REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 54 references
Imaging scattering resonances in low-energy inelastic ND$_3$-H$_2$ collisions
T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read This paper reports resolved scattering resonances in a six-atom collision system, ND3 with H2 and HD — previously resolved only for systems of up to four atoms — and shows the data are reproduced only by a potential energy surface…
desk verdict A genuinely new six-atom resonance experiment with careful data, but the CCSDT(Q) uniqueness claim is overreaching and the paper's own SI gives the reason. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The argument is carried by a corrected potential energy surface plus a partial-wave analysis. The surface is five-dimensional, treating NH$_3$ and H$_2$ as rigid rotors, computed at the CCSD(T)/aVTZ level with midbond functions on a grid of 29,568 unique geometries, and corrected by adding a radial-only term $360 e^{-1.43R}$ cm$^{-1}$, obtained by averaging the CCSDT(Q)/aVDZ minus CCSD(T)/aVDZ difference over a few fixed orientations; this deepens the surface by about 2% and shifts the resonances downward into agreement with experiment. The scattering calculations solve the close-coupling equations in the body-fixed frame with a rotational basis up to $j = 6$ for ND$_3$ and $j_2 = 4$ for H$_2$/HD. The resonances are assigned by decomposing the scattering wave function in the conserved total angular momentum $J$ and parity $P$, reading off the entrance partial wave, the resonant partial wave $\ell_{res}$ of the quasi-bound state, and the exit partial wave; for the $1^{-}_{1} \to 1^{+}_{1}$ transition $\ell$ must change from even to odd or vice versa. Experimentally, the enabling mechanism is a 1+1′ REMPI scheme using vacuum-ultraviolet light that ionizes ND$_3$ with near-zero recoil, keeping the velocity-map images sharp enough to resolve each resonance's angular fingerprint.
What would settle it
Recompute the integral cross sections with a CCSDT(Q) correction evaluated on the full grid of orientations rather than the orientation-averaged radial fit $360 e^{-1.43R}$ cm$^{-1}$: if the predicted resonance positions near 1 cm$^{-1}$ move by more than the low-energy experimental resolution of about 0.1 cm$^{-1}$, the attribution of the agreement specifically to the CCSDT(Q) level is weakened. Independently, applying a static electric field in the crossing region and measuring the Stark shift of the $E = 1.23$ cm$^{-1}$ Feshbach resonance would test its assigned $2^{-}_{1}$, $\ell = 4$ quasi-bound character directly.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The paper claims that scattering resonances in the integral cross sections of the inversion-deexcitation transition ND$_3$($1^{-}_{1} \to 1^{+}_{1}$), induced by collisions with para-H$_2$ ($j_2 = 0$) or HD, are experimentally resolved across 0.5–25 cm$^{-1}$: three resonance features for each system, and a rapidly evolving angular structure in the differential cross sections, imaged with a newly developed near-recoil-free VUV 1+1′ REMPI scheme. The measured data can be reproduced only by close-coupling calculations on a new five-dimensional potential energy surface built at the CCSD(T)/aVTZ+mb level and augmented by a radial correction derived from CCSDT(Q)/aVDZ calculations; the previously available Maret surface, and all cheaper modifications tried (global scaling, shorter N–H bond length, explicit umbrella coordinate, different basis sets), fail to place the resonances correctly. A partial-wave analysis of the scattering wave functions characterizes the ten most prominent ND$_3$–H$_2$ resonances: nearly all are Feshbach resonances in which the pair temporarily occupies the asymptotically closed $2^{-}_{1}$ inversion-rotation level of ND$_3$, the two at 7.87 and 7.97 cm$^{-1}$ are shape resonances (centrifugal-barrier trapping), and the one at 14.47 cm$^{-1}$ is a combined Feshbach-shape resonance.
