Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 4 minor 36 references

Differences in Neurovascular Coupling in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder: Evidence from Simultaneous Resting-State EEG-fNIRS

T0 review · 5 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In resting-state EEG-fNIRS, maintenance-phase MDD patients show stronger neurovascular coupling than healthy controls, while acute patients show an abbreviated dip-to-peak interval that lengthens with recovery.

desk verdict A worthwhile pilot question with a real first-of-kind method, but the central mNVC_R finding is not yet trustworthy because the metric is under-specified and the 0.1 Hz Mayer wave is left in the data. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.11634 v1 pith:LPNXFMKL submitted 2025-06-13 q-bio.NC

Feng Yan , Xiaobin Wang , Yao Zhao , Shuyi Yang , Zhiren Wang This is my paper · ORCID
classification q-bio.NC
keywords neurovascularcouplingmajordepressivedisorderresting-stateEEGfunctionalnear-infraredspectroscopyglobalfieldpowerinitialdipprefrontalcortexrecoverybiomarker
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Neurovascular coupling is the chain by which local neural firing raises regional blood flow to meet energy demand. This paper asks whether that chain is altered in major depressive disorder and whether it normalizes during recovery, using a wearable cap that records EEG and fNIRS simultaneously during rest. The authors find that coupling strength is highest in maintenance-phase patients, significantly above healthy controls in the eyes-open condition, and that the time from the initial oxygen-dip to the peak of coupling is compressed in acute depression and gradually lengthens toward healthy values as patients recover. If correct, these resting-state measures offer an objective, low-cost way to monitor depression stage and recovery without task compliance.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a resting-state neurovascular coupling assay built from simultaneous EEG-fNIRS. Global field power (GFP), the spatial spread of EEG voltage, is computed only over the prefrontal and temporal regions covered by fNIRS, and the top five GFP peaks in each resting epoch are treated as spontaneous neural events. For each peak, the Spearman correlation between interpolated EEG activation and total hemoglobin (HbT) over the following eight seconds defines the coupling response; the maximum within a hand-set 2–8 second window is mNVC_R, and the preceding negative excursion is called the initial dip (mID_R). The time from the initial dip to the coupling peak, mNVC-T, is the study's central timing measure. This design replaces stimulus-locked averaging with endogenous neural peaks, aiming to avoid habituation and attentional confounds that plague oddball paradigms in depressed patients.

