Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 57 references

Experiment and k$\cdot$p analysis of the luminescence from modulation-doped CdTe/(Cd,Mg)Te quantum wells at magnetic field

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A k·p band-structure model reproduces most polarization-resolved Landau-level transitions in CdTe quantum wells, and the few strong lines that escape the standard selection rules point to conduction–valence band mixing.

desk verdict A solid first k·p-based assignment of magneto-PL in CdTe/(Cd,Mg)Te QWs, but its one genuinely new claim—the relaxed selection rules—is asserted rather than computed, so the paper needs a quantitative follow-up before the central 'gap' assignment is accepted. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.07776 v1 pith:LCKDBZXL submitted 2025-06-09 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

W. Solarska , M. Grymuza , M. Kubisa , K. Ryczko , P. Pfeffer , K. P. Korona , K. Karpierz , D. Yavorskiy
show 3 more authors
Z. Adamus T. Wojtowicz J. {L}usakowski
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords CdTe/(CdMg)TequantumwellsmodulationdopingmagnetophotoluminescenceLandaulevelsk·ptheoryLuttingerHamiltonianopticalselectionruleseffectiveg-factor
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper applies full band-structure calculations to the magnetophotoluminescence of modulation-doped CdTe/(Cd,Mg)Te quantum wells, a step that had not been done for this material system. The conduction band is described by a three-level k·p model and the valence band by the Luttinger Hamiltonian, adapted to the quantum-well geometry, with a single gap parameter $E_0$ adjusted by aligning theory with experiment. The computed Landau-level energies reproduce the majority of the observed $\sigma^+$ and $\sigma^-$ transitions, including lines involving valence-band Landau levels up to index 7. The strong transitions that fall in a spectral 'gap' where no standard transition is predicted are assigned to a relaxed selection scheme activated by mixing of $S$-type conduction-band amplitudes into the valence band. Time-resolved measurements support the picture that the barrier acts as a reservoir of long-lived holes that tunnel into high-lying valence Landau levels.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by two coupled band models. The conduction band is treated with a three-level k·p (at finite field, P·p) model, so each $n_c$th Landau level is a linear combination of harmonic-oscillator functions with indices $n_c - 1$, $n_c$, $n_c + 1$ (Eqs. A5–A6). The valence band is treated with the Luttinger Hamiltonian for the $\Gamma_8$ band; each Landau level $\Psi_{n_v}$ mixes four Bloch components with oscillator indices $n_v - 1$, $n_v$, $n_v + 1$, $n_v + 2$ (Eq. 11). From these wave functions one derives the standard optical selection rules (Eq. 12). The paper's proposed enlargement of the selection rules follows from admitting $S$-type $\Gamma_c^6$ components with both spin directions into the valence-band states, which makes transitions such as $\langle S\uparrow|p_-|(X-iY)\uparrow\rangle$ allowed through coefficients $\alpha_4$ and $\beta_4$ in the conduction-band wave functions.

What would settle it

A unified $8\times 8$ k·p calculation of the conduction–valence mixing coefficients $\alpha_4$ and $\beta_4$ would settle the assignment: if those coefficients are negligible at the fields studied, the 'gap' line should be absent or much weaker than observed. Alternatively, a polarization- and field-resolved measurement of the intensity of the 'gap' transition, tracking the expected growth of the mixing with $\sqrt{\hbar\omega_c}$, would test whether the relaxed selection rules describe it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a k·p description of both bands—three-level k·p for the conduction band and Luttinger for the valence band, adapted to a quantum well with a self-consistent confining potential—reproduces the energies of the majority of polarization-resolved magnetoluminescence transitions in modulation-doped CdTe/(Cd,Mg)Te quantum wells, once a single gap parameter $E_0$ is aligned with experiment. It also claims that the strong transitions that appear in a spectral 'gap' where the standard selection rules forbid any line are explained by relaxing those rules through mixing of the conduction and valence bands: $S$-type $\Gamma_c^6$ amplitudes with both spin directions are admixed into the $\Gamma_v^8$ valence-band wave functions, making the previously forbidden matrix elements nonzero. The observation of transitions from valence Landau levels up to $n_v = 7$ is explained by time-resolved data showing that photoexcited holes from the barriers tunnel into the wells and survive for nanoseconds.

