Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 40 references

Lie Algebra Contractions and Interbasis Expansions on Two-Dimensional Hyperboloid IIB. Non-Subgroup Basis

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper constructs, for the first time, orthonormal discrete-spectrum eigenfunctions for the hyperboloid's hyperbolic parabolic system and derives their explicit overlap coefficients with the equidistant basis.

desk verdict The paper does solid special-function work (SCP-HO exponentials, EP-EQ expansions), but its new discrete HP spectrum is underdetermined by an arbitrary offset ς0 and lacks completeness. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.06827 v1 pith:BAVYFZF7 submitted 2025-06-07 math-ph math.MP

G.S. Pogosyan , A. Yakhno This is my paper
classification math-phmath.MP MSC 33C0533C4535J0522E70
keywords Laplace-Beltramiequationtwo-sheetedhyperboloidseparationofvariablesinterbasisexpansionshyperbolicparaboliccoordinatestoroidalfunctionsWilson-RacahpolynomialsLiealgebracontractions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to complete the explicit solution of the Laplace–Beltrami equation on the two-sheeted hyperboloid in all three of its non-subgroup separable coordinate systems: semi-circular parabolic, elliptic parabolic, and hyperbolic parabolic. Its new result is a discrete series of orthonormal eigenfunctions for the hyperbolic parabolic system, written for the first time in closed form as products of toroidal (associated Legendre) functions with a ladder of separation constants $\varsigma_n = \varsigma_0 + 2n$, together with the interbasis expansions that express these functions in the previously known equidistant basis. If the paper is right, the catalogue of separable solutions on the hyperboloid is now fully explicit and normalized, with every non-subgroup basis connected to the subgroup bases by computed overlap coefficients. The paper also takes the large-radius limit of each basis and recovers the familiar separable solutions of the Euclidean plane, making the result a working dictionary between wave problems on a curved space and on flat space.

What carries the argument

The machinery is separation of variables: in each non-subgroup system the Laplace–Beltrami equation splits into two one-dimensional hypergeometric equations with singular potentials (trigonometric Rosen–Morse, Pöschl–Teller, a hyperbolic centrifugal term, and an algebraic term where the separation constants fail to decouple). The hyperbolic parabolic solutions are assembled from toroidal functions, the associated Legendre functions of the second kind $Q^{-i\rho}_{-1/2+\varsigma}(\cosh b)$ and $Q^{-i\rho}_{-1/2+\varsigma}(\cos\theta)$; their connection formulas and endpoint asymptotics at $b=0$, $\theta=0$, $\theta=\pi$ impose square integrability, fix the ladder structure $\varsigma_n = \varsigma_0 + 2n$, and determine the gamma-function normalization constants (252) and (264). The interbasis coefficients are then extracted by analytic continuation and residue evaluation of known integrals: the SCP-to-HO coefficients collapse to the $\rho$-independent exponentials $K^{(1,2)}_{\rho A} = \mp \frac{i}{2\sqrt{\pi}}\frac{e^{\pm i|A|/2s}}{s}$, the EP-to-PS coefficients are unit-argument $_4F_3$ series identified with Wilson–Racah polynomials, and the EP-to-EQ and HP-to-EQ coefficients are $_3F_2$ series with delta-function terms.

