Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 300 references

The mutual influence of disequilibrium composition and temperature in exoplanet atmospheres

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For irradiated gas giants, disequilibrium chemistry moves dayside temperatures by at most 100 K, with TiO photodestruction and CH4- or O2-dominated secondary atmospheres as the exceptions.

desk verdict A transparent, well-benchmarked 1D chemistry-temperature model whose main gas-giant result is credible, but the headline TiO exception rests on a guessed photodissociation cross section that needs a sensitivity test. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.11658 v1 pith:DXAEOGRW submitted 2025-06-13 astro-ph.EP

Marcelino Agundez This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EP
keywords exoplanetatmospheresdisequilibriumchemistryradiative-convectiveequilibriumphotochemistrythermochemicalkineticshotJupiterstitaniumoxidesecondary
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper investigates whether a planet atmosphere's departure from chemical equilibrium feeds back on its own temperature. The author builds a 1D model that solves the vertical temperature profile and the time-dependent disequilibrium composition together, coupling thermochemical kinetics, photochemistry, and vertical mixing with radiative-convective equilibrium, and applies it to the gas giants WASP-33b, HD 209458b, HD 189733b, GJ 436b, and GJ 1214b plus a set of plausible secondary atmospheres. The central result is that for irradiated gas giants with solar to supersolar metallicity, disequilibrium chemistry changes the dayside temperature by at most about 100 K, because the species that dominate opacity — H2O, CO2, CO, and CH4 — are not seriously modified. The exceptions are hot Jupiters, where UV photodestruction of TiO above about 1 mbar removes a strong visible absorber and can shift temperatures by several hundred K, and secondary atmospheres dominated by CH4 or O2, where the composition is heavily processed. The TiO-driven effect is explicitly uncertain, since the photodissociation cross section of TiO is an educated guess and photoionization may compete.

What carries the argument

The central object is the coupled 1D model named PACT (Planetary Atmosphere Chemistry and Temperature), a code that solves the vertical distribution of temperature and chemical composition as a function of time using a time-dependent chemistry module and a radiative-convective module that are re-evaluated together. The chemistry module integrates a continuity-transport equation for 164 neutral species connected by 2352 forward reactions, with reverse rates set by detailed balance, photolysis rates from UV radiative transfer, and vertical mixing via eddy and molecular diffusion. The radiative-convective module computes the temperature from two-stream radiative transfer using k-tables built from line lists, and returns to the chemistry module at logarithmically spaced intermediate times so that the composition feels the temperature changes it has caused. Comparing the self-consistent steady state against a run with the initial chemical-equilibrium temperature held fixed isolates the mutual influence in each direction.

What would settle it

Measure the UV photodissociation cross section of TiO over roughly 100–250 nm, along with its branching ratio against photoionization, in the laboratory. If the cross section is more than an order of magnitude below the assumed value of about $10^{-18}\ \mathrm{cm}^2$ at wavelengths that reach hot-Jupiter upper atmospheres, the predicted TiO depletion above about 1 mbar and the associated temperature change of hundreds of kelvin would not occur.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the mutual feedback between disequilibrium composition and temperature is weak for the most commonly observed class of exoplanets, irradiated gas giants with solar or supersolar metallicity. Across the five modeled giants, the self-consistent steady-state dayside temperature differs from the chemical-equilibrium profile by less than about 100 K, even where the composition deviates strongly from equilibrium, because the opacity-controlling species H2O, CO2, CO, and CH4 keep their abundances near equilibrium values under photochemical and kinetic processing. The single large effect found is TiO: the model predicts that stellar UV photons photodissociate TiO in hot Jupiters above pressures of about 1 mbar, removing a strong visible-wavelength absorber and altering the temperature by several hundred K, while atomic titanium released by the destruction can warm the uppermost layers. The author stresses that this TiO-driven excursion is not secure, because the adopted photodissociation cross section is a guess, the ionization threshold lies below the dissociation threshold so photoionization probably competes, and TiO chemistry itself is poorly known. For secondary atmospheres, the same opacity logic applies: H2O- and CO2-dominated atmospheres keep their temperature structure, while CH4-dominated reducing and O2-dominated oxidizing atmospheres undergo serious temperature changes because disequilibrium chemistry heavily reprocesses their composition.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the photodissociation cross section used to deplete TiO in hot Jupiters is correct, yet the paper states this cross section is an educated guess that is not known, and photoionization likely competes with it, so a smaller or differently shaped real cross section would erase the several-hundred-kelvin temperature effect attributed to TiO.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Retrievals that assume chemical equilibrium should recover accurate dayside temperature structures for solar-metallicity irradiated gas giants, since the opacity carriers H2O, CO2, CO, and CH4 are stable against disequilibrium; the under-100-K errors are typically within retrieval uncertainties.
  • Hot Jupiters with observable TiO may be the exception: if UV photodestruction depletes TiO above about 1 mbar, the temperature profile there changes by several hundred K, so these planets need coupled chemistry–temperature modeling rather than equilibrium retrievals.
  • Secondary atmospheres dominated by CH4 (reducing) or O2 (oxidizing) are the regimes where the feedback matters most; trace photochemical products like nitrogen oxides can set the opacity and dominate the thermal structure even when the bulk gas is infrared-transparent.
  • For the five gas giants studied, the reverse direction — temperature feedback altering composition — is small: abundances change by at most a factor of a few when the temperature is allowed to evolve self-consistently, so standard fixed-temperature chemistry models remain adequate for composition.
  • The conclusions generalize to any ultrahot Jupiter: at dayside temperatures above about 3000 K the composition is pinned to chemical equilibrium, so disequilibrium chemistry does not perturb temperature there.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: the small-correction conclusion is conditional on which metals are gaseous; the network omits Fe, Mg, Al, Na, and K species, so at metallicities where those metal oxides become significant visible absorbers, the TiO exception could become a class of exceptions.
  • Editorial extension: the N2/O2 result implies that trace photochemical products (nitrogen oxides) can set the opacity and reshape the thermal profile of an otherwise infrared-transparent atmosphere, which matters for climate and habitability assessments of rocky exoplanets around UV-active M dwarfs.
  • Editorial extension: the model predicts a sharp TiO abundance drop near 1 mbar in hot Jupiters, a vertical gradient that high-resolution visible spectroscopy of transmission or dayside spectra could directly test against condensation or horizontal-transport explanations.
  • Editorial extension: the intermediate-time temperature updating scheme could be carried into 3D circulation models, where dayside–nightside compositional asymmetry and chemical heating from H2 dissociation or CO↔CH4 conversion might produce larger feedback than the vertical 1D result.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper presents PACT, a new 1D model coupling radiative-convective temperature structure with disequilibrium chemistry (thermochemical kinetics, photochemistry, and vertical mixing) for exoplanet atmospheres. The reaction network contains 164 neutral species and 2352 forward reactions, with rate coefficients and UV cross sections assigned to explicit uncertainty categories. The radiative-convective module is benchmarked against ATMO, HELIOS, and petitCODE for gray atmospheres. The model is applied to five gas giants (WASP-33b, HD 209458b, HD 189733b, GJ 436b, GJ 1214b) and to five idealized secondary atmospheres. The central finding is that for irradiated gas giants with solar or supersolar metallicity, disequilibrium chemistry changes temperatures by at most about 100 K, except that photodestruction of TiO in hot Jupiters can induce larger changes (~300 K cooling in HD 209458b and ~150 K warming in HD 189733b). For secondary atmospheres, H2O- and CO2-dominated cases are thermally robust, whereas CH4- and O2-dominated cases are seriously affected. The authors acknowledge explicitly that the TiO photodissociation cross section is an educated guess and that photoionization may compete.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper gives a practically useful rule: for most irradiated gas giants, retrievals that assume chemical equilibrium temperature structures are safe, while TiO-bearing hot Jupiters and CH4- or O2-dominated secondary atmospheres require coupled chemistry-temperature modeling. The study is strengthened by its public code (PACT and ACE), the benchmarking of the radiative-convective module against established codes, the large and carefully documented reaction network, and the authors' transparent uncertainty categories for rate coefficients and cross sections. The main significance caveat is that the single largest quantitative effect, the TiO-driven temperature change, rests on an admittedly guessed photodissociation cross section; no sensitivity analysis is provided to show how this effect responds to plausible variations, so the robustness of the headline exception is not yet established.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sect. 5; Sect. 2.1.2; Table A.1] The >100 K temperature exception attributed to TiO photodestruction in HD 209458b and HD 189733b (Sect. 4) is the only quantitative counterexample to the paper's headline claim that disequilibrium corrections are at most about 100 K for irradiated gas giants. That exception is driven entirely by the adopted TiO photodissociation cross section of 1 Mb over 100-250 nm (Sect. 2.1.2; Table A.1, reference 55), which the manuscript classifies as category C (>10x uncertainty) and, in Sect. 5, describes as "just an educated guess", noting that photoionization probably competes or dominates. Because a plausible reduction, spectral shift, or ionization channel for this cross section could reduce TiO depletion and bring the temperature change below 100 K, the robustness of the central claim is not established. Please add a sensitivity study that varies the TiO photodissociation cross section within the category-C range (for example 0.1, 1, and 10 Mb, plus a red-shifted or ionization-only case) and report the resulting steady-state temperature profiles and maximum differences for HD 209458b and HD 189733b. If the >100 K effect is not robust across this range, the abstract and conclusions should be revised accordingly.
  2. [Sect. 2.1.1-2.1.2; Sect. 6; Fig. 4] The conclusions for secondary atmospheres dominated by CH4 and O2 (Sect. 6, Fig. 4) rest on a reaction network and UV cross-section set in which many key processes are category-C estimates, including photolysis of hydrocarbons and the nitrogen-oxide interconversion pathways. The paper presents these results as qualitative ("seriously affected"), but the magnitude of the temperature changes shown in Fig. 4 depends on these guessed inputs. To support the generality of the claim, please include at least two bounding calculations (for example, scaling all category-C rate coefficients and cross sections by factors of 0.1 and 10, or targeted variations of the reactions that dominate CH4 processing and NO/NO2 production) and show that the qualitative conclusion is unchanged.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sect. 3] The text "GJ 12143b" should read "GJ 1214b".
  2. [Sect. 2.1.2] The text "1 Mb is equal to 10−18 cm−2" has the wrong units; it should be "10−18 cm2".
  3. [Sect. 3] The citation "(Chakrabarty & Sengupta 1999)" for the equilibrium temperature of WASP-33b appears to be a typo; the reference list gives Chakrabarty & Sengupta (2019).
  4. [Sect. 4] The statement "the only molecule responsible for the temperature modification seen in Fig. 2 is TiO" should be qualified to HD 209458b, since the following paragraph for HD 189733b also identifies atomic Ti as an important visible absorber.
  5. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption defines solid and dotted lines, but the line styles are not shown in the figure legend; adding a legend or explicit line-style labels would improve readability.
  6. [Abstract and Sect. 6] The phrase "on the order of 100 K at most" sits in some tension with the reported ~300 K and ~150 K changes for HD 209458b and HD 189733b; consider phrasing the main claim as "at most about 100 K, with the exception of TiO photodestruction" to avoid misreading.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the temperature and composition outputs are emergent model results, not fitted quantities; the TiO caveat is an input-uncertainty limitation rather than a self-referential reduction.