What would settle it

Recompute the group comparisons after removing the ~0.1 Hz Mayer-wave component from each hemoglobin channel, or after repeating the coupling calculation using time-shifted EEG peaks as controls; if the maintenance-versus-healthy difference in coupling strength or the acute-versus-healthy difference in dip-to-peak timing vanishes, the reported effect is a slow-oscillation artifact rather than neurovascular coupling.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that neurovascular coupling consistency is not uniformly reduced in depression but is phase-dependent: maintenance-phase patients show the strongest EEG-to-hemoglobin correlation, while acute-phase patients show an abnormally short interval from the initial dip of oxygen consumption to the neurovascular coupling peak. Concretely, maintenance patients had significantly higher maximum coupling response coefficients than healthy controls in eyes-open rest (0.2678 versus 0.1566, p<0.05), acute and maintenance patients showed deeper initial dips than healthy controls in eyes-closed rest, and the eyes-closed dip-to-peak interval was shortest in acute patients, intermediate in maintenance patients, and longest in healthy controls. This interval correlated negatively with depression and anxiety scale scores, and the authors interpret the pattern as an over-responsive neurovascular feedback loop in acute depression that gradually normalizes, with longer-term illness possibly leading to vascular aging or reduced hemoglobin-carrying capacity.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes that a spontaneous burst of coordinated brain electrical activity behaves like an evoked neural event, so that the strongest brain-signal-to-blood-flow correlation in a fixed two-to-eight-second window isolates neurovascular coupling rather than reflecting slow blood-pressure oscillations or the arbitrary choice of a 0.1 correlation cutoff.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the timing metric mNVC-T reflects the state of the neurovascular feedback loop, acute depression can be characterized as an over-responsive, prematurely peaking vascular response, with remission returning the interval toward healthy values.
  • The eyes-open specificity of the coupling-strength difference suggests that externally oriented attention states reveal neurovascular alterations that eyes-closed rest masks, so recording both conditions is necessary for monitoring.
  • Because mNVC-T correlates negatively with HAMD, HAMA, BDI, and SAS scores, combining this timing metric with clinical scales could improve tracking of recovery progress in outpatient settings.
  • A wearable, reusable EEG-fNIRS system capable of these measurements could carry neurovascular coupling assessment outside the scanner, making repeated longitudinal monitoring feasible.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, a within-subject longitudinal design that follows the same acute patients into maintenance would separate the reported timing recovery from chronic medication effects, since SSRIs themselves can alter endothelial function; the present cross-sectional comparison cannot make that separation.
  • Beyond the paper, a sensitivity analysis varying the 2–8 second window and the 0.1 correlation threshold would test whether the group differences are stable or artifacts of those choices; the paper does not report such a sweep.
  • Beyond the paper, if the shortened dip-to-peak interval really reflects an over-responsive neurovascular loop, a breath-hold or carbon-dioxide vascular reactivity test combined with the same EEG-fNIRS setup should show correspondingly faster or larger vascular responses in acute patients.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents a simultaneous resting-state EEG-fNIRS study of neurovascular coupling (NVC) in major depressive disorder. The authors define a metric NVC_R as the Spearman correlation between EEG-derived activation (global field power peaks) and total hemoglobin (HbT) in an 8-second window following each peak, and extract the maximum correlation mNVC_R in a 2–8 s window as the NVC strength. They report that maintenance-phase MDD patients have significantly higher mNVC_R than healthy controls, that acute-phase patients show a shorter interval (mNVC-T) from the initial dip to the NVC peak, and that this interval increases with recovery. They also report correlations between mNVC-T and clinical scales, proposing it as a potential biomarker.

Significance. If the findings were robust, this would be a novel and clinically useful multimodal biomarker for MDD phase and recovery, and the portable EEG-fNIRS system is a practical contribution. However, the study is small (final n=28), the primary endpoint is a hand-crafted selection statistic, and the analysis does not control for systemic physiological oscillations. The strengths of the paper are the hardware design and the ecological resting-state paradigm, but the statistical and methodological issues currently preclude drawing reliable conclusions about NVC differences.

