Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 67 references

Fluctuations of two-dimensional determinantal processes associated with Berezin--Toeplitz operators

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that for ground-state free-fermion determinantal point processes given by spectral projections of Berezin–Toeplitz operators $P_N V P_N$, smooth linear statistics satisfy a law of large numbers and a Gaussian central…

desk verdict Genuinely new CLT for Berezin-Toeplitz point processes with a non-conformal edge term; proof mostly solid, with fixable typos and one imported spectral input that needs spelling out. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.11707 v2 pith:U4ZXA2QQ submitted 2025-06-13 math.PR math-phmath.MPmath.SP

Alix Deleporte , Gaultier Lambert This is my paper
classification math.PRmath-phmath.MPmath.SP MSC 60G5560B2047B3535P20
keywords determinantalpointprocessesBerezin–ToeplitzoperatorsfreefermionsGinibreensembleSzegőlimittheoremlinearstatisticscentraldropletedgefluctuations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies the random point configuration of $N$ free fermions in the lowest Landau level with a confining potential $V$, i.e., the determinantal process with kernel the spectral projection of the Berezin–Toeplitz operator $P_N V P_N$ below energy $\mu$. Its main result is a two-term Szegő-type expansion: the Laplace transform of any smooth linear statistic with at most linear growth is Gaussian with variance $\Sigma(f) = \Sigma^1_D(f)+\Sigma^2_D(f)$, where $\Sigma^2_D$ is the $H^1$ seminorm of $f$ over the droplet and $\Sigma^1_D$ is a weighted $H^{1/2}$ seminorm along the level curve $\{V=\mu\}$. The boundary term is computed from the Fourier coefficients of $f$ along the Hamiltonian flow of $V$, so it depends on the dynamics and is generally not conformally invariant. This generalizes the Ginibre circular-law fluctuations and explains why edge fluctuations of such fermionic droplets are not universal in the Gaussian-free-field sense.

What carries the argument

The argument splits the linear statistic into bulk and edge parts using exponential decay of the correlation kernel away from the droplet and decorrelation estimates. In the bulk, the kernel is exponentially close to the Bergman projection $P_N$, so the CLT for the $\infty$-Ginibre process (Proposition 4.3) yields the $\Sigma^2_D$ term, even at arbitrary mesoscopic scales. At the edge, the local spectral operator $A = X_N(e^f-1)X_N$ is approximated by an infinite Toeplitz matrix $B$ with entries $\hat b_{j-k}(I_\mu)$ in the eigenbasis of $P_N V P_N$, using the Bohr–Sommerfeld/WKB structure of the eigenfunctions (Proposition 3.6) and a general replacement principle (Proposition 3.3); the strong Szegő limit theorem then produces $\Sigma^1_D$. A semiclassical two-term calculus for Berezin–Toeplitz operators contributes a complementary $\tfrac12\Sigma^2_D$ term from the edge region.

What would settle it

Take two potentials with the same droplet boundary but different Hamiltonian flows on $\partial D$, for instance a radial potential $V(|z|)$ and an anisotropic quadratic potential $V(x,y)=x^2+\alpha y^2$ whose level set is the same ellipse, and compute the limiting variance of a boundary-supported linear statistic $f$. If the variance is identical for both potentials, the flow-dependent formula for $\Sigma^1_D$ is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In precise terms, Theorem 1.2 asserts that for $f$ smooth near the droplet $D$ with $|f|\leq C(1+|\cdot|)$, one has $\mathbb{E}_{\Pi_N}[e^{X(f)}] = \exp(\mathbb{E}X(f) + \tfrac12 \Sigma(f) + o(1))$ with $\Sigma(f) = \Sigma^1_D(f)+\Sigma^2_D(f)$; consequently $(X(f)-\mathbb{E}X(f))/\sqrt{\Sigma(f)}$ converges to a standard Gaussian. The bulk term $\Sigma^2_D(f)=\tfrac12\int_D |\nabla f|^2\, d\gamma$ comes from the $\infty$-Ginibre process, while the boundary term $\Sigma^1_D(f)=\sum_{k\geq 1} k|\hat f_k|^2$ uses the Fourier coefficients $\hat f_k$ of $f$ along the curve $\{V=\mu\}$ parametrized by the Hamiltonian flow (1.6). The key qualitative content is that the edge fluctuations are encoded in the dynamics of $V$, not merely in the geometry of the droplet.

