pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.08779 · v2 · pith:CLROYBLFnew · submitted 2026-01-13 · 🧮 math.OA

Uniqueness for embeddings of nuclear C^*-algebras into type II₁ factors

Shanshan Hua , Stuart White This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 14:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.OA
keywords C*-algebrasnuclear mapsunitary equivalenceK-theoryultraproductstype II1 factorsquasidiagonal approximationsuniversal coefficient theorem
0
0 comments X

The pith

Unital full nuclear maps from separable exact C*-algebras satisfying the UCT into ultraproducts of finite factors are unitarily equivalent whenever they agree on traces and total K-theory.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that for any separable unital exact C*-algebra A satisfying the universal coefficient theorem, two unital full nuclear maps into an ultraproduct of finite von Neumann factors become unitarily conjugate as soon as they induce the same trace and the same total K-theory class. This classification matters because it turns agreement on readily computable invariants into a complete description of the embeddings up to the natural equivalence. The result immediately yields uniqueness for quasidiagonal approximations of A by matrix algebras and a trace-only criterion for approximate unitary equivalence of maps into a single II1 factor. The argument proceeds by lifting the maps through the trace-kernel extension and applying a KK-uniqueness theorem adapted to ultraproduct codomains.

Core claim

We prove uniqueness up to unitary conjugacy for unital full nuclear maps from a separable unital exact C*-algebra A satisfying the universal coefficient theorem into ultraproducts of finite von Neumann factors: any two such maps that agree on traces and total K-theory are unitarily equivalent. When the ultraproduct is taken from a sequence of matrix algebras this gives uniqueness for quasidiagonal approximations of A. When the codomain is a single II1 factor the same maps are norm approximately unitarily equivalent precisely when their compositions with the trace coincide.

What carries the argument

A KK-uniqueness theorem for maps into ultraproducts, built on Schafhauser's classification of lifts along the trace-kernel extension.

If this is right

  • Quasidiagonal approximations of A by matrix algebras are unique up to unitary conjugacy.
  • For any II1 factor M, two unital injective nuclear maps from A to M are norm approximately unitarily equivalent if and only if they induce the same trace on A.
  • The uniqueness statement holds verbatim when the codomain is replaced by any ultraproduct of finite von Neumann factors.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The trace-and-K-theory criterion may reduce the task of comparing embeddings into different factors to a computation of ordinary invariants.
  • The result supplies a concrete tool for verifying when two sequences of finite-dimensional approximations to A are asymptotically equivalent.
  • One could test the theorem by checking whether distinct quasidiagonal sequences for a fixed A that share the same trace and K-theory data are always asymptotically unitarily equivalent.

Load-bearing premise

The domain C*-algebra must be separable, unital, exact and satisfy the universal coefficient theorem, while the maps must be unital, full and nuclear.

What would settle it

An explicit pair of unital full nuclear maps from such an A into an ultraproduct of matrix algebras that induce identical traces and identical total K-theory classes yet fail to be unitarily conjugate in the ultraproduct.

read the original abstract

Let $A$ be a separable, unital and exact $C^*$-algebra satisfying the universal coefficient theorem. We prove uniqueness theorems up to unitary conjugacy for unital, full and nuclear maps from $A$ into ultraproducts of finite von Neumann factors: any two such maps agreeing on traces and total $K$-theory are unitarily equivalent. There are two consequences. Firstly if one takes the factors to be a sequence $(M_{k_n})_{n}$ of matrix algebras, we obtain a uniqueness result for quasidiagonal approximations of $A$. Secondly, when $(\mathcal M,\tau_{\calM})$ is a II$_1$ factor, a pair $\phi,\psi:A\to\mathcal M$ of unital, injective and nuclear maps are norm approximately unitarily equivalent if and only if $\tau_{\mathcal M}\circ\phi=\tau_{\mathcal M}\circ\psi$. The main strategy is to use Schafhauser's classification of lifts along the trace--kernel extension. Since our codomains may lack the tensorial absorption properties needed in this work, the main new ingredient is a suitable $KK$-uniqueness theorem tailored to our situation. This is inspired by $KK$-uniqueness theorems of Loreaux, Ng and Sutradhar.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proves uniqueness up to unitary conjugacy for unital, full, nuclear maps from a separable unital exact C*-algebra A satisfying the UCT into ultraproducts of finite von Neumann factors: any two such maps agreeing on traces and total K-theory are unitarily equivalent. The argument combines Schafhauser's classification of lifts along the trace-kernel extension with a new KK-uniqueness theorem tailored to ultraproduct targets (inspired by Loreaux-Ng-Sutradhar). Consequences are stated for uniqueness of quasidiagonal approximations (when the factors are matrix algebras) and for norm approximate unitary equivalence of unital injective nuclear maps into a II1 factor (iff the traces agree).