What would settle it

Compute numerically the resolution of identity for the discrete HP family at a fixed generic offset, say $\varsigma_0 = 1/2$: truncate the series in (57) and test whether, with the weight $\sin^{-2}\theta + \sinh^{-2}b$ of Eq. (34), it converges to $\delta(b-b')\delta(\theta-\theta')$. The orthogonality proof in Appendix B fixes only the spacing between neighboring $\varsigma$ values; if the truncated series converges to a delta only for special offsets, or to a projector on a subspace, the discrete family is not complete. A simpler check: insert the coefficients (151)–(152) into Parseval's identity for the expansion (139) and see whether it holds for $\varsigma_0 = 1/2$ and $\varsigma_0 = 1$ alike.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the hyperbolic parabolic system on $H^+_2$ possesses a discrete series of orthonormal eigenfunctions, presented here for the first time in explicit closed form: $\Psi^{HP}_{\rho\varsigma_n}(b,\theta) = N^d_{\rho\varsigma_n}\sqrt{\sinh b\,\sin\theta}\,Q^{-i\rho}_{-1/2+\varsigma_n}(\cosh b)\,Q^{-i\rho}_{-1/2+\varsigma_n}(\cos\theta)$ with the normalization (252), where the separation constant runs over the ladder $\varsigma_n = \varsigma_0 + 2n$ with offset $\varsigma_0 \in (0,2]$, together with a continuous-spectrum family obtained by $\varsigma \to i\varsigma$ (Eq. (63)). It further claims that the expansion of these new eigenfunctions in the equidistant basis has the explicit coefficients (151)–(152) (discrete) and (159)–(160) (continuous), finally answering the problem of expanding the hyperbolic parabolic basis that earlier work had flagged as intractable. The same paper obtains normalized eigenfunctions for the semi-circular parabolic and elliptic parabolic systems and computes their overlaps with subgroup bases: exponentials for SCP into the horocyclic basis, Wilson–Racah polynomials for EP into the pseudo-spherical basis, and $_3F_2$ series with delta terms for EP into the equidistant basis. The upshot claimed is a complete, explicitly normalized set of separable eigenfunctions for all three non-subgroup coordinate systems, tied to the subgroup bases by explicit unitary coefficients and contracting, as the radius tends to infinity, to the familiar separable solutions of the Helmholtz equation on the Euclidean plane.

Load-bearing premise

The discrete spectrum of the hyperbolic parabolic system is assumed to have ladder spacing 2 starting from an arbitrary offset between 0 and 2; the orthogonality calculation fixes only the spacing, no boundary condition determines the offset, and completeness for such a choice is not proved.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The hyperbolic parabolic discrete-series eigenfunctions (57) with normalization (252) make explicit, for the first time, the discrete spectrum that earlier work had detected but not solved for the hyperbolic parabolic coordinate system on $H^+_2$.
  • The expansions (151)–(152) and (159)–(160) supply explicit unitary coefficients between the hyperbolic parabolic basis and the equidistant basis, so spectral computations can be translated freely between the two systems.
  • The SCP-to-horocyclic coefficients take the closed form $\mp \frac{i}{2\sqrt{\pi}} e^{\pm i|A|/2s}/s$, independent of the energy label $\rho$, giving the simplest possible connection between two of the separable systems.
  • The EP-to-PS coefficients, expressed through Wilson–Racah polynomials, inherit orthogonality and completeness from known polynomial systems, which is the mechanism by which the paper proves completeness of the EP basis.
  • The contraction results of Section IV give explicit $R\to\infty$ limits of every normalized non-subgroup basis, recovering parabolic, polar, and Cartesian solutions of the Helmholtz equation on the Euclidean plane and showing how the curved-space solutions degenerate.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • I read the free offset $\varsigma_0 \in (0,2]$ as labelling a one-parameter family of quantizations rather than a unique discrete spectrum: the orthogonality calculation fixes only the ladder spacing $2$, and no boundary condition picks a value. On this reading the hyperbolic parabolic system has inequivalent self-adjoint extensions, which matters for any quantum-mechanical application of the new
  • Since the contraction limit sets $\varsigma_n \sim R\sqrt{k_2^2-k_1^2}$, the offset enters only at order $1/R$; the Euclidean plane formulas of Section IV should therefore be insensitive to $\varsigma_0$, and verifying that the phases (207)–(215) do not depend on it is a direct, purely analytic check of the construction's robustness.
  • The paper proves orthonormality for the discrete HP family but not its completeness for a fixed offset; the expansions (151)–(152) would double as a completeness proof if the coefficients were shown to satisfy Parseval's identity, which is not verified in the text. Confirming that identity numerically is the cheapest way to upgrade the result from an orthonormal family to a basis.
  • The $\rho$-independence of the SCP-to-HO coefficients suggests that overlap is fixed by the coordinate geometry alone; a natural extension is to look for an analogous simplification in the HP-to-EQ coefficients (151)–(152), which currently carry explicit $\rho$-dependence through the factor $F^{(\pm)}_{\rho\nu}$.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper, a continuation of the authors' previous work on subgroup-type bases, studies separation of variables for the Laplace-Beltrami equation on the two-sheeted hyperboloid H_2^+ in three non-subgroup coordinate systems: semi-circular parabolic (SCP), elliptic parabolic (EP), and hyperbolic parabolic (HP). For SCP and EP the paper presents normalized eigenfunctions, orthonormality and completeness relations, and interbasis expansions into subgroup bases (equidistant, horocyclic, and pseudo-spherical). The principal new claim is a discrete series of orthonormal HP eigenfunctions, given in Eq. (57) with normalization (252), together with HP-to-EQ interbasis expansions (151)-(152). The paper also derives contractions of the normalized eigenfunctions and some expansion coefficients to the Euclidean plane.

