Planar Abelian Duals of Chern-Simons QCD

Anant Shri; Gabriel Pedde Ungureanu; Riccardo Comi; Sara Pasquetti; Sergio Benvenuti; Simone Rota

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 58 references

Planar Abelian Duals of Chern-Simons QCD

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Planar Abelian quivers are proposed as exact IR duals of SU(N) Chern-Simons QCD

desk verdict A serious non-Abelian-to-Abelian duality conjecture with strong consistency checks and one openly flagged load-bearing assumption: the IR enhancement of the quiver's topological symmetries, deferred to an unpublished companion. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.05465 v1 pith:HS6IMA4C submitted 2025-06-05 hep-th

Sergio Benvenuti , Riccardo Comi , Sara Pasquetti , Gabriel Pedde Ungureanu , Simone Rota , Anant Shri This is my paper

classification hep-th

keywords Chern-Simonsmattertheories3dbosonizationinfrareddualitiesmirrorsymmetryplanarquiversmonopoleoperatorsAbelianizationQCDin2+1dimensions

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes that every 2+1-dimensional $SU(N)$ or $U(N)$ Chern-Simons QCD theory with enough fundamental scalars and fermions has an infrared description as a purely Abelian gauge theory: a planar quiver of $U(1)$ nodes with bosons and fermions on its edges. If the proposal is correct, the strongly coupled non-Abelian dynamics is exactly captured by an Abelian quiver whose interactions are written directly on the diagram. The duality exchanges flavor symmetries for topological symmetries, maps mesons, baryons, and conserved currents to dressed monopole operators, and interchanges bosonic and fermionic matter in a column-by-column bosonization rule. The authors support the proposal with a detailed operator dictionary, mass-deformation flows that reproduce the same family of dualities, and consistency with known Abelian and topological dualities.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the planar quiver: a diagram whose round nodes are $U(1)$ gauge groups, square nodes are flavor groups, arrows are bifundamental bosons (blue) or fermions (red), and each face encodes an interaction term; dotted edges are pure BF couplings. The Lagrangian is completed by monopole potentials that reduce the column topological symmetries to diagonal combinations and by Gross-Neveu-Yukawa terms with real scalars. Monopole operators are then quantized in the presence of these fluxes; fermionic zero modes shift the effective gauge charges and transmute spin, so dressing the bare monopole with zero modes produces the gauge-invariant operators that realize the entire meson/baryon/current dictionary.

What would settle it

Compute the infrared scaling dimension of the dressed spin-1 monopole operators identified as the would-be conserved currents of the enhanced flavor symmetry: if any dimension differs from exactly 2, the enhancement and the duality fail. A sharper check is to verify the predicted TQFT duality between $SU(N)_{-1}$ and the Abelian theory with the $K$ matrix of (6.4) by matching the full set of anyon data.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is a duality: $SU(N)_{2N-N_s-N_f/2-k}$ QCD in three dimensions with $N_s$ critical scalars and $N_f$ fermions, in the range $N_s+N_f \ge 2N$, $N_s \ge 2N$, $k \ge 0$, is infrared-equivalent to a planar quiver of $U(1)$ gauge groups with mixed Chern-Simons/BF couplings, monopole potentials, and Gross-Neveu-Yukawa terms. Under this duality the topological symmetry $U(1)^{N_s+N_f}$ enhances to the non-Abelian flavor group $U(N_s) \times U(N_f)$, and flavor charges become topological charges. The operator dictionary is explicit: off-diagonal mesons, all baryons, and the conserved flavor currents of the QCD side map to suitably dressed monopole operators in the quiver, with the required spin fixed by statistical transmutation. The same construction extends to $U(N)$ by gauging the baryonic symmetry, and the $N=1$ case reduces to known Abelian bosonization dualities.

