Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Crust (Unified) Tool for Equation-of-state Reconstruction (CUTER) v2

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read CUTER v2 lets any high-density neutron-star equation of state be completed with a consistent nuclear-physics crust, reproducing the original tidal deformability within 0.1% for typical masses.

desk verdict Solid, honest tool paper: real extensions in outer-crust reconstruction and free-format input, clean validation, and the main caveat is a disclosed fallback tested only on nucleonic EoSs. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.08658 v1 pith:JTPGH4G3 submitted 2025-06-10 astro-ph.HE nucl-th

P. J. Davis , H. Dinh Thi , A. F. Fantina , F. Gulminelli , M. Oertel , L. Suleiman This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HEnucl-th
keywords neutronstarequationofstatecrust-corematchingunifiedEoStidaldeformabilityoutercrustreconstructionnuclearmetamodelcompressibleliquid-dropmodelgravitationalwaveinference
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Neutron-star observations are interpreted through an equation of state (EoS), and a common source of error is the ad hoc joining of a separately computed crust to a high-density core EoS. CUTER v2 is a tool that reconstructs a thermodynamically consistent low-density crust for an arbitrary input EoS, either the whole crust or only the outer crust. Validation on nucleonic EoSs shows the reconstructed unified EoSs reproduce the original tidal deformability within about 0.1% for typical neutron-star masses and within about 1% at the extremes. The paper also shows that a missing outer crust can shift computed radii by a few percent at 1.4 solar masses and up to about 10% for very low-mass neutron stars, so the tool removes a bias that matters at the precision of current observations.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is an inversion procedure around a nuclear metamodel. Starting from an input $\beta$-equilibrated EoS, the tool extracts the nucleonic energy per baryon, solves for the $\beta$-equilibrium asymmetry at several subsaturation densities, and obtains the isovector empirical parameters by matrix inversion from the input isoscalar parameters. The crust is then generated by minimizing the energy of a Wigner-Seitz cell in a compressible liquid-drop model with a one-component plasma; the outer crust uses analytical fits of the Brussels-Montreal BSk24 functional. The matching rule is the Gibbs condition ($P_{\rm oc}=P_{\rm ic}$ and $\mu_{B,\rm oc}=\mu_{B,\rm ic}$) at the outer-inner crust boundary, with a fallback to stitching at the lowest entry of the input table.

What would settle it

Take a fully unified EoS with an exotic core and a self-consistently computed crust, remove the outer crust, reconstruct it with CUTER v2, and compare the mass-radius and tidal-deformability curves to the original; the claim of bias-free reconstruction predicts agreement at the 0.1% level, so a deviation larger than that would falsify the proxy assumption.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

CUTER v2 claims that any beta-equilibrated high-density equation of state can be completed into a unified, thermodynamically consistent neutron-star EoS without sacrificing the predictions of the original model. In the whole-crust mode, the tool reads the input energy density as a function of baryon density and extracts from it the nuclear parameters that control the symmetry-energy behaviour by matching the input to a nuclear metamodel; it then builds the outer and inner crust with a compressible liquid-drop model and joins it at the calculated crust-core transition. In the outer-crust mode, it repairs or replaces a missing or inconsistent outer crust using analytical representations of the BSk24 or BSk22 outer-crust EoS, stitching at the Gibbs-consistent point where pressure and baryon chemical potential agree with the inner crust, or at the lowest table entry if no such point exists. In the validation, the reconstructed EoSs reproduce the originals' tidal deformability within about 0.1% for typical neutron-star masses and within about 1% at the extremes; switching between the BSk22 and BSk24 outer crusts changes the tidal deformability by less than about 0.05%.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the analytical outer-crust model from the BSk24 nuclear functional is a safe stand-in for the outer crust of any input equation of state; the paper validates this only for nucleonic cores, so it is unverified for exotic compositions such as hyperonic or quark matter.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A user-supplied high-density EoS can be turned into a unified EoS whose crust and core are mutually consistent, so neutron-star structure and gravitational-wave parameter estimation no longer inherit the crust-matching bias of non-unified tables.
  • EoSs that lack an outer crust or contain unphysical pressure or enthalpy jumps can be repaired automatically, which matters because an absent outer crust changes computed radii by a few percent at 1.4 solar masses and up to about 10% for very low-mass neutron stars.
  • The whole-crust reconstruction preserves the original EoS's predictions: for the tested nucleonic EoSs, tidal deformability is reproduced within about 0.1% for typical masses and within about 1% at the extremes.
  • The reconstructed unified versions of the APR, DDFGOS(APR), and ABHT(QMC-RMF1) EoSs are provided as ready-to-use tables, so the improvement is directly usable in analyses.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's own caveat is that validation covered only nucleonic EoSs; if the BSk24 outer-crust proxy is as composition-insensitive as the nucleonic results suggest, the same tool should extend to hyperonic or quark-matter EoSs, but that remains untested.
  • The sub-0.05% stability of tidal deformability across BSk22 and BSk24 outer crusts implies that for gravitational-wave analyses the outer-crust model choice is subdominant, whereas radius measurements of low-mass stars are where crust reconstruction will matter most.
  • A natural extension is to embed CUTER v2 in Bayesian EoS inference as a prior-preserving mapping, completing every sampled high-density EoS with a consistent crust instead of attaching a fixed one, thus reducing systematic uncertainty in inferred masses and radii.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents CUTER v2, an open-source numerical tool for constructing unified neutron-star crust equations of state from a user-supplied high-density beta-equilibrated EoS. Two functionalities are described: the whole-crust reconstruction, which combines a metamodel with isoscalar empirical parameters and solves Eq. (7) for the isovector parameters before building the crust with a compressible liquid-drop model, and the outer-crust reconstruction, which replaces a missing or inconsistent outer crust with an analytic BSk24/BSk22 outer-crust EoS. The code is validated against existing unified EoSs (RG(SLY4), GPPVA(DDME2)) and applied to non-unified EoSs (APR(APR), DDFGOS(APR), ABHT(QMC-RMF1)). The reported errors on tidal deformability and radius are typically below about 0.1% for M > 1 solar mass and up to a few percent in extreme cases. The reconstructed unified EoSs are made publicly available on CompOSE.

