Orbital Hall Effect Enables Field-Free Magnetization Reversal in Ferrimagnets without Additional Conversion Layer

Hui Wen; Kaiming Cai; Kaiyou Wang; Kun Lei; Weihao Li; Wenkai Zhu; Xiangyu Liu; Xiukai Lan; Yongcheng Deng; Zelalem Abebe Bekele

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 45 references

Orbital Hall Effect Enables Field-Free Magnetization Reversal in Ferrimagnets without Additional Conversion Layer

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Orbital Hall currents from a Mo underlayer drive deterministic, field-free switching of a CoGd ferrimagnet at current densities down to $2.51\times10^{6}$ A cm$^{-2}$, without an extra conversion layer.

desk verdict Field-free switching in Mo/CoGd is probably real, but the orbital mechanism is underdetermined and the novelty overlaps heavily with the authors' own prior work. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.07608 v2 pith:QSABAYBY submitted 2025-06-09 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Zelalem Abebe Bekele , Kun Lei , Xiukai Lan , Xiangyu Liu , Hui Wen , Weihao Li , Yongcheng Deng , Wenkai Zhu

show 2 more authors

Kaiming Cai Kaiyou Wang

This is my paper

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords orbitalHalleffectfield-freemagnetizationswitchingferrimagneticCoGdspin-orbittorqueorbital-to-spinconversionplanarorbitronicsperpendicularmagneticanisotropy

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to show that the orbital Hall effect on its own can switch a perpendicular ferrimagnet deterministically, with no external magnetic field and no separate conversion layer. In the Mo/Co$_{71}$Gd$_{29}$ bilayer studied here, the applied current in Mo first becomes an orbital Hall current; the adjacent ferrimagnetic CoGd layer then converts that orbital flow into a spin current and, because its two sublattices are antiferromagnetically coupled, provides part of the switching action itself. The paper reports field-free switching at 20 K and 300 K with opposite polarity below and above the compensation temperature, and a critical current density as low as $2.51\times10^{6}$ A cm$^{-2}$. A sympathetic reader would care because it points toward lower-power magnetization control using abundant light metals rather than heavy spin-Hall metals.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by three coupled elements. First is the orbital Hall effect in Mo: a charge current in this weak-spin-orbit metal produces a transverse flow of orbital angular momentum, $J_{\mathrm{OHE}}$, rather than a spin current. Second is the CoGd ferrimagnet, which does double duty—it converts the incoming orbital current into a spin current through strong spin-orbit coupling, and its antiferromagnetically coupled Co and Gd sublattices set the sign of the net moment, so switching polarity flips across the compensation temperature. Third is the interface-generated planar Hall effect—a magnetoresistance that depends on the in-plane angle between current and magnetization—the enhancement of which is used as the signature of broken in-plane symmetry at the Mo/CoGd surface; this symmetry breaking is what produces the out-of-plane z-polarized damping-like torque. The paper quantifies that torque through the loop-shift parameter $\eta_z$ and the in-plane damping-like fields from harmonic Hall measurements, and uses Mo-thickness and CoGd-thickness series to attribute the z-polarized torque to the interface rather than to competing spin polarization.