full rationale

The derivation chain (continuity-transport equation, thermal-energy equation, radiative transfer, and the coupled chemistry module) is solved forward using rate coefficients and cross sections compiled from the literature; no term is fitted to the paper's target claims about ≤100 K corrections or about TiO-driven changes. The temperature corrections are differences between a self-consistent steady-state run and an initial chemical-equilibrium run (Figs. 2 and 4), so they are emergent by construction and not defined by the claims. The radiative-convective module is benchmarked against the independent codes ATMO, HELIOS, and petitCODE (Fig. 1, Sect. 2.3). The gas-giant agreement claim is supported by Drummond et al. (2016) and Mukherjee et al. (2023, 2024), not only by the author's earlier GJ 436b iteration (Agúndez et al. 2014a); self-citations for code heritage (Agúndez et al. 2014b) and reaction-rate sources are not used as a uniqueness constraint or as proof of the central result. The one genuinely load-bearing uncertainty is the TiO photodissociation cross section, explicitly labelled in Sect. 2.1.2 and Table A.1 (ref. 55) as a category-C 1 Mb guess, with Sect. 5 stating that the cross section is 'just an educated guess' and that photoionization probably competes or dominates. That is an input-assumption sensitivity, not circularity, because varying the input changes the prediction rather than reproducing it by definition. No equation reduces to a fitted parameter, no prior result by the same author is invoked to forbid alternatives, and no known result is merely renamed. I therefore find no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model introduces no new particles, forces, dimensions, or conserved quantities. It uses existing chemical species and standard physics. The free-parameter burden is moderate: the most consequential hand-chosen inputs are the eddy diffusion profile, the heat redistribution factors, the internal temperature, the guessed TiO photodissociation cross section, and the simplified initial compositions of secondary atmospheres. The largest risk is the TiO cross-section guess, which the author explicitly flags.

free parameters (5)
  • Kzz eddy diffusion coefficient = 5e8 * p^{-0.5} * (H1/620) * (Teff/1450)^4 cm2/s (Eq. 9)
    Adopted from Moses et al. (2022), not fitted here, but it sets quench levels and therefore the disequilibrium abundances and the temperature response.
  • Heat redistribution factor f_i = 1.0 for WASP-33b, 0.5 for the other four gas giants
    Chosen per planet from phase-curve evidence; directly controls the dayside insolation and the overall temperature scale.
  • Internal temperature T_int = 300 K for the five gas giants, 50 K for the secondary atmospheres
    Round values chosen from literature estimates; affects deep atmospheric temperature and convective mixing strength.
  • TiO photodissociation cross section = Guessed, type C, about 1 Mb over 100-250 nm
    Not measured; the headline temperature effect greater than 100 K in hot Jupiters depends on this guess, as the author acknowledges.
  • Initial composition of secondary atmospheres = Equal mixing ratios of the initial gases (e.g., 1:1 for CO2:N2)
    Simplified starting point chosen for plausibility; the temperature evolution depends on these initial mixtures.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The 1D vertical column represents the dayside and horizontal heat redistribution is parameterized by f_i.
    The model focuses on the dayside with a fixed zenith angle; horizontal circulation effects on the composition-temperature coupling are discussed only qualitatively in Sect. 5.
  • domain assumption Only neutral gaseous species are included; ions, clouds, and hazes are neglected.
    Stated as a limitation in Sect. 2.1; the author notes clouds and hazes can affect the temperature by hundreds of K, citing Lavvas and Arfaux (2021).
  • domain assumption The 164-species, 2352-reaction network is complete enough for the modeled atmospheres.
    The network is built from scratch; completeness is not proven and many rate coefficients are category-C estimates, which injects unquantified uncertainty.
  • standard math Reverse rate coefficients are computed by detailed balance using NASA polynomial thermochemical data.
    This is a standard procedure, but the accuracy depends on the thermochemical data, and the paper notes extrapolations can be wrong by orders of magnitude.
  • ad hoc to paper The TiO photodissociation cross section is assumed to be about 1 Mb over 100-250 nm.
    The author states this is an educated guess and that photoionization may dominate; this assumption drives the largest reported temperature effect.
  • ad hoc to paper Empirical formulas (Eq. 6, termolecular upper limits, collision efficiencies) fill missing kinetics data.
    These formulas are fitted to subsets of known reactions and may introduce systematic errors for the hundreds of reactions to which they are applied.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The mutual influence of disequilibrium composition and temperature in exoplanet atmospheres." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DXAEOGRW

@misc{pith2026250611658,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The mutual influence of disequilibrium composition and temperature in exoplanet atmospheres},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DXAEOGRW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.11658}
}
read the original abstract

We have developed a 1D planetary atmosphere model that solves in a self-consistent manner the evolution of temperature and disequilibrium chemistry in the vertical direction. Thermochemical kinetics is based on a reaction network built from scratch that includes 164 gaseous species composed of H, C, N, O, S, Si, P, Ti, He, and Ar, connected by 2352 forward reactions. The model is applied to the well-known gas giant exoplanets WASP-33b, HD209458b, HD189733b, GJ436b, and GJ1214b, and to secondary atmospheres that exoplanets characterized in the future may plausibly have. For irradiated gas giants with solar or supersolar metallicity, the corrections to the temperature due to disequilibrium chemistry are relatively small, on the order of 100 K at most, in agreement with previous studies. Although the atmospheric composition of some of these planets deviates significantly from chemical equilibrium, the impact on the temperature is moderate because the abundances of the main atmospheric species that provide opacity, such as H2O, CO2, CO, and/or CH4, are not seriously modified by disequilibrium chemistry. An impact on the temperature greater than 100 K appears in hot Jupiters due to TiO, which is predicted to be seriously depleted by UV photons in the upper layers. However, the extent of this depletion, and thus of its impact on the temperature, is uncertain due to the lack of knowledge about TiO photodestruction. In secondary atmospheres, the impact of disequilibrium chemistry on the temperature depends on the composition. In atmospheres dominated by H2O and/or CO2 the temperature is not affected to an important extent. However, reducing atmospheres dominated by CH4 and oxidizing atmospheres dominated by O2 see their temperature being seriously affected due to the important processing of the atmospheric composition induced by disequilibrium chemistry.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.11658 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Pressure-temperature profiles calculated with our radiative-convective module with and without the source function (S ν) technique (see text) are compared to those obtained with other codes in the literature: ATMO (Tremblin et al. 2015), HELIOS (Malik et al. 2017, 2019), and petitCODE (Mollière et al. 2015, 2017). We consider two cases with parameters typical of HD 209458b. The first one is a non-irradiated gray atm… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Dayside pressure-temperature profiles calculated for the gas gi￾ant exoplanets WASP-33b, HD 209458b, HD 189733b, GJ 436b, and GJ 1214b. The solid lines correspond to the temperature profiles cal￾culated self-consistently with the disequilibrium composition at a time at which a steady state is reached in the atmosphere composition and temperature, while the dotted lines correspond to temperature profiles calculated a… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Calculated dayside composition in five gas giants and three plausible secondary atmospheres (hot volcano-like, hot reducing N2/CH4, and warm oxidizing N2/O2 atmosphere). Dotted lines correspond to the initial composition (chemical equilibrium for the gas giants and equal uniform abundances for secondary atmospheres), dashed lines to a calculation where the initial temperature does not further evolve (only for the ga… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Dayside pressure-temperature profiles calculated for five exo￾planets with plausible secondary atmospheres (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Abeysekera, C., Joalland, B., Ariyasingha, N., et al. 2015, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 6, 1599

