Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 38 references

Detection and manipulation of surface electric field noise of hexagonal boron nitride

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that the double-quantum spin relaxation of shallow boron-vacancy defects in hexagonal boron nitride is dominated by surface electric-field noise, revealed by depth-dependent power-law behavior and suppression by PMMA and…

desk verdict A useful first demonstration of surface electric-field noise in hBN via DQ relaxation, with a practical PMMA passivation result, but the quantitative noise numbers lean on an uncalibrated susceptibility and the concentration-independence claim is weaker than stated. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.07734 v1 pith:5X5VX7IZ submitted 2025-06-09 quant-ph

Hao-Jie Zhou , Xiao-Wen Shen , Yu Zhou , Lei Dong , Pei-Qin Chen , Xia Chen , Guang-Wei Deng , Gang Xiang
show 4 more authors
Pei-Jie Guo Tian-Ke Wang Hong-Peng Wu Jun-Feng Wang
This is my paper
classification quant-ph
keywords hexagonalboronnitridevacancydefectdouble-quantumrelaxationsurfaceelectricfieldnoiseopticallydetectedmagneticresonancequantumsensingspincoherencePMMApassivation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to establish that the rapid spin relaxation of shallow boron-vacancy ($V_B^-$) defects in hexagonal boron nitride is governed by electric-field noise from the surface, not by magnetic noise or defect-defect interactions. It reaches this conclusion by measuring the double-quantum (DQ) relaxation rate $\gamma$ with a pulse sequence that isolates the $|+1\rangle \leftrightarrow |-1\rangle$ channel, and showing that $\gamma$ follows a depth-dependent power law in the ODMR splitting frequency, is independent of defect concentration, rises with temperature, and is suppressed when the surface is capped with PMMA or glycerol. If the claim holds, surface engineering rather than defect-density control becomes the key lever for improving coherence in hBN quantum sensors.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the DQ relaxation channel between $|+1\rangle$ and $|-1\rangle$, measured by the sequence in Fig. 1C and fitted with $F_2 = r e^{-(2\gamma + \Omega)\tau}$; because this channel is taken to be sensitive only to electric-field noise, while the SQ channel is magnetic-noise sensitive, the excess of $\gamma$ over the bulk value $\gamma_\infty$ is converted to a noise spectral density through $S_{E_\perp} = (\gamma - \gamma_\infty)/(d_\perp/h)^2$ with susceptibility $d_\perp/h = 0.4$ Hz m/V. The depth-controlled defect ensembles and the capping layers are the experimental handles that test whether this surface term is the dominant one.

