pith. sign in

arxiv: 2506.10902 · v2 · submitted 2025-06-12 · 🧮 math.OA

Nuclear C*-algebras: 99 problems

Christopher Schafhauser , Aaron Tikuisis , Stuart White This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 09:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.OA MSC 46L0546L35
keywords nuclear C*-algebrasclassificationopen problemsstructure theoryoperator algebrasC*-algebrasK-theory
0
0 comments X

The pith

A list of 99 open questions maps the current frontiers in the structure and classification of nuclear C*-algebras.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper assembles 99 specific questions that capture the main unresolved issues in how nuclear C*-algebras behave and how they can be told apart. These algebras arise in the mathematical study of quantum systems and admit good approximation properties that make their theory tractable. By gathering the questions in one place the authors give researchers a shared set of targets rather than scattered open ends. A reader would care because progress on any sizable fraction of the list would move the classification program forward in a measurable way. The collection therefore functions as a practical agenda for the next stage of work in operator algebras.

Core claim

The authors present a curated collection of 99 problems whose resolution would clarify the structure and classification of nuclear C*-algebras, with emphasis on invariants, rigidity phenomena, and the extent to which these algebras are determined by their K-theoretic and other algebraic data.

What carries the argument

The central object is the enumerated list of 99 open questions, each designed to isolate a concrete gap in the present understanding of nuclear C*-algebras and their classification.

If this is right

  • Solving a substantial number of the listed questions would advance the Elliott classification program for simple nuclear C*-algebras.
  • The problems supply concrete test cases for new invariants or rigidity techniques developed in the area.
  • Progress on the list would clarify which properties of nuclear C*-algebras are preserved under various constructions such as tensor products or crossed products.
  • The compilation offers a benchmark against which future papers can measure incremental advances.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The questions may serve as a template for similar problem lists in neighboring areas such as non-simple C*-algebras or von Neumann algebras.
  • Several problems could be attacked computationally for concrete examples arising from dynamical systems, providing quick feedback on proposed invariants.
  • The list implicitly connects classification questions to approximation properties that appear in quantum information theory.

Load-bearing premise

The listed questions accurately capture the most significant open issues in the current literature on nuclear C*-algebras and their classification.

What would settle it

A later survey of active researchers that ranks the field's priorities and finds that several of the 99 problems are already solved or that major gaps were omitted would show the list is incomplete.

read the original abstract

We present a collection of questions related to the structure and classification of nuclear C*-algebras.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a collection of 99 questions related to the structure and classification of nuclear C*-algebras.

Significance. A well-curated list of open problems can serve as a useful reference point for the operator algebras community, particularly in directing attention to unresolved questions in the classification program for nuclear C*-algebras following recent structural results.

major comments (1)
  1. The central claim rests on the questions being both open and representative of significant gaps; however, the manuscript provides no explicit verification or literature pointers confirming that each listed question remains unresolved at the time of writing.
minor comments (3)
  1. Add a brief introductory section outlining the scope and selection principles for the 99 questions to help readers contextualize their importance.
  2. For each problem, include at least one or two key references to partial results or related work to increase the list's utility.
  3. Consider grouping the questions thematically (e.g., by K-theory, traces, or embedding properties) rather than a flat enumeration for improved readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of the manuscript and the recommendation for minor revision. The comment is addressed point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim rests on the questions being both open and representative of significant gaps; however, the manuscript provides no explicit verification or literature pointers confirming that each listed question remains unresolved at the time of writing.

    Authors: We acknowledge the observation. The manuscript compiles 99 questions that the authors, drawing on expertise in the classification program for nuclear C*-algebras, regard as currently open following recent structural results. A full literature search and explicit citation for each of the 99 items would require a substantially longer document and lies outside the intended scope of a concise problem list. Nevertheless, to strengthen the presentation we will add a clarifying paragraph in the introduction stating that the questions are presented as open based on the state of the literature at the time of submission. Where concise references or contextual remarks already exist in the authors' notes for particular problems, these will be incorporated. This constitutes a partial revision that directly addresses the concern without altering the character of the compilation. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: curation of open questions with no derivations or reductions

full rationale

The paper consists solely of a list of 99 open questions on the structure and classification of nuclear C*-algebras. It contains no equations, no predictions, no fitted parameters, no derivations, and no load-bearing self-citations that reduce claims to prior inputs. The central activity is presentation and curation of questions rather than any deductive chain, so no step reduces by construction to the paper's own inputs. This is a self-contained collection of problems with no internal mathematical argument to analyze for circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced because the work is a problem list rather than a derivation or model.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5520 in / 872 out tokens · 20681 ms · 2026-05-19T09:46:37.240290+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Uniqueness for embeddings of nuclear $C^*$-algebras into type II$_{1}$ factors

    math.OA 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Uniqueness up to unitary conjugacy holds for nuclear maps from separable exact C*-algebras satisfying the UCT into ultraproducts of finite factors when the maps agree on traces and total K-theory.

