Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 66 references

Real-Time Per-Garment Virtual Try-On with Temporal Consistency for Loose-Fitting Garments

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A garment-invariant pose representation plus a recurrent synthesis network lets per-garment virtual try-on handle loose clothing in real time while suppressing frame-to-frame jitter.

desk verdict A coherent per-garment try-on system with a clever garment-invariant body-map estimator and recurrent synthesis, but the temporal-consistency claim is under-supported by the quantitative evidence. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.12348 v3 pith:5P3IIHIQ submitted 2025-06-14 cs.GR cs.CV

Zaiqiang Wu , I-Chao Shen , Takeo Igarashi This is my paper
classification cs.GRcs.CV
keywords virtualtry-onloose-fittinggarmentsgarment-invariantrepresentationbodysemanticmapstemporalconsistencyrecurrentsynthesisConvLSTMreal-time
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that per-garment virtual try-on for loose-fitting clothing can be made visually credible and temporally stable by replacing the usual DensePose body map with a two-stage semantic-map estimator and by making the garment synthesizer recurrent. Existing per-garment methods train on tight-fitting data and then fail when the target garment hides the body contour; the proposed representation is designed to be robust to that occlusion. The paper also claims that adding a lightweight convolutional recurrent module keeps successive frames coherent without sacrificing real-time speed, reporting about 10.5 frames per second. If correct, this removes two known failure modes of per-garment try-on and makes live virtual try-on for loose garments practical.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the garment-invariant representation, a six-channel image formed by concatenating a rendered SMPL mesh with a grid-pattern texture and body shape parameters fixed to zero with a three-channel RGB encoding of joint heatmaps that excludes the hip and knee joints. Its job is to carry enough pose information to reconstruct the hidden body semantic map while being insensitive to whether the person is photographed in tight or loose clothing. The second mechanism is the recurrent synthesis block, a lightweight ConvLSTM inserted into the pix2pixHD generator, which carries cell and hidden states across frames. Together they support the paper's two fixes: reliable semantic-map estimation for dataset generation and frame-to-frame coherence during inference.

What would settle it

A direct test would compare the garment-invariant representation for the same person in the same pose wearing a tight garment versus each loose garment; if the remaining joint heatmaps or the rendered SMPL image shift by more than a few pixels in the loose condition, the invariance assumption fails. A second check would measure the BodyMap network's semantic-map output against manually annotated or depth-sensor ground truth under loose garments, rather than relying on the qualitative images in the paper's Figure 15.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The core claim is that a per-garment virtual try-on system can handle loose-fitting garments if it separates the problem into two learned mappings. First, a per-person BodyMap network translates a garment-invariant representation characterized by a rendered SMPL virtual measurement garment with body shape parameters zeroed, concatenated with joint heatmaps from which hip and knee joints have been removed, into a simplified human body semantic map. This map is robust enough to train a garment-specific synthesis network from footage of a person wearing the loose garment. Second, a recurrent garment synthesis network inserts a ConvLSTM into a pix2pixHD-style generator so that synthesis at each frame depends on previous cell and hidden states, enforcing temporal coherence. The paper reports that this pipeline gives better image quality and temporal consistency than general image-based and video-based try-on methods and than the prior per-garment baseline, with temporal coherence measured by Video FID and image quality by KID and FID.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the six-channel pose representation is truly invariant to what a person is wearing; the paper supports this only with a qualitative ablation, not a measured invariance test. If the pose estimator drifts when loose fabric hides the body, the BodyMap network receives inputs outside its training distribution and the estimated semantic maps degrade.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Per-garment datasets for loose garments can be generated from ordinary video of one human model without DensePose failures by using the BodyMap network to estimate semantic maps.
  • Try-on results for loose garments become temporally stable, with lower Video FID than per-frame baselines, reducing jitter at hems and sleeves.
  • Inference remains real-time at about 10.5 frames per second and runs with a constant memory footprint on input sequences of arbitrary length because the recurrent state is fixed-size.
  • The trained ReGarSyn network generalizes to unseen body shapes despite being trained on a single human model.
  • The expensive garment-invariant representation is needed only while building per-garment training data; at inference the BodyMap network runs once per person and DensePose is still used for tight-clothed users.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the invariance claim holds quantitatively, the same representation could enable body semantic estimation for users wearing loose clothing during inference, removing the tight-fitting-garment assumption that the paper lists as a limitation.
  • The fixed-size recurrent state suggests the method could run as an online streaming loop with bounded latency, extending beyond pre-recorded clips to live camera try-on.
  • A direct numerical test of invariance, measuring how much the remaining joint heatmaps shift between tight and loose versions of the same pose, would turn the qualitative ablation into a predictive failure analysis.
  • Because the per-person BodyMap network can be reused across all garments worn by the same model, the framework points naturally toward per-garment-type training to cut the cost of collecting a dedicated dataset for every individual garment.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a per-garment virtual try-on method for loose-fitting garments. It introduces a 'garment-invariant representation' that concatenates a rendered SMPL mesh with zeroed body-shape parameters (a virtual measurement garment) and grouped joint heatmaps with hip/knee joints removed. This representation is mapped to a simplified DensePose-style semantic map by a per-person BodyMap network, which is then used to generate per-garment training data for a recurrent garment synthesis network (pix2pixHD extended with a ConvLSTM). At inference, the user wears a tight-fitting garment, from which the virtual measurement garment and a DensePose semantic map are extracted and fed into the recurrent network, producing temporally coherent try-on results at about 10.5 fps on an RTX 4090. The paper reports qualitative and quantitative comparisons against OOTDiffusion, ViViD, and the authors' prior method [57], along with ablation studies of the garment-invariant representation and the ConvLSTM module.

