Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 45 references

Charged scalar boson in Melvin universe

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A charged scalar boson in the Melvin magnetic universe has quantized energies that reduce to modified Landau levels, with rotation adding a linear frequency shift and a hard-wall confining term.

desk verdict Clean Whittaker reduction for a charged scalar in Melvin, but the Planck-scale claims rest on a selective truncation and the figures don't match the formulas. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.07329 v1 pith:6V5TBDQB submitted 2025-06-09 gr-qc

L. G. Barbosa , L. C. N. Santos , J. V. Zamperlini , F. M da Silva , C. C. Barros Jr This is my paper
classification gr-qc
keywords MelvinuniverseKlein-GordonequationchargedscalarbosonenergyspectrumLandaulevelsnon-inertialrotatingframestrongmagneticfieldsWhittakerfunctions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper works out the quantum energy levels of a charged scalar boson in the Melvin universe, an exact Einstein–Maxwell spacetime shaped by a static axial magnetic field. Solving the covariant Klein–Gordon equation with minimal coupling, it obtains closed-form spectra in which the familiar flat-spacetime Landau levels acquire extra terms proportional to Newton's constant $G$ alongside the usual magnetic terms. In a rotating reference frame the same derivation yields a critical radius that bounds the radial coordinate, shifts every level by $\omega\ell$, and, when the field is confined by a hard wall at that radius, replaces the magnetic oscillator spacing with a $\pi^2/r_c^2$ quantization. The formulas are evaluated at field scales from heavy-ion collisions up to near the Planck scale, where the gravitational corrections become visible. If correct, the paper gives concrete predictions for how spacetime curvature, magnetic field strength, and observer rotation separately move the energy levels of charged quantum matter.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Melvin metric function $\Lambda(r)=1+\tfrac14 G B_0^2 r^2$, which encodes how the axial magnetic field curves spacetime and enters every term of the Klein–Gordon equation. The argument proceeds by inserting the ansatz $\Psi=e^{-i\varepsilon t}e^{i\ell\phi}e^{ip_z z}R(r)$, expanding $\Lambda^N$ to first order in $G B_0^2 r^2$, and changing variables to $z=\zeta r^2$, which brings the radial equation into Whittaker form. Quantization is imposed by the polynomial condition $a=-n$ on Kummer's confluent hypergeometric function $M(a,b,z)$, and in the finite-critical-radius case the same function's asymptotic expansion enforces $R(r_c)=0$, yielding the $1/r_c^2$ energy spacing.

