Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 85 references

Adiabatic dynamics in a V-type quantum system by oppositely chirped counterrotating circularly polarized laser pulses

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Potassium atoms driven by intense oppositely chirped counterrotating circularly polarized pulses follow the field adiabatically, and this V-RAP mechanism explains the measured reshaping of the photoelectron vortices.

desk verdict Serious analytical core, honest about its own gaps, but the experimental confirmation lacks the adiabaticity check — deserves review with revisions. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.05177 v2 pith:GDTOS73X submitted 2025-06-05 physics.atom-ph quant-ph

D. Köhnke , T. Bayer , M. Wollenhaupt This is my paper
classification physics.atom-phquant-ph
keywords adiabaticfollowingV-typethree-levelsystemoppositelychirpedcounterrotatingcircularlypolarizedpulsesshapedfreeelectronvortices(1+2)REMPIrapidpassagecoherentpopulationreturn
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports a non-perturbative excitation mechanism, V-RAP, in a resonant V-type three-level system driven by an oppositely chirped counterrotating circularly polarized (OC-CRCP) femtosecond pulse, and argues that it explains the measured change in potassium's three-dimensional photoelectron momentum distribution. In the perturbative regime the same pulse creates a superposition of $c_2$, $c_4$, and $c_6$ shaped free-electron vortices (SEVs); at higher intensity the atom is predicted to follow the field adiabatically, with the two $4p$ $m=\pm1$ excited states driven in anti-phase. Because of that anti-phase relation, two two-photon ionization pathways into the $|\varepsilon_f,\pm1\rangle$ continua interfere destructively at all times, suppressing the $c_2$ and $c_4$ vortices relative to the $c_6$ vortex. The paper tests this by comparing measured and simulated PMDs in both regimes and finds the predicted relative enhancement of the $c_6$ vortex, treating it as the signature that V-RAP is realized; the agreement in the non-perturbative regime is reasonable rather than exact, which the authors attribute to the asymmetric white-light spectrum and to omitted $3d/4d$ resonances.

What carries the argument

The central object is the V-type three-level linkage, ground $|4s,m=0\rangle$ together with the degenerate excited states $|4p,\pm1\rangle$, coupled by an OC-CRCP pulse, i.e. a field that stays linearly polarized while its polarization angle rotates with a time-dependent angular velocity because the LCP component is up-chirped and the RCP component is down-chirped. In the rotating frame the dynamics is controlled by the instantaneous detuning $\Delta(t)=\dot{\zeta}(t)$ and the Rabi envelope $\Omega_0(t)$; adiabatic following holds when the dimensionless parameter $\alpha(t) = |\dot{\Omega}_0\Delta - \Omega_0\dot{\Delta}|/(2\Omega_0^2+\Delta^2)^{3/2}$ stays much smaller than one. The adiabatic solution (Eq. B18) has the structural identity $c_{+1}(t)=-c_{-1}^{*}(t)$, and that identity is what turns the two competing two-photon ionization amplitudes into exact opposites, yielding the adiabatic cancellation of Eqs. (16)\text{--}(17) that carries the explanation.

What would settle it

A decisive test would be an intensity series: measure the $c_2$, $c_4$, and $c_6$ SEV yields as the peak Rabi frequency is swept from the perturbative to the adiabatic regime. V-RAP predicts the relative $c_6$ yield should rise monotonically and saturate as $\alpha(t)$ falls below about 0.1; if instead the yield ratio passes through a maximum, oscillates, or rises with no saturation, or if a multistate simulation that includes the 3d and 4d resonances reproduces the measured enhancement while the V-RAP cancellation identity fails, the adiabatic-cancellation explanation is contradicted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in the non-perturbative $(1+2)$ REMPI of potassium with OC-CRCP pulses the resonant $4s\text{--}4p$ V-system evolves adiabatically, so the excited-state amplitudes obey $c_{+1}(t) = -c_{-1}^{*}(t)$ (Eq. B18). Inserting that solution into second-order perturbation theory makes the pathway amplitudes $I_{+1}^{(-1,+1)}(t)$ and $I_{-1}^{(+1,+1)}(t)$ exactly opposite (Eqs. 16\text{--}17), so the associated ionization pathways cancel throughout the pulse. The $|\varepsilon_f,\pm1\rangle$ continua therefore lose most of their weight, suppressing the $c_2$ and $c_4$ vortices in the measured 3D PMD while the $c_6$ vortex, fed through the non-interfering $|\varepsilon_f,\pm3\rangle$ channels, becomes relatively stronger. The authors conclude that the pronounced changes observed in the PMD confirm the V-RAP scenario in the potassium $4s\text{--}4p$ system.