major comments (5)
  1. [Section 2.5 and 4.1] The fNIRS band-pass filter (0.05–0.7 Hz) preserves ~0.1 Hz oscillations that the authors identify as Mayer waves in Section 4.1 and Figure 6. Because mNVC_R (Section 2.7) is the maximum Spearman correlation between EEG-derived activation and HbT in a 2–8 s window after each GFP peak, it is a selection statistic over a ~6 s window; chance alignment of GFP peaks with ongoing 0.1 Hz HbT fluctuations can produce large correlations. Without regressing out systemic oscillations or using short-separation channels, the group difference in mNVC_R (Section 3.1) may reflect differences in systemic vascular physiology rather than neurovascular coupling. This confound directly undermines the central claim.
  2. [Section 2.7] The inclusion criterion for the initial dip analysis (mNVC_R > 0.1) is arbitrary and applied at the individual level. The manuscript does not report how many GFP peaks or epochs were excluded in each group under this threshold. If exclusion rates differ across groups, the subsequent comparisons of mID_R, mID_RT, and mNVC-T (Sections 3.2–3.3) are biased; the reported group differences may be an artifact of differential selection rather than a physiological effect.
  3. [Section 3.1 and Table 2] The study tests a large number of derived metrics (mNVC_R, mNVC_RT, mID_R, mID_RT, mNVC-T, ΔmNVC-R) across eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions, yet reports uncorrected p-values and several 'marginally significant' results (0.05<p<0.1) as evidence. Table 2 claims Bonferroni correction, but the text reports raw p-values; no corrected p-values are given. With a healthy-control group of n=6, the ANOVA F(2,25)=3.5775 and the post hoc MG vs HC comparison (p<0.01) are fragile and not robust to outliers or non-normality. The abstract's 'significantly higher' claim is not supported after accounting for multiple comparisons.
  4. [Section 3 and 2.2] Of 55 recruited participants, only 28 were analyzed (~49% exclusion), predominantly due to fNIRS signal quality. The final groups are severely unbalanced (12, 10, and 6). The exclusion process is likely non-random with respect to group (e.g., hair characteristics, age, medication), but no comparison of included vs excluded participants is provided. This selection bias, combined with the small healthy-control group, makes the reported group differences unreliable.
  5. [Section 4.3] The correlation coefficients between mNVC-T_EC and clinical scales (HAMD -0.4084, HAMA -0.4168, BDI -0.3266, SAS -0.2745) are reported without p-values, confidence intervals, or correction for multiple testing. These correlations underpin the biomarker claim, but with n=28 across three groups they are not statistically established. Moreover, mNVC-T is derived from the same selection-based measures criticized above, so the correlations inherit their confounds.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.1] The phrase 'at least 1 months of training' should be 'at least 1 month of training'.
  2. [Section 3.3] The p-value range '0.5<p<0.1' appears to be a typo for '0.05<p<0.1'; the subsequent '0.1<p<0.15' is an unusual notation and should be clarified.
  3. [Section 4.1] The sentence 'our study did observe such differences in EEG amplitude in this group' is confusing; given the context, it likely should read 'did not observe'.
  4. [Figure 6] The caption uses 'eye-close' where 'eyes-closed' would be more consistent with the text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the NVC metrics are empirically defined from resting-state data and group comparisons are not equivalent to the metric definitions by construction.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are empirical group comparisons of a newly defined resting-state neurovascular coupling metric (mNVC_R) and derived timing measures (mID_R, mNVC-T). No equation or fitting step makes a predicted quantity equal to an input by construction. The 2–8 s window is set from prior oddball NVC latency literature, not fitted to the present group differences; the mNVC_R > 0.1 threshold for initial-dip inclusion is applied uniformly and is not a tuned parameter that forces the reported between-group effects. The authors acknowledge ~0.1 Hz Mayer waves in Section 4.1 and do not regress them out, and the biomarker is validated only on the same dataset that defined it, but these are concerns about confound control and generalizability, not circularity under the specified patterns. No load-bearing self-citation chain, imported uniqueness theorem, or ansatz-smuggling via citation is present. The derivation chain is self-contained in the sense that the statistics follow from the stated definitions; potential invalidity from systemic oscillations would be a correctness or confound issue, not a circular-reasoning issue.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The paper contributes an empirical measure rather than a derivation, so the ledger is dominated by domain assumptions about what the EEG-fNIRS correlation means. The main hand-chosen parameters are the NVC window, the initial dip threshold, and the peak count. The proposed biomarkers are invented metrics without independent validation.

free parameters (4)
  • NVC correlation window = 2-8 s after GFP peak
    Hand-chosen window based on healthy NVC latency of 4-6 s plus 2 s margins; not data-fitted but determines the mNVC_R outcome and is applied across all groups.
  • Initial dip inclusion threshold = mNVC_R > 0.1
    Subjects or epochs with mNVC_R below 0.1 are excluded from initial dip analysis, a hand-set cut-off that can bias mID_R estimates.
  • Number of GFP peaks per epoch = 5
    Top 5 GFP peaks per epoch were selected; no justification is given for 5, and the count affects the correlation estimates.
  • fNIRS trigger delay adjustment = 0.5 s
    Observation window shifted 0.5 s earlier to account for a 0.4 s minimum fNIRS trigger interval; hand-adjusted based on device specifications.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Resting-state GFP peaks represent discrete neural activation events that should trigger hemodynamic responses analogous to evoked responses.
    Section 2.6 introduces GFP peak detection as a substitute for task-evoked P300; the entire NVC analysis assumes this equivalence.
  • domain assumption fNIRS HbT changes in the 8 s after a GFP peak reflect local neurovascular coupling rather than systemic physiological oscillations.
    Section 2.7 and Discussion 4.1 use HbT as the NVC readout; the authors acknowledge 0.1 Hz Mayer waves but do not regress out systemic physiology.
  • domain assumption Clinical phase categories (acute, maintenance) based on treatment duration correspond to biologically distinct neurovascular states.
    Section 2.2 defines phases by time since diagnosis and treatment duration; no independent biological verification is provided.
  • domain assumption Beer-Lambert law with PPF=6 converts optical density to hemoglobin concentration in this cap configuration.
    Section 2.5 applies beer_lambert_law; partial pathlength factor is a standard but unverified assumption for this custom montage.
invented entities (2)
  • NVC_R and mNVC_R
    purpose: Quantify consistency between EEG activation and HbT after GFP peaks, used as the outcome for group comparisons.
    The metric is newly defined in this paper and has no external validation or falsifiable handle outside the same dataset.
  • mNVC-T (maximum neurovascular coupling time interval)
    purpose: Proposed biomarker of depression recovery, correlated with symptom scales.
    Correlations are computed in the same 28 subjects used to define the metric; no independent cohort or prospective prediction is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Differences in Neurovascular Coupling in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder: Evidence from Simultaneous Resting-State EEG-fNIRS." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LPNXFMKL