What would settle it

Solve Eq. (37) numerically with the full metric instead of the truncated expansion, keeping the term $\tfrac34 e\ell B_0 G B_0^2 r^2$ that is dropped in passing to Eq. (38), and compare the $n=0$, $\ell=1$ energy at $B_0=0.1\,m_P^2$ with Eq. (50); a difference comparable to the claimed gravitational correction would falsify the first-order spectrum.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that the radial Klein–Gordon equation for a charged scalar boson in the Melvin metric becomes, after expanding $\Lambda(r)=1+\tfrac14 G B_0^2 r^2$ to first order in $G$, a Whittaker equation whose normalizable solutions quantize the energy as $$ \varepsilon_{\pm}=\pm\sqrt{$m^{2}$+$p_z^{2}$+$GB_0^{2}$\$ell^{2}$-e\ell B_0+B_0\sqrt{$e^{2}$+$2Gm^{2}$}\,(2n+1+|\ell|)}. $$ In the rotating frame the same derivation replaces $\varepsilon$ by $\varepsilon+\omega\ell$, so the spectrum is $\varepsilon_{\pm}=-\omega\ell\pm\sqrt{\cdots}$, and at finite critical radius $r_c$ the hard-wall condition $R(r_c)=0$ turns the magnetic oscillator term into $\pi^2 r_c^{-2}(n+|\ell|/2+1/2)^2$. The paper interprets the $GB_0^2\ell^2$ and $\sqrt{e^2+2Gm^2}$ terms as gravitational corrections to Landau quantization and the $\omega\ell$ shift as the non-inertial signature; numerically these corrections are negligible at $10^{19}$ G but visibly reorder the $n$ and $\ell$ dependence at $B_0\sim 0.1\,m_P^2$.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation depends on expanding the Melvin metric factor $\Lambda(r)=1+\tfrac14 G B_0^2 r^2$ to first order in Newton's constant and treating all dropped terms as negligible, even at Planck-scale magnetic fields.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At heavy-ion-collision fields ($B_0\sim 10^{19}$ G), the gravitational terms in the spectrum are numerically negligible, so the main new effect is the non-inertial $\omega\ell$ shift.
  • Near the Planck scale, the $GB_0^2\ell^2$ and $B_0\sqrt{e^2+2Gm^2}$ terms can outweigh the $e\ell B_0$ term and reorder the levels as $\ell$ grows.
  • For a rotating observer, every state $\{n,\ell\}$ has a critical angular velocity beyond which the positive-energy branch $\varepsilon_+$ becomes negative.
  • In the regime with a finite critical radius, increasing $\omega$ (shrinking $r_c$) raises the positive energies through the $\pi^2/r_c^2$ confinement term, which dominates the downward $\omega\ell$ shift at high $\omega$.
  • In the zero-field limit the rotating-frame spectrum becomes $\varepsilon_{\pm}=-\omega\ell\pm\sqrt{m^2+p_z^2}$, so rotation alone splits the levels linearly in $\ell$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next step is to apply the same rotating-frame construction to the Dirac equation in the Melvin spacetime; comparing scalar and spinor spectra would isolate a spin–rotation coupling from the orbital $\omega\ell$ shift.
  • The hard-wall spectrum suggests a direct probe: measuring the spacing between adjacent $n$ levels in a rotating magnetized system would determine the critical radius $r_c$ and hence the combination $\omega^2-GB_0^2$.
  • The authors' first-order truncation of $\Lambda(r)$ should be checked against a numerical solution of the full radial equation at $B_0\sim 0.1\,m_P^2$; this is the fastest way to see whether the claimed gravitational corrections survive beyond the approximation.
  • If the spectra hold, they give a clean starting point for computing quantum processes in magnetized curved spacetime, such as pair-production or decay rates, where the level spacing enters the phase-space factors.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives closed-form energy spectra for a charged scalar boson minimally coupled to the electromagnetic field in the Melvin magnetic universe, in both inertial and rotating frames. The radial Klein-Gordon equation is reduced to a Whittaker equation after expanding the Melvin function to first order in GB0^2 r^2, yielding Landau-like levels with gravitational corrections; the rotating case is treated either with an infinite radial domain or with a hard wall at the critical radius.

Significance. If the derivation were fully consistent, the paper would be a useful analytic example of curved-spacetime Landau quantization with non-inertial effects. Strengths include the exact collapse of the rotating-frame equation to the inertial one with ε → ε + ωℓ (Eqs. 55-56), the correct B0 → 0 flat limit (Eq. 51), and the explicit Whittaker solutions. However, the headline Planck-scale spectra rest on a selective truncation that is not a controlled expansion, and the hard-wall quantization contains a phase discrepancy. For realistic heavy-ion fields with GB0^2 ≪ 1 the main numerical results are probably unaffected, which limits the damage but does not cure the inconsistent strong-field claims.