Load-bearing premise
The claim that only the CCSDT(Q)-corrected surface works rests on the assumption that a single orientation-averaged radial correction, $E = 360 e^{-1.43R}$ cm$^{-1}$ fitted from CCSDT(Q)/aVDZ calculations at a few fixed orientations, remains representative of the higher-order correlation effect across the entire five-dimensional potential surface.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- Resonance-resolved collision studies now reach six-atom systems: the combination of a Stark decelerator, a cryogenic secondary beam at low crossing angle, and near-recoil-free VUV ionization worked for ND$_3$, a strongly polar symmetric top, and this recipe is portable to other polar molecules that previously lacked imaging-compatible detection schemes.
- Predicting low-energy resonance positions for polyatomic complexes requires going beyond the CCSD(T) gold standard: only the surface with the CCSDT(Q) radial correction reproduced the measured integral cross sections, and simulated images based on the older surface did not capture the energy evolution of the differential cross sections.
- Because ND$_3$ has a strong, near-linear Stark effect, the resonances near 1 cm$^{-1}$ are expected to respond sensitively to experimentally attainable electric fields of about 75 kV/cm, enabling experiments that modify the collision dynamics with external fields.
- The demonstration of a recoil-free imaging scheme for ND$_3$ removes a long-standing detection bottleneck, so differential cross sections through resonances can now be probed for molecules beyond NO, not just integral cross sections.
Reading between the lines
- The paper notes that a uniform 2% scaling of the older potential nearly reproduces the CCSDT(Q) results, which suggests the main effect of the higher-order correction is an overall well-depth shift; a testable consequence is that a full-surface CCSDT(Q) calculation should preserve the resonance pattern and move positions only slightly, whereas a reshuffled pattern would point to the orientation-av
- The same apparatus could map the reverse $1^{+}_{1} \to 1^{-}_{1}$ transition or the isotopologues ND$_3$–D$_2$ and NH$_3$–H$_2$: since each resonance here is assigned to a specific closed rotational channel of ND$_3$, comparing isotope-shifted resonance patterns would separate mass and rotational-constant effects from electronic-structure error in the potential.
- The Feshbach assignments carry a direct, testable prediction for field control: the closed $2^{-}_{1}$ level and the open $1^{\pm}_{1}$ channels have different Stark shifts, so an applied electric field should move the 1.2 cm$^{-1}$ resonance in a calculable way — a first step toward engineering polyatomic resonances with external fields.
- Because the older surface is the one used in astrochemical models of ammonia inversion-line thermometry, the corrected resonance positions imply that low-temperature collisional excitation rates for ammonia in cold interstellar clouds may shift by a few percent, and the same crossed-beam method could measure those temperature-relevant rates directly.
Signed reviews
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. This paper reports a joint experimental and theoretical study of state-to-state inelastic collisions ND3(1-1 -> 1+1) + H2/HD in the collision-energy range 0.5-25 cm-1. Using Stark-decelerated ND3, a cryogenic hydrogen beam, and a new near-recoil-free VUV 1+1' REMPI detection scheme, the authors resolve resonance features in integral cross sections and energy-dependent differential cross sections, and characterize the resonances through close-coupling calculations and partial-wave analysis. The central claim is that the experimental data could only be reproduced with a new CCSD(T)/aVTZ+mb PES augmented by an isotropic CCSDT(Q)-CCSD(T) radial correction.
Significance. The experimental advance is substantial: this appears to be the first resolved scattering-resonance study for a six-atom system, and it extends high-resolution VMI imaging beyond NO-containing benchmark systems. The measurement is supported by careful calibration via three independent methods, state-purity checks, and Monte Carlo flux-to-density corrections, and the data are deposited for reuse. The theoretical interpretation is more fragile: the paper's own SI shows that a uniform 2% scaling of an earlier lower-level PES reproduces almost exactly the same cross sections as the new CCSDT(Q)-corrected PES, so the abstract's uniqueness claim is not established. The resonance assignments and partial-wave characterizations remain valuable and are largely independent of that uniqueness claim.
