Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 93 references

Boundary dynamics of Maxwell-invariant three-dimensional Chern-Simons gravity

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Maxwell-invariant Chern-Simons gravity induces a Maxwellian flat-Liouville boundary theory, derived both by bulk reduction and by coadjoint orbits.

desk verdict Clean derivation of a new Maxwellian boundary action for 3D Maxwell Chern-Simons gravity, with a real gap in the coadjoint-orbit cross-check that should be pinned down before publication. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.07651 v1 pith:YTCWUKIA submitted 2025-06-09 hep-th

Felix Höfenstock , Patricio Salgado-Rebolledo This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords MaxwellalgebraChern-SimonsgravityflatLiouvilletheoryBMS3boundarydynamicscoadjointorbitsCarrollianexpansionasymptoticsymmetries
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that the boundary dynamics of three-dimensional Chern-Simons gravity invariant under the Maxwell algebra is a specific two-dimensional field theory: a Maxwellian extension of the flat Liouville theory. The derivation runs from the bulk gravitational action, through a chiral Wess-Zumino-Witten model, to a reduced boundary action (Eq. 4.41) after imposing asymptotically flat boundary conditions. The same boundary action is obtained independently from the geometric action on coadjoint orbits of the centrally extended Maxwell-BMS3 group, and it emerges as the next term in a Carrollian expansion of the boundary dual of AdS3 Chern-Simons gravity. A sympathetic reader should care because this gives a concrete holographic boundary dual for a minimal deformation of Poincaré symmetry and a laboratory for post-Carrollian corrections.

What carries the argument

The machinery has three load-bearing pieces. First, the Maxwell3 algebra extends the Poincaré algebra by a third generator $Z_a$ with $[P_a,P_b]=\epsilon_{cab}Z_c$, and carries a three-parameter invariant bilinear form (2.13) with couplings $\kappa_1$, $\kappa_2$, and $\kappa_3$. Second, the boundary connection $\alpha$ of Eq. (3.11) depends on three functions $M$, $T$, and $Y$ of $\phi$; imposing its form and the partial gauge $\partial_\phi A_r=0$ on the chiral WZW model produces the boundary action (4.41). Third, the orbit method: the geometric action on coadjoint orbits of the Maxwell-BMS3 group, evaluated on the representative $S_0=(0,c_1,0,c_2,0,c_3)$ and supplemented with the Hamiltonian (4.65), reproduces the same action, with the central charges related by $c_i=48\pi\kappa_i$.

What would settle it

Compute the Dirac brackets of the charges $J$, $P$, and $Z$ directly from the boundary action (4.41) with generic periodic data and compare with the Maxwell-BMS3 algebra (3.19); if the central terms differ from $c_i=48\pi\kappa_i$, the claimed equivalence between the bulk asymptotic algebra and the boundary theory fails. Alternatively, repeat the reduction with a different coadjoint orbit representative and check whether the resulting action is still equivalent to (4.41) up to local field redefinitions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the bulk Maxwell3-invariant Chern-Simons action, after Hamiltonian reduction and imposition of the boundary conditions of Ref. [59], reduces to the two-dimensional action (4.41), which the authors call the Maxwellian boundary dual. This action extends flat Liouville theory by coupling three boundary fields $\varphi$, $\xi$, and $\chi$ with couplings $\kappa_1$, $\kappa_2$, and $\kappa_3$, and its charges realize the centrally extended Maxwell-BMS3 algebra (3.19). The same action, up to a Hamiltonian deformation, is the geometric action on coadjoint orbits of the Maxwell-BMS3 group (Eq. 4.66), and it can also be obtained as a Carrollian expansion of the AdS3 boundary dual when the exotic gravitational term is included. The upshot is that Maxwell symmetry at the boundary is not a separate construction but a specific member of the family of geometric actions associated with the centrally extended Maxwell-BMS3 group.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the chosen boundary conditions, namely the boundary connection (3.11) together with the partial gauge $\partial_\phi A_r=0$, describe all allowed asymptotically flat boundary dynamics for this theory; if equally valid boundary conditions lead to different dynamics, the derived action would not be the canonical boundary dual.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The asymptotic symmetry algebra of Maxwell3 Chern-Simons gravity, the centrally extended Maxwell-BMS3 algebra, is realized as the Poisson algebra of conserved charges of the boundary field theory (4.41).
  • The boundary dual is a specific Maxwellian extension of flat Liouville theory, so existing techniques for Liouville and BMS3-invariant theories can be applied directly to it.
  • The same action follows both from bulk reduction and from coadjoint orbits of the Maxwell-BMS3 group, so the two routes are equivalent descriptions of a single boundary theory.
  • In the Carrollian expansion of the AdS3 boundary dual, the flat Liouville term appears at order $c^0$ and the Maxwellian extension appears as order-$c$ and $c^2$ corrections, placing Maxwell symmetry at the level of post-Carrollian corrections.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: The boundary action (4.41) is derived for one specific representative of the coadjoint orbit; the paper leaves open whether other representatives give genuinely different boundary theories or simply field redefinitions of the same one.
  • Editorial inference: Because the Carrollian expansion is truncated at order $c^2$, a natural testable extension is to push the expansion higher; one would expect further Maxwell-like extensions with additional central charges to appear, with corresponding deformations of the bulk Chern-Simons theory.
  • Editorial inference: The AdS-Lorentz counterpart mentioned in the outlook suggests a three-chiral-boson boundary dual whose flat limit is the Maxwellian boundary dual; verifying this would place the Maxwell boundary theory in a family of deformations interpolating between AdS and flat results.
  • Editorial inference: Interpreting the boundary fields through the spinning-particle picture of Section 2.2 may make the Maxwellian boundary action a practical arena for post-Carrollian particle models, since the extra coordinates act as Lagrange multipliers enforcing a constant field strength.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a two-dimensional boundary theory for three-dimensional Chern-Simons gravity invariant under the Maxwell algebra. Starting from the bulk Chern-Simons action, the authors perform a Hamiltonian reduction to a Maxwell-invariant chiral Wess-Zumino-Witten model and then impose the boundary conditions of Ref. [59], obtaining the action (4.41), which they interpret as a Maxwellian extension of flat Liouville theory. They then attempt to reproduce this same action as a geometric action on coadjoint orbits of the centrally extended Maxwell-BMS3 group, using a specific orbit representative and adding a Hamiltonian term. Finally, they show that the boundary actions for Poincaré and Maxwell invariance arise from a Carrollian expansion of the AdS3 boundary dual. The central bulk-to-boundary reduction is presented in detail, with explicit field redefinitions, charges, and symmetry checks.

