Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 48 references

Enhancing z spin generation in trivial spin Hall materials for scalable, energy-efficient, field-free, complete spin-orbit torque switching applications

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read PtTi alloy yields 6x stronger out-of-plane spin torque.

desk verdict A useful alloy result with an overstated mechanism story; the z-spin torque enhancement is real, but the bulk-σSH attribution needs more evidence. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.06628 v1 pith:GKQ2VSYI submitted 2025-06-07 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Qianbiao Liu , Lijun Zhu This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords spin-orbittorqueout-of-planespinpolarizationzcurrentHallconductivitytensorPtTialloyfield-freeswitchingperpendicularmagneticanisotropyST-FMR
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that a simple alloy, platinum doped with titanium (Pt75Ti25), can generate out-of-plane (z) spin currents as efficiently as the best low-symmetry crystals, and that this is enough to switch a perpendicularly magnetized ferromagnet without any external magnetic field. The z-spin dampinglike torque is enhanced about 6 times and the conventional y-spin torque about 3 times relative to Pt/FeCoB. The authors attribute the enhancement to alloying changing the spin Hall conductivity tensor of the heavy metal, with an additional boost from engineering the device's electric asymmetry through layer thicknesses and strip geometry. If correct, this removes a major obstacle for scalable spin-orbit-torque memory: field-free switching of high-coercivity FeCoB at record-low power.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the spin Hall conductivity tensor $\sigma_{SH}$ of the heavy metal, specifically its z-spin element $\sigma_{SH,z}$, which converts a charge current into a spin current polarized and flowing perpendicular to the film plane. The paper uses the relation $\xi_{DL,z}^{j} = T_{int} \sigma_{SH,z} \rho_{xx}$, where $T_{int}$ is the interface spin transparency and $\rho_{xx}$ the heavy-metal resistivity. The mechanism is carried by two levers: alloying Pt with Ti enlarges $\sigma_{SH,z}$, and electric asymmetry engineering, varying the PtTi thickness, FeCoB thickness, strip width and length, and the contact arrangement, further increases the z-spin torque in a way that matches finite-element simulations of the electric-field gradients in the device.

What would settle it

Measure the spin transparency of the PtTi/FeCoB interface directly, for example by spin pumping or by the NiO-interlayer method used previously; if the interface transparency changes appreciably when Pt is alloyed with Ti, the bulk spin Hall conductivity attribution collapses. A second check is a Hall bar with fully symmetric contacts: if a large dampinglike z-torque remains where the simulated electric asymmetry vanishes, an interface spin-swapping contribution is present.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central discovery is that alloying the trivial spin Hall metal Pt with 25% Ti alters the spin Hall conductivity tensor so that a perpendicularly polarized spin current (z spins) is generated, and that this effect can be multiplied by engineering the device's electric asymmetry. In Pt75Ti25/FeCoB, the dampinglike torque efficiency of z spins reaches 0.015 and is six times that of Pt/FeCoB, while the y-spin efficiency is three times larger; with a C-shaped contact, a PtTi/Ti/FeCoB Hall bar with perpendicular anisotropy field 490 mT and coercivity 28 mT switches completely and deterministically at about 7.9 mA (1.9×$10^{7}$ A/cm² in the PtTi) with no external field. The authors rule out current tilting as the cause, since a tilted current cannot produce a spin current polarized and flowing along z without a corresponding $\sigma_{SH,z}$ element, and rule out interface spin-swapping by showing the torque tracks the simulated electric asymmetries of the device geometry.