Significance. If the HP discrete-series issue were resolved, the paper would provide explicit, normalized separable eigenfunctions for all three non-subgroup coordinate systems, with interbasis coefficients connecting them to subgroup bases. There are genuine strengths: the SCP-HO overlap coefficients are remarkably simple and ρ-independent (Eq. (82)); the EP-PS coefficients are expressed through Wilson-Racah polynomials; and Appendices A-C contain substantial independent calculations, including a contour-integral derivation of the SCP-HO coefficients. However, the HP discrete spectrum depends on an undetermined offset ς₀, so the central novelty is not uniquely specified. This is a load-bearing weakness rather than a presentation issue.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section II.C.1 and Appendix B, Eq. (249)] The discrete HP spectrum ς_n = ς₀ + 2n with arbitrary ς₀ ∈ (0,2] is declared, not derived. The orthogonality computation in Eqs. (247)-(248) forces only the spacing condition ς₂ - ς₁ = 2m; the sentence 'starting from the minimum positive fixed value ς₀ ∈ (0,2]' introduces the offset without any boundary condition. This matters because the separated equations (33) are singular at b = 0 and at θ = 0, π, and the asymptotics (51), (55), (56) show that both Frobenius branches are square-integrable at each singular endpoint. The square-integrability condition (42) at b → ∞ only forces ς > 0 and fixes the ratio C(-ρ,ς)/C(ρ,ς), not the value of ς. Consequently the eigenfunctions (57), the normalization (252), and the interbasis coefficients (151)-(152) all depend on an undetermined self-adjoint-extension parameter. The authors should either impose a boundary condition or a self-adjointness/completeness argument that fixes ς₀, or explicitly present the result as a one-parameter family of orthonormal bases and qualify the claim that the discrete series is 'presented for the first time'.
  2. [Section III.E.1, Eq. (139)] The interbasis expansion (139) presupposes completeness of the HP discrete basis, but no completeness proof is supplied for the HP system. This is in contrast with the SCP and EP bases, for which completeness is stated in Eqs. (15) and (28). Without a Parseval identity, the coefficient formulas (151)-(152) are not justified as true interbasis expansions. Moreover, if a completeness proof were supplied, it might select a particular value of ς₀, which would also resolve the ambiguity raised above. The manuscript should either prove completeness for the HP eigenfunctions with specified boundary conditions or cite a theorem that covers the relevant self-adjoint realization.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Section IV.D] There are typographical errors such as 'semi-sircular' in the abstract and 'continuos' in Section IV.D; these should be corrected.
  2. [Eq. (57) and Eq. (252)] The typesetting of Eq. (57) leaves it ambiguous whether the two Gamma functions appear in the numerator or in the denominator; comparison with Eq. (252) resolves the intended normalization, but Eq. (57) should be typeset to match (252) explicitly.
  3. [Eq. (34)] The notation ilde{δ}_{ςς'} is introduced with a function f(ς) that is not defined until later; the Kronecker/Dirac distinction should be explained where the normalization condition is first stated.
  4. [Section III.D and Eq. (131)] The use of the formal identity δ±(z) in Eq. (131) and the resulting delta-function terms in the EP-EQ coefficients is standard in physics but should be accompanied by a sentence specifying the distributional interpretation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation chain: the interbasis coefficients are computed by independent integrals and special-function identities, not fitted or defined by the target expansions. The arbitrary HP offset is an underdetermination gap, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper derives the new interbasis coefficients by direct calculation rather than by construction. The SCP-HO coefficients K^{(1,2)}_{ρA} are obtained in Appendix C by contour integration of (81) and reduce to the closed form (82), independent of ρ; orthogonality relations (83)-(84) verify them. The EP-PS coefficients (94)-(95) are identified with Wilson-Racah polynomials and checked via (101) and (113). The EP-EQ coefficients are computed from hypergeometric integral representations (117)-(138). The HP-EQ coefficients (151)-(152) are derived from Legendre-function integrals (146)-(150). None of these steps fits a parameter to the claimed result or defines an expansion coefficient as its own overlap integral. The paper does rely on the authors' prior Ref. 1 for the subgroup bases and Ref. 6 for the SCP basis, but those are standard, explicit, independently checkable functions, and the new HP discrete series is not imported from those citations. The most notable weakness is that the discrete HP spectrum is fixed only up to an arbitrary offset: Eq. (249) states 'starting from the minimum positive fixed value ς0 ∈ (0,2]', with no boundary condition or self-adjointness argument selecting ς0, and no completeness proof is supplied for the HP family. That is a mathematical gap, not a circularity: the orthogonality calculation (247)-(248) does not presuppose (151)-(152), and the coefficients are well-defined for any admitted ςn. Hence the paper's central derivations are self-contained and the circularity score is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim relies on standard special-function mathematics plus one undetermined parameter (ς_0) that plays the role of a self-adjoint extension. There are no new particles, forces, or dimensions.