Significance. If the tool performs as claimed, it directly addresses a known source of bias in neutron-star and gravitational-wave inference, namely the use of non-unified crust-core EoSs. The strengths of the paper are the public release of the code, the quantitative validation against multiple EoSs, the honest reporting of deviations, and the dissemination of unified versions of widely used EoSs. At the same time, the reconstruction is a self-consistent re-expression of the input EoS rather than an independent prediction, and the central 'arbitrary EoS' claim is currently supported only by tests on nucleonic models. These limitations are fixable and do not invalidate the tool's value for its demonstrated domain.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sect. 2.2] When no point satisfying P_oc = P_ic and mu_B,oc = mu_B,ic exists, the outer-crust functionality stitches the reconstructed BSk outer crust at the lowest table entry of the original EoS. This fallback can, in general, produce a discontinuity in pressure and baryon chemical potential, which is exactly the kind of non-unified artifact the tool is intended to remove. The validation in Fig. 3 demonstrates only a single case (VGBCMR(D1M*), cut at n_B about 1e-4 fm^-3) and does not quantify the size of the induced jump. Because the abstract claims the tool allows one to 'consistently match a nuclear-physics informed crust to an arbitrary higher density EoS', the manuscript should either restrict that claim to Gibbs-matched cases, add a diagnostic that warns the user when the fallback is activated, or provide evidence that the discontinuity is negligible for a broad class of inputs.
  2. [Sects. 3.1 and 3.2] All validation and application examples use nucleonic EoSs (RG(SLY4), GPPVA(DDME2), APR(APR), DDFGOS(APR), ABHT(QMC-RMF1), VGBCMR(D1M*)). The abstract and Sect. 2 claim applicability to 'an arbitrary higher density EoS', but the whole-crust inversion assumes nucleonic degrees of freedom and no muons (Eqs. (1) and (2)), while the outer-crust reconstruction assumes the BSk24 outer crust as a representative proxy. These assumptions are untested for hyperonic or quark-matter EoSs, where the input table may have a different composition near the matching densities. Please either test at least one exotic-matter EoS or soften the 'arbitrary' claim to something like 'nucleonic EoSs' or 'EoSs with a nucleonic crust'.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sect. 2.2] The word 'garantees' should be 'guarantees'.
  2. [Table 1] The caption contains 'ABHT(QMC-RFT1)'; this should be 'ABHT(QMC-RMF1)'.
  3. [Table 1] For APR(APR), the reconstructed Lsym at order 2 is 37.5 MeV versus the original 57.6 MeV; this large difference is not commented on in the text and should be explained or at least mentioned.
  4. [Eq. (7)] The notation 'Delta m_np c^2' is used without an explicit definition; please define it as (m_n - m_p)c^2.
  5. [Appendix A] The user-specified mass m_B in Eq. (A3) fixes the log-enthalpy integration constant and therefore affects the reconstructed baryon density and chemical potential; the text should explicitly warn that choosing m_B differently from the nucleon mass changes the output normalization.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity found: the whole-crust reconstruction is an explicit inversion/consistency construction validated as a code check, and the outer-crust functionality is tested against an independent BSk24 crust.