Load-bearing premise

The 'gap' explanation assumes that conduction-band-like $S$-type character is mixed into the valence-band states enough to make the missing lines bright, but the paper does not calculate the strength of that mixing.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The k·p framework, with only material parameters and a single gap $E_0$ adjusted, can serve as a predictive tool for magneto-optical transitions in other II-VI modulation-doped quantum wells.
  • Because the calculated electron $g^*$ varies with energy and field, spin splittings of higher Landau levels should not be described by a constant $g$-factor.
  • Photoexcited holes from the barrier tunnel into the wells on nanosecond timescales, explaining the population of valence Landau levels up to $n_v = 7$.
  • The enlarged selection rules predict additional $\sigma^+$/ $\sigma^-$ lines in spectral regions where the standard scheme has none, including the observed 'gap' and the low-energy side of the $n_c = 0$ transitions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the mixing strength $\alpha_4$, $\beta_4$ were calculated from a unified band model, the intensity and polarization of the 'gap' transitions could be predicted as a function of field, turning the proposed explanation into a quantitative test.
  • The same conduction–valence mixing should also modify transitions in undoped or p-type CdTe wells, so existing trion and exciton magneto-PL data could be re-examined for analogous 'forbidden' lines.
  • The energy-dependent $g^*$ implies that electron spin-splitting measurements at higher Landau levels should show a field- and index-dependent Zeeman gap, testable by spin-flip Raman or polarization-resolved PL.
  • The barrier-reservoir mechanism predicts that the intensity of high-index valence Landau lines should depend on whether the excitation is above or below the barrier band gap, which could be checked with resonant excitation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports polarization-resolved magneto-photoluminescence measurements (up to 9 T, 1.8/4.2 K) on modulation-doped CdTe/(Cd,Mg)Te quantum wells (one single well and two ten-well samples) and interprets the spectra with k·p-based band-structure calculations. The conduction band Landau levels are computed with a three-level P·p model; the valence band Landau levels are computed with a Luttinger Hamiltonian adapted to the quantum well geometry. Transition energies are compared with experiment after sliding the theoretical and experimental graphs against each other through a free energy-gap parameter E0. The authors claim that the majority of observed transitions are reproduced, while a set of strong transitions in a spectral "gap" requires an enlarged set of selection rules arising from admixture of Γc6 S-type states into the valence-band states. Additional time-resolved measurements are used to propose that barrier photoexcited holes tunnel into the wells and occupy high-index valence Landau levels, and the calculated conduction-band g-factor is compared with literature values.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper provides a valuable systematic test of k·p/Luttinger models for magneto-optical transitions in a material system where such an analysis was previously absent. The experimental dataset is careful and detailed, and the paper includes a specific g-factor calculation that matches the literature value of about -1.56, as well as time-resolved data supporting a long-lived barrier hole population. However, the main novelty—the enlarged selection rules invoked to explain the "gap" transitions—is presented as a hypothesis rather than a derivation or numerical estimate, and the quantitative comparison with experiment is weakened by the manual adjustment of E0, the absence of error bars or a statistical figure of merit, and the case-by-case exclusion of some transitions. The manuscript is therefore a solid experimental and computational contribution whose central interpretive claim needs additional quantitative support.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. IV.B, Eqs. (A5)-(A6)] The explanation of the "gap" transitions is asserted, not computed. The valence-band states actually used in the paper (Eq. 11 and Figs. 3, 5, 6, 8) contain only the Γv8 Bloch functions u3–u6, with no S-type component. The coefficients α4 and β4 in Eqs. A5-A6 quantify the Γv8/Γv7 admixture into the conduction-band wave functions, not the S admixture into the valence-band Landau levels, so citing them does not establish that matrix elements such as ⟨S↑|p−|(X−iY)↑⟩ are non-zero at any particular strength. The paper itself concedes that a quantitative treatment requires additional calculations beyond its scope (Sec. IV.B). Since the "gap" lines are described as strong transitions, an estimate of the S-admixture amplitude or of the relaxed oscillator strength is necessary to make the assignment supported rather than speculative. In addition, Eq. 11 shows that each valence Landau level contains oscillator indices nv−1, nv, nv+1, nv+2; the α4/β4 component of the nc=1 conduction state carries oscillator index 1, so the admixture would need to appear at a matching oscillator index for each nv, and this condition is not checked.
  2. [Sec. IV.A] The comparison between theory and experiment is qualitative. The energy gap E0 is a free parameter adjusted by "sliding" the theoretical and experimental graphs (Sec. IV.A), so the absolute transition energies are not predicted; the claim that "the majority of all observed transitions is well reproduced" (Abstract and Sec. V) is not supported by a quantitative measure such as an rms deviation, the number of assigned transitions, or error bars on the extracted peak positions. Without such a measure, it is difficult for the reader to judge how many lines are reproduced, how many are excluded, and whether the agreement is significantly better than a shifted rigid-band model would provide.
  3. [Sec. IV.A and Sec. IV.C] The exclusion of unpolarized transitions (open points in Figs. 5, 6, and 8) as "most probably not related to free-to-free transitions" is plausible, but it introduces a selection bias in the comparison: these points are not compared with the theory, and yet the paper uses the remaining points to claim that the majority of transitions are reproduced. I ask the authors to state explicitly how many experimental points are excluded, why each group is excluded, and to show the comparison with and without these points, or otherwise to include them in a supplementary figure with a clear caveat.
  4. [Sec. IV.B, Fig. 5] The dashed lines in Fig. 5 are said to include all possible relaxed transitions from the nc=1 conduction level to appropriate valence levels, but the text states that the energy of all possible transitions to nv=1 or nv=−2 is shown without explaining why only those final states are selected among the available valence Landau levels. This matters because the proposed mechanism must also explain why the "gap" line is strong while other relaxed transitions are not observed; otherwise the assignment remains underdetermined.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] There are numerous typographical errors, including "mangetoluminescence", "reproducede", "reacher", "selectiun rules", and "discussed in the nextsubsection". The manuscript would benefit from a careful proofreading pass.
  2. [Table III and Sec. III.A] The band-gap values in Table III are given as negative energies because the conduction-band bottom is set to zero, but this convention is introduced only later in the text; please clarify the sign convention directly at the table or in the text preceding it.
  3. [Figs. 5, 6, and 8] The captions should explain the meaning of red, black, green, dashed, and open symbols, since some of these meanings are only described in the main text and the figures are otherwise difficult to interpret on their own.
  4. [Sec. IV.D] The time-resolved data show a long-lived barrier photoluminescence component, but they do not directly demonstrate that holes from the barrier populate high-index quantum-well Landau levels; the proposed tunneling mechanism should be phrased as a plausible scenario rather than an established conclusion.
  5. [References] Reference [50] is dated 1995 but the Luttinger-Kohn paper is from 1955; please correct this. Also check the spelling of journal names, e.g., "Physca B" and "J. Condensed Matter".