What would settle it

Apply a known static electric field to a small ensemble of $V_B^-$ defects and measure the shift of the DQ ODMR splitting to obtain $d_\perp/h$ directly; if the value is far from 0.4 Hz m/V, the absolute noise levels in this paper rescale. Alternatively, deposit a magnetic film with controlled spin density on hBN and check whether $\gamma$ stays flat; if the DQ relaxation responds to magnetic noise, the DQ channel is not purely electric-field sensitive and the central attribution fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the DQ relaxation rate $\gamma$ of shallow $V_B^-$ defects in hBN is dominated by surface electric-field noise. Measurements at depths 4.8, 9.2, and 14.5 nm show $\gamma$ decreasing with depth and fitting $\gamma \sim 1/(f-2E)^a + \gamma_\infty$, with shallower defects giving larger inferred noise spectral density $S_{E_\perp}$. $\gamma$ is unchanged when the implantation dose spans $2\times10^{13}$ to $4\times10^{15}$ cm$^{-2}$, ruling out concentration-driven relaxation. Over 296 K to 453 K, $\gamma$ grows with $1/T_1 \propto T^{2.44}$. Capping with PMMA suppresses the inferred noise by 46.7% on average and glycerol by 31.8%, with the power-law frequency dependence preserved.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim collapses if the double-quantum transition is not purely electric-field sensitive or if the NV-derived susceptibility of 0.4 Hz m/V does not apply to $V_B^-$ in hBN, because then the inferred surface noise spectra are not what the paper says they are.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Coherence of shallow $V_B^-$ sensors should improve mainly by passivating or dielectrically engineering the hBN surface, not by diluting defect density.
  • Defect ensembles can be made dense for stronger fluorescence without paying an additional relaxation penalty.
  • The corrected definition $1/T_1 = 3\Omega + \gamma$ should replace $1/T_1^{(0)} = 3\Omega$ when comparing $T_1$ data across hBN samples and temperatures.
  • Above room temperature, phonon-assisted relaxation grows steeply ($T^{2.44}$), so thermal operation of hBN sensors will degrade sensitivity unless the surface electric-field contribution is separately suppressed.
  • PMMA capping offers a practical route to cut surface electric-field noise by roughly half, directly extending shallow-defect sensing capabilities in hBN.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension is that the same DQ relaxation protocol could act as a local probe of surface charge dynamics, adsorbate motion, or surface phonons in hBN and other 2D materials, not just as a noise characterization tool.
  • The inferred noise intensities all scale with the assumed susceptibility of 0.4 Hz m/V borrowed from NV centers; a direct measurement of $V_B^-$'s transverse electric-field susceptibility would either confirm the absolute noise levels or rescale them.
  • Because PMMA's suppression does not fade at large splittings as it does in shallow NV centers, the dominant surface noise in hBN may differ in origin from diamond, possibly involving phonons rather than charge fluctuators; thickness-dependent capping experiments could test this.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports double-quantum (DQ) spin relaxation measurements of shallow boron-vacancy (VB-) ensembles in hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) as a function of magnetic field, implantation depth, implantation dose, temperature, and dielectric capping layers. The authors interpret the DQ relaxation rate γ as dominated by surface electric-field noise, using the NV-inspired formula S_E⊥ = (γ − γ∞)/(d⊥/h)^2 with d⊥/h = 0.4 Hz m/V taken from Ref. 27. They report a depth-dependent power-law frequency dependence of γ, an apparent independence of γ from defect concentration, a temperature dependence 1/T1 ∝ T^2.44, and reductions of the inferred electric-field noise by 46.7% (PMMA) and 31.8% (glycerol). The central claim is that these observations establish surface electric-field noise as the dominant relaxation channel for shallow VB- defects in hBN.

Significance. If the central attribution holds, the paper would provide the first systematic characterization of surface electric-field noise in hBN spin defects, a relevant gap given the use of shallow VB- centers for quantum sensing. The main strengths are the direct application of an established DQ relaxation protocol, the inclusion of depth, dose, temperature, and capping-layer comparisons, and the reporting of statistical error bars on the fitted rates. The capping experiments in particular give falsifiable, practically useful results. However, the quantitative claims depend on a susceptibility value transferred from prior work without in-situ calibration, and the concentration-independence evidence is weakened by the paper's own observation that the PL signal saturates above an implantation dose of 2×10^14 cm^-2. These issues are load-bearing for the central claims and require revision.

major comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 3 and the paragraph 'Having established the critical role...'] The concentration-independence claim is not supported by the data as presented. The manuscript states that the VB- PL saturates and slightly decreases for implantation doses above 2×10^14 cm^-2, yet the γ measurements shown in Fig. 3 use doses of 2×10^13, 1×10^15, and 4×10^15 cm^-2. If the defect concentration saturates near 2×10^14 cm^-2, the two highest doses may correspond to nearly identical actual VB- densities, so the observed constancy of γ does not demonstrate independence from concentration. Please measure γ for several doses below and around the saturation threshold, and provide a direct measure of the relative defect concentration (e.g., PL or ODMR contrast) for each sample, or revise the claim to state independence only over the accessible fluence range.
  2. [Eq. (7), Figs. 2D and 5C] All absolute electric-field noise intensities are computed using the transverse susceptibility d⊥/h = 0.4 Hz m/V from Ref. 27 without any in-situ calibration on the present samples. Because S_E⊥ scales as 1/(d⊥/h)^2, any error in transferring this value directly changes the absolute noise values in Fig. 2D and the noise spectra in Fig. 5C. The relative depth trends and the suppression percentages are unaffected by this common factor, but the quantitative claim of 'detection' of surface electric-field noise is not self-contained. Please either add a calibration measurement of d⊥/h on the studied hBN samples or provide an explicit, quantitative discussion of the uncertainty introduced by using the literature value.
  3. [Introduction, Fig. 1B, and the interpretation around Eq. (7)] The central attribution of the DQ relaxation rate to electric-field noise rests on the assumption, inherited from NV-center work, that DQ transitions respond only to electric-field noise while magnetic and strain contributions are negligible. In hBN, strain and electric fields couple to the same transverse zero-field-splitting parameter E, and shallow-ion implantation creates depth-dependent strain gradients. A transverse strain-noise mechanism could in principle reproduce the observed depth trend and power-law frequency dependence. The capping-layer experiments provide supporting evidence but do not fully exclude such a mechanism, since PMMA and glycerol could also modify surface stress. A concrete control—for example, calibrating the transverse susceptibility with a known applied electric field, or comparing samples with different surface terminations—would substantially strengthen the attribution.
  4. [Fig. 2C and the fit function γ = 1/(f−2E)^a + γ∞] The fits that underlie the central power-law claim are not documented in sufficient detail. The text never reports the fitted values of a, E, or γ∞, nor their uncertainties, for any depth, temperature, or capping condition. These values are needed to verify that the power-law form is appropriate, to compute S_E⊥ via Eq. (7), and to assess whether γ∞ (the bulk contribution) is well constrained. Please include a table of all fit parameters, the definition of f used for each magnetic-field setting, and the procedure for propagating fit uncertainties into S_E⊥.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and Fig. 5C text] There are several typographical issues in the abstract ('offer' appears as 'off er') and in the Fig. 5C discussion ('effectively can effectively reduce'); please proofread carefully.
  2. [Equations] Equation numbering skips from (4) to (7). Renumber the equations or include the missing intermediate equations so that the cross-references in the text are unambiguous.
  3. [Fig. 3 caption and axis labels] The text and caption refer to 'defect concentrations' while the experiment varies implantation dose. Please specify the axis as implantation fluence or provide a measured concentration scale, and make clear which quantity is shown in Fig. 3C and 3D.
  4. [Fig. 4D inset] The log-log inset showing 1/T1 ∝ T^2.44 should include the data points with error bars, the fit range (296–453 K), and the number of points; without these, the fitted slope cannot be independently checked.
  5. [References] Reference 8 is missing the publication year (Nat. Mater. 23, 1379–1385, 2024). Please check all references for completeness.
  6. [Methods] The Methods section describes only the sample and setup; it should include the pulse-sequence parameters (microwave pulse lengths, laser power, integration times) and the fitting procedure used to extract Ω and γ, including how the amplitudes r and the background are treated.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the reported measurements are new, and the key conversions rely on external calibrations rather than on the paper's own conclusions.

full rationale

This paper is an experimental study of DQ spin relaxation in shallow VB- defects in hBN, and its derivation chain is not circular. The central measured quantity, the DQ relaxation rate gamma, is extracted from decay curves using rate equations (Eqs. 2 and 3), which are standard and do not presuppose the surface-electric-field-noise interpretation. The conversion to a noise spectral density S_E_perp = (gamma - gamma_infinity)/(d_perp/h)^2 (Eq. 7) uses a transverse susceptibility d_perp/h = 0.4 Hz m/V taken from Ref. 27, an external measurement on hBN, and the functional form 1/(f - 2E)^a + gamma_infinity is imported from NV-center work (Refs. 23-25). These are external assumptions and calibrations, not quantities defined in terms of the paper's own conclusions. The depth dependence, concentration independence, temperature dependence, and PMMA/glycerol suppression are independent experimental observations; none is a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The claim that DQ relaxation is dominated by surface electric-field noise depends on the transferability of the NV-based DQ/SQ noise model and on the literature susceptibility to hBN, but that is a validity assumption rather than a circular derivation. No self-citation chain or definitional equivalence forces the central result. The paper does not contain a passage where an output is identical to an input by construction, so no circularity is found.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central experimental claims depend on a chain of assumptions inherited from NV-center work (DQ/SQ sensitivity assignments, noise spectral formulas) and on SRIM-simulated depths. No new entities, particles, or forces are postulated. The concentration-independence conclusion is weakened by the acknowledged saturation of the defect PL with implantation dose.

