Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 41 references

An optical frequency shifter based on continuous-wave pump fields

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Continuous-wave lasers in a hydrogen-filled hollow-core fiber convert 914-nm probe photons to 1474-nm telecom light with 0.27% internal efficiency, and the conversion efficiency grows quadratically with fiber length.

desk verdict A useful CW Raman conversion study, but the efficiency claims are undermined by an unstated background-subtraction question and an internal inconsistency in the quoted scaling. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.05989 v1 pith:KQWBOTPC submitted 2025-06-06 quant-ph

Anica Hamer , Frank Vewinger , Michael H. Frosz , Simon Stellmer This is my paper
classification quant-ph PACS 42.65.Dr
keywords quantumfrequencyconversioncoherentStokesRamanscatteringhollow-corefibermolecularhydrogencontinuous-wavepumptelecomS-bandbackgroundefficiency
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that a hydrogen-filled hollow-core fiber (a fiber that guides light through a gas-filled core rather than through glass) driven by two continuous-wave pump lasers can act as a frequency shifter for quantum-network photons, converting $914$-nm probe light into $1474$-nm telecom S-band light while preserving polarization. The new result is that the internal conversion efficiency grows quadratically with fiber length over the tested range of $0.27$ m to $1.85$ m, with a fitted scaling of $0.0044(6)\,\%/(\mathrm{W}^2\,\mathrm{m}^2)$ and a best measured internal efficiency of $0.27\%$ at the maximum available pump powers. The paper also quantifies what limits longer fibers: propagation loss at the probe wavelength, bend loss that shifts the optimum pressure, and two parasitic hydrogen Raman lines that inject background counts near the signal wavelength. If the claims hold, this is a route toward state-preserving single-photon frequency conversion with continuous-wave sources rather than pulsed lasers, which matters because quantum networks need photons converted between incompatible wavelength bands without disturbing their quantum state.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is coherent Stokes Raman scattering (CSRS) driven by a molecular coherence in hydrogen: two continuous-wave pumps at $1550$ nm and $942$ nm, whose beat note matches the $Q_1(1)$ vibrational transition at $125$ THz, write a coherence that converts the $914$-nm probe into the $1474$-nm signal. The workhorse identity is the efficiency scaling $\eta \propto |\chi^{(3)}(\omega)|^2 L^2 \operatorname{sinc}^2(\Delta\beta(p) L/2)\, I_{\mathrm{pump1}}I_{\mathrm{pump2}}$, where the phase mismatch $\Delta\beta$ is computed from propagation constants built on the analytic dispersion model for anti-resonant hollow-core fibers (Ref. [28]); the cut-back procedure isolates the $L^2$ factor of this formula. Secondary machinery includes the critical bend radius $R_{l,m}$ for capillary-mode coupling, a saturation curve $p_{\mathrm{opt}} = p_{\max}(1-e^{-b(r-r_0)})$ fitted to the optimum-pressure data, and molecular line assignments that identify the parasitic background lines.

What would settle it

Switch off the $914$-nm probe and count photons at $1474$ nm through a filter narrower than $1$ nm, repeating the measurement with each pump blocked in turn: if the $1474$-nm photon rate does not fall to near the APD dark count of about $270$ per second, or if the fitted length scaling changes after narrow-band filtering, then the reported $0.27\%$ efficiency and $0.0044(6)\,\%/(\mathrm{W}^2\,\mathrm{m}^2)$ scaling include parasitic Raman background rather than pure CSRS signal.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central claim is experimental: in a commercial anti-resonant hollow-core fiber filled with hydrogen at high pressure, two continuous-wave pump fields whose frequency difference matches the $Q_1(1)$ vibrational transition of molecular hydrogen at $125$ THz drive a coherent Stokes Raman scattering (CSRS) process that converts a $914$-nm probe photon into a $1474$-nm signal photon. The authors cut the fiber back to lengths of $1.85$ m, $1.47$ m, $1.16$ m, and $0.27$ m and fit the expected $\eta \propto |\chi^{(3)}|^2 L^2 \operatorname{sinc}^2(\Delta\beta L/2)\, I_{\mathrm{pump1}}I_{\mathrm{pump2}}$ dependence, corrected for measured transmission losses, obtaining a length-scaling coefficient of $0.0044(6)\,\%/(\mathrm{W}^2\,\mathrm{m}^2)$; at the maximum available pump powers of $3.87$ W and $12.6$ W they infer an internal efficiency of $\eta_{\max} = 0.27\%$. The paper further reports that the optimum phase-matching pressure rises with bend radius and saturates above roughly $30$ cm, and that two parasitic Raman transitions of hydrogen produce background photons at $1468.6$ nm and $1469.3$ nm that pass the $25$-nm bandpass filter.

