Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 36 references

In This Environment, As That Speaker: A Text-Driven Framework for Multi-Attribute Speech Conversion

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read TES-VC claims to be the first voice conversion framework that lets text prompts independently control both speaker timbre and environmental acoustics without requiring paired text-speech data.

desk verdict A plausible text-driven VC system for simultaneous timbre and environment control, but the 'independent control' claim needs a direct orthogonal experiment before it's sold as settled. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.07036 v2 pith:TKWGI2KI submitted 2025-06-08 cs.SD eess.AS

Jiawei Jin , Zhihan Yang , Yixuan Zhou , Zhiyong Wu This is my paper
classification cs.SDeess.AS
keywords voiceconversiontext-drivenspeechsynthesistimbrecontrolenvironmentalacousticslatentdiffusionretrieval-basedsyntheticaudiodatadisentangledrepresentation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that voice conversion can be controlled by two separate text prompts—one describing the target speaker's timbre, the other the acoustic environment—without needing paired text-speech examples for either attribute. The authors argue this is the first framework to do both at once, and that the two controls do not interfere. Their recipe is to train a latent-diffusion model on synthetic mixtures built as clean speech convolved with a room impulse response plus additive non-speech audio, so that timbre, environment, and content are separable by construction. A retrieval-based module then turns abstract text descriptions into concrete speaker embeddings at inference time. If the claims hold, text alone could drive applications like dubbing a character into a cathedral or a crowded cafe while preserving the original words.

What carries the argument

The argument rests on three pieces of machinery. First, a synthetic data model that writes a recorded scene as $y_{\text{real}} = y_{\text{clean}} * \text{RIR} + y_{\text{audio}}$, so that clean speech, room impulse response, and non-speech events can be varied independently during training. Second, a latent diffusion backbone that denoises a corrupted speech latent while receiving three disentangled conditions—content tokens, speaker embeddings, and environmental embeddings—with dual classifier-free guidance to balance the two text controls at inference. Third, the Retrieval-Based Timbre Control (RBTC) module, which trains a contrastive adapter to strip speaker-irrelevant information from audio-text alignment embeddings and then retrieves the closest matching speaker embedding from a knowledge base, making abstract descriptions like 'deep' or 'hoarse' usable without explicit labels.

What would settle it

Take 100 real clips of a speaker moving through a reverberant room while a non-speech event occurs, convert them with the published model using text prompts for that speaker and room, and measure speaker similarity and WER; if these metrics are much worse than those reported on synthetic test clips, the additive RIR-plus-events training assumption is the failing premise.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper claims that TES-VC is the first voice conversion framework able to manipulate both non-vocal environmental sounds and speaker timbre from text prompts without requiring text-speech paired data. It reports that the model generates audio that matches the described timbre and environment, retains the source linguistic content, and lets the two attribute controls act independently. The discovery is that this decoupling can be achieved by generating training data synthetically rather than by trying to untangle real recordings, and by conditioning a diffusion backbone on three separate streams: content tokens from the source speech, speaker embeddings from the target description, and environmental embeddings from the target scene.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that real-world speech can be modeled as clean speech convolved with a room impulse response plus additive non-speech audio, so a model trained only on such synthetic mixtures transfers to real recordings and keeps timbre and environment controls independent.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Text prompts can independently set timbre and acoustic environment in a single generated utterance, so a user can ask for 'a hoarse old man in a rainy street' without losing the source words.
  • No paired text-speech data is needed for the environment or timbre controls, which widens the set of speakers and scenes the method can address.
  • Training on synthetic mixtures is enough to produce audio judged as realistic, suggesting the additive RIR-plus-events model captures much of what listeners perceive.
  • Removing the contrastive adapter degrades timbre control, so speaker identity in this design lives in the adapted embedding space rather than in the raw audio-text alignment.
  • Because the diffusion conditions are separate streams, content retention survives heavy environmental conditioning, keeping WER close to a standard voice conversion baseline.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the decoupling comes from synthetic mixing, the same recipe should transfer to other entangled attributes like emotion, speaking rate, or recording-device coloration, which the paper does not test.
  • The retrieval-based design means timbre control is limited to speakers represented in the knowledge base; a prompt for an out-of-base voice will snap to the nearest stored embedding, so expanding the base should enlarge the achievable timbre vocabulary.
  • If the synthetic scene model transfers to real recordings, the training pipeline could double as a data-augmentation engine for robust speech processing, generating arbitrary speaker-and-room combinations from a clean corpus.
  • A direct extension would test controllability under moving speakers or moving sound sources, where the fixed convolution-plus-additive assumption is only approximate.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper proposes TES-VC, a text-driven voice conversion framework that aims to control both target speaker timbre and environmental acoustics from natural-language prompts while preserving the source utterance's linguistic content. The system uses a latent diffusion U-Net conditioned on Whisper content tokens, x-vector speaker embeddings, and CLAP environmental embeddings; at inference the environment and timbre conditions are derived from separate text prompts. Training uses synthetic mixtures of clean speech convolved with RIRs plus environmental audio to encourage decoupling, and a Retrieval-Based Timbre Control (RBTC) module with a CLAP-timbre adapter and knowledge base maps text descriptions to speaker embeddings without paired text-speech data. Experiments include subjective MOS (S-MOS/E-MOS/R-MOS), age/gender accuracy, WER/CER versus FreeVC, CLAP/KL versus VoiceLDM, an adapter ablation, and PCA visualization. The paper claims to be the first voice conversion framework with text-guided manipulation of both non-vocal environmental sounds and speaker timbre without text-speech paired data, and claims mutually orthogonal control of the two attributes.