Significance. If the main claim holds, the paper provides a concrete and nontrivial example of a boundary dual for a deformed Poincaré Chern-Simons theory, with a clear connection to post-Carrollian corrections. The explicit reduction from the bulk action to (4.41) is a valuable result, and the paper includes explicit computations of charges, algebras, and symmetry transformations. The orbit-method and Carrollian derivations are more conditional and need qualification, but the bulk-to-boundary construction appears sound and is likely to be useful for further work on flat and Carrollian holography.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 4.2, Eqs. (4.53) and (4.66)] The claim that the geometric action on coadjoint orbits of Maxwell-BMS3 reproduces the Maxwellian boundary dual (4.41) is established only for the orbit representative S0=(0,c1,0,c2,0,c3). The text asserts that the omitted Diff(S1) representatives s0, p0, and \tilde p0 "can be absorbed into the part of the action associated with a representative of the form (4.53) by allowing the fields to have nontrivial periodicity conditions," citing Ref. [70] for BMS3. This absorption is not demonstrated for Maxwell-BMS3, and the BMS3 argument does not automatically extend: the coadjoint representation (2.26b) contains the nonlinear term (1/2)(ad*_a)^2 \tilde p, and the group law (2.26a) mixes \tilde v with v through (1/2) ad_v Ad_U w. A nonzero \tilde p0 therefore couples nonlinearly to the dynamical fields, so a periodicity-shift argument is not sufficient. Since Eq. (4.66) is the basis for the abstract claim that the same theory is obtained from coadjoint orbits, the authors should either prove the absorption for Maxwell-BMS3 or explicitly restrict the claim to the orbit (4.53). If absorption fails, additional terms depending on s0, p0, and \tilde p0 would appear and cannot be removed by the Hamiltonian (4.65), which is independent of these parameters.
  2. [Sec. 4.2, Eqs. (4.54) and (4.56)] The derivation of the geometric action in the form (4.56) from the general formula (2.33) is not shown. Formula (2.33) was derived for matrix groups in Sec. 2.2, and the replacement (4.52) for the Virasoro group involves a nontrivial central extension. The steps leading from (2.33) to (4.56), including the handling of the central elements c1, c2, c3 and the pairings (4.50), should be presented or at least sketched, because the equivalence between (4.54) and (4.56) is used in the field redefinition that yields the kinetic term (4.58).
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 4.1, text after Eq. (4.41)] The sentence "The κ2 extension arises completely from the Maxwell extension of the Poincaré algebra" appears to be a typo: the κ2 term is the flat Liouville model of Ref. [23], whereas the genuinely Maxwellian extension is the κ3 term. Please correct this wording.
  2. [Sec. 4.1, Eqs. (4.14)-(4.17)] The connection α is defined as the triplet (e,ω,σ) in Eq. (4.14), but the components displayed in Eq. (4.17), such as αu=(0, λ^{-1}λ', λ^{-1}β'λ), are ordered as if α=(ω,e,σ). Please clarify the ordering convention and the identifications used in Eq. (4.15).
  3. [Sec. 4.4, Eq. (4.86)] The passage from the expansion (4.85) to Eq. (4.86) uses integration by parts: for example, terms proportional to \dot ζ1 ζ0' are combined with \dot ζ0 ζ1' to give 2ζ1' \dot ζ0 up to total derivatives. The text should state that the identification holds up to total derivatives in u and φ.
  4. [Sec. 4.4, Eq. (4.79)] The field redefinition (4.79) involves the relation σ'=e^{φ}, which is nonlocal in φ unless boundary conditions are specified. A brief comment on the domain and boundary conditions for σ would help readers follow the equivalence with the flat Liouville action.
  5. [Throughout] There are several language slips, for example "we need to extended geometric action" in the paragraph before Eq. (4.66), and a duplicated "from" in the discussion around Eq. (4.27). A careful proofread is recommended.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the bulk-to-boundary reduction, the coadjoint-orbit matching, and the Carrollian expansion are independent computations; the self-citations are auxiliary rather than load-bearing.