Load-bearing premise

The quoted efficiencies and the length-scaling fit assume that every detected photon at $1474$ nm is genuine signal, but the paper does not state whether the roughly one million counts per second of background from two parasitic hydrogen Raman lines at $1468.6$ nm and $1469.3$ nm were subtracted before the efficiencies were computed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the quadratic length scaling holds beyond $1.85$ m, lengthening the fiber at the same pump powers is a direct route to efficiencies above $1\%$, and the paper projects about $70\%$ for a $21$-m fiber with lower losses.
  • The process preserves polarization and runs on continuous-wave lasers, so a quantum-network node needing state-preserving conversion between the near-infrared and the telecom S-band could use this scheme without pulsed sources.
  • Propagation loss at the probe wavelength ($0.93(37)$ dB/m at $914$ nm) dominates the total, so shifting the fiber's capillary-wall resonance away from $914$ nm is the clearest single improvement.
  • Bend radii below about $10$ cm destroy coupling to the $LP_{01}$ mode entirely, and resonant bend losses set in below a critical radius of about $24$ cm, which constrains how tightly the fiber can be packaged.
  • Because the parasitic $1468.6$-nm and $1469.3$-nm lines pass the $25$-nm bandpass filter, a deployed device needs narrow-band filtering or a different signal wavelength to reach low-background operation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An implication the authors leave implicit: the reported $0.27\%$ internal efficiency may include counts from the two parasitic Raman lines, so until narrow-band filtering confirms otherwise, the honest reading is that $0.27\%$ is an upper bound on the CSRS signal conversion.
  • The same $Q_1(1)$ coherence should translate any probe wavelength by the fixed $125$-THz shift, making this pair one instance of a general continuous-wave-driven translator across the near-infrared-to-telecom window.
  • The $21$-m, $70\%$ projection extrapolates a quadratic law measured only up to $1.85$ m; measuring at intermediate lengths of roughly $5$ m and $10$ m in the lower-loss fiber would test the extrapolation before building a full-scale device.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports continuous-wave coherent Stokes/anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CSRS) frequency conversion from 914 nm to 1474 nm in a hydrogen-filled anti-resonant hollow-core fiber. The authors present cut-back measurements at four fiber lengths, extract a length-scaling coefficient of 0.0044(6) %/(W^2 m^2), and report a maximum internal efficiency of 0.27% at pump powers of 3.87 W (942 nm) and 12.6 W (1550 nm). They also characterize transmission losses for the three input fields, study bend-loss effects on the optimal pressure, and identify two parasitic hydrogen Raman lines at 1468.6 nm and 1469.3 nm that pass the detection bandpass filter. The paper closes with an extrapolation to a 21 m fiber that would yield 70% conversion efficiency under assumed loss parameters.