Significance. If the claimed decoupling and controllability held, TES-VC would be a practically useful contribution to text-driven voice conversion, with clear applications in dubbing and immersive media. The manuscript has real strengths: the diffusion objective (Eq. 1) and the contrastive loss (Eq. 3) are standard and clearly specified; the RBTC retrieval idea is simple and reasonably motivated; the evaluation includes human listening (S-MOS/E-MOS/R-MOS), a content-preservation comparison with FreeVC, and an ablation of the timbre adapter; and the authors point to a public demo. The central claim, however, is stronger than the evidence: the paper does not directly demonstrate that timbre and environment controls are mutually orthogonal, and the main controllability baseline is a text-to-speech system rather than a voice conversion system. These gaps are fixable with additional experiments, so the contribution is potentially sound but needs revision.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.2, Eq. (1)] The environmental embedding c_env is computed by running CLAP on the full synthetic mixture y_clean * RIR + y_audio, so it is not an environment-only feature: it includes the filtered target speech, whose spectral characteristics carry speaker and content information. Equation (1) contains no orthogonality or invariance penalty that would prevent c_env from encoding such information, and Section 2.4 itself states that CLAP embeddings entangle speaker characteristics with environmental and other acoustic features. Consequently, the claimed mutual orthogonality of timbre and environment control is not guaranteed by the architecture, and the paper provides no experiment that varies one attribute while holding the other fixed and reports both S-MOS and E-MOS. To support the central claim, the authors should add a decoupling test (e.g., the same speaker prompt paired with several environment prompts, and vice versa, with speaker-embedding distance and environment-score measurements) and either add an invariance objective to Eq. (1) or empirically demonstrate that c_env carries no speaker identity information.
  2. [Table 1] The primary subjective comparison is against VoiceLDM, a text-to-speech system that receives ground-truth transcripts as content prompts, rather than a voice conversion baseline. This confounds task difficulty with method quality and does not support the claim of 'superior controllability' for voice conversion specifically. The authors should benchmark against at least one text-driven VC system (e.g., PromptVC) or a voice-conversion adaptation of VoiceLDM under matched conditions (same source speech, same text prompts) before drawing conclusions about VC controllability.
  3. [Section 3.3.2] Content preservation is only measured with the environmental control set to 'clean speech', which does not test the system's actual use case where a non-trivial environment prompt is active. WER and CER should also be reported with environmental prompts such as 'cafe' or 'traffic', and on samples that actually contain environmental audio, to verify that source content is preserved under environmental conditioning. The test protocol should also state whether the objective content-preservation test uses synthetic mixtures or real recordings.
  4. [Section 2.2, Section 3.3] Training and, apparently, the evaluation rely exclusively on synthetic data generated by the additive model y_real = y_clean * RIR + y_audio, yet the motivating applications (film dubbing, AR/VR) involve real recordings whose vocal-environment coupling may not be additive. No evaluation on real field recordings or real conversational audio with matched environmental descriptions is reported, so the external-validity claim that the controls transfer to real-world audio is unsupported; a small real-recording test set or a clear statement of this limitation is needed.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] There is a typo in the demo link: 'avaliable' should be 'available', and the URL spacing should be corrected.
  2. [Section 2.2] The notation y_real = y_clean * RIR + y_audio should state explicitly that '*' denotes convolution, and the augmentation description should clarify whether RIR convolution and environmental sound mixing are mutually exclusive or can be applied together given that each has 0.5 probability.
  3. [Section 2.3, Eq. (2)] The dual classifier-free guidance is clear in form, but the training-time null-condition dropout rates for c_env and c_speech should be reported, since they are free parameters that affect the guidance behavior.
  4. [Table 2] The VoiceLDM row entries are misaligned ('− −1.736 0.176'); the table needs proper column separators and a footnote explaining why WER/CER are not applicable for that system.
  5. [Section 3.3.1] The subjective evaluation should report the number of samples per condition and the inter-annotator agreement or variance for the MOS ratings, not only the 95% confidence intervals for the mean.
  6. [Related Work] The distinction from PromptVC should be sharpened, since PromptVC already uses a latent diffusion model with text-driven multi-attribute control; the specific new contribution here is environment control plus the retrieval-based timbre mapping, and the text should say so explicitly.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Minor evaluation-loop circularity in the CLAP score; central claims otherwise rest on independent human MOS and content metrics.