Load-bearing premise

The whole explanation rests on the assumption that the experimental laser pulses are strong and smooth enough that the atom stays in a single slowly changing light-coupled state for the entire pulse, and that the higher-lying 3d and 4d states the model leaves out do not redirect the ionization; if either condition fails, the predicted exact cancellation of two ionization pathways breaks down and the measured change in the vortex pattern would need another explanation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At sufficiently high intensity and chirp, the two excited-state amplitudes lock in anti-phase, so the partial-wave continua $|\varepsilon_f,\pm1\rangle$ are suppressed and the $c_2$ and $c_4$ SEV yields drop relative to $c_6$.
  • The $c_6$ SEV yield becomes a direct readout of the V-RAP mechanism: its relative enhancement in a decomposed PMD is the observable signature that adiabatic following occurred in the bound system.
  • Because V-RAP is an adiabatic mechanism, increasing the peak Rabi frequency or chirp further strengthens the adiabatic following and cancellation (the paper's Fig. 5), so the effect should saturate rather than oscillate with intensity.
  • The atom undergoes coherent population return and ends up back in the ground state, so the ionization signal is produced transiently during the pulse even though the excited states are strongly driven.
  • Flipping the sign of the chirp reverses the rotational sense of the SEVs, and the paper shows this chirp control persists into the non-perturbative regime.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • We infer that V-RAP should transfer to other alkali atoms with a similar $s$\text{--}$p$ V-type linkage; because the mechanism depends on the linkage geometry and on satisfying the adiabatic condition rather than on potassium-specific details, rubidium or cesium under appropriately chirped OC-CRCP pulses should show the same relative enhancement of the $c_6$ vortex.
  • A testable extension: the anti-phase relation $c_{+1} = -c_{-1}^{*}$ is a general consequence of the symmetric-spectrum Hamiltonian in any interaction regime, so the paper's distinctive claim is that adiabaticity makes it persist with the specific phase locking needed for exact cancellation; a shaper-based pump-probe measurement of the excited-state amplitudes would isolate that phase locking from
  • If the cancellation is as clean as modeled, the same scheme could be used to produce nearly pure $c_6$ electron vortices, turning the suppression of $c_2$ and $c_4$ channels from an observed side effect into a resource for coherent control or photoelectron holography.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper identifies and explains a new adiabatic mechanism in the (1+2) resonant multiphoton ionization of potassium by oppositely chirped counterrotating circularly polarized (OC-CRCP) pulses. In the non-perturbative regime, the degenerate 4s-4p V-system is claimed to follow the OC-CRCP field adiabatically ('V-RAP'), giving excited-state amplitudes c_{+1}(t) = -c*_{-1}(t) (Eqs. 10 and B18). Inserting this solution into the second-order ionization amplitudes (Eq. C5) yields an exact destructive interference between the pathways I_{+1}^{(-1,+1)} and I_{-1}^{(+1,+1)} (Eqs. 16-17), suppressing the |εf,±1⟩ continua and therefore the c2 and c4 symmetric free electron vortices, and relatively enhancing the c6 component in the measured 3D photoelectron momentum distribution. The authors support the mechanism with illustrative simulations (Fig. 2), with measured 3D PMDs at perturbative (I1 ≈ 5×10^11 W/cm^2) and non-perturbative (I2 ≈ 8 I1) intensities, and with decomposition of the PMDs into SEV yields via Eq. (20).