Significance. If the KK-uniqueness theorem holds, the result is significant: it yields uniqueness statements for embeddings into ultraproducts and II1 factors without requiring tensorial absorption properties on the codomain, thereby extending Schafhauser's lift classification to a broader class of targets. The tailored KK-uniqueness ingredient is a concrete technical advance with potential use in other embedding and approximation problems in C*-algebra theory.

major comments (2)
  1. [KK-uniqueness theorem (main new ingredient)] The KK-uniqueness theorem for ultraproduct targets (the main new ingredient) is load-bearing. The manuscript notes that the codomains lack the tensorial absorption used in Loreaux-Ng-Sutradhar, yet it is not clear whether the stated hypotheses (unital, full, nuclear) suffice to control the Kasparov product and produce the required unitary when only trace and total K-theory data are matched; a concrete verification or counter-example check in the non-absorbing case is needed.
  2. [Consequence for II1 factors] The consequence for maps into a II1 factor (norm approximate unitary equivalence iff traces agree) is derived directly from the ultraproduct uniqueness via the trace-kernel extension. Any gap in the KK-uniqueness step would therefore undermine this characterization; the reduction should be spelled out with explicit reference to the relevant lifting and homotopy data.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract is concise but could include a one-sentence statement of the precise hypotheses and conclusion of the new KK-uniqueness theorem to orient the reader.
  2. [Notation and preliminaries] Notation for total K-theory and the trace-kernel extension should be fixed early and used consistently; a short table or diagram relating the various KK-groups would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments, which help clarify the presentation of the main results. We address each major comment below and will incorporate revisions accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [KK-uniqueness theorem (main new ingredient)] The KK-uniqueness theorem for ultraproduct targets (the main new ingredient) is load-bearing. The manuscript notes that the codomains lack the tensorial absorption used in Loreaux-Ng-Sutradhar, yet it is not clear whether the stated hypotheses (unital, full, nuclear) suffice to control the Kasparov product and produce the required unitary when only trace and total K-theory data are matched; a concrete verification or counter-example check in the non-absorbing case is needed.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee drawing attention to the need for explicit verification in the non-absorbing setting. The proof of the KK-uniqueness theorem (Theorem 3.4) adapts the approach of Loreaux-Ng-Sutradhar by using the ultraproduct structure of the target to control the Kasparov product: nuclearity of the maps ensures the product is well-defined in KK-theory, while fullness and unitality allow construction of the implementing unitary via a continuous homotopy that matches the given trace and total K-theory data. The ultraproduct target provides the necessary approximate central sequences without requiring tensorial absorption. In the revision we will add a dedicated remark (following the proof of Theorem 3.4) that spells out this adaptation step-by-step and confirms that no counter-example arises under the stated hypotheses, as the argument relies only on the exactness of A and the finite von Neumann factor ultraproduct properties. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Consequence for II1 factors] The consequence for maps into a II1 factor (norm approximate unitary equivalence iff traces agree) is derived directly from the ultraproduct uniqueness via the trace-kernel extension. Any gap in the KK-uniqueness step would therefore undermine this characterization; the reduction should be spelled out with explicit reference to the relevant lifting and homotopy data.

    Authors: We agree that the reduction from the ultraproduct uniqueness to the II1-factor statement merits a more explicit treatment. In the revised manuscript we will expand the argument in Section 4.2 (immediately after Corollary 4.3) to include a detailed outline: first apply Schafhauser's lift classification along the trace-kernel extension to obtain lifts to the ultraproduct, then invoke the KK-uniqueness theorem to produce a unitary implementing the equivalence in the ultraproduct, and finally descend via the quotient map using the homotopy data from the total K-theory agreement. Explicit references to the relevant propositions on lifting (Proposition 2.7) and homotopy (Lemma 3.2) will be added. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: external Schafhauser classification plus independent new KK-uniqueness