Load-bearing premise

The spectral data of $P_N V P_N$ in an energy window of size $O(1)$ around $\mu$ must follow the Bohr–Sommerfeld ladder governed by the Hamiltonian flow of $V$, which is derived from the assumption that the level set $\{V=\mu\}$ is a single smooth curve with $\nabla^\perp V \neq 0$; if the level set has several components that resonate, the edge variance formula could change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Particles condense uniformly in the droplet, with exponentially small probability of lying outside any mesoscopic neighbourhood of $D$.
  • Bulk local statistics are universal: the microscopic point process converges to the $\infty$-Ginibre process in the bulk.
  • The centred statistic $X(f)-\mathbb{E}X(f)$ is asymptotically Gaussian with variance $\Sigma^1_D(f)+\Sigma^2_D(f)$; for radial $V$ this reproduces the Ginibre circular-law fluctuation formula.
  • Edge fluctuations are not described by the Gaussian free field: the variance functional is not conformally invariant unless the potential is harmonic.
  • The bulk CLT holds at arbitrary mesoscopic scales for test functions supported away from the boundary.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the formula extends to multi-component level sets, the boundary variance should be written as a sum over components, but resonances between components may produce extra covariance terms not present in Theorem 1.2.
  • The replacement-principle technique suggests a route to edge CLTs for higher Landau levels by substituting the corresponding microlocal dynamics, provided the spectral projection still has Toeplitz asymptotics.
  • A direct numerical test is to exact-diagonalize $P_N V P_N$ for an anisotropic quadratic potential $V(x,y)=x^2+\alpha y^2$ and a test function supported near the ellipse boundary; the predicted variance depends on the flow, so agreement with the formula would confirm the flow-dependence, whereas agreement with a purely geometric variance would refute it.
  • The non-conformal dependence hints that the edge noise couples to the quantum metric of the lowest Landau level, which could be probed in anisotropic quantum-Hall-droplet experiments.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies determinantal point processes obtained from the ground-state projection Π_N = 1{P_N V P_N ≤ μ} of Berezin–Toeplitz operators on the Fock–Bargmann space, generalizing the N-Ginibre ensemble. Under Assumptions 1 on the potential V, the main result Theorem 1.2 gives a two-term Szegő-type asymptotic expansion for the log-Laplace transform of smooth linear statistics X(f), and hence a central limit theorem with variance Σ(f) = Σ^1_D(f) + Σ^2_D(f). Here Σ^2_D is the bulk H^1-seminorm and Σ^1_D is an H^{1/2}-seminorm computed along the Hamiltonian flow of V on the level set {V = μ}. The proof combines exponential decay of the kernel, decorrelation estimates separating bulk and boundary, a replacement principle reducing the boundary contribution to a Toeplitz determinant, and strong Szegő asymptotics.

