Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Bulk Viscosity of Two-Flavor Color Superconducting Quark Matter in Neutron Star Mergers

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Doubling the vector coupling of 2SC quark matter changes its bulk viscosity and damping timescale by factors of 3 to 20, driven mainly by the equation-of-state susceptibility, and the damping closely matches nucleonic matter.

desk verdict Useful parameter scan for 2SC bulk viscosity, but the light-quark Urca rates violate detailed balance and need fixing before the absolute numbers are trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.08144 v2 pith:SW46CTRN submitted 2025-06-09 nucl-th astro-ph.HE

Mark Alford , Arus Harutyunyan , Armen Sedrakian , Stefanos Tsiopelas This is my paper
classification nucl-thastro-ph.HE PACS 97.60.Jd26.60.-c
keywords bulkviscosityneutronstarmergerscolorsuperconductivity2SCphasequarkdirectUrcaprocessesNJLmodelgravitationalwavedampingtimescale
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to establish how strongly the bulk viscous damping of density oscillations in the color-superconducting quark core of a neutron star merger depends on the still-unconstrained vector coupling of the NJL quark model, and how that damping compares with ordinary nucleonic matter. Working in the two-flavor 2SC phase, where red-green up–down Cooper pairs with a gap of order 140–210 MeV freeze out most quarks and leave only blue light quarks and strange quarks to carry the weak Urca reactions, the authors compute the bulk viscosity from semi-leptonic direct Urca processes in neutrino-transparent matter at temperatures 1–10 MeV and baryon densities $4n_0$–$7n_0$. They find that doubling the vector coupling changes the bulk viscosity and its damping timescale by a factor of 3–20, with most of the sensitivity coming from the equation-of-state susceptibility $C$ rather than from the weak-reaction rates, while the diquark coupling matters far less. They also find that the resulting damping closely matches neutrino-transparent nucleonic matter over this temperature range, so bulk viscous behavior alone would not reveal whether a merger remnant contains a 2SC quark core. The stakes are concrete: the predicted damping timescales run from a few milliseconds to a few hundred milliseconds, comparable to the lifetime of the post-merger remnant, so bulk viscosity could shape the gravitational-wave signal.

What carries the argument

The argument runs on the classic resonant formula $\zeta = (C^2/A)\,\gamma/(\omega^2 + \gamma^2)$, in which $\gamma = \lambda A$ is the total Urca equilibration rate and the susceptibilities $A$ and $C$ measure how the $\beta$-disequilibrium chemical potential $\mu_\Delta = \delta\mu_d - \delta\mu_u - \delta\mu_e$ responds to changes in the up-quark fraction and in baryon density. The load-bearing object is $C$: it encodes how the repulsive vector interaction shifts the quark chemical potentials through the $\omega$ and $\phi$ mean fields and thereby changes the matter's response to compression, and the paper shows that this susceptibility — not the weak matrix elements — is the main source of the factor-of-3-to-20 sensitivity to $G_V$. The reaction side is carried by the semi-leptonic direct Urca processes, whose rates scale as $T^5$ for the light-quark $d$-channel (because all three participating fermions are ultrarelativistic, so the reaction is only opened by thermal smearing of Fermi surfaces) and as $T^4$ for the strange-quark channel, which stays kinematically open with roughly 70 MeV of available energy. The fast non-leptonic equilibration of $d$ and $s$ reduces the dynamics to the single chemical imbalance $\mu_\Delta$.

What would settle it

Compute the neutrino mean free path in 2SC quark matter at $4n_0$–$7n_0$ and $T = 1$–$10$ MeV using the same NJL equation of state: if that path is shorter than the quark-core radius, the free-streaming assumption fails and the quoted bulk viscosities are too large. Alternatively, a post-merger gravitational-wave signal whose measured damping timescale falls well outside the factor-of-3-to-20 band spanned by $G_V/G_S = 0.6$–$1.2$ would show that something other than the vector coupling controls the dissipation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in neutrino-transparent 2SC quark matter the bulk viscosity and its damping timescale are governed by the static susceptibilities of the equation of state rather than by the Urca rates themselves, and that these quantities are strongly sensitive to the vector coupling. Over baryon densities $4n_0$–$7n_0$ and temperatures 1–10 MeV, changing $G_V/G_S$ from 0.6 to 1.2 alters $\zeta$ and $\tau$ by factors of 3 to 20; the paper attributes this primarily to the $\beta$-disequilibrium–baryon-density susceptibility $C$ of Eq. (74), with the modifications to the weak-interaction rates playing a secondary role. Because the 2SC pairing gap far exceeds the temperature, the red and green light quarks are frozen out, and the physics is carried by blue-color up and down quarks together with strange quarks undergoing the direct Urca reactions $d \to u + e^- + \bar{\nu}_e$, $u + e^- \to d + \nu_e$, $s \to u + e^- + \bar{\nu}_e$, and $u + e^- \to s + \nu_e$, with the fast non-leptonic process $u + d \leftrightarrow u + s$ keeping $\mu_d = \mu_s$ at all times. The companion claim is that the resulting bulk viscosity and damping times closely resemble those of neutrino-transparent nucleonic matter, which the authors take to mean that bulk viscous damping will not easily distinguish 2SC quark matter from nuclear matter in merger remnants.