full rationale

The central boundary action (4.41) is obtained by explicit Hamiltonian reduction of the Maxwell3 Chern-Simons action: solving the constraints F_ij=0, imposing the partial gauge ∂_ϕ A_r=0, solving the boundary term (4.18), and reducing the chiral WZW action (4.19) under the boundary conditions (3.11). Each step is a direct calculation; no field or parameter is defined as the target action. The alternative orbit derivation evaluates the geometric action (4.54) for a fixed representative (4.53), rewrites it via the field redefinitions (4.57), and adds the Hamiltonian (4.65) obtained from the conserved charge Q[0,-1,0]; the equality with (4.41) is a computed matching, not an identity by construction. The Carrollian expansion in Section 4.4 independently recovers (4.41) from the AdS3 boundary action through the identifications (4.87). Self-citations to [59] for the boundary conditions, [66] for the geometric-action formula, and [70] for the absorption of Diff(S1) representatives are used as inputs or simplifications; the bulk-to-boundary result does not reduce to them. The unproven absorption statement in Section 4.2 is a completeness gap for generic orbits — and the paper itself qualifies the equivalence to 'a specific class of orbit representatives' — but it is not a circular reduction of the main derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles, forces, or dimensions. Its only free structural input is the triple of invariant couplings (κ1, κ2, κ3) that define the Maxwell3 Chern-Simons theory, plus the choice of boundary conditions and gauge fixing. The analysis is a derivation within a known framework, so the axiom ledger is dominated by modeling assumptions about boundary conditions rather than invented entities.

free parameters (2)
  • κ1, κ2, κ3 (coupling constants of the Maxwell3 invariant bilinear form) = not specified (arbitrary real constants imposing non-degeneracy)
    These parameters multiply the three invariant terms in the bilinear form (2.13) and hence the three contributions to the boundary action (4.41). They are not fitted to data, but they are free parameters of the model; the physical content of the Maxwellian boundary dual depends on their relative values.
  • ν (Liouville-field rescaling constant), μ (Liouville potential parameter) = arbitrary
    These enter the map between Liouville theory and the boundary action (4.79), and are chosen for convenience in the Carrollian-limit analysis. They do not affect the final structural identification.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The Maxwell3-invariant Chern-Simons connection A (3.11) is a valid boundary condition for asymptotically flat Maxwell3 gravity.
    The entire boundary reduction rests on this choice of α, inherited from the asymptotic symmetry analysis of [59]. The paper does not prove that these boundary conditions are the most general or the physically preferred ones.
  • domain assumption The gauge condition ∂ϕAr = 0, so that G(u, r, ϕ) = g(u, ϕ)h(u, r), is admissible and does not miss degrees of freedom.
    This is a standard partial gauge fixing for the Chern-Simons reduction (as in [19,79]), but it is not derived from first principles for the Maxwell3 case, and it restricts the solution space.
  • domain assumption The radial dependence is encoded in a field-independent group element h with ħ = 0, so that Au = h^{-1} α_u h.
    This is stated in Section 4 for the BMS gauge solutions; it is not proven to hold for all solutions of the Maxwell3 field equations. It is needed to obtain the boundary WZW action and the final boundary dual.
  • standard math The standard Regge-Teitelboim charge formula δQ[ε] = 2 ∫ dϕ ⟨ε δA_ϕ⟩ and its Dirac-bracket relation give the asymptotic symmetry algebra.
    This is the standard Hamiltonian analysis of Chern-Simons theory, as used in [79], and is a well-established method.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Boundary dynamics of Maxwell-invariant three-dimensional Chern-Simons gravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YTCWUKIA

@misc{pith2026250607651,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Boundary dynamics of Maxwell-invariant three-dimensional Chern-Simons gravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YTCWUKIA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.07651}
}
abstract