full rationale

This is a software/tool paper, not a first-principles derivation, and the central claim is that CUTER v2 constructs unified, thermodynamically consistent EoSs. The whole-crust functionality determines the isovector empirical parameters by solving Eq. (7) so that the metamodel of Eqs. (5)-(6) reproduces the user-supplied beta-equilibrated EoS along the equilibrium line; this is openly described as an 'inversion procedure' rather than a hidden fit. The reconstructed crust and crust-core transition are then obtained from the same functional by an independent CLDM minimization (Eqs. (11)-(16)), and the comparison with the original EoSs in Figs. 1-2 and 4-6 is presented as validation of the numerical implementation, not as a new empirical prediction. The agreement in Lambda-M to about 0.1% is not statistically forced because the inhomogeneous crust and the transition density are not fitted to the original crust; for example, the SLy4 transition density is 0.052 fm^-3 in the original EoS versus 0.075 fm^-3 in the reconstruction, yet the global properties still agree. The outer-crust functionality stitches the independent analytical BSk24 outer crust to the user's EoS, so its validation against RG(SLY4), GPPVA(DDME2), and VGBCMR(D1M*) is an external comparison: the BSk24 outer crust is not derived from the input EoS. Self-citations, notably Ref. [41] for the whole-crust method, are accompanied by the relevant equations in this paper and by a publicly available code, so they are not load-bearing in a circular way. The paper itself flags the main non-circular limitations: Sect. 4 states that the code 'has been mainly tested on nucleonic EoSs, but can be in principle applied to any EoS', and footnote 7 acknowledges a possible mass-definition inconsistency in Eq. (1). The fallback stitching at the lowest table entry when no Gibbs point exists is a thermodynamic-consistency caveat for exotic EoSs, not a circularity. Overall, no quoted step reduces a prediction to its inputs by definition or by a self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's reconstruction relies on the metamodel/CLDM framework from prior work and on parameters extracted from or supplied for the input EoS. No new physical degrees of freedom are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Isovector empirical parameters (E_sym, L_sym, K_sym, Q_sym, Z_sym) = E_sym ~ 32-33 MeV, L_sym ~ 44-59 MeV for tested EoSs (Table 1)
    These are extracted by solving Eq. (7) at N+1 density points to reproduce the input beta-equilibrated EoS; they are fitted, not independently measured.
  • Isoscalar empirical parameters (n_sat, E_sat, K_sat, Q_sat, Z_sat) = Defaults from BSk24: n_sat=0.1578 fm^-3, E_sat=-16.048 MeV, K_sat=245.5 MeV
    If not supplied by the user, these are fixed to BSk24 values (Sect. 2.1); the values come from prior fits to nuclear data and are treated as inputs.
  • Surface and curvature parameters (sigma_0, sigma_0,c, b_s, beta) = Not quoted in paper; optimized to AME2020 nuclear masses (Sect. 2.1)
    The interface energy parameters are fitted to experimental nuclear masses in prior work and are adopted here.
  • Truncation order N and inversion density points x_j = N=2 (default) or N=3; points from Table 1 of Ref. [41]
    The order and the N+1 subsaturation densities at which Eq. (7) is solved are choices that affect the reconstructed high-order isovector parameters.
  • Madelung constant = 0.896
    Used in the lattice energy expression; taken from the literature.
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption Cold, beta-equilibrated, zero-temperature matter with no muons below saturation density
    Used throughout; valid for mature isolated NSs but excludes temperature effects near the surface (acknowledged in Sect. 2.2).
  • domain assumption The meta-model energy functional (Eqs. 5-10) describes homogeneous nucleonic matter at sub-saturation densities
    Adopted from Ref. [47]; central to the inversion and CLDM.
  • domain assumption One-component plasma / compressible liquid-drop description with spherical Wigner-Seitz clusters and no pasta phases
    Used for inner crust; pasta phases neglected, noted as small impact (Ref. [48]).
  • domain assumption Surface and curvature tension forms (Eqs. 14-16) with parameters from AME2020 mass fits
    Adopted from Refs. [54-56] and mass fits; affects crust composition.
  • domain assumption Thermodynamic consistency matching via Gibbs conditions (P_oc=P_ic, mu_B,oc=mu_B,ic)
    Defines stitching point for outer crust; may fail for some EoSs, so fallback to lowest table entry is provided.
  • domain assumption Beta equilibrium and charge neutrality in each Wigner-Seitz cell
    Standard for catalysed crust; used in variational minimisation.
  • standard math The TOV and tidal Love number equations (Eqs. 17-24) are the correct relativistic structure equations
    Standard general-relativity input for non-rotating NSs.
  • domain assumption The ideal Fermi gas electron EoS (Eq. 4) with relativistic kinematics
    Standard description of electron gas in NS crust.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Crust (Unified) Tool for Equation-of-state Reconstruction (CUTER) v2." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JTPGH4G3

@misc{pith2026250608658,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Crust (Unified) Tool for Equation-of-state Reconstruction (CUTER) v2},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JTPGH4G3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.08658}
}
read the original abstract

The equation of state (EoS) is a needed input to determine the neutron-star global properties and to relate them. It is thus important to provide consistent and unified EoSs to avoid possible biases in the analyses coming from the use of inconsistent EoSs. We propose a numerical tool, CUTER, allowing the user to consistently match a nuclear-physics informed crust to an arbitrary higher density EoS. We present here the second version of this tool, CUTER v2. Two functionalities are available with the CUTER v2 tool, allowing the user to reconstruct either the whole (outer and inner) crust, or the outer crust only. We show that the code, that has been tested and validated for use by the astrophysical community, is able to efficiently perform both tasks, allowing the computation of neutron-star global properties in a consistent way.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The equation of state for neutron stars

    nucl-th 2026-07 unverdicted

    A textbook-style review of the neutron-star equation of state covering the models, experimental and observational constraints, and open questions, with no new result claimed or derived.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Abbott, B.P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T.D., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adams, T., Addesso, P., Adhikari, R.X., Adya, V.B., al.: GW170817: Observa- tion of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral. Phys. Rev. Letters119(16), 161101 (2017) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101 arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2017