Load-bearing premise

The duality rests on the unproven claim that the topological $U(1)^{N_s+N_f}$ symmetry of the Abelian quiver enhances in the infrared to the non-Abelian flavor group $U(N_s) \times U(N_f)$; the rank matching and every monopole-to-operator map depend on it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Every off-diagonal meson, conserved current, and baryon of the non-Abelian theory is represented explicitly as a dressed monopole in the Abelian quiver, so correlators of these operators become in principle computable on the Abelian side.
Adding one scalar flavor on the QCD side inserts one fermionic column in the quiver, and adding one fermionic flavor inserts one bosonic column, giving a systematic column-wise bosonization rule for non-Abelian theories.
Mass deformations flow to new dual pairs in the same family, and fully massive deformations produce TQFT dualities, including $SU(N)_{-1}$ dual to the Abelian Chern-Simons theory with the $K$ matrix of equation (6.4).
Gauging the baryonic symmetry extends the duality to $U(N)$ Chern-Simons QCD, and special limits reproduce known particle-vortex and $O(2)$ Wilson-Fisher dualities.
The construction extends below $N_s=2N$ in examples, where the planar dual can become completely bosonic.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the claimed non-Abelian enhancement is real, the Abelian quiver should reproduce not just the spectrum but the full set of correlation functions of the QCD theory; large-$N$ or bootstrap computations on the quiver side could test this directly.
The monopole-mixing degeneracy noted in Section 3.2 implies the operator dictionary is defined only up to a unitary mixing matrix; diagonalizing that matrix would turn the dictionary into predictive spectral data.
The planar structure suggests an algorithmic dualization procedure analogous to brane-tiling constructions; if such an algorithm exists, it could generate Abelian duals for non-Abelian Chern-Simons-matter theories far beyond the flavor-rich regime treated here.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Two things to know up front. First, this is a genuine proposal with genuine checks: the authors compute gauge charges of dressed monopoles explicitly, give a complete-looking operator dictionary (mesons and conserved currents from the same monopole in spin-0/spin-1 channels, baryons as multi-flux monopoles), and show that mass deformations land back inside the same family of dualities. Second, the load-bearing premise is asserted rather than derived: the quiver's U(1)^Ns topological symmetries are claimed to enhance in the IR to SU(Ns) x U(1) (Eqs. 3.6, 4.3), and the SUSY descent that might justify this is deferred to an unpublished companion paper. The authors flag both points themselves, so nothing here is hidden.

What is actually new: the non-Abelian-to-planar-Abelian duality family, and the flavor-to-column bosonization rule—adding a fermion flavor on the QCD side inserts a bosonic column in the quiver, and vice versa. The N=1 limit reduces to Karch-Robinson-Tong, which is the right external anchor, and the SU(2)0 mass-flow check reproduces a known duality of Benini. The most solid piece is Section 6.3: the TQFT duality there is actually proven, via level/rank duality plus an explicit integer matrix pair satisfying the Delmastro-Gomis condition. That is a real, reproducible result and it gives confidence that the machinery is tracking something true.

The soft spots, in proportion. The symmetry enhancement is the whole show; if it fails, the duality fails even though rank matching and the charge tables look consistent. The paper never computes the conformal dimensions of the would-be conserved current monopoles, so the enhancement is plausible but unsupported by dynamical evidence. Relatedly, the dual is engineered: V_monopole is placed by hand to break exactly the right diagonal combination of topological symmetries, and its relevance is asserted, not shown. In the SUSY ancestor the superpotential would be protected; here there is no such protection. Second, the derivational route through the N=2 mirror dualities of [23–25] is deferred, with one reference 'to appear'. That puts a real burden on the reader. Third, the regime is mostly Ns >= 2N; the Ns < 2N cases are a partial, advertised extension.

Is the central argument sound? As a conjecture with strong circumstantial support, yes. The checks are the right kind of evidence for this subfield—consistency, limits, and mass flows—and I found no internal contradiction. The dynamics of the engineered potential is the honest weak point, and the authors say so. This is a paper for the 3d-duality specialist. It deserves a serious referee: send it out. If I were refereeing, I would ask for the introduction to state plainly what is conjecture and what is checked, and for an explicit statement of how much of the program depends on [25].