Load-bearing premise

The results assume that neutrinos escape freely from the quark matter at temperatures up to 10 MeV and that the matter is in the 2SC phase with its large pairing gap; if neutrinos were trapped instead, the weak reactions would slow and the bulk viscosity would be significantly smaller, and the paper notes that the onset of trapping depends on the model adopted.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Damping timescales of a few milliseconds to a few hundred milliseconds match the short-term evolution of a post-merger remnant, so bulk viscosity from quark Urca processes can be a leading dissipation mechanism in hybrid stars with 2SC cores.
  • Over 1–10 MeV, 2SC and nucleonic matter damp density oscillations at nearly the same rate, so a gravitational-wave damping measurement alone is unlikely to reveal whether the remnant contains quark matter.
  • Doubling the vector coupling changes $\zeta$ and $\tau$ by factors of 3–20 at $4n_0$–$7n_0$, so the unconstrained $G_V$ sets the dominant model uncertainty in predicting merger dissipation from quark cores.
  • The diquark coupling has little effect (at most about a factor of two even at $7n_0$) because the pairing gap far exceeds the temperature and simply removes the red-green quarks from the reactions.
  • Below about 0.1 MeV a second, non-leptonic bulk-viscosity peak appears in quark matter that is absent in nuclear matter, offering a low-temperature discriminator between the phases.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A measured post-merger damping timescale at densities near $4n_0$–$7n_0$ could effectively pin down $G_V$, since each value of the vector coupling within $0.6$–$1.2$ times $G_S$ predicts a distinct damping band; conversely, without fixing this coupling, simulations cannot claim predictive dissipation from quark cores.
  • Because the vector coupling also shifts the equation-of-state pressure, the same uncertainty should show up in tidal deformability during inspiral, so combining inspiral and post-merger gravitational-wave data could constrain $G_V$ and test the 2SC scenario simultaneously.
  • The crossover between the $T^5$ light-quark and $T^4$ strange-quark Urca channels places the bulk-viscosity resonance near $T \approx 3$–$6$ MeV for kHz oscillations; computing bulk viscosity with other quark models (bag models, perturbative or holographic QCD) at these temperatures would test whether that resonance temperature is a robust feature.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper computes the bulk viscosity and associated damping timescales of neutrino-transparent two-flavor color-superconducting (2SC) quark matter in neutron star merger conditions, using an SU(3) NJL model with vector and diquark couplings and a 't Hooft term. The authors derive weak-interaction Urca rates for unpaired blue light quarks and strange quarks, construct a linear-response bulk viscosity formula, and scan the ratio G_V/G_S from 0.6 to 1.2 and G_D/G_S from 1 to 1.25. Their main quantitative finding is that varying the vector coupling by a factor of 2 changes the bulk viscosity and damping timescale by a factor of 3-20 at densities 4n0-7n0, and that this sensitivity comes primarily from the static susceptibility C rather than from the weak rates. They also conclude that the bulk viscosity of 2SC quark matter closely resembles that of nucleonic matter, making it difficult to distinguish the two by bulk viscous dissipation alone.

Significance. The paper addresses a timely and observationally relevant question: whether bulk viscous dissipation in a possible quark core of a neutron star merger remnant can leave a distinct imprint on gravitational waves. The bulk-viscosity formalism in Sec. 4 is a clean linear-response construction, with the susceptibilities A and C computed from the model equation of state rather than fitted to the target viscosity. The parametric study of G_V and G_D is systematic, and the comparison with nucleonic-matter results from Ref. [18] provides a useful baseline. If the central numerical results are correct, the finding that 2SC matter is hard to distinguish from nucleonic matter via bulk viscosity is important for interpreting future post-merger observations. The paper is also transparent about its main limitations, notably the neutrino-transparency assumption and the model dependence of competing phases such as gapless 2SC.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3, Eqs. (38)-(43)] The manuscript should either verify that the numerical rates satisfy Gamma_{d->u e nu-bar}(0) = Gamma_{u e->d nu}(0) and explain why the forward-rate derivative is negligible, or revise the analytic derivation so that the vanishing of the forward rate is not stated as a general result without noting that it is a singular limit of the massless approximation.
  2. [Sec. 5.2 and Sec. 6, Eqs. (72)-(74)] Please add a table or figure showing A, C, and C^2/A as functions of n_b for the four values of G_V used in the paper, together with the corresponding gamma at the resonance temperature.
  3. [Sec. 1 and Sec. 6] Consider adding a caveat to the abstract or conclusions that the quoted damping timescales apply only in the neutrino-transparent temperature/density window assumed throughout.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3, text near Eq. (38)] This will prevent a misreading that the manuscript is claiming a fundamental violation of detailed balance.
  2. [Fig. 6 caption] The same labels appear in the text and should be defined at first use.
  3. [Sec. 5.2, paragraph on temperature scaling] This will make the claimed deviation from the T^{-4.5} scaling testable.
  4. [Eq. (42)] This is a presentation issue but would help the reader track the sign conventions in Eqs. (51) and (72).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: bulk viscosity is derived from rate equations and EoS susceptibilities, not fitted; headline sensitivity is a parametric scan.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. The bulk viscosity in Eq. (72) follows from the weak-reaction rate equations (53)-(56), with the susceptibility prefactor C^2/A computed from the NJL equation of state (Eqs. (73)-(74)), and the relaxation rate gamma = lambda A built from the computed Urca coefficients lambda_d and lambda_s (Eqs. (42), (45)). No parameter is adjusted to reproduce a target viscosity: the varied couplings G_V and G_D are scanned inputs, so the factor-3-20 sensitivity statement is a parametric variation result, not a prediction tuned to data. The comparison to nucleonic matter from Ref. [18] is an external benchmark, and the methodological reference to Ref. [17] is for integration technique, not a load-bearing unverified premise. The paper's self-citations to [22] and [36] provide context and prior treatment of the same phase, but the present calculation recomputes the rates, susceptibilities, and viscosity rather than importing them as inputs. The possible detailed-balance inconsistency between the vanishing forward rate in Eq. (38) and the nonzero reverse rate in Eq. (41) is a physical correctness concern about the rate coefficient lambda_d, not a circularity: it does not make the output equivalent to an input by definition. Under the hard rules, self-citation without load-bearing reduction to an unverified premise is not circularity, so the appropriate finding is a low score of 1 reflecting only the modest self-citation footprint.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the NJL model as an assumed description of 2SC matter (axioms 1 and 3), the transparent-neutrino regime (axiom 2), and two kinetic simplifications: instantaneous non-leptonic equilibrium (axiom 4) and equal u/d vector coupling (axiom 5). The free parameters GV/GS and GD/GS are scanned, not fitted; the sensitivity of the result to GV is the paper's main finding, not a circularity. The numerical coefficients of the rates (Eq. 43) and the susceptibilities are computed within the model; the former could not be independently checked from the text. No new entities are introduced: the omega and phi vector mean fields in Eq. (8) are standard NJL mean-field background fields.