major comments (2)
  1. [Eq. (37) to Eq. (40), Sec. IV] The step from Eq. (37) to Eq. (38) is selective: it keeps the O(GB0^2 ℓ^2) term from Λ^4 and the O(Gm^2B0^2r^2) term from Λ^2, but drops the O(GB0^3r^2) term (3/4)eℓG B0^3 r^2 that comes from eℓB0Λ^3. This dropped term is first order in the same expansion parameter GB0^2r^2. For B0 = 0.1 mP^2, e = √(4πα), ℓ = 1, the dropped coefficient is approximately (3eℓGB0)/(e^2+2Gm^2) ≈ 0.99 of the retained oscillator coefficient (e^2/4+Gm^2/2)B0^2, so it is not a small correction. Including this term changes ζ^2 to (e^2/4+Gm^2/2)B0^2 − (3/4)eℓG B0^3, which can even change the sign of the radial potential for appropriate ℓ. Consequently, Eqs. (50) and (59) are not the consistent first-order spectra of Eq. (37) at the stated Planck-scale fields; the derivation must either keep the term or restrict its validity to GB0 ≪ 1, which covers the heavy-ion scale but not the Planck-scale curves and their associated gravitational corrections.
  2. [Eq. (62) to Eq. (63), Sec. V.B] The hard-wall quantization condition appears to have a phase error. Substituting a = 1/2 + |ℓ|/2 − τ^2/(4ζ) and b = 1 + |ℓ| into the asymptotic formula (62) gives b − 2a = τ^2/(2ζ), so the cosine argument is |τ|r_c − (1+|ℓ|)π/2 + π/4. Setting this to π/2 + nπ yields |τ|r_c = (n + 3/4 + |ℓ|/2)π, not (n + 1/2 + |ℓ|/2)π as in Eq. (63). Unless the formula in (62) is being used with a different normalization, the energy spectrum (63) needs to be corrected by π/4 in the quantization phase. Additionally, the statement that Eq. (62) applies for z0 ≪ 1 is not the standard small-argument expansion of M(a,b,z), which would be M ≈ 1; please verify the regime of validity of this asymptotic approximation.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (30)] The notation Λ_N(r) is introduced with an explicit integer N, but N is never specified; the subsequent text simply uses the linear approximation. Please clarify what N represents or remove the subscript.
  2. [Abstract and Sec. III] The abstract says non-inertial effects result in a 'modified spacetime geometry,' but the transformation ϕ = χ + ωt is a coordinate redefinition of the same Melvin spacetime, not a new solution of the Einstein-Maxwell equations. This wording could mislead readers and should be revised.
  3. [Eq. (55)] The grouped terms in Eq. (55) cancel identically before any approximation; this is correct, but the presentation could be shortened to avoid the appearance of a non-trivial cancellation step.
  4. [Figs. 3 and 4] In Fig. 3(b) and Fig. 4(b) the wave-function values span many orders of magnitude, which makes the oscillatory structure hard to see; a normalized amplitude or a logarithmic scale would improve readability.
  5. [Conclusions] The phrase 'for the first time in the literature' is not verifiable from the cited references and is stronger than needed; I recommend a more measured formulation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the spectra follow from the Melvin metric and the covariant Klein-Gordon equation, with no fitted inputs and no load-bearing self-citations.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained: the Melvin metric (Eqs. 19-21) and the covariant Klein-Gordon equation (Eq. 33) are the inputs; the radial equation (Eq. 37), the Whittaker solution (Eq. 48), the polynomiality condition (Eq. 49), and the resulting spectra (Eqs. 50, 59, 63) are all derived by explicit algebra within the paper. No parameter is fitted to data, and no quantity is renamed and then presented as a prediction; the flat-spacetime limits (Eqs. 51 and 60) are consistency checks that recover known results instead of being used as inputs. Author self-citations ([26], [29], [30], [35]-[38]) appear only for background comparisons and for the standard rotating-frame procedure phi = chi + omega t, which the paper applies directly in Eq. (26) rather than importing as an unverified premise; no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is taken from these citations. The approximation Lambda_N(r) of Eq. (30) is stated and justified in the paper itself. The skeptic concern about Eq. (37)-to-(38) dropping the O(GB0^2) part of e*l*B0*Lambda^3 is a consistency/truncation issue at Planck-scale fields, not a case where a result equals its input by construction, so it does not constitute circularity under the criteria of this pass. No circular step can be exhibited, and the appropriate finding is a low score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The derivation relies on standard relativistic wave equations and special-function technology. The only physically adjustable inputs are the magnetic field strength B0, the rotation frequency ω, the charge e, the mass m, and the quantum numbers; none are fitted to data. The main non-standard assumption is the selective truncation of the Λ expansion, which is load-bearing for the Planck-scale corrections, and the light-cylinder boundary condition for the rotating frame.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Melvin line element (19) with Λ = 1 + G B0² r² / 4 is the correct Einstein-Maxwell background for an axial magnetic field.
    Section II, Eqs. (17)-(21). The analysis is carried out entirely in this spacetime.
  • standard math The covariant Klein-Gordon equation (33) with minimal electromagnetic coupling governs a charged scalar boson.
    Section IV. Standard QFT in curved spacetime; no alternative wave equation is considered.
  • domain assumption The angular coordinate transformation φ = χ + ωt defines a physical non-inertial frame, and the physical radial domain is limited by g_tt = 0 at r = r_c.
    Section III, Eqs. (26)-(31); the light-cylinder cutoff and the hard-wall boundary condition R(r_c) = 0 are model choices, not consequences of the field equation alone.
  • ad hoc to paper Terms of order G B0² r² in the expansion of Λ may be kept selectively, dropping the (3/4) eℓB0 G B0² r² term from Λ³.
    Section IV, Eqs. (30)-(40); this truncation is not justified by a stated hierarchy and affects the claimed gravitational corrections at Planck-like fields.
  • standard math The uniform asymptotic formula (62) for the Kummer function M(a,b,z0) yields the hard-wall quantization condition.
    Section V.B; the zero condition is used to obtain Eq. (63), although a direct reading of Eq. (62) suggests a possible π/4 phase shift in the argument.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Charged scalar boson in Melvin universe." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6V5TBDQB