Load-bearing premise

The result hinges on the assumption that alloying does not change the interface spin transparency, so the entire 6-fold z-spin enhancement is assigned to the bulk spin Hall conductivity of PtTi rather than to interface effects.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Pt75Ti25/FeCoB can be switched completely and deterministically with no external magnetic field at about 1.9×10^7 A/cm², the lowest power parameter among the z-spin SOT devices compared.
  • Because the PtTi layer sputters uniformly onto 4-inch oxidized silicon wafers and survives 400 °C annealing, the scheme is compatible with CMOS backend integration and magnetic tunnel junction stacks.
  • The simultaneous 6-fold and 3-fold enhancement of z- and y-spin torques means field-free switching no longer requires low-symmetry crystals, thickness wedges, or composition gradients.
  • Alloying Pt with Ti shifts the spin Hall conductivity tensor, so the work points to a general route for engineering out-of-plane spin currents in trivial spin Hall metals.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next step the paper leaves open is first-principles screening of other Pt-transition-metal alloys: the reported geometry dependence gives a calculable target for $\sigma_{SH,z}$, so alloys with even larger z-spin efficiency could be predicted before fabrication.
  • The strong dependence on strip width and length suggests that sub-micron pillars with optimized contact shapes could push $\xi_{DL,z}^{j}$ well beyond the reported 0.015, lowering switching current further.
  • If the bulk attribution is right, earlier claims of field-free switching by current tilting in other systems deserve re-examination, because the paper's tensor argument implies a tilted current alone cannot create a z-polarized spin current.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports that co-sputtered Pt75Ti25/FeCoB heterostructures exhibit dampinglike spin-orbit torque efficiencies for z- and y-polarized spins that are larger than those of Pt/FeCoB (ξDL,z^j = 0.0119 vs 0.0016; ξDL,y^j ≈ 0.091 vs 0.030), and that these larger torques enable field-free, deterministic, complete switching of perpendicularly magnetized FeCoB Hall bars with Hc ≈ 28 mT at Ic ≈ 7.9 mA. The authors attribute the enhancement to alloying-induced modification of the bulk spin Hall conductivity tensor σ_SH,z, amplified by electric-asymmetry engineering through the PtTi thickness d, FeCoB thickness t, strip width W, length L, and a C-shaped contact geometry, and they support the asymmetry picture with finite-element simulations of relative electric-field gradients. The paper also reports wafer-scale deposition on oxidized silicon, thermal stability to 400 °C, and compares switching power against prior z-spin switching demonstrations.

Significance. If the mechanism claim survives scrutiny, the result is significant: it offers a sputter-deposited, polycrystalline, CMOS-compatible generating layer for out-of-plane spin current, removing the single-crystal or wedge requirements of most prior field-free schemes, and it demonstrates the highest reported coercivity (28 mT) among field-free z-spin switching devices at claimed record-low power. The manuscript has real strengths: the ST-FMR symmetry analysis (Eqs. (2)–(3)) and extraction of ξDL,z via Eq. (4) are standard and internally consistent; the argument that a homogeneous σ_SH tensor cannot convert a tilted current into a z-polarized/z-flowing spin current is correct; the switching and annealing data are mutually consistent; and the (Ic/W)^2 ρxx comparison metric is a reasonable energy-efficiency measure.