Significance. If the V-RAP scenario is confirmed, the paper offers a new and clean connection between adiabatic strong-field control and the angular composition of free electron vortices, and it gives an experimentally accessible signature (relative c6 enhancement) of an adiabatic mechanism in a V-type system. Among the paper's strengths are the parameter-free analytical derivation of the adiabatic solution and of the cancellation in Eq. (17), the explicit dimensionless adiabaticity parameter α(t) (Eq. 9) that makes the central condition quantitatively falsifiable, the numerical support from short-time-propagation TDSE simulations, and the high-quality experimental methodology (supercontinuum polarization shaping, VMI-based tomography, and 3D Fourier decomposition). The main reservations concern the documentation of adiabaticity for the experimental conditions and the quantification of the experimental comparison; they do not affect the internal consistency of the central algebraic result.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. IV and Sec. II.D, Eqs. (8)-(9)] The central claim that the measured PMD changes confirm V-RAP requires α(t) << 1 for the actual experimental conditions, but the manuscript never reports α(t) for the Fig. 4(c) parameters. The only quantitative demonstration of adiabaticity is Fig. 2, which uses a Gaussian input pulse with Δt = 5 fs, φ2 = 80 fs^2, and a peak Rabi frequency scaled to 50 Ω̂0 = 0.5 rad/fs. The non-perturbative experiment in Fig. 4(c) uses an asymmetric white-light spectrum, Δt ≈ 6 fs, |φ2| = 40 fs^2, and I2 ≈ 8 I1 ≈ 4×10^12 W/cm^2, but neither the corresponding peak Rabi frequency nor the α(t) of the simulation shown in Fig. 4(c) is stated. Since Eqs. (16)-(17) are obtained by inserting the adiabatic solution (B18) into Eq. (C5), the cancellation, and hence the attribution of the observed c6 enhancement to V-RAP, is not quantitatively established for the experimental conditions. The authors should report the peak Rabi frequency (and its calibration to the reported intensity), the chirp-stretched envelope (Eq. A5), and the resulting maximum of α(t) over the pulse for the non-perturbative data, including the effect of the asymmetric spectrum on the Hamiltonian (6) that underlies the derivation.
  2. [Eqs. (13), (C1), (C5), (15)-(17)] There is a sign inconsistency in the printed derivation of the adiabatic cancellation. With the field definition in Eq. (4), E_{-q}(t) = E_mod(t) e^{+iq ζ(t)}, so the product E_{-q1}(t) E_{-q2}(t) in Eqs. (13) and (C1) carries phase e^{+i(q1+q2)ζ}. Multiplied by c_{q0} ~ e^{-iq0ζ} from Eq. (B18), this yields the phase e^{-i(q0 - q1 - q2)ζ}, which agrees with Eq. (C5)'s e^{-i(q0+q1+q2)ζ} only when q1 + q2 = 0. For the crucial partner I_{-1}^{(+1,+1)} (q1 + q2 = +2) the literal reading gives e^{+3iζ}, so the exact cancellation in Eq. (17) would not follow; Eq. (15) likewise requires the two fields to be E_{+1} E_{+1}, not E_{-1} E_{-1}. The derivation becomes fully consistent if the subscripts in Eqs. (13) and (C1) read E_{q1}(t) E_{q2}(t); the authors should correct this (or explicitly redefine the field labeling) because Eq. (17) is the central mechanism of the paper.
  3. [Fig. 4(d) and Sec. IV] The quantitative experimental support lacks error bars and an error budget. The yield bars in Fig. 4(d) are shown without uncertainties, and the 'reasonable agreement' with the simulation in the non-perturbative case is not quantified. This matters because the authors themselves state (Sec. IV) that the asymmetric WLS spectrum makes the two pulse components not exact complex conjugates, so the excited-state anti-phase relation and hence the adiabatic cancellation are incomplete, and that the near-resonant 3d/4d states add extra phases along the 2PI pathways. These admissions modify precisely the quantitative content of Eq. (17) that the experiment is claimed to confirm. To make the comparison meaningful, the paper should (i) provide uncertainties for the Cj yields (from shot noise and tomographic reconstruction), and (ii) quantify the residual cancellation, e.g., by simulating with the measured asymmetric spectrum and reporting the ratio |I_{+1}^{(-1,+1)} + I_{-1}^{(+1,+1)}| relative to the remaining pathway amplitude, and by estimating the size of the 3d/4d corrections.
  4. [Fig. 4(b)-(c), Sec. IV] The perturbative and non-perturbative measurements differ in two experimental parameters simultaneously: the intensity is increased from I1 to 8 I1 while the chirp sign is flipped from φ2 = +40 fs^2 to -40 fs^2. The paper states the sign flip was made deliberately to demonstrate control of the rotational sense of the SEVs, but as a result the measured changes in the PMD shape cannot, by themselves, be assigned uniquely to the intensity-driven V-RAP mechanism; a chirp-sign-dependent change of the relative SEV yields in the non-perturbative regime would produce a similar-looking difference. The c6-enhancement claim would be cleanly supported by a non-perturbative measurement at φ2 = +40 fs^2 (or a perturbative measurement at -40 fs^2), or at minimum by an explicit argument, with data or simulation, that the relative yields C2, C4, C6 are invariant under the sign flip at fixed intensity.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. II.D] The text refers to 'the second row of Fig. 3' when describing the intermediate-field dynamics; this should be Fig. 2.
  2. [Sec. II.C] The sentence 'This phenomenon, which occurs only when the V-RAP mechanism is realized in the bound state system.' is a sentence fragment and should be joined to the following sentence.
  3. [Sec. IV] The sentence 'The suppression of the ring lobes ... is, therefore, are direct accessible in the experiment.' contains a grammatical error ('are direct accessible' should be 'is directly accessible').
  4. [Eqs. (14)-(18)] The symbol E^2(t) in Eqs. (14)-(18) is used for the squared envelope E_mod^2(t); since E(t) denotes the cartesian field in Eq. (5), the notation should be defined explicitly to avoid confusion.
  5. [Sec. IV] The 'non-perturbative regime' label refers to the bound-state dynamics, while the ionization step is still treated by second-order perturbation theory (Eq. (12)); the authors should state explicitly that at I2 the total ionization probability remains small so that Eq. (12) is applicable, and should comment on the absence of focal-volume averaging in the simulated PMDs compared with the measured ones.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the V-RAP cancellation follows algebraically from the stated Hamiltonian and is then compared with independent experimental and numerical data.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained and non-circular. Starting from the RWA Hamiltonian (Eq. B1), it derives the adiabatic condition (Eqs. B13-B15), solves the dressed-state TDSE to obtain the adiabatic bare-state solution with c_{+1}(t) = -c*_{-1}(t) (Eqs. B16-B18), and inserts this solution into the perturbative two-photon-ionization amplitude formula (Eqs. C1-C5) to obtain the exact cancellation I_{+1}^{(-1,+1)}(t) = -I_{-1}^{(+1,+1)}(t) (Eq. 17). The cancellation is a mathematical consequence of the assumed adiabatic following, not a fit to the measured PMD. The c6 enhancement is then compared with experimentally measured PMDs and with independent numerical TDSE simulations; no parameter is fitted to the c6/c4/c2 yield ratios. The citations to [60] and [61] supply the OC-CRCP pulse concept, the experimental apparatus, and the 3D Fourier retrieval method, but the V-RAP mechanism and adiabatic cancellation are derived from the stated Hamiltonian rather than imported from those references. The paper's own caveats (asymmetric WLS spectrum, omitted 3d/4d resonances, incomplete cancellation) limit the quantitative agreement but do not indicate that the prediction reduces to its inputs. The unverified experimental adiabaticity, i.e., whether alpha(t) << 1 holds for the conditions of Fig. 4, is a validation gap rather than a circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted constants are used in the analytical derivation; the cancellation Eq. (17) follows algebraically from the adiabatic solution. However, the paper relies on several idealizations: resonance and RWA, a symmetric input spectrum, the adiabatic following condition, a three-state truncation, and perturbative ionization. The authors explicitly concede that two of these, spectrum symmetry and three-state truncation, are violated in the experiment. The regime parameters in Fig. 2 are chosen by hand to display adiabaticity.