Significance. If the claimed performance were fully established, this would be a practical contribution to per-garment virtual try-on: it addresses a known weakness of prior per-garment methods on loose-fitting garments and adds temporal consistency in a lightweight, real-time architecture. The idea of using a body representation that is relatively insensitive to garment shape is well motivated, and the ablations comparing DensePose, different heatmap variants, the virtual measurement garment, and their combination are informative. The paper is clearly written, and the limitations are discussed honestly. However, the quantitative evidence for the central claims—particularly temporal superiority—is currently weak, and the invariance of the proposed representation is not directly measured. The contribution is therefore plausible but not yet convincingly demonstrated.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 4.3, Table 1; Section 4.6] The central temporal-consistency claim is not quantitatively established. VFID is computed on videos that the authors state are 'not strictly synchronized,' and no error bars, confidence intervals, or significance tests are reported. In Table 1, the VFID improvements of 'Ours' over 'Baseline [57]' are 0.016, 0.003, 0.012, and 0.012 across the four garments, which are small relative to typical VFID variability. VFID is a clip-level distributional metric based on I3D features and does not directly penalize frame-to-frame jitter; a video with strong jitter can have feature statistics close to a smooth reference. The only ConvLSTM ablation (Section 4.6, Figure 16) is a qualitative difference map. The authors should report a direct temporal-coherence metric on synchronized sequences, such as mean absolute difference or LPIPS between consecutive frames, a temporal warping error, or a user study, together with variance estimates, and should clarify why the per-frame loss in Eq. (4), which contains no explicit temporal term, is expected to enforce coherence.
  2. [Section 3.2, Figure 15] The paper's central assumption that the proposed representation is garment-invariant is not directly tested. Figure 5 shows that joint positions and confidence scores for hips and knees shift with garment type, motivating their removal, but no quantitative evaluation compares the extracted representation for the same person in tight-fitting versus loose-fitting garments under matched poses, nor measures downstream BodyMap accuracy. Since BEV pose estimation, like DensePose, may degrade when the body is occluded by loose fabric, the BodyMap network could receive inputs from a different distribution than its training data. The qualitative ablation in Figure 15 is insufficient to support the invariance claim, and the paper explicitly acknowledges in Section 4.5 that no quantitative evaluation of semantic-map accuracy is provided.
  3. [Section 3.6] The inference pipeline does not specify whether the body-shape parameters beta are fixed to zero when extracting the virtual measurement garment I_vm from the user's input frame. In Section 3.2, beta is fixed to zero for the garment-invariant representation used to train the BodyMap network and to generate per-garment datasets. If the same zero-beta I_vm is used at inference, this should be stated explicitly; if not, the I_vm component of the hybrid representation at inference has a different distribution from the training data, recreating the very mismatch the method aims to avoid. In either case, the effect of beta on the hybrid representation and on generalization to unseen body shapes needs to be discussed and, ideally, tested.
  4. [Section 4.1, Table 1, Abstract] The comparison with OOTDiffusion and ViViD is acknowledged to be unfair because these methods cannot be retrained on the per-garment datasets; the large metric gaps in Table 1 therefore mostly show that off-the-shelf universal models underperform on rarely seen garment types. For the closest baseline [57], the image-quality results are mixed: in Table 1, 'Ours' has slightly worse KID and FID than 'Baseline' for the dress (0.073 vs 0.071 and 67.26 vs 66.75) and slightly worse FID for the hanbok (27.01 vs 26.92). Thus the abstract's claim that the method 'outperforms existing approaches in both image quality and temporal coherence' is stronger than the evidence currently supports. Please qualify the claim and, if possible, add a fairer comparison or a statistical significance analysis.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 1, Table 2] The introduction states 'approximately 10 frames per second on a standard PC,' but the frame rates in Table 2 are measured on an NVIDIA RTX 4090, which is not a typical 'standard PC' GPU. Please rephrase, or report performance on a more representative device.
  2. [Section 4.3, Table 1] The text says the baseline 'occasionally surpasses our method in certain image quality metrics,' but Table 1 also shows that 'Ours w/o ConvLSTM' sometimes beats 'Ours' (e.g., FID for hanbok and dress). Clarify whether the recurrent module is intended to trade a small amount of image quality for temporal consistency, and if so state this trade-off explicitly.
  3. [Section 4.5] The ablation study on the garment-invariant representation is entirely qualitative. Consider reporting a proxy quantitative metric, such as the accuracy of the estimated semantic map on tight-fitting frames of the same person where DensePose can serve as a reference, or a measure of body-part detection rate under loose garments.
  4. [Section 2.2] Several claims about high memory usage and dataset bias in image-based virtual try-on methods are not substantiated with specific citations. Please add references or soften these statements.
  5. [Figure 3] The caption contains the typo 'ReGarSynt' instead of 'ReGarSyn'. Please correct it.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the pipeline is an empirical system compared against external baselines, with self-citations used only as components.