Significance. The central experimental result is potentially valuable for quantum frequency conversion in the telecom band, since it demonstrates few-per-mille conversion efficiency with continuous-wave pumps in a gas-filled hollow-core fiber and identifies a path toward longer interaction lengths. The paper has several concrete strengths: the cut-back efficiency data are compared with a standard model (Eq. 1) corrected for measured transmission losses, the parasitic Raman lines are identified using HITRAN data with quantitative background rates, and the bend-loss analysis connects the operating pressure to the fiber geometry. However, the quantitative claims of 0.27% efficiency and quadratic length scaling currently hinge on an unstated background-subtraction procedure for the parasitic Raman lines, and on a fit to only four fiber lengths. If the background subtraction is clarified and the scaling analysis is made more explicit, the work would be a solid incremental contribution; as written, the central numbers are not fully established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III B 3 and Fig. 3] The text reports parasitic Raman backgrounds of approximately 7e5 cps from the 942 nm pump and 5.5e5 cps from the 1550 nm pump at 1468.6 nm and 1469.3 nm, respectively, both within the 25 nm bandpass filter. However, the paper never states whether the efficiency data in Fig. 3 and the quoted eta_max = 0.27% were corrected by subtracting these backgrounds. Since the efficiency is defined as the detected 1474 nm photon rate divided by the incoming 914 nm photon rate, an uncorrected constant background would inflate the apparent efficiency and, because the background is independent of the probe, it would distort the length-dependence curve. Please state explicitly whether and how this background was subtracted, and provide the uncertainty that includes the subtraction.
  2. [Section III A and Fig. 3] The quadratic length-scaling claim rests on a fit to only four cut-back lengths (1.85, 1.47, 1.16, and 0.27 m), with the shortest point obtained for an unwound fiber under different bend conditions. The manuscript does not report the fit residuals, the uncertainty in the fitted exponent, or a comparison with a linear or saturation model. Please report the full fit details, including which losses were corrected and how, the confidence interval of the scaling exponent, and a sensitivity check that shows whether the conclusion changes when the 0.27 m point is excluded.
  3. [Section III A and Section II] The definition of 'internal efficiency' is ambiguous. The measurement is a detected photon rate on an APD with 10% detection efficiency and an approximately 270 cps dark count rate, but the paper does not state whether the quoted efficiencies include corrections for APD efficiency, output coupling, filtering, and dark-count subtraction. Because eta_max = 0.27% is the headline result, the exact conversion between the measured photon rate and the reported efficiency should be given explicitly.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section III B 2] The text says 'the fourth fiber of 0.27(20) m length', which is inconsistent with the stated length 0.27(2) m in Section III A and in the Fig. 5 caption; this appears to be a typographical error and should be corrected.
  2. [Section IV and Fig. 7] There are typographical errors in the conclusion ('otical components') and in the Fig. 7 caption ('Schemtic overview'), which should be fixed.
  3. [Section II and Section III B 1] The capillary wall thickness is inferred by matching the optimal-pressure data to the Zeisberger model, and the same model is then used to discuss phase matching; the paper should state explicitly that this is not an independent validation of the wall thickness.
  4. [Section IV] The 70% efficiency projection for a 21 m fiber assumes quadratic scaling, 83% incoupling, 15.9 dB/km attenuation at all wavelengths, and unchanged parasitic backgrounds; these assumptions should be labeled explicitly as an idealized extrapolation rather than a measured expectation, and a sensitivity estimate would improve the clarity.
  5. [Fig. 3] The figure would benefit from error bars on the data points and from a clear indication of which points are raw measured efficiencies and which are corrected for transmission losses.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central efficiency measurement is compared with standard CSRS theory and independent loss measurements.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an experimental measurement: the 1474 nm conversion efficiency at several fiber lengths (Fig. 3), fit to the standard CSRS scaling relation Eq. 1 with transmission losses fixed by separate cut-back measurements (Sec. III B 1). The fitted coefficient 0.0044(6) %/(W²m²) is a fit to the data, not an output of the same fit presented as an independent prediction. The capillary wall thickness (1280 nm) is stated to be inferred by comparing optimal-pressure data with the Zeisberger model, i.e., a calibration rather than a prediction; the paper does not use that value to generate the efficiency data. The 70% projection in the Conclusion assumes quadratic scaling and parameters from the authors' earlier work, but it is explicitly a route for future improvement and is not load-bearing for the demonstrated 0.27% efficiency. No equation is reduced to its own input, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The possible inclusion of parasitic Raman background in the efficiency data is a measurement-contamination concern, not a circularity of the derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central experimental claims rest on standard Raman theory and a dispersion model, plus a few fitted quantities. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced; the Raman transitions, fiber modes, and optical fields are established physical objects. The paper's own extrapolation to 70% efficiency rests on untested assumptions about a longer fiber, which is why those assumptions are listed as ad hoc.

