Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 65 references

Fragmentation of a trapped multiple-species bosonic mixture

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Three-species bosonic mixtures get exact fragmentation formulas, with effects that cannot occur in one- or two-species systems.

desk verdict Solid exact-solvable three-species fragmentation paper; the central formulas are probably right, but the key factorization needs proof and a few typos need fixing before it can serve as a benchmark. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.12943 v1 pith:A64COUXM submitted 2025-06-15 cond-mat.quant-gas quant-ph

O. E. Alon , L. S. Cederbaum This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.quant-gasquant-ph PACS 67.85.-d
keywords bosonicmixturesfragmentationharmonic-interactionmodelreducedone-particledensitymatrixnaturalorbitalsexactlysolvablemany-bodythree-speciesmixtureBose-Einsteincondensatedepletion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper extends the exactly solvable harmonic-interaction model to a generic, imbalanced mixture of three bosonic species in a harmonic trap. It derives closed-form expressions for the ground-state energy, wavefunction, Gaussian one-particle densities, and natural-orbital occupations of every species, with the fragmentation of each species given explicitly as a function of all twelve parameters: the masses, particle numbers, and intra- and interspecies interaction strengths. These formulas expose fragmentation effects that only appear in multiple-species mixtures, such as controlling a two-species system by embedding it in a third-species bath, and driving the fragmentation of a non-interacting spectator species by tuning the interaction between the other two. The result matters because it turns fragmentation in a correlated three-component Bose gas into a directly computable quantity and provides analytical benchmarks for numerical many-body methods.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the Jacobi-coordinate decomposition of the many-body Hamiltonian into non-interacting relative-motion oscillators plus a coupled three-dimensional center-of-mass problem, whose frequencies matrix has eigenvalues $\Omega^+_{123}$, $\Omega^-_{123}$, and $\omega$. Integrating out the other species' centers of mass produces a Gaussian one-particle density matrix, and the algebraic identity $a_1 a_2 a_3 + 2b_{12}b_{13}b_{23} - (a_1 b_{23}^2 + a_2 b_{13}^2 + a_3 b_{12}^2) = m_1 m_2 m_3 \Omega^+_{123} \Omega^-_{123} \omega$ (Eq. 21) is used to simplify the coefficients. Mehler's formula, the Hermite-polynomial expansion of a Gaussian kernel, converts these density matrices into natural-orbital expansions, so per-species depletion is encoded in the single parameter $\rho_s = (W_s - 1)/(W_s + 1)$. The closed forms for $W_1$, $W_2$, $W_3$ reduce to the known two-species result when one species decouples and to the balanced three-species result when masses and interspecies interactions are equal.

What would settle it

Substitute any admissible parameter set (masses, particle numbers, interaction strengths satisfying the positivity conditions) into identity (21) and evaluate both sides numerically; a single counterexample would show that the simplified $W_1$, $W_2$, $W_3$ are not exact. Equivalently, diagonalize the many-body Hamiltonian for a small-particle-number instance and compare the resulting natural-orbital occupations with Eqs. (29)-(31).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that for the generic three-species harmonic-interaction model, everything about one-particle fragmentation can be written in closed form. After separating relative-motion and center-of-mass Jacobi coordinates, the ground state factorizes, and the reduced one-particle density matrix of each species is a Gaussian whose diagonalization with Mehler's formula yields natural-orbital occupations governed by a single depletion parameter per species, $\rho_s = (W_s - 1)/(W_s + 1)$. The $W_s$ are explicit algebraic functions of all twelve parameters of the Hamiltonian, collected in Eqs. (29)-(31). The key qualitative novelty is that the relative center-of-mass eigenvectors depend on the interspecies interactions, which is what makes three-species-only effects possible: the paper demonstrates, for example, that with species 1 and 3 non-interacting and the species 2-3 coupling fixed, increasing the repulsion between species 1 and 2 drives species 3 toward full fragmentation as the mixture approaches its stability boundary.