What would settle it

A direct measurement of the orbital-to-spin conversion efficiency of the Mo/CoGd interface—for instance by the inverse orbital Hall effect or by comparing Mo with a metal of similar resistivity but different orbital Hall conductivity—would settle whether the orbital channel is quantitatively sufficient. A simpler symmetry test is also available: if the z-polarized torque comes from the Mo/CoGd interface, a symmetric Mo/CoGd/Mo sandwich or a reversed CoGd/Mo stack should eliminate field-free switching at the same current density, whereas the switching would survive if the dominant mechanism were bulk Oersted or Rashba-like interface effects.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a stack as simple as Mo/CoGd carries the complete sequence needed for deterministic perpendicular switching: Mo generates a large orbital Hall current $J_{\mathrm{OHE}}$; CoGd converts it into a spin current $J_{\mathrm{SHE}}$ through strong spin-orbit coupling in the antiferromagnetically coupled Co and Gd sublattices; and in-plane symmetry breaking at the Mo/CoGd interface, evidenced by a pronounced planar Hall effect, produces a z-polarized damping-like torque. This combination yields field-free switching with opposite polarity for the Gd-dominated and Co-dominated sublattice regimes, and a normalized out-of-plane effective field of $\eta_z = 3.54\times10^{-6}$ Oe A$^{-1}$ cm$^{2}$ inferred from hysteresis-loop shifts. The claimed result is that orbital currents alone can do the work usually assigned to spin Hall currents, with the ferrimagnet acting as both converter and switchable layer.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the enhanced planar Hall effect and the harmonic-Hall loop shifts are direct evidence of an interface-generated z-polarized damping-like torque; because the paper does not directly measure Mo's orbital Hall conductivity or the orbital-to-spin conversion efficiency in this exact stack, the field-free switching could in principle be assisted by Rashba-Edelstein effects, Oersted fields, or residual interfacial gradients.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Field-free switching can be achieved in a two-layer stack, so the device no longer needs an external in-plane field, an antiferromagnet, or a dedicated orbital-to-spin conversion layer.
Because Mo is a light, weakly spin-orbit-coupled metal, the same mechanism could replace expensive heavy metals while still generating large torques through the orbital channel.
The switching polarity reverses across the compensation temperature, giving a temperature or composition knob for setting the magnetization orientation deterministically.
The reported critical current density, down to $2.51\times10^{6}$ A cm$^{-2}$, is low enough that orbital-Hall-driven switching could be competitive with conventional spin-Hall switching in low-power devices.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Beyond the paper: if orbital Hall conduction is the active mechanism, other light metals with predicted large orbital Hall conductivity—such as Ru, Ti, and Cu—should also switch ferrimagnets field-free, and comparing their performance would isolate the orbital pathway from interfacial Rashba effects.
Beyond the paper: the paper does not directly measure Mo's orbital Hall conductivity or the orbital-to-spin conversion efficiency in this exact stack, so a quantitative torque measurement, for example by spin-torque ferromagnetic resonance or inverse orbital Hall effect, would test whether the orbital channel alone can account for the observed switching.
Beyond the paper: because the z-polarized torque is tied to interface in-plane symmetry, a symmetric sandwich such as Mo/CoGd/Mo or a reversed CoGd/Mo stack should lose field-free switching; that prediction is testable with the same Hall-bar geometry.
Beyond the paper: the linear current-density dependence of the loop shift suggests that switching efficiency should scale with interface transparency, so inserting an ultrathin spacer at the Mo/CoGd interface would probe how much of the torque survives interface disorder.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short version: the switching data are credible, and the thickness/temperature controls are the best part of the paper. But the key mechanistic claim—that a z-polarized torque from interface symmetry breaking drives the field-free reversal—is not established, and the paper does not cleanly differentiate itself from ref 37.

What's good: the opposite switching polarity across the compensation temperature and the linear loop shift with current density are strong empirical evidence that something current-driven is flipping the magnetization, not just heat. The low Jc of 2.51×10^6 A/cm2 and the Mo thickness series support the idea that the Mo orbital Hall current plays a role. The EDS ruling out a vertical composition gradient is a thoughtful control.

Where it gets soft: the paper leans on a pronounced planar Hall effect as proof of the in-plane symmetry breaking that supposedly generates the z-torque. But PHE is an equilibrium transport anisotropy, not a current-induced torque. The authors do measure loop shifts and harmonic signals, which are more direct, but they never identify the actual symmetry-breaking axis, never report device-to-device reproducibility, and give no error bars. Without knowing what sets the in-plane direction, it's hard to rule out Oersted/thermal artifacts or uncontrolled growth asymmetries. The stress-test note is right that random roughness can't produce reproducible polarity—so the paper needs to say what physical feature breaks the symmetry.

The novelty issue is real. The central idea—orbital current from a light metal converted in a ferrimagnet to achieve switching—is already in ref 37 (the authors' own arXiv) and closely related in ref 38. The paper doesn't explain what is new beyond a different ferrimagnet composition or thickness.

