exploratory CLAS12 analysis. The statement that neural-network analysis of NMR spectra is underway indicates an effort to address this, but it does not currently support the feasibility claim.

minor comments (4)

[Throughout] The manuscript contains several typographical errors, including 'Solenoinal' for 'Solenoidal' in the Introduction and 'asymetry' for 'asymmetry' in Section 3; a thorough proofreading is needed.
[References] Reference [15] is cited as 'Private communication (2025)' for a model calculation that is described as forthcoming; since the manuscript is intended as a formal publication, the authors should either provide a public preprint or remove the reference.
[Eq. (12)] The factor −1/3 in Eq. (12) is stated without derivation; although this follows from standard spin-1 formalism, a brief indication of the angular averaging would help the reader.
[Sec. 2.2] The notation for the structure-function subscripts is explained in the text, but the list after Eq. (4) is dense; a table defining the tensor TMD names and their physical meaning would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity found: projected signal is an explicitly labeled simulation input, and the formalism is independently grounded in TMD literature.

full rationale

The paper is an experimental proposal and feasibility document. Its central derivation chain is standard: the SIDIS cross-section (Eq. 4) and TMD decomposition (Eq. 5) are taken from the TMD factorization literature (Refs. [10,11,25]) and the authors' CAA/LOI companions (Refs. [19,20]); the tensor asymmetry (Eqs. 10, 14, 15) follows algebraically from the cross-section and the asymmetry definitions. The F_U(LL),T projection in Fig. 2 is constructed by a stated constant 10% scaling of the unpolarized structure function, chosen from the HERMES b1 ratio; this is a transparent simulation input for estimating statistical precision, not a fitted result relabeled as a prediction. The paper explicitly says better estimates will be made after the exploratory CAA measurement. The Q(P) thermal-equilibrium calibration and the neglect of transverse tensor components in Eq. 15 are acknowledged approximations; the finite-gamma issue is a kinematics/validity concern, not a circularity. Self-citations to the CAA proposal and LOI are normal companion references and are not load-bearing for an independent physics result; the underlying formalism is independently attributed. No step defines an output in terms of the very quantity it claims to extract.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The feasibility argument relies on the spin-1 TMD factorization, the small-gamma approximation, the thermal-equilibrium polarization model, and the leading-twist truncation. The 10% scaling factor is a hand-picked parameter; no new entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)

10% scaling factor R = 0.1
Chosen as a constant scaling of the unpolarized structure function FU U,T to project FU(LL),T; the factor is set by comparing HERMES b1 data to the unpolarized contribution (Sec. 4.2).

assumptions (4)

domain assumption TMD factorization and the convolution formulas for spin-1 targets (Eq. 5) are valid in the same form as spin-1/2.
Adopted from Refs [19,20], which are the authors' own CAA proposal and LOI; no independent derivation is given.
domain assumption The transverse components of the tensor polarization are suppressed by gamma = 2xM/Q and can be neglected in the SIDIS cross-section (Eq. 4).
Stated in Sec. 2.2; valid in the Bjorken limit, but JLab kinematics are at modest Q2 so the suppression is not always large.
domain assumption The relation Q = 2 - sqrt(4 - 3P^2) gives the tensor polarization from the measured vector polarization at thermal equilibrium.
Used in Sec. 4.1 for the CLAS12 RGC data; the paper notes that NMR analysis is needed to reduce uncertainty, implying the relation may be imperfect.
domain assumption Leading-twist Callan-Gross relation b2 = 2xb1 and neglect of higher twist terms are valid for extracting b1 from the inclusive asymmetry.
Stated in Sec. 3.1; the paper itself notes that higher twist effects may not be negligible at low Q2.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Experimental Study of Tensor Structure Function of Deuteron." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DZUX2CT3

@misc{pith2026250604506,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Experimental Study of Tensor Structure Function of Deuteron},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DZUX2CT3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.04506}
}

read the original abstract

The deuteron is the lightest spin-1 nucleus, consisting of a weakly bound system of two spin-1/2 nucleons. One intriguing characteristic of the deuteron is the tensor polarized structure, which cannot be naively constructed combining the proton and neutron structure. The tensor structure of the deuteron provides unique insights into the quarks and gluons distributions and their dynamics within the nucleus. It can be studied experimentally through inclusive and semi-inclusive Deep Inelastic Scattering (DIS) of electrons on tensor polarized deuterons. One-dimensional (longitudinal-momentum-dependent) tensor structure functions are extracted from the inclusive DIS, whereas three-dimensional with additional transverse-momentum-dependent tensor structure functions are extracted from the semi-inclusive DIS. Experimentally, achieving high tensor polarization for such measurements has been a challenge. Significant progress has recently been made in enhancing the tensor polarization for polarized deuteron target, opening up a new window for experimental studies of the deuteron tensor structure. In this article, we discuss the tensor structure functions of the deuteron and the experimental schemes to extract these functions at Jefferson Lab, highlighting the potential measurements of the transverse-momentum-dependent tensor structure functions.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages

[14]