full rationale

No equation-level or definition-level circularity is present. The core claim is an empirical system comparison: Sections 3.2–3.6 construct a garment-invariant representation from BEV SMPL meshes and Sapiens joint heatmaps, train a per-person BodyMap network on paired tight-fitting data, and train a ReGarSyn network on per-garment data; none of these steps predicts a quantity that is an input to the same step by construction. The representation is a hand-designed input, not a derived output. The method is evaluated against external baselines (OOTDiffusion, ViViD) in addition to the authors' prior baseline [57], so the central claim does not reduce to a self-citation. References [57] and [58] supply dataset-collection and virtual-measurement-garment components, but they are ordinary dependencies, not load-bearing proofs of the present results; no uniqueness theorem or hidden ansatz is imported through a citation. The invariance of the garment-invariant representation is asserted and only qualitatively ablated (Figure 15), and VFID is computed on videos that are explicitly not strictly synchronized (Section 4.3), but these are evidential limitations, not circular reductions: the output images are not equal to the input representations by definition. Section 5 acknowledges the transient-dynamics and sizing limitations. Therefore the derivation chain is self-contained and no circular step is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on a set of unquantified domain assumptions about pose estimation under occlusion, the transferability of a per-person network across garment types, and the validity of distribution-based evaluation metrics. The paper introduces one hand-chosen constant (zeroed SMPL shape) and one new conceptual representation whose invariance is not independently measured.

free parameters (1)
  • SMPL body shape parameters beta = 0 (zero vector, fixed by hand)
    The paper sets all body shape parameters to zero to reduce garment sensitivity of the rendered virtual measurement garment. This is a manual modeling choice that the central invariance claim depends on.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The 3D pose estimator BEV produces accurate SMPL pose even when the body is covered by loose-fitting garments.
    The garment-invariant representation includes a rendered SMPL mesh from BEV. If pose estimation degrades under occlusion by loose fabric, the representation is not actually garment-invariant. This is asserted in Section 3.2 without a numerical invariance test.
  • domain assumption Removing hip and knee joint heatmaps makes the remaining joint representation sufficiently garment-invariant.
    The paper states joint estimation is not entirely garment-invariant and excludes hips and knees, but does not quantitatively validate that the remaining joints are stable across tight and loose garments. Section 3.2.
  • domain assumption A per-person BodyMap network trained on a tight-fitting garment video generalizes to the same person in loose-fitting garments.
    The BodyMap network is trained on tight-fitting images and applied to loose-fitting images of the same person. This domain transfer is central to the dataset generation pipeline and is validated only qualitatively in Section 4.5.
  • domain assumption FID, KID, and VFID computed between unsynchronized videos of the same person are valid proxies for try-on image quality and temporal consistency.
    The quantitative evaluation compares the generated video to a real video of the same person with similar but not synchronized motion. The paper assumes these distribution-based metrics reflect the intended visual and temporal qualities. Section 4.3.
invented entities (1)
  • Garment-invariant representation (I_gi), a six-channel concatenation of a rendered virtual measurement garment and three grouped joint heatmaps.
    purpose: To replace DensePose human body semantic maps for robust body map estimation under loose-fitting garments.
    The paper asserts the representation is garment-invariant but provides no external falsifiable measure of that invariance. The only supporting evidence is the qualitative ablation in Figure 15 and the overall system performance, which does not independently validate the entity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Real-Time Per-Garment Virtual Try-On with Temporal Consistency for Loose-Fitting Garments." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5P3IIHIQ

