Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 43 references

Long-range dispersal promotes spatial synchrony but reduces the length and time scales of synchronous fluctuations

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Rare long-range dispersal changes the size and lifetime of out-of-phase clusters in synchronized populations.

desk verdict Solid simulation study; the qualitative claim about long-range dispersal promoting synchrony holds up, but the new quantitative cluster-size result needs validation of the Lorentzian fit and between-run error bars. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.08304 v1 pith:5GAKL6I4 submitted 2025-06-10 q-bio.PE cond-mat.stat-mech

Davi Arrais Nobre , Karen C. Abbott , Jonathan Machta , Alan Hastings This is my paper
classification q-bio.PEcond-mat.stat-mech
keywords spatialsynchronymetapopulationlong-rangedispersalRickermaporderparameterfluctuationcorrelationlengthtransientdynamicsphasetransition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether rare long-range dispersal changes not just whether a metapopulation synchronizes, but the spatial texture and persistence of the synchronous state. Using a noisy Ricker metapopulation on a square lattice in which a fraction $p$ of nearest-neighbor links are temporarily rewired to random sites each time step, it shows that increasing $p$ raises the noise threshold for synchrony and homogenizes the population: out-of-phase patches form smaller clusters, and the system returns to its asymptotic state faster after a global synchronizing event. This matters because real metapopulations often experience occasional long-distance dispersal, and the paper argues that standard pairwise correlation measures miss effects that a global order parameter reveals.

What carries the argument

The central object is the two-cycle variable $m_{j,t}=(-1)^t(X_{j,t+1}-X_{j,t})$, which removes the period-2 oscillation and changes sign only when a patch flips phase. Its spatial average gives the instantaneous synchronization order parameter $m_t$, a global rather than pairwise measure of synchrony, and the connected correlation function $G_t(|r|)=\sum_j (m_{j,t}-m_t)(m_{j+r,t}-m_t)$ captures the spatial scale of phase deviations. The fluctuation correlation length is extracted by fitting the Fourier transform of $G_t$ to a Lorentzian at low wavenumbers, following standard statistical-physics practice. The model itself is the noisy Ricker map on an $L\times L$ square lattice with dynamic rewiring: at each time step, each nearest-neighbor connection is replaced with probability $p$ by a random long-range connection, holding the total emigration fraction $\epsilon$ fixed. This machinery lets the paper separate global synchrony from local spatial correlation and measure both the size and the lifetime of out-of-phase clusters.

What would settle it

Run the same model on an $L=128$ lattice at $\sigma=0.15$ with $p=0$ and $p=0.02$, label connected clusters of out-of-phase patches directly, and compare their mean size with the Lorentzian-derived correlation length; if mean cluster size does not decrease with $p$, or the two measures disagree, the paper's central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that, at fixed total dispersal rate, shifting dispersal from nearest-neighbor to random long-range links moves the phase boundary between asynchronous and synchronous oscillation toward higher noise, shrinks the fluctuation correlation length—the typical size of clusters of subpopulations whose two-cycle phase deviates from the global average—and shortens the equilibration time after a synchronizing event. Near the critical line, the stepping-stone case $p=0$ exhibits long-lived fractal clusters and critical slowing down, while even $p=0.02$ strongly reduces cluster size and transient lifetime. The paper measures this with the global synchronization order parameter $m_t = |(1/N)\sum_j m_{j,t}|$, using $m_{j,t}=(-1)^t(X_{j,t+1}-X_{j,t})$, and with the connected correlation function $G_t(|r|)$ whose low-wavenumber Fourier transform yields the fluctuation correlation length. The conclusion is that long-range dispersal acts as a mixing mechanism that homogenizes phase structure and accelerates relaxation to the asymptotic state.