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: a single global E0 offset is adjusted for the fan charts, while the relative Landau-level dispersions and the 'gap' dashed-line energies follow from the computed k.p/Luttinger spectra; the relaxed-rule mechanism is explicitly deferred, which is a support gap rather than a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The energy scale E0 is a single global offset, 'adjusted by sliding against each other the two graphs,' so it fixes the absolute position of the fan chart but does not determine the relative B-field dispersion, the level crossings, or the polarization-dependent ordering of the transitions; those come from the 3LM and Luttinger calculations with fixed literature band parameters. The core comparison is therefore a non-tautological test of the Landau-level model. The valence-band calculation is delegated to Ref. [35], a published treatment by some of the same authors for GaAs/(Ga,Al)As heterostructures; that is a reproducible external calculation rather than a uniqueness claim or an ansatz introduced solely to make the present data fit. The conduction-band g*-factor is also benchmarked against an independent measured value of -1.56 from Ref. [42]. The only flagged weakness is in Sec. IV.B: the S-admixture mechanism for the 'gap' lines is asserted ('admixture of S-type Gamma_c6 wave functions ... to the Gamma_v8 band'), and its strength is explicitly deferred ('requires additional calculations ... beyond the scope of the present paper'). This is an acknowledged support gap, not a circular step: the dashed-line energies in Fig. 5 are computed from the previously obtained Landau-level spectra with only the global E0 offset, and no parameter is fitted to the green points. The alpha4/beta4 coefficients are not adjusted to reproduce those points. The explanation may be underjustified or incomplete, but it does not reduce by construction to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central comparison rests on a chain of standard k·p inputs (band parameters, Luttinger parameters, P0, spin-orbit splitting), a global fitted energy shift E0 that absorbs the absolute band gap, and an uncalculated mixing assumption used to explain the "gap" transitions. No genuinely new physical entity is introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • E0 (energy gap corrected for confinement) = not stated; set by sliding theory onto data for each sample
    Section IV.A: "A free parameter is the energy gap E0... adjusted by sliding against each other the two graphs." Absorbs absolute energy scale; relative LL separations are model outputs.
  • 2DEG electron concentration (via self-consistent V(z)) = not stated; calculation matched transport values not shown in paper
    Section III.A: the numerical procedure gave electron concentration equal to transport measurements (not shown). This sets the confinement potential and therefore the Landau level energies.
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption Three-level k·p model and Luttinger Hamiltonian, with parameters from Refs. [47,48], accurately describe the CB and VB Landau levels in the QW.
    Section III; the central calculation treats Γc6 coupled to Γv8/Γv7 for the CB and an isolated Γv8 for the VB.
  • domain assumption Axial approximation for the Luttinger Hamiltonian is sufficient.
    Section III.B; cubic terms are not included, though Refs. [53,54] suggest they can matter for selection rules.
  • domain assumption Self-consistent Schrödinger-Poisson potential with strain neglected gives correct confinement.
    Section III.A and Fig. 1; strain effects are dropped following Refs. [7,46].
  • standard math Boundary conditions Eq. (10) (continuity of envelope and of (1/m*)∂χ/∂z) are correct.
    Standard effective-mass matching at each interface.
  • domain assumption Bychkov-Rashba spin splitting is negligible.
    Section III.A, after Eq. 7: "These terms are omitted because they are negligible."
  • domain assumption Observed peaks selected for comparison are free-to-free Landau level recombination.
    Section IV.A; unpolarized lines are excluded as bound transitions.
  • ad hoc to paper The missing "gap" transitions are enabled by Γc6 admixture into the Γv8 valence band.
    Section IV.B; proposed to explain the gap, with no computation of mixing strength; authors state a unified calculation is beyond scope.
  • ad hoc to paper Barrier holes tunnel into QWs and occupy high-nv hole Landau levels.
    Section IV.D; inferred from two-exponential decays, not directly measured hole dynamics.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Experiment and k$\cdot$p analysis of the luminescence from modulation-doped CdTe/(Cd,Mg)Te quantum wells at magnetic field." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LCKDBZXL