@misc{pith2026250612348,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Real-Time Per-Garment Virtual Try-On with Temporal Consistency for Loose-Fitting Garments},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5P3IIHIQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.12348}
}
read the original abstract

Per-garment virtual try-on methods collect garment-specific datasets and train networks tailored to each garment to achieve superior results. However, these approaches often struggle with loose-fitting garments due to two key limitations: (1) They rely on human body semantic maps to align garments with the body, but these maps become unreliable when body contours are obscured by loose-fitting garments, resulting in degraded outcomes; (2) They train garment synthesis networks on a per-frame basis without utilizing temporal information, leading to noticeable jittering artifacts. To address the first limitation, we propose a two-stage approach for robust semantic map estimation. First, we extract a garment-invariant representation from the raw input image. This representation is then passed through an auxiliary network to estimate the semantic map. This enhances the robustness of semantic map estimation under loose-fitting garments during garment-specific dataset generation. To address the second limitation, we introduce a recurrent garment synthesis framework that incorporates temporal dependencies to improve frame-to-frame coherence while maintaining real-time performance. We conducted qualitative and quantitative evaluations to demonstrate that our method outperforms existing approaches in both image quality and temporal coherence. Ablation studies further validate the effectiveness of the garment-invariant representation and the recurrent synthesis framework.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.12348 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Our virtual try-on system features an efficient inference pipeline that enables real-time performance. (b) Our method produces highly realistic 360◦ virtual try-on results for loose-fitting garments. Abstract Per-garment virtual try-on methods collect garment-specific datasets and train networks tailored to each garment to achieve superior results. However, these approaches often struggle with loose-fitting garm… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Illustration of the training and inference pipelines for applying the method proposed in [57] to virtually try on a loose-fitting garment. (a) During training, the garment synthesis network is trained using degraded DensePose [19] outputs. (b) During inference, a distribution mismatch be￾tween training and input data leads to suboptimal garment synthesis results. Unlike general image-based methods, per-garment virtu… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Overview of our method. We first train a per-person BodyMap network using images of a person wearing tight-fitting garments. This network is then used to robustly estimate body semantic maps for the same person in a loose-fitting garment. These estimated maps are subsequently used to train a per-garment ReGarSyn network. Once trained, the ReGarSynt network enables real-time virtual try-on for arbitrary persons [PIT… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: DensePose [19] accurately estimates the human body semantic map when subjects wear tight-fitting gar￾ments (left). However, its performance significantly degrades with loose-fitting garments due to occlusions (right). computationally intensive, whereas the semantic map…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Garment-invariant representation extraction from a person image. 3.3 Reliable Human Body Semantic Map Estimation Unlike [57], which employs a simplified DensePose map as the human body semantic representation, our approach uti￾lizes an even more simplified version, in …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Visual illustration of human body semantic maps: (a) The input image; (b) The DensePose map; (c) The human body semantic map of [57]; (d) Our proposed human body semantic map. We obtain the human body semantic map through a two￾step process: First, we extract the garme…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The boundary between the lower and upper body of the semantic map generated by DensePose [19] is sensitive to garment variation, even for tight-fitting garments. To generate the training data for the BodyMap network tailored to a specific person, we record a video of t…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Detailed illustration of the ReGarSyn network training process. Here, ˜I 𝑡 𝑔 and ˜I 𝑡 𝑚 denote the synthesized garment image and mask at time step 𝑡, respectively. C and H represent the cell state and hidden state of the ConvLSTM module, capturing temporal dependencie…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Detailed illustration of the inference pipeline for the ReGarSyn network. jacket (second row) does not exhibit such artifacts due to its relatively tight-fitting structure, it reveals temporal inconsis￾tencies attributable to the baseline’s frame-by-frame garment synt…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Virtual try-on results for unseen body shapes. Our ReGarSyn networks trained on per-garment datasets collected by a single human model demonstrate strong gen￾eralization to unseen body shapes. 4.3 Quantitative Evaluation Since collecting paired ground truth data for l…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Qualitative comparison of our method against OOTDiffusion [60], ViViD [14], and the baseline method [57]. Furthermore, to demonstrate the generalization ability of our ReGarSyn networks trained on per-garment datasets collected by a single human model, we present the …
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Three alternative intermediate representations used in ablation study for human body semantic map esti￾mation. both tight-fitting and loose-fitting clothing is not feasible. Therefore, we can only conduct a qualitative comparison. The metrics used in Section 4.3 are u…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Ablation study on garment-invariant representa￾tion. DP: The semantic map estimated by DensePose [19] is not robust against loose-fitting garments. HM: Using joint heatmaps that include garment-sensitive joints leads to the inflation of the semantic map. SHM: Using jo…
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Ablation study on ConvLSTM module. The dif￾ference map visualizing absolute differences between con￾secutive output frames shows that the ConvLSTM module enhances temporal consistency effectively. 5 Limitations and Future Work In addition to the common limitations men…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [57]