free parameters (3)
  • Capillary wall thickness = ≈1280 nm (inferred)
    The thickness is not directly measured; it is obtained by comparing optimal-pressure conversion data with the Zeisberger model (Sec. II), then used in the same model for phase-matching and loss calculations.
  • Transmission loss parameters for the three input wavelengths = α1550nm = 0.07(4) dB/m, α942nm = 0.37(16) dB/m, α914nm = 0.93(37) dB/m
    These are fitted from cut-back transmission data (Fig. 4) and are used to correct the efficiency-versus-length fit, so the central scaling claim depends on them.
  • Saturation-curve parameters for popt versus bend radius = pmax ≈ 83(2) bar, plus b and r0 from Eq. 4
    Used as a guide to the eye for the optimal-pressure versus bend-radius data in Fig. 5; this is not load-bearing for the central efficiency claim but is a fitted number in the paper.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption CSRS efficiency follows η ∝ |χ(3)|² L² sinc²(Δβ L/2) I_pump1 I_pump2 (Eq. 1).
    Standard coherent Raman scattering model used to fit the length-scaling data and to project efficiency at longer fiber lengths.
  • domain assumption The Zeisberger-Hartung-Schmidt model gives the effective refractive index neff(p,λ) of the anti-resonant hollow-core fiber.
    Used to compute the phase-matching term Δβ and the optimal hydrogen pressure; the capillary wall thickness entering the model is inferred from the same pressure data (see free parameters).
  • domain assumption Hydrogen Raman line positions and strengths are taken from HITRAN2020 and Black & van Dishoeck.
    Used in Sec. III B 3 to identify the 1-0 O(2) and 0-0 S(0) transitions as the source of parasitic background.
  • domain assumption The 1474 nm count rate attributed to the CSRS signal is not contaminated by unsubtracted parasitic Raman background.
    The paper does not explicitly state that efficiency data were background-subtracted, despite two parasitic lines passing the 25 nm filter.
  • ad hoc to paper A future 21 m fiber will have 83% incoupling, 15.9 dB/km attenuation at all wavelengths, and preserve the observed L² scaling.
    These values are assumed in Sec. IV to project 70% efficiency; they are not measured in this paper and conflict in spirit with the measured bend-radius sensitivity.
  • domain assumption The critical bend radius follows Eq. 2 from Refs [29,30].
    Used to interpret the optimal-pressure versus bend-radius data in Fig. 5.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of An optical frequency shifter based on continuous-wave pump fields." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KQWBOTPC

@misc{pith2026250605989,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: An optical frequency shifter based on continuous-wave pump fields},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KQWBOTPC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.05989}
}
read the original abstract

Practical implementations of quantum information networks require frequency conversion of individual photons. Approaches based on a molecular gas as the nonlinear medium cover a wide range of the optical spectrum and promise high efficiency at negligible background. We present polarization-preserving frequency conversion in a hydrogen-loaded hollow core fiber using continuous-wave pump fields. We demonstrate conversion efficiency at the level of a few per mille, discuss various limitations and loss mechanisms, and present a route to increase conversion efficiency to near unity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.05989 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic overview of the fiber and the four light [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Schematic depiction of the fiber (blue) inside a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Transmission losses for the three incoming light [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Optimal pressure for the CSRS process in depen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Schemtic overview of the here used Raman line [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_7.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    They occur as broad resonances in the absorption spec- trum, where the position of the resonances depends criti- cally on the wall thickness of the capillaries