free parameters (3)
  • GV/GS (vector coupling ratio) = 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2 (scanned)
    Not fixed by the vacuum NJL fits cited in Sec. 2 (vector interactions vanish in vacuum); the paper's headline result is the factor 3-20 sensitivity of zeta to this ratio.
  • GD/GS (diquark coupling ratio) = 1.0 and 1.25
    Controls the 2SC gap; varied to test sensitivity, found to have minor impact because the gap (about 140-210 MeV) stays far above T.
  • B* (effective bag constant) = 0
    Set to zero in Eq. (9) because only the pressure derivative enters the incompressibility K in Eq. (76); the choice does not affect the central results.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption NJL model in mean-field approximation, with parameters fitted to vacuum meson properties (Ref. [64]), describes quark matter at densities 4-7 n0.
    Invoked throughout Secs. 2-5; the EoS, composition, pairing gap, and susceptibilities all come from this model, including the ultraviolet cutoff Lambda = 602.3 MeV.
  • domain assumption Matter is neutrino-transparent for T <= 10 MeV at merger-core densities.
    Stated in Sec. 1; all weak rates are treated as one-directional neutrino emission. The paper concedes the trapping condition is model dependent (Refs. [43-45]) and that trapping suppresses bulk viscosity.
  • domain assumption The 2SC phase is realized, with red-green u-d quarks fully gapped (T << Delta), so only blue light quarks and strange quarks of all colors carry the Urca reactions.
    Sec. 2 and Fig. 1; competing phases (quarkyonic matter, inhomogeneous chiral phases, gapless 2SC) are discussed in Sec. 1 and the conclusions but not included in the calculation.
  • domain assumption The non-leptonic reaction d + u -> s + u maintains mu_s = mu_d instantaneously on kHz timescales, reducing the system to a single out-of-beta-equilibrium variable.
    Secs. 3-4, Eqs. (17) and (63); justified by Fig. 6 showing lambda_non-lep exceeds lambda_Urca by orders of magnitude in the temperature range studied.
  • domain assumption Vector mean fields couple equally to u and d quarks (no isovector channel), giving Delta u = 0; the d-decay rate then vanishes at leading order in the ultrarelativistic limit.
    Sec. 3, Eqs. (8), (37)-(38); the extraction of lambda_d from the e-capture rate alone rests on this assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Bulk Viscosity of Two-Flavor Color Superconducting Quark Matter in Neutron Star Mergers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SW46CTRN

@misc{pith2026250608144,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Bulk Viscosity of Two-Flavor Color Superconducting Quark Matter in Neutron Star Mergers},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SW46CTRN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.08144}
}
read the original abstract

This work investigates the bulk viscosity of warm, dense, neutrino-transparent, color-superconducting quark matter, where damping of density oscillations in the kHz frequency range arises from weak-interaction-driven direct Urca processes involving quarks. We study the two-flavor red-green paired color-superconducting (2SC) phase, while allowing for the presence of unpaired strange quarks and blue color light quarks of all flavors. Our calculations are based on the SU(3) Nambu-Jona-Lasinio (NJL) model, extended to include both vector interactions and the `t Hooft determinant term. The primary focus is on how variations in the NJL Lagrangian parameters -- specifically, the diquark and vector coupling strengths -- affect both the static properties of quark matter, such as its equation of state and composition, and its dynamical behavior, including bulk viscosity and associated damping timescales. We find that the bulk viscosity and corresponding damping timescale can change by more than an order of magnitude upon varying the vector coupling by a factor of two at high densities and by a lesser degree at lower densities. This sensitivity primarily arises from the susceptibility of 2SC matter, with a smaller contribution from modifications to the weak interaction rates. In comparison, changes in the diquark coupling have a more limited impact. The damping of density oscillations in 2SC matter is similar quantitatively to nucleonic matter and can be a leading mechanism of dissipation in merging hybrid stars containing color superconducting cores. -