major comments (3)
  1. [Results: 'Enhancing z and y spin generation by alloying' (paragraph following Fig. 1h)] The central inference that alloying tunes the bulk spin Hall conductivity element σ_SH,z follows from ξDL,z^j = Tint σ_SH,z ρxx with Tint ≈ 0.50 taken from references 37 and 47, but Tint is never measured for the PtTi/FeCoB interface. The numbers given in the text are 0.0016 (Pt 8/FeCoB 8) and 0.0119 (PtTi 8/FeCoB 8), a ratio of 7.4; after dividing by the resistivity ratio (100/19 ≈ 5.3), the inferred change in σ_SH,z is only a factor of ≈1.4. A reduction of Tint from 0.50 to about 0.35 on alloying would therefore erase the claimed bulk enhancement, and alloying the interface with 25% Ti plausibly changes interface composition and spin transparency. Since the bulk-tensor tuning is the paper's headline mechanism, the authors should measure Tint for the PtTi/FeCoB interface (for example, through the spin-mixing-conductance or fully transparent-interface methods of references 36 and 47) or provide an independent, bulk-sensitive measurement of σ_SH,z.
  2. [Results: 'Enhancing z spin generation by electric asymmetry engineering' (paragraph beginning 'The strong…] The claim that the strong dependences of the z-spin torque on d, t, W, L, and contact 'unambiguously reveal that the z spin torque is not from any interface effects' is not supported by the presented evidence. Interface spin-swapping of the type reported in reference 33 is generated by gradients of the spin current, and the C-shaped contact geometry that produces the electric asymmetries likewise produces the current/spin-current nonuniformity required for spin swapping; hence an interface mechanism would also exhibit strong dependences on d, t, W, L, and contact placement. The finite-element simulations in Fig. 1h and Fig. 2b compute only relative electric-field gradients and do not include spin-swapping amplitudes, so they cannot discriminate between the two mechanisms. A control experiment is needed—for example, comparing z-torque magnitude for symmetric versus C-shaped contacts on identical films, or inserting an ultrathin spacer to decouple the interface from the bulk—before the bulk σ_SH,z attribution can be considered established.
  3. [Fig. 2a and the geometry-dependence discussion] ξDL,z is plotted without error bars in Fig. 2a, although the geometry trends (increase with d, t, W; decrease with L) are the principal evidence for electric-asymmetry engineering and for the contrast with the Pt control. The authors report uncertainties for ξDL,y^j in Fig. 2c, and similar treatment for ξDL,z is needed so that the significance of the trends, and of the claimed 6-to-7-fold enhancement, can be assessed by the reader.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Paragraph following Fig. 1h] The text states that the resistivity enhancement 'cannot, by itself, explain the more than tenfold enhancement of z spin torque,' but the reported values (0.0119 vs 0.0016) give 7.4x, and even the maximum value of 0.015 at W = 15 μm, L = 10 μm gives 9.4x; the tenfold figure is not supported by the paper's own numbers and should be corrected.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract's 'enhanced by 6 and 3 times' is a slight underestimate for the z-spin channel, which is 7.4x by the paper's own numbers at W = 10 μm, L = 20 μm; reporting the precise ratios would avoid confusion for readers tracing the quoted comparison.
  3. [Fig. 1a caption and 'Enhancing z spin generation by electric asymmetry engineering'] The Fig. 1a caption reads 'injected from sport A' and should read 'spot A'; similarly, 'the emergency of the spin Hall conductivity of z spins' should read 'emergence'.
  4. [Technological impacts / switching demonstration] The width W of the PtTi/Ti/FeCoB Hall-bar used for the switching demonstration is not stated explicitly in the text; since the record-low-power comparison in Fig. 3e uses (Ic/W)^2 ρxx, the width should be given so that the comparison can be reproduced from the paper's own numbers.
  5. [Methods: Finite-element analysis] The FeCoB resistivity (130 μΩ·cm) and contact resistivity (24 μΩ·cm) are fixed inputs 'following our resistivity calibration,' but no calibration data or sensitivity analysis is provided; a brief statement of how the Fig. 1h/Fig. 2b trends depend on these inputs would strengthen confidence in the qualitative agreement.
  6. [Conclusion] The closing claim that the results 'unambiguously establish the Pt75Ti25/FeCoB as the most compelling candidate' overstates what single-device comparisons can establish; more cautious wording is advisable given the mechanism uncertainties noted above.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No demonstrated circularity: the enhanced z-spin torques are measured observables; the interpretation relies on an unverified transparency assumption and on self-cited background, neither of which reduces the result to its inputs.