@misc{pith2026250611634,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Differences in Neurovascular Coupling in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder: Evidence from Simultaneous Resting-State EEG-fNIRS},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LPNXFMKL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.11634}
}
read the original abstract

Neurovascular coupling (NVC) refers to the process by which local neural activity, through energy consumption, induces changes in regional cerebral blood flow to meet the metabolic demands of neurons. Event-related studies have shown that the hemodynamic response typically lags behind neural activation by 4-6 seconds. However, little is known about how NVC is altered in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and throughout the recovery process. In this study, we employed simultaneous resting-state electroencephalography (rsEEG) and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to monitor neural and hemodynamic signals. Twelve patients with MDD during the acute phase, ten patients in the maintenance or consolidation phase, and six healthy controls were involved. We calculated the differences in coherence and temporal delay between spontaneous peak electrophysiological activity and hemodynamic responses across groups during the resting state in the prefrontal cortex (PFC). We found that the neural activity and its subsequent correlation with hemodynamic responses were significantly higher in patients during the maintenance phase. The rise time from the lowest to the highest point of correlation was shorter in healthy individuals than in patients in the acute phase, and gradually recovered during remission. By leveraging wearable neuroimaging techniques, this study reveals alterations in neurovascular coupling in depression and offers novel multimodal insights into potential biomarkers for MDD and its recovery process.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.11634 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Fig.1. (A) and (B) depict the customized cap design. In (B), red circles indicate the positions of fNIRS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Fig.2. The preprocessing pipelines of EEG and fNIRS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Fig.4. The example of the maximum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Fig.5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Beijing Huilongguan Hospital, Peking University Huilongguan Clinical Medical School, Beijing, China

    work page

  2. [2]

    Tsinghua Laboratory of Brain and Intelligence

    work page

  3. [3]

    AI Innovation Center, Tsinghua Pearl River Delta Research Institute

    work page

  4. [4]

    Department of Psychology, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Beijing Forestry University

    work page

  5. [5]

    Event-related studies have shown that the hemodynamic response typically lags behind neural activation by 4–6 seconds

    Xinya College, Tsinghua University # These authors contributed equally Abstract: Neurovascular coupling (NVC) refers to the process by which local neural activity, through energy consumption, induces changes in regional cerebral blood flow to meet the metabolic demands of neurons. Event-related studies have shown that the hemodynamic response typically la...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Introduction Major depressive disorder (MDD) as a representative affective disorder currently affects over 280 million people worldwide, posing a significant public health challenge that demands urgent attention [1]. Over the past few decades, the diagnosis of MDD has progressed from relying solely on behavioral assessments and self -report questionnaires...

    work page

  7. [7]

    initial dip

    Methods 2.1 Experiment Design： Data collection was conducted in a n office setting to simulate realistic and potentially practical application environments. Upon signing the informed consent form, each participant was asked to complete two self -report questionnaires: the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), which typic...