major comments (3)
- [Abstract; Results (Fig. 1); SI Note 4.6] The abstract's claim that the experimental data could only be reproduced with the CCSDT(Q)-corrected PES is not supported by the evidence presented in the manuscript and its SI. The main text (Results, discussion of Fig. 1) concedes that an intensity mismatch across the sampled collision energies remained even for this PES, and SI Note 4.6 states that with this PES the authors recover almost exactly the results obtained with the reference PES of Ref. [36] scaled by 2%. Because Suppl. Fig. 14 shows that a constant 1.02 scaling already brings the Maret PES resonance positions substantially closer to experiment, the ICS data do not uniquely select the CCSDT(Q) level. The authors should temper the uniqueness language in the abstract, Results, and Discussion, and should quantify the difference between the ET(Q)-corrected and 1.02-scaled Maret predictions, for example by reporting residuals or a chi-square comparison of the convoluted ICS.
- [SI Note 4.6] The correction E_CCSDT(Q)-CCSD(T) = 360 exp(-1.43R) cm-1 is derived from CCSDT(Q)-CCSD(T) differences at the aVDZ level for a few fixed angular coordinates and then added as a purely radial, isotropic term to the full 5D PES. The SI reports no test of how an orientation-resolved correction would change the angular expansion coefficients in Eq. S12, which are the terms that drive resonance positions and partial-wave mixing. The correction is also computed in aVDZ while being applied to an aVTZ+mb PES. The authors should explicitly identify this as an approximation and limitation in the main text, and should avoid claiming that the data require the CCSDT(Q) level without addressing the transferability of the radial-only correction.
- [Results, DCS comparison (Figs. 3-4)] The statement in Results that only the CCSD(T)+ET(Q) PES gave good agreement is supported only by visual comparison of experimental and simulated images; no quantitative metric is given for the DCS agreement, and the text itself reports a deviation in the backscattered region at 3.4 and 4.1 cm-1 attributed to a small resonance-position shift. Since the 1.02-scaled Maret PES was apparently not used to generate simulated DCS images, the visual comparison cannot establish that the ET(Q)-corrected PES is uniquely required. A quantitative comparison of DCS residuals for the candidate PESs would strengthen the theoretical conclusion.
minor comments (4)
- [Throughout] There are several typos in the main text: accross should be across, possiblities should be possibilities, unprecendented should be unprecedented, exquisit should be exquisite, and obervations should be observations.
- [References] Many references list the journal as J. Comp. Phys. where J. Chem. Phys. is clearly intended (e.g., refs. 1-4, 22-26, 47-48, 57, 63-64, and 79); the bibliography should be corrected.
- [SI Note 4.6] The SI should specify how many fixed angular coordinates were used for the CCSDT(Q)-CCSD(T) comparison and how the radial dependence was averaged; the statement that the results were almost identical for all orientations is qualitative and should be supported by showing the spread of the corrections.
- [Methods; SI Note 4.5] The main text states that CBS extrapolation to AVTZ and AVQZ gave incorrect results without explaining what is meant by incorrect; this is only clarified in SI Note 4.5 and would benefit from a cross-reference or a one-sentence summary in the main text.
Circularity Check
No circular derivation: predictions are ab initio and parameter-free; the 'only CCSDT(Q)' claim is overstated by the paper's own SI, but that is a non-uniqueness caveat, not circularity.