  2. [2]

    Astrophys

    Abbott, B.P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T.D., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adams, T., Addesso, P., Adhikari, R.X., Adya, V.B., al.: Gravitational Waves and Gamma- Rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A. Astrophys. J. Lett.848, 13 (2017) https://doi.org/ 10.3847/2041-8213/aa920c arXiv:1710.05834 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2017

  3. [3]

    Astrophys

    Abbott, B.P.,et al.: Multi-messenger Obser- vations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger. Astrophys. J. Lett.848(2), 12 (2017) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9 arXiv:1710.05833 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2017

  4. [4]

    Abbott, B.P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T.D., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adams, T., Addesso, P., Adhikari, R.X., Adya, V.B., al.: GW170817: Measurements of Neutron Star Radii and Equation of State. Phys. Rev. Lett.121(16), 161101 (2018) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.161101 arXiv:1805.11581 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2018

  5. [5]

    Abbott, B.P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T.D., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adams, T., Addesso, P., Adhikari, R.X., Adya, V.B., al.: Properties of the Binary Neu- tron Star Merger GW170817. Phys. Rev. X 9(1), 011001 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevX.9.011001 arXiv:1805.11579 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    Nature467(7319), 1081–1083 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09466 arXiv:1010.5788 [astro-ph.HE]

    Demorest, P.B., Pennucci, T., Ransom, S.M., Roberts, M.S.E., Hessels, J.W.T.: A two- solar-mass neutron star measured using Shapiro delay. Nature467(7319), 1081–1083 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09466 arXiv:1010.5788 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2010

  7. [7]

    Sci- ence340, 1233232 (2013) https://doi.org/10

    Antoniadis, J.,et al.: A Massive Pul- sar in a Compact Relativistic Binary. Sci- ence340, 1233232 (2013) https://doi.org/10. 1126/science.1233232 arXiv:1304.6875 [astro- ph.HE]

    arXiv 2013

  8. [8]

    Nature Astronomy4, 72–76 (2020) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41550-019-0880-2 arXiv:1904.06759 [astro-ph.HE]

    Cromartie, H.T., Fonseca, E., Ransom, S.M., Demorest, P.B., Arzoumanian, Z., Blumer, H., Brook, P.R., DeCesar, M.E., Dolch, T., Ellis, J.A., Ferdman, R.D., Ferrara, E.C., Garver-Daniels, N., Gentile, P.A., Jones, M.L., Lam, M.T., Lorimer, D.R., Lynch, R.S., McLaughlin, M.A., Ng, C., Nice, D.J., Pennucci, T.T., Spiewak, R., Stairs, I.H., Stovall, K., Swigg...

    arXiv 2020

Show all 79 references
  1. [9]

    Astrophys

    Riley, T.E., Watts, A.L., Bogdanov, S., Ray, P.S., Ludlam, R.M., Guillot, S., Arzou- manian, Z., Baker, C.L., Bilous, A.V., Chakrabarty, D., Gendreau, K.C., Hard- ing, A.K., Ho, W.C.G., Lattimer, J.M., Morsink, S.M., Strohmayer, T.E.: A NICER View of PSR J0030+0451: Millisecon...

    2019 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Astrophys

    Riley, T.E., Watts, A.L., Ray, P.S., Bog- danov, S., Guillot, S., Morsink, S.M., Bilous, A.V., Arzoumanian, Z., Choudhury, D., Deneva, J.S., Gendreau, K.C., Harding, A.K., Ho, W.C.G., Lattimer, J.M., Loewen- stein, M., Ludlam, R.M., Markwardt, C.B., Okajima, T., Prescod-Weinst...

    2021 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Astrophys

    Raaijmakers, G., Riley, T.E., Watts, A.L., Greif, S.K., Morsink, S.M., Hebeler, K., Schwenk, A., Hinderer, T., Nissanke, S., Guillot, S., Arzoumanian, Z., Bog- danov, S., Chakrabarty, D., Gendreau, K.C., Ho, W.C.G., Lattimer, J.M., Lud- lam, R.M., Wolff, M.T.: A Nicer View of ...

    2019 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Astrophys

    Miller, M.C., Lamb, F.K., Dittmann, A.J., Bogdanov, S., Arzoumanian, Z., Gendreau, K.C., Guillot, S., Harding, A.K., Ho, W.C.G., Lattimer, J.M., Ludlam, R.M., Mahmoodi- far, S., Morsink, S.M., Ray, P.S., Strohmayer, T.E., Wood, K.S., Enoto, T., Foster, R., Okajima, T., Prigozh...

    2019 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Astrophys

    Miller, M.C., Lamb, F.K., Dittmann, A.J., Bogdanov, S., Arzoumanian, Z., Gendreau, K.C., Guillot, S., Ho, W.C.G., Lattimer, J.M., Loewenstein, M., Morsink, S.M., Ray, P.S., Wolff, M.T., Baker, C.L., Cazeau, T., Manthripragada, S., Markwardt, C.B., Oka- jima, T., Pollard, S., C...