full rationale

The central quantities ξDL,z^j and ξDL,y^j are extracted directly from ST-FMR spectra through Eqs. (1)-(3), with ξDL,z^j obtained from Eq. (4) using measured amplitudes ADL,z and SDL,y. The reported factor-of-six enhancement in z-spin dampinglike torque is therefore a measured ratio between PtTi/FeCoB and Pt/FeCoB devices, not a quantity produced by fitting the paper's own conclusion. The equation ξDL,z^j = Tint σSH,z ρxx is used interpretively: the authors infer an altered bulk spin Hall conductivity by dividing the measured ξDL,z^j by ρxx and assuming Tint ≈ 0.50 from refs. 37 and 47. That assumption is unmeasured for PtTi and is quantitatively important, but it is not circular, because the measured ξDL,z^j is independent of the claimed σSH,z enhancement and the transparency value is not derived from the target result. The electric-asymmetry framework is adopted from the authors' prior work (ref. 34), and the finite-element simulations and geometry scans in Fig. 2 provide new data consistent with that framework rather than importing the conclusion by citation alone. The claim that geometry dependence 'unambiguously' rules out interface spin-swapping is an overstatement and a robustness weakness, but it is an inference issue, not a definitional equivalence or a fitted-input-as-prediction. Thus no specific circular step can be exhibited from the paper's equations or citations; the modest score reflects self-citation in the interpretive chain and the unverified transparency transfer, not demonstrated circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim relies on prior work for the drift-diffusion model, the ST-FMR decomposition, and the electric-asymmetry mechanism. No new entities are introduced. The assumed spin transparency and the fixed simulation resistivities are inputs from prior calibration, not fitted to the target result.

free parameters (3)
  • Spin transparency Tint = ≈0.50 (assumed)
    Used to convert measured spin torque efficiencies to spin Hall conductivity elements; assumed identical for Pt/FeCoB and PtTi/FeCoB based on refs 37 and 47. If Tint changed with alloying, the attribution to a modified sigma_SH tensor would be affected.
  • FeCoB resistivity in FEA = 130 μΩ cm
    Fixed input from resistivity calibration for finite-element simulation of electric asymmetries; not fitted to the central result.
  • Contact resistivity in FEA = 24 μΩ cm
    Fixed input for finite-element simulation of electric asymmetries; not fitted to the central result.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Drift-diffusion relation xi_DL,y(z)^j = Tint * sigma_SH,y(z) * rho_xx
    Used in Results to attribute torque enhancement to sigma_SH,z; standard in the field, per refs 35 and 46.
  • domain assumption ST-FMR angular dependence equations (2) and (3)
    The decomposition of S and A into y, x, z spin contributions follows ref 34; if the angular forms were incomplete, the extracted ADL,z could be contaminated.
  • domain assumption Electric asymmetry product controls z-spin generation
    The finite-element simulation quantifies the product of relative transverse and perpendicular electric field gradients as the relevant asymmetry; this model is carried over from the authors' previous work in ref 34.
  • standard math Current tilting alone cannot generate z spin current without sigma_SH tensor change
    Symmetry argument in Results: each electric field component Ex, Ey, Ez cannot produce a spin current polarized and flowing along z; this is a group-theoretic statement.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Enhancing z spin generation in trivial spin Hall materials for scalable, energy-efficient, field-free, complete spin-orbit torque switching applications." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GKQ2VSYI

@misc{pith2026250606628,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Enhancing z spin generation in trivial spin Hall materials for scalable, energy-efficient, field-free, complete spin-orbit torque switching applications},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GKQ2VSYI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.06628}
}
read the original abstract

Despite the remarkable efforts in the past two decades, it has remained a major challenge to achieve switching of perpendicularly magnetized spin-orbit torque devices in a scalable, energy-efficient, field-free, integration-friendly, and complete manner. Here, we report giant enhancement of z spin generation in low-resistivity spin Hall metal/FeCoB devices by alloying the spin Hall metal Pt with Ti and by electric asymmetry engineering. The dampinglike spin torques of z spins and y spins are enhanced by 6 and 3 times relative to that of conventional Pt/FeCoB and enable complete, record-low-power, deterministic switching of FeCoB devices with strong perpendicular magnetic anisotropy and high coercivity. The Pt75Ti25/FeCoB heterostructure also exhibits relatively low resistivity, wafer-scale uniform sputter-deposition on silicon oxide, good compatibility with magnetic tunnel junctions, and excellent thermal stability of exceeding 400 C. These results unambiguously establish the Pt75Ti25/FeCoB as the most compelling candidate for solving the bottleneck of scalable, energy-efficient, field-free, integration-friendly, and complete spin-orbit torque switching technologies. This work also provides a universal strategy for developing high-performance generators of z spin current and will stimulate the exploration of exotic spin currents by alloying trivial spin Hall materials.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Zhu, Switching of Perpendicular Magnetization by Spin-Orbit Torque, Adv