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.08144 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. 2SC gap as a function of number density for temperature T = 1 MeV and varying values of vector and diquark couplings. The temperature dependence of the gap is weak in the regime of interest, where T ≪ ∆. which is given by P = 1 2π 2 X 18 i=1 Z Λ 0 dkk2  |ϵi | + 2T ln  1 + e− |ϵi | T  + 4Kσuσdσs − 1 4GD X 3 c=1 |∆c| 2 − 2GS X 3 α=1 σ 2 α + 1 4GV [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Pressure as a function of number density for temperature T = 1 MeV and various fixed values of vector and diquark couplings. Finally, the repulsive vector interaction acts oppositely by reducing the pairing gap by at most a few percent when going from GV /GS = 0.6 to GV /GS = 1.2. The energy gap indicates how effectively the phase space of green and red light quarks is suppressed in weak reactions, thereby limiting … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Composition of 2SC matter as a function of number density for T = 1 MeV and varying vector and diquark couplings, where Xi = ni/nb with ni being the density of any given species. Top row: unpaired (blue) quark fractions. Bottom row: charged lepton (e − and µ −) fractions. the chiral condensate, which generally depends on both density and temperature. This comparison reveals to what degree the different particles are… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Effective chemical potentials as functions of number density for T = 1 MeV and various fixed values of the vector and diquark couplings. The variations of chemical potentials with temperature are insignificant in the range of interest and are not shown. electrons and m…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Quark masses as functions of number density for T = 1 MeV and various fixed values of vector and diquark couplings. The variations of masses with temperature are insignificant in the range of interest and are not shown. 3 URCA REACTION RATES FOR ude AND udse COMPOSITIO…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The equilibration coefficients λ of Urca and non-leptonic processes as functions of temperature for fixed values of number density and various fixed values of vector and diquark couplings. etc.) of the participating particles. It is seen that the combined effect on the…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The γ parameter as a function of temperature for two values of number density and various fixed values of vector and diquark couplings. scaling, which would be the only temperature-dependent component if all particles were massive (implicit weak dependence of masses an…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Bulk viscosity as a function of temperature for nb = 4n0 (solid lines) and nb = 7n0 (dashed lines) and various fixed values of vector and diquark couplings; here n0 is the nuclear saturation density. For comparison, we also show the bulk viscosity of neutrino-transpare…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Dependence of bulk viscous damping timescales on temperature for two values of number density and various fixed values of vector and diquark couplings. For comparison, we also show the damping timescales of neutrino-transparent nucleonic matter as was computed in Ref. …

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Neutrino absorption in two-flavor color-superconducting quark matter

    nucl-th 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    In 2SC quark matter, neutrino absorption is dominated by strange-quark capture at low temperature, and a degenerate neutrino gas at electron lepton fraction 0.1 has a mean free path of meters or less.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [22]

    Bulk viscosity of two-color superconducting quark matter in neutron star mergers.Phys

    Alford M, Harutyunyan A, Sedrakian A, Tsiopelas S. Bulk viscosity of two-color superconducting quark matter in neutron star mergers.Phys. Rev. D110(2024) L061303. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110. L061303

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.110 2024

  2. [18]

    Bulk viscosity from Urca processes: n p e µ matter in the neutrino-transparent regime.Phys

    Alford M, Harutyunyan A, Sedrakian A. Bulk viscosity from Urca processes: n p e µ matter in the neutrino-transparent regime.Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 083019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.083019

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.083019 2023

  3. [1]

    Gw170817: Observation of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral.Phys

    The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, The Virgo Collaboration. Gw170817: Observation of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral.Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) 161101. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.119.161101

    work page 2017

  4. [2]

    Binary Neutron Star Mergers.Living Rev

    Faber JA, Rasio FA. Binary Neutron Star Mergers.Living Rev. Rel.15(2012) 8. doi:10.12942/ lrr-2012-8

    work page 2012

  5. [3]

    Binary neutron-star mergers: a review of Einstein’s richest laboratory.Rept

    Baiotti L, Rezzolla L. Binary neutron-star mergers: a review of Einstein’s richest laboratory.Rept. Prog. Phys.80(2017) 096901. doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aa67bb

    doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aa67bb 2017

  6. [4]

    Gravitational waves from neutron star mergers and their relation to the nuclear equation of state.Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics109(2019) 103714

    Baiotti L. Gravitational waves from neutron star mergers and their relation to the nuclear equation of state.Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics109(2019) 103714. doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2019.103714

    work page arXiv 2019

  7. [5]

    Identifying a First-Order Phase Transition in Neutron-Star Mergers through Gravitational Waves.Phys