    2021 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Astro- phys

    Salmi, T., Vinciguerra, S., Choudhury, D., Riley, T.E., Watts, A.L., Remillard, R.A., Ray, P.S., Bogdanov, S., Guillot, S., Arzou- manian, Z., Chirenti, C., Dittmann, A.J., Gendreau, K.C., Ho, W.C.G., Miller, M.C., Morsink, S.M., Wadiasingh, Z., Wolff, M.T.: The Radius of PSR ...

    2022 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Astrophys

    Vinciguerra, S., Salmi, T., Watts, A.L., Choudhury, D., Riley, T.E., Ray, P.S., Bog- danov, S., Kini, Y., Guillot, S., Chakrabarty, D., Ho, W.C.G., Huppenkothen, D., Morsink, S.M., Wadiasingh, Z., Wolff, M.T.: An Updated Mass-Radius Analysis of the 2017-2018 NICER Data Set of ...

    2024 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Astrophys

    Rutherford, N., Mendes, M., Svensson, I., Schwenk, A., Watts, A.L., Hebeler, K., Keller, J., Prescod-Weinstein, C., Choudhury, D., Raaijmakers, G., Salmi, T., Timmer- man, P., Vinciguerra, S., Guillot, S., Lat- timer, J.M.: Constraining the Dense Mat- ter Equation of State wit...

    2024 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Aasi, J.,et al.: Advanced LIGO. Class. 16 Quant. Grav.32, 074001 (2015) https: //doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/32/7/074001 arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Acernese, F.,et al.: Virgo detec- tor characterization and data quality: results from the O3 run. Class. Quant. Grav.40(18), 185006 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/acd92d arXiv:2210.15633 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Abbott, R.,et al.: Population of Merging Compact Binaries Inferred Using Gravita- tional Waves through GWTC-3. Phys. Rev. X13(1), 011048 (2023) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevX.13.011048 arXiv:2111.03634 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  12. [20]

    JCAP03, 050 (2020) https: //doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/03/050 arXiv:1912.02622 [astro-ph.CO]

    Maggiore, M.,et al.: Science Case for the Ein- stein Telescope. JCAP03, 050 (2020) https: //doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/03/050 arXiv:1912.02622 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Branchesi, M., Maggiore, M., Alonso, D., Badger, C., Banerjee, B., Beirnaert, F., Belgacem, E., Bhagwat, S., Boileau, G., Borhanian, S., Brown, D.D., Leong Chan, M., Cusin, G., Danilishin, S.L., Degallaix, J., De Luca, V., Dhani, A., Dietrich, T., Dupletsa, U., Foffa, S., Fran...

    2023 arXiv

  14. [22]

    arXiv e- prints, 2109–09882 (2021) https://doi.org/ 10.48550/arXiv.2109.09882 arXiv:2109.09882 [astro-ph.IM]

    Evans, M., Adhikari, R.X., Afle, C., Ballmer, S.W., Biscoveanu, S., Borhanian, S., Brown, D.A., Chen, Y., Eisenstein, R., Gruson, A., Gupta, A., Hall, E.D., Huxford, R., Kamai, B., Kashyap, R., Kissel, J.S., Kuns, K., Landry, P., Lenon, A., Lovelace, G., McCuller, L., Ng, K.K....

    2021 doi arXiv

  15. [23]

    Springer, New York (2007)

    Haensel, P., Potekhin, A.Y., Yakovlev, D.G.: Neutron Stars 1: Equation of State and Struc- ture. Springer, New York (2007)

    2007

  16. [24]

    Living Reviews in Relativity 11(1), 10 (2008) https://doi.org/10.12942/ lrr-2008-10 arXiv:0812.3955 [astro-ph]

    Chamel, N., Haensel, P.: Physics of Neutron Star Crusts. Living Reviews in Relativity 11(1), 10 (2008) https://doi.org/10.12942/ lrr-2008-10 arXiv:0812.3955 [astro-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Reviews of Mod- ern Physics89(1), 015007 (2017) https: //doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.015007 arXiv:1610.03361 [astro-ph.HE]

    Oertel, M., Hempel, M., Kl¨ ahn, T., Typel, S.: Equations of state for supernovae and compact stars. Reviews of Mod- ern Physics89(1), 015007 (2017) https: //doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.015007 arXiv:1610.03361 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  18. [26]

    In: Rezzolla, L., Pizzochero, P., Jones, D.I., Rea, N., Vida˜ na, I

    Burgio, G.F., Fantina, A.F.: Nuclear equation of state for compact stars and supernovae. In: Rezzolla, L., Pizzochero, P., Jones, D.I., Rea, N., Vida˜ na, I. (eds.) The Physics and Astrophysics of Neutron Stars. Astrophysics and Space Science Library, vol. 457, pp. 255–

  19. [27]

    In: Rezzolla, L., Pizzochero, P., Jones, D.I., Rea, N., Vida˜ na, I

    Blaschke, D., Chamel, N.: Phases of dense matter in compact stars. In: Rezzolla, L., Pizzochero, P., Jones, D.I., Rea, N., Vida˜ na, I. (eds.) The Physics and Astrophysics of Neutron Stars. Astrophysics and Space Sci- ence Library, vol. 457, pp. 337–400. Springer, Cham (2018)....

