Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 116 references

Kinetics of Amorphous Defect Phases Measured Through Ultrafast Nanocalorimetry

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper reports the first calorimetric Time-Temperature-Transformation curve for a grain boundary confined amorphous-to-ordered transition, measured in Al-Ni by isothermal ultrafast nanocalorimetry, with a critical cooling rate of…

desk verdict A well-executed first calorimetric TTT curve for a grain-boundary transition, but the central exotherm assignment is internally undermined by the paper's own Al3Ni attribution, so the critical cooling rate needs direct microstructural verification before it is accepted. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.12179 v1 pith:KNGIFOLS submitted 2025-06-13 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

W. Streit Cunningham , Tianjiao Lei , Hannah C. Howard , Timothy J Rupert , Daniel S. Gianola This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords amorphousdefectphasescomplexionsultrafastdifferentialscanningcalorimetrygrainboundarypre-meltingTime-Temperature-Transformationcurvecriticalcoolingratenanocrystallinealuminumalloysthermalstability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to turn a question that has only been answered after the fact—how fast a nanoscale amorphous layer at a grain boundary transforms back into an ordered boundary—into a quantity measured live. The authors use ultrafast differential scanning calorimetry to anneal nanocrystalline Al-based alloys, quench them, and then hold them at fixed temperatures while recording the transformation heat flow. For Al-2at.%Ni they build a Time-Temperature-Transformation curve for the grain boundary confined disordered-to-ordered transition and read off a critical cooling rate of -2,400 °C/s, the minimum quench needed to keep the amorphous defect phase frozen in. If correct, this would be the first direct calorimetric kinetics measurement for a grain boundary confined phase transition, replacing post-mortem microscopy estimates and opening a route to design alloys by controlling interfacial phases.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing experimental machinery is an isothermal ultrafast nanocalorimetry profile: heat the sample into the pre-melting regime (625 °C for Al-Ni) for 1.5 s, quench at -10,000 °C/s to a hold temperature Ti between 520 and 580 °C, and record the heat flow during the 6 s hold. A Time-Temperature-Transformation (TTT) curve is the map of transformation onset and completion times versus hold temperature, and the critical cooling rate is estimated by the slope of a line from the pre-melting temperature to the curve's nose. The conceptual machinery is the Kikuchi-Cahn energy balance, $\gamma_{\rm GB} > (\gamma_{\rm CL}^{(1)} + \gamma_{\rm CL}^{(2)}) + \Delta G_{\rm amorphous}\, h$, which says an amorphous layer becomes stable at a grain boundary when the boundary's own energy exceeds the cost of two crystal-liquid interfaces plus the volumetric penalty of the disordered phase. This balance sets the pre-melting regime that the calorimetric profile is designed to enter and leave.

What would settle it

Run the identical isothermal TTT protocol on Al-Ni samples whose grain boundaries are not decorated with solute, such as pure Al or coarse-grained Al-2at.%Ni without prior segregation, and check whether the 20 ms exotherm between 520 and 580 °C still appears; if it does, the peak is not the grain boundary disordered-to-ordered transition. Alternatively, interrupt the isothermal hold exactly at the TTT nose at 540-555 °C, quench, and inspect the same powder by TEM: the curve predicts a partially transformed mixture of amorphous and ordered boundaries, not Al3Ni precipitates.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the kinetics of a grain boundary confined amorphous defect phase—a stable disordered layer, a few nanometers thick, that replaces a conventional ordered grain boundary at high temperature—can be measured directly with isothermal nanocalorimetry. In Al-2at.%Ni, the one system among the four studied whose phase diagram shows a single competing intermetallic, a single rapid exotherm appears during each 6 s isothermal hold between 520 and 580 °C after a quench from 625 °C. The paper assigns this 20 ms exotherm to the disordered-to-ordered transition at the grain boundaries, maps the onset and end of the peak to build a TTT curve whose nose lies at 540-555 °C, and derives a critical cooling rate of -2,400 °C/s, consistent with the cooling-rate range where the exotherm broadens in direct cooling experiments. The paper further argues that the width of the pre-melting regime relative to the eutectic, |ΔT|, is a practical metric for amorphous defect phase forming ability, and that repeated cycling data show the disordered phase reforms and stabilizes nanocrystalline grain sizes at homologous temperatures above 0.9 TM.

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on treating the single rapid heat-release peak in Al-Ni as the grain boundary's amorphous layer ordering, with no direct image from those same samples ruling out Al3Ni intermetallic precipitation as the source.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A calorimetric TTT curve for a grain boundary confined transition means the ordering kinetics of amorphous defect phases can be measured directly, without waiting for post-mortem microscopy, and compared across alloy systems on the same footing.
  • The measured critical cooling rate of -2,400 °C/s for Al-Ni falls within the range reported for Al-based metallic glasses, so binary alloys with segregated grain boundaries can exhibit glass-formation-like kinetic resistance despite simple chemistry.
  • The onset of the pre-melting regime relative to the eutectic (|ΔT|) can serve as a fast experimental screen for amorphous defect phase forming ability: Al-Y with |ΔT| = 77 °C forms the phase under slow cooling, while Al-Ni with |ΔT| = 48 °C requires a fast quench.
  • Repeated annealing shows the amorphous defect phase reforms after each cycle and keeps grain sizes near 25-75 nm after 600 iterations at above 0.9 TM, so thermal stability of nanocrystalline alloys can be engineered through interfacial phase selection.
  • Rapid quenching generates enough frozen-in vacancies to nucleate voids and pores during subsequent anneals, which means processing windows for retaining amorphous defect phases must balance quench rate against vacancy damage.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper's direct evidence, the same isothermal protocol should map the kinetics of other grain boundary complexion transitions—wetting films, multilayer segregation—wherever CALPHAD predicts a single competing intermetallic, turning a microscopy-limited field into a calorimetric one.
  • If the TTT assignment is right, the comparison with metallic-glass critical cooling rates predicts that the ternary and quaternary Al-based systems in this paper will show critical cooling rates far below -2,400 °C/s; that is checkable with the same protocol.
  • The vacancy-driven pore formation identified in repeated cycling implies that the measurement tool itself alters the defect population under study, so TTT curves measured before and after pre-cycling could reveal whether the apparent kinetics shift as quenched-in vacancies saturate.
  • A further testable consequence is that |ΔT|, the pre-melting onset relative to the eutectic, should correlate with critical cooling rate across a broader alloy series, giving a cheap screening metric for amorphous defect phase formability.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports an ultrafast differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) study of grain-boundary amorphous defect phases in four nanocrystalline Al-based alloys (Al-Ni, Al-Y, Al-Ni-Y, Al-Mg-Y). The central claim is the first calorimetric Time-Temperature-Transformation (TTT) curve for a grain-boundary confined disordered-to-ordered transition, measured in Al-Ni by isothermal nanocalorimetry, with a derived critical cooling rate of -2,400 °C/s. The paper also proposes a |ΔT| metric for amorphous defect phase forming ability, correlates DSC signatures with TEM microstructure, and demonstrates microstructural stability over 1,000 repeated annealing cycles.