@misc{pith2026250607329,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Charged scalar boson in Melvin universe},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6V5TBDQB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.07329}
}
read the original abstract

This work investigates the dynamics of a charged scalar boson in the Melvin universe by solving the Klein-Gordon equation with minimal coupling in both inertial and non-inertial frames. Non-inertial effects are introduced through a rotating reference frame, resulting in a modified spacetime geometry and the appearance of a critical radius that limits the radial domain of the field. Analytical solutions are obtained under appropriate approximations, and the corresponding energy spectra are derived. The results indicate that both the magnetic field and non-inertial effects modify the energy levels, with additional contributions depending on the coupling between the rotation parameter and the quantum numbers. A numerical analysis is also presented, illustrating the behavior of the solutions for two characteristic magnetic field scales: one that may be considered extreme, of the order of the ones proposed to be produced in heavy-ion collisions and another near the Planck scale.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.07329 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Kretschmann scalar against radial coordinate for different values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Comparison of critical radius behavior with respect to angular velocity for two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Comparison of radial wave functions for different magnetic field strengths. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Probability density functions for different magnetic field strengths. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Plot of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Comparison of positive energy levels for different magnetic field strengths. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Energy levels against [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Energy levels against quantum number [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Comparison of positive energy levels for different magnetic field strengths with non [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Comparison of positive energy levels for different magnetic field strengths with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_10.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Conversely, asr→ ∞, the Kretschmann scalar vanishes,K→0. In Fig. 1 we can observe the behavior of the Kretschmann scalarKnear the origin (r= 0) and forr→ ∞for four different values of the magnetic field strengthB 0. 6 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 r/lP 0 2 4 6 8K(r)/m4 P ×10−12 B0 = 0.0001 m2 P B0 = 0.0002 m2 P B0 = 0.0005 m2 P B0 = 0.0008 m2 P FIG. 1: Kre...

    work page 2000

  2. [2]

    The imposition of the hard-wall boundary condition leads to the following quantization condition for the energy spectrum: ε± =−ωℓ± s m2 +p 2 z +GB 2 0ℓ2 −eℓB 0 + π2 r2 c n+ |ℓ| 2 + 1 2 2 ,(63) 19 wheren= 0,1,2, . . .. In this regime, the approximatingr 2 c ≈ω −2 leads to the following energy spectrum: ε± ≈ −ωℓ± s m2 +p 2 z +GB 2 0ℓ2 −eℓB 0 +π 2ω2 n+ |ℓ| 2...

    work page arXiv

  3. [3]

    The soft gamma repeaters as very strongly magnetized neu- tron stars-i. radiative mechanism for outbursts,

    C. Thompson and R. C. Duncan, “The soft gamma repeaters as very strongly magnetized neu- tron stars-i. radiative mechanism for outbursts,”Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 275, no. 2, pp. 255–300, 1995

    work page 1995

  4. [4]

    Magnetars: properties, origin and evolution,

    S. Mereghetti, J. A. Pons, and A. Melatos, “Magnetars: properties, origin and evolution,” Space Science Reviews, vol. 191, pp. 315–338, 2015

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    On Magnetized Neutron Stars,

    L. L. Lopes and D. Menezes, “On Magnetized Neutron Stars,”Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 08, p. 002, 2015

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    Event-by-event fluctuations of magnetic and electric fields in heavy ion collisions,

    A. Bzdak and V. Skokov, “Event-by-event fluctuations of magnetic and electric fields in heavy ion collisions,”Physics Letters B, vol. 710, no. 1, pp. 171–174, 2012. 22