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a new class of conjectured infrared dualities: SU(N) and U(N) Chern-Simons QCD in 2+1 dimensions with N_s fundamental scalars and N_f fundamental fermions are claimed to be dual to Abelian gauge theories with a planar quiver structure. The dual quivers combine U(1) gauge nodes, mixed Chern-Simons/BF couplings, monopole potentials, and Gross-Neveu-Yukawa terms, and the proposed identification exchanges the non-Abelian flavor symmetries of the electric theory with topological symmetries of the quiver. Mesons, baryons, and conserved currents are mapped to suitably dressed monopole operators, and the paper presents explicit examples for SU(2) and SU(3), extensions to U(N), mass-deformation flows, a particle-vortex consistency check, and a TQFT duality check. The proposal is explicitly motivated by the authors' earlier N=2 supersymmetric planar mirror dualities, and the precise non-supersymmetric RG flow is left for future work.

Significance. If the central conjecture is correct, the paper provides a large new family of non-Abelian bosonization dualities in 2+1 dimensions, with an unusually explicit operator dictionary that is checked by detailed monopole charge computations. The paper has several genuine strengths: the gauge-charge and dressing computations in Section 3.2 and Appendix A are explicit and reproducible; the N=1 limit in Section 2 reproduces the known Abelian dualities of Karch-Robinson-Tong; the mass-deformation flows in Section 6.1 land on the same family of proposed dualities; the particle-vortex argument in Section 6.2 matches the known SU(2)_0 duality of Benini; and the TQFT check in Section 6.3 uses level/rank duality and Smith normal form analysis. However, the central claim rests on an asserted infrared enhancement of abelian topological symmetries to non-Abelian flavor symmetries, for which no derivation or conformal-dimension computation is supplied. Because the enhancement is exactly what makes the operator dictionary non-trivial, the proposal is best viewed as a well-motivated conjecture with strong circumstantial support rather than a demonstrated equivalence.

major comments (3)

[Section 3.1, Eq. (3.6); Section 4.1, Eq. (4.3)] The IR enhancement U(1)^Ns_top -> SU(Ns) x U(1) in Eq. (3.6), and its mixed analogue U(1)^(Ns+Nf)_top -> U(Ns) x U(Nf) in Eq. (4.3), is the load-bearing step of the proposal. It identifies the non-Abelian flavor symmetry of the electric theory with topological symmetries of the quiver, and every subsequent operator map in Sections 3.2-3.5, 4.2-4.3, and 5 presupposes that the spin-1 dressed monopoles become exactly conserved currents of the enhanced symmetry. The paper states this as a claim ('We further claim', 'We also claim') and supports it with rank matching and a fugacity parametrization, but it does not compute the conformal dimensions of the relevant monopoles or demonstrate that they form a conserved current multiplet. Without a derivation, or at least a controlled approximation (large-N, epsilon expansion, or bootstrap bounds), the duality remains a conjecture whose central content is precisely the unproved enhancement.
[Section 1, footnote 2; Section 6.1, Eqs. (6.1)-(6.3)] The claimed descent from the authors' N=2 planar mirror dualities [23-25] is not analyzed. The paper states that the non-supersymmetric dualities 'should emerge as mass deformations' of the supersymmetric ones, but the RG flow itself is not studied, and the reference [25] that is supposed to contain the relevant analysis is 'to appear'. Similarly, the mass-deformation maps in Section 6.1, e.g. Eq. (6.1) and Eqs. (6.2)-(6.3), are introduced as being 'partially inspired by the SUSY ancestor' rather than derived from a microscopically defined flow. The resulting checks therefore test the internal consistency of the proposed duality web, but they do not independently establish the enhancement in Eq. (3.6) or the non-supersymmetric flow.
[Section 3.2, around Eq. (3.18); Section 3.5] The proposed operator dictionary is not one-to-one. The paper acknowledges that multiple dressed monopole operators carry the same global charges and spin and are expected to mix, so that the electric meson φ_i φ̅_j is mapped to some unspecified linear combination of monopoles (Eq. (3.18)). Tables 1-10 list only representative minimal-flux monopoles. This makes the dictionary qualitative rather than fully predictive: without specifying the mixing, one cannot compute the scaling dimensions or OPE coefficients of the mapped operators, and the claim that the IR physics is 'exactly reproduced' by the quiver is not yet testable at the level of individual operators.

minor comments (5)