full rationale
The central derivation chain is not circular. The PESs, including the CCSD(T)/aVTZ+mb surface and the CCSDT(Q) correction, are computed from ab initio electronic structure calculations; no parameter is fitted to the measured resonance positions. The close-coupling scattering calculations use a stated basis and convergence checks. The CCSDT(Q) correction is derived from aVDZ CCSDT(Q)-CCSD(T) energy differences (SI Note 4.6), not from the scattering data, so the predicted cross sections are not constructed from the observable they claim to reproduce. The only qualifications are non-circular caveats. First, SI Note 4.6 states that the ET(Q)-corrected PES 'recover[s] almost exactly the results obtained with the reference PES of Ref. [36] scaled by 2%', and SI Note 4.2/Fig. 14 shows a 1.02 scaling of the Maret PES already shifts resonances toward the data; thus the abstract's 'could only be reproduced' overstates uniqueness. This is an evidential weakness in the uniqueness claim, not a circular reduction. Second, SI Note 3 uses theoretical ICS/DCS as input for the Monte Carlo density-to-flux correction of the experimental ICS; this is a smooth kinematic correction and does not inject the resonance features into the data. Self-citations to the same group's NO-He CCSDT(Q) work (refs 24 and 26) are motivational background; the present paper computes its own correction and therefore does not rest on those citations. Score 1 reflects these minor overlaps, with no step reducing to its inputs by construction.
Assumptions & free parameters
free parameters (1)
- ET(Q) radial correction coefficients =
360 cm^-1 amplitude, 1.43 a0^-1 decay in E=360*exp(-1.43*R)
assumptions (5)
- domain assumption The final PES treats ND3 and H2/HD as rigid rotors, with inversion modeled by a two-state tunneling model.
- domain assumption The CCSDT(Q) correction is orientation-independent and can be described by one radial function.
- domain assumption Born-Oppenheimer approximation allows the same PES for ND3-H2 and ND3-HD after a center-of-mass coordinate transformation.
- domain assumption The close-coupling scattering calculations are numerically converged with the chosen rotational basis (j<=6, j2<=4), radial grids, and J<=16.
- domain assumption CCSD(T)/aVTZ+mb is an accurate reference surface when supplemented by the ET(Q) correction.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Imaging scattering resonances in low-energy inelastic ND$_3$-H$_2$ collisions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EJHQB7VL
@misc{pith2026250611577,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Imaging scattering resonances in low-energy inelastic ND$_3$-H$_2$ collisions},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EJHQB7VL}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.11577}
}
abstract
A scattering resonance is one of the most striking quantum effects in low-temperature molecular collisions. Predicted decades ago theoretically, they have only been resolved experimentally for systems involving at most four atoms. Extension to more complex systems is essential to probe the true quantum nature of chemically more relevant processes, but is thus far hampered by major obstacles. Here, we present a joint experimental and theoretical study of scattering resonances in state-to-state inelastic collisions for the six-atom ND$_3$-H$_2$/HD systems across the collision energy range 0.5-25 cm$^{-1}$, bringing this type of experiment into the realm of polyatomic symmetric top molecules. Strong resonances are resolved in the integral cross sections, whereas differential cross sections are measured with high resolution using a laser ionization scheme involving VUV light. The experimental data could only be reproduced using theoretical predictions based on a potential energy surface at the CCSD(T) level of theory with corrections at the CCSDT(Q) level.