We construct a two-dimensional dual field theory induced at the boundary of three-dimensional Chern-Simons gravity invariant under the Maxwell algebra. The resulting action takes the form of a Maxwellian extension of the flat Liouville theory known from the analysis of asymptotically flat three-dimensional gravity. This boundary theory is derived by reducing the bulk gravitational action to a Maxwell-invariant chiral Wess-Zumino-Witten model and imposing boundary conditions compatible with asymptotically flat geometries. Alternatively, we obtain the same theory as the geometric action on coadjoint orbits of the Maxwell extension of the BMS$_3$ group. Finally, we show how the boundary actions corresponding to both Poincar\'e and Maxwell invariance emerge from a Carrollian expansion of the boundary theory dual to AdS$_3$ Chern-Simons gravity.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [70]

    Barnich, H.A

    G. Barnich, H.A. Gonzalez and P. Salgado-Rebolledo,Geometric actions for three-dimensional gravity, Class. Quant. Grav.35 (2018) 014003 [1707.08887]

    arXiv 2018

  2. [59]

    Asymptotic symmetries of three-dimensional Chern-Simons gravity for the Maxwell algebra

    P. Concha, N. Merino, O. Miskovic, E. Rodríguez, P. Salgado-Rebolledo and O. Valdivia, Asymptotic symmetries of three-dimensional Chern-Simons gravity for the Maxwell algebra, JHEP 10 (2018) 079 [1805.08834]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  3. [1]

    Maldacena,The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Adv

    J.M. Maldacena,The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2 (1998) 231 [hep-th/9711200]

    arXiv 1998

  4. [2]

    Strominger,The dS / CFT correspondence, JHEP 10 (2001) 034 [hep-th/0106113]

    A. Strominger,The dS / CFT correspondence, JHEP 10 (2001) 034 [hep-th/0106113]

    arXiv 2001

  5. [3]

    Guica, T

    M. Guica, T. Hartman, W. Song and A. Strominger,The Kerr/CFT Correspondence, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 124008 [0809.4266]

    arXiv 2009

  6. [4]

    Kachru, X

    S. Kachru, X. Liu and M. Mulligan,Gravity duals of Lifshitz-like fixed points, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 106005 [0808.1725]

    arXiv 2008

  7. [5]

    Balasubramanian and J

    K. Balasubramanian and J. McGreevy,Gravity duals for non-relativistic CFTs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 061601 [0804.4053]

    arXiv 2008

  8. [6]

    Son,Toward an AdS/cold atoms correspondence: A Geometric realization of the Schrodinger symmetry, Phys

    D.T. Son,Toward an AdS/cold atoms correspondence: A Geometric realization of the Schrodinger symmetry, Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 046003 [0804.3972]

    arXiv 2008

Show all 93 references
  1. [7]

    Bagchi,Correspondence between Asymptotically Flat Spacetimes and Nonrelativistic Conformal Field Theories, Phys

    A. Bagchi,Correspondence between Asymptotically Flat Spacetimes and Nonrelativistic Conformal Field Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.105 (2010) 171601 [1006.3354]

    2010 arXiv

  2. [8]

    Barnich and C

    G. Barnich and C. Troessaert,Symmetries of asymptotically flat 4 dimensional spacetimes at null infinity revisited, Phys. Rev. Lett.105 (2010) 111103 [0909.2617]

    2010 arXiv

  3. [9]

    Barnich and C

    G. Barnich and C. Troessaert,Aspects of the BMS/CFT correspondence, JHEP 05 (2010) 062 [1001.1541]

    2010 arXiv

  4. [10]

    Bagchi, S

    A. Bagchi, S. Detournay and D. Grumiller,Flat-Space Chiral Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett.109 (2012) 151301 [1208.1658]. – 25 –

    2012 arXiv

  5. [11]

    Strominger,Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory(3, 2017), [1703.05448]

    A. Strominger,Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory(3, 2017), [1703.05448]

    2017 arXiv

  6. [12]

    Pasterski, S.-H

    S. Pasterski, S.-H. Shao and A. Strominger,Flat Space Amplitudes and Conformal Symmetry of the Celestial Sphere, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017) 065026 [1701.00049]

    2017 arXiv

  7. [13]

    Adamo, L

    T. Adamo, L. Mason and A. Sharma,Celestial amplitudes and conformal soft theorems, Class. Quant. Grav.36 (2019) 205018 [1905.09224]

    2019 arXiv

  8. [14]

    Donnay, S

    L. Donnay, S. Pasterski and A. Puhm,Asymptotic Symmetries and Celestial CFT, JHEP 09 (2020) 176 [2005.08990]

    2020 arXiv

  9. [15]

    Donnay, A

    L. Donnay, A. Fiorucci, Y. Herfray and R. Ruzziconi,Carrollian Perspective on Celestial Holography, Phys. Rev. Lett.129 (2022) 071602 [2202.04702]