free parameters (2)
  • Peak Rabi frequency scale for regime illustrations = 10 mrad/fs, then 10x and 50x in Fig. 2
    The adiabatic regime is demonstrated by scaling the base Rabi frequency up by a factor of 50; the paper does not derive this value from the experimental intensity, so the adiabaticity condition for the actual experiment is an input choice rather than a measured result.
  • ROI for SEV yield integration (Eq. 20) = epsilon0 = 0.5 eV, delta_epsilon = 0.3 eV, theta0 = 90 deg, delta_theta = 40 deg
    The scalar yields that quantify the c6 enhancement are obtained by integrating Cj over a hand-selected region of interest; sensitivity of the conclusion to this ROI choice is not reported.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Rotating wave approximation and exact resonance delta = 0
    Used to write the TDSE as Eq. (6)/(B1); standard for near-resonant excitation, but few-femtosecond broadband pulses may couple other states and off-resonant terms.
  • domain assumption Symmetric input spectrum E_in(-omega) = E_in(omega)
    Assumed after Eq. (4) so the two OC-CRCP components are exact complex conjugates; Sec. IV states the measured WLS spectrum is asymmetric, so the anti-phase synchronization and perfect cancellation are only approximate.
  • domain assumption Adiabatic following condition alpha(t) << 1
    Eq. (8)/(B14) is required for the dressed-state solution Eq. (B18) and hence for the exact cancellation in Eqs. (16)-(17); whether the experimental pulse parameters satisfy this condition is not directly characterized.
  • domain assumption Truncation to the three-state 4s/4p(m=+/-1) manifold
    The essential-state model omits the 3d and 4d states, which the authors note are resonantly accessible with the broadband WLS and which affect the adiabatic cancellation mechanism.
  • domain assumption Second-order perturbation theory for the ionization step
    Eq. (12) treats ionization as a weak probe that does not back-act on the bound-state dynamics; valid for moderate intensities but not justified quantitatively here.
  • domain assumption Atom initially in the ground state c(-infinity) = (1,0,0)
    Standard initial condition for the TDSE; the atomic beam is assumed to start in the 4s, m=0 state.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Adiabatic dynamics in a V-type quantum system by oppositely chirped counterrotating circularly polarized laser pulses." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GDTOS73X

@misc{pith2026250605177,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Adiabatic dynamics in a V-type quantum system by oppositely chirped counterrotating circularly polarized laser pulses},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GDTOS73X}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.05177}
}
abstract

Shaped free electron vortices (SEVs) have recently been studied using atomic (1+2) resonance-enhanced multiphoton ionization (REMPI) by oppositely chirped counterrotating circularly polarized (OC-CRCP) femtosecond laser pulses. By transitioning from the perturbative to the non-perturbative REMPI regime, we identify an adiabatic excitation mechanism in a resonant V-type three-level system, termed V-RAP due to its similarities to rapid adiabatic passage (RAP). Experimentally, we observe a pronounced change in the shape of the measured three-dimensional photoelectron momentum distribution (3D PMD), which we trace back to this mechanism via analytical calculations and numerical simulations of the bound state and ionization dynamics. In V-RAP, the atom adiabatically follows the OC-CRCP field, with the two excited states driven in anti-phase, leading to an adiabatic cancellation of specific ionization pathways and explaining the observed changes in the PMD. In the experiment, we combine supercontinuum polarization pulse shaping to generate OC-CRCP femtosecond laser pulses with velocity map imaging-based photoelectron tomography to reconstruct the 3D PMD. The reconstructed PMDs are decomposed by 3D Fourier analysis into SEVs of different rotational symmetry, revealing a significant enhancement of the $c_6$-symmetric contribution, which is the signature of the V-RAP.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.05177 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Physical system. (a) Illustration of a Gaussian [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Simulated bound-state and ionization dynamics, induced by a Gaussian-shaped OC-CRCP pulse with an transform [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Illustration of the data analysis to extract the yield of the individual SEVs, which are superimposed in the created [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Experimental results. (a) Measured power spectral density (PSD) of the white light supercontinuum used in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Simulated bound-state and ionization dynamics analogously to Fig. 2, obtained for a peak Rabi frequency of 100 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages

  1. [60]

    Bayer and M

    T. Bayer and M. Wollenhaupt, Molecular free electron vortices in photoionization by polarization-tailored ul- trashort laser pulses, Frontiers in Chemistry10, 899461 (2022)

    work page 2022

  2. [61]

    K¨ ohnke, T

    D. K¨ ohnke, T. Bayer, and M. Wollenhaupt, Shaped free- electron vortices, Phys. Rev. A110, 053109 (2024)

    2024

  3. [1]