Bottom line: this deserves serious peer review because the empirical findings are important and the experiments are non-trivial. But a referee should demand (i) explicit identification of the symmetry-breaking direction, (ii) error bars and device statistics, (iii) control measurements for Oersted and thermal effects, and (iv) a clear statement of how this differs from ref 37. If those are addressed, it could be a useful contribution to orbitronics.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports field-free current-induced magnetization switching in Mo/CoGd ferrimagnetic bilayers, with switching polarity reversing across the compensation temperature and a critical current density as low as 2.51 × 10^6 A cm^-2. The authors attribute the switching to orbital Hall currents in Mo that are converted into spin currents in CoGd, combined with a z-polarized damping-like torque arising from interfacial in-plane symmetry breaking, supported by planar Hall effect measurements, harmonic Hall analysis, and loop-shift measurements.

Significance. If the mechanism is confirmed, the work offers a promising route to energy-efficient field-free switching using orbital currents without a separate heavy-metal conversion layer, which is of interest for orbitronics and low-power spintronics. The opposite switching polarity across the compensation temperature is a clean experimental signature of the ferrimagnetic sublattice contribution. The paper also provides a quantitative estimate of the out-of-plane effective field and its linear dependence on current density. However, the central mechanistic claim—the existence and origin of an interface-generated z-polarized torque—is not yet directly established, and the significance is therefore conditional on additional verification.

major comments (4)

[Fig. 3b-c and the paragraph 'To verify the in-plane symmetry breaking...'] The enhanced planar Hall effect (PHE) is an equilibrium transport anisotropy and does not by itself demonstrate a current-induced torque with a fixed symmetry axis. The manuscript does not report the angular phase of the PHE relative to the current direction nor a correlation between that phase and the observed switching polarity in Fig. 2b,c. Without a defined global in-plane symmetry-breaking axis, the reproducible deterministic switching polarity is unexplained, and the central claim that the z-polarized torque originates from interfacial symmetry breaking is not established. Please provide angle-resolved PHE data with the phase specified, and ideally a control sample where the symmetry-breaking direction is intentionally modified and the switching polarity is shown to follow.
[Fig. 3d and the loop-shift analysis] While the linear dependence of ΔH_z on J_e is suggestive of an out-of-plane effective field, the analysis assumes that the loop shift arises solely from a z-polarized damping-like torque. The manuscript does not estimate the Oersted field contribution (which, combined with any in-plane magnetization component or device asymmetry, could produce an apparent out-of-plane shift) nor does it show that thermal effects (e.g., current-induced temperature gradients) are negligible for the loop center. Please add error bars, estimate the Oersted field, and provide a control experiment with a symmetric or non-magnetic reference stack to rule out these alternative contributions.
[Fig. 3e,f and the thickness-dependence separation] The separation of the z-torque contributions is indirect: the conclusion that η_z stems from in-plane symmetry breaking rather than from the ferrimagnet relies on the differing thickness dependencies of η_z with Mo and CoGd thickness. This is not a direct measurement of the orbital-to-spin conversion or of the interfacial symmetry. A more direct test would be to insert an ultrathin spacer layer to modify the interface, or to calibrate the orbital torque efficiency using a known spin Hall reference layer in the same stack. As written, the mechanism remains largely inferred rather than directly measured.
[Fig. 2b,c and device reproducibility] The manuscript does not report device-to-device reproducibility statistics for the switching polarity. Since deterministic switching requires a torque sign that is fixed relative to the current direction across the entire device, and since the proposed symmetry-breaking source (interface morphology) could in principle vary from device to device, the authors should state how many devices were measured and confirm that all devices with the same nominal stack exhibit the same switching polarity. Without this, the possibility of unintended sample-specific asymmetries cannot be excluded.

minor comments (6)