  1. other [Section 3.3.2 (Objective Evaluation, Table 2)]
    "To assess environmental sound generation capability, we disabled content inputs of both VoiceLDM and our method, retaining only environmental text prompts. Tests on the AC-filter test set utilized the CLAP score and Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence as metrics."

    The environmental conditioning c_env is a CLAP embedding of the text prompt (Section 2.1: 'environmental features c_env from text prompts text_env'; Section 2.2: 'we employ CLAP to encode synthetic audio to obtain an environmental embedding c_env'). The reported CLAP score is computed with the same pretrained CLAP model between the generated audio and the same environmental text prompt. Thus the metric is a self-consistency check in the embedding space used for conditioning rather than an independent measurement of environmental fidelity. This is a mild evaluation-loop circularity, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, and the paper additionally reports human E-MOS, which provides independent support.

full rationale

This is an empirical systems paper with no claimed formal derivation or first-principles result, so most circularity patterns do not apply: there is no self-citation chain, no imported uniqueness theorem, no ansatz smuggled in via citation, and no known result renamed as new. The central claim that TES-VC separately controls timbre and environment is supported by human MOS judgments (S-MOS, E-MOS, R-MOS) and by external content metrics (WER/CER via Whisper), both of which are independent of the model's conditioning features. The one non-independent element is the objective CLAP score: the model conditions on CLAP embeddings and is then evaluated with the same CLAP model, making that metric a closed-loop similarity check rather than an external ground truth. Because the paper's main conclusion does not rest on this metric alone, the circularity is minor. A separate correctness concern, flagged here explicitly, is the paper's own admission in Section 2.4 that 'CLAP's event-level semantic representations inherently entangle fine-grained speaker characteristics with environmental and other acoustic features in its embedding space.' Since c_env is a CLAP embedding of the synthetic mixture, this implies c_env may carry source-speaker information during training; that is a validity threat to the decoupling claim, but it is not a circular reduction, because the paper does not derive independent control from that definition and the human evaluation provides external evidence.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical or metaphysical entities such as particles, forces, or dimensions are postulated. The Timbre Knowledge Base and RBTC adapter are engineered artifacts, not invented entities in the sense used here. The main external dependencies are pretrained models (CLAP, Whisper, x-vector encoder) and the synthetic data generation pipeline.

free parameters (3)
  • Classifier-free guidance scales omega_env and omega_speech = not reported
    Used in Equation (2) to balance environment and speech conditioning at inference; values are hand-chosen and not reported, affecting controllability and naturalness.
  • Contrastive margin alpha = not reported
    Used in Equation (3) to separate positive and negative speaker samples during CLAP-timbre adapter training; chosen by hand and not reported.
  • Data augmentation probabilities = RIR convolution 0.5, environment mixing 0.5, silent speech 0.2
    Randomized probabilities in the synthetic data construction pipeline; chosen by hand and influence how strongly the model decouples attributes.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Real-world speech can be modeled as y_real = y_clean * RIR + y_audio for training decoupled features.
    Section 2.2; the entire synthetic training scheme assumes this additive decomposition captures real vocal-environment coupling well enough to transfer.
  • domain assumption Whisper speech tokens encode content without speaker identity, and x-vector embeddings encode speaker identity without content.
    Sections 2.2 and 2.3; disentangled conditioning is assumed from the pretrained encoders and is not measured directly.
  • domain assumption CLAP embeddings contain sufficient timbre information after adaptation, and CLAP's cross-modal alignment maps text speaker descriptions to that space.
    Section 2.4; the RBTC module depends on this assumption, with PCA clustering as supporting evidence but no direct text-to-retrieval accuracy numbers.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of In This Environment, As That Speaker: A Text-Driven Framework for Multi-Attribute Speech Conversion." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TKWGI2KI

