REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 48 references
Defect-Mediated Pairing and Dissociation of Strongly Correlated Electrons in Low Dimensional Lattices: The Quantum Taxi Effect
T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read A single site-energy defect can switch two strongly correlated electrons between a bound pair and a localized-plus-free configuration, a process the paper calls the Quantum Taxi Effect.
desk verdict A clean exact-mapping demonstration of defect-mediated pairing/dissociation for two electrons in a 1D extended Hubbard chain, with the caveat that the effect is shown only in one tuned finite-size setup and is a fermionic reprise of an earlier vibron mechanism. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The load-bearing construction is the exact mapping of the two-electron singlet dynamics on the 1D Hubbard chain to the motion of a single fictitious particle on a 2D triangular lattice, where each configuration-state function becomes a site. Coulomb terms $U$ and $V$ and the defect strength $\Delta$ become local self-energy defects, and hoppings are $-J$ or $-\sqrt{2}J$. On this lattice the relevant resonance is between the TEBS band (two electrons bound on the same or neighboring sites) and the SELS+SEFS band (one electron pinned at the defect, the other free); at resonance the eigenstates delocalize along a reaction pathway of $3N-4$ configurations, and the number of such delocalized "active" states controls the transfer probability.
What would settle it
Run the same parameter-optimized dynamics on chains of length $N = 16, 20, 24, 30$ with the defect at an interior site and with initial wave packets of different widths and centers; if the near-97% transfer efficiency or the density plateau at the defect does not persist or systematically degrades, the claimed effect is a finite-size or initial-state artifact rather than an intrinsic resonance phenomenon of the model.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The central claim is that the Quantum Taxi Effect is a real dynamical process of the extended Hubbard model in the strongly correlated regime $U \sim V \sim \Delta \gg J$. When one electron is localized at the defect and another approaches as a wave packet, a resonance between the band of two-electron bound states (TEBS) and the band of single-electron-localized-plus-single-electron-free states (SELS+SEFS) lets the localized electron leave the defect and form a bound pair that propagates away; conversely, a bound pair arriving at the defect can dissociate, trapping one electron there while the other reverses direction and leaves. The paper demonstrates both directions numerically and identifies the mechanism as hybridization of these two families of eigenstates along a reaction pathway of the effective 2D lattice, with optimized parameters $V = 10.96$, $\Delta = 12.64$ for pairing (97% departure from the defect) and $V = 10.36$, $\Delta = 11.92$ for dissociation (about 0.98 occupation of the defect).
Load-bearing premise
The demonstration is carried out on a single finite chain of 20 sites with the defect at the edge and with hand-picked Gaussian initial wave packets, so if the effect changes with chain length, defect position, or initial-state shape, it may not be a general property of the Hubbard model.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- A local site-energy defect can act as a switch that converts an incoming bound electron pair into a trapped electron plus a free electron, and the reverse, purely through resonance between bound and localized-plus-free two-electron states.
- Efficient switching requires $V$ comparable to $U$, so that the bound states include a substantial nearest-neighbor component; the two optimized regions in parameter space correspond to resonances with the high-energy TEBS-I and low-energy TEBS-II bands.
- At the optimized parameters, nearly all electronic density can be moved: about 97% leaves the defect in the pairing scenario, and about 98% of the density accumulates at the defect in the dissociation scenario.
- On a chain carrying a second defect, the same mechanism shuttles the density between the two ends, showing that one electron can actively transport another across the lattice.
- The transfer efficiency is governed by how many eigenstates delocalize along the reaction pathway; optimized parameters roughly triple the number of active states, providing many parallel channels for the wave packet.
Reading between the lines
- If the effect survives tests at larger chain lengths and with other initial-state shapes, the defect acts as a deterministic converter between a propagating pair and a stationary single-electron resource, suggesting a concrete route to controlled pair creation or splitting in low-dimensional quantum devices.
- Because the mechanism is a resonance in an effective single-particle lattice, the same construction should apply to other two-particle systems with short-range interactions—for instance exciton pairs, phonon pairs, or cold-atom doublons—wherever a local potential can tune the two relevant band energies into crossing.
- A natural next calculation is to quantify how the near-97% transfer efficiency degrades with wave-packet width, chain length, and defect position; the paper's two-defect demonstration suggests boundary reflections can be absorbed into the picture, but that remains to be shown.