    L. Zhu, Switching of Perpendicular Magnetization by Spin-Orbit Torque, Adv. Mater. 35, 2300853 (2023)

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    O. J. Lee, L. Q. Liu, C. F. Pai, Y . Li, H. W. Tseng, P. G. Gowtham, J. P. Park, D. C. Ralph, R. A. Buhrman, Central role of domain wall depinning for perpendicular magnetization switching driven by spin torque from the spin Hall effect, Phys. Rev. B 89, 024418 (2014)

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    G. Yu, P. Upadhyaya, Y . Fan, J. G. Alzate, W. Jiang, K. L. Wong, S. Takei, S. A. Bender, L.-T. Chang, Y . Jiang, M. Lang, J. Tang, Y . Wang, Y . Tserkovnyak, P.K. Amiri, K. L. Wang, Switching of perpendicular magnetization by spin -orbit torques in the absence of external magnetic fields, Nat. Nanotech. 9, 548 (2014)

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    Torrejon, F

    J. Torrejon, F. Garcia-Sanchez, T. Taniguchi, J. Sinha, S. Mitani, J.-V . Kim, M. Hayashi, Current-driven asymmetric magnetization switching in perpendicularly magnetized CoFeB/MgO heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B 91, 214434 (2015)

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    Fukami, C

    S. Fukami, C. Zhang, S. DuttaGupta, A. Kurenkov, H. Ohno, Magnetization switching by spin –orbit torque in an antiferromagnet–ferromagnet bilayer system, Nat. Mater. 15, 535 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Y.-W. Oh, S.C. Baek, Y . M. Kim, H.Y . Lee, K.-D. Lee, C.-G. Yang, E.-S. Park, K.-S. Lee, K.-W. Kim, G. Go, J. -R. Jeong, B. -C. Min, H. -W. Lee, K. -J. Lee, B. -G. Park, Field -free switching of perpendicular magnetization through spin–orbit torque in antiferromagnet/ferromagnet/oxide structures, Nat. Nanotech. 11, 878 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Y.-C. Lau, D. Betto, K. Rode, J. M. D. Coey, P. Stamenov, Spin-orbit torque switching without an external field using interlayer exchange coupling, Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 758 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    K. Cai, M. Yang, H. Ju, S. Wang, Y . Ji, B. Li, K. W. Edmonds, Y . Sheng, B. Zhang, N. Zhang, S. Liu, H. Zheng, Electric field control of deterministic current -induced magnetization switching in a hybrid ferromagnetic/ferroelectric structure, Nat. Mater. 16, 712 (2017)

    work page 2017

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    M. Wang, W. Cai, D. Zhu, Z. Wang, J. Kan, Z. Zhao, K. Cao, Z. Wang, Y . Zhang, T. Zhang, C. Park, J.-P. Wang, A. Fert, W. Zhao, Field -free switching of a perpendicular magnetic tunnel junction through the interplay of spin-orbit and spin-transfer torques. Nat. Electron. 1, 582 (2018)

    2018

  2. [10]

    N. Sato, F. Xue, R. M. White, C. Bi, S. X. Wang, Two-terminal spin-orbit torque magnetoresistive random access memory, Nat. Electron. 1, 508 (2018)

    2018

  3. [11]