    Zaiqiang Wu, Yechen Li, Jingyuan Liu, Yuki Shibata, Takayuki Hori, I Shen, Takeo Igarashi, et al. 2025. Low-Barrier Dataset Collection with Real Human Body for Interactive Per-Garment Virtual Try-On. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.10468 (2025)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  2. [1]

    Yukang Cao, Masoud Hadi, Liang Pan, and Ziwei Liu. 2024. GS-VTON: Controllable 3D Virtual Try-on with Gaussian Splatting.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.05259 (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  3. [2]

    Joao Carreira and Andrew Zisserman. 2017. Quo vadis, action recogni- tion? a new model and the kinetics dataset. In proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition . 6299–6308

    work page 2017

  4. [3]

    Andrés Casado-Elvira, Marc Comino Trinidad, and Dan Casas. 2022. Pergamo: Personalized 3d garments from monocular video. In Com- puter Graphics Forum, Vol. 41. Wiley Online Library, 293–304

    work page 2022

  5. [4]

    Chieh-Yun Chen, Yi-Chung Chen, Hong-Han Shuai, and Wen-Huang Cheng. 2023. Size does matter: Size-aware virtual try-on via clothing- oriented transformation try-on network. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision . 7513–7522

    work page 2023

  6. [5]

    Chieh-Yun Chen, Ling Lo, Pin-Jui Huang, Hong-Han Shuai, and Wen- Huang Cheng. 2021. Fashionmirror: Co-attention feature-remapping virtual try-on with sequential template poses. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision . 13809–13818

    work page 2021

  7. [6]

    Haodong Chen, Yongle Huang, Haojian Huang, Xiangsheng Ge, and Dian Shao. 2024. Gaussianvton: 3d human virtual try-on via multi- stage gaussian splatting editing with image prompting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.07472 (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  8. [7]

    Sherry X Chen, Alex Christopher Lim, Yimeng Liu, Pradeep Sen, and Misha Sra. 2025. SiCo: An Interactive Size-Controllable Virtual Try-On Approach for Informed Decision-Making. In Proceedings of the 2025 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference . 1815–1825

    work page 2025

Show all 66 references
  1. [8]

    Yiwen Chen, Zilong Chen, Chi Zhang, Feng Wang, Xiaofeng Yang, Yikai Wang, Zhongang Cai, Lei Yang, Huaping Liu, and Guosheng Lin

  2. [9]

    Seunghwan Choi, Sunghyun Park, Minsoo Lee, and Jaegul Choo. 2021. Viton-hd: High-resolution virtual try-on via misalignment-aware nor- malization. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 14131–14140

    2021

  3. [10]

    Toby Chong, I-Chao Shen, Nobuyuki Umetani, and Takeo Igarashi

  4. [11]