free parameters (1)
  • ς_0 (discrete HP spectrum offset) = in (0,2], chosen by hand
    The discrete spectrum is defined as ς_n = ς_0 + 2n with ς_0 in (0,2] (Eq. 249). This offset is not determined by the differential equation or by boundary conditions; it selects a self-adjoint extension of the singular Sturm-Liouville problem, and the eigenfunctions and expansions depend on it.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Special function identities from Bateman-Erdélyi, Prudnikov, Magnus, and Koekoek are used without proof throughout.
    The derivations rely on numerous hypergeometric, Bessel, and Legendre function transformations, e.g., Eqs. (38), (121)-(122), (150). These are standard background results.
  • domain assumption The Hamiltonian is the Laplace-Beltrami operator on the upper sheet of H+2, and the eigenvalue problem is Eq. (3).
    The physical setup follows Ref. 1 and the separation-of-variables classification of Ref. 2.
  • domain assumption Separation of variables in the three non-subgroup coordinate systems is valid and yields two one-dimensional equations with singular potentials.
    The separated equations (6), (19), (32)-(33) are taken as the starting point; the 'non-separation' of separation constants is a property of these coordinates.
  • ad hoc to paper The discrete HP spectrum is ς_n = ς_0 + 2n for an arbitrary ς_0 in (0,2].
    Imposed in Eq. (249) so that eigenfunctions with different indices are orthogonal; no physical boundary condition fixes ς_0.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Lie Algebra Contractions and Interbasis Expansions on Two-Dimensional Hyperboloid IIB. Non-Subgroup Basis." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BAVYFZF7

@misc{pith2026250606827,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Lie Algebra Contractions and Interbasis Expansions on Two-Dimensional Hyperboloid IIB. Non-Subgroup Basis},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BAVYFZF7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.06827}
}
read the original abstract