    Transmission loss Coupling between the core modes and capillary wall modes contributes to the transmission losses [10, 28]. They occur as broad resonances in the absorption spec- trum, where the position of the resonances depends criti- cally on the wall thickness of the capillaries. For the fiber used here, the wall thickness is about 1 .28 µm. Here, we ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    4) are bend losses

    Bend losses Another aspect of the transmission losses (Fig. 4) are bend losses. Due to the length of the fiber, the fiber needed to be wound (Fig. 2) to fit on the optical table. Depending on the bend radius, the core mode can couple to cladding capillary modes, leading to high losses [29– 31]. We measured the optimal pressure popt relevant for the effect...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Parasitic Raman processes in hydrogen Not only is efficiency an important factor for the us- ability of frequency conversion, but also a low back- ground. While frequency conversion in crystals often struggles with undesired Raman scattering, it is mini- mized in hollow-core fibers due to the minimal overlap between the cladding and the core mode [10]. An...

    work page 2000

  4. [4]

    H. J. Kimble, The quantum internet, Nature 453, 1023 (2008)

    2008

  5. [5]

    R¨ utz, K.-H

    H. R¨ utz, K.-H. Luo, H. Suche, and C. Silberhorn, Quan- tum frequency conversion between infrared and ultravio- let, Phys. Rev. Appl. 7, 024021 (2017)

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Zaske, A

    S. Zaske, A. Lenhard, C. A. Keßler, J. Kettler, C. Hepp, C. Arend, R. Albrecht, W.-M. Schulz, M. Jetter, P. Mich- ler, and C. Becher, Visible-to-telecom quantum frequency conversion of light from a single quantum emitter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 147404 (2012)

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    Krutyanskiy, M

    V. Krutyanskiy, M. Meraner, J. Schupp, and B. P. Lanyon, Polarisation-preserving photon frequency con- version from a trapped-ion-compatible wavelength to the telecom C-band, Appl. Phys. B 123, 228 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Fisher, R

    P. Fisher, R. Cernansky, B. Haylock, and M. Lobino, Single photon frequency conversion for frequency mul- tiplexed quantum networks in the telecom band, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 023602 (2021)

    2021

Show all 41 references
  1. [9]

    B. A. Bell, K. Wang, A. S. Solntsev, D. N. Neshev, A. A. Sukhorukov, and B. J. Eggleton, Spectral photonic lat- tices with complex long-range coupling, Optica 4, 1433 (2017)

    2017

  2. [10]

    P. Y. Zhou, X. M. Dou, X. F. Wu, K. Ding, M. F. Li, H. Q. Ni, Z. C. Niu, D. S. Jiang, and B. Q. Sun, Single- photon property characterization of 1.3 µm emissions from InAs/GaAs quantum dots using silicon avalanche photodiodes, Scientific Reports 4, 3633 (2014)

    2014

  3. [11]

    Ikuta, Y

    R. Ikuta, Y. Kusaka, T. Kitano, H. Kato, T. Yamamoto, M. Koashi, and N. Imoto, Wide-band quantum interface for visible-to-telecommunication wavelength conversion, Nature Communications 2, 537 (2011)

    2011

  4. [12]

    De Greve, L

    K. De Greve, L. Yu, P. L. McMahon, J. S. Pelc, C. M. Natarajan, N. Y. Kim, E. Abe, S. Maier, C. Schnei- der, M. Kamp, S. H¨ ofling, R. H. Hadfield, A. Forchel, M. M. Fejer, and Y. Yamamoto, Quantum-dot spin– photon entanglement via frequency downconversion to telecom wavelengt...

