Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 76 references

Aging of amorphous materials under cyclic strain

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Cyclic driving makes amorphous materials age by a universal logarithmic decay of the energy lost per cycle.

desk verdict Worth reading: the experiments are new and the model comparison is instructive, but the central log-law claim needs statistical support before it can carry the universality conclusion. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.08779 v1 pith:7E2OOIIY submitted 2025-06-10 cond-mat.soft cond-mat.dis-nn

Dor Shohat , Paul Baconnier , Itamar Procaccia , Martin van Hecke , Yoav Lahini This is my paper
classification cond-mat.softcond-mat.dis-nn
keywords physicalagingcyclicdrivinglogarithmicdissipationdecayamorphousmaterialscrumpledsheetsbistablespringnetworkreplicasymmetrybreakingacousticemissioncounting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims a new generic aging phenomenon: when amorphous solids are driven through many slow strain cycles, the energy dissipated per cycle decays as $A_n \sim A_\infty + C \log n$, and that this logarithmic decay is shared by a crumpled sheet, a steel-wool bundle, and a Nitinol wire. The paper further claims that this observation discriminates between mesoscopic models: a non-interacting distribution-of-relaxation-times model and a noisy coupled-hysteron model both fail, while a disordered network of bistable elastic springs reproduces all observations. The network's success is traced to its persistent, slow exploration of a complex energy landscape with signatures of replica symmetry breaking, so cyclic driving becomes a protocol for probing landscape complexity in amorphous materials.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the discrete force increment $X_n(U) = F_{n+1}(U) - F_n(U)$, which near the asymptotic fixed point obeys $X_{n+1} = g(X_n) = X_n - K X_n^2 + \cdots$; the generic absence of a symmetry reason for $K=0$ forces $X_n \sim 1/n$, so that integrating the force over a closed loop yields $\oint F_n(U)\,dU \sim \log n$. The discriminating model is the bistable spring network, a disordered elastic network whose bonds have double-well potentials, continuous degrees of freedom, non-pairwise geometric interactions, and self-organized marginal stability that keeps replenishing low energy barriers.