Figures
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[36]
Maret, S., Faure, A., Scifoni, E. & Wiesenfeld, L. On the robustness of the ammonia thermometer . Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 399, 425–431 (2009). 35
work page 2009
-
[1]
N., von Zastrow , A., Parker , D
Onvlee, J., Vogels, S. N., von Zastrow , A., Parker , D. H. & van de Meerakker , S. Y. T. Molecular collisions coming into focus. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 15768–15779 (2014)
work page 2014
-
[2]
von Zastrow , A. et al. State-resolved diffraction oscillations imaged for inelastic collisions of NO radicals with He, Ne and Ar . Nat. Chem. 6, 216–221 (2014)
work page 2014
-
[3]
de Jongh, T. et al. Imaging the onset of the resonance regime in low-energy NO-He collisions. Science 368, 626–630 (2020)
work page 2020
-
[4]
Blender - a 3D modelling and rendering package
Blender Online Community. Blender - a 3D modelling and rendering package . Blender Foundation, Stichting Blender Foundation, Amsterdam (2018). URL http://www.blender.org
work page 2018
-
[5]
A new high intensity and short-pulse molecular beam valve
Y an, B.et al. A new high intensity and short-pulse molecular beam valve. Rev. Sci. Inst. 84, 023102 (2013)
work page 2013
-
[6]
(ed.) Atomic and molecular beam methods , vol
Scoles, G. (ed.) Atomic and molecular beam methods , vol. 1 (Oxford, UK, 1988)
work page 1988
-
[7]
Pulsed supersonic beams from high pressure source: Simulation results and experimental measurements
Even, U. Pulsed supersonic beams from high pressure source: Simulation results and experimental measurements. Adv. Chem. 2014, 636042 (2014)
work page 2014
Show all 54 references
-
[8]
Hoge, H. J. & Arnold, R. D. Vapor pressures of hydrogen, deuterium, and hydrogen deuteride and dew-point pressures of their mixtures. J. Res. Natl. Bur . Stand. 47, 63–74 (1951)
1951
-
[9]
Vogels, S. N. et al. Scattering resonances in bimolecular collisions between NO radicals and H 2 challenge the theoretical gold standard. Nat. Chem. 10, 435 (2018)
2018
-
[10]
A., Kliner , D
Rinnen, K.-D., Buntine, M. A., Kliner , D. A. V., Zare, R. N. & Huo, W. M. Quantitative determination of H 2, HD, and D 2 internal-state distributions by (2+1) resonance-enhanced multiphoton ionization. J. Comp. Phys. 95, 214–225 (1991)
1991
-
[11]
Ashfold, M. N. R., Dixon, R. N., Stickland, R. J. & Western, C. M. 2+1 MPI spectroscopy of ~B1E′′ state NH 3 and ND 3: rotational analysis of the origin bands 138, 201 – 208 (1987)
1987
-
[12]
Ashfold, M. N. R., Dixon, R. N., Little, N., Stickland, R. J. & Western, C. M. The ~B1E′′ state of ammonia: sub-Doppler spectroscopy at vacuum ultraviolet energies. J. Comp. Phys. 89, 1754–1761 (1988)
1988
-
[13]
Tkáˇc, O. et al. State-to-state resolved differential cross sections for rotationally inelastic scattering of ND3 with He. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 477–488 (2014)
2014
-
[14]
Tkáˇc, O. et al. Rotationally inelastic scattering of ND 3 with H 2 as a probe of the intermolecular potential energy surface. Mol. Phys. 113, 3925–3933 (2015)
2015
-
[15]
& Van De Meerakker , S
Gao, Z., Loreau, J., Van Der Avoird, A. & Van De Meerakker , S. Y. T. Direct observation of product- pair correlations in rotationally inelastic collisions of ND 3 with D 2. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21, 14033–14041 (2019)
2019
-
[16]
Kuijpers, S. E. J. et al. Sensitive low-recoil VUV 1+1’ REMPI detection of ND 3. J. Phys. Chem. A 128, 10993–11004 (2024)