    2022 arXiv

  10. [16]

    Bagchi, S

    A. Bagchi, S. Banerjee, R. Basu and S. Dutta,Scattering Amplitudes: Celestial and Carrollian, Phys. Rev. Lett.128 (2022) 241601 [2202.08438]

    2022 arXiv

  11. [17]

    Brown and M

    J.D. Brown and M. Henneaux,Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity, Commun. Math. Phys.104 (1986) 207

    1986

  12. [18]

    Strominger,Black hole entropy from near horizon microstates, JHEP 02 (1998) 009 [hep-th/9712251]

    A. Strominger,Black hole entropy from near horizon microstates, JHEP 02 (1998) 009 [hep-th/9712251]

    1998 arXiv

  13. [19]

    Coussaert, M

    O. Coussaert, M. Henneaux and P. van Driel,The Asymptotic dynamics of three-dimensional Einstein gravity with a negative cosmological constant, Class. Quant. Grav.12 (1995) 2961 [gr-qc/9506019]

    1995 arXiv

  14. [20]

    Barnich and G

    G. Barnich and G. Compere,Classical central extension for asymptotic symmetries at null infinity in three spacetime dimensions, Class. Quant. Grav.24 (2007) F15 [gr-qc/0610130]

    2007 arXiv

  15. [21]

    Barnich,Entropy of three-dimensional asymptotically flat cosmological solutions, JHEP 10 (2012) 095 [1208.4371]

    G. Barnich,Entropy of three-dimensional asymptotically flat cosmological solutions, JHEP 10 (2012) 095 [1208.4371]

    2012 arXiv

  16. [22]

    Barnich and H.A

    G. Barnich and H.A. Gonzalez,Dual dynamics of three dimensional asymptotically flat Einstein gravity at null infinity, JHEP 05 (2013) 016 [1303.1075]

    2013 arXiv

  17. [23]

    Barnich, A

    G. Barnich, A. Gomberoff and H.A. González,Three-dimensional Bondi-Metzner-Sachs invariant two-dimensional field theories as the flat limit of Liouville theory, Phys. Rev. D87 (2013) 124032 [1210.0731]

    2013 arXiv

  18. [24]

    Henneaux and P

    M. Henneaux and P. Salgado-Rebolledo,Carroll contractions of Lorentz-invariant theories, JHEP 11 (2021) 180 [2109.06708]

    2021 arXiv

  19. [25]

    Duval, G.W

    C. Duval, G.W. Gibbons and P.A. Horvathy,Conformal Carroll groups and BMS symmetry, Class. Quant. Grav.31 (2014) 092001 [1402.5894]

    2014 arXiv

  20. [26]

    Campoleoni, H.A

    A. Campoleoni, H.A. Gonzalez, B. Oblak and M. Riegler,BMS Modules in Three Dimensions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A31 (2016) 1650068 [1603.03812]

    2016 arXiv

  21. [27]

    Henneaux and S.-J

    M. Henneaux and S.-J. Rey,Nonlinear Winf inityas Asymptotic Symmetry of Three-Dimensional Higher Spin Anti-de Sitter Gravity, JHEP 12 (2010) 007 [1008.4579]

    2010 arXiv

  22. [28]

    Campoleoni, S

    A. Campoleoni, S. Fredenhagen, S. Pfenninger and S. Theisen,Asymptotic symmetries of three-dimensional gravity coupled to higher-spin fields, JHEP 11 (2010) 007 [1008.4744]

    2010 arXiv

  23. [29]

    Schrader,The Maxwell Group and the Quantum Theory of Particles in Classical Homogeneous Electromagnetic Fields, Fortsch

    R. Schrader,The Maxwell Group and the Quantum Theory of Particles in Classical Homogeneous Electromagnetic Fields, Fortsch. Phys. 20 (1972) 701. – 26 –

    1972

  24. [30]

    Bacry, P

    H. Bacry, P. Combe and J.L. Richard,Group-theoretical analysis of elementary particles in an external electromagnetic field. 1. the relativistic particle in a constant and uniform field, Nuovo Cim. A67 (1970) 267

    1970

  25. [31]

    Hoogland,Minimal electromagnetic coupling in elementary quantum mechanics: a group theoretical derivation, J

    H. Hoogland,Minimal electromagnetic coupling in elementary quantum mechanics: a group theoretical derivation, J. Phys. A11 (1978) 797

    1978

  26. [32]

    Beckers and V

    J. Beckers and V. Hussin,Minimal electromagnetic coupling schemes. II. Relativistic and nonrelativistic Maxwell groups, J. Math. Phys.24 (1983) 1295

    1983

  27. [33]

    Negro and M.A

    J. Negro and M.A. del Olmo,Local realizations of kinematical groups with a constant electromagnetic field. I. The relativistic case, Journal of mathematical physics31 (1990) 568