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    The overall data rejection rate approached 50%, primarily due to poor-quality fNIRS recordings

    Results After preprocessing the EEG and fNIRS data, a total of 12 acute -phase MDD patients, 10 maintenance-phase patients, and 6 healthy controls were included in the final analysis. The overall data rejection rate approached 50%, primarily due to poor-quality fNIRS recordings. While the quality could have been improved to expose the scalp optodes throug...

    work page

Show all 36 references
  1. [9]

    top -left corner

    Discussion In the present study, we utilized simultaneous EEG -fNIRS recording to investigate and compare neurovascular coupling (NVC) effects in the prefrontal cortex among healthy controls and patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) in either the acute or maintenance p...

    2022

  2. [10]

    World Health Organization. (2023). Depression. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/depression

    2023

  3. [11]

    B., & Davidson, R

    Henriques, J. B., & Davidson, R. J. (1991). Left frontal hypoactivation in depression. Journal of abnormal psychology, 100(4), 535–545. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-843x.100.4.535

    1991 doi

  4. [12]

    Jaworska, N., Blier, P ., Fusee, W., & Knott, V. (2012). α Power, α asymmetry and anterior cingulate cortex activity in depressed males and females. Journal of psychiatric research, 46(11), 1483–1491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.08.003

    2012 doi

  5. [13]

    D., Flores, B

    Greicius, M. D., Flores, B. H., Menon, V., Glover, G. H., Solvason, H. B., Kenna, H., Reiss, A. L., & Schatzberg, A. F. (2007). Resting-state functional connectivity in major depression: abnormally increased contributions from subgenual cingulate cortex and thalamus. Biologica...

    2007 doi

  6. [15]

    Chao, J., Zheng, S., Wu, H., Wang, D., Zhang, X., Peng, H., & Hu, B. (2021). fNIRS Evidence for Distinguishing Patients With Major Depression and Healthy Controls. IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Med...

    2021

  7. [16]

    M., Rush, A

    Williams, L. M., Rush, A. J., Koslow, S. H., Wisniewski, S. R., Cooper, N. J., Nemeroff, C. B., Schatzberg, A. F., & Gordon, E. (2011). International Study to Predict Optimized Treatment for Depression (iSPOT-D), a randomized clinical trial: rationale and protocol. Trials, 12,...

    2011 doi

  8. [17]

    Zheng, W.-L., Liu, W., Lu, Y ., Lu, B.-L., & Cichocki, A. (2019). EmotionMeter: A multimodal framework for recognizing human emotions. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 49(3), 1110–1122. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2018.2797176

    2019

  9. [18]

    Su, WC., Dashtestani, H., Miguel, H.O. et al. Simultaneous multimodal fNIRS-EEG recordings reveal new insights in neural activity during motor execution, observation, and imagery. Sci Rep 13, 5151 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31609-5

    2023 doi

  10. [19]

    Warbrick T. (2022). Simultaneous EEG-fMRI: What Have We Learned and What Does the Future Hold?. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 22(6), 2262. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22062262

    2022 doi

  11. [20]

    A., Chan, F

    Phillips, A. A., Chan, F. H., Zheng, M. M., Krassioukov, A. V., & Ainslie, P . N. (2016). Neurovascular coupling in humans: Physiology, methodological advances and clinical implications. Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Soci...

    2016 doi

  12. [21]

    P ., Horovitz, S

    Kennan, R. P ., Horovitz, S. G., Maki, A., Yamashita, Y ., Koizumi, H., & Gore, J. C. (2002). Simultaneous recording of event-related auditory oddball response using transcranial near infrared optical topography and surface EEG. NeuroImage, 16(3 Pt 1), 587–592. https://doi.org...

    2002

  13. [22]

    Tarantini, S., Tran, C. H. T., Gordon, G. R., Ungvari, Z., & Csiszar, A. (2017). Impaired neurovascular coupling in aging and Alzheimer's disease: Contribution of astrocyte dysfunction and endothelial impairment to cognitive decline. Experimental gerontology, 94, 52–58. https:...