Significance. If the TTT curve genuinely represents the grain-boundary transition kinetics, this would be a valuable direct measurement in a field lacking such data, offering a quantitative link between interfacial thermodynamics, kinetics, and alloy design. The work is strengthened by a systematic alloy selection rationale, correlative TEM evidence of amorphous defect phases in the binary systems, and the repeated-annealing stability data. However, the central quantitative result depends on a single-peak attribution that is not yet convincingly established.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.5 and §3.6, Figure 9 and Figure 10] The TTT curve and the derived critical cooling rate of -2,400 °C/s rest on the assignment of the single 20 ms isothermal exotherm at 520–580 °C to the grain-boundary disordered-to-ordered transition. Section 3.6, however, assigns an exothermic signal TC2 at ~523 °C (dropping to ~510 °C after cycling) to Al3Ni crystallization, citing Ref. [94] for Al3Ni formation at heating/cooling rates exceeding 10^4 K/s. Since 523 °C lies within the isothermal hold range used for the TTT curve, the lower-temperature isothermal exotherms in Figure 9a could contain or be entirely due to Al3Ni precipitation. The paper provides no microstructural evidence from the actual TTT samples to rule out this contribution, so the TTT curve and the critical cooling rate are not yet cleanly attributable to the grain-boundary transition.
  2. [§3.3, point 3] The exclusion argument that 'only one system, Al-Ni, is expected to form only a single intermetallic. Thus, the single exothermal peak ... can be attributed to the grain boundary confined disordered-to-ordered transition' is logically insufficient. A single intermetallic (Al3Ni) would also produce a single exothermic peak, and the CALPHAD diagram in Figure 3d indeed predicts Al3Ni formation. The observed peak at ~538 °C in Figure 5d overlaps the temperature range where Al3Ni is known to precipitate rapidly. The assignment therefore requires additional justification, such as a control experiment on a system without a grain-boundary transition, comparison of peak area with expected Al3Ni volume fraction, or direct TEM/EDS of the post-isothermal microstructure. As written, the central claim is unsupported.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.3, Table 2] The |ΔT| metric is defined and then used to rank the same four alloys from which it was derived, which is a post-hoc correlation. The paper does acknowledge the analogy to the supercooled liquid region, but it should be framed more explicitly as a hypothesis to be validated on independent systems rather than as an established materials selection parameter.
  2. [§3.5, Figure 9] The TTT construction would benefit from reporting the specific number of isothermal hold temperatures and replicate runs used, and from describing the criterion for defining the onset and end of the 20 ms exotherm (e.g., baseline subtraction method). This would improve the reproducibility of the derived critical cooling rate.
  3. [Figure 1b and Section 1] There are minor typographical errors: 'Metter' in the Figure 1b caption should be 'Mettler', 'microstructral' in the Introduction should be 'microstructural', and 'collaborating' in Section 3.5 should be 'corroborating'.
  4. [§3.6, Figure 10] The assignment of TC2 to Al3Ni crystallization is described as 'likely', and the same temperature range is used in the TTT analysis. The authors should either provide direct confirmation that Al3Ni does not interfere with the isothermal TTT measurements or discuss explicitly how their Section 3.6 interpretation is consistent with the TTT attribution.
  5. [§2.2] All DSC data are presented as raw heat flow without mass normalization, which is acknowledged; however, sample-to-sample variability in deposited powder mass could affect the quantitative comparison of exotherm areas and kinetics. A brief statement on the expected reproducibility would be helpful.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Al-Ni TTT curve and critical cooling rate are direct calorimetric measurements; the Al3Ni peak ambiguity is a correctness risk, not a redefinition.