    1990

  28. [34]

    de Azcarraga, K

    J.A. de Azcarraga, K. Kamimura and J. Lukierski,Generalized cosmological term from Maxwell symmetries, Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 124036 [1012.4402]

    2011 arXiv

  29. [35]

    de Azcarraga, K

    J.A. de Azcarraga, K. Kamimura and J. Lukierski,Maxwell symmetries and some applications, Int. J. Mod. Phys. Conf. Ser.23 (2013) 01160 [1201.2850]

    2013 arXiv

  30. [36]

    Soroka and V.A

    D.V. Soroka and V.A. Soroka,Tensor extension of the Poincare’ algebra, Phys. Lett. B607 (2005) 302 [hep-th/0410012]

    2005 arXiv

  31. [37]

    Gomis, K

    J. Gomis, K. Kamimura and J. Lukierski,Deformations of Maxwell algebra and their Dynamical Realizations, JHEP 08 (2009) 039 [0906.4464]

    2009 arXiv

  32. [38]

    Gibbons, J

    G.W. Gibbons, J. Gomis and C.N. Pope,Deforming the Maxwell-Sim Algebra, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 065002 [0910.3220]

    2010 arXiv

  33. [39]

    Khasanov and S

    O. Khasanov and S. Kuperstein,(In)finite extensions of algebras from their Inonu-Wigner contractions, J. Phys. A44 (2011) 475202 [1103.3447]

    2011 arXiv

  34. [40]

    Salgado,Non-linear realizations and invariant action principles in higher gauge theory, Nucl

    S. Salgado,Non-linear realizations and invariant action principles in higher gauge theory, Nucl. Phys. B 1013 (2025) 116858 [2312.08285]

    2025 arXiv

  35. [41]

    de Azcarraga, J.M

    J.A. de Azcarraga, J.M. Izquierdo, M. Picon and O. Varela,Expansions of algebras and superalgebras and some applications, Int. J. Theor. Phys.46 (2007) 2738 [hep-th/0703017]

    2007 arXiv

  36. [42]

    Bonanos and J

    S. Bonanos and J. Gomis,Infinite Sequence of Poincare Group Extensions: Structure and Dynamics, J. Phys. A43 (2010) 015201 [0812.4140]

    2010 arXiv

  37. [43]

    Peñafiel and L

    D.M. Peñafiel and L. Ravera,Infinite S-Expansion with Ideal Subtraction and Some Applications, J. Math. Phys.58 (2017) 081701 [1611.05812]

    2017 arXiv

  38. [44]

    Gomis and A

    J. Gomis and A. Kleinschmidt,On free Lie algebras and particles in electro-magnetic fields, JHEP 07 (2017) 085 [1705.05854]

    2017 arXiv

  39. [45]

    Gomis, A

    J. Gomis, A. Kleinschmidt, D. Roest and P. Salgado-Rebolledo,A free Lie algebra approach to curvature corrections to flat space-time, JHEP 09 (2020) 068 [2006.11102]

    2020 arXiv

  40. [46]

    Edelstein, M

    J.D. Edelstein, M. Hassaine, R. Troncoso and J. Zanelli,Lie-algebra expansions, Chern-Simons theories and the Einstein-Hilbert Lagrangian, Phys. Lett. B640 (2006) 278 [hep-th/0605174]

    2006 arXiv

  41. [47]

    Izaurieta, E

    F. Izaurieta, E. Rodriguez, P. Minning, P. Salgado and A. Perez,Standard General Relativity from Chern-Simons Gravity, Phys. Lett. B678 (2009) 213 [0905.2187]

    2009 arXiv

  42. [48]

    Durka and J

    R. Durka and J. Kowalski-Glikman,Local Maxwell symmetry and gravity, 1110.6812

    arXiv

  43. [49]

    Salgado and S

    P. Salgado and S. Salgado,sopD´ 1, 1qb sopD´ 1, 2q algebras and gravity, Phys. Lett. B 728 (2014) 5. – 27 –

    2014

  44. [50]

    Concha, D.M

    P.K. Concha, D.M. Peñafiel, E.K. Rodríguez and P. Salgado,Even-dimensional General Relativity from Born-Infeld gravity, Phys. Lett. B725 (2013) 419 [1309.0062]

    2013 arXiv

  45. [51]

    Concha, D.M

    P.K. Concha, D.M. Peñafiel, E.K. Rodríguez and P. Salgado,Generalized Poincaré algebras and Lovelock-Cartan gravity theory, Phys. Lett. B742 (2015) 310 [1405.7078]

    2015 arXiv

  46. [52]

    González, P

    N. González, P. Salgado, G. Rubio and S. Salgado,Einstein–Hilbert action with cosmological term from Chern–Simons gravity, J. Geom. Phys.86 (2014) 339 [1605.00325]

    2014 arXiv

  47. [53]