- For a device proposal, the predicted velocity difference (free electron near $1.8J$, pair near $J$) offers a measurable signature: time-resolved charge sensing at the defect and at the opposite end would distinguish the taxi process from ordinary single-particle transmission.
Signed reviews
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper studies the quantum dynamics of two interacting electrons in a one-dimensional extended Hubbard chain with a local site-energy defect, restricted to the singlet subspace. The two-electron problem is mapped exactly onto a single-particle tight-binding model on a two-dimensional triangular lattice (Appendix A), which allows the authors to classify eigenstates into two-electron free states (TEFS), two-electron bound states (TEBS-I and TEBS-II), single-electron-localized/single-electron-free states (SELS+SEFS), and two-electron localized bound states (TELBS). The central claim is that when U ≈ V ≈ Δ ≫ J, resonances between TEBS and SELS+SEFS bands produce a phenomenon dubbed the Quantum Taxi Effect: a free electron approaching an occupied defect can form a bound pair that propagates away, and a bound pair traveling toward the defect can dissociate into one electron localized at the defect and one free electron. Numerical time evolution on a finite N=20 chain, with parameters optimized by scanning V and Δ, shows up to 97% density transfer away from the defect in the pairing scenario (Sec. III.A) and about 98% density accumulation at the defect in the dissociation scenario (Sec. III.B). A two-defect extension (Sec. III.C) is presented to illustrate simultaneous pickup and drop-off, and a weighted inverse participation ratio analysis (Sec. IV) is used to argue that the effect is associated with delocalization of hybrid eigenstates along the reaction pathway.
Significance. If the result holds, the paper offers a clear and potentially useful microscopic mechanism for defect-mediated pairing and dissociation in strongly correlated one-dimensional systems. The exact mapping of the two-electron singlet sector to a 2D tight-binding model is a solid contribution, and the finite-size time-evolution results are exact numerical outputs for the specified parameters. The paper also gives a transparent criterion (U ~ V ~ Δ) for the resonance condition and shows parameter-space maps that quantify efficiency. However, the evidence is currently limited to a single system size (N=20), an edge-defect geometry, hand-picked Gaussian wave packets, and parameters that are tuned to maximize the effect; the generic validity of the QTE as a model property is not yet established. With additional robustness checks and clarification of the two-defect simulation, the paper could become a useful reference for defect-assisted correlated-electron transport.
major comments (3)
- [Sec. III.A/III.B, Eqs. (7)-(8), Figs. 3b/7b] The QTE is demonstrated only for N=20 with the defect at the terminal site and with wave-packet parameters fixed to x0=10, Δx=4, k0=1.3 (pairing) and R0=10, Δk=0.5, k0=−π/2 (dissociation). No finite-size scaling, no bulk-defect geometry, and no variation of packet width or center momentum are reported. The optimized efficiencies are read at a single time t*=12 (Fig. 3b) or t*=20 (Fig. 7b), and the finite chain boundary at the opposite end could contribute to the observed transfer. Because the paper's conclusion claims general design principles for low-dimensional lattices, this missing robustness analysis is load-bearing: the reader cannot assess whether the QTE is a property of the Hamiltonian or of a particular tuned finite-system simulation.
- [Sec. III.C, Fig. 9] The text states that the parameters are fixed to V=10.9 and Δ=12.6, while the Fig. 9 caption gives V=9.4 and Δ=8.32. This internal inconsistency makes the two-defect demonstration ambiguous. Since the section is intended to show that the QTE supports simultaneous pickup and drop-off in a single simulation, the discrepancy must be resolved and the actual parameters used for Fig. 9 must be stated consistently.
- [Sec. III.A.1/III.A.3, Figs. 3b/6] The paper first identifies a band crossing in the infinite-lattice spectrum (Fig. 6a) and then scans V and Δ to maximize the efficiency ϵ(t*)=1−n(N,t*) (Fig. 3b), reporting optima at V=10.96, Δ=12.64 and V=9.4, Δ=8.32. This procedure fits the observed effect to the resonance rather than predicting it independently. The claim that the TEBS/SELS+SEFS resonance is the mechanism would be strengthened by a predictive check, e.g., computing the efficiency at the analytically predicted crossing point without scanning, or quantifying the width of the efficiency peak and showing that it tracks the crossing over a range of parameters. As presented, the optimized values are tuned to the phenomenon, leaving the generality of the condition U~V~Δ as an open question.
minor comments (4)
- [Sec. IV, Eq. (9)-(11)] The text says the initial states are defined 'in Sec. IV', but they are actually defined in Sec. III; also, 'SELF+SEFS' in the same section is a typo for 'SELS+SEFS'.