    Gabriel Cirio, Jorge Lopez-Moreno, David Miraut, and Miguel A Otaduy. 2014. Yarn-level simulation of woven cloth. ACM Trans- actions on Graphics (TOG) 33, 6 (2014), 1–11

    2014

  5. [12]

    Haoye Dong, Xiaodan Liang, Xiaohui Shen, Bowen Wu, Bing-Cheng Chen, and Jian Yin. 2019. Fw-gan: Flow-navigated warping gan for video virtual try-on. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international con- ference on computer vision . 1161–1170

    2019

  6. [13]

    Jiahua Dong and Yu-Xiong Wang. 2023. Vica-nerf: View-consistency- aware 3d editing of neural radiance fields. Advances in Neural Infor- mation Processing Systems 36 (2023), 61466–61477

    2023

  7. [14]

    Zixun Fang, Wei Zhai, Aimin Su, Hongliang Song, Kai Zhu, Mao Wang, Yu Chen, Zhiheng Liu, Yang Cao, and Zheng-Jun Zha. 2024. ViViD: Video Virtual Try-on using Diffusion Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.11794 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Abolfazl Farahani, Sahar Voghoei, Khaled Rasheed, and Hamid R Arab- nia. 2021. A brief review of domain adaptation. Advances in data science and information engineering: proceedings from ICDATA 2020 and IKE 2020 (2021), 877–894

    2021

  9. [16]

    Yao Feng, Jinlong Yang, Marc Pollefeys, Michael J Black, and Timo Bolkart. 2022. Capturing and animation of body and clothing from monocular video. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2022 Conference Papers . 1–9. , , Wu et al

    2022

  10. [17]

    Artur Grigorev, Michael J Black, and Otmar Hilliges. 2023. Hood: Hierarchical graphs for generalized modelling of clothing dynamics. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 16965–16974

    2023

  11. [18]

    Peng Guan, Loretta Reiss, David A Hirshberg, Alexander Weiss, and Michael J Black. 2012. Drape: Dressing any person. ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG) 31, 4 (2012), 1–10

    2012

  12. [19]

    Rıza Alp Güler, Natalia Neverova, and Iasonas Kokkinos. 2018. Dense- pose: Dense human pose estimation in the wild. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition . 7297–7306

    2018

  13. [20]

    Oshri Halimi, Egor Larionov, Zohar Barzelay, Philipp Herholz, and Tuur Stuyck. 2023. Physgraph: Physics-based integration using graph neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.11841 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Oshri Halimi, Tuur Stuyck, Donglai Xiang, Timur Bagautdinov, He Wen, Ron Kimmel, Takaaki Shiratori, Chenglei Wu, Yaser Sheikh, and Fabian Prada. 2022. Pattern-Based Cloth Registration and Sparse-View Animation. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 41, 6 (2022), 1–17

    2022

  15. [22]

    Zijian He, Yuwei Ning, Yipeng Qin, Wangrun Wang, Sibei Yang, Liang Lin, and Guanbin Li. 2025. VTON 360: High-fidelity virtual try-on from any viewing direction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.12165 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Judy Hoffman, Dequan Wang, Fisher Yu, and Trevor Darrell. 2016. Fcns in the wild: Pixel-level adversarial and constraint-based adaptation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.02649 (2016)

    2016 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Phillip Isola, Jun-Yan Zhu, Tinghui Zhou, and Alexei A Efros. 2017. Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 1125–1134

    2017

  18. [25]

    Nikolay Jetchev and Urs Bergmann. 2017. The conditional analogy gan: Swapping fashion articles on people images. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision workshops . 2287–2292

    2017

  19. [26]

    Jianbin Jiang, Tan Wang, He Yan, and Junhui Liu. 2022. Cloth- former: Taming video virtual try-on in all module. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition . 10799–10808

    2022

  20. [27]

    Jonathan M Kaldor, Doug L James, and Steve Marschner. 2008. Simu- lating knitted cloth at the yarn level. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2008 papers. 1–9

    2008

  21. [28]

    Johanna Karras, Yingwei Li, Nan Liu, Luyang Zhu, Innfarn Yoo, An- dreas Lugmayr, Chris Lee, and Ira Kemelmacher-Shlizerman. 2024. Fashion-VDM: Video Diffusion Model for Virtual Try-On. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.00225 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Bernhard Kerbl, Georgios Kopanas, Thomas Leimkühler, and George Drettakis. 2023. 3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering. ACM Trans. Graph. 42, 4 (2023), 139–1