full rationale

The central kinetic result — the Al-Ni TTT curve and the critical cooling rate of −2,400 °C/s — is read directly from measured isothermal nanocalorimetry traces (Figure 9), not from a parameter fitted to the quantity it purports to predict. The TTT construction follows standard ultrafast-DSC methodology and does not use any fitted value as an input; the critical cooling rate is obtained by drawing a line from the pre-melting temperature to the nose of the measured curve, and its agreement with the cooling-rate-dependent peak broadening in Figure 5d is a consistency check, not a fit. The |ΔT| metric is explicitly proposed post hoc as a suggested correlation with previously established amorphous-defect-phase formability rankings, and the paper does not present it as an independent prediction. Prior self-citations (Schuler/Rupert, Lei et al., Grigorian/Rupert, Cunningham et al.) are used for context, selection rules, and prior microstructural evidence; the current paper supplies its own TEM (Figures 6–8, 11–12) and does not reduce its load-bearing argument to those citations. The most serious weakness — the Section 3.6 assignment of an Al3Ni crystallization exotherm at ~523 °C, inside the 520–580 °C isothermal TTT range — is an attribution or correctness risk for the central claim, not a circularity: no equation or fitted parameter makes the TTT curve equivalent to its inputs by construction. Accordingly, no circular step meets the quoting standard.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data: the critical cooling rate is a slope derived directly from measured TTT onset/end times, and the |ΔT| metric is a measured temperature difference. The six listed axioms are domain assumptions inherited from the complexion/premelting literature, calorimetry interpretation, CALPHAD reliability, and the vacancy-quenching model. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The endothermic DSC signal below the eutectic in all four alloys is attributed to grain boundary pre-melting (formation of amorphous defect phase) rather than intermetallic dissolution.
    Section 3.3: the authors argue intermetallic dissolution is unlikely because the predicted intermetallics are stable in this temperature range, but no direct microstructural verification is provided for the same powder samples.
  • domain assumption The single exothermic peak in Al-Ni cooling curves and isothermal holds is entirely due to the grain boundary disordered-to-ordered transition, with no contribution from Al3Ni precipitation or other bulk transformations.
    Sections 3.3 and 3.5: the assignment is based on the CALPHAD prediction that Al-Ni forms only one intermetallic; the TTT curve and critical cooling rate depend on this identification.
  • domain assumption Cooling at -10,000 °C/s kinetically freezes the amorphous defect phase, and the broad exotherm plus step-like heat flow change in DSC indicate a glass transition in the grain boundary layer.
    Section 3.3, Figure 4b: standard interpretation from metallic glass literature (Ref 74).
  • domain assumption The CALPHAD databases used (Ref 55 for Al-Ni/Al-Y/Al-Ni-Y, Ref 56 for Al-Mg-Y) accurately predict eutectic temperatures, solidus boundaries, and intermetallic stability for the Al-rich compositions.
    Sections 2.4 and 3.2: phase diagrams set the upper temperature bounds for the thermal profiles and inform peak assignment.
  • domain assumption Solute atoms are already segregated to grain boundaries in the ball-milled powders before DSC, so the observed DSC features reflect grain boundary phenomena rather than bulk segregation processes.
    Section 3.3: inferred from the absence of low-temperature exothermic peaks characteristic of solute diffusion to boundaries and from prior studies on these alloy systems; no direct atom-scale measurement of boundary segregation in the powders is provided.
  • domain assumption Excess vacancies generated during rapid quenching follow the equilibrium vacancy expression (Eq. 2) with Q_f = 0.7 eV, and their condensation drives the observed pore and void formation.
    Section 3.6: Q_f from Ref 101 and vacancy model from Ref 100; the pore mechanism is supported by quench-rate-dependent comparisons but not directly visualized at the vacancy level.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Kinetics of Amorphous Defect Phases Measured Through Ultrafast Nanocalorimetry." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KNGIFOLS

@misc{pith2026250612179,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Kinetics of Amorphous Defect Phases Measured Through Ultrafast Nanocalorimetry},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KNGIFOLS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.12179}
}
read the original abstract

Recognition of the role of extended defects on local phase transitions has led to the conceptualization of the defect phase, localized thermodynamically stable interfacial states that have since been applied in a myriad of material systems to realize significant enhancements in material properties. Here, we explore the kinetics of grain boundary confined amorphous defect phases, utilizing the high temperature and scanning rates afforded by ultrafast differential scanning calorimetry to apply targeted annealing/quenching treatments at high rates capable of capturing the kinetic behavior. Four Al-based nanocrystalline alloys, including two binary systems, Al-Ni and Al-Y, and two ternary systems, Al-Mg-Y and Al-Ni-Y, are selected to probe the materials design space (enthalpy of mixing, enthalpy of segregation, chemical complexity) for amorphous defect phase formation and stability, with correlative transmission electron microscopy applied to link phase evolution and grain stability to nanocalorimetry signatures. A series of targeted isothermal annealing heat treatments is utilized to construct a Time-Temperature-Transformation curve for the Al-Ni system, from which a critical cooling rate of 2,400 {\deg}C/s was determined for the grain boundary confined disordered-to-ordered transition. Finally, a thermal profile consisting of 1,000 repeated annealing sequences was created to explore the recovery of the amorphous defect phase following sequential annealing treatments, with results indicating remarkable microstructural stability after annealing at temperatures above 90% of the melting temperature. This work contributes to a deeper understanding of grain boundary localized thermodynamics and kinetics, with potential implications for the design and optimization of advanced materials with enhanced stability and performance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.12179 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) A visual schematic of amorphous defect phase formation. At some temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) 3D plot of binary Al alloys as a function of atomic radius mismatch, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. CALPHAD generated pseudo-binary phase diagrams created from vertical cross [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) A single heating curve to illustrate the additional endothermic behavior associated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Normalized DSC heat flow curves for seven di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) STEM-DF micrograph of as-milled powders of Al-Y. (b) Selected area di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) STEM-DF micrograph of Al-Y following a single ultrafast DSC annealing run at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: High resolution TEM micrographs of amorphous defect phases in bulk consolidated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (a) Isothermal traces at various temperatures between 520 - 580 °C for Al-Ni. A trace [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Normalized and background-subtracted DSC heat flow curves across 1000 repeated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: (a) STEM-DF micrograph of Al-Ni after 100 iterations of the thermal cycling sequence [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: (a) STEM-DF micrograph of as-milled Al-Ni. (a) STEM-DF micrograph of Al-Ni after [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_12.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

116 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages

  1. [94]

    M. D. Grapes, M. K. Santala, G. H. Campbell, D. A. LaVan, T. P. Weihs, A detailed study of the al3ni formation reaction using nanocalorimetry, Ther- mochimica Acta 658 (2017) 72–83. doi:10.1016/j.tca.2017.10.018

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tca.2017.10.018 2017

  2. [1]

    Suryanarayana, Nanocrystalline materials, International Materials Re- views 40 (2) (1995) 41–64

    C. Suryanarayana, Nanocrystalline materials, International Materials Re- views 40 (2) (1995) 41–64. doi:10.1179/imr.1995.40.2.41

    work page doi:10.1179/imr.1995.40.2.41 1995

  3. [2]

    Kumar, H

    K. Kumar, H. Van Swygenhoven, S. Suresh, Mechanical behavior of nanocrystalline metals and alloys, Acta Materialia 51 (19) (2003) 5743–

    2003

  4. [3]

    Meyers, A

    M. Meyers, A. Mishra, D. Benson, Mechanical properties of nanocrys- talline materials, Progress in Materials Science 51 (4) (2006) 427–556. doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.08.003

    doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.08.003 2006

  5. [4]