- [Sec. III.A.3, first sentence] The sentence refers to 'Figs. 6a and 6a'; it should read 'Figs. 6a and 6b'.
- [Eq. (6)] The density formula double-counts the diagonal term (x1=x2=x), which appears in both the first sum (with x1=x) and the second sum (with x2=x). The correct expression should exclude one of these contributions.
- [Sec. IV, Eq. (12)] The active-state threshold ε=0.01 is fixed arbitrarily; the reported number of active states and the w-IPR depend on this choice, so a brief sensitivity analysis would help the reader gauge the robustness of the delocalization measure.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity: the QTE dynamics are exact numerical outputs, and the resonance interpretation is supported by eigenvector analysis and a derived exact mapping.
full rationale
The paper does not reduce to its inputs by construction. The central claim—that a site defect can mediate pairing/dissociation via hybridization of TEBS and SELS+SEFS eigenstates—rests on (i) exact diagonalization of the finite-chain extended Hubbard Hamiltonian (Sec. III), (ii) a fully derived mapping to a 2D tight-binding network (Appendix A, Eqs. A3–A8), and (iii) explicit eigenvector analysis (Fig. 6c) showing delocalization of hybrid states along the reaction pathway. The optimized parameters (V=10.96, Δ=12.64; V=9.4, Δ=8.32; V=10.36, Δ=11.92) are presented as results of an explicit scan of the efficiency 1−n(N,t*) at fixed times, not as independent predictions; the text says 'we investigated the values taken by nN(t)... we fixed the time to t*=12 and evaluated the density as a function of V and Δ' (Sec. III.A.1). This is transparent parameter exploration, not fitted-input-called-prediction. The only self-citations (Refs. [29], [30], [32], [35], [41], [42]) are contextual or supplementary; the 2D-lattice equivalence is re-derived in Appendix A rather than imported. A minor internal inconsistency exists between Sec. III.C (V=10.9, Δ=12.6) and the Fig. 9 caption (V=9.4, Δ=8.32), and the finite-N=20 edge-defect geometry with fixed wave-packet parameters limits generality; these are correctness/robustness concerns, not circularity. Therefore the circularity score is 1.
Assumptions & free parameters
free parameters (7)
- U (on-site repulsion) =
10 (fixed)
- V (nearest-neighbor Coulomb interaction) =
10.96, 9.4, 10.36 (optimized)
- Delta (defect amplitude) =
12.64, 8.32, 11.92 (optimized)
- Wave packet parameters (scenario A: x0, Delta x, k0) =
x0=10, Delta x=4, k0=1.3
- Wave packet parameters (scenario B: R0, Delta k, k0) =
R0=10, Delta k=0.5, k0=-pi/2
- N (chain length) =
20
- Active-state threshold epsilon =
0.01
assumptions (5)
- domain assumption The extended Hubbard model with onsite U, nearest-neighbor V, and hopping J captures the relevant two-electron correlated dynamics.
- standard math The singlet subspace is decoupled from triplet states under the Hamiltonian.
- domain assumption The eigenstates of the finite chain can be classified into the six families (TEFS, SELS+SEFS, TEBS-I/II, TELBS-I/II) based on the 2D lattice topology.
- ad hoc to paper The resonance condition U ~ V ~ Delta is sufficient and necessary to observe the QTE in the strong-correlation regime.