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    Electromagnetic field evolution in relativistic heavy-ion collisions,

    V. Voronyuk, V. D. Toneev, W. Cassing, E. L. Bratkovskaya, V. P. Konchakovski, and S. A. Voloshin, “Electromagnetic field evolution in relativistic heavy-ion collisions,”Physical Review C, vol. 83, no. 5, p. 054911, 2011

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    Magnetohydrodynamics, charged currents, and directed flow in heavy ion collisions,

    U. G¨ ursoy, D. Kharzeev, and K. Rajagopal, “Magnetohydrodynamics, charged currents, and directed flow in heavy ion collisions,”Physical Review C, vol. 89, no. 5, p. 054905, 2014

    work page 2014

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    Strongly interacting matter in extreme magnetic fields,

    P. Adhikari, M. Ammon, S. S. Avancini, A. Ayala, A. Bandyopadhyay, D. Blaschke, F. L. Braghin, P. Buividovich, R. P. Cardoso, C. Cartwright,et al., “Strongly interacting matter in extreme magnetic fields,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.18632, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Relativistic quantum dynamics of a charged particle in cosmic string spacetime in the presence of magnetic field and scalar potential,

    E. R. Figueiredo Medeiros and E. R. Bezerra de Mello, “Relativistic quantum dynamics of a charged particle in cosmic string spacetime in the presence of magnetic field and scalar potential,”The European Physical Journal C, vol. 72, no. 6, p. 2051, 2012

    2012

  3. [11]

    Exact solutions of the klein–gordon equation in the presence of a dyon, magnetic flux and scalar potential in the spacetime of gravitational defects,

    A. L. C. de Oliveira and E. R. B. de Mello, “Exact solutions of the klein–gordon equation in the presence of a dyon, magnetic flux and scalar potential in the spacetime of gravitational defects,”Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 23, pp. 5249–5263, 2006

    2006

  4. [12]

    Exact solutions of scalar bosons in the presence of the aharonov-bohm and coulomb potentials in the gravitational field of topological defects,

    A. Boumali and H. Aounallah, “Exact solutions of scalar bosons in the presence of the aharonov-bohm and coulomb potentials in the gravitational field of topological defects,”Ad- vances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2018, no. 1, p. 1031763, 2018

    2018

  5. [13]

    Exact solutions of the schr¨ odinger equation with a coulomb ring-shaped potential in the cosmic string spacetime,

    Z. Wang, Z.-w. Long, C.-y. Long, and J. Teng, “Exact solutions of the schr¨ odinger equation with a coulomb ring-shaped potential in the cosmic string spacetime,”Physica Scripta, vol. 90, no. 5, p. 055201, 2015

    2015

  6. [14]

    Landau quantization in the spinning cosmic string spacetime,

    C. R. Muniz, V. B. Bezerra, and M. S. Cunha, “Landau quantization in the spinning cosmic string spacetime,”Annals of Physics, vol. 350, pp. 105–111, 2014

    2014

  7. [15]

    Solutions of the schr¨ odinger equation for pseudo-coulomb potential plus a new improved ring-shaped potential in the cosmic string space–time,

    A. N. Ikot, T. M. Abbey, E. O. Chukwuocha, and M. C. Onyeaju, “Solutions of the schr¨ odinger equation for pseudo-coulomb potential plus a new improved ring-shaped potential in the cosmic string space–time,”Canadian Journal of Physics, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 517–521, 2016

    2016

  8. [16]

    Effects of cosmic string on non-relativistic quantum particles with potential and thermodynamic properties,

    F. Ahmed, “Effects of cosmic string on non-relativistic quantum particles with potential and thermodynamic properties,”International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 62, no. 7, p. 142, 2023

    2023

  9. [17]

    Rotating effects on the Dirac oscillator in the cosmic string spacetime,

    K. Bakke, “Rotating effects on the Dirac oscillator in the cosmic string spacetime,”General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 45, pp. 1847–1859, 2013. 23

    2013

  10. [18]

    Relativistic landau quantization for a neutral particle,

    K. Bakke and C. Furtado, “Relativistic landau quantization for a neutral particle,”Physical Review A, vol. 80, p. 032106, Sept. 2009

    2009

  11. [19]