    N. M. Heckman, S. M. Foiles, C. J. O’Brien, M. Chandross, C. M. Barr, N. Argibay, K. Hattar, P. Lu, D. P. Adams, B. L. Boyce, New nanoscale toughening mechanisms mitigate embrittlement in binary nanocrystalline alloys, Nanoscale 10 (2018) 21231–21243. doi:10.1039/C8NR06419A

    work page doi:10.1039/c8nr06419a 2018

  6. [5]

    Zhang, Z

    Y . Zhang, Z. Han, K. Wang, K. Lu, Friction and wear behaviors of nanocrystalline surface layer of pure copper, Wear 260 (9) (2006) 942–948. doi:10.1016/j.wear.2005.06.010

    work page doi:10.1016/j.wear.2005.06.010 2006

  7. [6]

    L. Liu, Y . Li, F. Wang, Electrochemical corrosion behavior of nanocrys- 46 talline materials - a review, Journal of Materials Science & Technology 26 (1) (2010) 1–14. doi:10.1016/S1005-0302(10)60001-1

    work page doi:10.1016/s1005-0302(10)60001-1 2010

  8. [7]

    Beyerlein, A

    I. Beyerlein, A. Caro, M. Demkowicz, N. Mara, A. Misra, B. Uberuaga, Radiation damage tolerant nanomaterials, Materials Today 16 (11) (2013) 443–449. doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2013.10.019

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2013.10.019 2013

Show all 116 references
  1. [8]

    Cheng, W

    G. Cheng, W. Xu, Y . Wang, A. Misra, Y . Zhu, Grain size effect on radia- tion tolerance of nanocrystalline mo, Scripta Materialia 123 (2016) 90–94. doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.06.007

    2016 doi

  2. [9]

    Korte-Kerzel, T

    S. Korte-Kerzel, T. Hickel, L. Huber, D. Raabe, S. Sandl ¨obes-Haut, M. Todorova, J. Neugebauer, Defect phases – thermodynamics and impact on material properties, International Materials Reviews 67 (1) (2022) 89–

    2022

  3. [10]

    Tehranchi, S

    A. Tehranchi, S. Zhang, A. Zendegani, C. Scheu, T. Hickel, J. Neuge- bauer, Metastable defect phase diagrams as roadmap to tailor chem- ically driven defect formation, Acta Materialia 277 (2024) 120145. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2024.120145

    2024

  4. [11]

    T. P. Matson, C. A. Schuh, Phase and defect diagrams based on spectral grain boundary segregation: A regular solution approach, Acta Materialia 265 (2024) 119584. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2023.119584

    2024

  5. [12]

    X. Shi, J. Luo, Developing grain boundary diagrams as a materials science tool: A case study of nickel-doped molybdenum, Phys. Rev. B 84 (2011) 014105. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.84.014105. 47

    2011 doi

  6. [13]

    S. J. Dillon, M. Tang, W. C. Carter, M. P. Harmer, Complexion: A new con- cept for kinetic engineering in materials science, Acta Materialia 55 (18) (2007) 6208–6218. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2007.07.029

    2007 doi

  7. [14]

    Kirchheim, Grain coarsening inhibited by solute segregation, Acta Ma- terialia 50 (2) (2002) 413–419

    R. Kirchheim, Grain coarsening inhibited by solute segregation, Acta Ma- terialia 50 (2) (2002) 413–419. doi:10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00338-X

    2002 doi

  8. [15]

    J. W. Gibbs, On the equilibrium of heterogeneous substances, American Journal of Science 3 (96) (1878) 441–458

  9. [16]

    Frolov, Y

    T. Frolov, Y . Mishin, Phases, phase equilibria, and phase rules in low- dimensional systems, The Journal of Chemical Physics 143 (4) (2015) 044706. doi:10.1063/1.4927414

    2015 doi

  10. [17]

    P. R. Cantwell, T. Frolov, T. J. Rupert, A. R. Krause, C. J. Marvel, G. S. Rohrer, J. M. Rickman, M. P. Harmer, Grain boundary complexion transi- tions, Annual Review of Materials Research 50 (V olume 50, 2020) (2020) 465–492. doi:10.1146/annurev-matsci-081619-114055

    2020 doi

  11. [18]

    P. R. Cantwell, M. Tang, S. J. Dillon, J. Luo, G. S. Rohrer, M. P. Harmer, Grain boundary complexions, Acta Materialia 62 (2014) 1–48. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2013.07.037

    2014 doi

  12. [19]

    Howard, W

    H. Howard, W. Cunningham, A. Genc, B. Rhodes, B. Merle, T. Ru- pert, D. Gianola, Chemically ordered dislocation defect phases as a new strengthening pathway in ni–al alloys, Acta Materialia 289 (2025) 120887. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2025.120887. 48

    2025

  13. [20]

    Turlo, T

    V . Turlo, T. J. Rupert, Prediction of a wide variety of linear complex- ions in face centered cubic alloys, Acta Materialia 185 (2020) 129–141. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2019.11.069

    2020 doi

  14. [21]

    Kuzmina, M

    M. Kuzmina, M. Herbig, D. Ponge, S. Sandl ¨obes, D. Raabe, Linear com- plexions: Confined chemical and structural states at dislocations, Science 349 (6252) (2015) 1080–1083. doi:10.1126/science.aab2633

    2015 doi

  15. [22]

    Singh, V

    D. Singh, V . Turlo, D. S. Gianola, T. J. Rupert, Linear complexions directly modify dislocation motion in face-centered cubic alloys, Materials Science and Engineering: A 870 (2023) 144875. doi:10.1016 /j.msea.2023.144875

    2023

  16. [23]

    T. M. Smith, B. D. Esser, B. Good, M. Hooshmand, G. B. Viswanathan, C. M. F. Rae, M. Ghazisaeidi, D. W. McComb, M. J. Mills, Segregation and phase transformations along superlattice intrinsic stacking faults in ni- based superalloys, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A ...