- domain assumption The initial Gaussian wave packets are physically appropriate representatives of a propagating electron or pair.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Defect-Mediated Pairing and Dissociation of Strongly Correlated Electrons in Low Dimensional Lattices: The Quantum Taxi Effect." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YFEKJ6NK
@misc{pith2026250612487,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Defect-Mediated Pairing and Dissociation of Strongly Correlated Electrons in Low Dimensional Lattices: The Quantum Taxi Effect},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YFEKJ6NK}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.12487}
}
abstract
We study the quantum dynamics of a strongly correlated electron pair in a one-dimensional lattice, focusing on the occurrence of local dissociation/pairing mechanisms induced by a site energy defect. To this end, we simulate the time evolution of two interacting electrons on a finite-size chain governed by an extended Hubbard Hamiltonian including on-site Coulomb repulsion $ U $ and nearest-neighbor interaction $V$, along with single-electron hopping $J$. By introducing a local site energy defect with amplitude $ \Delta $, we show that a transition between spatially paired/dissociated electrons can occur in the vicinity of this site. Such mechanisms arise in a strongly correlated regime with non-zero nearest neighbor Coulomb interactions and under the conditions $ (U \sim V \sim \Delta) \gg J$. To rationalize these phenomena, we reformulate the two-electron dynamics of the original Hubbard chain as an effective single-particle problem on a two-dimensional network. Within this framework, we show that the pairing/dissociation dynamics are driven by resonances between two distinct families of two-electron eigenstates: $(i)$ states with two spatially well-separated electrons with one located at the site defect, and $(ii)$ states with locally bound electron located away from the defect. At resonance, these states hybridize, allowing transitions from locally paired to dissociated electrons (and vice versa) in the vicinity of the defect. These results provide new insights into exotic pairing phenomena in strongly correlated electronic systems and may have implications for the design of tunable many-body states in low-dimensional quantum materials.
Figures
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Time-evolution of the electronic density nN (t) on the site defect Let us first consider the time evolution of the electronic density nN (t) at the defect site. To this end, we assume the existence of a resonance between the TEBS and the SELS+SEFS by choosing ∆ = 10. Fig. 3a shows the time evolution of the electronic density on the site defectnN (t) for V...
-
[2]
Time-evolution of the effective single particle on the equivalent 2D-triangular Lattice To understand the underlying physics when the pa- rameters are optimized, Fig. 4 shows the time evolution of the square modulus of the wave function |ψ(x1, x2, t)|2 in the singlet subspace for V = 10 .96, and ∆ = 12 .64. At time t = 0, |ψ(x1, x2, t)|2 defines a Gaussia...
-
[3]
6a and 6a for V = 10.96 and ∆ = 12 .64
Analysis of the two-electron energy spectrum To clarify the origin of this scenario, let us examine the two-electron energy spectrum displayed in Figs. 6a and 6a for V = 10.96 and ∆ = 12 .64. Fig. 6a shows the spectrum of the extended Hubbard model in an infinite translationally invariant lattice. In that case, the two- electron wave function being invari...
-
[4]
Time-evolution of the electronic density nN (t) on the site defect The time evolution of the electronic density nN (t) at the defect site is shown in Fig. 7a for U = ∆ = 10 and for V = 0 (black curve), V = 4 (red curve), V = 7 (green curve) and V = 10 (blue curve). For V = 0, initially equal to zero, nN (t) remains nearly zero at short times. It begins to...
-
[5]
Time-evolution of the effective single particle on the equivalent 2D-triangular Lattice To illustrate the physical process that takes place when the parameters are optimized, the behavior of the wave function |ψ(x1, x2, t)|2 in the singlet subspace is shown in Fig. 8 at times t = 0, 4, 8, 10, 12, and 15 for V = 10.36, and ∆ = 11.92. At t = 0, |ψ(x1, x2, t...