What would settle it

Repeat the cyclic-driving experiment on one of the three materials for at least $10^4$ to $10^5$ cycles, record per-cycle dissipation with error bars, and fit $A_n = A_0 + C\log n$ against $A_n = A_\infty + a/n^\beta$; if the power-law form fits better over the extended range, or the residuals of the log fit show systematic curvature, the logarithmic-aging claim fails. Also check whether the material creep function's loop remains closed at long times, since the DRT model predicts an open gap at the cycle minimum that would dominate aging.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Three very different amorphous materials, a crumpled Mylar sheet, an amorphous bundle of metallic fibers, and a shape-memory alloy wire in its martensite phase, all exhibit logarithmic aging under cyclic strain: the dissipation per cycle decays as $A_n \sim A_\infty + C \log n$, and the force at each displacement evolves as $F_n(U) \sim C(U) \log n$ where the material creep function $C(U)$ is history dependent and its loop is always faster in the ascending phase. The paper argues this behavior follows from a generic Taylor expansion near the asymptotic fixed point of the force increment, $X_{n+1} = X_n - K X_n^2 + \cdots$, which gives $X_n \sim 1/n$ and hence logarithmic evolution of force and dissipation. Among three candidate mesoscopic models, only the network of bistable elastic bonds reproduces all observations, because it continues to explore new configurations with fewer flipping instabilities per cycle, whereas the hysteron model eventually hops between a small set of limit cycles and stops aging.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim stands or falls on identifying the long-time decay of dissipation per cycle as logarithmic rather than a weak power law, since the experiments cover only about 3000 cycles with a material-dependent crossover regime and the paper reports no error bars or statistical test against power-law fits.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A few thousand cycles of slow strain could serve as a diagnostic: whether dissipation keeps decaying logarithmically indicates whether a material's energy landscape is hierarchical (full replica symmetry breaking) or simple (1-step RSB, which saturates).
  • The material creep function $C(U)$ provides a new, history-dependent fingerprint for amorphous materials, with universal logarithmic aging but material-specific loop shapes.
  • Acoustic emission counting during cyclic driving gives a microscopic check of the model: the number of instability events per cycle decays logarithmically, matching the bistable-spring network.
  • Cyclic driving is more discriminative than static aging for selecting between mesoscopic models of amorphous matter, because the intermediate states visited each cycle probe the landscape repeatedly.
  • In experiments on memory formation, yielding, and fatigue under cyclic drive, long-time aging cannot be neglected: dissipation keeps slowly decreasing and never reaches a steady value within the observed range.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If landscape complexity is the controlling factor, then designer systems with few attractors of interacting hysterons should show saturation of dissipation after a transient, while disordered elastic networks should keep showing logarithmic decay indefinitely; this is directly testable in the laboratory.
  • The protocol sensitivity predicted by the fixed-point argument, strain control giving logarithmic decay versus force control giving a $1/n$ decay, suggests a single material driven under both protocols should exhibit different aging exponents, a clean quantitative test of the generic argument.
  • Because per-cycle dissipation falls as $C\log n$, the total energy absorbed over $n$ cycles grows slightly superlinearly, so fatigue-life estimates based on per-cycle damage should be re-examined for cyclically loaded amorphous components.
  • Counting acoustic clicks may become a cheap proxy for dissipation measurements in other crumpled or fibrous systems, since the paper shows the number of instabilities per cycle tracks the dissipation decay.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports experiments on three amorphous materials—a crumpled Mylar sheet, steel wool, and a Nitinol wire in torsion—under slow cyclic strain. The authors find that, after an initial power-law regime, the dissipation per cycle decays approximately logarithmically with cycle number, and that the force at fixed displacement evolves as C(U) log n. They adapt a scalar-recursion argument from Bandi et al. to strain control, deriving X_n ~ 1/n and F_n ~ log n. They then compare three mesoscopic models: a distribution of relaxation times, a coupled-hysteron model, and a network of bistable elastic springs. Only the network model is reported to reproduce the closed-loop material creep function and the logarithmic decay of dissipation, and the authors connect this success to a dynamical signature of replica symmetry breaking, validated by an out-of-sample acoustic-emission measurement on crumpled sheets.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, this is a valuable unifying observation: logarithmic aging under cyclic drive across very different amorphous materials would provide a generic experimental fingerprint and a discriminating test for mesoscopic models. The acoustic-emission counting of instabilities is a genuine out-of-sample prediction that strengthens the network model. The paper also demonstrates a useful method—comparing static-aging models under cyclic drive—that could be adopted broadly. However, the empirical log-vs-power-law discrimination and the model-selection conclusion are not yet statistically secured, and the theoretical reduction to a scalar recursion is assumed rather than derived.

major comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 2B] The central claim that the asymptotic decay is logarithmic is not statistically supported. The plotted fits A0 + C log n and A∞ + a/n are shown without error bars, and no quantitative comparison is provided—for example, confidence intervals on the exponent β in A∞ + a/n^β, or a model-selection criterion applied over the same n-range. Because the data span at most n ≈ 3000 cycles and show a material-dependent crossover, a weak power law with β ≲ 0.2 is not distinguishable from a logarithm on these data. This ambiguity is load-bearing because the subsequent model-selection conclusion rests on the log form.
  2. [Theoretical argument, Eq. (1)] The reduction of the many-body dynamics to a scalar recursion X_{n+1} = g(X_n) is an assumption rather than a derivation. The force increment at fixed displacement is a low-dimensional projection of a high-dimensional state, and nothing guarantees that the projected dynamics are Markovian or one-dimensional. The paper should either justify this reduction from the underlying dynamics or present it explicitly as a phenomenological ansatz whose validity is tested by the data, rather than as a general theoretical argument.
  3. [Theoretical argument and Fig. 2B] A_n = A0 + C log n with C < 0 is not an admissible asymptotic law because it becomes negative at finite n. The text states that dissipation 'decays first as a power law and eventually logarithmically,' but an unbounded logarithmic decrease cannot be the actual asymptote unless a saturating correction is specified. The authors should define the transient window in which the log form applies and identify the correction (for example, a cutoff or saturation term) that restores a finite limit, or they should weaken the 'asymptotic' characterization.
  4. [Discussion, final paragraph] The manuscript concedes that 'we cannot rule out that there are parameter ranges or interaction types [56] where the hysteron model would become closer to the network model.' This directly qualifies the conclusion that 'only the last model is consistent with all observations.' Since the hysteron model is a primary competitor, the parameter-space exploration should be shown, or the conclusion should be explicitly restricted to the parameter ranges studied. In addition, the distinction between the hysteron power-law exponent α = 0.7 ± 0.15 (Fig. 4B) and the experimental log law should be quantified rather than asserted.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Methods, Crumpled sheets] There is a typo in 'form a a disordered network'; it should read 'form a disordered network.'
  2. [Throughout] Several distinct equations are numbered (2): the hysteron threshold equation, the bond potential, and the integration ODE in the Methods. These should be renumbered sequentially.
  3. [Fig. 3A caption] The caption contains 'response to the4last cycles,' which should read 'the last 4 cycles.'
  4. [Eq. (1) and surrounding text] The recursion X_{n+1} = g(X_n) suppresses the explicit U dependence of X_n(U); the text should state clearly that the recursion is applied at each fixed displacement U along the cycle.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the experimental measurements, model simulations, and the out-of-sample acoustic-click observable carry the argument independently.

full rationale

Walking the claimed derivation chain, I find no circular step that meets the evidentiary bar. The logarithmic dissipation claim is supported directly by measured loop areas A_n in Fig. 2B; the theoretical argument from the map X_{n+1}=X_n−KX_n^2 is a consistency/derivation exercise, and the displayed A_0 + C~ log n line uses C~ obtained from the loop integral of the material creep function C(U), so it is a cross-check between two reductions of the same force-cycle data, not a fit of A_n to itself. The DRT and hysteron models are simulated from prior constructions and fail to reproduce the closed-loop creep function and logarithmic dissipation; that is falsification rather than circular confirmation. The bistable-spring network is imported from the authors' earlier work ([13], [42], [44]), but its parameters are not fit to the new cyclic-aging data, and the acoustic-click count is a separate measured channel with a genuine out-of-sample character. The main weaknesses are correctness and assumption risks rather than circularity: the model-selection conclusion rests on the empirical log-versus-weak-power-law discrimination in Fig. 2B, which is made without error bars or a model-comparison statistic; and Eq. (1) silently assumes the marginal linear coefficient g'(0)=1, whose justification is not given. These concerns affect the strength of the conclusions but do not reduce any prediction to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on a handful of chosen simulation parameters (J0, T, v), on the scalar-recursion reduction in the theoretical argument, on the universality assumption for three materials, on the click-to-instability identification, on the RSB diagnostic, and on parameter transfer from prior papers. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • Hysteron interaction strength J0 = 0.077 (moderate) and 0.01 (weak)
    The dissipation decay exponent α≈0.7 for the hysteron model is obtained at J0=0.077; the claim that this model fails to produce logarithmic aging depends on this coupling, and the authors note other parameter ranges might alter the outcome.
  • Hysteron temperature T = 1e-4
    Used in the finite-temperature cyclic simulations; together with J0 it sets the decay exponent, but no systematic scan over T is reported.
  • Network model temperature T = 0.01 for cyclic (0.1 for static)
    The logarithmic decay of dissipation in the bistable spring network is demonstrated at T=0.01; the log-slope is not compared quantitatively with experiments.
  • Network driving velocity v = tuned so dissipation depends weakly on v (exact value not stated)
    The velocity is chosen following Ref [34] to minimize velocity dependence; the robustness of the logarithmic decay to this choice is not fully explored.
assumptions (5)
  • ad hoc to paper The force increment at fixed displacement follows a one-dimensional recursion X_{n+1}=g(X_n) with g(x)=x-Kx^2+..., so that the many-body dynamics reduces to a scalar map.
    Introduced in the Theoretical Argument (Eq. 1) to derive the logarithmic decay; no justification is given for the reduction or for the generic nonzero K.
  • domain assumption The three materials studied are representative generic amorphous materials, so the observed behavior is universal.
    The 'generic aging phenomenon' is inferred from three specific samples (crumpled Mylar, steel wool, Nitinol wire) without sample-to-sample variability or broader material coverage.
  • domain assumption Acoustic emission clicks in the crumpled sheet correspond to individual snap-through instabilities (bistable flips), and the click count is proportional to the model's N_i, up to a resolution cutoff.
    Used to compare the experimental click decay to the network model's N_i; the microphone resolution causes underestimation and no calibration is provided.
  • domain assumption Full replica symmetry breaking can be diagnosed from the inter-realization distance distribution and distance matrix in finite-size simulations.
    The RSB classification is inferred from the shape of P(d_AB) and the distance matrix (Fig. 7), by analogy with spin glasses, rather than from a computed overlap order parameter.
  • domain assumption The bistable spring network model parameters from Refs [13,42,44] transfer to the experimental systems without re-fitting.
    The model is shown to match experiments qualitatively; no attempt is made to map material-specific constants (stiffness, friction, wire diameter) onto the simulation parameters.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Aging of amorphous materials under cyclic strain." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7E2OOIIY