    Bauswein A, Bastian NUF, Blaschke DB, Chatziioannou K, Clark JA, Fischer T, et al. Identifying a First-Order Phase Transition in Neutron-Star Mergers through Gravitational Waves.Phys. Rev. Lett. 122(2019) 061102. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.061102

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.061102 2019

  8. [6]

    Ab-initio General-relativistic Neutrino-radiation Hydrodynamics Simulations of Long-lived Neutron Star Merger Remnants to Neutrino Cooling Timescales.Astrophys

    Radice D, Bernuzzi S. Ab-initio General-relativistic Neutrino-radiation Hydrodynamics Simulations of Long-lived Neutron Star Merger Remnants to Neutrino Cooling Timescales.Astrophys. J.959 (2023) 46. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad0235

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad0235 2023

Show all 74 references
  1. [7]

    Turbulence modelling in neutron star merger simulations.Liv

    Radice D, Hawke I. Turbulence modelling in neutron star merger simulations.Liv. Rev. Comput. Astrophys.10(2024) 1. doi:10.1007/s41115-023-00019-9

    2024 doi

  2. [8]

    Viscous Dissipation and Heat Conduction in Binary Neutron-Star Mergers.Phys

    Alford MG, Bovard L, Hanauske M, Rezzolla L, Schwenzer K. Viscous Dissipation and Heat Conduction in Binary Neutron-Star Mergers.Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018) 041101. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.120.041101

    2018

  3. [9]

    Electrical conductivity of a warm neutron star crust in magnetic fields

    Harutyunyan A, Sedrakian A. Electrical conductivity of a warm neutron star crust in magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. C94(2016) 025805. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.94.025805

    2016 doi

  4. [10]

    Reaction rates and transport in neutron stars.Astrophys

    Schmitt A, Shternin P. Reaction rates and transport in neutron stars.Astrophys. Space Sci. Libr .457 (2018) 455–574. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-97616-7 9

    2018 doi

  5. [11]

    Electrical resistivity and Hall effect in binary neutron star mergers.European Physical Journal A54(2018) 191

    Harutyunyan A, Nathanail A, Rezzolla L, Sedrakian A. Electrical resistivity and Hall effect in binary neutron star mergers.European Physical Journal A54(2018) 191. doi:10.1140/epja/i2018-12624-1

    2018 doi

  6. [12]

    Thermal Conductivity and Thermal Hall Effect in Dense Electron-Ion Plasma.Particles7(2024) 967–983

    Harutyunyan A, Sedrakian A. Thermal Conductivity and Thermal Hall Effect in Dense Electron-Ion Plasma.Particles7(2024) 967–983. doi:10.3390/particles7040059

    2024 doi

  7. [13]

    Electrical conductivity of a warm neutron star crust in magnetic fields: Neutron-drip regime.Phys

    Harutyunyan A, Sedrakian A, Gevorgyan NT, Hayrapetyan MV . Electrical conductivity of a warm neutron star crust in magnetic fields: Neutron-drip regime.Phys. Rev. C109(2024) 055804. doi:10. 1103/PhysRevC.109.055804

    2024

  8. [14]

    Damping of density oscillations in neutrino-transparent nuclear matter

    Alford MG, Harris SP. Damping of density oscillations in neutrino-transparent nuclear matter. Phys. Rev. C100(2019) 035803. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.100.035803. Frontiers 25 Alford et al.Bulk viscosity and damping timescales

    2019 doi

  9. [15]

    Bulk Viscous Damping of Density Oscillations in Neutron Star Mergers.Particles3(2020) 500–517

    Alford M, Harutyunyan A, Sedrakian A. Bulk Viscous Damping of Density Oscillations in Neutron Star Mergers.Particles3(2020) 500–517. doi:10.3390/particles3020034

    2020 doi

  10. [16]

    Beta Equilibrium Under Neutron Star Merger Conditions

    Alford MG, Haber A, Harris SP, Zhang Z. Beta Equilibrium Under Neutron Star Merger Conditions. Universe7(2021) 399. doi:10.3390/universe7110399

    2021 doi

  11. [17]

    Bulk viscosity from Urca processes: npe µ matter in the neutrino-trapped regime.Phys

    Alford M, Harutyunyan A, Sedrakian A. Bulk viscosity from Urca processes: npe µ matter in the neutrino-trapped regime.Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 103027. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.103027

    2021 doi

  12. [19]

    Strangeness-changing rates and hyperonic bulk viscosity in neutron star mergers

    Alford MG, Haber A. Strangeness-changing rates and hyperonic bulk viscosity in neutron star mergers. Phys. Rev. C103(2021) 045810. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.103.045810

    2021 doi

  13. [20]

    Estimate for the Bulk Viscosity of Strongly Coupled Quark Matter Using Perturbative QCD and Holography.Phys

    Cruz Rojas J, Gorda T, Hoyos C, Jokela N, J ¨arvinen M, Kurkela A, et al. Estimate for the Bulk Viscosity of Strongly Coupled Quark Matter Using Perturbative QCD and Holography.Phys. Rev. Lett. 133(2024) 071901. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.071901

    2024 doi

  14. [21]