The paper describes solutions of the Laplace-Beltrami equation on two-dimensional two-sheeted hyperboloid for three non-subgroup coordinate systems: semi-sircular parabolic, elliptic parabolic and hyperbolic parabolic. The coefficients of interbasis expansions of solutions in the specified coordinate systems through some subgroup bases are calculated. A contraction procedure for all normalized eigenfunctions in three non-subgroup coordinate systems from the hyperboloid to the Euclidean plane is realized.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.06827 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Graphics of the SCP wave function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Graphics of potentials in separated equations for the EP system for the values [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Graphics of EP wave functions for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Graphics of HP wave functions for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Graphics of HP wave functions for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Lie Algebra Contractions and Interbasis Expansions on Two-Dimensional Hyperboloid IIA. Subgroup Basis

    author author G. Pogosyan \ and\ author A. Yakhno ,\ title title Lie algebra contractions and interbasis expansions on two-dimensional hyperboloid iia. subgroup basis. \ 10.48550/arXiv.2504.05514 journal journal ArXiV \ ( year 2025 a ),\ 10.48550/arXiv.2504.05514 NoStop

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.05514

  2. [2]

    author author M. Olevski i ,\ title title Three orthogonal systems in spaces of constant curvature in which the equation _2u+ u=0 allows the complete separation of variables , \ @noop journal journal Math. Sb. \ volume 27 ,\ pages 379--426 ( year 1950 ) NoStop

    work page 1950

  3. [3]

    Kalnins \ and\ author W

    author author E. Kalnins \ and\ author W. Miller Jr. ,\ title title Lie theory and separation of variables. 4. the group so(2,1) and so(3) , \ @noop journal journal J. Math. Phys. \ volume 15 ,\ pages 1263--1274 ( year 1974 ) NoStop

    work page 1974

  4. [4]

    Grosche ,\ title title Path integration and separation of variables in spaces of constant curvature in two and three dimensions , \ @noop journal journal Fortschr

    author author C. Grosche ,\ title title Path integration and separation of variables in spaces of constant curvature in two and three dimensions , \ @noop journal journal Fortschr. Phys. \ volume 42 ,\ pages 509--584 ( year 1994 ) NoStop

    work page 1994

  5. [5]

    Grosche ,\ @noop title Path Integrals, Hyperbolic Space, and Selberg Trace Formulas \ ( publisher World Scientific ,\ address Singapore ,\ year 1996 ) NoStop

    author author C. Grosche ,\ @noop title Path Integrals, Hyperbolic Space, and Selberg Trace Formulas \ ( publisher World Scientific ,\ address Singapore ,\ year 1996 ) NoStop

    work page 1996

  6. [6]

    Pogosyan \ and\ author A

    author author G. Pogosyan \ and\ author A. Yakhno ,\ title title Semi-circular parabolic system on two-dimensional hyperboloid , \ @noop journal journal Physics of Particles and Nuclei \ volume 55 ,\ pages 667--671 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Bateman \ and\ author A

    author author H. Bateman \ and\ author A. Erd \'e lyi ,\ @noop title Higher Transcendental Functions ,\ Vol. volume 2 \ ( publisher Mc Graw-Hill ,\ address New York ,\ year 1952 ) NoStop

    work page 1952

  8. [8]

    Bateman \ and\ author A

    author author H. Bateman \ and\ author A. Erd \'e lyi ,\ @noop title Higher Transcendental Functions ,\ Vol. volume 1 \ ( publisher Mc Graw-Hill ,\ address New York ,\ year 1953 ) NoStop

    work page 1953

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    Pogosyan \ and\ author A

    author author G. Pogosyan \ and\ author A. Yakhno ,\ title title Reviewing the helmholtz equation on euclidean plane and interbasis expansions , \ 10.48550/arXiv.2504.01971 journal journal ArXiV \ ( year 2025 b ),\ 10.48550/arXiv.2504.01971 NoStop