Significance. If the proof is completed, the result is a substantial extension of the Rider–Virág CLT for the Ginibre ensemble to a natural family of fermionic point processes. The central new content is the boundary variance Σ^1_D, which depends on the Hamiltonian flow and is generally not conformally invariant; this is an interesting and falsifiable prediction. The paper is also methodologically valuable: the variance is constructed explicitly from the flow and the gradient with no fitted parameters, and the replacement principle and bulk mesoscopic CLT are stated as tools of independent interest. The cited prior work [27, 36, 67] provides building blocks rather than the main theorem, so I do not see circularity in the central claim.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.2, Proposition 3.6 and Remark 2.10] The approximate Toeplitz expansion (3.10), and hence the edge variance Σ^1_D, depends on spectral simplicity and Bohr–Sommerfeld spacing of H_N = P_N V P_N in the O(1) window [μ−δ/2, μ+δ/2]. Remark 2.10 asserts these properties by appealing to [27] and [67, Thm. 13.10], but Assumption 1(c) only gives one connected regular level {V = μ}; it does not by itself control all levels in the window, rule out accidental degeneracies for non-radial V, or guarantee the index condition I_{λ_k} = k + O(1) uniformly. The paper explicitly says resonances in multi-cut cases are expected generically absent, but no proof of absence is supplied even in the single-cut case. Since Proposition 3.7 and the strong Szegő step use these properties uniformly, the boundary variance is currently conditional on an imported spectral input that is not derived in the manuscript. Please provide a precise verification of the hypotheses of [27] (or a generic non-resonance theorem), or state Theorem 1.2 with this spectral assumption made explicit.
  2. [Proposition 3.2 and §5] The factors of 1/2 are inconsistent. Proposition 3.2 concludes tr[Π_N(ϑ(A)−ϑ(g))Π_N] ≃ (1/4)∫_D |∇f|² dγ = (1/4)Σ^2_D(f), while its own proof in Proposition 3.11 gives (1/4)∫_D |∇f|² dγ = (1/2)Σ^2_D(f), which is the value needed for Theorem 1.2. Moreover, the final assembly in Section 5 writes Υ(f_2,Π_N) → Σ^1_D(f_2)+Σ^2_D(f_2), omitting the factors 1/2 that appear in Propositions 3.1 and 3.11; taken literally this would give total variance 2Σ(f), contradicting Theorem 1.2. These displays must be corrected and checked consistently.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§5] The proof invokes Theorem 4.4 'with ϵ_N = 1', but Theorem 4.4 requires dist(x_N, {V > μ}) ≥ 2η_N = 2, which is not satisfied by an arbitrary fixed cutoff f_j supported in {V ≤ μ − δ/2}. The intended statement is the fixed-scale bulk CLT from Corollary 4.2; the proof should be rephrased accordingly.
  2. [Corollary 2.18 and §3] Corollary 2.18 defines the boundary cutoff χ_2 supported in {|V−μ| ≤ 3δ}, whereas Section 3 assumes the test function is supported in {|V−μ| < δ/2}. This can be made consistent by choosing the Corollary's δ small relative to the Section 3 parameter, but the paper should say so explicitly.
  3. [Proposition 2.13] In the display 'N^{−1}Π_N(x,x) → 1{V(x) < x}', the argument of the indicator should be V(x) < μ.
  4. [Remark 2.10] The phrase 'the eigenvalues of Π_N V_1 Π_N' should presumably read 'P_N V_1 P_N', since Π_N is the spectral projection whose eigenvalues are being described.
  5. [§5 and §2.4] There are small presentation errors: the reference 'Proposition 4.4' should be 'Theorem 4.4', the sentence after the cutoffs has a capitalization error ('in this case f_j ∈ C_0^∞'), and the proof begins by assuming f is bounded although Theorem 1.2 assumes at most linear growth; the reduction via Lemma 2.15 should be stated.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the two-term variance is derived from independent commutator and Toeplitz/Szegő estimates; no fitted parameter or self-imported uniqueness result is renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