    2017 doi

  14. [23]

    Banasr, M., Sanacora, G., & Esterlis, I. (2021). Macro- and Microscale Stress-Associated Alterations in Brain Structure: Translational Link With Depression. Biological psychiatry, 90(2), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.04.004

    2021 doi

  15. [24]

    Stewart, V., Judd, C., & Wheeler, A. J. (2022). Practitioners' experiences of deteriorating personal hygiene standards in people living with depression in Australia: A qualitative study. Health & social care in the community, 30(4), 1589–1598. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13491

    2022 doi

  16. [25]

    Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b

    Polich J. Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Oct;118(10):2128-48. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019. Epub 2007 Jun 18. PMID: 17573239; PMCID: PMC2715154

    2007 doi

  17. [26]

    PLOS ONE 19(5): e0304356

    Holmes M, Aalto D, Cummine J (2024) Opening the dialogue: A preliminary exploration of hair color, hair cleanliness, light, and motion effects on fNIRS signal quality. PLOS ONE 19(5): e0304356. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304356

    2024 doi

  18. [27]

    Temporal derivative distribution repair (tddr): a motion correction method for fNIRS

    Frank A Fishburn, Ruth S Ludlum, Chandan J Vaidya, and Andrei V Medvedev. Temporal derivative distribution repair (tddr): a motion correction method for fNIRS. NeuroImage, 184:171–179, 2019. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.025

    2019 doi

  19. [28]

    Kilpeläinen, R., Koistinen, A., Könönen, M., Herrgård, E., Partanen, J., & Karhu, J. (1999). P300 sequence effects differ between children and adults for auditory stimuli. Psychophysiology, 36(3), 343–350. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0048577299981337

    1999 doi

  20. [29]

    B., Fus, D., Subramaniapillai, M., Lee, Y ., & McIntyre, R

    Pan, Z., Park, C., Brietzke, E., Zuckerman, H., Rong, C., Mansur, R. B., Fus, D., Subramaniapillai, M., Lee, Y ., & McIntyre, R. S. (2019). Cognitive impairment in major depressive disorder. CNS spectrums, 24(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1092852918001207

    2019 doi

  21. [30]

    Hu, X., & Yacoub, E. (2012). The story of the initial dip in fMRI. NeuroImage, 62(2), 1103–

    2012

  22. [32]

    J., & McAlpine, D

    Luke, R., Shader, M. J., & McAlpine, D. (2021). Characterization of Mayer-wave oscillations in functional near-infrared spectroscopy using a physiologically informed model of the neural power spectra. Neurophotonics, 8(4), 041001. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.8.4.041001

    2021 doi

  23. [33]

    A., & Roberts, A

    Pizzagalli, D. A., & Roberts, A. C. (2022). Prefrontal cortex and depression. Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 47(1), 225–246. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-021-01101-7

    2022 doi

  24. [34]

    M., Sianis, A., Ajdini, E., Maneta, E., Kokras, N., Stamatelopoulos, K., & Georgiopoulos, G

    Delialis, D., Mavraganis, G., Dimoula, A., Patras, R., Dimopoulou, A. M., Sianis, A., Ajdini, E., Maneta, E., Kokras, N., Stamatelopoulos, K., & Georgiopoulos, G. (2022). A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on endothel...

    2022 doi

  25. [35]

    T., Pei, J

    Feng, Y . T., Pei, J. Y ., Wang, Y . P ., & Feng, X. F. (2024). Association between depression and vascular aging: a comprehensive analysis of predictive value and mortality risks. Journal of affective disorders, 367, 632–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.08.100

    2024 doi

  26. [36]

    J., Clarke, A

    Barry, R. J., Clarke, A. R., Johnstone, S. J., Magee, C. A., & Rushby, J. A. (2007). EEG differences between eyes-closed and eyes-open resting conditions. Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 118(12), 2765–277...

    2007 doi

  27. [37]

    Lu, B., Nagappan, G., & Lu, Y . (2014). BDNF and synaptic plasticity, cognitive function, and dysfunction. Handbook of experimental pharmacology, 220, 223–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45106-5_9

    2014 doi

  28. [1108]

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.005

    2012 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.