@misc{pith2026250607776,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Experiment and k$\cdot$p analysis of the luminescence from modulation-doped CdTe/(Cd,Mg)Te quantum wells at magnetic field},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LCKDBZXL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.07776}
}
abstract

In spite of a large quantity of papers devoted to the mangetoluminescence from CdTe/(Cd,Mg)Te, quantum wells there have been no attempts to analyze it on the basis of the band-structure calculations. This has been proposed in the present paper. Samples containing one or ten CdTe quantum wells with Cd$_{0.7}$Mg$_{0.3}$Te barriers are grown by a molecular beam epitaxy on a semi-insulating GaAs substrate. Each well is modulation-doped with iodine donors which leads to the creation of a two-dimensional electron gas in the wells. Polarization-resolved ($\sigma^+/\sigma^-$) photoluminescence spectra are measured at liquid helium temperatures and magnetic fields up to 9 T. The results are interpreted on the basis of calculations of the energy of Landau levels in the conduction and valence bands. In the latter case, we use the Luttinger Hamiltonian while the conduction band is described within a three-level k$\cdot$p model. Both models, originally formulated for bulk materials, are adapted for two-dimensional structures. We have found that the majority of all observed transitions is well reproducede by this theory. However, some strong transitions are not which allows us to propose an enlarged scheme of selection rules of the photoluminescence transitions resulting from mixing of the conduction and valence bands. We observe transitions involving Landau levels in the valence band with the index up to 7. To understand the origin of occupation with photoexcited holes of these levels, lying deep in the valence band, we carry out time-resolved measurements which show that the photoexcited barrier is a source of long-lived holes tunneling into the quantum wells. Calculations of the conduction band electron effective g-factor show its strong variation with the electron's energy and the external magnetic field.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.07776 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. In these calculations, strain effects were not taken [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: The effective electron [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Energy of LLs in the VB calculated for samples [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: PL spectra from the samples CdTe/(Cd,Mg)Te SQW, MQW A and MQW B (left to right) registered in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Positions of spectral features for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Green points - the “missed” transition. Open [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: PL spectra of the CdTe/(Cd,Mg)Te SQW [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Positions of PL peaks in data registered on the CdTe/(Cd,Mg)Te MQW A and MQW B samples in both [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: A false color map of the time-resolved PL for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. Waag, H. Heinke, S. Scholl, C. R. Becker, and G. Landwehr, Growth of mgte and cd1−xmgxte thin films by molecular beam epitaxy, J. Crystal Growth131, 607 (1993)

    work page 1993

  2. [2]