    2018

  17. [24]

    M. S. Titus, R. K. Rhein, P. B. Wells, P. C. Dodge, G. B. Viswanathan, M. J. Mills, A. Van der Ven, T. M. Pollock, Solute segregation and deviation from bulk thermodynamics at nanoscale crystalline defects, Science advances 2 (12) (2016) e1601796

    2016

  18. [25]

    Frolov, M

    T. Frolov, M. Asta, Y . Mishin, Segregation-induced phase trans- formations in grain boundaries, Phys. Rev. B 92 (2015) 020103. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.92.020103

    2015 doi

  19. [26]

    Frolov, D

    T. Frolov, D. L. Olmsted, M. Asta, Y . Mishin, Structural phase transfor- 49 mations in metallic grain boundaries, Nature communications 4 (1) (2013) 1899

    2013

  20. [27]

    Mishin, M

    Y . Mishin, M. Asta, J. Li, Atomistic modeling of interfaces and their impact on microstructure and properties, Acta Materialia 58 (4) (2010) 1117–1151. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2009.10.049

    2010 doi

  21. [28]

    J. D. Schuler, T. J. Rupert, Materials selection rules for amorphous com- plexion formation in binary metallic alloys, Acta Materialia 140 (2017) 196–205. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2017.08.042

    2017 doi

  22. [29]

    T. Lei, E. C. Hessong, D. S. Gianola, T. J. Rupert, Binary nanocrystalline alloys with strong glass forming interfacial regions: Complexion stability, segregation competition, and di ffusion pathways, Materials Characteriza- tion 206 (2023) 113415. doi:10.1016/j.matchar.2023.113415

    2023

  23. [30]

    J. Luo, V . K. Gupta, D. H. Yoon, I. Meyer, H. M., Segregation-induced grain boundary premelting in nickel-doped tungsten, Applied Physics Let- ters 87 (23) (2005) 231902. doi:10.1063/1.2138796

    2005 doi

  24. [31]

    Luo, Liquid-like interface complexion: From activated sintering to grain boundary diagrams, Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science 12 (5) (2008) 81–88

    J. Luo, Liquid-like interface complexion: From activated sintering to grain boundary diagrams, Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science 12 (5) (2008) 81–88. doi:10.1016/j.cossms.2008.12.001

    2008 doi

  25. [32]

    F. Li, T. Liu, J. Zhang, S. Shuang, Q. Wang, A. Wang, J. Wang, Y . Yang, Amorphous–nanocrystalline alloys: fabrication, proper- ties, and applications, Materials Today Advances 4 (2019) 100027. doi:10.1016/j.mtadv.2019.100027. 50

    2019

  26. [33]

    Williams, Y

    P. Williams, Y . Mishin, Thermodynamics of grain boundary premelting in alloys. ii. atomistic simulation, Acta Materialia 57 (13) (2009) 3786–3794

    2009

  27. [34]

    W. D. Kaplan, Y . Kauffmann, Structural order in liquids induced by inter- faces with crystals, Annual Review of Materials Research 36 (V olume 36,

  28. [35]

    Mellenthin, A

    J. Mellenthin, A. Karma, M. Plapp, Phase-field crystal study of grain-boundary premelting, Phys. Rev. B 78 (2008) 184110. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.78.184110

    2008 doi

  29. [36]

    M. Tang, W. C. Carter, R. M. Cannon, Grain boundary tran- sitions in binary alloys, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 075502. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.075502

    2006 doi

  30. [37]

    Straumal, B

    B. Straumal, B. Baretzky, Grain boundary phase transitions and their influ- ence on properties of polycrystals, Interface Science 12 (2004) 147–155

    2004

  31. [38]

    Kikuchi, J

    R. Kikuchi, J. W. Cahn, Grain-boundary melting transition in a two- dimensional lattice-gas model, Physical Review B 21 (5) (1980) 1893

    1980

  32. [39]

    Raabe, M

    D. Raabe, M. Herbig, S. Sandl ¨obes, Y . Li, D. Tytko, M. Kuzmina, D. Ponge, P.-P. Choi, Grain boundary segregation engineering in metal- lic alloys: A pathway to the design of interfaces, Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science 18 (4) (2014) 253–261

    2014

  33. [40]

    J. D. Schuler, O. K. Donaldson, T. J. Rupert, Amorphous complexions en- able a new region of high temperature stability in nanocrystalline ni-w, Scripta Materialia 154 (2018) 49–53. 51

    2018

  34. [41]

    G. H. Balbus, J. Kappacher, D. J. Sprouster, F. Wang, J. Shin, Y . M. Eggeler, T. J. Rupert, J. R. Trelewicz, D. Kiener, V . Maier-Kiener, D. S. Gi- anola, Disordered interfaces enable high temperature thermal stability and strength in a nanocrystalline aluminum alloy, Acta Ma...

    2021

  35. [42]

    J. Shin, F. Wang, G. H. Balbus, T. Lei, T. J. Rupert, D. S. Gianola, Optimiz- ing thermal stability and mechanical behavior in segregation-engineered nanocrystalline al–ni–ce alloys: A combinatorial study, Journal of Materi- als Research 37 (18) (2022) 3083–3098

    2022

  36. [43]

    T. Lei, J. Shin, D. S. Gianola, T. J. Rupert, Bulk nanocrystalline al al- loys with hierarchical reinforcement structures via grain boundary seg- regation and complexion formation, Acta Materialia 221 (2021) 117394. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117394

    2021

  37. [44]

    T. Lei, M. Xu, J. Shin, D. S. Gianola, T. J. Rupert, Growth and structural transitions of core-shell nanorods in nanocrystalline al-ni-y, Scripta Mate- rialia 211 (2022) 114502. doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2022.114502

    2022

  38. [45]

    C. M. Grigorian, T. J. Rupert, Thick amorphous complexion formation and extreme thermal stability in ternary nanocrystalline cu-zr-hf alloys, Acta Materialia 179 (2019) 172–182

    2019

  39. [46]

    C. M. Grigorian, T. J. Rupert, Critical cooling rates for amorphous-to- ordered complexion transitions in cu-rich nanocrystalline alloys, Acta Ma- terialia 206 (2021) 116650. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2021.116650. 52

    2021

  40. [47]

    Takeuchi, A

    A. Takeuchi, A. Inoue, Quantitative evaluation of critical cooling rate for metallic glasses, Materials Science and Engineering: A 304 (2001) 446– 451