    2012

  5. [13]

    Tyumenev, J

    R. Tyumenev, J. Hammer, N. Y. Joly, P. S. J. Russell, and D. Novoa, Tunable and state-preserving frequency conversion of single photons in hydrogen, Science 376, 621 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    P. J. Winzer, D. T. Neilson, and A. R. Chraplyvy, Fiber- optic transmission and networking: the previous 20 and the next 20 years, Opt. Express 26, 24190 (2018)

    2018

  7. [15]

    Deutsch, C

    D. Deutsch, C. Buchholz, V. Zolatanosha, K. D. J¨ ons, and D. Reuter, Telecom C-band photon emission from (In,Ga)As quantum dots generated by filling nanoholes in In0.52Al0.48As layers, AIP Advances 13, 055009 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    Eramo and M

    R. Eramo and M. Matera, Third-harmonic generation in positively dispersive gases with a novel cell, Appl. Opt. 33, 1691 (1994)

    1994

  9. [17]

    Tamaki, K

    T. Tamaki, K. Midirika, and M. Obara, Phase-matched third-harmonic generation by nonlinear phase shift in a hollow fiber, Appl. Phys. B 67, 59 (1998)

    1998

  10. [18]

    I. V. Babushkin and J. Herrmann, High energy sub-10 fs pulse generation in vacuum ultraviolet using chirped four wave mixing in hollow waveguides, Opt. Express16, 17774 (2008)

    2008

  11. [19]

    Cassataro, D

    M. Cassataro, D. Novoa, M. C. G¨ unendi, N. N. Edavalath, M. H. Frosz, J. C. Travers, and P. S. Russell, Generation of broadband mid-ir and uv light in gas-filled single-ring hollow-core pcf, Opt. Express 25, 7637 (2017)

    2017

  12. [20]

    J. A. Rowland, C. Perrella, R. F. Offer, A. N. Luiten, B. M. Sparkes, and T. J. Weinhold, Characterization of near-infrared to telecom frequency conversion in a rubidium-filled hollow-core photonic-crystal fiber (2024), arXiv:2412.13418 [physics.atom-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    R. W. Boyd, Chapter 1 - the nonlinear optical suscep- tibility, in Nonlinear Optics (Third Edition), edited by R. W. Boyd (Academic Press, Burlington, 2008) third edition ed

    2008

  14. [22]

    D. W. Shipp, F. Sinjab, and I. Notingher, Raman spec- troscopy: techniques and applications in the life sciences, Advances in Optics and Photonics 9, 315 (2017)

    2017

  15. [23]

    Rigneault and P

    H. Rigneault and P. Berto, Tutorial: Coherent Raman light matter interaction processes, APL Photonics 3, 091101 (2018)

    2018

  16. [24]

    Gr¨ ossle, B

    R. Gr¨ ossle, B. Bornschein, A. Kraus, S. Mirz, and 6 S. Wozniewski, Minimal and complete set of descriptors for IR-absorption spectra of liquid H2–D2 mixtures, AIP Advances 10, 055108 (2020)

    2020

  17. [25]

    Z.-Y. Tian, V. B. Mbayachi, X. Zhang, M. Khalil, and D. A. Ayejoto, Coherent anti-stokes raman scattering, in Advanced Diagnostics in Combustion Science(Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, 2023) pp. 179–222

    2023

  18. [26]

    Gonzalez-Raya, A

    T. Gonzalez-Raya, A. Mena, M. Lazo, L. Leggio, D. Novoa, and M. Sanz, Entanglement transfer during quantum frequency conversion in gas-filled hollow-core fibers, APL Photonics 10, 041302 (2025)

    2025

  19. [27]

    Javadi, I

    A. Javadi, I. S¨ ollner, M. Arcari, S. L. Hansen, L. Midolo, S. Mahmoodian, G. Kirˇ sansk˙ e, T. Pregnolato, E. H. Lee, J. D. Song, S. Stobbe, and P. Lodahl, Single-photon non- linear optics with a quantum dot in a waveguide, Nature Communications 6, 8655 (2015)