    A. Waag, F. Fischer, T. Litz, B. Kuhn-Heinrich, U. Zehn- der, W. Ossau, W. Spahn, and G. Landwehr, Wide gap cd1−xmgxte: molecular beam epitaxial growth and char- acterization, J. Crystal Growth138, 155 (1994)

    work page 1994

  3. [3]

    Gerthsen, D

    D. Gerthsen, D. Meertens, H. Heinke, A. Waag, T. Lits, and G. Landwehr, Structural properties of cdmgte/cdte superlattices, J. Appl. Phys.75, 7323 (1994)

    work page 1994

  4. [4]

    MagTop” project (FENG.02.01-IP.05-0028/23) car- ried out within the “International Research Agendas

    The energy of such transition would be much higher than awaited (see Fig. 3; we are expecting transition to the lowest VB energy levels, i.e.,Φv 1 or Φv −2). Let us note that the theoretical approaches to the CB and the VB presented above are not equivalent. In the case of the CB, to go beyond a simplified parabolic and one-band approach, we introduce an ...

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Wojtowicz, M

    T. Wojtowicz, M. Kutrowski, G. Karczewski, G. Cy- wiński, M. Surma, J. Kossut, D. R. Yakovlev, W. Ossau, G. Landwehr, and V. Kochereshko, Novel cdte/cdmgte graded quantum well structures, Acta Phys. Polonica92, 1063 (1997)

    work page 1997

  6. [6]

    B. A. Piot, J. Kunc, M. Potemski, D. K. Maude, C. Bet- thausen, A. Vogl, D. Weiss, G. Karczewski, and T. Woj- towicz, Fractional quantum hall effect in cdte, Phys. Rev. B 82, 081307(R) (2010)

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    Czapkiewicz, V

    M. Czapkiewicz, V. Kolkovsky, P. Nowicki, M. Wiater, T. Wojciechowski, T. Wojtowicz, and J. Wróbel, Evi- dence for charging effects in cdte/cdmgte quantum point contacts, Phys. Rev. B86, 165415 (2012)

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    Kuhn-Heinrich, W

    B. Kuhn-Heinrich, W. Ossau, H. Heinke, F. Fischer, T. Litz, A. Waag, and G. Landwehr, Optical investiga- tion of confinement and strain effects in cdte(cdmg)te quantum wells, Appl. Phys. Lett.63, 2932 (1993)

    work page 1993

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    Kheng, R

    K. Kheng, R. T. Cox, K. S. Y. Merle d’Aubigne, F. Bas- sani,andS.Tatarenko,Observationofnegativelycharged excitons x− in semiconductor quantum wells, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1752 (1993)

    1993

  2. [10]

    Kossacki, Optical studies of charged excitons in ii-vi semiconductor quantum wells, J

    P. Kossacki, Optical studies of charged excitons in ii-vi semiconductor quantum wells, J. Condensed Matter15, R471 (2003)

    2003

  3. [11]

    Hawrylak, Optical properties of a two-dimensional electron gas: Evolution of spectra from excitons to fermi- edge singularities, Phys

    P. Hawrylak, Optical properties of a two-dimensional electron gas: Evolution of spectra from excitons to fermi- edge singularities, Phys. Rev. B44, 3821 (1991)

    1991

  4. [12]

    G. Coli, L. Calcagnile, P. V. Giugno, R. Cingolani, R. Rinaldi, L. Vanzetti, L. Sorba, and A. Franciosi, Fermi-edge singularity in the luminescence spectra of ii- vi modulation-doping quantum wells, Phys. Rev. B55, R7391 (1997)

    1997

  5. [13]

    Huard, R

    V. Huard, R. T. Cox, K. Saminadayar, A. Arnoult, and S. Tatarenko, Bound states in optical absorption of semi- conductor quantum wells containing a two-dimensional electron gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 187 (2000)

    2000

  6. [14]

    R. A. Suris, V. P. Kochereshko, G. V. Astakhov, D. R. Yakovlev, W. Ossau, J. Nürnberger, W. Faschinger, G. Landwehr, T. Wojtowicz, G. Karczewski, and J. Kos- sut, Excitons and trions modified by interaction with a two-dimensional electron gas, phys. stat. sol. (b)227, 343 (2001)

    2001

  7. [15]