    Avilés, J

    L. Avilés, J. Diaz, D.M. Penafiel, V.C. Orozco and P. Salgado,Einstein gravity with generalized cosmological term from five-dimensional AdS-Maxwell-Chern-Simons gravity, JHEP 05 (2024) 160 [2208.06113]

    2024 arXiv

  48. [54]

    Cangemi,One formulation for both lineal gravities through a dimensional reduction, Phys

    D. Cangemi,One formulation for both lineal gravities through a dimensional reduction, Phys. Lett. B 297 (1992) 261 [gr-qc/9207004]

    1992 arXiv

  49. [55]

    Duval, Z

    C. Duval, Z. Horvath and P.A. Horvathy,Chern-Simons gravity, based on a non-semisimple group, 0807.0977

    arXiv

  50. [56]

    Cangemi and R

    D. Cangemi and R. Jackiw,Gauge invariant formulations of lineal gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992) 233 [hep-th/9203056]

    1992 arXiv

  51. [57]

    Afshar, H.A

    H. Afshar, H.A. González, D. Grumiller and D. Vassilevich,Flat space holography and the complex Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. D101 (2020) 086024 [1911.05739]

    2020 arXiv

  52. [58]

    Hoseinzadeh and A

    S. Hoseinzadeh and A. Rezaei-Aghdam,(2`1)-dimensional gravity from Maxwell and semisimple extension of the Poincaré gauge symmetric models, Phys. Rev. D90 (2014) 084008 [1402.0320]

    2014 arXiv

  53. [60]

    Palumbo,Geometric Model of Topological Insulators from the Maxwell Algebra, Annals Phys

    G. Palumbo,Geometric Model of Topological Insulators from the Maxwell Algebra, Annals Phys. 386 (2017) 15 [1610.04734]

    2017 arXiv

  54. [61]

    Gomis and A

    J. Gomis and A. Kleinschmidt,Infinite-Dimensional Algebras as Extensions of Kinematic Algebras, Front. in Phys.10 (2022) 892812 [2202.05026]

    2022 arXiv

  55. [62]

    Gomis, A

    J. Gomis, A. Kleinschmidt, J. Palmkvist and P. Salgado-Rebolledo, Newton-Hooke/Carrollian expansions of (A)dS and Chern-Simons gravity, JHEP 02 (2020) 009 [1912.07564]

    2020 arXiv

  56. [63]

    Hansen, N.A

    D. Hansen, N.A. Obers, G. Oling and B.T. Søgaard,Carroll Expansion of General Relativity, SciPost Phys. 13 (2022) 055 [2112.12684]

    2022 arXiv

  57. [64]

    Ecker, D

    F. Ecker, D. Grumiller and P. Salgado-Rebolledo,Postcarrollian gravity, in24th Hellenic School and Workshops on Elementary Particle Physics and Gravity, 4, 2025 [2504.16162]

    2025 arXiv

  58. [65]

    Witten,(2+1)-Dimensional Gravity as an Exactly Soluble System, Nucl

    E. Witten,(2+1)-Dimensional Gravity as an Exactly Soluble System, Nucl. Phys. B 311 (1988) 46

    1988

  59. [66]

    Salgado-Rebolledo,The Maxwell group in 2+1 dimensions and its infinite-dimensional enhancements, JHEP 10 (2019) 039 [1905.09421]

    P. Salgado-Rebolledo,The Maxwell group in 2+1 dimensions and its infinite-dimensional enhancements, JHEP 10 (2019) 039 [1905.09421]

    2019 arXiv

  60. [67]

    Barnich and B

    G. Barnich and B. Oblak,Notes on the BMS group in three dimensions: I. Induced representations, JHEP 06 (2014) 129 [1403.5803]

    2014 arXiv

  61. [68]

    Alekseev and S.L

    A. Alekseev and S.L. Shatashvili,Path Integral Quantization of the Coadjoint Orbits of the Virasoro Group and 2D Gravity, Nucl. Phys. B 323 (1989) 719. – 28 –

    1989

  62. [69]

    Aratyn, E

    H. Aratyn, E. Nissimov, S. Pacheva and A.H. Zimerman,Symplectic actions on coadjoint orbits, Phys. Lett. B240 (1990) 127

    1990

  63. [71]

    Henneaux, W

    M. Henneaux, W. Merbis and A. Ranjbar,Asymptotic dynamics of AdS3 gravity with two asymptotic regions, JHEP 03 (2020) 064 [1912.09465]

    2020 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Merbis and M

    W. Merbis and M. Riegler,Geometric actions and flat space holography, JHEP 02 (2020) 125 [1912.08207]

    2020 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Merbis, T

    W. Merbis, T. Neogi and A. Ranjbar,Asymptotic dynamics of three dimensional supergravity and higher spin gravity revisited, JHEP 06 (2023) 121 [2304.06761]