@misc{pith2026250608779,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Aging of amorphous materials under cyclic strain},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7E2OOIIY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.08779}
}
read the original abstract

Amorphous materials driven away from equilibrium display a diverse repertoire of complex, history-dependent behaviors. One striking feature is a failure to return to equilibrium after an abrupt change in otherwise static external conditions. Instead, amorphous materials often exhibit physical aging: an ever-slowing, nonexponential relaxation that can span a huge range of timescales. Here we examine the aging behavior of three different amorphous materials subjected to slow periodic driving. The results reveal a generic aging phenomenon characterized by a logarithmic decay of dissipation per cycle. This observation is evaluated against several mesoscopic models of amorphous matter that successfully capture aging under static conditions: (i) a collection of noninteracting relaxation processes (ii) a noisy hysteron model with random pairwise interactions, and (iii) a structural model consisting of a random network of bi-stable elastic bonds. We find that only the latter model reproduces all experimental findings and relate its success to its persistent, slow exploration of a complex energy landscape with clear signatures of replica symmetry breaking. Thus, cyclic driving emerges as a simple yet powerful protocol to characterize amorphous materials, probe their complex energy landscapes, and distinguish between different models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.08779 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

  1. [56]

    Baconnier, M

    P. Baconnier, M. H. Teunisse, and M. van Hecke, Prolif- eration and prohibition of self-loops in ensembles of inter- acting binary elements, arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.12658 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    J. P. Sethna, K. A. Dahmen, and C. R. Myers, Crackling noise, Nature410, 242 (2001)

    2001

  3. [2]

    Arceri, F

    F. Arceri, F. P. Landes, L. Berthier, and G. Biroli, A sta- tistical mechanics perspective on glasses and aging, En- cyclopedia of complexity and systems science , 1 (2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [3]

    N. C. Keim, J. D. Paulsen, Z. Zeravcic, S. Sastry, and S. R. Nagel, Memory formation in matter, Reviews of Modern Physics91, 035002 (2019)

    2019

  5. [4]