-
[6]
Bloch, ¨Uber die quantenmechanik der elektronen in kristallgittern, Zeitschrift f¨ ur physik52, 555 (1929)
F. Bloch, ¨Uber die quantenmechanik der elektronen in kristallgittern, Zeitschrift f¨ ur physik52, 555 (1929)
1929
-
[7]
G. N. Lewis, The atom and the molecule., Journal of the American Chemical Society 38, 762 (1916)
work page 1916
-
[8]
J. H. Van Vleck and A. Sherman, The quantum theory 16 of valence, Reviews of modern physics 7, 167 (1935)
work page 1935
Show all 48 references
-
[9]
C. A. Coulson, Representation of simple molecules by molecular orbitals, Quarterly Reviews, Chemical Society 1, 144 (1947)
1947
-
[10]
C. A. Coulson and I. Fischer, Xxxiv. notes on the molecu- lar orbital treatment of the hydrogen molecule, The Lon- don, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 40, 386 (1949)
1949
-
[11]
P. W. Atkins and R. S. Friedman, Molecular quantum mechanics (Oxford university press, 2011)
2011
-
[12]
Yanase, T
Y. Yanase, T. Jujo, T. Nomura, H. Ikeda, T. Hotta, and K. Yamada, Theory of superconductivity in strongly cor- related electron systems, Physics Reports 387, 1 (2003)
2003
-
[13]
A. H. Wilson, The theory of electronic semi-conductors, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Char- acter 133, 458 (1931)
1931
-
[14]
J. C. Slater and G. F. Koster, Simplified lcao method for the periodic potential problem, Physical review 94, 1498 (1954)
1954
-
[15]
L. P. Bouckaert, R. Smoluchowski, and E. Wigner, The- ory of brillouin zones and symmetry properties of wave functions in crystals, Physical Review 50, 58 (1936)
1936
-
[16]
Ashcroft, Solid state physics, Thomson Learning 39 (1976)
N. Ashcroft, Solid state physics, Thomson Learning 39 (1976)
1976
-
[17]
Bardeen, L
J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper, and J. R. Schrieffer, Theory of superconductivity, Physical review 108, 1175 (1957)
1957
-
[18]
Roseiro, A
P. Roseiro, A. Shah, S. Yalouz, and V. Robert, Inter- play between spinmerism and spin-orbit coupling for a d2 metal ion in an open-shell ligand field, ChemPhysChem 26, e202400914 (2025)
2025
-
[19]
Fausti, R
D. Fausti, R. Tobey, N. Dean, S. Kaiser, A. Dienst, M. C. Hoffmann, S. Pyon, T. Takayama, H. Takagi, and A. Cavalleri, Light-induced superconductivity in a stripe- ordered cuprate, science 331, 189 (2011)
2011
-
[20]
Miyata, F
K. Miyata, F. S. Conrad-Burton, F. L. Geyer, and X.- Y. Zhu, Triplet pair states in singlet fission, Chemical reviews 119, 4261 (2019)
2019
-
[21]
P. M. Zimmerman, F. Bell, D. Casanova, and M. Head- Gordon, Mechanism for singlet fission in pentacene and tetracene: From single exciton to two triplets, Journal of the American Chemical Society 133, 19944 (2011)
2011
-
[22]
T. C. Berkelbach, M. S. Hybertsen, and D. R. Reichman, Microscopic theory of singlet exciton fission. ii. applica- tion to pentacene dimers and the role of superexchange, The Journal of chemical physics 138 (2013)
2013
-
[23]
M. B. Smith and J. Michl, Singlet fission, Chemical re- views 110, 6891 (2010)
2010
-
[24]
Kaneko, T
T. Kaneko, T. Shirakawa, S. Sorella, and S. Yunoki, Pho- toinduced η pairing in the hubbard model, Physical re- view letters 122, 077002 (2019)
2019
-
[25]
Roseiro, S
P. Roseiro, S. Yalouz, D. J. Brook, N. Ben Amor, and V. Robert, Modifications of tanabe-sugano d 6 diagram induced by radical ligand field: ab initio inspection of a fe (ii)-verdazyl molecular complex, Inorganic Chemistry 62, 5737 (2023)
2023
-
[26]
Sheng, Z
D. Sheng, Z. Weng, C. Ting, and J. Dong, Magnetism and pairing in a c 60 molecule: A variational monte carlo study, Physical Review B 49, 4279 (1994)
1994
-
[27]
V´ erot, S
M. V´ erot, S. A. Borshch, and V. Robert, Importance of a multiconfigurational description for molecular junctions, Chemical Physics Letters 519, 125 (2012)
2012
-
[28]
S. Vela, M. Verot, E. Fromager, and V. Robert, Elec- tron transport through a spin crossover junction. per- spectives from a wavefunction-based approach, The Jour- nal of Chemical Physics 146 (2017)
2017
-
[29]
H. Gao, F. Schlawin, M. Buzzi, A. Cavalleri, and D. Jaksch, Photoinduced electron pairing in a driven cav- ity, Physical Review Letters 125, 053602 (2020)
2020
-
[30]
L. Pepe, V. Pouthier, and S. Yalouz, Optimized excitonic transport mediated by local energy defects: Survival of optimization laws in the presence of dephasing, Physical Review E 109, 014303 (2024)
2024
-
[31]
Zhang and Z
X. Zhang and Z. Song, Steady off-diagonal long-range order state in a half-filled dimerized hubbard chain in- duced by a resonant pulsed field, Physical Review B 106, 094301 (2022)
2022
-
[32]
Q. Wan, D. Vaz, L. Xiang, A. Ramavath, B. Vargo, J. Ye, J. Beaumariage, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, Z. Sun, et al., Proof of light-induced electron pairing in a bilayer structure, arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.06941 (2024)
2024 arXiv
-
[33]
Shankar and K
R. Shankar and K. Sinha, Photon-induced electron pair- ing, Physical Review B 7, 4291 (1973)
1973
-
[34]
P. W. Anderson, Absence of diffusion in certain random lattices, Physical review 109, 1492 (1958)
1958
-
[35]
Conversely, as observed in Sec
Note that, as mentioned previously, the occurrence of two domains results from the fact that the initial state belonging to the SELF+SEFS band, it can enter into resonance with either the TEBS-I band or the TEBS-II band. Conversely, as observed in Sec. III.B., Fig. 10b shows t...