Load-bearing premise

The central quantitative claim about cluster sizes rests on the assumption that the low-wavenumber Fourier transform of the connected correlation function is Lorentzian, so that the fitted fluctuation correlation length equals the physical size of out-of-phase clusters.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If a small $p$ suffices to shrink out-of-phase clusters and accelerate relaxation, then empirical estimates of extinction risk from pairwise correlations may understate homogenization in species with rare long-distance dispersal.
  • Near the critical noise level, transients can last much longer than ecological observation windows; the paper implies the observed state may reflect a past synchronizing event, not the asymptotic equilibrium, and that this memory is shortened by long-range dispersal.
  • Global order-parameter time series, rather than distance-decay of pairwise correlation, are better at distinguishing transient synchrony from true asymptotic synchrony.
  • Because the result is argued to hold for any over-compensatory density-dependent map, not just the Ricker map, the qualitative predictions should apply broadly to period-2 cyclic populations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Not in the paper: the same dynamic rewiring could be tested on one-dimensional lattices, where nearest-neighbor dispersal alone is thought insufficient for long-range synchrony; the prediction is that very small $p$ would restore synchrony and shorten transients.
  • A testable consequence is that management or conservation estimates based on pairwise correlation decay will underestimate how spatially homogenized populations become when long-range dispersal is present; a global order parameter would reveal the difference.
  • Because long-range dispersal raises synchrony while shortening transients, it may create a trade-off between higher regional extinction risk from synchronized lows and faster recovery after climate-driven synchronizing events.
  • The Lorentzian-fit assumption could be checked directly by cluster-size percolation analysis; if multi-scale clusters persist near criticality, a single correlation length would not fully describe the spatial texture.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper studies a two-dimensional lattice metapopulation of Ricker-type oscillators coupled by nearest-neighbor dispersal plus a tunable fraction p of temporary long-range connections. Starting from a globally synchronized initial condition, the authors examine how p affects the maintenance of spatial synchrony, the spatial scale of out-of-phase fluctuations, and the time needed to reach the asymptotic state. They report that increasing p raises the critical noise level for synchrony, decreases the fluctuation correlation length (interpreted as the size of out-of-phase clusters), and shortens the equilibration time after a synchronizing event. The synchrony-promotion part is supported by order-parameter time series and snapshots; the cluster-size and time-scale claims rely on Fourier-space fitting in Figure 6 and on a companion preprint, respectively.

Significance. If the quantitative claims hold, this is a useful contribution: it moves beyond the familiar result that long-range dispersal promotes synchrony and argues that it also changes the spatial texture of fluctuations and the lifetime of transients, with practical implications for extinction risk and for interpreting short ecological time series. The simulation design is clearly specified and includes a fixed-total-dispersal control, several lattice sizes, multiple noise levels, and an order parameter defined independently of the conclusions. These are genuine strengths. However, the central new length-scale conclusion is currently supported only by an unvalidated Lorentzian fitting procedure with no run-to-run error bars in the asymptotic regime, and the time-scale conclusion is not measured in this manuscript. The underlying ideas are plausible and the qualitative patterns are visible in the snapshots, but the quantitative evidence needs strengthening.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.2 and Figure 6] The manuscript asserts that the connected correlation function G_t(|r|) in Eq. (6) decays exponentially at long distances, but no diagnostic is shown to support that assertion, and the fluctuation correlation length is extracted only by fitting the low-wavenumber Fourier transform to a Lorentzian. This fitted length is the sole quantitative basis for the central claim that long-range dispersal reduces the size of out-of-phase clusters. The concern is concrete: in the p=1 limit, dispersal is distance-independent and G_t(r) for r>0 should be essentially flat, so its Fourier transform is not Lorentzian and a Lorentzian fit cannot meaningfully identify an exponential decay length. Please validate the assumed functional form in real space (e.g., log-linear plots of G_t versus r) and/or measure cluster sizes directly from the snapshots, then show that the fitted xi corresponds to the physical cluster size.
  2. [Figure 6 caption and Section 2.3] The asymptotic panels of Figure 6 are computed from 100 snapshots of a single simulation run per parameter set, with no run-to-run error bars. Near the critical line, where the paper itself emphasizes large fluctuations and long transients, single-run estimates of a correlation length are especially unreliable, and a systematic fitting bias cannot be distinguished from a real p-dependent trend. Multiple independent runs with error bars are needed before the quantitative length-scale claim can be assessed.
  3. [Abstract, Section 4, Figure 4] The abstract and the title claim that long-range dispersal reduces the time scale of synchronous fluctuations, but no equilibration-time statistic is defined or measured in this manuscript. The evidence consists of visual inspection of the order-parameter time series in Figure 4 and a citation to Nobre et al. 2025, which is an arXiv preprint. Please either define and measure a relaxation time (for example, the time for the order parameter to reach its asymptotic plateau, or an autocorrelation time) or explicitly attribute the time-scale claim to prior work rather than presenting it as a new result of this paper.
  4. [Figure 3 and Section 3] The phase diagram separating synchronous and asynchronous states is imported entirely from Nobre et al. 2025, including the critical line used to assign solid/open symbols in Figure 6. Because that source is an unpublished preprint, readers cannot independently verify the classification of the simulated points. The authors should either provide the critical-point methodology and results in this paper or otherwise make the phase diagram reproducible without relying on an inaccessible source.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Equation (1)] The quantity z_j is not clearly defined for the rewired network; the rewiring procedure can change local degrees, so please specify how z_j is updated and whether multiple simultaneous rewires are allowed.
  2. [Figure 4 caption] The caption contains a typo: "for p = 0.165" should read "for σ = 0.165".
  3. [References] Several references contain typographical errors, for example "Syncrhony" in Liebhold et al. (2004) and "Stensetii" in Bjørnstad et al. (1999); these should be corrected.
  4. [Section 2, after Eq. (6)] The sentence contains a duplicate article: "where the the distance between habitat patches" should be "where the distance between habitat patches".
  5. [Section 2] The statement that the functional form of f does not qualitatively affect the results is not supported by any simulation or reference in this manuscript; please add supporting evidence or soften the claim.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular reduction found: the cluster-size and equilibration-time claims are direct simulation measurements, with only minor self-citations that are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The synchronization order parameter m_t (Eq. 5) and the connected correlation function G_t(|r|) (Eq. 6) are defined independently of the paper's conclusions, and the fluctuation correlation length is obtained by a standard Lorentzian fit to the low-wavenumber Fourier transform of G_t, following statistical-physics references (Janke 2008; Janke et al. 1994; Grigera 2021). The claim that long-range dispersal reduces fluctuation length scales is a comparison of these fitted lengths across p, not a parameter fitted to reproduce that trend. The p=1 concern raised by the skeptic is a methodological validity question about whether the Lorentzian form is appropriate, not a circularity; it belongs to correctness risk. Several passages cite the authors' own prior work, notably Nobre et al. 2025 for the phase boundary (Section 3, Figure 3) and for rigorous measurement of shorter equilibration times, and Noble et al. 2015 for the order-parameter and Ising universality. These self-citations supply context and quantitative critical-line values, but the present paper's own Figures 2, 4, and 6 independently illustrate the same synchrony-promotion and transient-time behaviors, so the central claims do not reduce to the self-citation chain. No equation is defined in terms of the quantity it is used to predict, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The main caveats are the unvalidated exponential-decay/Lorentzian assumption and single-run asymptotic panels in Figure 6, both of which are empirical and methodological limitations rather than circular steps.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical or biological entities. Its central claim rests on hand-chosen model parameters, an independence assumption for environmental noise, an asserted universality across overcompensatory maps, and an imported phase boundary from the authors' own previous work.