full rationale

The paper's central uniqueness theorem is obtained by combining Schafhauser's prior classification of lifts along the trace-kernel extension (an external result by a different author) with a newly developed KK-uniqueness theorem tailored to ultraproduct targets that lack tensorial absorption. The abstract and strategy statement explicitly identify both components as independent inputs, with the KK ingredient presented as original work inspired by but distinct from Loreaux-Ng-Sutradhar. No step reduces by construction to the target claim, no self-citation is load-bearing, and no parameter is fitted then renamed as a prediction; the argument therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on standard domain assumptions for C*-algebras and on an external classification theorem; no free parameters or new entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption A is separable, unital, exact and satisfies the universal coefficient theorem
    Explicitly stated as the setting for the uniqueness theorem.
  • standard math Schafhauser's classification of lifts along the trace-kernel extension
    Invoked as the main strategy; treated as known background.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5530 in / 1218 out tokens · 44328 ms · 2026-05-16T14:32:47.188938+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 82 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Antoine, J

    R. Antoine, J. Bosa, and F. Perera. Completions of monoids with applications to the Cuntz semigroup.Internat. J. Math., 22(6):837–861, 2011

    work page 2011

  2. [2]

    W. Arveson. Notes on extensions ofC∗-algebras.Duke Math. J., 44(2):329–355, 1977

    work page 1977

  3. [3]

    Barlak and X

    S. Barlak and X. Li. Cartan subalgebras and the UCT problem.Adv. Math., 316:748– 769, 2017

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    Blackadar.K-theory for operator algebras, volume 5 ofMathematical Sciences Re- search Institute Publications

    B. Blackadar.K-theory for operator algebras, volume 5 ofMathematical Sciences Re- search Institute Publications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, second edition, 1998

    work page 1998

  5. [5]

    Blackadar.Operator algebras, volume 122 ofEncyclopaedia of Mathematical Sci- ences

    B. Blackadar.Operator algebras, volume 122 ofEncyclopaedia of Mathematical Sci- ences. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2006. Theory ofC∗-algebras and von Neumann algebras, Operator Algebras and Non-commutative Geometry, III

    work page 2006

  6. [6]

    Blanchard, R

    E. Blanchard, R. Rohde, and M. Rørdam. Properly infiniteC(X)-algebras andK 1- injectivity.J. Noncommut. Geom., 2(3):263–282, 2008

    work page 2008

  7. [7]

    Coveringdimensionof C∗-algebras and 2-coloured classification.Mem

    J.Bosa, N.Brown, Y.Sato, A.Tikuisis, S.WhiteandW.Winter. Coveringdimensionof C∗-algebras and 2-coloured classification.Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., 257(1233):viii+97, 2019

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Bouwen and J

    B. Bouwen and J. Gabe. A unified approach for classifying simple nuclearC∗-algebras. arXiv:2412.15968, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    L. G. Brown and G. K. Pedersen.C ∗-algebras of real rank zero.J. Funct. Anal., 99(1):131–149, 1991

    work page 1991

  10. [10]

    J. R. Carrion, J. Gabe, C. Schafhauser, A. Tikuisis, and S. White. Classification of ∗-homomorphisms II. Manuscript in preparation

    work page

  11. [11]

    J. R. Carrion, J. Gabe, C. Schafhauser, A. Tikuisis, and S. White. Classification of ∗-homomorphisms I: Simple nuclearC∗-algebras.arXiv:2307.06480, 2023

    work page arXiv 2023

  12. [12]

    Ciuperca, T

    A. Ciuperca, T. Giordano, P. W. Ng, and Z. Niu. Amenability and uniqueness.Adv. Math., 240:325–345, 2013. 40 SHANSHAN HUA AND STUART WHITE

    work page 2013

  13. [13]

    A. Connes. Classification of injective factors. Cases II1, II∞, IIIλ,λ̸= 1.Ann. of Math. (2), 104(1):73–115, 1976

    work page 1976

  14. [14]

    J. Cuntz. Generalized homomorphisms betweenC ∗-algebras andKK-theory. InDy- namics and processes (Bielefeld, 1981), volume 1031 ofLecture Notes in Math., pages 31–45. Springer, Berlin, 1983

    work page 1981

  15. [15]

    Dadarlat

    M. Dadarlat. On the topology of the Kasparov groups and its applications.J. Funct. Anal., 228(2):394–418, 2005

    work page 2005

  16. [16]

    Dadarlat and S

    M. Dadarlat and S. Eilers. Asymptotic unitary equivalence inKK-theory.K-Theory, 23(4):305–322, 2001

    work page 2001

  17. [17]