[Section 3.2] There is a typo: 'condidate' should be 'candidate'.
[Section 6.1] The phrase 'the we propose for SU(3)' should be 'the duality we propose for SU(3)'.
[Appendix B] The word 'fermionwic' appears to be a typo for 'fermionic'.
[Section 3.1] The counting of mesonic U(1) symmetries in Eq. (3.10) is asserted only for k=0, with a note that k>0 is 'more subtle'; since the general proposal includes k>0, a separate counting for that case would improve clarity.
[Section 5] The transition from SU(N) to U(N) by gauging the baryonic symmetry is described briefly, and the background CS level is said to be expected to be -2 based on the SUSY results; a more explicit derivation of that background level would strengthen the U(N) proposal.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the proposed dualities are conjectural, with independent consistency checks; self-citations are motivational and explicitly deferred.

full rationale

The paper presents a conjecture, not a derivation from its inputs. The central load-bearing assertion—the IR enhancement U(1)^Ns_top -> SU(Ns) x U(1) (Eq. 3.6) and U(1)^(Ns+Nf)_top -> U(Ns) x U(Nf) (Eq. 4.3)—is stated as a claim rather than derived; an unsupported assumption is a correctness risk, not circularity, because no equation of the paper reduces it to an input. The N=2 planar mirror dualities [23-25] are cited as motivation, but the paper explicitly says "an in-depth study of the RG flow from the N=2 to the non-supersymmetric dualities goes beyond the scope of this paper" (Sec. 1), and the companion [25] is "to appear"; the proposal is not logically forced by those citations. The operator dictionary is constructed after the duality is proposed and checked by explicit monopole charge/spin computations, so it does not define the duality into existence. The independent anchors mentioned by the authors—N=1 reduction to [31], agreement of the SU(2)_0 flow with [8], and the level/rank plus Delmastro-Gomis TQFT verification (Sec. 6.3)—provide external checks not fitted from the proposal. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no known result is repackaged as new. Hence no circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on three classes of inputs: (1) the authors' own supersymmetric planar mirror dualities [23-25], one unpublished, as the structural template; (2) non-perturbative IR symmetry enhancement in the quiver; (3) standard monopole operator technology (Appendix A). No numerical fitting to data is involved; the hand-chosen elements are the interaction potentials of the dual quiver (V_monopole, V_GNY) and the minimal-flux-dressing rule for operator maps.

free parameters (2)

Monopole potential terms V_monopole = GNO fluxes +1/-1 on vertical node pairs
The specific flux assignments and dressings that make the monopoles gauge-invariant and break each column's topological symmetry are chosen by hand for each quiver (Sections 3.1, 4.1); they are part of the proposed dual, not derived from a parent action.
GNY potential coefficients = coefficient +1 per charge assignment (e.g., Eq. 3.2)
The real scalar Yukawa couplings are written down per quiver; their form is motivated by mass-deformation consistency but is fixed by hand.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption The N=2 supersymmetric planar mirror dualities of [23-25] are valid and give the quiver topology for the non-supersymmetric case.
Invoked in footnote 2 and Section 3.1 as the origin of the non-supersymmetric dualities; [25] is listed as 'to appear', and the N=2 to non-SUSY RG flow is stated to be beyond the scope.
domain assumption IR enhancement U(1)^Ns_top -> SU(Ns) x U(1) of the topological symmetries of the planar quiver.
Equations 3.6 and 4.3; the entire global symmetry matching and operator dictionary depend on this non-perturbative enhancement, asserted without derivation.
standard math Monopole operator technology: gauge charges from CS-level shifts and statistical transmutation of zero modes (Appendix A).
Relied on throughout the operator maps; standard in the literature [37-39, 49-56], and the paper provides a self-contained review in Appendix A.

invented entities (2)

Planar Abelian quiver dual theories
purpose: Proposed as the IR dual of SU(N)/U(N) CS-QCD3 with scalars and fermions; interactions encoded in the planar quiver geometry.
New conjectured objects; evidence is internal consistency (operator maps, mass flows) and recovery of known dualities in limits, not an independent falsifiable handle.
Monopole potentials V_monopole with flux +1/-1 per vertical scalar
purpose: Break each column's topological U(1) to the diagonal combination so global symmetry rank matches the electric theory.
Ad hoc to the construction; Appendix A shows the needed monopoles are gauge-invariant scalars after dressing, but their presence in the action is postulated.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Planar Abelian Duals of Chern-Simons QCD." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HS6IMA4C