    L. Liu, C. Zhou, X. Shu, C. Li, T. Zhao, W. Lin, J. Deng, Q. Xie, S. Chen, J. Zhou, R. Guo, H. Wang, J. Yu, S. Shi, P. Yang, S. Pennycook, A. Manchon, J. Chen, Symmetry -dependent field-free switching of perpendicular magnetization, Nat. Nanotech. 16, 277 (2021)

    2021

  4. [12]

    Q. Liu, L. Zhu, Current-induced perpendicular effective magnetic field in magnetic heterostructures, Appl. Phys. Rev. 9, 041401 (2022)

    2022

  5. [13]

    C. Cao, S. Chen, R. Xiao, Z. Zhu, G. Yu, Y . Wang, X. Qiu, L. Liu, Tieyang Zhao, Ding-Fu Shao, Yang Xu, J. Chen, Q. Zhan, Anomalous spin current anisotropy in a noncollinear antiferromagnet. Nat Commun. 14, 5873 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    Liang, A

    S. Liang, A. Chen, L. Han, H. Bai, C. Chen, L. Huang, M. Ma, F. Pan, X. Zhang, C. Song, Field -Free Perpendicular Magnetic Memory Driven by Out -of-Plane Spin-Orbit Torques, Adv. Funct. Mater. 35, 2417731 (2024). 10

    2024

  7. [15]

    Y . Fan, Q. Wang, W. Wang, D. Wang, Q. Huang, Z. Wang, X. Han, Y . Chen, L. Bai, S. Yan, and Y . Tian, Robust Magnetic-Field-Free Perpendicular Magnetization Switching by Manipulating Spin Polarization Direction in RuO2/[Pt/Co/Pt] Heterojunctions, ACS Nano 18, 26350 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    Zhang, H

    Y . Zhang, H. Xu, K. Jia, G. Lan, Z. Huang, B. He, C. He, Q. Shao, Y . Wang, M. Zhao, T. Ma, J. Dong, C. Guo, C. Cheng, J. Feng, C. Wan, H. Wei, Y . Shi, G. Zhang, X. Han, and G. Yu, Room temperature field- free switching of perpendicular magnetization through spin-orbit torqu...

    2023

  9. [17]

    H. Lyu, Y . Zhao, J. Qi, H. Huang, J. Zhang, G. Yang, Y . Guo, S. Shen, W. Qin, Y . Sun, J. Shen, P. Dou, B. Shao, Y . Zhang, K. Jin, Y . Long, H. Wei, B. Shen, S. Wang, Field-Free Magnetization Switching Driven by Spin–Orbit Torque in L10-FeCrPt Single Layer, Adv. Funct. Mate...

    2022

  10. [18]

    Zheng, Y

    Z. Zheng, Y . Zhang, V . Lopez-Dominguez, L. Sánchez-Tejerina, J. Shi, X. Feng, L. Chen, Z. Wang, Z. Zhang, K. Zhang, B. Hong, Y . Xu, Y . Zhang, M. Carpentieri, A. Fert, G. Finocchio, W. Zhao, P. K. Amiri, Field-free spin-orbit torque-induced switching of per pendicular magne...

    2021

  11. [19]

    L. Liu, C. Zhou, T. Zhao, B. Yao, J. Zhou, X. Shu, S. Chen, S. Shi, S. Xi, D. Lan, W. Lin, Q. Xie, L. Ren, Z. Luo, C. Sun, P. Yang, E. -J. Guo, Z. Dong, A. Manchon, J. Chen, Current-induced self-switching of perpendicular magnetization in CoPt single layer, Nat. Commun. 13, 35...