Theorem 1.2 is obtained by two independent asymptotic reductions rather than by definition or fitting. The bulk variance Σ2_D(f)=1/2∫_D|∇f|^2 arises from the Hilbert–Schmidt norm of the commutator [PN,f] (Lemma 2.3 and Proposition 4.3), a computation that does not use the target theorem. The edge variance Σ1_D(f)=Σ_{k≥1} k|bf_k|^2 is obtained by showing, in Proposition 3.7, that the finite-rank operator A is N^{-1}-close in the sense of Proposition 3.3 to a Toeplitz matrix B whose symbol is e^f evaluated on the Hamiltonian flow, and then applying the classical strong Szegő limit theorem. The approximate Toeplitz structure (3.10) is imported from the authors' prior work [36, Prop. 2.11] together with Charles's Bohr–Sommerfeld results [27] and Zworski's semiclassical functional calculus [67]; these are separate published results with their own hypotheses and do not contain Theorem 1.2. No parameter is fitted to data and no variance term is defined as the limit it is supposed to explain. The reliance on spectral simplicity and N^{-1} eigenvalue spacing (Remark 2.10) is a substantive external input and a genuine correctness risk in degenerate or resonant cases—the paper itself flags resonances as an expected-generic open point—but importing such a hypothesis is not circular. Consequently the derivation chain is self-contained in the relevant sense; the boundary-variance formula is a new theorem rather than a restatement of its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters and no new entities. The central claim rests on the domain assumptions on V and on several standard theorems from semiclassical analysis, Toeplitz theory, and the authors' prior work. The key nonstandard input is Proposition 2.11 of [36], which is a self-cited prior result but is structurally different from the target theorem.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Assumption 1(a): {V ≤ µ+δ} compact and log(V−µ) Lipschitz on {V ≥ µ+δ}
    Ensures H_N has finite rank below µ+δ and eigenfunctions decay exponentially outside the droplet. Used in Lemma 2.1 and Proposition 2.5.
  • domain assumption Assumption 1(b): V is C^∞ on {V < µ+δ}
    Allows the use of semiclassical functional calculus, FBI transform, and the pseudodifferential representation of Berezin-Toeplitz operators. Used in Remark 2.10 and Section 3.
  • domain assumption Assumption 1(c): {V=µ} is a connected smooth curve with ∇^⊥ V ≠ 0
    Guarantees the Hamiltonian flow (1.6) parametrizes the edge and that the spectrum of H_N near µ is simple with spacing ~1/N, via Charles's results [27]. This is the structural premise for the approximate Toeplitz form of the edge matrix elements (Proposition 3.6).
  • standard math Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization of H_N near µ (from Charles [27])
    Invoked in Remark 2.10 to justify simple eigenvalues separated by ~1/N and exponentially close eigenfunctions after replacing V by a smooth bounded V1. See also Remark 2.10 and Proposition 3.6.
  • standard math Proposition 2.11 in [36] (authors' prior work)
    Gives the asymptotic expansion for matrix elements of pseudodifferential operators in the integrable setting, used to prove the approximate Toeplitz structure (3.10) in Proposition 3.6. It is an accepted external result, not the target theorem.
  • standard math Strong Szegő limit theorem for Toeplitz determinants
    Used in Section 3.3 to compute the limiting log-determinant for the Toeplitz matrix with symbol e^{f(z_θ)}.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fluctuations of two-dimensional determinantal processes associated with Berezin--Toeplitz operators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/U4ZXA2QQ

@misc{pith2026250611707,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fluctuations of two-dimensional determinantal processes associated with Berezin--Toeplitz operators},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/U4ZXA2QQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.11707}
}
read the original abstract

We consider a new class of determinantal point processes in the complex plane coming from the ground state of free fermions associated with Berezin--Toeplitz operators. These processes generalize the Ginibre ensemble from random matrix theory. We prove a two-term Szeg\H{o}-type asymptotic expansion for the Laplace transform of smooth linear statistics. This implies a law of large number and central limit theorem for the empirical field. The limiting variance includes both contributions from the bulk and boundary of the droplet. The boundary fluctuations depend on the Hamiltonian dynamics associated with the underlying operator and, generally, are not conformally invariant.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [27]

    Quasimodes and Bohr-Sommerfeld Conditions for the Toeplitz Operators

    Laurent Charles. Quasimodes and Bohr-Sommerfeld Conditions for the Toeplitz Operators. Com- munications in Partial Differential Equations , 28(9-10):1527–1566, 2003

    work page 2003

  2. [1]

    Random normal matrices and Ward identities

    Yacin Ameur, Haakan Hedenmalm, and Nikolai Makarov. Random normal matrices and Ward identities. Annals of Probability, 43(3):1157–1201, 2015

    work page 2015

  3. [2]

    Fluctuations of eigenvalues of random normal matrices

    Yacin Ameur, H ˚ akan Hedenmalm, and Nikolai Makarov. Fluctuations of eigenvalues of random normal matrices. Duke mathematical journal , 159(1):31–81, 2011

    work page 2011

  4. [3]

    Berezin transform in polynomial Bergman spaces

    Yacin Ameur, Nikolai Makarov, and H ˚ akan Hedenmalm. Berezin transform in polynomial Bergman spaces. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , 63(12):1533–1584, 2010

    work page 2010

  5. [4]

    Sharp total variation rates of convergence for fluctuations of linear statistics of $\beta$-ensembles

    J¨ urgen Angst, Ronan Herry, Dominique Malicet, and Guillaume Poly. Sharp total variation rates of convergence for fluctuations of linear statistics of β-ensembles. (arXiv:2403.17211), 2024