    2001

  41. [48]

    C. M. Grigorian, T. J. Rupert, Multi-principal element grain boundaries: Stabilizing nanocrystalline grains with thick amorphous complexions, Jour- nal of Materials Research (2022) 1–13

    2022

  42. [49]

    Khalajhedayati, Z

    A. Khalajhedayati, Z. Pan, T. J. Rupert, Manipulating the interfacial struc- ture of nanomaterials to achieve a unique combination of strength and duc- tility, Nature communications 7 (1) (2016) 10802

    2016

  43. [50]

    W. S. Cunningham, J. Shin, T. Lei, T. J. Rupert, D. S. Gianola, High- throughput assessment of the microstructural stability of segregation- engineered nanocrystalline al-ni-y alloys, Materialia 32 (2023) 101940. doi:10.1016/j.mtla.2023.101940

    2023

  44. [51]

    Z. Yan, Z. Liu, B. Yao, Q. An, R. Zhang, S. Zheng, E ffect of amorphous complexions on plastic deformation of nanolayered composites, Scripta Materialia 231 (2023) 115470. doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2023.115470

    2023

  45. [52]

    J. D. Schuler, C. M. Grigorian, C. M. Barr, B. L. Boyce, K. Hat- tar, T. J. Rupert, Amorphous intergranular films mitigate radiation damage in nanocrystalline cu-zr, Acta Materialia 186 (2020) 341–354. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2019.12.048

    2020 doi

  46. [53]

    J. E. Ludy, T. J. Rupert, Amorphous intergranular films act as ultra-efficient point defect sinks during collision cascades, Scripta Materialia 110 (2016) 37–40. 53

    2016

  47. [54]

    Aksoy, P

    D. Aksoy, P. Cao, J. R. Trelewicz, J. P. Wharry, T. J. Rupert, Enhanced radiation damage tolerance of amorphous interphase and grain boundary complexions in cu-ta, JOM (2024) 1–14

    2024

  48. [55]

    Y . Wang, M. Ostrowska, G. Cacciamani, Thermodynamic model- ing of selected ternary systems containing y and calphad simu- lation of conicraly metallic coatings, Calphad 72 (2021) 102214. doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2020.102214

    2021

  49. [56]

    Y . Chen, J. Wang, W. Zheng, Q. Li, M. Yu, T. Ying, X. Zeng, Calphad-guided design of mg-y-al alloy with improved strength and duc- tility via regulating the lpso phase, Acta Materialia 263 (2024) 119521. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2023.119521

    2024

  50. [57]

    H. A. Murdoch, C. A. Schuh, Estimation of grain boundary segregation enthalpy and its role in stable nanocrystalline alloy design, Journal of Ma- terials Research 28 (16) (2013) 2154–2163

    2013

  51. [58]

    Inoue, Stabilization of metallic supercooled liquid and bulk amor- phous alloys, Acta Materialia 48 (1) (2000) 279–306

    A. Inoue, Stabilization of metallic supercooled liquid and bulk amor- phous alloys, Acta Materialia 48 (1) (2000) 279–306. doi:10.1016 /S1359- 6454(99)00300-6

    2000

  52. [59]

    M. A. Atwater, K. A. Darling, A visual library of stability in binary metallic systems: the stabilization of nanocrystalline grain size by solute addition: part 1, Army Research Lab Aberdeen Proving Ground MD Weapons and Materials Research Directorate (2012)

    2012

  53. [60]

    Egami, Y

    T. Egami, Y . Waseda, Atomic size e ffect on the formability of metal- 54 lic glasses, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 64 (1) (1984) 113–134. doi:10.1016/0022-3093(84)90210-2

    1984 doi

  54. [61]

    Cheng, E

    Y . Cheng, E. Ma, Atomic-level structure and structure–property relation- ship in metallic glasses, Progress in Materials Science 56 (4) (2011) 379–

    2011

  55. [62]

    Okamoto, Al-ni (aluminum-nickel), Journal of Phase Equilibria and dif- fusion 25 (4) (2004) 394

    H. Okamoto, Al-ni (aluminum-nickel), Journal of Phase Equilibria and dif- fusion 25 (4) (2004) 394

    2004

  56. [63]

    Okamoto, Al-mg (aluminum-magnesium), Journal of Phase Equilibria and Diffusion 19 (6) (1998) 598

    H. Okamoto, Al-mg (aluminum-magnesium), Journal of Phase Equilibria and Diffusion 19 (6) (1998) 598

    1998

  57. [64]

    S. Liu, Y . Du, H. Xu, C. He, J. C. Schuster, Experimental investigation of the al-y phase diagram, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 414 (1) (2006) 60–65. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2005.06.078

    2006 doi

  58. [65]

    Devaraj, W

    A. Devaraj, W. Wang, R. Vemuri, L. Kovarik, X. Jiang, M. Bowden, J. Trelewicz, S. Mathaudhu, A. Rohatgi, Grain boundary segregation and intermetallic precipitation in coarsening resistant nanocrystalline alu- minum alloys, Acta Materialia 165 (2019) 698–708

    2019

  59. [66]

    Vasiliev, M

    A. Vasiliev, M. Aindow, M. Blackburn, T. Watson, Phase stability and microstructure in devitrified al-rich al–y–ni alloys, Intermetallics 12 (4) (2004) 349–362

    2004

  60. [67]

    Raggio, G

    R. Raggio, G. Borzone, R. Ferro, The al-rich region in the y–ni–al system: microstructures and phase equilibria, Intermetallics 8 (3) (2000) 247–257. doi:10.1016/S0966-9795(99)00100-4. 55

    2000 doi

  61. [68]

    T. Mika, B. Kotur, Phase equlibria in the Y , Gd–ni–al ternary systems in the 65-100 at.% al range at 773 k: a reinvestigation, Chemistry of Metals and Alloys 3 (2010)

    2010

  62. [69]

    Zarechnyuk, M

    O. Zarechnyuk, M. Drits, R. Rykhal, V . Kinzhibalo, Examination of the mg-al-y system (0-33 at% y) at 400◦ c, Metall 5 (1980) 242–244