    2025 doi arXiv

  2. [10]

    Prudnikov , author Y

    author author A. Prudnikov , author Y. Brychkov , \ and\ author O. Marichev ,\ @noop title Integrals and Series. Special Functions ,\ Vol. volume 2 \ ( publisher Gordon and Breach Sci. Publ. ,\ address New York ,\ year 1990 ) NoStop

    1990

  3. [11]

    Wilson ,\ title title Some hypergeometric orthogonal polynomials , \ @noop journal journal SIAM J

    author author J. Wilson ,\ title title Some hypergeometric orthogonal polynomials , \ @noop journal journal SIAM J. Math. Anal. \ volume 11 ,\ pages 690 ( year 1980 ) NoStop

    1980

  4. [12]

    Koekoek , author P

    author author R. Koekoek , author P. Lesky , \ and\ author R. Swarttouw ,\ @noop title Hypergeometric Orthogonal Polynomials and Their q-Analogues ,\ edition 1st \ ed.,\ 185 Springer Monographs in Mathematics\ ( publisher Springer-Verlag ,\ address Berlin ,\ year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010

  5. [13]

    author author T. Koornwinder ,\ title title Special orthogonal polynomial systems mapped onto each other by the fourier-jacobi transform , \ in\ @noop booktitle Polyn \^o mes Orthogonaux et Applications ,\ series Lecture Notes in Mathematics , Vol.\ volume 1171 ,\ editor edite...

    1985

  6. [14]

    @citealpnum KAL-MIL1

    note The connection between the EP and PS basis is presented as an overlap integral in Ref. @citealpnum KAL-MIL1 . However, the expression obtained in that paper differs from our result for E ^ m( ) _ due to a significant difference in the definition of the EP wave function. Stop

  7. [15]

    Madelung ,\ title Die mathematischen hilfsmittel des physikers , \ \ ( publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg ,\ year 1957 )\ Chap.\ chapter Zahlen, Funktionen und Operatoren NoStop

    author author E. Madelung ,\ title Die mathematischen hilfsmittel des physikers , \ \ ( publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg ,\ year 1957 )\ Chap.\ chapter Zahlen, Funktionen und Operatoren NoStop

    1957

  8. [16]

    Pogosyan \ and\ author A

    author author G. Pogosyan \ and\ author A. Yakhno ,\ title title Separations of variables and analytic contractions on two-dimensional hyperboloids , \ @noop journal journal Physics of Particles and Nuclei \ volume 50 ,\ pages 87--140 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019

  9. [17]

    Magnus , author F

    author author W. Magnus , author F. Oberhettinger , \ and\ author R. Soni ,\ @noop title Formulas and Theorems for the Special Functions of Mathematical Physics \ ( publisher Springer-Verlag ,\ year 1966 ) NoStop

    1966

  10. [18]

    and Yakhno, A

    Pogosyan, G.S. and Yakhno, A. Separations of variables and analytic contractions on two-dimensional hyperboloids. IIA. Basis functions

  11. [19]

    and Yakhno, A

    Pogosyan, G.S. and Yakhno, A. Separations of Variables and Analytic Contractions on Two-Dimensional Hyperboloids . Physics of Particles and Nuclei, 50(2) , 87-140, 2019

    2019

  12. [20]

    Separation of Variables and Contractions on Two-Dimensional Hyperboloid

    E.Kalnins, G.S.Pogosyan and A.Yakhno. Separation of Variables and Contractions on Two-Dimensional Hyperboloid . SIGMA, 8(105) , 2012

    2012

  13. [21]

    Bateman and A

    H. Bateman and A. Erd \'e lyi Higher Transcendental Functions V.1 (New York Toronto London Mc Graw-Hill Book Company, Inc., 1953)

    1953

  14. [22]

    Bateman and A

    H. Bateman and A. Erd \'e lyi Higher Transcendental Functions V.2 (New York Toronto London Mc Graw-Hill Book Company, Inc., 1953)