    2018

  20. [28]

    Raduta, A.R., Nacu, F., Oertel, M.: Equations of state for hot neutron stars. Eur. Phys. J. A57(12), 329 (2021) https: //doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00628-z arXiv:2109.00251 [nucl-th]

    2021 arXiv

  21. [29]

    The role of exotic particle degrees of freedom

    Raduta, A.R.: Equations of state for hot neutron stars-II. The role of exotic particle degrees of freedom. Eur. Phys. J. A58(6), 115 (2022) https: //doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00772-0 arXiv:2205.03177 [nucl-th]

    2022 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Astro- phys

    Baym, G., Pethick, C., Sutherland, P.: The Ground State of Matter at High Densities: Equation of State and Stellar Models. Astro- phys. J.170, 299 (1971) https://doi.org/10. 1086/151216

    1971

  23. [31]

    Douchin, F., Haensel, P.: A unified equation of state of dense matter and neutron star structure. Astron. Astrophys.380, 151–167 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361: 20011402 arXiv:astro-ph/0111092 [astro-ph]

    2001 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Greif, S.K., Raaijmakers, G., Hebeler, K., Schwenk, A., Watts, A.L.: Equation of state sensitivities when inferring neutron star and dense matter properties. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.485(4), 5363– 5376 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/ stz654 arXiv:1812.08188 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Landry, P., Essick, R.: Nonparametric inference of the neutron star equation of state from gravitational wave observations. Phys. Rev. D99(8), 084049 (2019) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.084049 arXiv:1811.12529 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Essick, R., Landry, P., Holz, D.E.: Non- parametric inference of neutron star composition, equation of state, and maximum mass with GW170817. Phys. Rev. D101(6), 063007 (2020) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.063007 arXiv:1910.09740 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Essick, R., Landry, P., Schwenk, A., Tews, I.: Detailed examination of astro- physical constraints on the symmetry energy and the neutron skin of 208Pb with minimal modeling assumptions. Phys. Rev. C104(6), 065804 (2021) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.104.065804 arXiv:2107....

    2021 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Raithel, C.A., Most, E.R.: Degeneracy in the Inference of Phase Transitions in the Neutron Star Equation of State from Gravitational Wave Data. Phys. Rev. Lett.130(20), 201403 (2023) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.201403 arXiv:2208.04294 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  29. [37]

    MNRAS529(4), 4650– 4665 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/ stae844 arXiv:2303.17518 [astro-ph.HE]

    Huang, C., Raaijmakers, G., Watts, A.L., Tolos, L., Providˆ encia, C.: Constraining a relativistic mean field model using neu- tron star mass-radius measurements I: nucleonic models. MNRAS529(4), 4650– 4665 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/ stae844 arXiv:2303.17518 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Fortin, M., Providˆ encia, C., Raduta, A.R., Gulminelli, F., Zdunik, J.L., Haensel, P., Bejger, M.: Neutron star radii and crusts: Uncertainties and unified equations of state. Phys. Rev. C94(3), 035804 (2016) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.94.035804 arXiv:1604.01944 [astro-ph.SR]

    2016 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Universe 6(11), 220 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3390/ universe6110220

    Ferreira, M., Providˆ encia, C.: Neutron Star Properties: Quantifying the Effect of the Crust-Core Matching Procedure. Universe 6(11), 220 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3390/ universe6110220

    2020

  32. [40]

    Suleiman, L., Fortin, M., Zdunik, J.L., Haensel, P.: Influence of the crust on the neutron star macrophysical quan- tities and universal relations. Phys. Rev. C104(1), 015801 (2021) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.104.015801 arXiv:2106.12845 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Davis, P.J., Dinh Thi, H., Fantina, A.F., Gulminelli, F., Oertel, M., Suleiman, L.: Inference of neutron-star proper- ties with unified crust-core equations of state for parameter estimation. Astron. Astrophys.687, 44 (2024) https: //doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202348402 arXiv:2...

    2024 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Tolman, R.C.: Static Solutions of Einstein’s Field Equations for Spheres of Fluid. Phys. Rev.55(4), 364–373 (1939) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRev.55.364

    1939 doi

  35. [43]

    Oppenheimer, J.R., Volkoff, G.M.: On Massive Neutron Cores. Phys. Rev.55(4), 374–381 (1939) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRev.55.374

    1939

  36. [44]

    https://compose.obspm.fr

    CompOSE Core Team: CompOSE (Comp- Star Online Supernovae Equations of state). https://compose.obspm.fr

  37. [45]

    Free soft- ware (GPL) (2018)

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Col- laboration, KAGRA Collaboration: L VK Algorithm Library - LALSuite. Free soft- ware (GPL) (2018). https://doi.org/10.7935/ GT1W-FZ16