    1980

  63. [70]

    X. Li, M. Starink, Dsc study on phase transitions and their correlation with properties of overaged al-zn-mg-cu alloys, Journal of Materials Engineer- ing and Performance 21 (2012) 977–984

    2012

  64. [71]

    L. Lasa, J. Rodriguez-Ibabe, Characterization of the dissolution of the al2cu phase in two al–si–cu–mg casting alloys using calorimetry, Materials Char- acterization 48 (5) (2002) 371–378. doi:10.1016/S1044-5803(02)00283-8

    2002 doi

  65. [72]

    Z. Chen, K. Liu, E. Elgallad, F. Breton, X.-G. Chen, Di fferential scanning calorimetry fingerprints of various heat-treatment tempers of different alu- minum alloys, Metals 10 (6) (2020) 763

    2020

  66. [73]

    W. Shao, J. M. Guevara-Vela, A. Fern ´andez-Caballero, S. Liu, J. LLorca, Accurate prediction of the solid-state region of the ni-al phase diagram in- cluding configurational and vibrational entropy and magnetic effects, Acta Materialia 253 (2023) 118962. doi:10.1016/j.actamat...

    2023

  67. [74]

    Janovszky, M

    D. Janovszky, M. Sveda, A. Sycheva, F. Kristaly, F. Z´amborszky, T. Koziel, P. Bala, G. Czel, G. Kaptay, Amorphous alloys and di fferential scanning calorimetry (dsc), Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry (2022) 1– 17. 56

    2022

  68. [75]

    K. Laws, D. Miracle, M. Ferry, A predictive structural model for bulk metallic glasses, Nature communications 6 (1) (2015) 8123

    2015

  69. [76]

    Huang, F

    Z. Huang, F. Chen, Q. Shen, L. Zhang, T. J. Rupert, Combined ef- fects of nonmetallic impurities and planned metallic dopants on grain boundary energy and strength, Acta Materialia 166 (2019) 113–125. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2018.12.031

    2019 doi

  70. [77]

    Miller, P

    M. Miller, P. Liaw, Bulk metallic glasses: an overview, Springer Science & Business Media, 2007

    2007

  71. [78]

    Zhang, Y

    X. Zhang, Y . Wan, C. Chen, L. Zhang, The e ffect of solute elements co- segregation on grain boundary energy and the mechanical properties of aluminum by first-principles calculation, Nanomaterials 14 (22) (2024). doi:10.3390/nano14221803

    2024 doi

  72. [79]

    D. L. Olmsted, S. M. Foiles, E. A. Holm, Survey of computed grain bound- ary properties in face-centered cubic metals: I. grain boundary energy, Acta Materialia 57 (13) (2009) 3694–3703. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.007

    2009 doi

  73. [80]

    P. Garg, Z. Pan, V . Turlo, T. J. Rupert, Segregation competition and com- plexion coexistence within a polycrystalline grain boundary network, Acta Materialia 218 (2021) 117213. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117213

    2021

  74. [81]

    D. B. Bober, A. Khalajhedayati, M. Kumar, T. J. Rupert, Grain bound- ary character distributions in nanocrystalline metals produced by di fferent processing routes, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A 47 (2016) 1389–1403. 57

    2016

  75. [82]

    R. R. Vanfleet, J. Mochel, Thermodynamics of melting and freezing in small particles, Surface Science 341 (1) (1995) 40–50. doi:10.1016 /0039- 6028(95)00728-8

    1995

  76. [83]

    V . P. Skripov, V . P. Koverda, V . N. Skokov, Size e ffect on melting of small particles, physica status solidi (a) 66 (1) (1981) 109–118. doi:10.1002/pssa.2210660111

    1981 doi

  77. [84]

    D. B. Williams, C. B. Carter, The transmission electron microscope, Springer, 1996

    1996

  78. [85]

    Tiryakioglu, G

    M. Tiryakioglu, G. Totten, Quenching aluminum components in water: Problems and alternatives, in: Heat Treating: Proceedings of the 18 th Con- ference, October 12 th-15 th, 1998, p. 3

    1998

  79. [86]

    T. Duan, W. Kim, M. Gao, J. H. Perepezko, Crystallization of an under- cooled zn-based glass forming alloy, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 627 (2024) 122823. doi:10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2024.122823

    2024

  80. [87]

    Z. Yang, R. Al-Mukadam, M. Stolpe, M. Markl, J. Deubener, C. K ¨orner, Isothermal crystallization kinetics of an industrial-grade zr-based bulk metallic glass, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 573 (2021) 121145. doi:10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2021.121145

    2021

  81. [88]

    Pogatscher, P

    S. Pogatscher, P. J. Uggowitzer, J. F. L ¨offler, In-situ probing of metallic glass formation and crystallization upon heating and cooling via fast dif- ferential scanning calorimetry, Applied Physics Letters 104 (25) (2014) 251908. doi:10.1063/1.4884940. 58

    2014 doi

  82. [89]

    Neuber, M

    N. Neuber, M. Frey, O. Gross, J. Baller, I. Gallino, R. Busch, Ultrafast scan- ning calorimetry of newly developed au-ga bulk metallic glasses, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 32 (32) (2020) 324001

    2020

  83. [90]

    P. R. Cantwell, S. Ma, S. A. Bojarski, G. S. Rohrer, M. P. Harmer, Ex- panding time–temperature-transformation (ttt) diagrams to interfaces: A new approach for grain boundary engineering, Acta Materialia 106 (2016) 78–86. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2016.01.010

    2016 doi

  84. [91]

    Davies, Rapid quenching techniques and formation of metallic glasses, Rapidly quenched metals III 1 (1978) 1–21

    H. Davies, Rapid quenching techniques and formation of metallic glasses, Rapidly quenched metals III 1 (1978) 1–21

    1978

  85. [92]

    J. Liao, B. Yang, Y . Zhang, W. Lu, X. Gu, J. Wang, Evaluation of glass for- mation and critical casting diameter in al-based metallic glasses, Materials & Design 88 (2015) 222–226. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2015.08.138

    2015 doi

  86. [93]