    Brumer and M

    P. Brumer and M. Shapiro, Laser control of chemical re- actions, Scientific American3, 34 (1995)

    1995

  4. [2]

    S. A. Rice and M. Zhao,Optical Control of Molecular Dynamics(Wiley, New York, 2000) p. 456

    2000

  5. [3]

    Tannor,Introduction to Quantum Mechanics: A Time-Dependent Perspective(University Science Books, Sausalito, 2007) p

    D. Tannor,Introduction to Quantum Mechanics: A Time-Dependent Perspective(University Science Books, Sausalito, 2007) p. 662

    2007

  6. [4]

    A. M. Weiner, Femtosecond pulse shaping using spatial light modulators, Rev. Sci. Instrum.71, 1929 (2000)

    work page 2000

  7. [5]

    Rabitz, R

    H. Rabitz, R. de Vivie-Riedle, M. Motzkus, and K. Kompa, Whither the future of controlling quantum phenomena?, Science288, 824 (2000)

    work page 2000

  8. [6]

    Brixner and G

    T. Brixner and G. Gerber, Femtosecond polarization pulse shaping, Opt. Lett.26, 557 (2001)

    work page 2001

Show all 85 references
  1. [7]

    Wohlleben, T

    W. Wohlleben, T. Buckup, J. L. Herek, and M. Motzkus, Coherent control for spectroscopy and manipulation of biological dynamics, Chem. Phys. Chem.6, 850 (2005)

    2005

  2. [8]

    Silberberg, Quantum coherent control for nonlinear spectroscopy and microscopy, Annu

    Y. Silberberg, Quantum coherent control for nonlinear spectroscopy and microscopy, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 60, 277 (2009)

    2009

  3. [9]

    Monmayrant, S

    A. Monmayrant, S. Weber, and B. Chatel, A newcomer’s guide to ultrashort pulse shaping and characterization, J. Phys. B43, 103001 (2010)

    2010

  4. [10]

    Wollenhaupt, A

    M. Wollenhaupt, A. Assion, and T. Baumert,in: Springer Handbook of Lasers and Optics, Vol. 2 (Springer, 2012)

    2012

  5. [11]

    Misawa, Applications of polarization-shaped fem- tosecond laser pulses, Adv

    K. Misawa, Applications of polarization-shaped fem- tosecond laser pulses, Adv. Phys. X1, 544 (2016)

    2016

  6. [12]

    Dantus,Femtosecond Laser Shaping: From Labora- tory to Industry(CRC Press, 2017)

    M. Dantus,Femtosecond Laser Shaping: From Labora- tory to Industry(CRC Press, 2017)

    2017

  7. [13]

    H. Qi, Z. Lian, D. Fei, Z. Chen, and Z. Hu, Manipulation of matter with shaped-pulse light field and its applica- tions, Advances in Physics: X6, 1949390 (2021)

    2021

  8. [14]

    Strickland and G

    D. Strickland and G. Mourou, Compression of amplified chirped optical pulses, Opt. Comm.56, 219 (1985)

    1985

  9. [15]

    Strickland, Nobel lecture: Generating high-intensity ultrashort optical pulses, Rev

    D. Strickland, Nobel lecture: Generating high-intensity ultrashort optical pulses, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 030502 (2019)

    2019

  10. [16]

    Baumert, T

    T. Baumert, T. Brixner, V. Seyfried, M. Strehle, and G. Gerber, Femtosecond pulse shaping by an evolution- ary algorithm with feedback, Appl. Phys. B65, 779 (1997)

    1997

  11. [17]

    Yelin, D

    D. Yelin, D. Meshulach, and Y. Silberberg, Adaptive fem- tosecond pulse compression, Opt. Lett.22, 1793 (1997). 14

    1997

  12. [18]

    Wollenhaupt, V

    M. Wollenhaupt, V. Engel, and T. Baumert, Femtosec- ond laser photoelectron spectroscopy on atoms and small molecules: Prototype studies in quantum control, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.56, 25 (2005)

    2005

  13. [19]

    Nuernberger, G

    P. Nuernberger, G. Vogt, T. Brixner, and G. Gerber, Femtosecond quantum control of molecular dynamics in the condensed phase, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.9, 2470 (2007)

    2007

  14. [20]

    Zamith, J

    S. Zamith, J. Degert, S. Stock, B. de Beauvoir, V. Blanchet, M. A. Bouchene, and B. Girard, Observa- tion of coherent transients in ultrashort chirped excita- tion of an undamped two-level system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 033001 (2001)

    2001

  15. [21]

    Degert, W

    J. Degert, W. Wohlleben, B. Chatel, M. Motzkus, and B. Girard, Realization of a time-domain fresnel lens with coherent control, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 203003 (2002)

    2002

  16. [22]

    Monmayrant, B

    A. Monmayrant, B. Chatel, and B. Girard, Quantum state measurement using coherent transients, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 103002 (2006)

    2006

  17. [23]

    Bayer, M

    T. Bayer, M. Wollenhaupt, and T. Baumert, Strong-field control landscapes of coherent electronic excitation, J. Phys. B41, 074007 (2008)

    2008

  18. [24]