    2023

  23. [30]

    Rawal Khirodkar, Timur Bagautdinov, Julieta Martinez, Su Zhaoen, Austin James, Peter Selednik, Stuart Anderson, and Shunsuke Saito

  24. [31]

    Jeongho Kim, Guojung Gu, Minho Park, Sunghyun Park, and Jaegul Choo. 2024. Stableviton: Learning semantic correspondence with latent diffusion model for virtual try-on. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition . 8176–8185

    2024

  25. [32]

    Zorah Lahner, Daniel Cremers, and Tony Tung. 2018. Deepwrinkles: Accurate and realistic clothing modeling. InProceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV) . 667–684

    2018

  26. [33]

    In European Conference on Computer Vision

    Sapiens: Foundation for human vision models. In European Conference on Computer Vision . Springer, 206–228

  27. [34]

    Zhe Li, Zerong Zheng, Lizhen Wang, and Yebin Liu. 2024. Animatable Gaussians: Learning Pose-dependent Gaussian Maps for High-fidelity Human Avatar Modeling. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) . 19711–19722

    2024

  28. [35]

    Siyou Lin, Zhe Li, Zhaoqi Su, Zerong Zheng, Hongwen Zhang, and Yebin Liu. 2024. Layga: Layered gaussian avatars for animatable cloth- ing transfer. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2024 Conference Papers . 1–11

    2024

  29. [36]

    Sangyun Lee, Gyojung Gu, Sunghyun Park, Seunghwan Choi, and Jaegul Choo. 2022. High-resolution virtual try-on with misalignment and occlusion-handled conditions. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 204–219

    2022

  30. [37]

    Ben Mildenhall, Pratul P Srinivasan, Matthew Tancik, Jonathan T Barron, Ravi Ramamoorthi, and Ren Ng. 2021. Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis. Commun. ACM 65, 1 (2021), 99–106

    2021

  31. [38]

    Rahul Narain, Armin Samii, and James F O’brien. 2012. Adaptive anisotropic remeshing for cloth simulation. ACM transactions on graphics (TOG) 31, 6 (2012), 1–10

    2012

  32. [39]

    Matthew Loper, Naureen Mahmood, Javier Romero, Gerard Pons-Moll, and Michael J Black. 2015. SMPL: A Skinned Multi-Person Linear Model. Acm Transactions on Graphics 34, Article 248 (2015)

    2015

  33. [40]

    Chaitanya Patel, Zhouyingcheng Liao, and Gerard Pons-Moll. 2020. Tailornet: Predicting clothing in 3d as a function of human pose, shape and garment style. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on com- puter vision and pattern recognition . 7365–7375

    2020

  34. [41]

    Nikhila Ravi, Valentin Gabeur, Yuan-Ting Hu, Ronghang Hu, Chai- tanya Ryali, Tengyu Ma, Haitham Khedr, Roman Rädle, Chloe Rolland, Laura Gustafson, et al. 2024. Sam 2: Segment anything in images and videos. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.00714 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Xiaoyu Pan, Jiaming Mai, Xinwei Jiang, Dongxue Tang, Jingxiang Li, Tianjia Shao, Kun Zhou, Xiaogang Jin, and Dinesh Manocha. 2022. Pre- dicting loose-fitting garment deformations using bone-driven motion networks. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2022 Conference Proceedings . 1–10

    2022

  36. [43]

    Swami Sankaranarayanan, Yogesh Balaji, Carlos D Castillo, and Rama Chellappa. 2018. Generate to adapt: Aligning domains using generative adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition . 8503–8512

    2018

  37. [44]

    Igor Santesteban, Miguel A Otaduy, and Dan Casas. 2019. Learning- based animation of clothing for virtual try-on. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 38. Wiley Online Library, 355–366

    2019

  38. [45]

    Amélie Royer, Konstantinos Bousmalis, Stephan Gouws, Fred Bertsch, Inbar Mosseri, Forrester Cole, and Kevin Murphy. 2020. Xgan: Unsu- pervised image-to-image translation for many-to-many mappings. In Domain Adaptation for Visual Understanding . Springer, 33–49

    2020

  39. [46]

    Igor Santesteban, Nils Thuerey, Miguel A Otaduy, and Dan Casas

  40. [47]