  2. Stable rank one, tracial local homogeneity and uniform property $\Gamma$

    math.OA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    C*-algebras with stable rank one and tracial local homogeneity satisfy uniform property Γ, which implies they satisfy the Toms-Winter conjecture.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 300 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Alboiu and J

    M. Alboiu and J. Lutley. The stable rank of diagonal ASH algebras and crossed products by minimal homeomorphisms. M¨ unster J. Math., 15(1):167–220, 2022

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Amrutam,D

    T. Amrutam, D. Gao, S. Kunnawalkam Elayavalli, and G. Patchell. Strict comparison in reduced group C∗-algebras. arXiv:2412.06031

    work page arXiv

  3. [3]

    an Huef and D

    A. an Huef and D. P. Williams. Nuclear dimension of groupoidC∗-algebras with large abelian isotropy, with applications to C∗-algebras of directed graphs and twists. arXiv:2412.10241

    work page arXiv

  4. [4]

    Anantharaman-Delaroche

    C. Anantharaman-Delaroche. Action moyennable d’un groupe localement compact sur une alg` ebre de von Neumann.Math. Scand., 45(2):289–304, 1979

    work page 1979

  5. [5]

    Anantharaman-Delaroche

    C. Anantharaman-Delaroche. Syst` emes dynamiques non commutatifs et moyennabilit´ e. Math. Ann., 279(2):297–315, 1987

    work page 1987

  6. [6]

    Anantharaman-Delaroche and J

    C. Anantharaman-Delaroche and J. Renault. Amenable groupoids, volume 36 of Monogra- phies de L’Enseignement Math´ ematique [Monographs of L’Enseignement Math´ ematique]. L’Enseignement Math´ ematique, Geneva, 2000. With a foreword by G. Skandalis and Ap- pendix B by E. Germain

    work page 2000

  7. [7]

    Ando and E

    H. Ando and E. Kirchberg. Non-commutativity of the central sequence algebra for separable non-type I C∗-algebras. J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) , 94(1):280–294, 2016

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Antoine, F

    R. Antoine, F. Perera, L. Robert, and H. Thiel. C∗-algebras of stable rank one and their Cuntz semigroups. Duke Math. J. , 171(1):33–99, 2022

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    Antoine, F

    R. Antoine, F. Perera, L. Robert, and H. Thiel. Traces on ultrapowers of C∗-algebras. J. Funct. Anal., 286(8):Paper No. 110341, 65, 2024

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    Antoine, F

    R. Antoine, F. Perera, and H. Thiel. Tensor products and regularity properties of Cuntz semigroups. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. , 251(1199):viii+191, 2018

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    Antoine,F

    R. Antoine, F. Perera, H. Thiel, and E. Vilalta. Pure C∗-algebras. arXiv:2406.11052

    work page arXiv

  12. [12]

    P. Ara, K. R. Goodearl, K. C. O’Meara, and E. Pardo. Separative cancellation for projective modules over exchange rings. Israel J. Math. , 105:105–137, 1998

    work page 1998

  13. [13]

    P. Ara, K. R. Goodearl, K. C. O’Meara, and R. Raphael. K1 of separative exchange rings and C∗-algebras with real rank zero. Pacific J. Math. , 195(2):261–275, 2000

    work page 2000

  14. [14]

    P. Ara, F. Perera, and A. S. Toms. K-theory for operator algebras. Classification of C∗- algebras. In Aspects of operator algebras and applications , volume 534 of Contemp. Math., pages 1–71. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2011

    work page 2011

  15. [15]

    R. J. Archbold and J. Spielberg. Topologically free actions and ideals in discrete C∗- dynamical systems. Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc. (2) , 37(1):119–124, 1994

    work page 1994

  16. [16]

    Atkinson, I

    S. Atkinson, I. Goldbring, and S. Kunnawalkam Elayavalli. Factorial relative commutants and the generalized Jung property for II 1 factors. Adv. Math., 396:Paper No. 108107, 53, 2022