-
[36]
Yalouz and V
S. Yalouz and V. Pouthier, Extended star graph as a light-harvesting-complex prototype: Excitonic absorp- tion speedup by peripheral energy defect tuning, Physical Review E 106, 064313 (2022)
2022
-
[37]
N. C. Ch´ avez, F. Mattiotti, J. M´ endez-Berm´ udez, F. Bor- gonovi, and G. L. Celardo, Disorder-enhanced and disorder-independent transport with long-range hopping: Application to molecular chains in optical cavities, Phys- ical Review Letters 126, 153201 (2021)
2021
-
[38]
Yalouz and V
S. Yalouz and V. Pouthier, Continuous-time quantum walk on an extended star graph: Disorder-enhanced trap- ping process, Physical Review E 101, 012310 (2020)
2020
-
[39]
Aizenman and S
M. Aizenman and S. Warzel, Extended states in a lifshitz tail regime for random schr¨ odinger operators on trees, Physical review letters 106, 136804 (2011)
2011
-
[40]
Aizenman and S
M. Aizenman and S. Warzel, Resonant delocalization for random schr¨ odinger operators on tree graphs, Journal of the European Mathematical Society 15, 1167 (2013)
2013
-
[41]
Pouthier, Disorder-enhanced exciton delocalization in an extended dendrimer, Physical Review E 90, 022818 (2014)
V. Pouthier, Disorder-enhanced exciton delocalization in an extended dendrimer, Physical Review E 90, 022818 (2014)
2014
-
[42]
A. L. Efros and M. Pollak, Electron-electron interactions in disordered systems, Vol. 10 (Elsevier, 2012)
2012
-
[43]
Vojta, Disorder in quantum many-body systems, An- nual Review of Condensed Matter Physics10, 233 (2019)
T. Vojta, Disorder in quantum many-body systems, An- nual Review of Condensed Matter Physics10, 233 (2019)
2019
-
[44]
Hubbard, Electron correlations in narrow energy bands, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London
J. Hubbard, Electron correlations in narrow energy bands, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 276, 238 (1963)
1963
-
[45]
Helgaker, P
T. Helgaker, P. Jorgensen, and J. Olsen, Molecular electronic-structure theory (John Wiley & Sons, 2013)
2013
-
[46]
K. A. Al-Hassanieh, J. Rinc´ on, E. Dagotto, and G. Al- varez, Wave-packet dynamics in the one-dimensional ex- tended hubbard model, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 88, 045107 (2013)
2013
-
[47]
Pouthier, Two-vibron bound states in α-helix pro- teins: The interplay between the intramolecular anhar- monicity and the strong vibron–phonon coupling, Phys
V. Pouthier, Two-vibron bound states in α-helix pro- teins: The interplay between the intramolecular anhar- monicity and the strong vibron–phonon coupling, Phys. Rev. E 68, 021909 (2003)
2003
-
[48]
Pouthier, Localized two-vibron bound-state dynam- ics in a molecular lattice with a defect: Resonances be- 17 tween bound, localized, and free states, Phys
V. Pouthier, Localized two-vibron bound-state dynam- ics in a molecular lattice with a defect: Resonances be- 17 tween bound, localized, and free states, Phys. Rev. B 71, 115401 (2005)
2005
Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.