    Suchowski, A

    H. Suchowski, A. Natan, B. D. Bruner, and Y. Silber- berg, Spatio-temporal coherent control of atomic sys- tems: weak to strong field transition and breaking of symmetry in 2d maps, J. Phys. B41, 074008 (2008)

    2008

  19. [25]

    Bergmann, H

    K. Bergmann, H. Theuer, and B. W. Shore, Coherent population transfer among quantum states of atoms and molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys.70, 1003 (1998)

    1998

  20. [26]

    N. V. Vitanov, T. Halfmann, B. W. Shore, and K. Bergmann, Laser-induced population transfer by adi- abatic passage techniques, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.52, 763 (2001)

    2001

  21. [27]

    B. W. Shore,Manipulating Quantum Structures Using Laser Pulses(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,

  22. [28]

    Chatel, J

    B. Chatel, J. Degert, and B. Girard, Role of quadratic and cubic spectral phases in ladder climbing with ultra- short pulses, Phys. Rev. A70, 053414 (2004)

    2004

  23. [29]

    Broers, H

    B. Broers, H. B. V. Vandenheuvell, and L. D. Noordam, Efficient population transfer in a 3-level ladder system by frequency-swept ultrashort laser-pulses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2062 (1992)

    1992

  24. [30]

    Chatel, J

    B. Chatel, J. Degert, S. Stock, and B. Girard, Competi- tion between sequential and direct paths in a two-photon transition, Phys. Rev. A68, 041402 (2003)

    2003

  25. [31]

    D. J. Maas, D. I. Duncan, R. B. Vrijen, W. J. van der Zande, and L. D. Noordam, Vibrational ladder climbing in no by (sub)picosecond frequency-chirped infrared laser pulses, Chem. Phys. Lett.290, 75 (1998)

    1998

  26. [32]

    J. S. Melinger, S. R. Gandhi, A. Hariharan, J. X. Tull, and W. S. Warren, Generation of narrow-band inversion with broad-band laser-pulses, Phys. Rev. Lett.68, 2000 (1992)

    1992

  27. [33]

    M. Krug, T. Bayer, M. Wollenhaupt, C. Sarpe-Tudoran, T. Baumert, S. S. Ivanov, and N. V. Vitanov, Coherent strong-field control of multiple states by a single chirped femtosecond laser pulse, New J. Phys.11, 105051 (2009)

    2009

  28. [34]

    J. S. Melinger, A. Hariharan, S. R. Gandhi, and W. S. Warren, Adiabatic population inversion in i2 vapor with picosecond laser pulses, J. Chem. Phys.95, 2210 (1991)

    1991

  29. [35]

    C. J. Bardeen, Q. Wang, and C. V. Shank, Selective ex- citation of vibrational wave packet motion using chirped pulses, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 3410 (1995)

    1995

  30. [36]

    Assion, T

    A. Assion, T. Baumert, J. Helbing, V. Seyfried, and G. Gerber, Coherent control by a single phase shaped femtosecond laser pulse, Chem. Phys. Lett.259, 488 (1996)

    1996

  31. [37]

    S. H. Autler and C. H. Townes, Stark effect in rapidly varying fields, Phys. Rev.100, 703 (1955)

    1955

  32. [38]

    Wollenhaupt, A

    M. Wollenhaupt, A. Pr¨ akelt, C. Sarpe-Tudoran, D. Liese, and T. Baumert, Quantum control by selective popula- tion of dressed states using intense chirped femtosecond laser pulses, Appl. Phys. B82, 183 (2006)

    2006

  33. [39]

    Calegari, G

    F. Calegari, G. Sansone, S. Stagira, C. Vozzi, and M. Nisoli, Advances in attosecond science, J. Phys. B 49, 062001 (2016)

    2016

  34. [40]

    Chang, P

    Z. Chang, P. B. Corkum, and S. R. Leone, Attosec- ond optics and technology: progress to date and future prospects [invited], JOSA B33, 1081 (2016)

    2016

  35. [41]

    Ilchen, E

    M. Ilchen, E. Allaria, P. Rebernik Ribiˇ c, H.-D. Nuhn, A. Lutman, E. Schneidmiller, M. Tischer, M. Yurkov, M. Calvi, E. Prat, S. Reiche, T. Schmidt, G. A. Geloni, S. Karabekyan, J. Yan, S. Serkez, Z. Gao, B. Deng, C. Feng, H. Deng, W. Helml, L. Funke, M. Larsson, V. Zhaunerch...

    2025

  36. [42]

    Richter, U

    F. Richter, U. Saalmann, E. Allaria, M. Wollen- haupt, B. Ardini, A. Brynes, C. Callegari, G. Cerullo, M. Danailov, A. Demidovich, K. Dulitz, R. Feifel, M. D. Fraia, S. D. Ganeshamandiram, L. Giannessi, N. G¨ olz, S. Hartweg, B. von Issendorff, T. Laar- mann, F. Landmesser, Y....