free parameters (3)
  • γ∞ (bulk relaxation contribution) = not reported numerically
    Fitted as the saturation value of γ at high magnetic fields (Fig. 2C), attributed to bulk effects; its value is not tabulated.
  • Power-law exponent a in γ = 1/(f-2E)^a + γ∞ = not reported
    Fit to the DQ relaxation data at each depth and magnetic field; the exponent is never quoted, yet the abstract emphasizes a 'depth-related power-law dependence.'
  • Temperature exponent in 1/T1 ∝ T^n = n = 2.44
    Obtained from a linear fit to a log-log plot of 3Ω + γ versus T using three temperature points (296 K, approximately 373 K, and 453 K). The uncertainty in the slope is not given.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Ground-state spin Hamiltonian for VB− with S=1, Dgs ≈ 3.48 GHz, Egs ≈ 48-75 MHz (Eq. 1)
    Used to model energy levels and ODMR splitting; parameters are taken from prior work and not measured here.
  • domain assumption DQ relaxation is sensitive to electric field noise, SQ to magnetic field noise (Fig. 1B)
    Inherited from NV-center studies (Refs 23-25); no direct electric-field measurement is made to validate this for hBN.
  • domain assumption Rate-equation model with complete relaxation in a three-level system (Eqs. 2, 3)
    Assumes exponential decay forms F1 = r e^{-3Ωτ} and F2 = r e^{-(2γ+Ω)τ}.
  • domain assumption SRIM-simulated defect depths (4.8, 9.2, 14.5 nm) correspond to actual VB− depths
    No direct depth measurement (e.g., via cross-section or single-defect imaging) is reported.
  • domain assumption Implantation dose is a proxy for VB− concentration
    The paper acknowledges PL saturates above 2×10^14 /cm^2, yet uses doses up to 4×10^15 /cm^2 to conclude concentration independence.
  • domain assumption Surface electric field noise spectrum follows a power-law and the conversion SE⊥ = (γ-γ∞)/(d⊥/h)^2
    Formula taken from Refs 23,24 and susceptibility d⊥/h = 0.4 Hz m/V from Ref 27.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Detection and manipulation of surface electric field noise of hexagonal boron nitride." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5X5VX7IZ

@misc{pith2026250607734,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Detection and manipulation of surface electric field noise of hexagonal boron nitride},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5X5VX7IZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.07734}
}
read the original abstract

Hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) spin defects off er transformative potential for quantum sensing through atomic-scale proximity to target samples, yet their performance is fundamentally limited by rapid coherence loss. While magnetic noise mechanisms have been extensively studied, another critical infl uence from surface electric fi eld noise remains unexplored in hBN systems. Here,we address this challenge and systematically investigate surface electric fi eld noise in hBN using shallow boron vacancy defects. The double-quantum spin relaxation behavior in response to magnetic fi elds and defect depths is examined, revealing that the relaxation rate follows a distinctive depth-related power-law dependence of ODMR splitting frequency. The relaxation is also demonstrated to be independent of the defect concentrations. Furthermore, the temperature dependence of the relaxation rate is investigated, showing a noticeable rise as the temperature increases from 296 K to 453 K, thus highlighting the infl uence of thermal eff ects on spin relaxation. To further suppress surface electric fi eld noise, we explore the eff ectiveness of passivation materials, including glycerol and PMMA. Notably, PMMA is more effi cient in mitigating surface electric fi eld noise. These experiments enhance the understanding of surface electric fi eld noise in hBN and provide a foundation for developing noise mitigation strategies in future research.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.07734 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic and pulse sequences of detection of surface electric field noise [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Depths dependence property of the DQ relaxation. (A) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. DQ relaxation dynamics with varying defect concentrations. (A) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Temperature dependence of DQ relaxation rates over the range of 296 K to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Manipulation of surface electric-field noise using PMMA and glycerol covering layers. (A) Schematic of hBN covered by PMMA and glycerol covering layers, with the shallow 𝑉𝐵 − defects (d = 4.8 nm). (B) Comparison of 𝛾 with and without covering layers. Solid lines repres…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. W. Doherty, N. B. Manson, P. Delaney, F. Jelezko, J. Wrachtrup, L. C. L. Hollenberg, The nitrogen-vacancy colour centre in diamond. Phys. Rep. 528 (1), 1–45 (2013)

    work page 2013

  2. [2]

    W. F. Koehl, B. B. Buckley, F. J. Heremans, G. Calusine, D. D. Awschalom, Room temperature coherent control of defect spin qubits in silicon carbide. Nature 479 (7371), 84–87 (2011)

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    T. T. Tran, K. Bray, M. J. Ford, M. Toth, I. Aharonovich, Quantum emission from hexagonal boron nitride monolayers. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11 (1), 37–41 (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Gottscholl, M