    2023 arXiv

  66. [74]

    de Sousa Gerbert,On spin and (quantum) gravity in (2+1)-dimensions, Nucl

    P. de Sousa Gerbert,On spin and (quantum) gravity in (2+1)-dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 346 (1990) 440

    1990

  67. [75]

    Barnich, L

    G. Barnich, L. Donnay, J. Matulich and R. Troncoso,Asymptotic symmetries and dynamics of three-dimensional flat supergravity, JHEP 08 (2014) 071 [1407.4275]

    2014 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Grumiller, W

    D. Grumiller, W. Merbis and M. Riegler,Most general flat space boundary conditions in three-dimensional Einstein gravity, Class. Quant. Grav.34 (2017) 184001 [1704.07419]

    2017 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Banados,Three-dimensional quantum geometry and black holes, AIP Conf

    M. Banados,Three-dimensional quantum geometry and black holes, AIP Conf. Proc.484 (1999) 147 [hep-th/9901148]

    1999 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Regge and C

    T. Regge and C. Teitelboim,Role of Surface Integrals in the Hamiltonian Formulation of General Relativity, Annals Phys. 88 (1974) 286

    1974

  71. [79]

    Banados,Global charges in Chern-Simons field theory and the (2+1) black hole, Phys

    M. Banados,Global charges in Chern-Simons field theory and the (2+1) black hole, Phys. Rev. D 52 (1996) 5816 [hep-th/9405171]

    1996 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Caroca, P

    R. Caroca, P. Concha, E. Rodríguez and P. Salgado-Rebolledo,Generalizing the bms3 and 2D-conformal algebras by expanding the Virasoro algebra, Eur. Phys. J. C78 (2018) 262 [1707.07209]

    2018 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Grumiller and M

    D. Grumiller and M. Riegler,Most general AdS3 boundary conditions, JHEP 10 (2016) 023 [1608.01308]

    2016 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Barnich, L

    G. Barnich, L. Donnay, J. Matulich and R. Troncoso,Super-BMS3 invariant boundary theory from three-dimensional flat supergravity, JHEP 01 (2017) 029 [1510.08824]

    2017 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Witten,Coadjoint Orbits of the Virasoro Group, Commun

    E. Witten,Coadjoint Orbits of the Virasoro Group, Commun. Math. Phys.114 (1988) 1

    1988

  76. [84]

    Barnich and B

    G. Barnich and B. Oblak,Notes on the BMS group in three dimensions: II. Coadjoint representation, JHEP 03 (2015) 033 [1502.00010]

    2015 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Oblak,Berry Phases on Virasoro Orbits, JHEP 10 (2017) 114 [1703.06142]

    B. Oblak,Berry Phases on Virasoro Orbits, JHEP 10 (2017) 114 [1703.06142]

    2017 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Gervais and A

    J.-L. Gervais and A. Neveu,Dual String Spectrum in Polyakov’s Quantization. 2. Mode Separation, Nucl. Phys. B 209 (1982) 125

    1982

  79. [87]

    Henneaux, L

    M. Henneaux, L. Maoz and A. Schwimmer,Asymptotic dynamics and asymptotic symmetries of three-dimensional extended AdS supergravity, Annals Phys. 282 (2000) 31 [hep-th/9910013]

    2000 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Concha, J

    P. Concha, J. Matulich, D. Pino and E. Rodríguez,Asymptotic structure of three-dimensional Maxwell Chern-Simons gravity coupled to spin-3 fields, JHEP 02 (2025) 148 [2412.04992]. – 29 –

    2025 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Caroca, P

    R. Caroca, P. Concha, O. Fierro, E. Rodríguez and P. Salgado-Rebolledo,Generalized Chern–Simons higher-spin gravity theories in three dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 934 (2018) 240 [1712.09975]

    2018 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Gonzalez and M

    H.A. Gonzalez and M. Pino,Boundary dynamics of asymptotically flat 3D gravity coupled to higher spin fields, JHEP 05 (2014) 127 [1403.4898]

    2014 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Afshar, A

    H. Afshar, A. Bagchi, R. Fareghbal, D. Grumiller and J. Rosseel,Spin-3 Gravity in Three-Dimensional Flat Space, Phys. Rev. Lett.111 (2013) 121603 [1307.4768]

    2013 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Gonzalez, J

    H.A. Gonzalez, J. Matulich, M. Pino and R. Troncoso,Asymptotically flat spacetimes in three-dimensional higher spin gravity, JHEP 09 (2013) 016 [1307.5651]

    2013 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Concha, N

    P. Concha, N. Merino, E. Rodríguez, P. Salgado-Rebolledo and O. Valdivia,Semi-simple enlargement of thebms3 algebra from asop2, 2q‘ sop2, 1q Chern-Simons theory, JHEP 02 (2019) 002 [1810.12256]. – 30 –

    2019 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.