@misc{pith2026250607036,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: In This Environment, As That Speaker: A Text-Driven Framework for Multi-Attribute Speech Conversion},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TKWGI2KI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.07036}
}
read the original abstract

We propose TES-VC (Text-driven Environment and Speaker controllable Voice Conversion), a text-driven voice conversion framework with independent control of speaker timbre and environmental acoustics. TES-VC processes simultaneous text inputs for target voice and environment, accurately generating speech matching described timbre/environment while preserving source content. Trained on synthetic data with decoupled vocal/environment features via latent diffusion modeling, our method eliminates interference between attributes. The Retrieval-Based Timbre Control (RBTC) module enables precise manipulation using abstract descriptions without paired data. Experiments confirm TES-VC effectively generates contextually appropriate speech in both timbre and environment with high content retention and superior controllability which demonstrates its potential for widespread applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.07036 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The details of the architecture training stages and inference stages of our proposed method. Subfigure (a) is the architecture and the training stage of the diffusion backbone of TES-VC. Subfigure (b) is the inference stage of the proposed TES-VC. Subfigure (c) is the training stage for the proposed CLAP-Timbre Adapter. Subfigure (d) is the details of the proposed RBTC module. The flame icon represents the portion t… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The visualization analysis via PCA. Subfigure (a) shows the distribution of original CLAP embeddings. Subfig￾ure (b) shows the distribution of the optimized embeddings. The number in labels refers to the speaker IDs in Librispeech dataset [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    In This Environment, As That Speaker: A Text-Driven Framework for Multi-Attribute Speech Conversion

    Introduction V oice Conversion (VC), which modifies speaker characteristics while preserving linguistic content, is undergoing a paradigm shift driven by advanced digital content needs. Emerging appli- cations are increasingly demanding simultaneous control over both vocal attributes and environmental acoustics, such as film dubbing [1, 2], immersive AR/V...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    System Overview The proposed TES-VC model is trained on purely acoustic data (Figure 1(a)), and leverages text-guided control during infer- ence (Figure 1(b))

    Proposed Method 2.1. System Overview The proposed TES-VC model is trained on purely acoustic data (Figure 1(a)), and leverages text-guided control during infer- ence (Figure 1(b)). As depicted in Figure 1(b), our model con- sists of a diffusion backbone and a series of feature extraction modules. The diffusion backbone generates transformed audio by proce...

    work page

  3. [3]

    w/o CLAP-timbre adapter

    Experiments 3.1. Dataset To systematically decouple environmental, content, and timbral features while ensuring realistic audio synthesis, we implement the dynamic data construction strategy described in Section 2.2. Our training corpus comprises three components: (1) speech data from the LibriTTS-R train-clean-360 subset [27]; (2) en- vironmental audio f...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Our systematic data con- struction methodology facilitates disentangled learning of con- tent preservation, environmental acoustics, and speaker char- acteristics

    Conclusion This paper presents TES-VC, a novel voice conversion frame- work enabling text-driven independent control over speaker timbre and acoustic environments. Our systematic data con- struction methodology facilitates disentangled learning of con- tent preservation, environmental acoustics, and speaker char- acteristics. The proposed Retrieval-Based ...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Acknowledgements This work is supported by National Natural Science Founda- tion of China (62076144), National Social Science Foundation of China (13&ZD189) and Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (JCYJ20220818101014030)

    work page

  6. [6]

    VQVC+: One-Shot Voice Conversion by Vector Quantization and U-Net architecture

    D.-Y . Wu, Y .-H. Chen, and H.-Y . Lee, “Vqvc+: One-shot voice conversion by vector quantization and u-net architecture,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.04154, 2020

    work page Pith review arXiv 2006

  7. [7]

    From speaker to dubber: movie dubbing with prosody and duration consistency learning,

    Z. Zhang, L. Li, G. Cong, H. Yin, Y . Gao, C. Yan, A. v. d. Hengel, and Y . Qi, “From speaker to dubber: movie dubbing with prosody and duration consistency learning,” inProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 2024, pp. 7523– 7532

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Diffdub: Person- generic visual dubbing using inpainting renderer with diffusion auto-encoder,