    2022

  12. [20]

    Y . Cao, Y . Sheng, K. W. Edmonds, Y . Ji, H. Zheng, K. Wang, Deterministic Magnetization Switching Using Lateral Spin–Orbit Torque, Adv. Mater. 32, 1907929 (2020)

    2020

  13. [21]

    Razavi, H

    A. Razavi, H. Wu, Q. Shao, C. Fang, B. Dai, K. Wong, X. Han, G. Yu, K. L. Wang, Deterministic Spin- Orbit Torque Switching by a Light-Metal Insertion, Nano Lett. 20, 3703−3709 (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    MacNeill, G

    D. MacNeill, G. M. Stiehl, M. H. D. Guimaraes, R. A. Buhrman, J. Park, D. C. Ralph, Control of spin – orbit torques through crystal symmetry in WTe2/ferromagnet bilayers, Nat. Phys. 13, 300 (2017)

    2017

  15. [23]

    A. M. Humphries, T. Wang, E. R. J. Edwards, S. R. Allen, J. M. Shaw, H. T. Nembach, J. Q. Xiao, T. J. Silva, X. Fan, Observation of spin-orbit effects with spin rotation symmetry, Nat. Commun. 8, 911 (2017)

    2017

  16. [24]

    S. C. Baek, V . P. Amin, Y . Oh, G. Go, S. Lee, G. Lee, K. Kim, M. D. Stiles, B. Park, K. Lee, Spin currents and spin-orbit torques in ferromagnetic trilayers, Nat. Mater. 17, 509 (2018)

    2018

  17. [25]

    V . P. Amin, J. Zemen, and M. D. Stiles, Interface-Generated Spin Currents, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 136805 (2018)

    2018

  18. [26]

    T. Nan, C. X. Quintela, J. Irwin, G. Gurung, D. F. Shao, J. Gibbons, N. Campbell, K. Song, S. -Y . Choi, L. Guo, R. D. Johnson, P. Manuel, R. V . Chopdekar, I. Hallsteinsen, T. Tybell, P. J. Ryan, J. -W. Kim, Y . Choi, P. G. Radaelli, D. C. Ralph, E. Y . Tsymbal, M. S. Rzchows...

    2020

  19. [27]

    Y . You, H. Bai, X. Feng, X. Fan, L. Han, X. Zhou, Y . Zhou, R. Zhang, T. Chen, F. Pan, C. Song, Cluster magnetic octupole induced out -of-plane spin polarization in antiperovskite antiferromagnet, Nat. Commun. 12, 6524 (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    A. Bose, N. J. Schreiber, R. Jain, D. Shao, H. P. Nair, J. Sun, X. S. Zhang, D. A. Muller, E. Y . Tsymbal , D. G. Schlom , and D. C. Ralph, Tilted spin current generated by the collinear antiferromagnet ruthenium dioxide, Nat. Electron. 5, 267 (2022)

    2022

  21. [29]

    H. Bai, Y . C. Zhang, Y . J. Zhou, P. Chen, C. H. Wan, L. Han, W. X. Zhu, S. X. Liang, Y . C. Su, X. F. Han, F. Pan, C. Song, Efficient Spin -to-Charge Conversion via Altermagn etic Spin Splitting Effect in 11 Antiferromagnet RuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 216701 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    Karube, T

    S. Karube, T. Tanaka, D. Sugawara, N. Kadoguchi, M. Kohda, J. Nitta, Observation of Spin -Splitter Torque in Collinear Antiferromagnetic RuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 137201(2022)

    2022

  23. [31]

    S. Hu, D. Shao, H. Yang, C. Pan, Z. Fu, M. Tang, Y . Yang, W. Fan, S. Zhou, E. Y . Tsymbal, X. Qiu , Efficient perpendicular magnetization switching by a magnetic spin Hall effect in a noncollinear antiferromagnet, Nat. Commun. 13, 4447 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    M. DC, D. Shao, V . D.-H. Hou, P. Quarterman, A. Habiboglu, B. Venuti, M. Miura, B. Kirby, A. Vailionis, C. Bi, X. Li, F. Xue, Y . Huang, Y . Deng, S. Lin, W. Tsai, S. Eley, W. Wang, J. A. Borchers, E. Y . Tsymbal, S. X. Wang, Observation of anti-damping spin–orbit torques gen...