    Tapias, C

    D. Tapias, C. Marteau, F. Aguirre-López, and P. Sol- lich, Bringing together two paradigms of nonequilibrium: Fragile versus robust aging in driven glassy systems, Physical Review Letters133, 197101 (2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [5]

    Kovacs, Glass transition in amorphous polymers: a phenomenological study, Adv

    A. Kovacs, Glass transition in amorphous polymers: a phenomenological study, Adv. Polym. Sci3, 394 (1963)

    work page 1963

  7. [6]

    J. B. Knight, C. G. Fandrich, C. N. Lau, H. M. Jaeger, andS.R.Nagel,Densityrelaxationinavibratedgranular material, Physical review E51, 3957 (1995)

    work page 1995

  8. [7]

    Ben-David, S

    O. Ben-David, S. M. Rubinstein, and J. Fineberg, Slip- stick and the evolution of frictional strength, Nature463, 76 (2010)

    2010

Show all 76 references
  1. [8]

    D. M. Kaz, R. McGorty, M. Mani, M. P. Brenner, and V. N. Manoharan, Physical ageing of the contact line on colloidal particles at liquid interfaces, Nature materials 11, 138 (2012)

    2012

  2. [9]

    Matan, R

    K. Matan, R. B. Williams, T. A. Witten, and S. R. Nagel, Crumpling a thin sheet, Physical Review Letters 88, 076101 (2002). 10

    2002

  3. [10]

    Lahini, O

    Y. Lahini, O. Gottesman, A. Amir, and S. M. Rubinstein, Nonmonotonic aging and memory retention in disordered mechanical systems, Physical review letters118, 085501 (2017)

    2017

  4. [11]

    Bouchaud, Weak ergodicity breaking and aging in disordered systems, Journal de Physique I2, 1705 (1992)

    J.-P. Bouchaud, Weak ergodicity breaking and aging in disordered systems, Journal de Physique I2, 1705 (1992)

    1992

  5. [12]

    D. M. Robe, S. Boettcher, P. Sibani, and P. Yunker, Record dynamics: Direct experimental evidence from jammed colloids, Europhysics Letters116, 38003 (2016)

    2016

  6. [13]

    Shohat, Y

    D. Shohat, Y. Friedman, and Y. Lahini, Logarithmic ag- ing via instability cascades in disordered systems, Nature Physics19, 1890 (2023)

    2023

  7. [14]

    D. J. Korchinski, D. Shohat, Y. Lahini, and M. Wyart, Microscopic description of the intermittent dy- namics driving logarithmic creep, arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.17415 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Corte, P

    L. Corte, P. M. Chaikin, J. P. Gollub, and D. J. Pine, Random organization in periodically driven systems, Na- ture Physics4, 420 (2008)

    2008

  9. [16]

    Regev, T

    I. Regev, T. Lookman, and C. Reichhardt, Onset of irre- versibility and chaos in amorphous solids under periodic shear, Physical Review E88, 062401 (2013)

    2013

  10. [17]

    J. D. Paulsen and N. C. Keim, Mechanical memories in solids, from disorder to design, Annual Review of Con- densed Matter Physics16(2024)

    2024

  11. [18]

    J. D. Paulsen, N. C. Keim, and S. R. Nagel, Mul- tiple transient memories in experiments on sheared non-brownian suspensions, Physical review letters113, 068301 (2014)

    2014

  12. [19]

    Fiocco, G

    D. Fiocco, G. Foffi, and S. Sastry, Encoding of memory in sheared amorphous solids, Physical review letters112, 025702 (2014)

    2014

  13. [20]

    Mungan, S

    M. Mungan, S. Sastry, K. Dahmen, and I. Regev, Net- works and hierarchies: How amorphous materials learn to remember, Physical review letters123, 178002 (2019)

    2019

  14. [21]

    Shohat and Y

    D. Shohat and Y. Lahini, Dissipation indicates memory formation in driven disordered systems, Physical Review Letters130, 048202 (2023)

    2023

  15. [22]