    2024

  37. [43]

    Brixner, G

    T. Brixner, G. Krampert, T. Pfeifer, R. Selle, G. Ger- ber, M. Wollenhaupt, O. Graefe, C. Horn, D. Liese, and T. Baumert, Quantum control by ultrafast polarization shaping, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 208301 (2004)

    2004

  38. [44]

    J. M. Ngoko Djiokap, S. X. Hu, L. B. Madsen, N. L. Manakov, A. V. Meremianin, and A. F. Starace, Elec- tron vortices in photoionization by circularly polarized attosecond pulses, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 113004 (2015)

    2015

  39. [45]

    Pengel, S

    D. Pengel, S. Kerbstadt, D. Johannmeyer, L. Englert, T. Bayer, and M. Wollenhaupt, Electron vortices in fem- tosecond multiphoton ionization, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 053003 (2017)

    2017

  40. [46]

    Pengel, S

    D. Pengel, S. Kerbstadt, L. Englert, T. Bayer, and M. Wollenhaupt, Control of three-dimensional electron vortices from femtosecond multiphoton ionization, Phys. Rev. A96, 043426 (2017)

    2017

  41. [47]

    J. M. Ngoko Djiokap, A. V. Meremianin, N. L. Manakov, S. X. Hu, L. B. Madsen, and A. F. Starace, Multistart spiral electron vortices in ionization by circularly polar- ized UV pulses, Phys. Rev. A94, 013408 (2016). 15

    2016

  42. [48]

    M. Li, G. Zhang, T. Zhao, X. Ding, and J. Yao, Elec- tron vortices in photoionization by a pair of elliptically polarized attosecond pulses, Chin. Opt. Lett.15, 120202 (2017)

    2017

  43. [49]

    X. Kong, G. Zhang, M. Li, T. Wang, X. Ding, and J. Yao, Odd-fold-symmetric spiral momentum distributions and their Stark distortions in hydrogen, JOSA B35, 2163 (2018)

    2018

  44. [50]

    J. Jia, H. Cui, C. Zhang, J. Shao, J. Ma, and X. Miao, Investigation of the photoionization process of helium ion in bichromatic circularly xuv fields with different time delays, Chem. Phys. Lett.725, 119 (2019)

    2019

  45. [51]

    Zhen, H.-D

    Q. Zhen, H.-D. Zhang, S.-Q. Zhang, L. Ji, T. Han, and X.-S. Liu, Generation of electron vortices in photoioniza- tion by counter-rotating circularly polarized attosecond pulses, Chem. Phys. Lett.738, 136885 (2020)

    2020

  46. [52]

    G. S. J. Armstrong, D. D. A. Clarke, J. Benda, J. Wragg, A. C. Brown, and H. W. van der Hart, Modeling to- mographic measurements of photoelectron vortices in counter-rotating circularly polarized laser pulses, Phys. Rev. A100, 063416 (2019)

    2019

  47. [53]

    Eickhoff, L

    K. Eickhoff, L. Englert, T. Bayer, and M. Wollenhaupt, Multichromatic polarization-controlled pulse sequences for coherent control of multiphoton ionization, Front. Phys.9, 444 (2021)

    2021

  48. [54]

    In addition, we will carry out numerical quantum dynam- ics simulations employing our ab initio 2D TDSE model

    to generate an additional ultrashort probe pulse of a different color to perform shaper-based polarization- sensitive pump-probe experiments for the time-resolved background-free imaging of the V-RAP dynamics. In addition, we will carry out numerical quantum dynam- ics simulat...

  49. [55]

    K. J. Yuan, H. Z. Lu, and A. D. Bandrauk, Photoioniza- tion of triatomic molecular ions H 2+ 3 by intense bichro- matic circularly polarized attosecond UV laser pulses, J. Phys. B50, 124004 (2017)

    2017

  50. [56]

    K¨ ohnke, K

    D. K¨ ohnke, K. Eickhoff, T. Bayer, and M. Wollenhaupt, Multichromatic supercontinuum polarization shaping ap- plied to photoelectron holography, New J. Phys.25, 123025 (2023)

    2023

  51. [57]

    J. Guo, S. Q. Zhang, J. Zhang, S. P. Zhou, and P. F. Guan, Exploration of electron vortices in the photoion- ization of diatomic molecules in intense laser fields, Laser Physics31, 065301 (2021)

    2021

  52. [58]

    J. M. N. Djiokap, A. V. Meremianin, N. L. Manakov, L. B. Madsen, S. X. Hu, and A. F. Starace, Dynamical electron vortices in attosecond double photoionization of H2, Phys. Rev. A98, 063407 (2018)

    2018

  53. [59]

    Wang, M.-Y

    R.-R. Wang, M.-Y. Ma, L.-C. Wen, Z. Guan, Z.-Q. Yang, Z.-H. Jiao, G.-L. Wang, and S.-F. Zhao, Comparative study of electron vortices in photoionization of molecules and atoms by counter-rotating circularly polarized laser pulses, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B40, 1749 (2023)

    2023

  54. [62]

    N. J. Strandquist and J. M. Ngoko Djiokap, Reversible electron spirals by chirped attopulses at zero time delay, Phys. Rev. A106, 043110 (2022)

    2022

  55. [63]

    Korobenko, Control of molecular rotation with an optical centrifuge, J

    A. Korobenko, Control of molecular rotation with an optical centrifuge, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.51, 203001 (2018)

    2018

  56. [64]

    Karczmarek, J

    J. Karczmarek, J. Wright, P. Corkum, and M. Ivanov, Optical centrifuge for molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 3420 (1999)