    Inoue, Amorphous, nanoquasicrystalline and nanocrystalline alloys in al-based systems, Progress in Materials Science 43 (5) (1998) 365–520

    A. Inoue, Amorphous, nanoquasicrystalline and nanocrystalline alloys in al-based systems, Progress in Materials Science 43 (5) (1998) 365–520. doi:10.1016/S0079-6425(98)00005-X

    1998 doi

  87. [95]

    Jackson, M

    M. Jackson, M. Starink, R. Reed, Determination of the precipitation ki- netics of ni3al in the ni–al system using di fferential scanning calorime- try, Materials Science and Engineering: A 264 (1) (1999) 26–38. doi:10.1016/S0921-5093(98)01120-4. 59

    1999 doi

  88. [96]

    F. Yan, W. Xiong, E. Faierson, G. B. Olson, Characterization of nano-scale oxides in austenitic stainless steel processed by powder bed fusion, Scripta Materialia 155 (2018) 104–108

    2018

  89. [97]

    T. Horn, C. Rock, D. Kaoumi, I. Anderson, E. White, T. Prost, J. Rieken, S. Saptarshi, R. Schoell, M. DeJong, et al., Laser powder bed fusion addi- tive manufacturing of oxide dispersion strengthened steel using gas atom- ized reaction synthesis powder, Materials & Design 216 ...

    2022

  90. [98]

    A. N. Khludkova, K. V . Savitskii, Effect of quenching temperature on pore formation during the cyclic heat treatment of aluminum, Soviet Physics Journal 8 (1965) 19–22

    1965

  91. [99]

    F. J. Bradshaw, S. Pearson, Quenching vacancies in aluminium, The Philo- sophical Magazine: A Journal of Theoretical Experimental and Applied Physics 2 (16) (1957) 570–571. doi:10.1080/14786435708243848

    1957 doi

  92. [100]

    J. A. Wert, Vacancy concentrations in quenched binary alloys, Acta Metal- lurgica 28 (10) (1980) 1361–1373. doi:10.1016/0001-6160(80)90005-X

    1980 doi

  93. [101]

    Huang, M

    J. Huang, M. Li, J. Chen, Y . Cheng, Z. Lai, J. Hu, F. Zhou, N. Qu, Y . Liu, J. Zhu, Electronic structure and atomic migration of the fourth, fifth, and sixth period atoms in aluminum alloys: First principles calculation, Vac- uum 210 (2023) 111823. doi:10.1016/j.vacuum.2023.111823

    2023

  94. [102]

    Swalin, C

    R. Swalin, C. Yin, Thermal di ffusion of vacancies in aluminum, Acta Met- allurgica 15 (2) (1967) 245–248. doi:10.1016/0001-6160(67)90198-8

    1967 doi

  95. [103]

    326 (2020) 01001

    Banhart, John, Yang, Zi, Liu, Meng, Madanat, Mazen, Zhang, Xingpu, Guo, Qianning, Yan, Yong, R ¨ohsler, Andreas, Fricke, Konrad, Liang, 60 Zeqin, Leyvraz, David, Hoell, Armin, Gericke, Eike, Wendt, Robert, Liu, Chunhui, Exploring the hidden world of solute atoms, clusters and ...

    2020

  96. [104]

    Milkereit, M

    B. Milkereit, M. J. Starink, P. A. Rometsch, C. Schick, O. Kessler, Review of the quench sensitivity of aluminium alloys: analysis of the kinetics and nature of quench-induced precipitation, Materials 12 (24) (2019) 4083

    2019

  97. [105]

    Hardy, T

    H. Hardy, T. Heal, Report on precipitation, Progress in Metal Physics 5 (1954) 143–278. doi:10.1016/0502-8205(54)90006-4

    1954 doi

  98. [106]

    Lotter, U

    F. Lotter, U. Muehle, M. Elsayed, A. M. Ibrahim, T. Schubert, R. Krause-Rehberg, B. Kieback, T. E. M. Staab, Precipitation behav- ior in high-purity aluminium alloys with trace elements – the role of quenched-in vacancies, physica status solidi (a) 215 (24) (2018) 1800375. doi...

    2018 doi

  99. [107]

    Cahn, Surface segregation in metals and alloys (1979)

    J. Cahn, Surface segregation in metals and alloys (1979)

    1979

  100. [108]

    Weissm ¨uller, Alloy effects in nanostructures, Nanostructured Materials 3 (1-6) (1993) 261–272

    J. Weissm ¨uller, Alloy effects in nanostructures, Nanostructured Materials 3 (1-6) (1993) 261–272

    1993

  101. [109]

    Chookajorn, H

    T. Chookajorn, H. A. Murdoch, C. A. Schuh, Design of sta- ble nanocrystalline alloys, Science 337 (6097) (2012) 951–954. doi:10.1126/science.1224737

    2012 doi

  102. [110]

    W. S. Cunningham, S. T. J. Mascarenhas, J. S. Riano, W. Wang, S. Hwang, K. Hattar, A. M. Hodge, J. R. Trelewicz, Unraveling thermodynamic and 61 kinetic contributions to the stability of doped nanocrystalline alloys us- ing nanometallic multilayers, Advanced Materials 34 (27) ...

    2022 doi

  103. [111]

    Darling, A

    K. Darling, A. Roberts, Y . Mishin, S. Mathaudhu, L. Kecskes, Grain size stabilization of nanocrystalline copper at high temperatures by alloying with tantalum, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 573 (2013) 142–150. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.03.177

    2013 doi

  104. [112]

    N. Zhou, T. Hu, J. Luo, Grain boundary complexions in multicomponent al- loys: Challenges and opportunities, Current Opinion in Solid State and Ma- terials Science 20 (5) (2016) 268–277. doi:10.1016/j.cossms.2016.05.001. 62

    2016 doi

  105. [117]

    doi:10.1080/09506608.2021.1930734

    2021

  106. [473]

    doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2010.12.002

    2010 doi

  107. [2006]

    doi:10.1146/annurev.matsci.36.020105.104035

    (2006) 1–48. doi:10.1146/annurev.matsci.36.020105.104035

    2006

  108. [5774]

    doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2003.08.032

    2003 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.