    Damping of density oscillations from bulk viscosity in quark matter.Phys

    Hern´andez JL, Manuel C, Tolos L. Damping of density oscillations from bulk viscosity in quark matter.Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 123022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.123022

    2024 doi

  15. [23]

    Bulk viscosity of baryonic matter with trapped neutrinos

    Alford M, Harutyunyan A, Sedrakian A. Bulk viscosity of baryonic matter with trapped neutrinos. Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 103021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.103021

    2019 doi

  16. [24]

    Projecting the likely importance of weak-interaction-driven bulk viscosity in neutron s tar mergers.Mon

    Most ER, Harris SP, Plumberg C, Alford MG, Noronha J, Noronha-Hostler J, et al. Projecting the likely importance of weak-interaction-driven bulk viscosity in neutron s tar mergers.Mon. Not. RAS 509(2022) 1096–1108. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2793

    2022 doi

  17. [25]

    Formulating bulk viscosity for neutron star simulations.Phys

    Celora T, Hawke I, Hammond PC, Andersson N, Comer GL. Formulating bulk viscosity for neutron star simulations.Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 103016. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.103016

    2022 doi

  18. [26]

    Impact of Bulk Viscosity on the Postmerger Gravitational-Wave Signal from Merging Neutron Stars.Phys

    Chabanov M, Rezzolla L. Impact of Bulk Viscosity on the Postmerger Gravitational-Wave Signal from Merging Neutron Stars.Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 071402. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.071402

    2025 doi

  19. [27]

    Numerical modeling of bulk viscosity in neutron stars.Phys

    Chabanov M, Rezzolla L. Numerical modeling of bulk viscosity in neutron stars.Phys. Rev. D111 (2025) 044074. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.044074

    2025 doi

  20. [28]

    Thermal aspects of neutron star mergers.Phys

    Hammond P, Hawke I, Andersson N. Thermal aspects of neutron star mergers.Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) 103006. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.103006

    2021 doi

  21. [29]

    A new moment-based general-relativistic neutrino-radiation transport code: Methods and first applications to neutron star mergers.Mon

    Radice D, Bernuzzi S, Perego A, Haas R. A new moment-based general-relativistic neutrino-radiation transport code: Methods and first applications to neutron star mergers.Mon. Not. RAS512(2022) 1499–1521. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac589

    2022 doi

  22. [30]

    Simulating bulk viscosity in neutron stars

    Camelio G, Gavassino L, Antonelli M, Bernuzzi S, Haskell B. Simulating bulk viscosity in neutron stars. I. Formalism.Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 103031. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.103031

    2023 doi

  23. [32]

    Probing internal dissipative processes of neutron stars with gravitational waves during the inspiral of neutron star binaries.Phys

    Ripley JL, Hegade K R A, Yunes N. Probing internal dissipative processes of neutron stars with gravitational waves during the inspiral of neutron star binaries.Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 103037. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.103037

    2023 doi

  24. [33]

    Tidal heating in binary inspiral of strange quark stars.arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2504.07659

    Ghosh S, Hern´andez JL, Keshari Pradhan B, Manuel C, Chatterjee D, Tolos L. Tidal heating in binary inspiral of strange quark stars.arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2504.07659. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2504. 07659. Frontiers 26 Alford et al.Bulk viscosity and damping timescales

    2025 doi

  25. [34]

    Bulk viscosity of strange quark matter, damping of quark star vibration, and the maximum rotation rate of pulsars.Phys

    Madsen J. Bulk viscosity of strange quark matter, damping of quark star vibration, and the maximum rotation rate of pulsars.Phys. Rev. D46(1992) 3290–3295. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.46.3290

    1992 doi

  26. [35]

    Bulk viscosity in hybrid stars.Phys

    Drago A, Lavagno A, Pagliara G. Bulk viscosity in hybrid stars.Phys. Rev. D71(2005) 103004. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.103004

    2005 doi

  27. [36]

    Bulk viscosity in 2SC quark matter.J

    Alford MG, Schmitt A. Bulk viscosity in 2SC quark matter.J. Phys.G34(2007) 67–102. doi:10. 1088/0954-3899/34/1/005

    2007

  28. [37]

    Neutrino emissivity and bulk viscosity of iso-CSL quark matter in neutron stars

    Blaschke DB, Berdermann J. Neutrino emissivity and bulk viscosity of iso-CSL quark matter in neutron stars. Colangelo P, Creanza D, de Fazio F, Fini RA, Nappi E, editors,QCDatWORK 2007: International Workshop on Quantum Chromodynamics: Theory and Experiment(AIP) (2007), Americ...