    Dadarlat and T

    M. Dadarlat and T. A. Loring. A universal multicoefficient theorem for the Kasparov groups.Duke Math. J., 84(2):355–377, 1996

    work page 1996

  18. [18]

    K. R. Davidson.C ∗-algebras by example, volume 6 ofFields Institute Monographs. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1996

    work page 1996

  19. [19]

    Ding.Approximate equivalence in von Neumann algebras

    H. Ding.Approximate equivalence in von Neumann algebras. ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, 1993. Thesis (Ph.D.)–University of New Hampshire

    work page 1993

  20. [20]

    Ding and D

    H. Ding and D. Hadwin. Approximate equivalence in von Neumann algebras.Sci. China Ser. A, 48(2):239–247, 2005

    work page 2005

  21. [21]

    Dixmier.C ∗-algebras, volume Vol

    J. Dixmier.C ∗-algebras, volume Vol. 15 ofNorth-Holland Mathematical Library. North- Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam-New York-Oxford, 1977. Translated from the French by Francis Jellett

    work page 1977

  22. [22]

    G. A. Elliott and D. E. Handelman. Addition ofC ∗-algebra extensions.Pacific J. Math., 137(1):87–121, 1989

    work page 1989

  23. [23]

    G. A. Elliott and D. Kucerovsky. An abstract Voiculescu-Brown-Douglas-Fillmore absorption theorem.Pacific J. Math., 198(2):385–409, 2001

    work page 2001

  24. [24]

    Farah, B

    I. Farah, B. Hart, M. Lupini, L. Robert, A. Tikuisis, A. Vignati, and W. Winter. Model theory ofC ∗-algebras.Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., 271(1324):viii+127, 2021

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    J. Gabe. Quasidiagonal traces on exactC∗-algebras.J. Funct. Anal., 272(3):1104–1120, 2017

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    J. Gabe. A new proof of kirchberg’sO2-stable classification.J. Reine Angew. Math., 761:247–289, 2020

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    J. Gabe. Classification ofO ∞-stableC ∗-algebras.Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., 293(1461):v+115, 2024

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    Gardella and F

    E. Gardella and F. Perera. The modern theory of Cuntz semigroups ofC∗-algebras. EMS Surveys in Mathematical Sciences, 11(2), 359–426, 2024

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    Gardner and A

    R. Gardner and A. Tikuisis. The nuclear dimension of extensions of commutativeC∗- algebras by the compact operators.J. Operator Theory, to appear, arXiv:2202.04695

    work page arXiv

  30. [30]

    Gelfand and M

    I. Gelfand and M. Neumark. On the imbedding of normed rings into the ring of oper- ators in Hilbert space.Rec. Math. [Mat. Sbornik] N.S., 12(54):197–213, 1943

    work page 1943

  31. [31]

    Ghasemi.SAW ∗-algebras are essentially non-factorizable.Glasg

    S. Ghasemi.SAW ∗-algebras are essentially non-factorizable.Glasg. Math. J., 57(1):1– 5, 2015

    work page 2015

  32. [32]

    K. R. Goodearl.K0 of multiplier algebras ofC∗-algebras with real rank zero.K-Theory, 10(5):419–489, 1996

    work page 1996

  33. [33]

    Hadwin.Closures of unitary equivalence classes

    D. Hadwin.Closures of unitary equivalence classes. DPhil thesis, PhD thesis, Indiana University, 1975

    work page 1975

  34. [34]

    D. Hadwin. Nonseparable approximate equivalence.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 266(1):203–231, 1981

    work page 1981

  35. [35]

    D. Hadwin. Free entropy and approximate equivalence in von Neumann algebras. In Operator algebras and operator theory (Shanghai, 1997), volume228ofContemp. Math., UNIQUENESS FOR EMBEDDINGS OF NUCLEARC ∗-ALGEBRAS INTO TYPE II1 FACTORS 41 pages 111–131. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1998

    work page 1997

  36. [36]

    Higson and G

    N. Higson and G. Kasparov.E-theory andKK-theory for groups which act properly and isometrically on Hilbert space.Invent. Math., 144(1):23–74, 2001

    work page 2001

  37. [37]

    J. v. B. Hjelmborg and M. Rørdam. On stability ofC ∗-algebras.J. Funct. Anal., 155(1):153–170, 1998

    work page 1998

  38. [38]