[Throughout the manuscript] The symbol for the anomalous Hall resistance is used inconsistently (R_H, R_O, R_AHE); please unify the notation.
[Definition of ΔH_z (p. 8)] The text contains a typo: 'ceneter' should be 'center' in the definition of ΔH_z.
[Author contributions] The author contributions section lists D.G. and Y.M. as participants in analysis and writing, but these initials do not correspond to authors listed on the paper; please correct this inconsistency.
[Sample series description (p. 7 vs Methods)] The main text states that y takes values of 0.5, 1.5, and 2 nm, but the Methods list y = 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 nm, and Fig. 3e shows y from 0.2 to 2 nm; please make the sample series consistent.
[Discussion of Mo(4)/CoGd(5) (p. 5)] The claim about the critical current density decreasing with Mo thickness up to 4 nm should be referenced more clearly to the supplemental section, since the main-text series only goes up to y = 2 nm.
[Comparison with CoGd/CuOx (Fig. S10a)] The statement that the damping-like field in Mo/CoGd is more than 4 times that of CoGd/CuOx should be explained in the main text, as the reader cannot evaluate the significance without details of the comparison sample and measurement conditions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the switching data, loop-shift torques, and harmonic-Hall signals are direct measurements, and the orbital Hall parameters are imported from independent prior work rather than fitted in this paper.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is: (1) Mo generates an orbital Hall current, with the magnitude and sign of the orbital Hall effect taken from prior first-principles and transport literature (refs 5-11), not fitted here; (2) CoGd converts the orbital current into a spin current, supported by prior work on ferrimagnets (refs 12, 13, 38); (3) the z-polarized torque is inferred from measured hysteresis-loop shifts (ΔHz) and harmonic Hall signals (Fig. 3d-f), with η_z = ΔHz/Je being a direct measurement, not a predicted quantity; (4) the planar Hall effect is used as a probe of in-plane symmetry breaking, and the Mo-thickness and CoGd-thickness trends correlate PHE with η_z. That correlation is not an identity: the PHE is an equilibrium magnetotransport anisotropy, whereas η_z is a current-induced effective field, so using one to attribute the other is a mechanistic interpretation rather than a circular reduction. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing claim is justified by a self-citation: refs 28 and 29 are cited only for alloy preparation details, and ref 37 (the same group's arXiv preprint) is not used as evidence for the present mechanism. The absence of a direct measurement of the orbital Hall conductivity in this specific stack and the lack of a specified global in-plane symmetry axis are evidentiary weaknesses, but they are correctness risks, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims depend on prior literature for the orbital Hall effect magnitude and the conversion mechanism. No new entities are postulated. The sample thicknesses are varied as design parameters rather than fitted to force a result, so no free parameters in the fitting sense are introduced.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Molybdenum has a large orbital Hall conductivity and small spin Hall conductivity.
Assumed from refs 5,6,8-11; not directly measured in this stack.
domain assumption CoGd converts incoming orbital currents into spin currents via strong spin-orbit coupling.
Assumed from refs 38,39 and the observation of efficient switching; no direct orbital-to-spin conversion measurement is reported.
domain assumption The enhanced planar Hall effect indicates in-plane symmetry breaking at the Mo/CoGd interface.
Interpretation follows ref 45; the PHE is a magnetotransport signature, not a direct symmetry probe.
domain assumption Harmonic Hall analysis yields the damping-like and field-like effective fields.
Standard technique in spin-orbit torque studies, assuming a single-harmonic response; not independently calibrated here.
domain assumption Opposite switching polarity at 20 K and 300 K reflects reversal of net moment across the compensation temperature.
Standard ferrimagnet behavior, supported by the anomalous Hall hysteresis loops in Fig. 1.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Orbital Hall Effect Enables Field-Free Magnetization Reversal in Ferrimagnets without Additional Conversion Layer." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QSABAYBY