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  6. [5]

    The two-dimensional Coulomb plasma: Quasi-free approximation and central limit theorem

    Roland Bauerschmidt, Paul Bourgade, Miika Nikula, and Horng-Tzer Yau. The two-dimensional Coulomb plasma: Quasi-free approximation and central limit theorem. Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics , 23(4):841–1002, 2019

    work page 2019

  7. [6]

    Mean–field evolution of fermionic systems

    Niels Benedikter, Marcello Porta, and Benjamin Schlein. Mean–field evolution of fermionic systems. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 331(3):1087–1131, 2014

    work page 2014

  8. [7]

    F. A. Berezin. General concept of quantization. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 40(2):153–174, 1975

    work page 1975

Show all 67 references
  1. [8]

    Sharp asymptotics for Toeplitz determinants and convergence towards the Gaus- sian free field on Riemann surfaces

    Robert Berman. Sharp asymptotics for Toeplitz determinants and convergence towards the Gaus- sian free field on Riemann surfaces. International Mathematics Research Notices , 2012(22):5031– 5062, 2012

    2012

  2. [9]

    Determinantal point processes and fermions on complex manifolds: Bulk uni- versality

    Robert Berman. Determinantal point processes and fermions on complex manifolds: Bulk uni- versality. In Algebraic and Analytic Microlocal Analysis , number 269 in Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, pages 341–393. Springer, 2018

    2018

  3. [10]

    A direct approach to Bergman kernel asymptotics for positive line bundles

    Robert Berman, Bo Berndtsson, and Johannes Sj¨ ostrand. A direct approach to Bergman kernel asymptotics for positive line bundles. Arkiv f¨ or Matematik, 46(2):197–217, 2008

    2008

  4. [11]

    Robert J. Berman. Determinantal Point Processes and Fermions on Polarized Complex Manifolds: Bulk Universality. In Algebraic and Analytic Microlocal Analysis , pages 341–393. Springer, 2013

    2013

  5. [12]

    Robert J. Berman. Determinantal point processes and fermions on complex manifolds: Large deviations and bosonization. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 327(1):1–47, 2014. 37

    2014

  6. [13]

    Toeplitz quantization of K¨ ahler manifolds and gl (N), N→ ∞limits

    Martin Bordemann, Eckhard Meinrenken, and Martin Schlichenmaier. Toeplitz quantization of K¨ ahler manifolds and gl (N), N→ ∞limits. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 165(2):281– 296, 1994

    1994

  7. [14]

    Around the circular law

    Charles Bordenave and Djalil Chafa ¨ ı. Around the circular law. Probability Surveys, 9(none):1–89, 2012

    2012

  8. [15]

    Determinantal point processes

    Alexei Borodin. Determinantal point processes. In The Oxford Handbook of Random Matrix Theory, pages 231–249. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2011

    2011

  9. [16]

    Gaussian asymptotics of discrete β-ensembles

    Alexei Borodin, Vadim Gorin, and Alice Guionnet. Gaussian asymptotics of discrete β-ensembles. Publications math´ ematiques de l’IH´ES, 125(1):1–78, 2017

    2017

  10. [17]

    Fluctuations for non-Hermitian dynamics

    Paul Bourgade, Giorgio Cipolloni, and Jiaoyang Huang. Fluctuations for non-Hermitian dynamics. (arXiv:2409.02902), 2024

    2024

  11. [18]

    Liouville quantum gravity from random matrix dynamics

    Paul Bourgade and Hugo Falconet. Liouville quantum gravity from random matrix dynamics. (arXiv:2206.03029), 2022

    2022 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Optimal local laws and CLT for the circular Riesz gas

    Jeanne Boursier. Optimal local laws and CLT for the circular Riesz gas. (arXiv:2112.05881), 2023

    2023 arXiv

  13. [20]

    The Spectral Theory of Toeplitz Operators

    Louis Boutet de Monvel and Victor Guillemin. The Spectral Theory of Toeplitz Operators . Num- ber 99 in Annals of Mathematics Studies. Princeton University Press, 1981

    1981

  14. [21]