    T. Liu, C. Du, S. Fan, F. Chen, and K. Yu, “Diffdub: Person- generic visual dubbing using inpainting renderer with diffusion auto-encoder,” inICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Con- ference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2024, pp. 3630–3634

    work page 2024

Show all 36 references
  1. [9]

    (voick): Enhancing accessibility in audiobooks through voice cloning technology,

    M. A. M. Ahmed, K. A. Elghamrawy, and Z. A. E. H. Taha, “(voick): Enhancing accessibility in audiobooks through voice cloning technology,” in2024 6th International Conference on Computing and Informatics (ICCI). IEEE, 2024, pp. 46–52

    2024

  2. [10]

    Person- alized voice command systems in multi modal user interface,

    E. Kurniawati, L. Celetto, N. Capovilla, and S. George, “Person- alized voice command systems in multi modal user interface,” in 2012 IEEE International Conference on Emerging Signal Pro- cessing Applications. IEEE, 2012, pp. 45–47

    2012

  3. [11]

    Triaan- vc: Triple adaptive attention normalization for any-to-any voice conversion,

    H. J. Park, S. W. Yang, J. S. Kim, W. Shin, and S. W. Han, “Triaan- vc: Triple adaptive attention normalization for any-to-any voice conversion,” inICASSP 2023-2023 IEEE International Confer- ence on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–5

    2023

  4. [12]

    Converting anyone’s emotion: Towards speaker-independent emotional voice conver- sion,

    K. Zhou, B. Sisman, M. Zhang, and H. Li, “Converting anyone’s emotion: Towards speaker-independent emotional voice conver- sion,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.07025, 2020

    2005 arXiv

  5. [13]

    One-shot voice conversion by vector quantization,

    D.-Y . Wu and H.-y. Lee, “One-shot voice conversion by vector quantization,” inICASSP 2020-2020 IEEE International Con- ference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2020, pp. 7734–7738

    2020

  6. [14]

    Vqmivc: Vector quantization and mutual information-based un- supervised speech representation disentanglement for one-shot voice conversion,

    D. Wang, L. Deng, Y . T. Yeung, X. Chen, X. Liu, and H. Meng, “Vqmivc: Vector quantization and mutual information-based un- supervised speech representation disentanglement for one-shot voice conversion,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.10132, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Leveraging diverse semantic-based audio pre- trained models for singing voice conversion,

    X. Zhang, Z. Fang, Y . Gu, H. Chen, L. Zou, J. Zhang, L. Xue, and Z. Wu, “Leveraging diverse semantic-based audio pre- trained models for singing voice conversion,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.11160, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Styletts-vc: One-shot voice conversion by knowledge transfer from style-based tts models,

    Y . A. Li, C. Han, and N. Mesgarani, “Styletts-vc: One-shot voice conversion by knowledge transfer from style-based tts models,” in2022 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT). IEEE, 2023, pp. 920–927

    2023

  9. [17]

    Ace- vc: Adaptive and controllable voice conversion using explicitly disentangled self-supervised speech representations,

    S. Hussain, P. Neekhara, J. Huang, J. Li, and B. Ginsburg, “Ace- vc: Adaptive and controllable voice conversion using explicitly disentangled self-supervised speech representations,” inICASSP 2023-2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (I...

    2023

  10. [18]

    Incre- mental disentanglement for environment-aware zero-shot text-to- speech synthesis,

    Y .-X. Lu, H.-P. Du, Z.-Y . Sheng, Y . Ai, and Z.-H. Ling, “Incre- mental disentanglement for environment-aware zero-shot text-to- speech synthesis,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.16977, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Unsupervised end-to-end learning of discrete linguistic units for voice conversion,

    A. T. Liu, P.-c. Hsu, and H.-y. Lee, “Unsupervised end-to-end learning of discrete linguistic units for voice conversion,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.11563, 2019

    1905 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Hybridvc: Efficient voice style conversion with text and audio prompts,

    X. Niu, J. Zhang, and C. P. Martin, “Hybridvc: Efficient voice style conversion with text and audio prompts,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.15637, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Towards general-purpose text-instruction-guided voice conversion,

    C.-Y . Kuan, C.-A. Li, T.-Y . Hsu, T.-Y . Lin, H.-L. Chung, K.-W. Chang, S.-Y . Chang, and H.-y. Lee, “Towards general-purpose text-instruction-guided voice conversion,” in2023 IEEE Auto- matic Speech Recognition and Understanding Workshop (ASRU). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–8

    2023

  14. [22]

    Promptvc: Flexible stylistic voice conversion in latent space driven by natural language prompts,

    J. Yao, Y . Yang, Y . Lei, Z. Ning, Y . Hu, Y . Pan, J. Yin, H. Zhou, H. Lu, and L. Xie, “Promptvc: Flexible stylistic voice conversion in latent space driven by natural language prompts,” inICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Process...