    2015

  20. [28]

    Aghababaei, C

    A. Aghababaei, C. Biesek, F. Vewinger, and S. Stellmer, Frequency conversion in pressurized hydrogen, Opt. Lett. 48, 45 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    Hamer, F

    A. Hamer, F. Vewinger, T. Peters, M. H. Frosz, and S. Stellmer, Frequency conversion in a hydrogen-filled hollow-core fiber using continuous-wave fields, Opt. Lett. 49, 6952 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    Hamer, F

    A. Hamer, F. Vewinger, M. H. Frosz, and S. Stellmer, Frequency conversion in a hydrogen-filled hollow-core fiber: power scaling, background, and bandwidth (2025), arXiv:2501.04049 [quant-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Zeisberger, A

    M. Zeisberger, A. Hartung, and M. A. Schmidt, Under- standing dispersion of revolver-type anti-resonant hollow core fibers, Fibers 6, 10.3390/fib6040068 (2018)

    2018 doi

  24. [32]

    M. H. Frosz, P. Roth, M. C. Gunendi, and P. S. J. Russell, Analytical formulation for the bend loss in single-ring hollow-core photonic crystal fibers, Photonics Research 5, 88 (2016)

    2016

  25. [33]

    R. M. Carter, F. Yu, W. J. Wadsworth, J. D. Shephard, T. Birks, J. C. Knight, and D. P. Hand, Measurement of resonant bend loss in anti-resonant hollow core optical fiber, Opt. Express 25, 20612 (2017)

    2017

  26. [34]

    E. N. Fokoua, S. A. Mousavi, G. T. Jasion, D. J. Richard- son, and F. Poletti, Loss in hollow-core optical fibers: mechanisms, scaling rules, and limits, Adv. Opt. Photon. 15, 1 (2023)

    2023

  27. [35]

    Bahari, K

    A. Bahari, K. Sower, K. Wang, Z. Han, J. Florence, Y. Wang, S. Gao, H. W. H. Lee, M. Scully, A. Zheltikov, and A. Sokolov, Background-penalty-free waveguide en- hancement of cars signal in air-filled anti-resonance hollow-core fiber, Opt. Lett. 47, 4339 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    Yu and J

    F. Yu and J. C. Knight, Negative curvature hollow-core optical fiber, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quan- tum Electronics 22, 146 (2016)

    2016

  29. [37]

    V. Zuba, H. C. H. Mulvad, R. Slav ´ ık, H. Sakr, F. Poletti, D. J. Richardson, and E. N. Fokoua, Limits of coupling efficiency into hollow-core antiresonant fibres, Journal of Lightwave Technology 41, 6374 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    E. A. J. Marcatili and R. A. Schmeltzer, Hollow metallic and dielectric waveguides for long distance optical trans- mission and lasers, The Bell System Technical Journal 43, 1783 (1964)

    1964

  31. [39]

    I. E. Gordon, L. S. Rothman, R. J. Hargreaves, R. Hashemi, E. V. Karlovets, F. M. Skinner, E. K. Con- way, C. Hill, R. V. Kochanov, Y. Tan, P. Wcis lo, A. A. Finenko, K. Nelson, P. F. Bernath, M. Birk, V. Boudon, A. Campargue, K. V. Chance, A. Coustenis, B. J. Drouin, J. M. Fl...

    2022

  32. [40]

    J. H. Black and E. F. van Dishoeck, Fluorescent Excita- tion of Interstellar H 2, Astrophys. J. 322, 412 (1987)

    1987

  33. [41]

    J. F. Ward and C. K. Miller, Measurements of nonlinear optical polarizabilities for twelve small molecules, Phys. Rev. A 19, 826 (1979)

    1979

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.