    Masahiro Sekine, Kaoru Sugita, Frank Perbet, Björn Stenger, and Masashi Nishiyama. 2014. Virtual fitting by single-shot body shape estimation. In Int. Conf. on 3D Body Scanning Technologies , Vol. 406. Citeseer, 413

    2014

  41. [48]

    Igor Santesteban, Miguel A Otaduy, and Dan Casas. 2022. Snug: Self- supervised neural dynamic garments. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition . 8140–8150

    2022

  42. [49]

    Xingjian Shi, Zhourong Chen, Hao Wang, Dit-Yan Yeung, Wai-Kin Wong, and Wang-chun Woo. 2015. Convolutional LSTM network: A machine learning approach for precipitation nowcasting. Advances in neural information processing systems 28 (2015)

    2015

  43. [50]

    In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Self-supervised collision handling via generative 3d garment models for virtual try-on. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition . 11763–11773

  44. [51]

    Yu Sun, Wu Liu, Qian Bao, Yili Fu, Tao Mei, and Michael J Black. 2022. Putting people in their place: Monocular regression of 3d people in depth. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 13243–13252

    2022

  45. [52]

    Andrew Selle, Jonathan Su, Geoffrey Irving, and Ronald Fedkiw. 2008. Robust high-resolution cloth using parallelism, history-based colli- sions, and accurate friction. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 15, 2 (2008), 339–350

    2008

  46. [53]

    Eric Tzeng, Judy Hoffman, Kate Saenko, and Trevor Darrell. 2017. Adversarial discriminative domain adaptation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition . 7167–7176

    2017

  47. [54]

    Dan Song, Xuanpu Zhang, Juan Zhou, Weizhi Nie, Ruofeng Tong, and An-An Liu. 2023. Image-Based Virtual Try-On: A Survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.04811 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  48. [55]

    Haoyu Wang, Zhilu Zhang, Donglin Di, Shiliang Zhang, and Wang- meng Zuo. 2024. MV-VTON: Multi-View Virtual Try-On with Diffusion Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.17364 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  49. [56]

    Eric Tzeng, Judy Hoffman, Trevor Darrell, and Kate Saenko. 2015. Simultaneous deep transfer across domains and tasks. In Proceedings Real-Time Per-Garment Virtual Try-On with Temporal Consistency for Loose-Fitting Garments , , of the IEEE international conference on computer v...

    2015

  50. [58]

    Eric Tzeng, Judy Hoffman, Ning Zhang, Kate Saenko, and Trevor Dar- rell. 2019. Deep domain confusion: Maximizing for domain invariance. arXiv 2014. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.3474 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Donglai Xiang, Fabian Prada, Timur Bagautdinov, Weipeng Xu, Yuan Dong, He Wen, Jessica Hodgins, and Chenglei Wu. 2021. Modeling clothing as a separate layer for an animatable human avatar. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 40, 6 (2021), 1–15

    2021

  52. [60]

    Ting-Chun Wang, Ming-Yu Liu, Jun-Yan Zhu, Andrew Tao, Jan Kautz, and Bryan Catanzaro. 2018. High-resolution image synthesis and semantic manipulation with conditional gans. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition . 8798–8807

    2018

  53. [61]

    Zhengze Xu, Mengting Chen, Zhao Wang, Linyu Xing, Zhonghua Zhai, Nong Sang, Jinsong Lan, Shuai Xiao, and Changxin Gao. 2024. Tunnel Try-on: Excavating Spatial-temporal Tunnels for High-quality Virtual Try-on in Videos. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.17571 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Zaiqiang Wu, Jingyuan Liu, Long Hin Toby Chong, I-Chao Shen, and Takeo Igarashi. 2024. Virtual Measurement Garment for Per-Garment Virtual Try-On. In Graphics Interface 2024

    2024

  55. [64]

    Yuhao Xu, Tao Gu, Weifeng Chen, and Chengcai Chen. 2024. Ootdif- fusion: Outfitting fusion based latent diffusion for controllable virtual try-on. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.01779 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  56. [66]

    Jun-Yan Zhu, Taesung Park, Phillip Isola, and Alexei A Efros. 2017. Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adver- sarial networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision. 2223–2232

    2017

  57. [2021]

    In The 34th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology

    Per garment capture and synthesis for real-time virtual try-on. In The 34th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 457–469

  58. [2024]

    In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Gaussianeditor: Swift and controllable 3d editing with gaussian splatting. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 21476–21485

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.