    Imanaka, T

    Y. Imanaka, T. Takamasu, G. Kido, G. Karczewski, T. Wojtowicz, and J. Kossut, Stability of singlet- and triplet-charged excitons in cdte/cdmgte two-dimensional electron system around ν = 1, J. Supercond. 18, 215 (2005)

    2005

  8. [16]

    Andronikov, V

    D. Andronikov, V. Kochereshko, A. Platonov, T. Bar- rick, S. A. Crooker, and G. Karczewski, Singlet and triplet trion states in high magnetic fields: Photolumi- nescence and reflectivity spectra of modulation-doped cdte/cd0.7mg0.3 quantum wells, Phys. Rev. B72, 165339 (2005)

    2005

  9. [17]

    C. R. L. P. N. Jeukens, P. C. M. Christianen, J. C. Maan, D. R. Yakovlev, W. Ossau, V. P. Kochereshko, T. Woj- towicz, G. Karczewski, and J. Kossut, Dynamical equilib- rium between excitons and trions in cdte quantum wells in high magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. B66, 235318 (2002)

    2002

  10. [18]

    Tribollet, F

    J. Tribollet, F. Bernerdot, M. Menant, G. Karczewski, C. Testelin, and M. Chamarro, Interplay of spin dynam- ics of trions and two-dimensional electron gas in a n- doped cdte single quantum well, Phys. Rev. B68, 235316 (2003)

    2003

  11. [19]

    V. P. Kochereshko, D. R. Yakovlev, R. A. Suris, W. Os- sau, A. Waag, G. Landwehr, P. C. M. Christianen, and J. C. Maan, Combined exciton - electron processes in modulation-doped structures, Phys. Rev. Lett.79, 3974 (1997)

    1997

  12. [20]

    D. R. Yakovlev, V. P. Kochereshko, R. A. Suris, H. Schenk, W. Ossau, G. Landwehr, T. Wojtowicz, M. Kutrowski, G. Karczewski, and J. Kossut, Combined exciton - cyclotron resonance in quantum well structures, phys. stat. solidi (a)164, 213 (1997)

    1997

  13. [21]

    V. P. Kochereshko, D. R. Yakovlev, R. A. Suris, W. Os- sau, G. Landwehr, T. Wojtowicz, M. Kutrowski, G. Kar- czewski, and J. Kossut, Exciton-electron interactions in cdte/cdmgte modulation-doped qw structures, Journal of Crystal Growth184/185, 826 (1998)

    1998

  14. [22]

    Bratschitsch, Z

    R. Bratschitsch, Z. Chen, S. T. Cundiff, E. A. Zhukov, D. R. Yakovlev, M. Bayer, G. Karczewski, T. Woj- towicz, and J. Kossut, Electron spin coherence in n- doped cdte/cdmgte quantum wells, Appl. Phys. Lett.89, 221113 (2006)

    2006

  15. [23]

    Z. Chen, R. Bratschitsch, S. G. Carter, S. T. Cun- diff, D. R. Yakovlev, G. Karczewski, T. Wojtowicz, and J.Kossut,Electronspinpolarizationthroughinteractions between excitons, trions and the two-dimensional elec- tron gas, Phys. Rev. B75, 115320 (2007)

    2007

  16. [24]

    E. A. Zhukov, D. R. Yakovlev, M. Bayer, M. M. Glazov, E. I. Ivchenko, G. Karczewski, T. Wojtowicz, and J. Kos- sut, Spin coherence of a two-dimensional electron gas in- duced by resonant excitation of trions and excitons in cdte/(cd,mg)te quantum wells, Phys. Rev. B76, 205310 (2007)

    2007

  17. [25]

    J. H. Versluis, A. V. Kimel, V. N. Gridnev, D. R. Yakovlev, G. Karczewski, T. Wojtowicz, J. Kossut, A. Kirilyuk, and T. Rasing, Photoinduced magneto- optical kerr and ultrafast spin dynamics in cdte/cdmgte quantum wells during excitation by shaped laser pulses, Phys. Rev. B80,...