    2023

  25. [33]

    B. K. Hazra, B. Pal, J. Jeon, R. R. Neumann, B. Göbel, B. Grover, H. Deniz, A. Styervoyedov, H. Meyerheim, I. Mertig, S. Yang, S. S. P . Parkin, Generation of out-of-plane polarized spin current by spin swapping, Nat. Commun. 14, 4549 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    Q. Liu, X. Li n, Z. Nie, G. Yu, L. Zhu, Efficient generation of out -of-plane polarized spin current in polycrystalline heavy metal devices with broken electric symmetries, Adv. Mater. 36, 2406552 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    L. Zhu, D. C. Ralph, R. A. Buhrman, Maximizing spin -orbit torque generated by the spin Hall effect of Pt, Appl. Phys. Rev. 8, 031308 (2021)

    2021

  28. [36]

    L. Zhu, D. C. Ralph, R. A. Buhrman, Effective spin -mixing conductance of heavy -metal-ferromagnet interfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 057203 (2019)

    2019

  29. [37]

    Zhu, D.C

    L. Zhu, D.C. Ralph ， Strong variation of spin -orbit torques with relative spin relaxation rates in ferrimagnets, Nat. Commun. 14, 1778 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    L. Zhu, D. C. Ralph, R. A. Buhrman, Highly Efficient Spin-Current Generation by the Spin Hall Effect in Au1−xPtx. Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 031001 (2018)

    2018

  31. [39]

    L. Zhu, L. Zhu, M. L. Sui, D. C. Ralph, and R. A. Buhrman, Variation of the giant intrinsic spin Hall conductivity of Pt with carrier lifetime. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav8025 (2019)

    2019

  32. [40]

    Q. Liu, J. Li, L. Zhu, X. Lin, X. Xie, L. Zhu, Strong Spin-Orbit Torque Induced by the Intrinsic Spin Hall Effect in Cr1−xPtx, Phys. Rev. Appl. 18, 054079 (2022)

    2022

  33. [41]

    X. Lin, J. Li, L. Zhu, X. Xie, Q. Liu, D. Wei, G. Yuan, and L. Zhu, Strong enhancement of spin -orbit torques in ferrimagnetic Ptx(Si3N4)1−x/CoTb bilayers by Si3N4 doping, Phys. Rev. B 106, L140407 (2022)

    2022

  34. [42]

    L. Liu, T. Moriyama, D. C. Ralph, R. A. Buhrman, Spin-torque ferromagnetic resonance induced by the spin Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 036601 (2011)

    2011

  35. [43]

    L. Zhu, X. S. Zhang, D. A. Muller, D. C. Ralph, R. A. Buhrman, Observation of strong bulk damping-like spin-orbit torque in chemically disordered ferromagnetic single layers, Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 2005201 (2020)

    2020

  36. [44]

    Q. Liu, L. Zhu, Absence of Orbital Hall torque in Ta/ferromagnet bilayers, arXiv:2501.10260 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Karimeddiny, J

    S. Karimeddiny, J. A. Mittelstaedt, R. A. Buhrman, D. C. Ralph, Transverse and longitudinal spin-torque ferromagnetic resonance for improved measurement of spin -orbit torque, Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 024024 (2020)

    2020

  38. [46]

    P. M. Haney, H. W. Lee, K. J. Lee, A. Manchon, and M. D. Stiles, Current induced torques and interfacial spin-orbit coupling: Semiclassical modeling. Phys. Rev. B 87, 174411(2013)

    2013

  39. [47]

    L. Zhu, L. Zhu, R. A. Buhrman, Fully spin-transparent magnetic interfaces enabled by insertion of a thin 12 paramagnetic NiO layer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 107204 (2021)

    2021

  40. [48]

    C. Pai, Y. Ou, L. H. Vilela-Leã o, D. C. Ralph, R. A. Buhrman, Dependence of the efficiency of spin Hall torque on the transparency of Pt/ferromagnetic layer interfaces, Phys. Rev. B 92, 064426 (2015). Acknowledgment: This work was supported partly by the National Key Research...

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.