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Austin and A

    K. Austin and A. Mitra. Groupoid models of C∗-algebras and the Gelfand functor. New York J. Math., 27:740–775, 2021

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Barlak and X

    S. Barlak and X. Li. Cartan subalgebras and the UCT problem. Adv. Math., 316:748–769, 2017

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    Barlak and G

    S. Barlak and G. Szab´ o. Rokhlin actions of finite groups on UHF-absorbing C∗-algebras. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 369(2):833–859, 2017

    work page 2017

  20. [20]

    F. P. Baudier, B. M. Braga, I. Farah, A. Khukhro, A. Vignati, and R. Willett. Uniform Roe algebras of uniformly locally finite metric spaces are rigid. Invent. Math., 230(3):1071–1100, 2022

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    E. B´ edos. On actions of amenable groups on II 1-factors. J. Funct. Anal. , 91(2):404–414, 1990

    work page 1990

  22. [22]

    Bentmann and R

    R. Bentmann and R. Meyer. A more general method to classify up to equivariant KK- equivalence. Doc. Math., 22:423–454, 2017

    work page 2017

  23. [23]

    D. H. Bisch. On the existence of central sequences in subfactors. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 321(1):117–128, 1990

    work page 1990

  24. [24]

    Blackadar

    B. Blackadar. Shape theory for C∗-algebras. Math. Scand., 56(2):249–275, 1985. NUCLEAR C∗-ALGEBRAS: 99 PROBLEMS 83

    work page 1985

  25. [25]

    Blackadar

    B. Blackadar. Comparison theory for simple C∗-algebras. In Operator algebras and applica- tions, Vol. 1 , volume 135 of London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., pages 21–54. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1988

    work page 1988

  26. [26]

    Blackadar

    B. Blackadar. Symmetries of the CAR algebra. Ann. of Math. (2) , 131(3):589–623, 1990

    work page 1990

  27. [27]

    Blackadar

    B. Blackadar. K-theory for operator algebras, volume 5 of Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Publications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, second edition, 1998

    work page 1998

  28. [28]

    Blackadar

    B. Blackadar. Semiprojectivity in simple C∗-algebras. In Operator algebras and applications, volume 38 of Adv. Stud. Pure Math. , pages 1–17. Math. Soc. Japan, Tokyo, 2004

    work page 2004

  29. [29]

    Blackadar

    B. Blackadar. Operator algebras, volume 122 of Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences . Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2006. Theory of C∗-algebras and von Neumann algebras, Operator Algebras and Non-commutative Geometry, III

    work page 2006

  30. [30]

    Blackadar and J

    B. Blackadar and J. Cuntz. The structure of stable algebraically simple C∗-algebras. Amer. J. Math., 104(4):813–822, 1982

    work page 1982

  31. [31]

    Blackadar and D

    B. Blackadar and D. E. Handelman. Dimension functions and traces on C∗-algebras. J. Functional Analysis, 45(3):297–340, 1982

    work page 1982

  32. [32]

    Blackadar and E

    B. Blackadar and E. Kirchberg. Generalized inductive limits of finite-dimensional C∗- algebras. Math. Ann., 307(3):343–380, 1997

    work page 1997

  33. [33]

    Blackadar and E

    B. Blackadar and E. Kirchberg. Inner quasidiagonality and strong NF algebras. Pacific J. Math., 198(2):307–329, 2001

    work page 2001

  34. [34]

    Blanchard and E

    E. Blanchard and E. Kirchberg. Global Glimm halving for C∗-bundles. J. Operator Theory, 52(2):385–420, 2004

    work page 2004

  35. [35]

    Blanchard and E

    E. Blanchard and E. Kirchberg. Non-simple purely infinite C∗-algebras: the Hausdorff case. J. Funct. Anal., 207(2):461–513, 2004

    work page 2004

  36. [36]

    Blanchard, R

    E. Blanchard, R. Rohde, and M. Rørdam. Properly infinite C(X)-algebras and K1- injectivity. J. Noncommut. Geom., 2(3):263–282, 2008

    work page 2008

  37. [37]

    B¨ onicke, S

    C. B¨ onicke, S. Chakraborty, Z. He, and H.-C. Liao. Isomorphism and Morita equivalence classes for crossed products of irrational rotation algebras by cyclic subgroups of SL2(Z). J. Funct. Anal., 275(11):3208–3243, 2018

    work page 2018

  38. [38]

    J. Bosa, N. P. Brown, Y. Sato, A. Tikuisis, S. White, and W. Winter. Covering dimension of C∗-algebras and 2-coloured classification. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. , 257(1233):vii+97, 2019

    work page 2019

  39. [39]