    2015

  2. [2]

    1994, Can

    Abgrall, H., Roueff, E., Launay, F., & Roncin, J.-Y . 1994, Can. J. Phys., 72, 856

    1994

  3. [3]

    U., & Glarborg, P

    Abian, M., Alzueta, M. U., & Glarborg, P. 2015, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 47, 518

    2015

  4. [4]

    Ackerman, A. S. & Marley, M. S. 2001, ApJ, 556, 872

    2001

  5. [5]

    Adachi, H., Basco, N., & James, D. G. L. 1981, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 13, 1251

    1981

  6. [6]

    & Wagner, H

    Aders, W.-K. & Wagner, H. Gg. 1973, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem., 77, 712

    1973

  7. [7]

    Adusei, G. Y . & Fontijn, A. 1993, J. Phys. Chem., 97, 1406

    1993

  8. [8]

    Adusei, G. Y . & Fontijn, A. 1994, J. Phys. Chem., 98, 3732

    1994

Show all 300 references
  1. [9]

    Y ., Blue, A

    Adusei, G. Y ., Blue, A. S., & Fontijn, A. 1996, J. Phys. Chem., 100, 16921 Agúndez, M. & Cernicharo, J. 2006, ApJ, 650, 374 Agúndez, M., Cernicharo, J., & Guélin, M. 2007, ApJ, 662, L91 Agúndez, M., Venot, O., Iro, N., et al. 2012, A&A, 548, A73 Agúndez, M., Venot, O., Selsis...

    1996

  2. [10]

    A., Ren, Z., & da Silva, G

    Alam, M. A., Ren, Z., & da Silva, G. 2019, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 51, 723

    2019

  3. [11]

    Alarcon, J. F. & Mebel, A. M. 2022, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 54, 203

    2022

  4. [12]

    Albadalejo, J., Jiménez, E., Notario, A., et al. 2002, J. Phys. Chem. A, 106, 2512

    2002

  5. [13]

    R., Alam, M

    Alderson, L., Wakeford, H. R., Alam, M. K., et al. 2023, Nature, 614, 664

    2023

  6. [14]

    N., Bedeneev, V

    Aleksandrov, E. N., Bedeneev, V . I., Kozlov, S. N., & Pryakhin, G. A. 1989, Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR Div. Chem. Sci., 38, 674

    1989

  7. [15]

    N., Bedeneev, V

    Aleksandrov, E. N., Bedeneev, V . I., Kozlov, S. N., & Pryakhin, G. A. 1989, Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR Div. Chem. Sci., 37, 2170

    1989

  8. [16]

    N., Basevich, V

    Aleksandrov, E. N., Basevich, V . Y ., & Vedeneev, V . I. 1994, Khim. Fiz., 13, 90

    1994

  9. [17]

    Ali, M. A. & Barker, J. R. 2015, J. Phys. Chem. A, 119, 7578

    2015

  10. [18]

    A., Sonk, J

    Ali, M. A., Sonk, J. A., & Barker, J. R. 2016, J. Phys. Chem. A, 120, 7060

    2016

  11. [19]

    F., Changeat, Q., Waldmann, I

    Al-Refaie, A. F., Changeat, Q., Waldmann, I. P., & Tinetti, G., 2021, ApJ, 917, 37

    2021

  12. [20]

    F., Venot, O., Changeat, Q., & Edwards, B

    Al-Refaie, A. F., Venot, O., Changeat, Q., & Edwards, B. 2024, ApJ, 967, 132

    2024

  13. [21]

    & McDonald, R

    Altinay, G. & McDonald, R. G. 2015, J. Phys. Chem. A, 119, 7593

    2015

  14. [22]

    U., Glarborg, P., & Dam-Johansen, K

    Alzueta, M. U., Glarborg, P., & Dam-Johansen, K. 2000, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 32, 498

    2000

  15. [23]

    U., Guerrero, M., Millera, Á., et al

    Alzueta, M. U., Guerrero, M., Millera, Á., et al. 2021, Proc. Comb. Inst., 38, 575

    2021

  16. [24]

    S., Baraffe, I., Tremblin, P., et al

    Amundsen, D. S., Baraffe, I., Tremblin, P., et al. 2014, A&A, 564, A59

    2014

  17. [25]

    S., Tremblin, P., Manners, J., et al

    Amundsen, D. S., Tremblin, P., Manners, J., et al. 2017, A&A, 598, A97

    2017

  18. [26]

    & Hancock, D

    Anastasi, C. & Hancock, D. U. 1984, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans., 80, 935

    1984

  19. [27]

    & Hancock, D

    Anastasi, C. & Hancock, D. U. 1988, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 2, 84, 1697

    1988

  20. [28]

    Anastasi, C., Simpson, V ., Munk, J., & Pagsberg, P. 1990, J. Phys. Chem., 94, 6327

    1990

  21. [29]

    T., Hass, S

    Andersen, S. T., Hass, S. A., Frederickson, L., B., & Nielsen, O. J. 2018, J. Phys. Chem. A, 122, 5983

    2018

  22. [30]

    Anglada, J. M. 2004, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 126, 9809

    2004

  23. [31]

    M., Crehuet, R., Adhikari, S., et al

    Anglada, J. M., Crehuet, R., Adhikari, S., et al. 2018, PCCP, 20, 4793

    2018

  24. [32]

    1981, Radiat

    Arai, H., Nagai, S., & Hatada, M. 1981, Radiat. Phys. Chem., 17, 211

    1981

  25. [33]

    Arathala, P., Katz, M., & Musah, R. A. 2020, PCCP, 22, 10027

    2020

  26. [34]

    & Arthur, N

    Arican, H. & Arthur, N. L. 1983, Aust. J. Chem., 36, 2195

    1983

  27. [35]

    Armitage, J. W. & Cullis, C. F. 1971, Comb. Flame, 16, 125

    1971

  28. [36]

    Arthur, N. L. & Bell, T. N. 1978, Rev. Chem. Interm., 2, 37

    1978

  29. [37]

    Arthur, N. L. 1986, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 2, 82, 331

    1986

  30. [38]

    Arthur, N. L. & Miles, L. A. 1997, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans., 93, 4259 Article number, page 13 of 29 A&A proofs: manuscript no. pact

    1997

  31. [39]

    Arthur, N. L. & Cooper, I. A. 1997, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans., 93, 521

    1997

  32. [40]

    & Fujii, N

    Asaba, T. & Fujii, N. 1971, Proc. Int. Symp. Shock Tubes Waves, 8, 1

    1971

  33. [41]

    & Vahedpour, M

    Asgharzadeh, S. & Vahedpour, M. 2018, Chem. Phys. Lett., 702, 57

    2018

  34. [42]

    Ashmore, P. G. & Burnett, M. G. 1962, Trans. Faraday Soc., 58, 253

    1962

  35. [43]

    J., & Scott, P

    Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 481

    2009

  36. [44]

    2018, PCCP, 20, 10660

    Assaf, E., Schoemaecker, C., Vereecken, L., & Fittschen, C. 2018, PCCP, 20, 10660

    2018

  37. [45]

    1992, Symp

    Atakan, B., Kocis, D., & Wolfrum, J. 1992, Symp. (Int.) Comb., 24, 691

    1992

  38. [46]