@misc{pith2026250605465,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Planar Abelian Duals of Chern-Simons QCD},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HS6IMA4C}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.05465}
}

read the original abstract

We propose novel infrared dualities connecting 2+1 dimensional non-Abelian gauge theories (with unitary or special unitary gauge groups) to Abelian gauge theories. The dual Abelian theories are characterized by a planar quiver structure, where interactions are fully encoded in the quiver diagram. These dualities are rooted in supersymmetric mirror symmetry and display the characteristic exchange of mesonic and monopole operators. Furthermore, our proposed dualities exhibit features of bosonization: the addition of a fermionic (bosonic) flavor to the non-Abelian side corresponds to the addition of a bosonic (fermionic) column in the dual planar quiver.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages

[25]

Benvenuti, R

S. Benvenuti, R. Comi, S. Pasquetti, G. Pedde Ungureanu, S. Rota and A. Shri, Phases of 3d N = 2 Chern-Simons-Matter Theories, to appear (2025)

work page 2025
[1]

Giombi, S

S. Giombi, S. Minwalla, S. Prakash, S.P. Trivedi, S.R. Wadia and X. Yin, Chern-Simons Theory with Vector Fermion Matter , Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2112 [ 1110.4386]

arXiv 2012
[2]

Aharony, G

O. Aharony, G. Gur-Ari and R. Yacoby, d=3 Bosonic Vector Models Coupled to Chern-Simons Gauge Theories , JHEP 03 (2012) 037 [ 1110.4382]

arXiv 2012
[3]

Chern Simons Bosonization along RG Flows

S. Minwalla and S. Yokoyama, Chern Simons Bosonization along RG Flows , JHEP 02 (2016) 103 [ 1507.04546]

work page Pith review arXiv 2016
[4]

Aharony, Baryons, monopoles and dualities in Chern-Simons-matter theories , JHEP 02 (2016) 093 [ 1512.00161]

O. Aharony, Baryons, monopoles and dualities in Chern-Simons-matter theories , JHEP 02 (2016) 093 [ 1512.00161]

arXiv 2016
[5]

Son, Is the Composite Fermion a Dirac Particle? , Phys

D.T. Son, Is the Composite Fermion a Dirac Particle? , Phys. Rev. X 5 (2015) 031027 [1502.03446]

arXiv 2015
[6]

Metlitski and A

M.A. Metlitski and A. Vishwanath, Particle-vortex duality of two-dimensional Dirac fermion from electric-magnetic duality of three-dimensional topological insulators , Phys. Rev. B 93 (2016) 245151 [ 1505.05142]

arXiv 2016
[7]

Seiberg, T

N. Seiberg, T. Senthil, C. Wang and E. Witten, A Duality Web in 2+1 Dimensions and Condensed Matter Physics , Annals Phys. 374 (2016) 395 [ 1606.01989]

arXiv 2016

Show all 58 references

[8]

Benini, Three-dimensional dualities with bosons and fermions , JHEP 02 (2018) 068 [1712.00020]

F. Benini, Three-dimensional dualities with bosons and fermions , JHEP 02 (2018) 068 [1712.00020]

2018 arXiv
[9]

Senthil, D.T

T. Senthil, D.T. Son, C. Wang and C. Xu, Duality between (2 + 1)d Quantum Critical Points, Phys. Rept. 827 (2019) 1 [ 1810.05174]

2019 arXiv
[10]

Turner, Dualities in 2+1 Dimensions , PoS Modave2018 (2019) 001 [ 1905.12656]

C. Turner, Dualities in 2+1 Dimensions , PoS Modave2018 (2019) 001 [ 1905.12656]

2019 arXiv
[11]

S. Jain, S. Minwalla and S. Yokoyama, Chern Simons duality with a fundamental boson and fermion, JHEP 11 (2013) 037 [ 1305.7235]. – 62 –