    J. Bosa, J. Gabe, A. Sims, and S. White. The nuclear dimension of O∞-stable C∗-algebras. Adv. Math., 401:Paper No. 108250, 51, 2022

    work page 2022

  40. [40]

    B. Bouwen. An efficient approach to Kirchberg–Phillips absorption. Master’s thesis, KU Leuven, 2020

    work page 2020

  41. [41]

    Boyle and D

    M. Boyle and D. E. Handelman. Orbit equivalence, flow equivalence and ordered cohomology. Israel J. Math. , 95:169–210, 1996

    work page 1996

  42. [42]

    Brake and W

    L. Brake and W. Winter. The Toeplitz algebra has nuclear dimension one. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc., 51(3):554–562, 2019

    work page 2019

  43. [43]

    Bratteli

    O. Bratteli. Inductive limits of finite dimensional C∗-algebras. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 171:195–234, 1972

    work page 1972

  44. [44]

    Bratteli and A

    O. Bratteli and A. Kishimoto. Trace scaling automorphisms of certain stable AF algebras. II. Q. J. Math. , 51(2):131–154, 2000

    work page 2000

  45. [45]

    Breuillard, M

    E. Breuillard, M. Kalantar, M. Kennedy, and N. Ozawa. C∗-simplicity and the unique trace property for discrete groups. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes ´Etudes Sci., 126:35–71, 2017

    work page 2017

  46. [46]

    L. G. Brown. Extensions of AF algebras: the projection lifting problem. In Operator algebras and applications, Part 1 (Kingston, Ont., 1980) , volume 38 of Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. , pages 175–176. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1982

    work page 1980

  47. [47]

    L. G. Brown and G. K. Pedersen. C∗-algebras of real rank zero. J. Funct. Anal., 99(1):131– 149, 1991

    work page 1991

  48. [48]

    L. G. Brown and G. K. Pedersen. On the geometry of the unit ball of a C∗-algebra. J. Reine Angew. Math., 469:113–147, 1995

    work page 1995

  49. [49]

    L. G. Brown and G. K. Pedersen. Non-stable K-theory and extremally rich C∗-algebras. J. Funct. Anal., 267(1):262–298, 2014

    work page 2014

  50. [50]

    N. P. Brown. AF embeddability of crossed products of AF algebras by the integers. J. Funct. Anal., 160(1):150–175, 1998

    work page 1998

  51. [51]

    N. P. Brown. Crossed products of UHF algebras by some amenable groups. Hokkaido Math. J., 29(1):201–211, 2000. 84 C. SCHAFHAUSER, A. TIKUISIS, AND S. WHITE

    work page 2000

  52. [52]

    N. P. Brown. Invariant means and finite representation theory of C∗-algebras. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., 184(865):viii+105, 2006

    work page 2006

  53. [53]

    N. P. Brown, J. R. Carri´ on, and S. White. Decomposable approximations revisited. In Operator algebras and applications—the Abel Symposium 2015 , volume 12 of Abel Symp., pages 45–65. Springer, [Cham], 2017

    work page 2015

  54. [54]

    N. P. Brown and N. Ozawa. C∗-algebras and finite-dimensional approximations, volume 88 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2008

    work page 2008

  55. [55]

    N. P. Brown, F. Perera, and A. S. Toms. The Cuntz semigroup, the Elliott conjecture, and dimension functions on C∗-algebras. J. Reine Angew. Math. , 621:191–211, 2008

    work page 2008

  56. [56]

    N. P. Brown and A. S. Toms. Three applications of the Cuntz semigroup. Int. Math. Res. Not., IMRN, page Article ID rnm068, 2007

    work page 2007

  57. [57]

    A. Buss, S. Echterhoff, and R. Willett. Injectivity, crossed products, and amenable group actions. In K-theory in algebra, analysis and topology, volume 749 of Contemp. Math., pages 105–137. Amer. Math. Soc., [Providence], RI, 2020

    work page 2020

  58. [58]

    Cameron, E

    J. Cameron, E. Christensen, A. M. Sinclair, R. R. Smith, S. White, and A. D. Wiggins. Kadison–Kastler stable factors. Duke Math. J. , 163(14):2639–2686, 2014

    work page 2014

  59. [59]

    T. M. Carlsen, A. Dor-On, and S. Eilers. Shift equivalences through the lens of Cuntz-Krieger algebras. Anal. PDE, 17(1):345–377, 2024

    work page 2024

  60. [60]