    A. Gottscholl, M. Kianinia, V. Soltamov, S. Orlinskii, G. Mamin, C. Bradac, C. Kasper, K. Krambrock, A. Sperlich, M. Toth, I. Aharonovich, V. Dyakonov, Initialization and read-out of intrinsic spin defects in a van der Waals crystal at room temperature. Nat. Mater. 19 (5), 540–545 (2020)

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Wolfowicz, F

    G. Wolfowicz, F. J. Heremans, C. P. Anderson, S. Kanai, H. Seo, A. Gali, G. Galli, D. D. Awschalom, Quantum guidelines for solid-state spin defects. Nat. Rev. Mater. 6 (10), 906–925 (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Vaidya, X

    S. Vaidya, X. -Y. Gao, S. Dikshit, I. Aharonovich, T. -C. Li, Quantum sensing and imaging with spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride. Adv. Phys. -X 8 (1), 2206049 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    H.-H. Fang, X. -J. Wang, X. Marie, H. -B. Sun, Quantum sensing with optically accessible spin defects in van der Waals layered materials. Light-Sci. Appl. 13 (1), 303 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    H. L. Stern, C. M. Gilardoni, Q. Gu, S. E. Barker, O. F. J. Powell, X. Deng, S. A. Fraser, L, Follet, A. J. Ramsey, H. H. Tan, I. Aharonovich, M. Ata üre, A quantum coherent spin in hexagonal boron nitride at ambient conditions. Nat. Mater. 23 (10), 1379–1385

    work page

Show all 38 references
  1. [9]

    W. Liu, V. Ivá dy, Z.-P. Li, Y.-Z. Yang, S. Yu, Y. Meng, Z.-A. Wang, N.-J. Guo, F.- F. Yan, Q. Li, J. -F. Wang, J.-S. Xu, X. Liu, Z. -Q. Zhou, Y. Dong, X. -D. Chen, F.-W. Sun, Y.-T. Wang, J.-S. Tang, A. Gali, C.-F. Li, G.-C, Guo, Coherent dynamics of multi- spin VB- center in ...

    2022

  2. [10]

    Gao, B.-Y

    X.-Y. Gao, B.-Y. Jiang, A. E. L. Allcca, K.-H. Shen, M. A. Sadi, A. B. Solanki, P. Ju, Z.-J. Xu, P. Upadhyaya, Y. P. Chen, S. A. Bhave, T.-C. Li, High-contrast plasmonic- enhanced shallow spin defects in hexagonal bor on nitride for quantum sensing. Nano Lett. 21 (18), 7708–77...

    2021

  3. [11]

    H.-B. Cai, S. -R. Ru, Z. -Z, Jiang, J. J. H. Eng, R. -H. He, F. -L. Li, Y. -S. Miao, J. Zú ñ iga-Pé rez, W.-B. Gao, Spin defects in hBN assisted by metallic nanotrenches for quantum sensing. Nano Lett. 23 (11), 4991–4996 (2023)

    2023

  4. [12]

    Sortino, A

    L. Sortino, A. Gale, L. K ühner, C. Li, J. Biechteler, F. J. Wendisch, M. Kianinia, H.-R. Ren, M. Toth, S. A. Maier, I. Aharonovich, A. Tittl, Optically addressable spin defects coupled to bound states in the conti nuum metasurfaces. Nat. Commun. 15 (1), 2008 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    X.-Y. Gao, S. Vaidya, K.-J. Li, P. Ju, B.-Y. Jiang, Z.-J. Xu, A. E. L. Allcca, K.-H. Shen, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, S. A. Bhave, Y. P. Chen, Y. Peng, T.-C. Li, Nuclear spin polarization and control in hexagonal boron nitride. Nat. Mater. 21 (9), 1024– 1028 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    Ru, Z.-Z

    S.-H. Ru, Z.-Z. Jiang, H.-D. Liang, J. Kenny, H.-B. Cai, X.-D. Lyu, R. Cernansky, F.-F. Zhou, Y.-Z. Yang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguch, F. -L. Li, T. S. Koh, X. -G. Liu, F. Jelezko, A. A. Bettiol, W. -B. Gao, Robust nuclear spin polarization via ground -state level anticrossing of...