    Bense and M

    H. Bense and M. van Hecke, Complex pathways and memory in compressed corrugated sheets, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118, e2111436118 (2021)

    2021

  16. [23]

    J. Liu, M. Teunisse, G. Korovin, I. R. Vermaire, L. Jin, H. Bense, and M. van Hecke, Controlled pathways and sequential information processing in serially coupled me- chanical hysterons, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences121, e2308414121 (2024)

    2024

  17. [24]

    L. J. Kwakernaak and M. van Hecke, Counting and se- quential information processing in mechanical metama- terials, Physical Review Letters130, 268204 (2023)

    2023

  18. [25]

    P. Das, H. Vinutha, and S. Sastry, Unified phase diagram of reversible–irreversible, jamming, and yielding transi- tions in cyclically sheared soft-sphere packings, Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences117, 10203 (2020)

    2020

  19. [26]

    Bhaumik, G

    H. Bhaumik, G. Foffi, and S. Sastry, The role of anneal- ing in determining the yielding behavior of glasses un- der cyclic shear deformation, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118, e2100227118 (2021)

    2021

  20. [27]

    Fiocco, G

    D. Fiocco, G. Foffi, and S. Sastry, Oscillatory athermal quasistaticdeformationofamodelglass,PhysicalReview E88, 020301 (2013)

    2013

  21. [28]

    Y. Zhao, Y. Zhao, D. Wang, H. Zheng, B. Chakraborty, and J. E. Socolar, Ultrastable shear-jammed granular material, Physical Review X12, 031021 (2022)

    2022

  22. [29]

    J. T. Parley, S. Sastry, and P. Sollich, Mean-field the- ory of yielding under oscillatory shear, Physical Review Letters128, 198001 (2022)

    2022

  23. [30]

    Maity, H

    S. Maity, H. Bhaumik, S. Athani, and S. Sastry, Fatigue failure in glasses under cyclic shear deformation, arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.17384 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  24. [31]

    P. Das, A. D. Parmar, and S. Sastry, Annealing glasses by cyclic shear deformation, The Journal of Chemical Physics157(2022)

    2022

  25. [32]

    N. V. Priezjev, Heterogeneous relaxation dynamics in amorphous materials under cyclic loading, Physical Re- view E87, 052302 (2013)

    2013

  26. [33]

    P. K. Jana and N. V. Priezjev, Relaxation dynamics in amorphous alloys under asymmetric cyclic shear defor- mation, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids600, 121996 (2023)

    2023

  27. [34]

    Majumdar and I

    D. Majumdar and I. Regev, Memory switching due to thermal noise in amorphous solids subject to cyclic shear, arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.09869 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Bandi, H

    M. Bandi, H. G. E. Hentschel, I. Procaccia, S. Roy, and J. Zylberg, Training, memory and universal scaling in amorphous frictional granular matter, Europhysics Let- ters122, 38003 (2018)

    2018

  29. [36]

    J. R. Macdonald, Linear relaxation: Distributions, ther- mal activation, structure, and ambiguity, Journal of ap- plied physics62, R51 (1987)

    1987

  30. [37]

    R. V. Chamberlin, Experiments and theory of the non- exponential relaxation in liquids, glasses, polymers and crystals, Phase Transitions: A Multinational Journal65, 169 (1998)

    1998

  31. [38]

    A. Amir, S. Borini, Y. Oreg, and Y. Imry, Huge (but finite) time scales in slow relaxations: Beyond simple ag- ing, Physical review letters107, 186407 (2011)

    2011

  32. [39]

    A. Amir, Y. Oreg, and Y. Imry, On relaxations and aging of various glasses, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences109, 1850 (2012)

    2012

  33. [40]

    Preisach, Über die magnetische nachwirkung, Zeitschrift für physik94, 277 (1935)