    Sur la singularit´ e des noyaux de Bergman et de Szeg¨ o.Journ´ ees´Equations aux D´ eriv´ ees Partielles, 34–35:123–164, 1975

    Louis Boutet de Monvel and Johannes Sj¨ ostrand. Sur la singularit´ e des noyaux de Bergman et de Szeg¨ o.Journ´ ees´Equations aux D´ eriv´ ees Partielles, 34–35:123–164, 1975

    1975

  15. [22]

    Central limit theorems for biorthogonal ensembles and asymp- totics of recurrence coefficients

    Jonathan Breuer and Maurice Duits. Central limit theorems for biorthogonal ensembles and asymp- totics of recurrence coefficients. Journal of the American Mathematical Society , 30(1):27–66, 2017

    2017

  16. [23]

    Magnetic Quantum Hamiltonians and Berezin–Toeplitz Op- erators

    Vincent Bruneau and Georgi Raikov. Magnetic Quantum Hamiltonians and Berezin–Toeplitz Op- erators. Unpublished. 2023

    2023

  17. [24]

    Fluctuations of particle systems determined by Schur generating functions

    Alexey Bufetov and Vadim Gorin. Fluctuations of particle systems determined by Schur generating functions. Advances in Mathematics , 338:702–781, 2018

    2018

  18. [25]

    Forrester

    Sung-Soo Byun and Peter J. Forrester. Progress on the Study of the Ginibre Ensembles , volume 3 of KIAS Springer Series in Mathematics . Springer Nature, Singapore, 2025

    2025

  19. [26]

    Berezin-Toeplitz Operators, a Semi-Classical Approach

    Laurent Charles. Berezin-Toeplitz Operators, a Semi-Classical Approach. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 239(1-2):1–28, 2003

    2003

  20. [28]

    Entanglement entropy and Berezin-Toeplitz operators

    Laurent Charles and Benoit Estienne. Entanglement entropy and Berezin-Toeplitz operators. Com- munications in Mathematical Physics , 2018

    2018

  21. [29]

    Central Limit Theorem for Linear Eigen- value Statistics of Non-Hermitian Random Matrices

    Giorgio Cipolloni, L´ aszl´ o Erd˝ os, and Dominik Schr¨ oder. Central Limit Theorem for Linear Eigen- value Statistics of Non-Hermitian Random Matrices. Communications on Pure and Applied Math- ematics, 76(5):946–1034, 2023

    2023

  22. [30]

    Mesoscopic central limit theorem for non-Hermitian random matrices

    Giorgio Cipolloni, L´ aszl´ o Erd˝ os, and Dominik Schr¨ oder. Mesoscopic central limit theorem for non-Hermitian random matrices. Probability Theory and Related Fields , 188(3):1131–1182, 2024

    2024

  23. [31]

    Maximum of the characteristic polynomial of i.i.d

    Giorgio Cipolloni and Benjamin Landon. Maximum of the characteristic polynomial of i.i.d. ma- trices. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , Early access, 2025

    2025

  24. [32]

    Partition function for the 2d Coulomb gas on a Jordan curve

    Klara Courteaut and Kurt Johansson. Partition function for the 2d Coulomb gas on a Jordan curve. Annales Fennici Mathematici , 50(1):109–144, 2025

    2025

  25. [33]

    Planar Coulomb gas on a Jordan arc at any temperature

    Klara Courteaut, Kurt Johansson, and Fredrik Viklund. Planar Coulomb gas on a Jordan arc at any temperature. (arXiv:2504.19887), 2025

    2025 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Toeplitz matrices and Toeplitz determinants under the impetus of the Ising model: Some history and some recent results

    Percy Deift, Alexander Its, and Igor Krasovsky. Toeplitz matrices and Toeplitz determinants under the impetus of the Ising model: Some history and some recent results. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , 66(9):1360–1438, 2013

    2013

  27. [35]

    Fractional exponential decay in the forbidden region for Toeplitz operators

    Alix Deleporte. Fractional exponential decay in the forbidden region for Toeplitz operators. Docu- menta Mathematica, 25:1315–1351, 2020. 38

    2020

  28. [36]