Ninomiya, W

Y. Ninomiya, W. Bentz, I.C. Clo¨ et, Transverse-momentum-dependent quark distribution functions of spin-one targets: Formalism and covariant calculations. Phys. Rev. C 96, 045206 (2017). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.96.045206. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevC.96.045206

work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.96.045206 2017
[1]

Hoodbhoy, R.L

P. Hoodbhoy, R.L. Jaffe, A. Manohar, Novel Effects in Deep Inelastic Scattering from Spin 1 Hadrons. Nucl. Phys. B 312, 571–588 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0550-3213(89)90572-5

work page 1989
[2]

Nonvanishing tensor polarization of sea quarks in polarized deuterons

N.N. Nikolaev, W. Schafer, Nonva- nishing tensor polarization of sea quarks in polarized deuterons. Phys. Lett. B 398, 245–251 (1997). https: //doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(97)00250-5. [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 407, 453 (1997)]. arXiv:hep-ph/9611460

work page Pith review arXiv 1997
[3]

The Double Scattering Contribution to $b_1(x,Q^2)$ in the Deuteron

K. Bora, R.L. Jaffe, The Double scatter- ing contribution to b(1) (x, Q**2) in the deuteron. Phys. Rev. D 57, 6906–6911 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 57.6906. arXiv:hep-ph/9711323

work page Pith review arXiv 1998
[4]

Relativistic Calculation of Structure Functions b_{1,2}(X) of the Deuteron

A.Y. Umnikov, Relativistic calculation of structure functions b(1,2)(x) of the deuteron. Phys. Lett. B 391, 177–184 (1997). https: //doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(96)01440-2. arXiv:hep-ph/9605291

work page Pith review arXiv 1997
[5]

Edelmann, G

J. Edelmann, G. Piller, W. Weise, Polar- ized deuteron structure functions at small x. Z. Phys. A 357, 129–131 (1997). https:// doi.org/10.1007/s002180050226. arXiv:nucl- th/9701026

work page arXiv 1997
[7]

Kumano, Q.T

S. Kumano, Q.T. Song, TMDs for Spin-1 Hadrons, in Proceedings of the 24th Interna- tional Spin Symposium (SPIN2021)(Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 2022). https: //doi.org/10.7566/jpscp.37.020130. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.7566/JPSCP.37.020130

work page doi:10.7566/jpscp.37.020130 2022
[8]

Miller, Pionic and hidden-color, six- quark contributions to the deuteron b1 struc- ture function

G.A. Miller, Pionic and hidden-color, six- quark contributions to the deuteron b1 struc- ture function. Physical Review C 89(4) (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc. 89.045203. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.89.045203

doi:10.1103/physrevc 2014

Show all 27 references

[9]

Airapetian, et al., Measurement of the tensor structure function b1 of the deuteron

A. Airapetian, et al., Measurement of the tensor structure function b1 of the deuteron. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 242001 (2005). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.242001. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.95.242001

2005 doi
[10]

Bacchetta, P.J

A. Bacchetta, P.J. Mulders, Deep inelas- tic leptoproduction of spin-one hadrons. Phys. Rev. D 62, 114004 (2000). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.62.114004. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevD.62.114004

2000 doi
[11]

Kumano, Q.T

S. Kumano, Q.T. Song, Transverse- momentum-dependent parton distribution functions up to twist 4 for spin-1 hadrons. Phys. Rev. D 103, 014025 (2021). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.014025. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevD.103.014025

2021 doi
[12]

Cosyn, C

W. Cosyn, C. Weiss, Polarized electron- deuteron deep-inelastic scattering with spec- tator nucleon tagging. Phys. Rev. C 102, 065204 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.102.065204. arXiv:2006.03033 [hep-ph]

2020 arXiv
[13]

Cosyn, Y.B

W. Cosyn, Y.B. Dong, S. Kumano, M. Sargsian, Tensor-polarized structure 10 function b1 in standard convolution descrip- tion of deuteron. Phys. Rev. D 95(7), 074036 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 95.074036. arXiv:1702.05337

2017 arXiv
[15]

I.C. Clo¨ et. Private communication (2025)

2025
[16]

Keller, D

D. Keller, D. Crabb, D. Day, Enhanced Tensor Polarization in Solid-State Tar- gets. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 981, 164504 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2020. 164504. arXiv:2008.09515

2020 arXiv
[17]

Clement, D

J. Clement, D. Keller, Manipulation of spin- 1 solid-state targets. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 1050, 168177 (2023). https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.nima.2023.168177

2023
[18]

Slifer, et al

K. Slifer, et al. The deuteron ten- sor structure function b 1 (JLab Hall-C Proposal). https://www.jlab.org/exp prog/ proposals/13/PR12-13-011.pdf
[19]

Poudel, et al

J. Poudel, et al. Spin 1 transverse momen- tum dependent tensor structure functions in clas12 (CAA proposal) (2025). URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2502.20044

2025 arXiv
[20]

Ruth, et al

D. Ruth, et al. Letter of Intent to PAC52. https://misportal.jlab.org/pacProposals/ proposals/1986/attachments/196135/ LOI Tensor TMDs.pdf

1986
[21]

Arrington, et al

J. Arrington, et al. The Solenoidal Large Intensity Device (SoLID) for JLab 12 GeV (The White Paper) (2023). URL https:// arxiv.org/abs/2209.13357

2023 arXiv
[22]

Burkert, et al., The clas12 spectrometer at jefferson laboratory

V. Burkert, et al., The clas12 spectrometer at jefferson laboratory. Nuclear Instru- ments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 959, 163419 (2020). https://doi.org/https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2020.163419...