    2024

  15. [23]

    Environment aware text-to-speech synthesis,

    D. Tan, G. Zhang, and T. Lee, “Environment aware text-to-speech synthesis,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.03887, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Recent advancements in speech en- hancement,

    Y . Ephraim and I. Cohen, “Recent advancements in speech en- hancement,”The electrical engineering handbook, vol. 35, 2006

    2006

  17. [25]

    and DNN-based speaker encoder [26], extracting content- preserving speech tokensu 1:L and speaker-discriminative em- beddingse spk. 2.3. Diffusion Backbone As illustrated in Figure 1(a), our diffusion backbone employs a U-Net architecture to iteratively denoise Gaussian-corrup...

  18. [26]

    V oiceldm: Text-to- speech with environmental context,

    Y . Lee, I. Yeon, J. Nam, and J. S. Chung, “V oiceldm: Text-to- speech with environmental context,” inICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Pro- cessing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2024, pp. 12 566–12 571

    2024

  19. [27]

    Clap learning audio concepts from natural language supervision,

    B. Elizalde, S. Deshmukh, M. Al Ismail, and H. Wang, “Clap learning audio concepts from natural language supervision,” in ICASSP 2023-2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–5

    2023

  20. [28]

    Learning the unlearned: Mitigating feature suppression in con- trastive learning,

    J. Zhang, X. Lan, X. Qu, Y . Cheng, M. Feng, and B. Hooi, “Learning the unlearned: Mitigating feature suppression in con- trastive learning,” inEuropean Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 2024, pp. 35–52

    2024

  21. [29]

    Prompttts: Control- lable text-to-speech with text descriptions,

    Z. Guo, Y . Leng, Y . Wu, S. Zhao, and X. Tan, “Prompttts: Control- lable text-to-speech with text descriptions,” inICASSP 2023-2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–5

    2023

  22. [30]

    Libritts-p: A corpus with speaking style and speaker identity prompts for text-to-speech and style captioning,

    M. Kawamura, R. Yamamoto, Y . Shirahata, T. Hasumi, and K. Tachibana, “Libritts-p: A corpus with speaking style and speaker identity prompts for text-to-speech and style captioning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.07969, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Glm-4-voice: Towards intelligent and human-like end- to-end spoken chatbot,

    A. Zeng, Z. Du, M. Liu, K. Wang, S. Jiang, L. Zhao, Y . Dong, and J. Tang, “Glm-4-voice: Towards intelligent and human-like end- to-end spoken chatbot,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.02612, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    X-vectors: Robust dnn embeddings for speaker recognition,

    D. Snyder, D. Garcia-Romero, G. Sell, D. Povey, and S. Khudan- pur, “X-vectors: Robust dnn embeddings for speaker recognition,” in2018 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2018, pp. 5329–5333

    2018

  25. [33]

    Libritts-r: A restored multi-speaker text-to-speech corpus,

    Y . Koizumi, H. Zen, S. Karita, Y . Ding, K. Yatabe, N. Morioka, M. Bacchiani, Y . Zhang, W. Han, and A. Bapna, “Libritts-r: A restored multi-speaker text-to-speech corpus,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.18802, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  26. [34]

    gpurir: A python library for room impulse response simulation with gpu acceler- ation,

    D. Diaz-Guerra, A. Miguel, and J. R. Beltran, “gpurir: A python library for room impulse response simulation with gpu acceler- ation,”Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 5653–5671, 2021

    2021

  27. [35]

    Freevc: Towards high-quality text-free one-shot voice conversion,

    J. Li, W. Tu, and L. Xiao, “Freevc: Towards high-quality text-free one-shot voice conversion,” inICASSP 2023-2023 IEEE Inter- national Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–5

    2023

  28. [36]

    Robust speech recognition via large-scale weak supervision,

    A. Radford, J. W. Kim, T. Xu, G. Brockman, C. McLeavey, and I. Sutskever, “Robust speech recognition via large-scale weak supervision,” inInternational conference on machine learning. PMLR, 2023, pp. 28 492–28 518

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.