    Central limit theorem for smooth statistics of one- dimensional free fermions

    Alix Deleporte and Gaultier Lambert. Central limit theorem for smooth statistics of one- dimensional free fermions. Journal of the London Mathematical Society , Accepted for publication, 2024

    2024

  29. [37]

    Universality for free fermions and the local Weyl law for semiclassical Schr¨ odinger operators.J

    Alix Deleporte and Gaultier Lambert. Universality for free fermions and the local Weyl law for semiclassical Schr¨ odinger operators.J. Euro. Math. Soc. , Online First, 2024

    2024

  30. [38]

    Persi Diaconis and Steven N. Evans. Linear functionals of eigenvalues of random matrices. Trans- actions of the American Mathematical Society , 353(7):2615–2633, 2001

    2001

  31. [39]

    Precise deviations for disk counting statistics of invariant determinantal processes

    Marcel Fenzl and Gaultier Lambert. Precise deviations for disk counting statistics of invariant determinantal processes. International Mathematics Research Notices , 2022(10):7420–7494, 2022

    2022

  32. [40]

    Harmonic Analysis in Phase Space

    Gerald Folland. Harmonic Analysis in Phase Space . Number 122 in Annals of Mathematical Studies. Princeton University Press, 1989

    1989

  33. [41]

    Statistical Ensembles of Complex, Quaternion, and Real Matrices

    Jean Ginibre. Statistical Ensembles of Complex, Quaternion, and Real Matrices. Journal of Math- ematical Physics, 6(3):440–449, 1965

    1965

  34. [42]

    Asymptotics of Random Matrices and Related Models: The Uses of Dyson- Schwinger Equations, volume 130 of CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics

    Alice Guionnet. Asymptotics of Random Matrices and Related Models: The Uses of Dyson- Schwinger Equations, volume 130 of CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2019

    2019

  35. [43]

    Ben Hough, Manjunath Krishnapur, Yuval Peres, and B´ alint Vir´ ag

    J. Ben Hough, Manjunath Krishnapur, Yuval Peres, and B´ alint Vir´ ag. Determinantal processes and independence. Probability surveys, 3:206–229, 2006

    2006

  36. [44]

    On Szeg¨ o’s asymptotic formula for Toeplitz determinants and generalizations

    Kurt Johansson. On Szeg¨ o’s asymptotic formula for Toeplitz determinants and generalizations. Bulletin des Sciences Math´ ematiques, 2e s´ erie, 112(3):257–304, 1988

    1988

  37. [45]

    On fluctuations of eigenvalues of random Hermitian matrices

    Kurt Johansson. On fluctuations of eigenvalues of random Hermitian matrices. Duke Mathematical Journal, 91(1):151–204, 1998

    1998

  38. [46]

    Random matrices and determinantal processes

    Kurt Johansson. Random matrices and determinantal processes. In Mathematical Statistical Physics, Les Houches Summer School , pages 1–55. Elsevier B. V., Amsterdam, 2006

    2006

  39. [47]

    Coulomb gas and the Grunsky operator on a Jordan domain with corners

    Kurt Johansson and Fredrik Viklund. Coulomb gas and the Grunsky operator on a Jordan domain with corners. (arXiv:2309.00308), 2023

    2023

  40. [48]

    CLT for biorthogonal ensembles and related combinatorial identities

    Gaultier Lambert. CLT for biorthogonal ensembles and related combinatorial identities. Advances in Mathematics , 329:590–648, 2018

    2018

  41. [49]

    Law of large numbers for the maximum of the two-dimensional Coulomb gas potential

    Gaultier Lambert, Thomas Lebl´ e, and Ofer Zeitouni. Law of large numbers for the maximum of the two-dimensional Coulomb gas potential. Electronic Journal of Probability , 29:1–36, 2024

    2024

  42. [50]

    Laughlin

    Robert B. Laughlin. Elementary Theory: The Incompressible Quantum Fluid. In Richard E. Prange and Steven M. Girvin, editors, The Quantum Hall Effect , pages 233–301. Springer US, New York, NY, 1987

    1987

  43. [51]

    DLR equations, number-rigidity and translation-invariance for infinite-volume limit points of the 2DOCP