    Anandan quantum phase for a neutral particle with fermi–walker reference frame in the cosmic string background,

    K. Bakke and C. Furtado, “Anandan quantum phase for a neutral particle with fermi–walker reference frame in the cosmic string background,”The European Physical Journal C, vol. 69, pp. 531–539, 2010

    2010

  12. [20]

    Generalized dirac oscillator in cosmic string space-time,

    L.-F. Deng, C.-Y. Long, Z.-W. Long, and T. Xu, “Generalized dirac oscillator in cosmic string space-time,”Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2018, no. 1, p. 2741694, 2018

    2018

  13. [21]

    The dirac oscillator in a spinning cosmic string spacetime,

    M. Hosseinpour, H. Hassanabadi, and M. de Montigny, “The dirac oscillator in a spinning cosmic string spacetime,”The European Physical Journal C, vol. 79, pp. 1–7, 2019

    2019

  14. [22]

    Scattering states of dirac equation in the presence of cosmic string for coulomb interaction,

    M. Hosseinpour and H. Hassanabadi, “Scattering states of dirac equation in the presence of cosmic string for coulomb interaction,”International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 30, no. 21, p. 1550124, 2015

    2015

  15. [23]

    Exact solution of the dirac equation for a coulomb and scalar potentials in the gravitational field of a cosmic string,

    G. d. A. Marques, V. B. Bezerra, and S. G. Fernandes, “Exact solution of the dirac equation for a coulomb and scalar potentials in the gravitational field of a cosmic string,”Physics Letters A, vol. 341, no. 1-4, pp. 39–47, 2005

    2005

  16. [24]

    Dirac oscillator in the cosmic string spacetime in the context of gravity’s rainbow,

    K. Bakke and H. Mota, “Dirac oscillator in the cosmic string spacetime in the context of gravity’s rainbow,”The European Physical Journal Plus, vol. 133, pp. 1–9, 2018

    2018

  17. [25]

    Scattering and bound states for the hulth´ en potential in a cosmic string background,

    M. Hosseinpour, F. M. Andrade, E. O. Silva, and H. Hassanabadi, “Scattering and bound states for the hulth´ en potential in a cosmic string background,”The European Physical Journal C, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 1–6, 2017

    2017

  18. [26]

    Dirac oscillator in a spinning cosmic string spacetime in external magnetic fields: Investigation of the energy spectrum and the connection with condensed matter physics,

    M. M. Cunha, H. S. Dias, and E. O. Silva, “Dirac oscillator in a spinning cosmic string spacetime in external magnetic fields: Investigation of the energy spectrum and the connection with condensed matter physics,”Physical Review D, vol. 102, no. 10, p. 105020, 2020

    2020

  19. [27]

    On the 2d dirac oscillator in the presence of vector and scalar potentials in the cosmic string spacetime in the context of spin and pseudospin symmetries,

    D. F. Lima, F. M. Andrade, L. B. Castro, C. Filgueiras, and E. O. Silva, “On the 2d dirac oscillator in the presence of vector and scalar potentials in the cosmic string spacetime in the context of spin and pseudospin symmetries,”The European Physical Journal C, vol. 79, pp. 1...

    2019

  20. [28]

    Dirac equation and the Melvin metric,

    L. C. N. Santos and C. C. Barros, “Dirac equation and the Melvin metric,”European Physical Journal C, vol. 76, p. 560, Oct. 2016

    2016

  21. [29]

    Static and dynamic melvin universes,

    D. Bini and B. Mashhoon, “Static and dynamic melvin universes,”Physical Review D, vol. 105, no. 12, p. 124012, 2022. 24

    2022

  22. [30]

    Bonnor-Melvin universe with a cosmological constant,

    M. ˇZofka, “Bonnor-Melvin universe with a cosmological constant,”Physical Review D, vol. 99, no. 4, p. 044058, 2019

    2019

  23. [31]

    Scalar bosons in Bonnor-Melvin-Λ universe: exact solution, Landau levels and Coulomb-like potential,

    L. G. Barbosa and C. C. Barros, “Scalar bosons in Bonnor-Melvin-Λ universe: exact solution, Landau levels and Coulomb-like potential,”Physica Scripta, vol. 100, no. 3, p. 035302, 2025

    2025

  24. [32]