2024
-
[17]
& Wallenstein, R
Hilbig, R. & Wallenstein, R. T unable VUV radiation generated by two-photon resonant frequency mixing in xenon. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 19, 194–201 (1983). 34
1983
-
[18]
& Sato, T
Miyazaki, K., Sakai, H. & Sato, T. Two-photon resonances in Xe and Kr for the generation of tunable coherent extreme UV radiation. Appl. Optics 28, 699 (1989)
1989
-
[19]
Eppink, A. T. J. B. & Parker , D. H. Velocity map imaging of ions and electrons using electrostatic lenses: Application in photoelectron and photofragment ion imaging of molecular oxygen. Rev. Sci. Inst. 68, 3477–3484 (1997)
1997
-
[20]
& van de Meerakker , S
Plomp, V., Gao, Z. & van de Meerakker , S. Y. T. A velocity map imaging apparatus optimised for high-resolution crossed molecular beam experiments. Mol. Phys. 119, e1814437 (2020)
2020
-
[21]
T ownsend, D., Minitti, M. P. & Suits, A. G. Direct current slice imaging. Rev. Sci. Inst. 74, 2530–2539 (2003)
2003
-
[22]
J., Zhou, J., Shiu, W
Lin, J. J., Zhou, J., Shiu, W. & Liu, K. Application of time-sliced ion velocity imaging to crossed molecular beam experiments. Rev. Sci. Inst. 74, 2495–2500 (2003)
2003
-
[23]
Cremers, T. L. A Multistage Zeeman Decelerator for Molecular-Beam Scattering Experiments . Ph.D. thesis, Radboud University , Nijmegen, The Netherlands (2019). URL https://hdl.handle.net/ 2066/204153
2019
-
[24]
Shuai, Q. et al. Experimental and theoretical investigation of resonances in low-energy NO-H 2 collisions. J. Chem. Phys. 153, 244302 (2020)
2020
-
[25]
Western, C. M. Pgopher version 10.1 (2018). [26] Western, C. M. Pgopher: A program for simulating rotational, vibrational and electronic spectra. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 186, 221–242 (2017)
2018
-
[27]
AC trapping and high-resolution spectroscopy of ammonia molecules
van Veldhoven, J. AC trapping and high-resolution spectroscopy of ammonia molecules . Ph.D. thesis, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen (2006). URL https://hdl.handle.net/2066/29874
2006
-
[28]
von Zastrow , A., Onvlee, J., Parker , D. H. & van de Meerakker , S. Y. T. Analysis of velocity-mapped ion images from high-resolution crossed-beam scattering experiments: a tutorial review . EPJ T ech. Instrum. 2, 11 (2015)
2015
-
[29]
T ang, G. et al. Quantum state-resolved molecular dipolar collisions over four decades of energy . Science 379, 1031–1036 (2023)
2023
-
[30]
Dahl, D. A. SIMION Version 8.1 (2012). URL https://simion.com/
2012
-
[31]
Dahl, D. A. SIMION for the personal computer in reflection. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 200, 3–25 (2000)
2000
-
[32]
Klassische runge-kutta-formeln vierter und niedrigerer ordnung mit schrittweiten- kontrolle und ihre anwendung auf warmeleitungs-probleme
Fehlberg, E. Klassische runge-kutta-formeln vierter und niedrigerer ordnung mit schrittweiten- kontrolle und ihre anwendung auf warmeleitungs-probleme. Computing 6, 61–71 (1970)
1970
-
[33]
van de Meerakker , S. Y. T., Vanhaecke, N., Bethlem, H. L. & Meijer , G. Higher-order resonances in a Stark decelerator . Phys. Rev. A 71, 053409 (2005)
2005
-
[34]
van de Meerakker , S. Y. T., Vanhaecke, N., Bethlem, H. L. & Meijer , G. Transverse stability in a Stark decelerator .Phys. Rev. A 73, 023401 (2006)
2006
-
[35]
& van de Meerakker , S
Scharfenberg, L., Haak, H., Meijer , G. & van de Meerakker , S. Y. T. Operation of a Stark decelerator with optimum acceptance. Phys. Rev. A 79, 023410 (2009)