2013 arXiv
[12]

Gur-Ari and R

G. Gur-Ari and R. Yacoby, Three Dimensional Bosonization From Supersymmetry, JHEP 11 (2015) 013 [ 1507.04378]

2015 arXiv
[13]

Karch and D

A. Karch and D. Tong, Particle-Vortex Duality from 3d Bosonization , Phys. Rev. X 6 (2016) 031043 [1606.01893]

2016 arXiv
[14]

Kachru, M

S. Kachru, M. Mulligan, G. Torroba and H. Wang, Bosonization and Mirror Symmetry , Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 085009 [ 1608.05077]

2016 arXiv
[15]

Kachru, M

S. Kachru, M. Mulligan, G. Torroba and H. Wang, Nonsupersymmetric dualities from mirror symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 011602 [ 1609.02149]

2017 arXiv
[16]

Karch, D

A. Karch, D. Tong and C. Turner, Mirror Symmetry and Bosonization in 2d and 3d , JHEP 07 (2018) 059 [ 1805.00941]

2018 arXiv
[17]

Hanany and K.D

A. Hanany and K.D. Kennaway, Dimer models and toric diagrams , hep-th/0503149

arXiv
[18]

Franco, A

S. Franco, A. Hanany, K.D. Kennaway, D. Vegh and B. Wecht, Brane dimers and quiver gauge theories, JHEP 01 (2006) 096 [ hep-th/0504110]

2006 arXiv
[19]

Benvenuti and M

S. Benvenuti and M. Kruczenski, Semiclassical strings in Sasaki-Einstein manifolds and long operators in N = 1 gauge theories, JHEP 10 (2006) 051 [ hep-th/0505046]

2006 arXiv
[20]

Benvenuti and M

S. Benvenuti and M. Kruczenski, From Sasaki-Einstein spaces to quivers via BPS geodesics: Lp,q|r, JHEP 04 (2006) 033 [ hep-th/0505206]

2006 arXiv
[21]

Franco, A

S. Franco, A. Hanany, D. Martelli, J. Sparks, D. Vegh and B. Wecht, Gauge theories from toric geometry and brane tilings , JHEP 01 (2006) 128 [ hep-th/0505211]

2006 arXiv
[22]

Butti, D

A. Butti, D. Forcella and A. Zaffaroni, The Dual superconformal theory for L**pqr manifolds, JHEP 09 (2005) 018 [ hep-th/0505220]

2005 arXiv
[23]

Benvenuti, R

S. Benvenuti, R. Comi, S. Pasquetti, G. Pedde Ungureanu, S. Rota and A. Shri, Planar Abelian Mirror Duals of N = 2 SQCD3, 2411.05620

arXiv
[24]

Benvenuti, R

S. Benvenuti, R. Comi, S. Pasquetti, G. Pedde Ungureanu, S. Rota and A. Shri, A Chiral-Planar dualization algorithm for 3d N = 2 Chern-Simons-matter theories, 2505.02913

arXiv
[26]

Intriligator and N

K.A. Intriligator and N. Seiberg, Mirror symmetry in three-dimensional gauge theories , Phys. Lett. B 387 (1996) 513 [ hep-th/9607207]

1996 arXiv
[27]

Hanany and E

A. Hanany and E. Witten, Type IIB superstrings, BPS monopoles, and three-dimensional gauge dynamics , Nucl. Phys. B 492 (1997) 152 [ hep-th/9611230]

1997 arXiv
[28]

Shaji, R

N. Shaji, R. Shankar and M. Sivakumar, On Bose-fermi Equivalence in a U(1) Gauge Theory With Chern-Simons Action , Mod. Phys. Lett. A 5 (1990) 593

1990
[29]

Chen, M.P.A

W. Chen, M.P.A. Fisher and Y.-S. Wu, Mott transition in an anyon gas , Phys. Rev. B 48 (1993) 13749 [ cond-mat/9301037]

1993 arXiv
[30]

Fradkin and F.A

E.H. Fradkin and F.A. Schaposnik, The Fermion - boson mapping in three-dimensional quantum field theory , Phys. Lett. B 338 (1994) 253 [ hep-th/9407182]