    F. Preisach, Über die magnetische nachwirkung, Zeitschrift für physik94, 277 (1935)

    1935

  34. [41]

    van Hecke, Profusion of transition pathways for inter- acting hysterons, Physical Review E104, 054608 (2021)

    M. van Hecke, Profusion of transition pathways for inter- acting hysterons, Physical Review E104, 054608 (2021)

    2021

  35. [42]

    Shohat, Y

    D. Shohat, Y. Lahini, and D. Hexner, Emergent marginality in frustrated multistable networks, The Jour- nal of Chemical Physics162(2025)

    2025

  36. [43]

    L. Yan, G. Düring, and M. Wyart, Why glass elasticity affects the thermodynamics and fragility of supercooled liquids, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, 6307 (2013)

    2013

  37. [44]

    Shohat, D

    D. Shohat, D. Hexner, and Y. Lahini, Memory from coupled instabilities in unfolded crumpled sheets, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences119, e2200028119 (2022)

    2022

  38. [45]

    Parisi, Order parameter for spin-glasses, Physical Re- view Letters50, 1946 (1983)

    G. Parisi, Order parameter for spin-glasses, Physical Re- view Letters50, 1946 (1983)

    1983

  39. [46]

    Mézard, G

    M. Mézard, G. Parisi, N. Sourlas, G. Toulouse, and M. Virasoro, Replica symmetry breaking and the na- ture of the spin glass phase, Journal de Physique45, 843 (1984)

    1984

  40. [47]

    Mézard, G

    M. Mézard, G. Parisi, and M. A. Virasoro,Spin glass the- ory and beyond: An Introduction to the Replica Method and Its Applications, Vol. 9 (World Scientific Publishing Company, 1987)

    1987

  41. [48]

    Charbonneau, J

    P. Charbonneau, J. Kurchan, G. Parisi, P. Urbani, and F. Zamponi, Fractal free energy landscapes in structural glasses, Nature communications5, 3725 (2014). 11

    2014

  42. [49]

    Scalliet, L

    C. Scalliet, L. Berthier, and F. Zamponi, Nature of exci- tations and defects in structural glasses, Nature commu- nications10, 5102 (2019)

    2019

  43. [50]

    We adopt the notation of force and displacement, yet the derivation applies to our torsional measurements as well

  44. [51]

    Lahini, S

    Y. Lahini, S. M. Rubinstein, and A. Amir, Crackling noise during slow relaxations in crumpled sheets, Physi- cal review letters130, 258201 (2023)

    2023

  45. [52]

    N. C. Keim, J. Hass, B. Kroger, and D. Wieker, Global memory from local hysteresis in an amorphous solid, Physical Review Research2, 012004 (2020)

    2020

  46. [53]

    N. C. Keim and J. D. Paulsen, Multiperiodic orbits from interacting soft spots in cyclically sheared amorphous solids, Science Advances7, eabg7685 (2021)

    2021

  47. [54]

    N. C. Keim and D. Medina, Mechanical annealing and memories in a disordered solid, Science Advances8, eabo1614 (2022)

    2022

  48. [55]

    C. W. Lindeman, T. R. Jalowiec, and N. C. Keim, Iso- lating the enhanced memory of a glassy system, arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.07177 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  49. [57]

    J.J.Hopfield,Neuralnetworksandphysicalsystemswith emergent collective computational abilities., Proceedings of the national academy of sciences79, 2554 (1982)

    1982

  50. [58]

    C. W. Lindeman and S. R. Nagel, Multiple memory formation in glassy landscapes, Science Advances7, eabg7133 (2021)

    2021

  51. [59]

    C. W. Lindeman and S. R. Nagel, Minimal cyclic behavior in sheared amorphous solids, arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.01679 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Shohat and M

    D. Shohat and M. van Hecke, Geometric control and memory in networks of hysteretic elements, Physical Re- view Letters134, 188201 (2025)

    2025

  53. [61]

    A. P. Thompson, H. M. Aktulga, R. Berger, D. S. Bolin- tineanu, W. M. Brown, P. S. Crozier, P. J. In’t Veld, A. Kohlmeyer, S. G. Moore, T. D. Nguyen,et al., Lammps-a flexible simulation tool for particle-based ma- terials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales, Com...