    J., & Pitts Jr., J

    Atkinson, R., Finlayson, B. J., & Pitts Jr., J. N. 1973, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 95, 7592

    1973

  39. [47]

    L., Cox, R

    Atkinson, R., Baulch, D. L., Cox, R. A., et al. 1989, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 21, 115

    1989

  40. [48]

    L., Cox, R

    Atkinson, R., Baulch, D. L., Cox, R. A., et al. 1997, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 26, 1329

    1997

  41. [49]

    L., Cox, R

    Atkinson, R., Baulch, D. L., Cox, R. A., et al. 2004, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 1461

    2004

  42. [50]

    L., Cox, R

    Atkinson, R., Baulch, D. L., Cox, R. A., et al. 2006, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3625

    2006

  43. [51]

    W., Cooper, G., Burton, G

    Au, J. W., Cooper, G., Burton, G. R., et al. 1993, Chem. Phys., 173, 209

    1993

  44. [52]

    Au, J. W. & Brion, C. E. 1997, Chem. Phys., 218, 109

    1997

  45. [53]

    Bacskay, G. B. & Mackie, J. C. 2001, PCCP, 3, 2467

    2001

  46. [54]

    F., & Farooq, A

    Badra, J., Nasir, E. F., & Farooq, A. 2014, J. Phys. Chem. A, 118, 4652

    2014

  47. [55]

    2021, MNRAS, 505, 5603

    Baeyens, R., Decin, L., Carone, L., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 505, 5603

    2021

  48. [56]

    2022, MNRAS, 512, 4877

    Baeyens, R., Konings, T., Venot, O., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 512, 4877

    2022

  49. [57]

    E., Frey, H

    Baggott, J. E., Frey, H. M., Lightfoot, P. D., & Walsh, R. 1987, J. Phys. Chem., 91, 3386

    1987

  50. [58]

    A., Biggs, P., Canosa-Mas, C., et al

    Bagley, J. A., Biggs, P., Canosa-Mas, C., et al. 1990, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans., 86, 2109

    1990

  51. [59]

    2021, Comb

    Bai, J., Zhou, C.-W., & Yang, L. 2021, Comb. Flame, 232, 111502

    2021

  52. [60]

    A., Ranjan, S., et al

    Bains, W., Pasek, M. A., Ranjan, S., et al. 2023, ACS Earth Space Chem., 7, 1219

    2023

  53. [61]

    & Shaw, R

    Baker, G. & Shaw, R. 1965, J. Chem. Soc., 6965

    1965

  54. [62]

    Baklanov, A. V . & Krasnoperov, L. N. 2001, J. Phys. Chem. A, 105, 4917

    2001

  55. [63]

    Ballester, M. Y . & Varandas, A. J. C. 2008, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 40, 527

    2008

  56. [64]

    Ballester, M. Y . & Varandas, A. J. C. 2009, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 41, 449

    2009

  57. [65]

    2015, Chem

    Balucani, N., Leonori, F., Petrucci, R., et al. 2015, Chem. Phys., 449, 34

    2015

  58. [66]

    & de Almeida, A

    Baptista, L. & de Almeida, A. A. 2023, J. Phys. Chem. A, 127, 1000

    2023

  59. [67]

    J., Strange, J

    Barber, R. J., Strange, J. K., Hill, C., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 437, 1828

    2014

  60. [68]

    1991, Symp

    Bartels, M., Edelbüttel-Einhaus, J., & Hoyermann, K. 1991, Symp. (Int.) Comb., 23, 131

    1991

  61. [69]

    2020, PCCP, 22, 4699

    Baroncelli, M., Mao, Q., Galle, S., et al. 2020, PCCP, 22, 4699

    2020

  62. [70]

    Basevich, V . Ya. & Vedeneev, V . I. 1988, Khim. Fiz., 7, 1552

    1988

  63. [71]

    Basu, S. C. & Husain, D. 1988, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A, 42, 1

    1988

  64. [72]

    2011, Theor

    Batiha, M., Altarawneh, M., Alsofi, A., et al. 2011, Theor. Chem. Acc., 129, 823

    2011

  65. [73]

    2017, ApJ, 850, 150

    Baudino, J.-L., Mollière, P., Venot, O., et al. 2017, ApJ, 850, 150

    2017

  66. [74]

    H., Jeffers, P., Lifshitz, A., & Yadava, B

    Bauer, S. H., Jeffers, P., Lifshitz, A., & Yadava, B. P. 1971, Symp. (Int.) Comb., 13, 417

    1971

  67. [75]

    Bauer, S. J. 1973, Physics of Planetary Ionospheres (Berlin: Springer-Verlag)

    1973

  68. [76]

    H., & Meuser, R

    Bauer, W., Becker, K. H., & Meuser, R. 1985, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem., 89, 340

    1985

  69. [77]

    L., Cobos, C

    Baulch, D. L., Cobos, C. J., Cox, R. A., et al. 1992, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 21, 411

    1992

  70. [78]

    L., Cobos, C

    Baulch, D. L., Cobos, C. J., Cox, R. A., et al. 1994, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 23, 847

    1994

  71. [79]

    L., Bowman, C

    Baulch, D. L., Bowman, C. T., Cobos, C. J., et al. 2005, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 34, 757

    2005

  72. [80]

    2021, A&A, 648, A127 Bayratçeken, F., Telayar, Z., Arı, F., et al

    Baxter, C., Désert, J.-M., Tsai, S.-M., et al. 2021, A&A, 648, A127 Bayratçeken, F., Telayar, Z., Arı, F., et al. 2006, Spectrochim. Acta A: Mol. Biomol. Spectr., 65, 143

    2021

  73. [81]

    G., Welbanks, L., Schlawin, E., et al

    Beatty, T. G., Welbanks, L., Schlawin, E., et al. 2024, ApJ, 970, L10

    2024

  74. [82]

    H., Engelhardt, B., Geiger, H., et al

    Becker, K. H., Engelhardt, B., Geiger, H., et al. 1993, Chem. Phys. Lett., 210, 135

    1993

  75. [83]

    H., Kurtenbach, R., Schmidt, F., & Wiesen, P

    Becker, K. H., Kurtenbach, R., Schmidt, F., & Wiesen, P. 1995, Chem. Phys. Lett., 235, 230

    1995

  76. [84]

    H., Kurtenbach, R., Schmidt, F., & Wiesen, P

    Becker, K. H., Kurtenbach, R., Schmidt, F., & Wiesen, P. 1997, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem., 101, 128

    1997

  77. [85]

    H., Geiger, H., Schmidt, F., & Wiesen, P

    Becker, K. H., Geiger, H., Schmidt, F., & Wiesen, P. 1999, PCCP, 1, 5305

    1999

  78. [86]

    H., Kurtenbach, R., Schmidt, F., & Wiesen, P

    Becker, K. H., Kurtenbach, R., Schmidt, F., & Wiesen, P. 2000, Comb. Flame, 120, 570

    2000

  79. [87]

    & Morin, J

    Bedjanian, Y . & Morin, J. 2017, J. Phys. Chem. A, 121, 1553

    2017

  80. [88]

    Bedjanian, Y . 2022, J. Phys. Chem. A, 126, 4080

    2022

  81. [89]

    R., France, K., Brown, A., et al

    Behr, P. R., France, K., Brown, A., et al. 2023, AJ, 166, 35

    2023

  82. [90]

    Bell, T. J. & Cowan, N. B. 2018, ApJ, 857, L20

    2018

  83. [91]

    J., Crouzet, N., Cubillos, P

    Bell, T. J., Crouzet, N., Cubillos, P. E., et al. 2024, Nature Astron., 8, 879

    2024

  84. [92]

    A., et al

    Bello-Arufe, A., Damiano, M., Bennett, K. A., et al. 2025, ApJ, 980, L26

    2025

  85. [93]

    Benson, S. W. 1994, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 26, 997

    1994

  86. [94]

    R., Hippler, H., et al

    Bentz, T., Giri, B. R., Hippler, H., et al. 2007, J. Phys. Chem. A, 111, 3812

    2007

  87. [95]

    E., Safarik, I., Strausz, O

    Berkley, R. E., Safarik, I., Strausz, O. P., & Gunning, H. E. 1973, J. Phys. Chem., 77, 1741

    1973

  88. [96]

    Bergeat, A., Calvo, T., Dorthe, G., & Loison, J.-C. 1999, J. Phys. Chem., 103, 6360

    1999

  89. [97]

    & Loison, J.-C

    Bergeat, A. & Loison, J.-C. 2001, PCCP, 3, 2038 Berteloite, c., Le Picard, S. D., Birza, P., et al. 2008, Icarus, 194, 746

    2001

  90. [98]