@misc{pith2026250607608,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Orbital Hall Effect Enables Field-Free Magnetization Reversal in Ferrimagnets without Additional Conversion Layer},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QSABAYBY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.07608}
}

read the original abstract

The spin Hall effect (SHE) enables efficient electrical manipulation of magnetization through the spin Hall current \left(\mathbit{J}_{\mathbit{SHE}}\right), advancing energy-efficient spintronics. In parallel, the orbital Hall effect (OHE) offers an alternative pathway to SHE for converting charge current into an angular momentum flow. In this study, we demonstrate field-free current-induced perpendicular ferrimagnetic deterministic switching within a Mo/CoGd device without an additional orbital-to-spin conversion layer. This is achieved by harnessing localized orbital Hall currents \left(\mathbit{J}_{\mathbit{OHE}}\right) generated in the Mo layer. The in-plane symmetry breaking at the Mo/CoGd surface-interface layer, validated by a pronounced planar Hall effect, gives rise to a substantial unconventional z-polarized damping-like torque. The CoGd serves a dual role: not only as a converter that transforms the significant \mathbit{J}_{\mathbit{OHE}} into \mathbit{J}_{\mathbit{SHE}} but also as a ferrimagnetic self-switching mechanism. This dual functionality enables highly efficient field-free current-induced magnetization switching with a critical current density as low as \mathbf{2}.\mathbf{51}\ \times{\mathbf{10}}^\mathbf{6} A cm-2. Our work highlights the potential of orbital Hall currents for energy-efficient magnetization switching, making a notable contribution to the burgeoning field of orbitronics.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

[1]

Liu, L. et al. Current-induced switching of perpendicularly magnetized magnetic layers using spin torque from the spin hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 096602 (2012)

work page 2012
[2]

Liu, L. et al. Spin–torque switching with the giant spin Hall effect of tantalum. Science 336, 555 (2012)

work page 2012
[3]

Miron, I. M. et al . Current -driven spin torque induced by the Rashba effect in a ferromagnetic metal layer. Nat. Mater. 9, 230 (2010)

work page 2010
[4]

Miron, I. M. et al. Perpendicular switching of a single ferromagnetic layer induced by in-plane current injection. Nature 476, 189 (2011)

work page 2011
[5]

Go, D. Lee, H. - W. Orbital torque: Torque generation by orbital current injection. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013177 (2020)

work page 2020
[6]

Lee, D. et al. Orbital torque in magnetic bilayers, Nat. Commun. 12, 6710 (2021)

work page 2021
[7]

Go, D., Lee, H.– W., Oppeneer, P. M. et al. First-principles calculation of orbital Hall effect by Wannier interpolation: Role of orbital dependence of the anomalous position. Phys. Rev. B 109, 174435 (2024)

work page 2024
[8]

Tanaka, T., Kontani, H., Naito, M. et al . Intrinsic spin Hall effect and orbital Hall effect in 4d and 5d transition metals, Phys. Rev. B 77, 165117 (2008)

work page 2008

Show all 45 references

[9]

Kontani, H., Tanaka, T. et al . Giant Orbital Hall Effect in Transition Metals: Origin of Large Spin and Anomalous Hall Effects. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 016601 (2009)

2009
[10]

Go, D., Jo, D., Gao, T. et al. Orbital Rashba effect in a surface-oxidized Cu film. Phys. Rev. B 103, L121113 (2021)

2021
[11]

G., Jo, D

Choi, Y. G., Jo, D. et al . Observation of the orbital Hall effect in a light metal Ti. Nature 619, 52 (2023). 13

2023
[12]

Lee, S., Kang, M. - G. et al. Efficient conversion of orbital Hall current to spin current for spin-orbit torque switching. Commun. Phys. 4, 234 (2021)

2021
[13]

Giant orbital Hall effect and orbital -to-spin conversion in 3d, 5d, and 4f metallic heterostructures

Sala, G., Gambardella, P. Giant orbital Hall effect and orbital -to-spin conversion in 3d, 5d, and 4f metallic heterostructures. Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 033037 (2022)

2022
[14]

Yang, Y., Wang, P., Chen, J. et al. Orbital torque switching in perpendicularly magnetized materials. Nat. Commun 15, 8645 (2024)

2024
[15]

A spin -orbit torque switching scheme with collinear magnetic easy axis and current configuration

Fukami, S., Anekawa , T. A spin -orbit torque switching scheme with collinear magnetic easy axis and current configuration. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 621 (2016)