free parameters (4)
  • Dispersal rate epsilon = 0.025
    Fixed total emigration in all simulations; comparisons across p hold this constant, so conclusions may depend on this coupling strength.
  • Ricker growth rate r = 2.3
    Chosen for a period-2 cycle; the claim that results extend to other overcompensatory maps is asserted, not demonstrated here.
  • Noise standard deviation sigma = 12 values in [0.14, 0.195]
    The chosen noise interval spans synchronous to asynchronous regimes, but quantitative positions relative to the critical line depend on this hand-chosen range.
  • Initial condition mean and standard deviation = normal(1.6, 0.2)
    Chosen to represent a strong global synchronizing event; equilibration-time results are conditioned on this starting state.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Noise is multiplicative log-normal and independent across sites and time.
    The model excludes spatially correlated environmental noise, so dispersal is the only mechanism that can maintain synchrony after the initial condition. This isolates the dispersal effect but limits ecological generality.
  • domain assumption The functional form of local density dependence does not qualitatively change the results as long as it is overcompensatory.
    Asserted in Section 2 with citations to Noble et al. 2015 and Pathria and Beale 2011, but not tested under the dynamic rewiring protocol used here.
  • domain assumption The critical noise line separating synchronous and asynchronous states is taken from Nobre et al. 2025.
    Section 3 states that determining the critical noise requires methods outside the scope of this report and refers to the authors' earlier work. If that line is inaccurate, classifications of parameter points as synchronous or asynchronous would weaken.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Long-range dispersal promotes spatial synchrony but reduces the length and time scales of synchronous fluctuations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5GAKL6I4

@misc{pith2026250608304,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Long-range dispersal promotes spatial synchrony but reduces the length and time scales of synchronous fluctuations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5GAKL6I4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.08304}
}
read the original abstract