    2022

  54. [62]

    Procaccia and T

    I. Procaccia and T. Samanta, Energy dissipation in cyclic strain of amorphous solids, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.13035 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  55. [63]

    E. M. Kramer and A. E. Lobkovsky, Universal power law in the noise from a crumpled elastic sheet, Physical Re- view E53, 1465 (1996)

    1996

  56. [64]

    P. A. Houle and J. P. Sethna, Acoustic emission from crumpling paper, Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, andRelatedInterdisciplinaryTopics54, 278 (1996)

    1996

  57. [65]

    Widmer-Cooper, P

    A. Widmer-Cooper, P. Harrowell, and H. Fynewever, How reproducible are dynamic heterogeneities in a super- cooled liquid?, Physical review letters93, 135701 (2004)

    2004

  58. [66]

    Regev and T

    I. Regev and T. Lookman, The irreversibility transition in amorphous solids under periodic shear, Avalanches in Functional Materials and Geophysics , 227 (2017)

    2017

  59. [67]

    Reichhardt, I

    C. Reichhardt, I. Regev, K. Dahmen, S. Okuma, and C. J. O. Reichhardt, Reversible to irreversible transitions in periodic driven many-body systems and future direc- tions for classical and quantum systems, Physical Review Research5, 021001 (2023)

    2023

  60. [68]

    J. P. Sethna, K. Dahmen, S. Kartha, J. A. Krumhansl, B. W. Roberts, and J. D. Shore, Hysteresis and hier- archies: Dynamics of disorder-driven first-order phase transformations, Physical Review Letters70, 3347 (1993)

    1993

  61. [69]

    Perković and J

    O. Perković and J. P. Sethna, Improved magnetic infor- mation storage using return-point memory, Journal of applied physics81, 1590 (1997)

    1997

  62. [70]

    Coppersmith, T

    S. Coppersmith, T. Jones, L. Kadanoff, A. Levine, J. Mc- Carten, S. Nagel, S. Venkataramani, and X. Wu, Self- organized short-term memories, Physical review letters 78, 3983 (1997)

    1997

  63. [71]

    N. C. Keim and S. R. Nagel, Generic transient memory formation in disordered systems with noise, Physical re- view letters107, 010603 (2011)

    2011

  64. [72]

    C. W. Lindeman, T. R. Jalowiec, and N. C. Keim, Gen- eralizing multiple memories from a single drive: The hys- teron latch, Science Advances11, eadr5933 (2025)

    2025

  65. [73]

    Andrejevic, L

    J. Andrejevic, L. M. Lee, S. M. Rubinstein, and C. H. Rycroft, A model for the fragmentation kinetics of crumpled thin sheets, Nature communications12, 1470 (2021)

    2021

  66. [74]

    Korchinski and J

    D. Korchinski and J. Rottler, Dynamic phase diagram of plastically deformed amorphous solids at finite tempera- ture, Physical Review E106, 034103 (2022)

    2022

  67. [75]

    Virtanen, R

    P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, T. E. Oliphant, M. Haber- land, T. Reddy, D. Cournapeau, E. Burovski, P. Peter- son, W. Weckesser, J. Bright,et al., Scipy 1.0: fundamen- tal algorithms for scientific computing in python, Nature methods17, 261 (2020). Experimental methods Crumpled she...

    2020

  68. [76]

    The system’s preparation by stabilizing a random ini- tial condition is performed at zero temperature

    to integrate these equations for all hysterons simul- taneously, halting when eitherR(ti) =R i or∆U i = 0for any hysteron. The system’s preparation by stabilizing a random ini- tial condition is performed at zero temperature. In static conditions, the quench by∆Uis simulated u...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.