    2007 doi

  29. [38]

    Bulk viscosity of spin-one color superconductors with two quark flavors.Phys

    Sa’d BA, Shovkovy IA, Rischke DH. Bulk viscosity of spin-one color superconductors with two quark flavors.Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 065016. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.065016

    2007 doi

  30. [39]

    Bulk viscosity of strange quark matter: Urca versus non-leptonic processes.Phys

    Sa’d BA, Shovkovy IA, Rischke DH. Bulk viscosity of strange quark matter: Urca versus non-leptonic processes.Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 125004. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.125004

    2007 doi

  31. [40]

    Anisotropic hydrodynamics, bulk viscosities, and r-modes of strange quark stars with strong magnetic fields.Phys

    Huang XG, Huang M, Rischke DH, Sedrakian A. Anisotropic hydrodynamics, bulk viscosities, and r-modes of strange quark stars with strong magnetic fields.Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 045015. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.045015

    2010 doi

  32. [41]

    non-leptonic weak processes in spin-one color superconducting quark matter.Phys

    Wang X, Malekzadeh H, Shovkovy IA. non-leptonic weak processes in spin-one color superconducting quark matter.Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 045021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.045021

    2010 doi

  33. [42]

    Bulk viscosity of spin-one color superconducting strange quark matter

    Wang X, Shovkovy IA. Bulk viscosity of spin-one color superconducting strange quark matter. Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 085007. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.085007

    2010 doi

  34. [43]

    Neutrino propagation in color superconducting quark matter.Phys

    Carter GW, Reddy S. Neutrino propagation in color superconducting quark matter.Phys. Rev. D62 (2000) 103002. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.62.103002

    2000 doi

  35. [44]

    Diffusion of neutrinos in proto-neutron star matter with quarks

    Steiner AW, Prakash M, Lattimer JM. Diffusion of neutrinos in proto-neutron star matter with quarks. Physics Letters B509(2001) 10–18. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00434-8

    2001 doi

  36. [45]

    Neutrino diffusive transport in hot quark matter: A detailed analysis

    Colvero GC, Lugones G. Neutrino diffusive transport in hot quark matter: A detailed analysis. Phys. Rev. C89(2014) 055803. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.89.055803

    2014 doi

  37. [46]

    Composition and stability of hybrid stars with hyperons and quark color- superconductivity.A&A539(2012) A16

    Bonanno L, Sedrakian A. Composition and stability of hybrid stars with hyperons and quark color- superconductivity.A&A539(2012) A16

    2012

  38. [47]

    Quarkyonic matter and neutron stars.Phys

    McLerran L, Reddy S. Quarkyonic matter and neutron stars.Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 122701. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.122701

    2019 doi

  39. [48]

    Treating quarks within neutron stars.Phys

    Han S, Mamun MAA, Lalit S, Constantinou C, Prakash M. Treating quarks within neutron stars.Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 103022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.103022

    2019 doi

  40. [49]

    Holographic quarkyonic matter.Journal of High Energy Physics2020(2020)

    Kovensky N, Schmitt A. Holographic quarkyonic matter.Journal of High Energy Physics2020(2020)

    2020

  41. [50]

    Stiffening of matter in quark-hadron continuity: a mini-review.arXiv e-prints(2024) arXiv:2412.20442

    Kojo T. Stiffening of matter in quark-hadron continuity: a mini-review.arXiv e-prints(2024) arXiv:2412.20442. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2412.20442

    2024 doi arXiv

  42. [51]

    Momentum shell in quarkyonic matter from explicit duality: A dual model for cold, dense qcd.Phys

    Fujimoto Y , Kojo T, McLerran LD. Momentum shell in quarkyonic matter from explicit duality: A dual model for cold, dense qcd.Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 112701. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.112701

    2024 doi

  43. [52]

    Quark saturation in the qcd phase diagram.Phys

    Bluhm M, Fujimoto Y , McLerran L, Nahrgang M. Quark saturation in the qcd phase diagram.Phys. Rev. C111(2025) 044914. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.111.044914

    2025 doi

  44. [53]

    Inhomogeneous chiral symmetry breaking in dense neutron-star matter

    Buballa M, Carignano S. Inhomogeneous chiral symmetry breaking in dense neutron-star matter. European Physical Journal A52(2016) 57. doi:10.1140/epja/i2016-16057-6. Frontiers 27 Alford et al.Bulk viscosity and damping timescales

    2016 doi

  45. [54]

    Brazovskii–dyugaev effect on the inhomogeneous chiral transition in quark matter.Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics2016(2016) 043D02

    Karasawa S, Lee TG, Tatsumi T. Brazovskii–dyugaev effect on the inhomogeneous chiral transition in quark matter.Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics2016(2016) 043D02. doi:10.1093/ ptep/ptw025

    2016

  46. [55]

    Chiral crystallization in an external magnetic background: Chiral spiral versus real kink crystal.Phys

    Abuki H. Chiral crystallization in an external magnetic background: Chiral spiral versus real kink crystal.Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 054006. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.054006

    2018 doi

  47. [56]

    Magnetic dual chiral density wave: A candidate quark matter phase for the interior of neutron stars.Universe7(2021)

    Ferrer EJ, de la Incera V . Magnetic dual chiral density wave: A candidate quark matter phase for the interior of neutron stars.Universe7(2021). doi:10.3390/universe7120458

    2021 doi

  48. [57]

    Chiral symmetry breaking and phase diagram of dual chiral density wave in a rotating quark matter.Phys

    Tabatabaee Mehr SMA. Chiral symmetry breaking and phase diagram of dual chiral density wave in a rotating quark matter.Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 094042. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.094042

    2023 doi

  49. [58]

    New tool to detect inhomogeneous chiral-symmetry breaking.Phys

    Motta TF, Bernhardt J, Buballa M, Fischer CS. New tool to detect inhomogeneous chiral-symmetry breaking.Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 074030. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.074030