2016
[16]

G., Li, M., Hageman, S., & Chien, C

Wang, W. G., Li, M., Hageman, S., & Chien, C. L. Electric -field-assisted switching in magnetic tunnel junctions. Nat. Mater. 11, 64 (2012)

2012
[17]

Yu, G. et al . Switching of perpendicular magnetization by spin- orbit torques in the absence of external magnetic fields. Nat. Nanotech. 9, 548–554 (2014)

2014
[18]

Cai, K., Yang, M., Ju, H. et al. Electric Field Control of Deterministic Current-Induced Magnetization Switching in a Hybrid Ferromagnetic/Ferroelectric Structure, Nat. Mater. 16, 712 (2017)

2017
[19]

Current-Induced Spin- Orbit Torque and Field -Free Switching in Mo - Based Magnetic Heterostructures

Chen, T.- Y. Current-Induced Spin- Orbit Torque and Field -Free Switching in Mo - Based Magnetic Heterostructures. Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 044038 (2018)

2018
[20]

Cao, Y., Sheng, Y. et al. Deterministic Magnetization Switching Using Lateral Spin- Orbit Torque. Adv. Mater. 32, 1907929 (2020)

2020
[21]

C., Betto, D., Rode, K

Lau, Y. C., Betto, D., Rode, K. et al . Spin-orbit torque switching without an external field using interlayer exchange coupling. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 758 (2016)

2016
[22]

Sheng, Y., Edmonds, K. W. et al. Adjustable current-induced magnetization switching utilizing interlayer exchange coupling. Adv. Electron. Mater. 4, 1800224 (2018). 14

2018
[23]

A., Lan, X., Meng, K

Bekele, Z. A., Lan, X., Meng, K. K. and Liu, X. Enhanced field- free current-induced magnetization switching by interlayer exchange coupling with insulating spacer layer. J. Appl. Phys. 127, 113902 (2020)

2020
[24]

Magnetization switching by spin-orbit torque in an antiferromagnet- ferromagnet bilayer system

Fukami, S., et al. Magnetization switching by spin-orbit torque in an antiferromagnet- ferromagnet bilayer system. Nat. Mater. 15, 535 (2016)

2016
[25]

Oh, Y. W. et al. Field-free switching of perpendicular magnetization through spin - orbit torque in antiferromagnet/ferromagnet/oxide structures. Nat. Nanotechnol . 11, 878–884 (2016)

2016
[26]

Xue, F., Lin, SJ., Song, M. et al. Field-free spin-orbit torque switching assisted by in- plane unconventional spin torque in ultrathin [Pt/Co]N. Nat. Commun 14, 3932 (2023)

2023
[27]

Ma, Q., Li, Y., Gopman, D. B. et al. Switching a Perpendicular Ferromagnetic Layer by Competing Spin Currents. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 117703 (2018)

2018
[28]

A., Liu, X., Cao, Y

Bekele, Z. A., Liu, X., Cao, Y. & Wang, K. High- Efficiency Spin -Orbit Torque Switching Using a Single Heavy- Metal Alloy with Opposite Spin Hall Angles. Adv. Electron. Mater. 7, 2000793 (2020)

2020
[29]

Bekele, Z. A. et al . Tuning the High- Efficiency Field -Free Current -Induced Deterministic Switching via Ultrathin PtMo Layer with Mo Content. Adv. Electron. Mater. 7, 2100528 (2021)

2021
[30]

Humphries, A. M. et al. Observation of spin-orbit effects with spin rotation symmetry. Nat. Commun. 8, 911 (2017)

2017
[31]

P., Zemen, J

Amin, V. P., Zemen, J. & Stiles, M. D. Interface -generated spin currents. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 136805 (2018). 15

2018
[32]

Baek, S. C. et al. Spin currents and spin-orbit torques in ferromagnetic trilayers. Nat. Mater. 17, 509 (2018)

2018
[33]

Go, D., Freimuth, F. et al . Theory of current -induced angular momentum transfer dynamics in spin-orbit coupled systems, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 033401 (2020)