    2009

  18. [26]

    Phelps, T

    C. Phelps, T. Sweeney, R. T. Cox, and H. Wang, Ul- trafast coherent electron spin flip in a modulation-doped cdte quantum wells, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 237402 (2009). 14

    2009

  19. [27]

    Moody, I

    G. Moody, I. A. Akimov, H. Li, R. Singh, D. R. Yakovlev, G. Karczewski, M. Wiater, T. Wojtowicz, M. Bayer, and S. T. Cundiff, Coherent coupling of excitons and trions in a photoexcited cdte/cdmgte quantum well, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 097401 (2014)

    2014

  20. [28]

    Salewski, S

    M. Salewski, S. V. Poltavtsev, I. A. Yugova, G. Kar- czewski, M. Wiater, T. Wojtowicz, D. R. Yakovlev, I. A. Akimov, T. Meier, and M. Bayer, High-resolution two- dimensional optical spectroscopy of electron spins, Phys. Rev. X7, 031030 (2017)

    2017

  21. [29]

    S. V. Poltavtsev, M. Reichelt, I. A. Akimov, G. Kar- czewski, M. Wiater, T. Wojtowicz, D. R. Yakovlev, T. Meier, and M. Bayer, Damping of rabi oscillations in intensity-dependent photon echoes from exciton com- plexes in a cdte/(cd,mg)te single quantum well, Phys. Rev. B96, 07...

    2017

  22. [30]

    A. N. Kosarev, S. V. Poltavtsev, L. E. Golub, M. M. Glazov, M. Salewski, N. V. Kozyrev, E. A. Zhukov, G. Karczewski, S. Chusnutdinow, T. Wojtowicz, T. Meier, and M. Bayer, Microscopic dynamics of elec- tron hopping in a semiconductor quantum well probed by spin-dependent photo...

    2019

  23. [31]

    S. V. Poltavtsev, I. A. Yugova, A. N. Kosarev, D. R. Yakovlev, G. Karczewski, S. Chusnutdinow, T. Wojtow- icz, I. A. Akomov, and M. Bayer, In-plane anisotropy of the hole g-factor in cdte/(cd,mg)te quantum wells stud- ied by spin-dependent photon echoes, Phys. Rev. Re- search ...

    2020

  24. [32]

    S. V. Poltavtsev, I. A. Yugova, I. Babenko, I. A. Aki- mov, D. R. Yakovlev, G. Karczewski, S. Chusnutdinow, T. Wojtowicz, and M. Bayer, Quantum beats in the po- larization of the spin-dependent photon echo from donor- bound excitons in cdte/(cd,mg)te quantum wells, Phys. Rev. ...

    2020

  25. [33]

    Bihlmayer, O

    G. Bihlmayer, O. Rader, and R. Winkler, Focus on the rashba effect, New J. Phys.17, 050202 (2015)

    2015

  26. [34]

    Ekenberg and M

    U. Ekenberg and M. Altarelli, Calculation of hole sub- bands at the gaas-alxga1−x interface, Phys. Rev. B30, 3569 (1984)

    1984

  27. [35]

    Broido and L

    D. Broido and L. J. Sham, Effective masses of holes at gaas-algaasheterojunctions,Phys.Rev.B 31,888(1985)

    1985

  28. [36]

    Kubisa, L

    M. Kubisa, L. Bryja, K. Ryczko, J. Misiewicz, C. Bar- dot, M. Potemski, G. Ortner, M. Byer, A. Forchel, and C. B. Sørensen, Photoluminescence investigations of two-dimensional hole landau levels in p-type sin- gle alxga1−xas/gaas heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B67, 035305 (2003)

    2003

  29. [37]

    W. Pötz, W. Porod, and D. K. Ferry, Theoretical study of subband levels in semiconductor interfaces, Phys. Rev. B 32, 3868 (1985)

    1985

  30. [38]

    Ancilotto, A

    F. Ancilotto, A. Fasolino, and J. C. Maan, Hole-subband mixing in quantum wells: A magnetooptical study, Phys. Rev. B38, 1788 (1988)

    1988

  31. [39]

    López-Richard, G

    V. López-Richard, G. E. Marques, and C. Trallero-Giner, Spin-flip effect in narrow-gap semiconductor quantum wells, phys. stat.sol (b)231, 263 (2002)

    2002

  32. [40]

    L. M. Roth, B. Lax, and S. Zwerdling, Theory of opti- cal magneto-absorption effects in semiconductors, Phys. Rev. 114, 90 (1959)

    1959

  33. [41]

    Oestreich, S

    M. Oestreich, S. Hallstein, A. P. Heberle, K. Eberl, E. Bauser, and W. W. Rühle, Temperature and density dependence of the electron landég factor in semiconduc- tors, Phys. Rev. B53, 7911 (1996)

    1996

  34. [42]