    2024

  7. [15]

    Gottscholl, M

    A. Gottscholl, M. Diez, V. Soltamov, C. Kasper, D. Krauß e, A. Sperlich, M. Kianinia, C. Bradac, I. Aharonovich, V. Dyakonov, Spin defects in hBN as promising temperature, pressure and magnetic field quantum sensors. Nat. Commun. 12 (1), 4480 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    Liu, Z.-P

    W. Liu, Z.-P. Li, Y.-Z. Yang, S. Yu, Y. Meng, Z.-A. Wang, Z.-C. Li, N.-J. Guo, F.- F. Yan, Q. Li, J. -F. Wang, J. -S. Xu, Y. -T. Wang, J. -S. Tang, C. -F. Li, G. -C. Guo, Temperature-dependent energy-level shifts of spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride. ACS Photonics 8 (7),...

    2021

  9. [17]

    Rizzato, M

    R. Rizzato, M. Schalk, S. Mohr, J. C. Hermann, J. P. Leibold, F. Bruckmaier, G. Salvitti, C.-J. Qian, P.-R. Ji, G. V. Astakhov, U. Kentsch, M. Helm, A. V. Stier, J. J. Finley, D. B. Bucher, Extending the coherence of spin defects in hBN enables advanced qubit control and quant...

    2023

  10. [18]

    Lyu, Q.-H, Tan, L.-S

    X.-D. Lyu, Q.-H, Tan, L.-S. Wu, C.-S. Zhang, Z.-W. Zhao, Z. Mu, J. Zúñ iga-Pérez, H.-B. Cai, W. -B. Gao, Strain quantum sensing with spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride. Nano Lett. 22 (16), 6553–6559 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    I. O. Robertson, S. C. Scholten, P. Singh, A. J. Healey, F. Meneses, P. Reineck, H. Abe, T. Ohshima, M. Kianinia, I. Aharonovich, J. Tetienne, Detection of paramagnetic spins with an ultrathin van der Waals quantum sensor. ACS Nano 17 (14), 13408 – 13417 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    X.-Y. Gao, S. Vaidya, P. Ju, S. Dikshit, Y. P. Chen, T. -C. Li, Quantum sensing of paramagnetic spins in liquids with spin qubits in hexagonal boron nitride. ACS Photonics 10 (8), 2894–2900 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    Durand, T

    A. Durand, T. Clua -Provost, F. Fabre, P. Kumar, J. Li, J. H. Edgar, P.Udvarhelyi, A. Gali, X. Marie, C. Robert, J. M. Gé rard, B. Gil, G. Cassabois, V. Jacques, Optically Active Spin Defects in Few-Layer Thick Hexagonal Boron Nitride. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (16), 116902 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    Huang, J

    M.-Q. Huang, J. -C. Zhou, D. Chen, H. -Y. Lu, N. J. McLaughlin, S. -L. Li, M. Alghamdi, D. Djugba, J. Shi, H. -L. Wang, C. R. Du, Wide field imaging of van der Waals ferromagnet Fe3GeTe2 by spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride. Nat. Commun. 13 (1), 5369 (2022)

    2022

  15. [23]

    B. A. Myers, A. Ariyaratne, A. C. B. Jayich, Double-quantum spin-relaxation limits to coherence of near -surface nitrogen -vacancy centers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (19), 197201 (2017)

    2017

  16. [24]

    Lin, C.-F

    S.-R. Lin, C.-F. Wang, J.-F. Wang, Y.-H. Guo, Y.-J. Yang, J,-X. Zhao, P.-P. Ma, Y.-P. Chen, L. -R. Lou, W. Zhu, G. -Z. Wang, Diamond surface electric -field noise detection using shallow nitrogen -vacancy centers. Phys. Rev. B 106 (16), 165406 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    M. Kim, H. J. Mamin, M. H. Sherwood, K. Ohno, D. D Awschalom, D. Rugar, Decoherence of near-surface nitrogen-vacancy centers due to electric field noise. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (8), 087602 (2015)

    2015

  18. [26]

    Gardill, M

    A. Gardill, M. C. Cambria, S. Kolkowitz, Fast relaxation on q utrit transitions of nitrogen-vacancy centers in nanodiamonds. Phys. Rev. Appl. 13 (3), 034010 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    Gong, G.-H