    M., Daugey, N., et al

    Bergeat, A., Hickson, K. M., Daugey, N., et al. 2009, PCCP, 11, 8149

    2009

  91. [99]

    Bernath, P. 2020, J. Quant. Spectr. Radiat. Transfer, 240, 106687

    2020

  92. [100]

    & Black, R

    Betts, J. & Black, R. A. 1965, Can. J. Phys., 43, 2678

    1965

  93. [101]

    2019, Int

    Bian, H., Xu, B., Zhang, H., et al. 2019, Int. J. Quantum Chem., 119, e25822

    2019

  94. [102]

    Biehl, H., & Stuhl, F. 1991, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem., 59, 135

    1991

  95. [103]

    E., Fracheboud, J.-M., et al

    Biggs, P., Canosa-Mas, C. E., Fracheboud, J.-M., et al. 1994, J. Chem. Soc. Fara- day Trans., 90, 1197

    1994

  96. [104]

    E., Fracheboud, J.-M., et al

    Biggs, P., Canosa-Mas, C. E., Fracheboud, J.-M., et al. 1995, J. Chem. Soc. Fara- day Trans., 91, 817

    1995

  97. [105]

    N., Smith, R

    Birrell, R. N., Smith, R. F., Trotman-Dickenson, A. F., & Wilkie, H. 1957, J. Chem. Soc., 2807 Blázquez, S., González, D., Neeman, E. M., et al. 2020, PCCP, 22, 20562

    1957

  98. [106]

    A., McKee, K

    Blitz, M. A., McKee, K. W., & Pilling, M. J. 2000, Symp. (Int.) Comb., 28, 2491

    2000

  99. [107]

    A., Hughes, K

    Blitz, M. A., Hughes, K. J., & Pilling, M. J. 2003, J. Phys. Chem. A, 107, 1971

    2003

  100. [108]

    A., Dillon, T

    Blitz, M. A., Dillon, T. J., Heard, D. E., et al. 2004, PCCP, 6, 2162

    2004

  101. [109]

    A., Hughes, K

    Blitz, M. A., Hughes, K. J., Pilling, M. J., & Robertson, S. H. 2006, J. Phys. Chem. A, 110, 2996

    2006

  102. [110]

    A., Shannon, R

    Blitz, M. A., Shannon, R. J., Marshall, P., & Pilling, M. J. 2010, Z. Phys. Chem., 224, 1009

    2010

  103. [111]

    A., Kappler, C., Pilling, M

    Blitz, M. A., Kappler, C., Pilling, M. J., & Seakins, P. W. 2011, Z. Phys. Chem., 225, 957

    2011

  104. [112]

    A., Talbi, D., Seakins, P

    Blitz, M. A., Talbi, D., Seakins, P. W., & Smith, I. W. M. 2012, J. Phys. Chem. A, 116, 5877

    2012

  105. [113]

    D., Mandell, A

    Blumenthal, S. D., Mandell, A. M., Hébrard, E., et al. 2018, ApJ, 853, 138

    2018

  106. [114]

    B., Rowe, B

    Bocherel, P., Herbert, L. B., Rowe, B. R., et al. 1996, J. Phys. Chem., 1996, 100, 3063

    1996

  107. [115]

    M., Rocco, M

    Boechat-Roberty, H. M., Rocco, M. L. M., Lucas, C. A., & de Souza, G. G. B. 2004, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys., 37, 1467

    2004

  108. [116]

    A., Baklanov, A

    Bogdanchikov, G. A., Baklanov, A. V ., & Parker, D. H. 2004, Chem. Phys. Lett., 385, 486 Böhland, T., Dóbé, S., Temps, F., & Wagner, H. Gg. 1985, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem., 89, 1110

    2004

  109. [117]

    Bohland, T., Temps, F., & Wagner, H. Gg. 1988, Symp. (Int.) Comb., 21, 841

    1988

  110. [118]

    B., Hall, I

    Boodaghians, R. B., Hall, I. W., Toby, F. S., & Wayne, R. P. 1987, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 2, 83, 2073

    1987

  111. [119]

    R., Brobst, W

    Bosco, S. R., Brobst, W. D., Nava, D. F., & Stief, L. J. 1983, J. Geophys. Res., 88, 8543

    1983

  112. [120]

    W., Kristyan, S., & lin, M

    Boughton, J. W., Kristyan, S., & lin, M. C. 1997, Chem. Phys., 214, 219

    1997

  113. [121]

    R., & Wilson, K

    Bouwman, J., Goulay, F., Leone, S. R., & Wilson, K. R. 2012, J. Phys. Chem. A, 116, 3907

    2012

  114. [122]

    R., et al

    Bouwman, J., Fournier, M., Sims, I. R., et al. 2013, J. Phys. Chem. A, 117, 5093

    2013

  115. [123]

    Bourgalais, J., Capron, M., Kailasanathan, R. K. A., et al. 2015, ApJ, 812, 106

    2015

  116. [124]

    L., Durif, O., et al

    Bourgalais, J., Caster, K. L., Durif, O., et al. 2019, J. Phys. Chem. A, 123, 2178

    2019

  117. [125]

    2020, ApJ, 895, 77

    Bourgalais, J., Carrasco, N., Changeat, Q., et al. 2020, ApJ, 895, 77

    2020

  118. [126]

    2019, MNRAS, 489, 4890

    Boulangier, J., Gobrecht, D., Decin, L., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 489, 4890

    2019

  119. [127]

    Boulanouar, M., Mouna, C., Rayenne, D., & Addine, K. D. 2023, Turkish Comp. Theor. Chem., 7, 1

    2023

  120. [128]

    C., Burke, A

    Bowman, M. C., Burke, A. D., Turney, J. M., & Schaefer III, H. F. 2018, J. Phys. Chem. A, 122, 9498

    2018

  121. [129]

    C., Burke, A

    Bowman, M. C., Burke, A. D., Turney, J. M., & Schaefer III, H. F. 2020, Mol. Phys., 118, 1769214

    2020

  122. [130]

    A., et al

    Boyajian, T., von Braun, K., Feiden, G. A., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 447, 846

    2015

  123. [131]

    Bozzelli, J. W. & Dean, A. M. 1990, J. Phys. Chem., 94, 3313

    1990

  124. [132]

    Bozzelli, J. W. & Dean, A. M. 1995, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 27, 1097

    1995

  125. [133]

    P., Yurchenko, S

    Brady, R. P., Yurchenko, S. N., Tennyson, J., & Kim, G.-S. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 6675

    2024

  126. [134]

    R., & Bass, A

    Braun, W., McNesby, J. R., & Bass, A. M. 1967, J. Chem. Phys., 46, 2071 Bravo-Pérez, G., Alvarez-Idaboy, J. R., Cruz-Torres, A., & Ruiz, Ma. E. 2002, J. Phys. Chem. A, 106, 4645

    1967

  127. [135]

    Brown, R. L. 1973, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 5, 663

    1973

  128. [136]

    J., Beunker, R

    Bruna, P. J., Beunker, R. J., & Peyerimhoff, S. D. 1976, J. Mol. Struct., 32, 217

    1976

  129. [137]

    & Liuti, G

    Brunetti, B. & Liuti, G. 1975, Z. Phys. Chem., 94, 19

    1975

  130. [138]

    H., Schwab, J

    Brune, Wm. H., Schwab, J. J., & Anderson, J. G. 1983, J. Phys. Chem., 87, 4503

    1983

  131. [139]

    Brudnik, K., Wójcik-Pastuszka, D., & Jodkowski, J. T. 2009, Polish J. Chem., 83, 1203

    2009

  132. [140]

    G., Kacharov, A

    Bryukov, M. G., Kacharov, A. A., Timonnen, R., et al. 1993, Chem. Phys. Lett., 208, 392

    1993

  133. [141]

    Buchan, N. I. & Jasinski, J. M. 1990, J. Crystal Growth, 106, 227

    1990

  134. [142]

    Buchta, Chr., Stucken, D.-V ., V ollmer, J.-T., & Wagner, H. Gg. 1994, Z. Phys. Chem., 185, 153 Article number, page 14 of 29 Agúndez: The mutual influence of disequilibrium composition and temperature in exoplanet atmospheres

    1994

  135. [143]

    & Roscoe, J

    Budge, S. & Roscoe, J. M. 1995, Can. J. Chem., 73, 666

    1995

  136. [144]

    D., Dilday, B

    Buettner, A. D., Dilday, B. J., Craigmile, R. A., et al. 2020, PCCP, 22, 24583

    2020

  137. [145]

    2021, A&A, 646, A5

    Bulut, N., Roncero, O., Aguado, A., et al. 2021, A&A, 646, A5

    2021

  138. [146]