    A. P. Heberle, W. W. Rühle, and K. Ploog, Quantum beats of electron larmor precession in gaas wells, Phys. Rev. Lett.72, 3887 (1994)

    1994

  35. [43]

    X. Q. Zhao, M. Oestreich, and N. Magnea, Electron and hole g-factorsincdte/cdmgtequantumwells,Appl.Phys. Lett. 69, 3704 (1996)

    1996

  36. [44]

    A. A. Sirenko, T. Ruf, M. Cardona, D. R. Yakovlev, W. Ossau, A. Waag, and G. Landwehr, Electron and hole g factors measured by spin-flip raman scattering in cdte/cd1−xmgxte single quantum wells, Phys. Rev. B56, 2114 (1997)

    1997

  37. [45]

    E. A. Zhukov, V. N. Mantsevitch, D. R. Yakovlev, N. E. Kopteva, E. Kirstein, A. Waag, G. Karczewski, T. Woj- towicz, and M. Bayer, Renormalization of the electrong factor in the degenerate two-dimensional electron gas of znse and cdte-based quantum wells, Phys. Rev. B102, 1253...

    2020

  38. [46]

    Pfeffer and W

    P. Pfeffer and W. Zawadzki, Bychkov-rashba spin splitting and its dependence on magnetic field in insb/in0.91al0.09sb asymmetric quantum wells, Phys. Rev. B68, 035315 (2003)

    2003

  39. [47]

    Cibert, R

    J. Cibert, R. André, and L. S. Dang, Piezoelectric ef- fect in strained cdte-based heterostructures, Acta Phys. Polonica A88, 591 (1995)

    1995

  40. [48]

    Winkler, Spin-orbit coupling effects in two- dimensional electron and hole systems (Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2003) p

    R. Winkler, Spin-orbit coupling effects in two- dimensional electron and hole systems (Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2003) p. 221

    2003

  41. [49]

    Adachi, Handbook on physical properties of semicon- ductors (Springer New York, NY, 2004)

    S. Adachi, Handbook on physical properties of semicon- ductors (Springer New York, NY, 2004)

    2004

  42. [50]

    Kacman and W

    P. Kacman and W. Zawadzki, Spin magnetic moment and spin resonance of conduction electrons inα-sn-type semiconductors, Phys. stat. sol. (b)47, 629 (1971)

    1971

  43. [51]

    J. M. Luttinger and W. Kohn, Motion of electrons and holes in perturbed periodic fields, Phys. Rev. 97, 869 (1995)

    1995

  44. [52]

    Meimberg, M

    K. Meimberg, M. Potemski, P. Hawrylak, Y. H. Zhang, and K. Ploog, Optically detected oscillations of screening by a two-dimensional electron gas in a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B55, 7685 (1997)

    1997

  45. [53]

    Łusakowski, R

    J. Łusakowski, R. Buczko, K.-J. Friedland, and R. Hey, Occupation of electron subbands in optically excitedδ- acceptor-doped gaas/alxga1−xas heterostructure, Phys. Rev. B83, 245313 (2011)

    2011

  46. [54]

    Ryczko, M

    K. Ryczko, M. Kubisa, L. Bryja, J. Misiewicz, R. Stęp- niewski, M. Byszewski, and M. Potemski, Hole subbands and landau levels in p-type single alxga1−xas/gaas het- erostructures, Physca B364, 451 (2004)

    2004

  47. [55]

    Jadczak, M

    J. Jadczak, M. Kubisa, K. Ryczko, L. Bryja, and M. Potemski, High magnetic field spin splitting of ex- citons in asymmetric gaas quantum wells, Phys. Rev. B 86, 245401 (2012)

    2012

  48. [56]

    Solarska, K

    W. Solarska, K. Karpierz, M. Zaremba, F. L. Mardele, I. Mohelsky, A. Siemaszko, M. Grymuza, Ł. Kipczak, N. Zawadzka, M. R. Molas, E. Imos, Z. Adamus, T. Słupiński, T. Wojtowicz, M. Orlita, A. Babiński, and J. Łusakowski, Magnetophotolumines- cence of modulation-doped cdte mult...

    2023

  49. [57]

    J. Kunc, K. Kowalik, F. J. Teran, P. Plochocka, B. A. Piot, D. K. Maude, M. Potemski, V. Kolkovsky, G. Kar- czewski, and T. Wojtowicz, Enhancement of the spin gap in fully occupied two-dimensional landau levels, Phys. Rev. B82, 115438 (2010)

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.