1994 arXiv
[31]

Karch, B

A. Karch, B. Robinson and D. Tong, More Abelian Dualities in 2+1 Dimensions , JHEP 01 (2017) 017 [ 1609.04012]. – 63 –

2017 arXiv
[32]

Benvenuti, R

S. Benvenuti, R. Comi and S. Pasquetti, Mirror dualities with four supercharges , JHEP 10 (2024) 234

2024
[33]

R. Comi, C. Hwang, F. Marino, S. Pasquetti and M. Sacchi, The SL(2, Z) dualization algorithm at work , JHEP 06 (2023) 119 [ 2212.10571]

2023 arXiv
[34]

Benini, P.-S

F. Benini, P.-S. Hsin and N. Seiberg, Comments on global symmetries, anomalies, and duality in (2 + 1)d , JHEP 04 (2017) 135 [ 1702.07035]

2017 arXiv
[35]

Bando, T

M. Bando, T. Kugo and K. Yamawaki, Nonlinear Realization and Hidden Local Symmetries , Phys. Rept. 164 (1988) 217

1988
[36]

Nakahara, Geometry, topology and physics , Institute of Physics Publishing, The Institute of Physics, London (2003)

M. Nakahara, Geometry, topology and physics , Institute of Physics Publishing, The Institute of Physics, London (2003)

2003
[37]

Borokhov, A

V. Borokhov, A. Kapustin and X. Wu, Topological disorder operators in three-dimensional conformal field theory , Journal of High Energy Physics 2002 (2002) 049–049

2002
[38]

Pufu, Anomalous dimensions of monopole operators in three-dimensional quantum electrodynamics, Phys

S.S. Pufu, Anomalous dimensions of monopole operators in three-dimensional quantum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 065016 [ 1303.6125]

2014 arXiv
[39]

Chester, L.V

S.M. Chester, L.V. Iliesiu, M. Mezei and S.S. Pufu, Monopole operators in U(1) Chern-Simons-matter theories, Journal of High Energy Physics 2018 (2018)

2018
[40]

Edward Witten, SL(2, Z) Action On Three-Dimensional Conformal Field Theories With Abelian Symmetry, hep-th/0307041

arXiv
[41]

Einhorn and R

M.B. Einhorn and R. Savit, Topological Excitations in the Abelian Higgs Model , Phys. Rev. D 17 (1978) 2583

1978
[42]

Peskin, Mandelstam ’t Hooft Duality in Abelian Lattice Models , Annals Phys

M.E. Peskin, Mandelstam ’t Hooft Duality in Abelian Lattice Models , Annals Phys. 113 (1978) 122

1978
[43]

Fisher and D.H

M.P.A. Fisher and D.H. Lee, Correspondence between two-dimensional bosons and a bulk superconductor in a magnetic field , Phys. Rev. B 39 (1989) 2756

1989
[44]

Savit, Duality in Field Theory and Statistical Systems , Rev

R. Savit, Duality in Field Theory and Statistical Systems , Rev. Mod. Phys. 52 (1980) 453

1980
[45]

Delmastro and J

D. Delmastro and J. Gomis, Symmetries of Abelian Chern-Simons Theories and Arithmetic , JHEP 03 (2021) 006 [ 1904.12884]

2021 arXiv
[46]

Ellis, TikZ-Feynman: Feynman diagrams with TikZ , Computer Physics Communications 210 (2017) 103–123

J.P. Ellis, TikZ-Feynman: Feynman diagrams with TikZ , Computer Physics Communications 210 (2017) 103–123

2017
[47]

Witten, Fermion path integrals and topological phases , Reviews of Modern Physics 88 (2016)

E. Witten, Fermion path integrals and topological phases , Reviews of Modern Physics 88 (2016)

2016
[48]

Seiberg and E

N. Seiberg and E. Witten, Gapped boundary phases of topological insulators via weak coupling, 1602.04251

arXiv
[49]

Aharony, P

O. Aharony, P. Narayan and T. Sharma, On monopole operators in supersymmetric Chern-Simons-matter theories, JHEP 05 (2015) 117 [ 1502.00945]