    Bunkan, A. J. C., Tang, Y ., Sellevåg, S. R., & Nielsen, C. J. 2004, J. Phys. Chem. A, 118, 5279

    2004

  139. [147]

    J., Chu, T.-C., Jamal, A., et al

    Buras, Z. J., Chu, T.-C., Jamal, A., et al. 2018, PCCP, 20, 13191

    2018

  140. [148]

    B., Sander, S

    Burkholder, J. B., Sander, S. P. J., Abbatt, J. R., et al. 2015, JPL Publication 15-10

    2015

  141. [149]

    B., Sander, S

    Burkholder, J. B., Sander, S. P., Abbatt, J. P. D., et al. 2020, JPL Publication 19-5

    2020

  142. [150]

    R., Chan, W

    Burton, G. R., Chan, W. F., Cooper, G., & Brion, C. E. 1993, Chem. Phys., 177, 217

    1993

  143. [151]

    E., Fleming, J

    Butler, J. E., Fleming, J. W., Goss, L. P., & Lin, M. C. 1981, Chem. Phys., 56, 355

    1981

  144. [152]

    I., Kukui, A., Pouvesle, N., & Le Bras, G

    Butkovskaya, N. I., Kukui, A., Pouvesle, N., & Le Bras, G. 2005, J. Phys. Chem. A, 109, 6509

    2005

  145. [153]

    J., & Crowley, J

    Cameron, M., Sivakumaran, V ., Dillon, T. J., & Crowley, J. N. 2002, PCCP, 4, 3628

    2002

  146. [154]

    Campbell, I. M. & Gray, C. N. 1973, Chem. Phys. Lett., 18, 607

    1973

  147. [155]

    Campbell, M. L. & McLean, R. E. 1993, J. Phys. Chem., 97, 7942

    1993

  148. [156]

    Campomanes, P., Menéndez, I., & Sordo, T. L. 2001, J. Phys. Chem. A, 105, 229

    2001

  149. [157]

    R., Mendoza, E., Silva, M

    Campanha, D. R., Mendoza, E., Silva, M. X., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 515, 369

    2022

  150. [158]

    J., Toby, S., & Wayne, R

    Canosa-Mas, C., Smith, S. J., Toby, S., & Wayne, R. P. 1988, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 2, 84, 263

    1988

  151. [159]

    E., Smith, S

    Canosa-Mas, C. E., Smith, S. J., Waygood, S. J., & Wayne, R. P. 1991, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans., 87, 3473

    1991

  152. [160]

    R., Travers, D., et al

    Canosa, A., Sims, I. R., Travers, D., et al. 1997, A&A, 323, 644

    1997

  153. [161]

    D., Gougeon, S., et al

    Canosa, A., Le Picard, S. D., Gougeon, S., et al. 2001, J. Chem. Phys., 115, 6495

    2001

  154. [162]

    H., Moore, C

    Cardelino, B. H., Moore, C. E., Cardelino, C. A., et al. 2003, J. Phys. Chem. A, 107, 3708

    2003

  155. [163]

    Cardoso, D. V . V ., Ferrão, L. F. de A., spada, R. F. K., et al. 2012, Int. J. Quantum Chem., 112, 3269

    2012

  156. [164]

    Caridade, P. J. S. B., Rodrigues, S. P. J., Sousa, F., & Varandas, A. J. C. 2005, J. Phys. Chem. A, 109, 2356

    2005

  157. [165]

    A., Sun, Q., & Peeters, J

    Carl, S. A., Sun, Q., & Peeters, J. 2001, J. Chem. Phys., 114, 10332

    2001

  158. [166]

    A., Sun, Q., Vereecken, L., & Peeters, J

    Carl, S. A., Sun, Q., Vereecken, L., & Peeters, J. 2002, J. Phys. Chem. A, 106, 12242

    2002

  159. [167]

    A., Nguyen, H

    Carl, S. A., Nguyen, H. M. T., Elsamra, R. M. I., et al. 2005, J. Chem. Phys., 122, 114307

    2005

  160. [168]

    A., Still, T

    Carr, S. A., Still, T. J., Blitz, M. A., et al. 2013, J. Phys. Chem. A, 117, 11142

    2013

  161. [169]

    & Cacelli, I

    Carravetta, V . & Cacelli, I. 1999, Chem. Phys., 243, 77

    1999

  162. [170]

    & Dean, A

    Carstensen, H.-H. & Dean, A. M. 2005, Proc. Comb. Inst., 30, 995

    2005

  163. [171]

    M., & Deutschmann, O

    Carstensen, H.-H., Dean, A. M., & Deutschmann, O. 2007, Proc. Comb. Inst., 31, 149

    2007

  164. [172]

    R., & Smith, I

    Carty, D., Le Page, V ., Sims, I. R., & Smith, I. W. M. 2001, Chem. Phys. Lett., 344, 310

    2001

  165. [173]

    Carty, D., Goddard, A., Köhler, S. P. K., et al. 2006, J. Phys. Chem. A, 110, 3101

    2006

  166. [174]

    & Kurucz, R

    Castelli, F. & Kurucz, R. L. 2004, arXiv:astro-ph/0405087

    2004 arXiv

  167. [175]

    L., Donnellan, Z

    Caster, K. L., Donnellan, Z. N., Selby, T. M., & Goulay, F. 2019, J. Phys. Chem. A, 123, 5692

    2019

  168. [176]

    L., Selby, T

    Caster, K. L., Selby, T. M., Osborn, D. L., et al. 2021, J. Phys. Chem. A, 125, 6927

    2021

  169. [177]

    Catling, D. C. & Kasting, J. F. 2017, Atmospheric Evolution of Inhabited and Lifeless Worlds (Cambridge University Press)

    2017

  170. [178]

    I., et al

    Cernicharo, J., Agúndez, M., Kaiser, R. I., et al. 2021, A&A, 652, L9

    2021

  171. [179]

    Fuentetaja, R., Agúndez, M., et al

    Cernicharo, J. Fuentetaja, R., Agúndez, M., et al. 2022, A&A, 663, L9

    2022

  172. [180]

    & Heicklen, J

    Chanmugathas, C. & Heicklen, J. 1986, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 18, 701

    1986

  173. [181]

    & Goldsmith, C

    Chai, J. & Goldsmith, C. F. 2017, Proc. Comb. Inst., 36, 617

    2017

  174. [182]

    & Sengupta, S

    Chakrabarty, A. & Sengupta, S. 2019, AJ, 158, 39

    2019

  175. [183]

    & Lin, M

    Chakraborty, D. & Lin, M. C. 1999, J. Phys. Chem. A, 103, 601

    1999

  176. [184]

    F., Cooper, G., & Brion, C

    Chan, W. F., Cooper, G., & Brion, C. E. 1994, Chem. Phys., 180, 77

    1994

  177. [185]

    M., & Pritchard, H

    Chan, W.-T., Heck, S. M., & Pritchard, H. O. 2001, PCCP, 3, 56

    2001

  178. [186]

    & Kurucz, R

    Chance, K. & Kurucz, R. L. 2010, J. Quant. Spectr. Radiat. Transfer, 111, 1289

    2010

  179. [187]

    & Wang, N

    Chang, Y .-W. & Wang, N. S. 1995, Chem. Phys., 200, 431

    1995

  180. [188]

    Chang, J.-G., Chen, H.-T., Xu, S., & Lin, M. C. 2007, J. Phys. Chem. A, 111, 6789

    2007

  181. [189]

    K., Irwin, J., et al

    Charbonneau, D., Berta, Z. K., Irwin, J., et al. 2009, Nature, 462, 891

    2009

  182. [190]

    L., Sims, I

    Chastaing, D., James, P. L., Sims, I. R., & Smith, I. W. M. 1998, Faraday Dis- cuss., 109, 165

    1998

  183. [191]

    J., Sims, I

    Chastaing, D., James, P. J., Sims, I. R., & Smith, I. W. M. 1999, PCCP, 1, 2247

    1999

  184. [192]

    D., Sims, I

    Chastaing, D., Le Picard, S. D., Sims, I. R., et al. 2000, Chem. Phys. Lett., 331, 170

    2000

  185. [193]

    2012, A&A, 545, A12

    Cherchneff, I. 2012, A&A, 545, A12

    2012

  186. [194]

    Z., Judge, D

    Chen, F. Z., Judge, D. L., & Wu, C. Y . R. 2000, Chem. Phys., 260, 215

    2000

  187. [195]

    2016, Comput

    Chen, C., Song, J., Song, C., et al. 2016, Comput. Theor. Chem., 1075, 63

    2016

  188. [196]

    V ., & Lin, M

    Chen, H.-T., Pham, T. V ., & Lin, M. C. 2019, J. Phys. Chem. A, 123, 8358

    2019

  189. [197]