2009
-
[37]
Daniel, F. et al. Collisional excitation of singly deuterated ammonia NH 2D by H 2. Mon. Not. R. Astron Soc. 444, 2544–2554 (2014)
2014
-
[38]
Daniel, F. et al. Collisional excitation of doubly and triply deuterated ammonia ND 2H and ND 3 by H2. Mon. Not. R. Astron Soc. 457, 1535–1549 (2016)
2016
-
[39]
Ma, Q. et al. Resonances in rotationally inelastic scattering of NH 3 and ND 3 with H 2. J. Chem. Phys. 143, 044312 (2015)
2015
-
[40]
Bouhafs, N. et al. Collisional excitation of NH 3 by atomic and molecular hydrogen. Mon. Not. R. Astron Soc. 470, 2204–2211 (2017)
2017
-
[41]
& Faure, A
Demes, S., Lique, F., Loreau, J. & Faure, A. Collision-induced excitation of ammonia in warm interstellar and circumstellar environments. Mon. Not. R. Astron Soc. 524, 2368–2378 (2023)
2023
-
[42]
& Dagdigian, P
Loreau, J., Faure, A., Lique, F., Demes, S. & Dagdigian, P. J. Hyperfine collisional excitation of ammonia by molecular hydrogen. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 526, 3213–3218 (2023)
2023
-
[43]
Hanwell, M. D. et al. Avogadro: an advanced semantic chemical editor , visualization, and analysis platform. J. Cheminf. 4 (2012)
2012
-
[44]
R., Maluendes, S., McLean, A
Phillips, T. R., Maluendes, S., McLean, A. D. & Green, S. Anisotropic rigid rotor potential energy function for H 2O–H2. J. Chem. Phys. 101, 5824–5830 (1994)
1994
-
[45]
B., van de Meerakker , S
Gubbels, K. B., van de Meerakker , S. Y. T., Groenenboom, G. C., Meijer , G. & van der Avoird, A. Scattering resonances in slow NH 3-He collisions. J. Comp. Phys. 136, 074301 (2012)
2012
-
[46]
& Van der Avoird, A
Loreau, J. & Van der Avoird, A. Scattering of NH 3 and ND 3 with rare gas atoms at low collision energy .J. Chem. Phys. 143, 184303 (2015)
2015
-
[47]
& van der Avoird, A
Loreau, J. & van der Avoird, A. Vibrational energy transfer in ammonia–helium collisions. Faraday Discuss. 251, 249–261 (2024)
2024
-
[48]
Huang, X., Schwenke, D. W. & Lee, T. J. An accurate global potential energy surface, dipole moment surface, and rovibrational frequencies for NH 3. J. Chem. Phys. 129, 214304 (2008)
2008
-
[49]
private communication
Lee, T. private communication. [50] Tkáˇc, O. et al. Rotationally inelastic scattering of quantum-state-selected ND 3 with Ar. J. Phys. Chem. A 119, 5979–5987 (2015)
2015
-
[51]
& Nesbitt, D
van der Avoird, A. & Nesbitt, D. J. Rovibrational states of the H 2O–H2 complex: An ab initio calculation. J. Chem. Phys. 134, 044314 (2011)
2011
-
[52]
& Rabitz, H
Ho, T.-S. & Rabitz, H. A general method for constructing multidimensional molecular potential energy surfaces from ab initio calculations. J. Chem. Phys. 104, 2584–2597 (1996)
1996
-
[53]
Cybulski, S. M. & T oczyłowski, R. R. Ground state potential energy curves for He 2, Ne 2, Ar 2, He-Ne, He-Ar, and Ne-Ar: A coupled-cluster study . J. Chem. Phys. 111, 10520–10528 (1999)
1999
-
[54]
& van der Avoird, A
Loreau, J., Liévin, J., Scribano, Y. & van der Avoird, A. Potential energy surface and bound states of the NH 3–Ar and ND 3–Ar complexes. J. Chem. Phys. 141, 224303 (2014)
2014
-
[55]
The MRCC program system: Accurate quantum chemistry from water to proteins
Kállay , M.et al. The MRCC program system: Accurate quantum chemistry from water to proteins. J. Chem. Phys. 152, 074107 (2020)
2020
-
[56]
Energy transfer in NH 3–He collisions
Green, S. Energy transfer in NH 3–He collisions. J. Chem. Phys. 73, 2740–2750 (1980). 36
1980
Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.