    2025 doi

  50. [59]

    Chiral transition and U(1)A symmetry restoration from lattice QCD using domain wall fermions.Phys

    Bazavov A, Bhattacharya T, Buchoff MI, Cheng M, Christ NH, Ding HT, et al. Chiral transition and U(1)A symmetry restoration from lattice QCD using domain wall fermions.Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 094503. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.094503

    2012 doi

  51. [60]

    Axial U(1) symmetry near the pseudocritical temperature in Nf = 2 + 1 lattice QCD with chiral fermions.PoSLA TTICE2023 (2024) 185

    Aoki S, Aoki Y , Fukaya H, Hashimoto S, Kanamori I, Kaneko T, et al. Axial U(1) symmetry near the pseudocritical temperature in Nf = 2 + 1 lattice QCD with chiral fermions.PoSLA TTICE2023 (2024) 185. doi:10.22323/1.453.0185

    2024 doi

  52. [61]

    The role of the ua(1) breaking term in dynamical chiral symmetry breaking of chiral effective theories.Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics 2021(2021) 093D02

    Kono S, Jido D, Kuroda Y , Harada M. The role of the ua(1) breaking term in dynamical chiral symmetry breaking of chiral effective theories.Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics 2021(2021) 093D02. doi:10.1093/ptep/ptab084

    2021 doi

  53. [62]

    Inhomogeneous chiral condensates in three-flavor quark matter.Phys

    Carignano S, Buballa M. Inhomogeneous chiral condensates in three-flavor quark matter.Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 014026. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.014026

    2020 doi

  54. [63]

    Impacts of the U (1)A anomaly on nuclear and neutron star equation of state based on a parity doublet model.Phys

    Gao B, Minamikawa T, Kojo T, Harada M. Impacts of the U (1)A anomaly on nuclear and neutron star equation of state based on a parity doublet model.Phys. Rev. C106(2022) 065205. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevC.106.065205

    2022

  55. [64]

    Hadronization in the su(3) nambu–jona-lasinio model.Phys

    Rehberg P, Klevansky SP, H¨ufner J. Hadronization in the su(3) nambu–jona-lasinio model.Phys. Rev. C53(1996) 410–429. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.53.410

    1996 doi

  56. [66]

    Color superconductivity in dense quark matter

    Alford MG, Schmitt A, Rajagopal K, Sch ¨afer T. Color superconductivity in dense quark matter. Reviews of Modern Physics80(2008) 1455–1515. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.80.1455

    2008 doi

  57. [67]

    Phase diagram of neutral quark matter: Self-consistent treatment of quark masses.Phys

    R¨uster SB, Werth V , Buballa M, Shovkovy IA, Rischke DH. Phase diagram of neutral quark matter: Self-consistent treatment of quark masses.Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 034004. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD. 72.034004

    2005 doi

  58. [68]

    Phase diagram of three-flavor quark matter under compact star constraints.Phys

    Blaschke D, Fredriksson S, Grigorian H, ¨Oztas ¸AM, Sandin F. Phase diagram of three-flavor quark matter under compact star constraints.Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 065020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72. 065020

    2005 doi

  59. [69]

    Phase diagram of neutral quark matter in nonlocal chiral quark models.Phys

    G´omez Dumm D, Blaschke DB, Grunfeld AG, Scoccola NN. Phase diagram of neutral quark matter in nonlocal chiral quark models.Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 114019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.73.114019

    2006 doi

  60. [70]

    Equilibrium composition and neutrino emissivity of interacting quark matter in neutron stars.ApJ267(1983) 358–370

    Duncan RC, Shapiro SL, Wasserman I. Equilibrium composition and neutrino emissivity of interacting quark matter in neutron stars.ApJ267(1983) 358–370. doi:10.1086/160875

    1983 doi

  61. [71]

    Neutrino emissivity of interacting quark matter in neutron stars

    Duncan RC, Wasserman I, Shapiro SL. Neutrino emissivity of interacting quark matter in neutron stars. II - Finite neutrino momentum effects.ApJ278(1984) 806–812. doi:10.1086/161850. Frontiers 28 Alford et al.Bulk viscosity and damping timescales

    1984 doi

  62. [72]

    Beta Decay in Quark Stars.Phys

    Burrows A. Beta Decay in Quark Stars.Phys. Rev. Lett.44(1980) 1640–1643. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.44.1640

    1980

  63. [73]

    Rate of the weak reaction s+u→u+d in quark matter.Phys

    Madsen J. Rate of the weak reaction s+u→u+d in quark matter.Phys. Rev. D47(1993) 325–330. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.47.325

    1993 doi

  64. [74]

    Bulk viscosity of neutron-star matter.Phys

    Jones PB. Bulk viscosity of neutron-star matter.Phys. Rev. D64(2001) 084003. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.64.084003

    2001

  65. [75]

    Direct Urca neutrino rate in color superconducting quark matter.Phys

    Jaikumar P, Roberts CD, Sedrakian A. Direct Urca neutrino rate in color superconducting quark matter.Phys. Rev. C73(2006) 042801. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.73.042801. Frontiers 29

    2006 doi

  66. [112]

    doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2020)112

    2020 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.