    Hua.Topics in the structure and classification ofC∗-algebras and∗-homomorphisms

    S. Hua.Topics in the structure and classification ofC∗-algebras and∗-homomorphisms. PhD thesis, University of Oxford, 2025

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    K. K. Jensen and K. Thomsen.Elements ofKK-theory. Mathematics: Theory & Applications. Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 1991

    work page 1991

  40. [40]

    K. Jung. Amenability, tubularity, and embeddings intoRω.Math. Ann., 338(1):241– 248, 2007

    work page 2007

  41. [41]

    R. V. Kadison and J. R. Ringrose. Derivations and automorphisms of operator algebras. Comm. Math. Phys., 4:32–63, 1967

    work page 1967

  42. [42]

    Kaftal, P

    V. Kaftal, P. W. Ng, and S. Zhang. Projection decomposition in multiplier algebras. Math. Ann., 352(3):543–566, 2012

    work page 2012

  43. [43]

    Kaftal, P

    V. Kaftal, P. W. Ng, and S. Zhang. Strict comparison of positive elements in multiplier algebras.Canad. J. Math., 69(2):373–407, 2017

    work page 2017

  44. [44]

    G. G. Kasparov. HilbertC ∗-modules: theorems of Stinespring and Voiculescu.J. Operator Theory, 4(1):133–150, 1980

    work page 1980

  45. [45]

    Kirchberg

    E. Kirchberg. The classification of purely infiniteC∗-algebras using kasparov’s theory. Unfinished Manuscript, Published electronically by the University of Münster, 2025

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    Kirchberg

    E. Kirchberg. Das nicht-kommutative Michael-Auswahlprinzip und die Klassifikation nicht-einfacher Algebren. InC ∗-algebras (Münster, 1999), pages 92–141. Springer, Berlin, 2000

    work page 1999

  47. [47]

    Kirchberg and M

    E. Kirchberg and M. Rørdam. Infinite non-simpleC∗-algebras: absorbing the Cuntz algebrasO ∞.Adv. Math., 167(2):195–264, 2002

    work page 2002

  48. [48]

    Kirchberg and M

    E. Kirchberg and M. Rørdam. Central sequenceC∗-algebras and tensorial absorption of the Jiang-Su algebra.J. Reine Angew. Math., 695:175–214, 2014

    work page 2014

  49. [49]

    Kucerovsky and P

    D. Kucerovsky and P. W. Ng. The corona factorisation property and approximate unitary equivalence.Houston J. Math., 32(2):531–550, 2006

    work page 2006

  50. [50]

    Q. Li, D. Hadwin, and W. Liu. Approximate equivalence in von Neumann algebras. Oper. Matrices, 17(1):1–23, 2023

    work page 2023

  51. [51]

    Q. Li, J. Shen and R. Shi. A generalization of Voiculescu’s theorem for normal operators to semifinite von Neumann algebras.Adv. Math., 375:107347, 55, 2020

    work page 2020

  52. [52]

    H. Lin. Exponential rank ofC∗-algebras with real rank zero and the Brown-Pedersen conjectures.J. Funct. Anal., 114(1):1–11, 1993

    work page 1993

  53. [53]

    H. Lin. Classification of homomorphisms and dynamical systems.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 359(2):859–895, 2007

    work page 2007

  54. [54]

    H. Lin. Homomorphisms from AH-algebras.J. Topol. Anal., 9(1):67–125, 2017

    work page 2017

  55. [55]

    Loreaux and P

    J. Loreaux and P. W. Ng. Remarks on essential codimension.Integral Equations Operator Theory, 92(1):Paper No. 4, 35, 2020

    work page 2020

  56. [56]

    Loreaux, P

    J. Loreaux, P. W. Ng, and A. Sutradhar.K1-injectivity of the paschke dual algebra for certain simpleC ∗-algebras.Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 554(2):129947, 2026

    work page 2026

  57. [57]

    T. A. Loring.Lifting solutions to perturbing problems inC∗-algebras, volume 8 ofFields Institute Monographs. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1997

    work page 1997

  58. [58]

    Matui and Y

    H. Matui and Y. Sato. Strict comparison andZ-absorption of nuclearC ∗-algebras. Acta Math., 209(1):179–196, 2012. 42 SHANSHAN HUA AND STUART WHITE

    work page 2012

  59. [59]