    R.-T. Gong, G.-H. He, X.-Y. Gao, P. Ju, Z.-Y. Liu, B.-T. Ye, E. A. Henriksen, T.- C. Li, C. Zu, Coherent dynamics of strongly interacting electronic spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride. Nat. Commun. 14 (1), 3299 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    N.-J. Guo, W. Liu, Z.-P. Li, Y.-Z. Yang, S. Yu, Y. Meng, Z.-A. Wang, X.-D. Zeng, F.-F. Yan, Q. Li, J. -F. Wang, J. -S. Xu, Y. -T. Wang, J. -S. Tang, C. -F. Li, G. -C. Guo, Generation of spin defects by ion implantation in hexagonal boron nitride. ACS Omega 7 (2), 1733–1739 (2022)

    2022

  21. [29]

    M. C. Cambria, A. Gardill, Y. Li, A. Norambuena, J. R. Maze, S. Kolkowitz, State- dependent phonon-limited spin relaxation of nitrogen-vacancy centers. Phys. Rev. Res. 3 (1), 013123 (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    Gottscholl, M

    A. Gottscholl, M. Diez, V. Soltamov, C. Kasper, A. Sperlich, M. Kianinia, C. Bradac, I. Aharonovich, V. Dyakonov, Room temperature coherent control of spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride. Sci. Adv. 7 (14), eabf3630 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    Clua -Provost, Z

    T. Clua -Provost, Z. Mu, A. Durand, C. Schrader, J. Happacher, J. Bocquel, P. Maletinsky, J. Fraunié, X. Marie, C. Robert, G. Seine, E. Janzen, J. H. Edgar, B. Gil, G. Cassabois, V. Jacques, Spin-dependent photodynamics of boron-vacancy centers in hexagonal boron nitride. Phys...

    2024

  24. [32]

    R. Li, F. Kong, P.-J. Zhao, Z. Cheng, Z.-Y. Qin, M.-Q. Wang, Q. Zhang, P.-F. Wang, Y. Wang, F. -Z. Shi, J. -F. Du, Nanoscale Electrometry Based on a Magnetic -Field- Resistant Spin Sensor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (24), 247701 (2020)

    2020

  25. [33]

    Romach1, C

    Y. Romach1, C. Müller, T. Unden, L. J. Rogers, T. Isoda, K. M. Itoh, M. Markham, A. Stacey, J. Meijer, S. Pezzagna, B. Naydenov, L. P. McGuinness, N. Bar -Gill, F. Jelezko, Spectroscopy of surface-induced noise using shallow spins in diamond. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (1), 017601 (2015)

    2015

  26. [34]

    A. J. Healey, S. C. Scholten, T. Yang, J. A. Scott, G. J. Abrahams, I. O. Robertson, X.-F. Hou, Y.-F. Guo, S. Rahman, Y. Lu, M. Kianinia, I. Aharonovich, J.-P. Tetienne, Quantum microscopy with van der Waals heterostructures. Nat. Phys. 19 (1), 87–91 (2023)

    2023

  27. [35]

    S. C. Scholten, P. Singh, A. J. Healey, I. O. Robertson, G. Haim, C. Tan, D. A. Broadway, L. Wang, H. Abe, T. Ohshima, M. Kianinia, P. Reineck, I. Aharonovich, J.- P Tetienne. Multi-species optically addressable spin defects in a van der Waals material. Nat. Commun. 15 (1), 67...

    2024

  28. [36]

    J.-F. Du, F. -Z. Shi, X. Kong, F. Jelezko, J. Wrachtrup, Single -molecule scale magnetic resonance spectroscopy using quantum diamond sensors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 96 (2), 025001 (2024)

    2024

  29. [37]

    Casola, T

    F. Casola, T. Van Der Sar, A. Yacoby, Probing condensed matter physics with magnetometry based on nitrogen -vacancy centres in diamond. Nat. Rev. Mater. 3 (1), 1–13 (2018)

    2018

  30. [38]

    W. Liu, S. Li, N.-J. Guo, X.-D. Zeng, L.-K. Xie, J.-Y . Liu, Y .-H. Ma, Y .-Q. Wu, Y .- T. Wang, Z.-A. Wang, J.-M. Ren, C. Ao, J.-S. Xu, J.-S. Tang, A. Gali, C.-F. Li, G.-C. Guo, Experimental observation of spin defects in van der Waals material GeS2. arXiv 2410.18892 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.