2020
[23]

Close, S

F.E. Close, S. Kumano, Sum rule for the spin- dependent structure function b1(x) for spin- one hadrons. Phys. Rev. D 42, 2377–2379 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 42.2377. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevD.42.2377

1990 doi
[24]

Diehl, S

M. Diehl, S. Sapeta, On the analysis of lepton scattering on longitudinally or trans- versely polarized protons. The European Physical Journal C 41(4), 515–533 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s2005-02242-9. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/ s2005-02242-9

2005 doi
[25]

Bacchetta, M

A. Bacchetta, M. Diehl, K. Goeke, A. Metz, P.J. Mulders, M. Schlegel, Semi-inclusive deep inelastic scattering at small transverse momentum. Journal of High Energy Physics 2007(02), 093 (2007). https://doi.org/10. 1088/1126-6708/2007/02/093. URL https:// dx.doi.org/10.1088/112...

2007 doi
[26]

Arenhovel, W

H. Arenhovel, W. Leidemann, E.L. Tomu- siak, The Role of the Neutron Electric Form- factor in D(e, e′N ) N Including Polarization Observables. Z. Phys. A 331, 123–138 (1988)

1988
[27]

Leidemann, E.L

W. Leidemann, E.L. Tomusiak, H. Arenh¨ ovel, Inclusive deuteron electrodisintegration with polarized electrons and a polarized tar- get. Phys. Rev. C 43, 1022–1037 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.43.1022. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevC.43.1022

1991 doi
[28]

Slifer, et al

K. Slifer, et al. The deuteron tensor struc- ture function b 1 (JLab Hall-C Jeopardy Proposal). https://misportal.jlab.org/ pacProposals/proposals/1880/attachments/ 174121/2023 b1 Jeopardy.pdf 11

2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [14]

Ninomiya, W

Y. Ninomiya, W. Bentz, I.C. Clo¨ et, Transverse-momentum-dependent quark distribution functions of spin-one targets: Formalism and covariant calculations. Phys. Rev. C 96, 045206 (2017). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.96.045206. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevC.96.045206

work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.96.045206 2017

[2] [1]

Hoodbhoy, R.L

P. Hoodbhoy, R.L. Jaffe, A. Manohar, Novel Effects in Deep Inelastic Scattering from Spin 1 Hadrons. Nucl. Phys. B 312, 571–588 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0550-3213(89)90572-5

work page 1989

[3] [2]

Nonvanishing tensor polarization of sea quarks in polarized deuterons

N.N. Nikolaev, W. Schafer, Nonva- nishing tensor polarization of sea quarks in polarized deuterons. Phys. Lett. B 398, 245–251 (1997). https: //doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(97)00250-5. [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 407, 453 (1997)]. arXiv:hep-ph/9611460

work page Pith review arXiv 1997

[4] [3]

The Double Scattering Contribution to $b_1(x,Q^2)$ in the Deuteron

K. Bora, R.L. Jaffe, The Double scatter- ing contribution to b(1) (x, Q**2) in the deuteron. Phys. Rev. D 57, 6906–6911 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 57.6906. arXiv:hep-ph/9711323

work page Pith review arXiv 1998

[5] [4]

Relativistic Calculation of Structure Functions b_{1,2}(X) of the Deuteron

A.Y. Umnikov, Relativistic calculation of structure functions b(1,2)(x) of the deuteron. Phys. Lett. B 391, 177–184 (1997). https: //doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(96)01440-2. arXiv:hep-ph/9605291

work page Pith review arXiv 1997

[6] [5]

Edelmann, G

J. Edelmann, G. Piller, W. Weise, Polar- ized deuteron structure functions at small x. Z. Phys. A 357, 129–131 (1997). https:// doi.org/10.1007/s002180050226. arXiv:nucl- th/9701026

work page arXiv 1997

[7] [7]

Kumano, Q.T

S. Kumano, Q.T. Song, TMDs for Spin-1 Hadrons, in Proceedings of the 24th Interna- tional Spin Symposium (SPIN2021)(Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 2022). https: //doi.org/10.7566/jpscp.37.020130. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.7566/JPSCP.37.020130

work page doi:10.7566/jpscp.37.020130 2022

[8] [8]

Miller, Pionic and hidden-color, six- quark contributions to the deuteron b1 struc- ture function

G.A. Miller, Pionic and hidden-color, six- quark contributions to the deuteron b1 struc- ture function. Physical Review C 89(4) (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc. 89.045203. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.89.045203

doi:10.1103/physrevc 2014