2020
[34]

Liu, L., Zhou, C., Shu, X. et al . Symmetry -dependent field -free switching of perpendicular magnetization. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 277 (2021)

2021
[35]

Xie, Q., Lin, W., Sarkar, S. et al . Field-free magnetization switching induced by the unconventional spin-orbit torque from WTe2, APL Mater. 9, 051114 (2021)

2021
[36]

Mahendra, D. C. et al. Observation of anti-damping spin-orbit torques generated by in-plane and out-of-plane spin polarizations in MnPd3. Nat. Mater. 22, 591 (2023)

2023
[37]

A., Jiang, Y.- Y., Lei, K

Bekele, Z. A., Jiang, Y.- Y., Lei, K. et al . Field-free switching of perpendicular magnetization by cooperation of planar Hall and orbital Hall effects. arXiv:2404.13405

arXiv
[38]

Ding, S., Kang, M.– G., Legrand, W. et al. Orbital torque in rare-earth transition-metal ferrimagnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 236702 (2024)

2024
[39]

Bläsing, R., Ma, T., Yang, SH. et al. Exchange coupling torque in ferrimagnetic Co/Gd bilayer maximized near angular momentum compensation temperature. Nat. Commun 9, 4984 (2018)

2018
[40]

& Hanazono, M

Imagawa, T., Narishige, S. & Hanazono, M. Magnetic properties of co- based amorphous films. IEEE Transl. J. Magn. Japan 2, 471–472 (1987)

1987
[41]

Jiang, X., Gao, L. et al . Temperature Dependence of Current-Induced Magnetization Switching in Spin Valves with a Ferrimagnetic CoGd Free Layer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 217202 (2006). 16

2006
[42]

Wu, H., Nance, J. et al . Chiral symmetry breaking for deterministic switching of perpendicular magnetization by spin-orbit torque. Nano Lett. 21, 515-521 (2021)

2021
[43]

Zheng, Z., Zhang, Y., Lopez -Dominguez, V. et al . Field-free spin -orbit torque - induced switching of perpendicular magnetization in a ferrimagnetic layer with a vertical composition gradient. Nat. Commun 12, 4555 (2021)

2021
[44]

Liang, Y., Yi, D., Nan, T. et al. Field-free spin -orbit switching of perpendicular magnetization enabled by dislocation- induced in- plane symmetry breaking. Nat . Commun 14, 5458 (2023)

2023
[45]

Wang, H., Huang, Y.– X., Liu, H. et al. Orbital origin of the intrinsic planar Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 056301 (2024)

2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Liu, L. et al. Current-induced switching of perpendicularly magnetized magnetic layers using spin torque from the spin hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 096602 (2012)

work page 2012

[2] [2]

Liu, L. et al. Spin–torque switching with the giant spin Hall effect of tantalum. Science 336, 555 (2012)

work page 2012

[3] [3]

Miron, I. M. et al . Current -driven spin torque induced by the Rashba effect in a ferromagnetic metal layer. Nat. Mater. 9, 230 (2010)

work page 2010

[4] [4]

Miron, I. M. et al. Perpendicular switching of a single ferromagnetic layer induced by in-plane current injection. Nature 476, 189 (2011)

work page 2011

[5] [5]

Go, D. Lee, H. - W. Orbital torque: Torque generation by orbital current injection. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013177 (2020)

work page 2020

[6] [6]

Lee, D. et al. Orbital torque in magnetic bilayers, Nat. Commun. 12, 6710 (2021)

work page 2021

[7] [7]

Go, D., Lee, H.– W., Oppeneer, P. M. et al. First-principles calculation of orbital Hall effect by Wannier interpolation: Role of orbital dependence of the anomalous position. Phys. Rev. B 109, 174435 (2024)

work page 2024

[8] [8]

Tanaka, T., Kontani, H., Naito, M. et al . Intrinsic spin Hall effect and orbital Hall effect in 4d and 5d transition metals, Phys. Rev. B 77, 165117 (2008)

work page 2008