    M., Xia, W

    Choi, Y . M., Xia, W. S., Park, J., & Lin, M. C. 2000, J. Phys. Chem. A, 104, 7030

    2000

  190. [198]

    Choi, Y . M. & Lin, M. C. 2005, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 37, 261

    2005

  191. [199]

    & Konnov, A

    Christensen, M. & Konnov, A. A. 2017, Comb. Flame, 178, 97

    2017

  192. [200]

    G., Doner, A

    Christianson, M. G., Doner, A. C., Koritzke, A. L., et al. 2021, J. Quant. Spectr. Radiat. Transfer, 258, 107274

    2021

  193. [201]

    J., Eyob, B., et al

    Chu, T.-C., Buras, Z. J., Eyob, B., et al. 2020, J. Phys. Chem. A, 124, 2352

    2020

  194. [202]

    L., Rocchetto, M., Yurchenko, S

    Chubb, K. L., Rocchetto, M., Yurchenko, S. N., et al. 2021, A&A, 646, A21

    2021

  195. [203]

    L., Robert, S., Sousa-Silva, C., et al

    Chubb, K. L., Robert, S., Sousa-Silva, C., et al. 2024, RAS Techn. & Instrum., 3, 636

    2024

  196. [204]

    G., & Bottenheim, J

    Chung, K., Calvert, J. G., & Bottenheim, J. W. 1975, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 7, 161

    1975

  197. [205]

    Chupka, W. A. & Lifshitz, C. 1968, J. Chem. Phys., 48, 1109

    1968

  198. [206]

    & Largo, A

    Cimas, A. & Largo, A. 2006, J. Phys. Chem. A, 110, 10912

    2006

  199. [207]

    A., Kneizys, F

    Clough, S. A., Kneizys, F. X., & Davies, R. W. 1989, Atmos. Res., 23, 229

    1989

  200. [208]

    2021, AJ, 162, 174

    Cloutier, R., Charbonneau, D., Deming, D., et al. 2021, AJ, 162, 174

    2021

  201. [209]

    Clyne, M. A. A. & Stedman, D. H. 1967, J. Phys. Chem., 71, 3071

    1967

  202. [210]

    Clyne, M. A. A. & Ono, Y . 1982, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 2, 78, 1149

    1982

  203. [211]

    J., Hippler, H., & Troe, J

    Cobos, C. J., Hippler, H., & Troe, J. 1985, J. Phys. Chem., 89, 1778

    1985

  204. [212]

    J., Glarborg, P., Marshall, P., & Troe, J

    Cobos, C. J., Glarborg, P., Marshall, P., & Troe, J. 2023, Comb. Flame, 257, 112374

    2023

  205. [213]

    & Westberg, K

    Cohen, N. & Westberg, K. R. 1991, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 20, 1211 Colket III, M. B., Seery, D. J., & Palmer, H. B. 1989, Comb. Flame, 75, 343 Collier Cameron, A., Guenther, E., Smalley, B., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 407, 507 Colom-Díaz, J. M., Abián, M., Ballester, M. Y ., et al....

    1991

  206. [214]

    2021, A&A, 651, A33

    Cont, D., Yan, F., Reiners, A., et al. 2021, A&A, 651, A33

    2021

  207. [215]

    2022, A&A, 668, A53

    Cont, D., Yan, F., Reiners, A., et al. 2022, A&A, 668, A53

    2022

  208. [216]

    E., & Brion, C

    Cooper, G., Anderson, J. E., & Brion, C. E. 1996, Chem. Phys., 209, 61

    1996

  209. [217]

    Cooper, C. S. & Showman, A. P. 2006, ApJ, 649, 1048

    2006

  210. [218]

    L., Collins, M

    Coote, M. L., Collins, M. A., & Radom, L. 2003, Mol. Phys., 101, 1329

    2003

  211. [219]

    Cowan, N. B. & Agol, E. 2011, ApJ, 729, 54

    2011

  212. [220]

    A., Ammann, M., Crowley, J

    Cox, R. A., Ammann, M., Crowley, J. N., et al. 2020, Atm. Chem. Phys., 20, 13497

    2020

  213. [221]

    2001, Chem

    Cremer, D., Kraka, E., Crehuet, R., et al. 2001, Chem. Phys. Lett., 347, 268

    2001

  214. [222]

    1989, A&A, 213, 459

    Crovisier, J. 1989, A&A, 213, 459

    1989

  215. [223]

    Curran, H. J. 2006, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 38, 250 da Silva, G., Bozzelli, J. W., Liang, L., & Farrell, J. T. 2009, J. Phys. Chem. A, 113, 8923 da Silva, G. 2013, Environ. Sci. Tech., 47, 7766 Daële, V ., Laverdet, G., Le Bras, G., & Poulet, G. 1995, J. Phys. Chem., 99, 1470

    2006

  216. [224]

    2020, Comb

    Dai, L., Gersen, S., Glarborg, P., et al. 2020, Comb. Flame, 215, 134

    2020

  217. [225]

    2007, PCCP, 9, 4177

    Dammeier, J., Colberg, M., & Friedrichs, G. 2007, PCCP, 9, 4177

    2007

  218. [226]

    Dames, E. E. 2014, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 46, 176 D’Anna, B., Langer, S., Ljungström, E., et al. 2001, PCCP, 3, 1631

    2014

  219. [227]

    G., Moore III, K

    Dana, A. G., Moore III, K. B., Jasper, A. W., & Green, W. H. 2019, J. Phys. Chem. A, 123, 4679

    2019

  220. [228]

    J., Shu, Y

    Dang, L., Bell, T. J., Shu, Y . (Z.), et al. 2025, AJ, 169, 32

    2025

  221. [229]

    Danilack, A. D. & Goldsmith, C. F. 2019, Proc. Comb. Inst., 37, 687

    2019

  222. [230]

    Darwin, D. C. & Moore, C. B. 1995, J. Phys. Chem., 99, 13467

    1995

  223. [231]

    2013, PCCP, 15, 13888

    Daranlot, J., Hu, X., Xie, C., et al. 2013, PCCP, 15, 13888

    2013

  224. [232]

    2005, PCCP, 7, 2921

    Daugey, N., Caubet, P., Retail, B., et al. 2005, PCCP, 7, 2921

    2005

  225. [233]

    Daugey, N., Caubet, P., Bergeat, A. et al. 2008, PCCP, 10, 729

    2008

  226. [234]

    F., Kohse-Höinghaus, K., Chang, A

    Davidson, D. F., Kohse-Höinghaus, K., Chang, A. Y ., & Hanson, R. K. 1990, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 22, 513

    1990

  227. [235]

    Davidson, D. F. & Hanson, R. K. 1991, Symp. (Int.) Comb., 23, 267

    1991

  228. [236]

    Davies, J. H. & Davies, D. R. 2010, Solid Earth, 1, 5

    2010

  229. [237]

    G., Law, C

    Davis, S. G., Law, C. K., & Wang, H. 1999, J. Phys. Chem., 103, 5889

    1999

  230. [238]

    Dean, A. J. & Hanson, R. K. 1992, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 24, 517

    1992

  231. [239]

    Dean, A. M. & Bozzelli, J. W. 2000, Gas-Phase Combustion Chemistry, p 125, Springer

    2000

  232. [240]

    Decker, B. K. & Macdonald, R. G. 2001, J. Phys. Chem. A, 105, 6817

    2001

  233. [241]

    Decker, B. K. & MacDonald, R. G. 2003, J. Phys. Chem. A, 107, 9137

    2003

  234. [242]

    Deeyamulla, M. P. & Husain, D. 2006, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem, 184, 347 Article number, page 15 of 29 A&A proofs: manuscript no. pact

    2006

  235. [243]

    & Lesclaux, R

    Demissy, M. & Lesclaux, R. 1980, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 102, 2897

    1980

  236. [244]

    & Lesclaux, R

    Demissy, M. & Lesclaux, R. 1982, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 14, 1

    1982

  237. [245]

    B., Sander, S

    DeMore, W. B., Sander, S. P., Golden, D. M., et al. 1997, JPL Publication, 97-4

    1997

  238. [246]

    Denisov, E. T. 2008, Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B, 2, 58

    2008

  239. [247]

    1998, Ber

    Deppe, J., Friedrichs, G., Ibrahim, A., et al. 1998, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem., 102, 1474

    1998

  240. [248]

    D., Klippenstein, S

    DeSain, J. D., Klippenstein, S. J., Miller, J. A., & Taatjes, C. A. 2003, J. Phys. Chem. A, 107, 4415

    2003

  241. [249]

    W., Lin, M

    Diau, E. W., Lin, M. C., & Melius, C. F. 1994, J. Chem. Phys., 101, 3923

    1994

  242. [250]