    J. R. Carri´ on, M. Dadarlat, and C. Eckhardt. On groups with quasidiagonal C∗-algebras. J. Funct. Anal., 265(1):135–152, 2013

    work page 2013

  61. [61]

    J. R. Carri´ on, J. Gabe, C. Schafhauser, A. Tikuisis, and S. White. Classifying ∗- homomorphisms I: Unital simple nuclear C∗-algebras. arXiv:2307.06480

    work page arXiv

  62. [62]

    J. R. Carri´ on, J. Gabe, C. Schafhauser, A. Tikuisis, and S. White. Classifying ∗- homomorphisms II. In preparation

    work page

  63. [63]

    J. R. Carri´ on and C. Schafhauser. A topology on E-theory. J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) , 109(6):Paper No. e12917, 32, 2024

    work page 2024

  64. [64]

    Castillejos, J

    J. Castillejos, J. R. Carri´ on, S. Evington, J. Gabe, C. Schafhauser, A. Tikuisis, and S. White. Tracially complete C∗-algebras. arXiv:2310.20594

    work page arXiv

  65. [65]

    Castillejos and S

    J. Castillejos and S. Evington. Nuclear dimension of simple stably projectionless C∗- algebras. Anal. PDE, 13(7):2205–2240, 2020

    work page 2020

  66. [66]

    Castillejos, S

    J. Castillejos, S. Evington, A. Tikuisis, and S. White. Uniform property Γ. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN, (13):9864–9908, 2022

    work page 2022

  67. [67]

    Castillejos, S

    J. Castillejos, S. Evington, A. Tikuisis, S. White, and W. Winter. Nuclear dimension of simple C∗-algebras. Invent. Math., 224(1):245–290, 2021

    work page 2021

  68. [68]

    Chakraborty, S

    S. Chakraborty, S. Echterhoff, J. Kranz, and S. Nishikawa. K-theory of noncommutative Bernoulli shifts. Math. Ann., 388(3):2671–2703, 2024

    work page 2024

  69. [69]

    Champetier and V

    C. Champetier and V. Guirardel. Limit groups as limits of free groups. Israel J. Math. , 146:1–75, 2005

    work page 2005

  70. [70]

    M. D. Choi and E. G. Effros. The completely positive lifting problem for C∗-algebras. Ann. of Math. (2) , 104(3):585–609, 1976

    work page 1976

  71. [71]

    Christensen

    E. Christensen. Near inclusions of C∗-algebras. Acta Math., 144(3-4):249–265, 1980

    work page 1980

  72. [72]

    Christensen, A

    E. Christensen, A. M. Sinclair, R. R. Smith, and S. White. Perturbations of C∗-algebraic invariants. Geom. Funct. Anal., 20(2):368–397, 2010

    work page 2010

  73. [73]

    Christensen, A

    E. Christensen, A. M. Sinclair, R. R. Smith, S. A. White, and W. Winter. Perturbations of nuclear C∗-algebras. Acta Math., 208(1):93–150, 2012

    work page 2012

  74. [74]

    M. S. Christensen. Regularity of Villadsen algebras and characters on their central sequence algebras. Math. Scand., 123(1):121–141, 2018

    work page 2018

  75. [75]

    L. O. Clark, J. Fletcher, and A. an Huef. All classifiable Kirchberg algebras are C∗-algebras of ample groupoids. Expo. Math., 38(4):559–565, 2020

    work page 2020

  76. [76]

    C. T. Conley, S. C. Jackson, D. Kerr, A. S. Marks, B. Seward, and R. D. Tucker-Drob. Følner tilings for actions of amenable groups. Math. Ann., 371(1-2):663–683, 2018

    work page 2018

  77. [77]

    A. Connes. Outer conjugacy classes of automorphisms of factors. Ann. Sci. ´Ecole Norm. Sup. (4), 8(3):383–419, 1975

    work page 1975

  78. [78]

    A. Connes. Classification of injective factors. Cases II 1, II∞, III λ, λ ̸= 1. Ann. of Math. (2) , 104(1):73–115, 1976

    work page 1976

  79. [79]

    A. Connes. Periodic automorphisms of the hyperfinite factor of type II 1. Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged), 39(1-2):39–66, 1977. NUCLEAR C∗-ALGEBRAS: 99 PROBLEMS 85

    work page 1977

  80. [80]

    Connes, J

    A. Connes, J. Feldman, and B. Weiss. An amenable equivalence relation is generated by a single transformation. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems , 1(4):431–450, 1981

    work page 1981

Showing first 80 references.