    1999

  57. [65]

    Bayer, M

    T. Bayer, M. Wollenhaupt, H. Braun, and T. Baumert, Ultrafast and efficient control of coherent electron dy- namics via SPODS, Adv. Chem. Phys.159, 235 (2016)

    2016

  58. [66]

    Wollenhaupt, A

    M. Wollenhaupt, A. Pr¨ akelt, C. Sarpe-Tudoran, D. Liese, and T. Baumert, Strong field quantum control by se- lective population of dressed states, J. Opt. B7, S270 (2005)

    2005

  59. [67]

    Vala and R

    J. Vala and R. Kosloff, Coherent mechanism of robust population inversion, Opt. Express8, 238 (2001)

    2001

  60. [68]

    Huang, B

    W. Huang, B. W. Shore, A. Rangelov, and E. Kyoseva, Adiabatic following for a three-state quantum system, Opt. Comm.382, 196 (2017)

    2017

  61. [69]

    Fano, Propensity rules – an analytical approach, Phys

    U. Fano, Propensity rules – an analytical approach, Phys. Rev. A32, 617 (1985)

    1985

  62. [70]

    N. V. Vitanov and P. L. Knight, Coherent excitation by asymmetric pulses, J. Phys. B28, 1905 (1995)

    1995

  63. [71]

    Wollenhaupt, A

    M. Wollenhaupt, A. Assion, O. Bazhan, C. Horn, D. Liese, C. Sarpe-Tudoran, M. Winter, and T. Baumert, Control of interferences in an Autler-Townes doublet: Symmetry of control parameters, Phys. Rev. A68, 015401 (2003)

    2003

  64. [72]

    Meshulach and Y

    D. Meshulach and Y. Silberberg, Coherent quantum con- trol of two-photon transitions by a femtosecond laser pulse, Nature396, 239 (1998)

    1998

  65. [73]

    A. M. Weiner, Ultrafast optical pulse shaping: A tutorial review, Opt. Comm.284, 3669 (2011)

    2011

  66. [74]

    Eickhoff, L

    K. Eickhoff, L. Feld, D. K¨ ohnke, T. Bayer, and M. Wollenhaupt, Trichromatic shaper-based quantum state holography, Phys. Rev. A104, 052805 (2021)

    2021

  67. [75]

    A. T. J. B. Eppink and D. H. Parker, Velocity map imag- ing of ions and electrons using electrostatic lenses: Appli- cation in photoelectron and photofragment ion imaging of molecular oxygen, Rev. Sci. Instrum.68, 3477 (1997)

    1997

  68. [76]

    Kerbstadt, L

    S. Kerbstadt, L. Englert, T. Bayer, and M. Wollenhaupt, Ultrashort polarization-tailored bichromatic fields, J. Mod. Opt.64, 1010 (2017)

    2017

  69. [77]

    Smeenk, L

    C. Smeenk, L. Arissian, A. Staude, D. M. Villeneuve, and P. B. Corkum, Momentum space tomographic imaging of photoelectrons, J. Phys. B42, 185402 (2009)

    2009

  70. [78]

    Wollenhaupt, M

    M. Wollenhaupt, M. Krug, J. K¨ ohler, T. Bayer, C. Sarpe- Tudoran, and T. Baumert, Three-dimensional tomo- graphic reconstruction of ultrashort free electron wave packets, Appl. Phys. B95, 647 (2009)

    2009

  71. [79]

    M. D. Feit, J. A. Fleck Jr, and A. Steiger, Solution of the Schr¨ odinger equation by a spectral method, J. Comp. Phys.47, 412 (1982)

    1982

  72. [80]

    A. C. Kak and M. Slaney,Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging(IEEE Press, New York, 1988) pp. 1–339

    1988

  73. [81]

    Wollenhaupt, M

    M. Wollenhaupt, M. Krug, J. K¨ ohler, T. Bayer, C. Sarpe- Tudoran, and T. Baumert, Photoelectron angular distri- butions from strong-field coherent electronic excitation, Appl. Phys. B95, 245 (2009)

    2009

  74. [82]

    Karule, Multiphoton ionization of atomic hydrogen us- ing perturbation theory, inAdvances in atomic, molecu- lar, and optical physics, Vol

    E. Karule, Multiphoton ionization of atomic hydrogen us- ing perturbation theory, inAdvances in atomic, molecu- lar, and optical physics, Vol. 27 (Elsevier, 1990) pp. 265– 299

    1990

  75. [83]

    Dynamics on the Nanoscale

    to shed light on the interaction between the induced vectorial dipole dynamics in the bound system and the shaped vectorial light field at the level of the wave func- tion. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the collaborative research program “Dyn...

  76. [84]

    Kerbstadt, D

    S. Kerbstadt, D. Pengel, D. Johannmeyer, L. Englert, T. Bayer, and M. Wollenhaupt, Control of photoelectron momentum distributions by bichromatic polarization- shaped laser fields, New J. Phys.19, 103017 (2017)

    2017

  77. [85]

    Bayer, K

    T. Bayer, K. Eickhoff, D. K¨ ohnke, and M. Wollenhaupt, Phase control of the autler-townes doublet in multistate systems, Phys. Rev. A108, 033111 (2023)

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.