    Klein-Gordon Oscillator Subject to a Coulomb-type Poten- tial in Bonnor-Melvin Universe with a Cosmological Constant,

    L. G. Barbosa and C. C. Barros, “Klein-Gordon Oscillator Subject to a Coulomb-type Poten- tial in Bonnor-Melvin Universe with a Cosmological Constant,”Few-Body Systems, vol. 66, no. 1, p. 7, 2025

    2025

  25. [33]

    Quantum electrodynamics in strong magnetic fields. i. electron states,

    D. B. Melrose and A. J. Parle, “Quantum electrodynamics in strong magnetic fields. i. electron states,”Australian journal of physics, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 755–774, 1983

    1983

  26. [34]

    Noninertial effects on the dirac oscillator in a topological defect spacetime,

    K. Bakke, “Noninertial effects on the dirac oscillator in a topological defect spacetime,”The European Physical Journal Plus, vol. 127, pp. 1–8, 2012

    2012

  27. [35]

    Noninertial effects on the ground state energy of a massive scalar field in the cosmic string spacetime,

    H. F. Mota and K. Bakke, “Noninertial effects on the ground state energy of a massive scalar field in the cosmic string spacetime,”Physical Review D, vol. 89, no. 2, p. 027702, 2014

    2014

  28. [36]

    Non-inertial effects on relativistic scalar massive charged bosons in a topologically nontrivial space-time and aharonov–bohm effect,

    F. Ahmed, “Non-inertial effects on relativistic scalar massive charged bosons in a topologically nontrivial space-time and aharonov–bohm effect,”International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics, vol. 20, no. 01, p. 2350011, 2023

    2023

  29. [37]

    Some remarks on scalar particles under the influence of noninertial effects in a spacetime with a screw dislocation,

    L. C. N. Santos, F. M. da Silva, C. E. Mota, and V. B. Bezerra, “Some remarks on scalar particles under the influence of noninertial effects in a spacetime with a screw dislocation,” The European Physical Journal Plus, vol. 138, no. 2, p. 174, 2023

    2023

  30. [38]

    Scalar bosons under the influence of noninertial effects in the cosmic string spacetime,

    L. C. N. Santos and C. C. Barros, “Scalar bosons under the influence of noninertial effects in the cosmic string spacetime,”The European Physical Journal C, vol. 77, pp. 1–7, 2017

    2017

  31. [39]

    Relativistic quantum motion of spin-0 particles under the influence of noninertial effects in the cosmic string spacetime,

    L. C. N. Santos and C. C. Barros, “Relativistic quantum motion of spin-0 particles under the influence of noninertial effects in the cosmic string spacetime,”The European Physical Journal C, vol. 78, pp. 1–8, 2018

    2018

  32. [40]

    Non-inertial effects on a non- relativistic quantum harmonic oscillator in the presence of a screw dislocation,

    L. C. N. Santos, F. M. Da Silva, C. E. Mota, and V. B. Bezerra, “Non-inertial effects on a non- relativistic quantum harmonic oscillator in the presence of a screw dislocation,”International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics, vol. 20, no. 04, p. 2350067, 2023

    2023

  33. [41]

    Static Magnetic Fields in General Relativity,

    W. B. Bonnor, “Static Magnetic Fields in General Relativity,”Proceedings of the Physical Society A, vol. 67, pp. 225–232, Mar. 1954

    1954

  34. [42]

    Pure magnetic and electric geons,

    M. A. Melvin, “Pure magnetic and electric geons,”Physics Letters, vol. 8, pp. 65–68, Jan. 1964. 25

    1964

  35. [43]

    Dynamics of Cylindrical Electromagnetic Universes,

    M. A. Melvin, “Dynamics of Cylindrical Electromagnetic Universes,”Physical Review, vol. 139, pp. 225–243, July 1965

    1965

  36. [44]

    Absolute Stability of Melvin’s Magnetic Universe,

    K. S. Thorne, “Absolute Stability of Melvin’s Magnetic Universe,”Physical Review, vol. 139, pp. 244–254, July 1965

    1965

  37. [45]

    Abramowitz and I

    M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun,Handbook of mathematical functions: with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables, vol. 55. Courier Corporation, 1965. Appendix A: Riemann T ensor Components In this appendix, we present the components of the Riemann tensor associated with the g...

    1965

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.