    W., Halbgewachs, M

    Diau, E. W., Halbgewachs, M. J., Smith, A. R., & Lin, M. C. 1995, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 27, 867

    1995

  243. [251]

    & Benson, S

    Dobis, O. & Benson, S. W. 1993, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 115, 8798

    1993

  244. [252]

    Dobrijevic, M., Hébrard, E., Loison, J.-C., & Hickson, K. M. 2014, Icarus, 228, 324

    2014

  245. [253]

    M., & Gronoff, G

    Dobrijevic, M., Loison, J.-C., Hickson, K. M., & Gronoff, G. 2016, Icarus, 313, 339

    2016

  246. [254]

    J., et al

    Doddipatla, S., He, C., Goettl, S. J., et al. 2021, Sci. Adv., 7, eabg7003

    2021

  247. [255]

    & de Persis, S

    Dollet, A. & de Persis, S. 2007, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 80, 460

    2007

  248. [256]

    C., Moran, H

    Doner, A. C., Moran, H. A., Webb, A. R., et al. 2023, J. Quant. Spectr. Radiat. Transfer, 297, 108438

    2023

  249. [257]

    Dong, H., Ding, Y .-h., & Sun, C.-c. 2005, J. Chem. Phys., 122, 204321

    2005

  250. [258]

    A., Feng, W., et al

    Douglas, K., Blitz, M. A., Feng, W., et al. 2018, Icarus, 303, 10

    2018

  251. [259]

    M., Blitz, M

    Douglas, K. M., Blitz, M. A., Mangan, T. P., et al. 2020, J. Phys. Chem. A, 124, 7911

    2020

  252. [260]

    M., Gobrecht, D., & Plane, J

    Douglas, K. M., Gobrecht, D., & Plane, J. M. C. 2022, MNRAS, 515, 99

    2022

  253. [261]

    1985, Symp

    Dransfeld, P., Hack, W., Kurzke, H., et al. 1985, Symp. (Int.) Comb., 20, 655

    1985

  254. [262]

    Driscoll, J. N. & Warneck, P. 1968, J. Phys. Chem., 72, 3736

    1968

  255. [263]

    2016, A&A, 594, A69

    Drummond, B., Tremblin, P., Baraffe, I., et al. 2016, A&A, 594, A69

    2016

  256. [264]

    J., et al

    Drummond, B., Hébrard, E., Mayne, N. J., et al. 2020, A&A, 636, A68

    2020

  257. [265]

    Du, B., Zhang, W., Feng, C., & Zhou, Z. 2004, J. Mol. Struct.: Theochem, 712, 101

    2004

  258. [266]

    Du, B., Zhang, W., Feng, C., & Zhou, Z. 2005, J. Mol. Struct., 713, 71

    2005

  259. [267]

    S., Shepler, B

    Du, S., Francisco, J. S., Shepler, B. C., & Peterson, K. A. 2008, J. Chem. Phys., 128, 204306

    2008

  260. [268]

    & Carl, S

    Du, L. & Carl, S. A. 2012, J. Phys. Chem. A, 116, 10074

    2012

  261. [269]

    X., Li, W

    Duan, Z. X., Li, W. L., Xu, W. W., & Lv, S. J. 2013, J. Chem. Phys., 139, 094307

    2013

  262. [270]

    A., Johnson, G

    Durei, R. A., Johnson, G. M., & Smith, M. Y . 1971, Comb. Flame, 17, 197 Durán, R. P., Amorebieta, V . T., & Colussi, A. J. 1988, J. Phys. Chem., 92, 636 Durán, R. P., Amorebieta, V . T., & Colussi, A. J. 1989, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 21, 847 Dürrstein, S. H., Olzmann, M., Aguil...

    1971

  263. [271]

    2013, ApJS, 204, 20

    Dutuit, O., Carrasco, N., Thissen, R., et al. 2013, ApJS, 204, 20

    2013

  264. [272]

    2023, Nature, 625, 51 Edelbüttel-Einhaus, J., Hoyermann, K., Rohde, G., & Seeba, J

    Dyrek, A., Min, M., Decin, L., et al. 2023, Nature, 625, 51 Edelbüttel-Einhaus, J., Hoyermann, K., Rohde, G., & Seeba, J. 1992, Symp. (Int.) Comb., 24, 661

    2023

  265. [273]

    2003, Eur

    Eden, S., Limão-Vieira, P., Kendall, P., et al. 2003, Eur. Phys. J. D, 26, 201

    2003

  266. [274]

    Edvardsson, D., Battzer, P., Karlsson, L., et al. 1999, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys., 32, 2583

    1999

  267. [275]

    A., Kerr, J

    Edwards, D. A., Kerr, J. A., Lloyd, A. C. & Trotman-Dickenson, A. F. 1966, J. Chem. Soc. A, 1500

    1966

  268. [276]

    Edwards, M. A. & Hershberger, J. F. 1998, Chem. Phys., 234, 231

    1998

  269. [277]

    Ehbrecht, J., Hack, W., Rouveirolles, P., & Wagner, H. Gg. 1987, Ber. Bunsen- ges. Phys. Chem., 91, 700

    1987

  270. [278]

    & Corcoran, W

    England, C. & Corcoran, W. H. 1975, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam., 14, 55

    1975

  271. [279]

    J., Pekkanen, T

    Eskola, A. J., Pekkanen, T. J., Joshi, S. P., et al. 2019, Proc. Comb. Inst., 37, 291

    2019

  272. [280]

    Es-sebbar, E.-t., Khaled, F., Elwardany, A., & Farooq, A. 2016, J. Phys. Chem. A, 120, 7998

    2016

  273. [281]

    Faedi, F., Barros, S. C. C., Anderson, D. R., et al. 2011, A&A, 531, A40 Fagerström, K., Lund, A., Mahmoud, G., et al. 1993, Chem. Phys. Lett., 208, 321

    2011

  274. [282]

    & Laufer, A

    Fahr, A. & Laufer, A. H. 1990, J. Phys. Chem., 94, 726

    1990

  275. [283]

    Fahr, A., Laufer, A., Klein, R., & Braun, W. 1991, J. Phys. Chem., 95, 3218

    1991

  276. [284]

    & Nayak, A

    Fahr, A. & Nayak, A. 1996, Chem. Phys., 189, 725

    1996

  277. [285]

    & Nayak, A

    Fahr, A. & Nayak, A. 1996, Chem. Phys., 203, 351

    1996

  278. [286]

    Fairbairn, A. R. 1969, Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 312, 207

    1969

  279. [287]

    2000, Symp

    Faravelli, T., Goldaniga, A., Zappella, L., et al. 2000, Symp. (Int.) Comb., 28, 2601

    2000

  280. [288]

    2013, Chem

    Farnia, S., Vahedpour, M., Abedi, M., & Farrokhpour, H. 2013, Chem. Phys. Lett., 583, 190

    2013

  281. [289]

    2014, Venus

    Fegley, B. 2014, Venus. In Treatise on Geochemistry, ed. H. D. Holand and K. K. Turekian, New York: Elsevier, p. 127

    2014

  282. [290]

    Feng, R., Cooper, G., & Brion, C. E. 2002, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom., 123, 199

    2002

  283. [291]

    P., & Hershberger, J

    Feng, W., Meyer, J. P., & Hershberger, J. F. 2006, J. Phys. Chem. A, 110, 4458

    2006

  284. [292]

    & Hershberger, J

    Feng, W. & Hershberger, J. F. 2007, J. Phys. Chem. A, 111, 3831

    2007

  285. [293]

    & Hershberger, J

    Feng, W. & Hershberger, J. F. 2008, Chem. Phys. Lett., 457, 307

    2008

  286. [294]

    & Hershberger, J

    Feng, W. & Hershberger, J. F. 2011, J. Phys. Chem. A, 115, 286

    2011

  287. [295]

    & Hershberger, J

    Feng, W. & Hershberger, J. F. 2013, J. Phys. Chem. A, 117, 3585

    2013

  288. [296]

    Fernandez, A., Goumri, A., & Fontijn, A. 1998, J. Phys. Chem. A, 102, 168

    1998

  289. [297]

    & Fontijn, A

    Fernandez, A. & Fontijn, A. 2001, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 33, 343

    2001

  290. [298]

    X., Luther, K., & Troe, J

    Fernandes, R. X., Luther, K., & Troe, J. 2006, J. Phys. Chem. A, 110, 4442

    2006

  291. [299]

    2009, Planet

    Ferradaz, T., Bénilan, Y ., Fray, N., et al. 2009, Planet. Space Sci., 57, 10

    2009

  292. [300]

    Fifer, R. A. 1975, Proc. Int. Shock Tube Symp. Shock Tube Res. Soc., 613

    1975

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.