Synchronous oscillations of spatially disjunct populations are widely observed in ecology. Even in the absence of spatially synchronized exogenous forces, metapopulations may synchronize via dispersal. For many species, most dispersal is local, but rare long-distance dispersal events also occur. While even small amounts of long-range dispersal are known to be important for processes like invasion and spatial spread rates, their potential influence on population synchrony is often overlooked, since local dispersal on its own can be strongly synchronizing. In this work, we investigate the effect of random, rare, long-range dispersal on the spatial synchrony of a metapopulation and find profound effects not only on synchrony but also on properties of the resulting spatial patterns. While controlling for the overall amount of emigration from each local subpopulation, we vary the fraction of dispersal that occurs locally (to nearest neighbors) versus globally (to random locations, irrespective of distance). Using a metric that measures the instantaneous level of global synchrony, we show that this form of long-range dispersal significantly favors the spatially synchronous state and homogenizes the population by decreasing the size of clusters of subpopulations that are out of phase with the rest of the metapopulation. Moreover, the addition of non-local dispersal significantly decreases the equilibration time of the metapopulation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.08304 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Shown in (a) is the time series of the population abundance according to the noisy Ricker map defined in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. From the snapshots, we can observe both global synchrony (where more overall similarity in color indicates higher synchrony) and spatial pattern (i.e., whether like colors are clumped or scattered across the lattice). We see that all populations remain synchronous at a low noise level, with a few patches of populations (orange in these snapshots) in the opposite phase of oscillation arising due to noise, especially … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Snapshots of the population first difference (Equation (3), or equivalently the two-cycle variable (Equation (4)) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Phase diagram showing the critical line that separates the spatially synchronous and the spatially asynchronous [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Order parameter time series for the first 100 time steps of the simulation. Note that all time series start [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Correlation of the time series of first difference in population abundances at sites separated by a given distance. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Fluctuation correlation length as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Does the pattern of population synchrony through space reveal if the moran effect is acting? Oikos 116, 903–912

    Abbott, K.C., 2007. Does the pattern of population synchrony through space reveal if the moran effect is acting? Oikos 116, 903–912

    work page 2007

  2. [2]

    A dispersal-induced paradox: synchrony and stability in stochastic metapopula- tions

    Abbott, K.C., 2011. A dispersal-induced paradox: synchrony and stability in stochastic metapopula- tions. Ecol. Lett. 14, 1158–1169

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    Migration alone can produce persistence of host-parasitoid models

    Adler, F.R., 1993. Migration alone can produce persistence of host-parasitoid models. Am. Nat. 141, 642–650

    work page 1993

  4. [4]

    Synchronization and stability in noisy population dynamics

    Araujo, S.B.L., de Aguiar, M.A.M., 2008. Synchronization and stability in noisy population dynamics. Phys. Rev. E 77, 022903

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    Evolution of dispersal, in: Hastings, A., Gross, L.J

    Baskett, M., 2012. Evolution of dispersal, in: Hastings, A., Gross, L.J. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Theo- retical Ecology. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, California, pp. 377–385. Bjørnstad, O.N., Stensetii, N.C., Saitoh, T., 1999. Synchrony and scaling in dynamics of voles and mice in northern japan. Ecology 80, 622–637

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    Measuring and testing spatial synchrony

    Buonaccorsi, J.P., Elkinton, J.S., Evans, S.R., Liebhold, A.M., 2001. Measuring and testing spatial synchrony. Ecology 82, 1668–1679

    work page 2001

  7. [7]

    Detection of imperfect population synchrony in an uncertain world

    Cazelles, B., Stone, L.S., 2003. Detection of imperfect population synchrony in an uncertain world. J. Anim. Ecol. 72, 953–968. 17

    work page 2003

  8. [8]

    Non-random dispersal in the butterfly maniola jurtina: implications for metapopulation models

    Conradt, L., Bodsworth, E.J., Roper, T.J., Thomas, C.D., 2000. Non-random dispersal in the butterfly maniola jurtina: implications for metapopulation models. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267, 1505–1510

    work page 2000

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    Stochastic spatial models

    Durrett, R., Levin, S., 1999. Stochastic spatial models. SIAM 41, 677–718

    1999

  2. [10]

    Stochastic spatial models: a user’s guide to ecological applications

    Durrett, R., Levin, S.A., 1994. Stochastic spatial models: a user’s guide to ecological applications. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 343, 329–350