    Thomas Lebl´ e. DLR equations, number-rigidity and translation-invariance for infinite-volume limit points of the 2DOCP. (arXiv:2410.04958), 2024

    2024 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Large deviation principle for empirical fields of Log and Riesz gases

    Thomas Lebl´ e and Sylvia Serfaty. Large deviation principle for empirical fields of Log and Riesz gases. Inventiones mathematicae, 210(3):645–757, 2017

    2017

  45. [53]

    Fluctuations of two dimensional Coulomb gases

    Thomas Lebl´ e and Sylvia Serfaty. Fluctuations of two dimensional Coulomb gases. Geometric and Functional Analysis, 28(2):443–508, 2018

    2018

  46. [54]

    Coulomb and Riesz gases: The known and the unknown

    Mathieu Lewin. Coulomb and Riesz gases: The known and the unknown. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 63(6):061101, 2022

    2022

  47. [55]

    The spin-c Dirac operator on high tensor powers of a line bundle

    Xiaonan Ma and George Marinescu. The spin-c Dirac operator on high tensor powers of a line bundle. Mathematische Zeitschrift , 240(3):651–664, 2002

    2002

  48. [56]

    Random Partitions and the Quantum Benjamin-Ono Hierarchy

    Alexander Moll. Random Partitions and the Quantum Benjamin-Ono Hierarchy. (arXiv:1508.03063), 2017

    2017 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Anisotropic Quantum Hall Droplets

    Blagoje Oblak, Bastien Lapierre, Per Moosavi, Jean-Marie St´ ephan, and Benoit Estienne. Anisotropic Quantum Hall Droplets. Physical Review X , 14(1):011030, 2024. 39

    2024

  50. [58]

    On the maximum of the potential of a general two-dimensional Coulomb gas.Electronic Communications in Probability, 30:1–17, 2025

    Luke Peilen. On the maximum of the potential of a general two-dimensional Coulomb gas.Electronic Communications in Probability, 30:1–17, 2025

    2025

  51. [59]

    Complex determinantal processes and H1 noise

    Brian Rider and B´ alint Vir´ ag. Complex determinantal processes and H1 noise. Electronic Journal of Probability, 12:1238–1257, 2007

    2007

  52. [60]

    The noise in the circular law and the Gaussian free field.International Mathematics Research Notices, (9):rnm006, 2007

    Brian Rider and B´ alint Vir´ ag. The noise in the circular law and the Gaussian free field.International Mathematics Research Notices, (9):rnm006, 2007

    2007

  53. [61]

    Gaussian fluctuations and free energy expansion for Coulomb gases at any temper- ature

    Sylvia Serfaty. Gaussian fluctuations and free energy expansion for Coulomb gases at any temper- ature. Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´ e, Probabilit´ es et Statistiques, 59(2):1074–1142, 2023

    2023

  54. [62]

    Lectures on Coulomb and Riesz gases

    Sylvia Serfaty. Lectures on Coulomb and Riesz gases. (arXiv:2407.21194), 2024

    2024 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Quantitative stability of the free boundary in the obstacle problem

    Sylvia Serfaty and Joaquim Serra. Quantitative stability of the free boundary in the obstacle problem. Analysis & PDE , 11(7):1803–1839, 2018

    2018

  56. [64]

    Asymptotics of almost holomorphic sections on symplectic manifolds

    Bernard Shiffman and Steve Zelditch. Asymptotics of almost holomorphic sections on symplectic manifolds. Journal f¨ ur die reine und angewandte Mathematik, 544:181–222, 2002

    2002

  57. [65]

    Point processes in arbitrary dimension from fermionic gases, random matrix theory, and number theory

    Salvatore Torquato, A Scardicchio, and Chase E Zachary. Point processes in arbitrary dimension from fermionic gases, random matrix theory, and number theory. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment , 2008(11):P11019, 2008

    2008

  58. [66]

    Szeg¨ o kernels and a theorem of Tian.Int

    Steve Zelditch. Szeg¨ o kernels and a theorem of Tian.Int. Math. Research Notices, 1998(6):317–331, 2000

    1998

  59. [67]

    Semiclassical Analysis, volume 138

    Maciej Zworski. Semiclassical Analysis, volume 138. American Mathematical Soc., 2012. 40

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.