    2018

  38. [46]

    Cambridge Scientific Pub- lishers, Cambridge (2004)

    Weiss, A., Hillebrandt, W., Thomas, H.-C., Ritter, H.: Cox and Giuli’s Principles of Stellar Structure. Cambridge Scientific Pub- lishers, Cambridge (2004)

    2004

  39. [47]

    Margueron, J., Hoffmann Casali, R., Gulminelli, F.: Equation of state for dense nucleonic matter from metamod- eling. I. Foundational aspects. Phys. Rev. C97(2), 025805 (2018) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.97.025805 arXiv:1708.06894 [nucl-th]

    2018 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Dinh Thi, H., Carreau, T., Fantina, A.F., Gulminelli, F.: Uncertainties in the pasta- phase properties of catalysed neutron stars. Astron. Astrophys.654, 114 (2021) https: //doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202141192 arXiv:2109.13638 [nucl-th]

    2021 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Mondal, C., Gulminelli, F.: Can we decipher the composition of the core of a neutron star? Phys. Rev. D105(8), 083016 (2022) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.083016 arXiv:2111.04520 [nucl-th]

    2022 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Goriely, S., Chamel, N., Pearson, J.M.: Further explorations of Skyrme- Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov mass formulas. XIII. The 2012 atomic mass evalua- tion and the symmetry coefficient. Phys. Rev. C88(2), 024308 (2013) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.88.024308

    2013 doi

  43. [51]

    Carreau, T., Gulminelli, F., Margueron, J.: Bayesian analysis of the crust-core transition with a compressible liquid-drop model. Eur. Phys. J. A55(10), 188 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2019-12884-1 arXiv:1902.07032 [nucl-th]

    2019 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Dinh Thi, H., Fantina, A.F., Gul- minelli, F.: The effect of the energy functional on the pasta-phase proper- ties of catalysed neutron stars. Eur. Phys. J. A57(10), 296 (2021) https: //doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00605-6 arXiv:2111.04374 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Universe7(10), 373 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3390/universe7100373 arXiv:2109.09675 [astro-ph.HE]

    Dinh Thi, H., Mondal, C., Gul- minelli, F.: The Nuclear Matter Density Functional under the Nucleonic Hypothesis. Universe7(10), 373 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3390/universe7100373 arXiv:2109.09675 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Maruyama, T., Tatsumi, T., Voskresensky, D.N., Tanigawa, T., Chiba, S.: Nuclear “pasta” structures and the charge screen- ing effect. Phys. Rev. C72(1), 015802 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC. 72.015802 nucl-th/0503027

    2005 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Astrophys

    Newton, W.G., Gearheart, M., Li, B.-A.: A survey of the parameter space of the compressible liquid drop model as applied to the neutron star inner crust. Astrophys. J. Suppl.204, 9 (2013) https://doi.org/ 10.1088/0067-0049/204/1/9 arXiv:1110.4043 [astro-ph.SR]

    2013 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Ravenhall, D.G., Pethick, C.J., Lattimer, J.M.: Nuclear interface energy at finite tem- peratures. Nucl. Phys. A407, 571–591 (1983) https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(83) 90667-X

    1983 doi

  49. [57]

    Tables, graphs and references

    Wang, M., Huang, W.J., Kondev, F.G., Audi, G., Naimi, S.: The AME 2020 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references. Chinese Physics C45(3), 030003 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/abddaf

    2021 doi

  50. [58]

    Carreau, T., Gulminelli, F., Margueron, 19 J.: General predictions for the neutron star crustal moment of inertia. Phys. Rev. C100(5), 055803 (2019) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.100.055803 arXiv:1810.00719 [nucl-th]

    2019 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Role of symmetry energy

    Pearson, J.M., Chamel, N., Potekhin, A.Y., Fantina, A.F., Ducoin, C., Dutta, A.K., Goriely, S.: Unified equations of state for cold non-accreting neutron stars with Brussels-Montreal functionals - I. Role of symmetry energy. MNRAS481(3), 2994– 3026 (2018) https://doi.org/10.10...

    2018 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Pearson, J.M., Chamel, N., Potekhin, A.Y., Fantina, A.F., Ducoin, C., Dutta, A.K., Goriely, S.: Erratum: Unified equations of state for cold non-accreting neutron stars with Brussels-Montreal functionals. I. Role of symmetry energy. MNRAS486(1), 768– 768 (2019) https://doi.org...

    2019 doi

  53. [61]

    Astrophys

    Hinderer, T.: Tidal Love numbers of neu- tron stars. Astrophys. J.677, 1216–1220 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1086/533487 arXiv:0711.2420 [astro-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Hinderer, T., Lackey, B.D., Lang, R.N., Read, J.S.: Tidal deformability of neutron stars with realistic equations of state and their gravitational wave signatures in binary inspi- ral. Phys. Rev. D81, 123016 (2010) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.81.123016 arXiv:0911.3535 [a...