    1994

  3. [11]

    Density dependent resource budget model for alternate bearing

    Esmaeili, S., Hastings, A., Abbott, K., Machta, J., Nareddy, V.R., 2021. Density dependent resource budget model for alternate bearing. J. Theor. Biol. 509, 110498

    2021

  4. [12]

    Noise-induced versus intrinsic oscillation in ecological systems

    Esmaeili, S., Hastings, A., Abbott, K.C., Machta, J., Nareddy, V.R., 2022. Noise-induced versus intrinsic oscillation in ecological systems. Ecol. Lett. 25, 814–827

    2022

  5. [13]

    Ecological processes can synchronize marine popula- tion dynamics over continental scales

    Gouhier, T.C., Guichard, F., Menge, B.A., 2010. Ecological processes can synchronize marine popula- tion dynamics over continental scales. PNAS 107 (18), 8281–8286

    2010

  6. [14]

    Correlation functions as a tool to study collective behaviour phenomena in bio- logical systems

    Grigera, T.S., 2021. Correlation functions as a tool to study collective behaviour phenomena in bio- logical systems. J.Phys.Complex. 2, 045016

    2021

  7. [15]

    Complex interactions between dispersal and dynamics: Lessons from coupled logistic equations

    Hastings, A., 1993. Complex interactions between dispersal and dynamics: Lessons from coupled logistic equations. Ecology 34, 1362–1372

    1993

  8. [16]

    Persistence of transients in spatially structure ecological models

    Hastings, A., Higgins, K., 1994. Persistence of transients in spatially structure ecological models. Science 263, 1133–1136

    1994

  9. [17]

    Occasional long distance dispersal increases spatial synchrony of population cycles

    Hopson, J., Fox, J., 2018. Occasional long distance dispersal increases spatial synchrony of population cycles. J Animal Ecol 116:903

    2018

  10. [18]

    Spatial synchronization of vole population dynamics by predatory birds

    Ims, R.A., Andreassen, H.P., 2000. Spatial synchronization of vole population dynamics by predatory birds. Nature 408, 194–196

    2000

  11. [19]

    Monte carlo methods in classical statistical physics, in: Fehske, H., Schneider, R., Weiße, A

    Janke, W., 2008. Monte carlo methods in classical statistical physics, in: Fehske, H., Schneider, R., Weiße, A. (Eds.), Computational Many-Particle Physics. Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 79–140

    2008

  12. [20]

    Single-cluster monte carlo study of the ising model on two-dimensional random lattices

    Janke, W., Katoot, M., Villanova, R., 1994. Single-cluster monte carlo study of the ising model on two-dimensional random lattices. Phys. Rev. B 49(14), 9644–9657

    1994

  13. [21]

    Metapopulation persistence in dynamic landscapes: the role of dispersal distance

    Johst, K., Brandl, R., Eber, S., 2002. Metapopulation persistence in dynamic landscapes: the role of dispersal distance. Oikos 98, 1263–270. 18

    2002

  14. [22]

    Metapopulation moments: coupling, stochasticity and persistence

    Keeling, M.J., 2000. Metapopulation moments: coupling, stochasticity and persistence. J. Anim. Ecol. 69, 725–736

    2000

  15. [23]

    XY model in small-world networks

    Kim, B.J., Hong, H., Holme, P., Jeon, G.S., Minnhagen, P., Choi, M.Y., 2001. XY model in small-world networks. Phys. Rev. E 64(5), 056135

    2001

  16. [24]

    Spatial syncrhony in population dynamics

    Liebhold, A., Koenig, W.D., Bjørnstad, O.N., 2004. Spatial syncrhony in population dynamics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35, 467–490. Mart ´ ı, A.C., Masoller, C., 2003. Delay-induced synchronization phenomena in an array of globally coupled logistic maps. Phys. Rev. E 67, 056219

    2004

  17. [25]

    The statistical analysis of the canadian lynx cycle

    Moran, P.A.P., 1953. The statistical analysis of the canadian lynx cycle. Aust. J. Zool. 1, 291–298

    1953

  18. [26]

    Dynamical ising model of spatially coupled ecological oscillators

    Nareddy, V.R., Machta, J., Abbott, K.C., Esmaeili, S., Hastings, A., 2020. Dynamical ising model of spatially coupled ecological oscillators. J. R. Soc. Interface 17:20200571

    2020

  19. [27]