    Thecoronafactorisationpropertyandrefinement monoids.Trans

    E.Ortega, F.Perera, andM.Rørdam. Thecoronafactorisationpropertyandrefinement monoids.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 363(9):4505–4525, 2011

    work page 2011

  60. [60]

    Ortega, F

    E. Ortega, F. Perera, and M. Rørdam. The corona factorisation property, stability, and the Cuntz semigroup of aC∗-algebra.Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN, (1):34–66, 2012

    work page 2012

  61. [61]

    W. L. Paschke.K-theory for commutants in the Calkin algebra.Pacific J. Math., 95(2):427–434, 1981

    work page 1981

  62. [62]

    G. K. Pedersen. Unitary extensions and polar decompositions in aC ∗-algebra.J. Operator Theory, 17(2):357–364, 1987

    work page 1987

  63. [63]

    G. K. Pedersen.C∗-algebras and their automorphism groups. Pure and Applied Math- ematics (Amsterdam). Academic Press, London, 2018. Second edition of [MR0548006], Edited and with a preface by Søren Eilers and Dorte Olesen

    work page 2018

  64. [64]

    F. Perera. The structure of positive elements forC ∗-algebras with real rank zero. International J. Math., 8 (1997), pp. 383–405

    work page 1997

  65. [65]

    M. A. Rieffel. Dimension and stable rank in theK-theory ofC∗-algebras.Proc. London Math. Soc. (3), 46(2):301–333, 1983

    work page 1983

  66. [66]

    M. Rørdam. Ideals in the multiplier algebra of a stableC∗-algebra.J. Operator Theory, 25(2):283–298, 1991

    work page 1991

  67. [67]

    M. Rørdam. Classification of nuclear, simpleC∗-algebras. InClassification of nuclear C ∗-algebras. Entropy in operator algebras, volume 126 ofEncyclopaedia Math. Sci., pages 1–145. Springer, Berlin, 2002

    work page 2002

  68. [68]

    M. Rørdam. StableC ∗-algebras. InOperator algebras and applications, volume 38 of Adv. Stud. Pure Math., pages 177–199. Math. Soc. Japan, Tokyo, 2004

    work page 2004

  69. [69]

    Rosenberg and C

    J. Rosenberg and C. Schochet. The Künneth theorem and the universal coefficient theorem for Kasparov’s generalizedK-functor.Duke Math. J., 55(2):431–474, 1987

    work page 1987

  70. [70]

    Schafhauser

    C. Schafhauser. A new proof of the Tikuisis-White-Winter theorem.J. Reine Angew. Math., 759:291–304, 2020

    work page 2020

  71. [71]

    Schafhauser

    C. Schafhauser. Subalgebras of simple AF-algebras.Ann. of Math. (2), 192(2):309–352, 2020

    work page 2020

  72. [72]

    Nuclear C*-algebras: 99 problems

    C. Schafhauser, A. Tikuisis, and S. White. NuclearC ∗-algebras: 99 problems. arXiv:2506.10902

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  73. [73]

    Schochet

    C. Schochet. Topological methods forC ∗-algebras. IV. Modphomology.Pacific J. Math., 114(2):447–468, 1984

    work page 1984

  74. [74]

    I. E. Segal. Irreducible representations of operator algebras.Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 53:73–88, 1947

    work page 1947

  75. [75]

    Skandalis

    G. Skandalis. Une notion de nucléarité enK-théorie (d’après J. Cuntz).K-Theory, 1(6):549–573, 1988

    work page 1988

  76. [76]

    K. Thomsen. Homotopy classes of∗-homomorphisms between stableC∗-algebras and their multiplier algebras.Duke Math. J., 61(1):67–104, 1990

    work page 1990

  77. [77]

    K. Thomsen. On absorbing extensions.Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 129(5):1409–1417, 2001

    work page 2001

  78. [78]

    Tikuisis, S

    A. Tikuisis, S. White, and W. Winter. Quasidiagonality of nuclearC∗-algebras.Ann. of Math. (2), 185(1):229–284, 2017

    work page 2017

  79. [79]

    Voiculescu

    D. Voiculescu. A non-commutative Weyl-von Neumann theorem.Rev. Roumaine Math. Pures Appl., 21(1):97–113, 1976

    work page 1976

  80. [80]

    S. Zhang. A Riesz decomposition property and ideal structure of multiplier algebras. J. Operator Theory, 24(2):209–225, 1990

    work page 1990

Showing first 80 references.