    2010 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Physics of Particles and Nuclei46, 633–664 (2015) https: //doi.org/10.1134/S1063779615040061

    Typel, S., Oertel, M., Kl¨ ahn, T.: Com- pOSE CompStar online supernova equations of state harmonising the con- cert of nuclear physics and astrophysics compose.obspm.fr. Physics of Particles and Nuclei46, 633–664 (2015) https: //doi.org/10.1134/S1063779615040061

    2015 doi

  56. [64]

    Typel, Oertel, M., Kl¨ ahn, T., Chatterjee, D., Dexheimer, V., Ishizuka, C., Mancini, M., Novak, J., Pais, H., Providˆ encia, C., R

    CompOSE Core Team, S. Typel, Oertel, M., Kl¨ ahn, T., Chatterjee, D., Dexheimer, V., Ishizuka, C., Mancini, M., Novak, J., Pais, H., Providˆ encia, C., R. Raduta, A., Servillat, M., Tolos, L.: CompOSE reference manual. Eur. Phys. J. A58(11), 221 (2022) https: //doi.org/10.1140...

    2022 doi

  57. [65]

    Gulminelli, F., Raduta, A.R.: Unified treat- ment of subsaturation stellar matter at zero and finite temperature. Phys. Rev. C92(5), 055803 (2015) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevC.92.055803 arXiv:1504.04493 [nucl-th]

    2015 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Grill, F., Providˆ encia, C., Avancini, S.S.: Neutron star inner crust and symme- try energy. Phys. Rev. C85(5), 055808 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC. 85.055808 arXiv:1203.4166 [nucl-th]

    2012 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Grill, F., Pais, H., Providˆ encia, C., Vida˜ na, I., Avancini, S.S.: Equation of state and thick- ness of the inner crust of neutron stars. Phys. Rev. C90, 045803 (2014) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevC.90.045803

    2014

  60. [68]

    Chabanat, E., Bonche, P., Haensel, P., Meyer, J., Schaeffer, R.: A Skyrme parametrization from subnuclear to neutron star densities. Nucl. Phys. A627, 710–746 (1997) https: //doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(97)00596-4

    1997 doi

  61. [69]

    Lalazissis, G.A., Niksic, T., Vretenar, D., Ring, P.: New relativistic mean-field interac- tion with density-dependent meson-nucleon couplings. Phys. Rev. C71, 024312 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.71. 024312

    2005 doi

  62. [70]

    Mondal, C., Vi˜ nas, X., Centelles, M., De, J.N.: Structure and composition of the inner crust of neutron stars from Gogny interactions. Phys. Rev. C102(1), 015802 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC. 102.015802 arXiv:2003.03338 [nucl-th]

    2020 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Symmetry 13(9), 1613 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3390/ sym13091613 arXiv:2109.02520 [nucl-th]

    Vi˜ nas, X., Gonzalez-Boquera, C., Cen- telles, M., Mondal, C., Robledo, L.M.: Uni- fied Equation of State for Neutron Stars Based on the Gogny Interaction. Symmetry 13(9), 1613 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3390/ sym13091613 arXiv:2109.02520 [nucl-th]

    2021 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Gonzalez-Boquera, C., Centelles, M., Vi˜ nas, X., Robledo, L.M.: New Gogny interac- tion suitable for astrophysical applications. Phys. Lett. B779, 195–200 (2018) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2018.02.005 arXiv:1712.06735 [nucl-th] 20

    2018 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Akmal, A., Pandharipande, V.R., Raven- hall, D.G.: Equation of state of nucleon matter and neutron star structure. Phys. Rev. C58(3), 1804–1828 (1998) https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevC.58.1804 arXiv:nucl- th/9804027 [nucl-th]

    1998

  66. [74]

    Haensel, P., Pichon, B.: Experimental nuclear masses and the ground state of cold dense matter. Astron. Astro- phys.283(1), 313–318 (1994) https: //doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.nucl-th/9310003 arXiv:nucl-th/9310003 [nucl-th]

    1994 doi arXiv

  67. [75]

    Ducoin, C., Hasnaoui, K.H.O., Napoli- tani, P., Chomaz, P., Gulminelli, F.: Anomalous thermodynamics and phase transitions in neutron star matter. Phys. Rev. C75(6), 065805 (2007) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.75.065805 arXiv:astro-ph/0507633 [astro-ph]

    2007 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Gulminelli, F., Raduta, A.R., Oertel, M., Margueron, J.: Strangeness-driven phase transition in (proto-)neutron star matter. Phys. Rev. C87(5), 055809 (2013) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.87.055809 arXiv:1301.0390 [nucl-th]

    2013 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Constantinou, C., Muccioli, B., Prakash, M., Lattimer, J.M.: Thermal properties of super- nova matter: The bulk homogeneous phase. Phys. Rev. C89(6), 065802 (2014) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.89.065802 arXiv:1402.6348 [astro-ph.SR]

    2014 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Alford, M.G., Brodie, L., Haber, A., Tews, I.: Relativistic mean-field theories for neutron- star physics based on chiral effective field the- ory. Phys. Rev. C106, 055804 (2022) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.106.055804 21

    2022 doi

  71. [335]

    Springer, Cham (2018). Chap. 6. https: //doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97616-7 6

    2018 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.