    1953

  15. [23]

    Whittaker and G.N

    E.T. Whittaker and G.N. Watson,

  16. [24]

    Table of Integrals, Series and Products

    Rijik...... Table of Integrals, Series and Products . Academic Press, New York, 1980

    1980

  17. [25]

    Prudnikov, Yu.A

    A.P. Prudnikov, Yu.A. Brychkov and O.I. Marichev Integrals and Series, Vol. 2, Special Functions (Gordon and Breach Sci. Publ., New York, 1990)

    1990

  18. [26]

    Prudnikov, Yu.A

    A.P. Prudnikov, Yu.A. Brychkov and O.I. Marichev Integrals and Series, Vol. 3, More Special Functions (Gordon and Breach Sci. Publ., New York, 1990)

    1990

  19. [27]

    Contractions of Lie algebra and separation of variables , J

    A.A.Izmest'ev, G.S.Pogosyan, A.N.Sissakian, P.Winternitz. Contractions of Lie algebra and separation of variables , J. Phys. A29 , 5949-5962, 1996

    1996

  20. [28]

    Contractions of Lie algebra and separation of variables

    A.A.Izmest'ev, G.S.Pogosyan, A.N.Sissakian, P.Winternitz. Contractions of Lie algebra and separation of variables. Two-dimensional hyperboloid . Int. J. Modern Phys. A12 , 53-61, 1997

    1997

  21. [29]

    Separation of variables and subgroup bases on n-dimensional hyperboloid , J.Math.Phys

    G.S.Pogosyan and P.Winternitz. Separation of variables and subgroup bases on n-dimensional hyperboloid , J.Math.Phys. 43 (6), 3387-3410, 2002

    2002

  22. [30]

    and G.S.Pogosyan

    E.G.Kalnins, W.Miller Jr. and G.S.Pogosyan. Contractions of Lie algebras: Applications to special functions and separation of variables . J.Phys. A32 , 4709-4732, 1999

    1999

  23. [31]

    Lie theory and separation of variables

    E.G.Kalnins and W.Miller Jr. Lie theory and separation of variables. 4. The group SO(2,1) and SO(3) . J. Math. Phys., 15 1263-1274, 1974

    1974

  24. [32]

    Sov.J.Nucl.Phys

    Winternitz, P., Lukach, I., Smorodinsky, Ya.A.: Quantum Numbers in the Little Group of the Poincar\'e Group. Sov.J.Nucl.Phys. \ 7 (1968) 139--145

    1968

  25. [33]

    W.Miller Jr., Symmetry and Separation of Variables

  26. [34]

    E.G.Kalnins, On the Separation of Variables for the

  27. [35]

    C. Grosche. Path Integration and Separation of Variables in Spaces of Constant Curvature in Two and Three Dimensions . Fortschr. Phys. 42 (1994) 509--584

    1994

  28. [36]

    Path Integrals, Hyperbolic Space, and Selberg Trace Formulas

    C.Grosche. Path Integrals, Hyperbolic Space, and Selberg Trace Formulas . World Scientific, Singapore, 1996

    1996

  29. [37]

    M.N.Olevski i , Triorthogonal Systems in Spaces of Constant Curvature in which the Equation _2u+ u=0 Allows the Complete Separation of Variables. Math.Sb. \ 27 (1950) 379--426, (in Russian)

    1950

  30. [38]

    Olver, Asymptotics and Special Functions , Academic Press, 1974

    F.W.J. Olver, Asymptotics and Special Functions , Academic Press, 1974

    1974

  31. [39]

    Lebedev N.N., Dokladi AN SSSR, 52 , (1946) 655-658 (in russian)

    1946

  32. [40]

    Koekoek et al., Hypergeometric Orthogonal Polynomials and Their q-Analogues , 185 Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2010

    R. Koekoek et al., Hypergeometric Orthogonal Polynomials and Their q-Analogues , 185 Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2010

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.