2015 arXiv
[50]

Goldhaber, Spin and Statistics Connection for Charge-Monopole Composites , Phys

A.S. Goldhaber, Spin and Statistics Connection for Charge-Monopole Composites , Phys. Rev. Lett. 36 (1976) 1122

1976
[51]

Wu and C.N

T.T. Wu and C.N. Yang, Dirac Monopole Without Strings: Monopole Harmonics , Nucl. Phys. B 107 (1976) 365

1976
[52]

Wilczek, Magnetic Flux, Angular Momentum, and Statistics , Phys

F. Wilczek, Magnetic Flux, Angular Momentum, and Statistics , Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 1144. – 64 –

1982
[53]

Polyakov, Fermi-Bose Transmutations Induced by Gauge Fields , Mod

A.M. Polyakov, Fermi-Bose Transmutations Induced by Gauge Fields , Mod. Phys. Lett. A 3 (1988) 325

1988
[54]

Grundberg, T.H

J. Grundberg, T.H. Hansson, A. Karlhede and U. Lindstrom, Spin, Statistics and Linked Loops, Phys. Lett. B 218 (1989) 321

1989
[55]

Wilczek, Statistical transmutation and phases of two-dimensional quantum matter , cond-mat/9509085

F. Wilczek, Statistical transmutation and phases of two-dimensional quantum matter , cond-mat/9509085

arXiv
[56]

E. Dyer, M. Mezei and S.S. Pufu, Monopole Taxonomy in Three-Dimensional Conformal Field Theories, 1309.1160

arXiv
[57]

Benvenuti and H

S. Benvenuti and H. Khachatryan, QED’s in 2+1 dimensions: complex fixed points and dualities, 1812.01544

arXiv
[58]

Benvenuti and H

S. Benvenuti and H. Khachatryan, Easy-plane QED 3’s in the large N f limit, JHEP 05 (2019) 214 [ 1902.05767]. – 65 –

2019 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [25]

Benvenuti, R

S. Benvenuti, R. Comi, S. Pasquetti, G. Pedde Ungureanu, S. Rota and A. Shri, Phases of 3d N = 2 Chern-Simons-Matter Theories, to appear (2025)

work page 2025

[2] [1]

Giombi, S

S. Giombi, S. Minwalla, S. Prakash, S.P. Trivedi, S.R. Wadia and X. Yin, Chern-Simons Theory with Vector Fermion Matter , Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2112 [ 1110.4386]

arXiv 2012

[3] [2]

Aharony, G

O. Aharony, G. Gur-Ari and R. Yacoby, d=3 Bosonic Vector Models Coupled to Chern-Simons Gauge Theories , JHEP 03 (2012) 037 [ 1110.4382]

arXiv 2012

[4] [3]

Chern Simons Bosonization along RG Flows

S. Minwalla and S. Yokoyama, Chern Simons Bosonization along RG Flows , JHEP 02 (2016) 103 [ 1507.04546]

work page Pith review arXiv 2016

[5] [4]

Aharony, Baryons, monopoles and dualities in Chern-Simons-matter theories , JHEP 02 (2016) 093 [ 1512.00161]

O. Aharony, Baryons, monopoles and dualities in Chern-Simons-matter theories , JHEP 02 (2016) 093 [ 1512.00161]

arXiv 2016

[6] [5]

Son, Is the Composite Fermion a Dirac Particle? , Phys

D.T. Son, Is the Composite Fermion a Dirac Particle? , Phys. Rev. X 5 (2015) 031027 [1502.03446]

arXiv 2015

[7] [6]

Metlitski and A

M.A. Metlitski and A. Vishwanath, Particle-vortex duality of two-dimensional Dirac fermion from electric-magnetic duality of three-dimensional topological insulators , Phys. Rev. B 93 (2016) 245151 [ 1505.05142]

arXiv 2016

[8] [7]

Seiberg, T

N. Seiberg, T. Senthil, C. Wang and E. Witten, A Duality Web in 2+1 Dimensions and Condensed Matter Physics , Annals Phys. 374 (2016) 395 [ 1606.01989]

arXiv 2016