    Monte Carlo Methods in Statistical Physics

    Newman, M.E.J., Barkema, G.T., 2001. Monte Carlo Methods in Statistical Physics. Oxford University

    2001

  20. [28]

    Emergent long-range synchronization of oscillating eco- logical populations without external forcing described by ising universality

    Noble, A.E., Machta, J., Hastings, A., 2015. Emergent long-range synchronization of oscillating eco- logical populations without external forcing described by ising universality. Nat Commun 6, 6664

    2015

  21. [29]

    Spatial patterns of tree yield explained by endogenous forces through a correspondence between the ising model and ecology

    Noble, A.E., Rosenstock, T.S., Brown, P.H., Machta, J., Hastings, A., 2018. Spatial patterns of tree yield explained by endogenous forces through a correspondence between the ising model and ecology. PNAS 115, 1825:1830

    2018

  22. [30]

    Behavior of ising spins and ecological oscillators on dynamically rewired small world networks

    Nobre, D.A., Abbott, K.C., Machta, J., Hastings, A., 2025. Behavior of ising spins and ecological oscillators on dynamically rewired small world networks. arXiv:2502.10619

    2025 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Pulsed resources and community dynamics of consumers in terrestrial ecosystems

    Ostfeld, R.S., Keesing, F., 2000. Pulsed resources and community dynamics of consumers in terrestrial ecosystems. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15, 232–237

    2000

  24. [32]

    Statistical mechanics

    Pathria, R.K., Beale, P.D., 2011. Statistical mechanics. Butterworth-Heinemann Elsevier, Oxford

    2011

  25. [33]

    Pair approximations, in: Hastings, A., Gross, L.J

    Payne, J.L., 2012. Pair approximations, in: Hastings, A., Gross, L.J. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Theoret- ical Ecology. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, California, pp. 943–948

    2012

  26. [34]

    Direct coupling: a pos- sible strategy to control fruit production in alternate bearing

    Prasad, A., Sakai, K., Hoshino, Y., 2017. Direct coupling: a pos- sible strategy to control fruit production in alternate bearing. Sci. Rep. 7 (39890), 1–11. 19

    2017

  27. [35]

    Synchronization of animal population dynamics by large-scale climate

    Prost, E., Forchhammer, M.C., 2002. Synchronization of animal population dynamics by large-scale climate. Nature 420, 168–171

    2002

  28. [36]

    Spatially autocorrelated disturbances and patterns in population synchrony

    Ranta, E., Veijo, K., Lindstr¨ oom, J., 1999. Spatially autocorrelated disturbances and patterns in population synchrony. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 266, 1851–1856

    1999

  29. [37]

    Stability, variability, and persistence in host-parasitoid systems

    Reeve, J.D., 1990. Stability, variability, and persistence in host-parasitoid systems. Ecology 71, 422– 426

    1990

  30. [38]

    Stock and recruitment

    Ricker, W.E., 1954. Stock and recruitment. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 11(5), 558–623. de Roos, A.M., McCauley, E., Wilson, W.G., 1998. Pattern formation and the spatial scale of interaction between predators and their prey. Theor. Popul. Biol. 53, 108–130

    1954

  31. [39]

    Pollen coupling of forest trees: Forming synchronized and periodic repro- duction out of chaos

    Satake, A., Iwasa, Y., 2000. Pollen coupling of forest trees: Forming synchronized and periodic repro- duction out of chaos. J. Theor. Biol. 203, 63–84

    2000

  32. [40]

    Effects of noise on some dynamical models in ecology

    Schaffer, W.M., Ellner, S., Kot, M., 1986. Effects of noise on some dynamical models in ecology. J. Math. Biol. 24, 479–523. Sol´ e, R.V., 2011. Phase transitions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey

    1986

  33. [41]

    Spatial and temporal patterns of small rodent population dynamics at a regional scale

    Steen, H., Ims, R.A., Sonerud, G.A., 1996. Spatial and temporal patterns of small rodent population dynamics at a regional scale. Ecology 77, 85–95

    1996

  34. [42]

    Frequency entrainment of a phase coherent attractor

    Stone, E.F., 1992. Frequency entrainment of a phase coherent attractor. Phys. Lett. A 163, 367–374

    1992

  35. [43]

    Animal dispersal, in: Hastings, A., Gross, L.J

    Yates, G., Boyce, M.S., 2012. Animal dispersal, in: Hastings, A., Gross, L.J. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Theoretical Ecology. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, California, pp. 369–376. 20

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.