Load-bearing premise

The closed-form fragmentation formulas rest on the unshown algebraic identity (21) plus the five positivity conditions (12) that keep all frequencies real and the mixture bound — if either fails, the depletion parameters are not the simple expressions given.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Fragmentation of every species in a three-species bosonic mixture becomes a closed-form function of all parameters, so depletion landscapes can be mapped analytically instead of by solving a many-body problem numerically.
  • A two-species system coupled to a third-species bath shows non-monotonic fragmentation: the bath's depletion increases with coupling, while the system species can first de-fragment and then re-fragment; for given couplings there is an optimal bath mass that maximizes bath depletion.
  • Connectivity alone can control fragmentation: when species 1 and 3 do not interact and the species 2-3 coupling is fixed, tuning the 1-2 interaction changes species 3's depletion and size, with all three species approaching full fragmentation and diverging widths near the stability border on the repulsive side.
  • In the balanced equal-mass case the fragmentation of each species still depends on the individual particle numbers $N_1$, $N_2$, $N_3$ even though the center-of-mass frequencies depend only on their sum, so the mixture is not equivalent to a single-species condensate.
  • The exact closed forms provide analytical benchmarks for numerical many-body approaches and for comparing many-body results with the mean-field Gross-Pitaevskii solution derived in Appendix B.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the same integration scheme that produces Eq. (21) for three species should extend to P-species mixtures, yielding analogous closed-form fragmentation parameters with additional three-body and higher connectivity terms; the paper only works out the three-species case.
  • Beyond the paper: because the spectator species 3's fragmentation is a sensitive function of the 1-2 interaction, depletion measurements on a non-interacting species could serve as a non-invasive probe of interspecies coupling strengths in ultracold gas experiments.
  • Beyond the paper: the exact Gaussian densities and occupations make this model a natural testbed for time-dependent quenches, where the out-of-equilibrium fragmentation could be computed exactly and compared with the static formulas in the infinite-time limit.
  • Beyond the paper: near the stability boundary, where $\Omega^-_{123} \to 0$, small changes in an interspecies interaction produce amplified fragmentation response; a quantitative susceptibility $d\rho/d\lambda$ extracted from the closed forms could be compared directly with experiments.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper considers a trapped mixture of three distinct bosonic species with harmonic intra- and interspecies interactions, the generic three-species harmonic-interaction model. It diagonalizes the many-body Hamiltonian, writes the ground state in Jacoby coordinates, constructs the one-particle reduced density matrices of all three species, and diagonalizes them with Mehler's formula. The resulting depletion formulas, exemplified by Eq. (29), are closed-form functions of all masses, particle numbers, and interaction strengths. Two applications highlight three-species effects absent in one- and two-species systems: a two-species system coupled to a third-species bath, and a connectivity scenario in which the fragmentation of a non-interacting pair of species is controlled by the remaining interspecies interaction. The paper also includes limiting-case analysis in Appendix A and a mean-field comparison in Appendix B.

Significance. If the central formulas are correct, the paper provides exact natural-orbital occupations and Gaussian densities for every species in a generic imbalanced three-species bosonic mixture, extending the authors' earlier two-species and balanced-multispecies work. The explicit closed forms allow systematic study of fragmentation as a function of all parameters, and the two applications demonstrate concrete phenomena unique to multiple-species mixtures. Strengths of the manuscript include the transparent derivation of the exact wavefunction and energy, the careful treatment of limiting cases in Appendix A, the mean-field comparison in Appendix B, and the absence of fitted parameters: all formulas are derived from the Hamiltonian rather than assumed.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II, Eq. (21)] The identity a1 a2 a3 + 2 b12 b13 b23 - (a1 b23^2 + a2 b13^2 + a3 b12^2) = m1 m2 m3 Omega+_123 Omega-_123 omega is introduced with the statement that it is arrived at by comparing normalizations, but no derivation is shown. This identity is load-bearing because it is used to simplify the fragmentation formula W1 in Eq. (29), and analogous formulas for W2 and W3. I request an explicit derivation, for example by showing that the left-hand side equals the determinant of the 3x3 center-of-mass coefficient matrix, or at minimum a symbolic verification in an appendix.
  2. [Section II, Eqs. (17), (25), (26)] There are index typos in central expressions: in Eq. (17) the exponent of Z_N3 uses a2 instead of a3, and in Eqs. (25) and (26) the Gaussian exponents of rho2 and rho3 use alpha_1 instead of alpha_2 and alpha_3, respectively. Given that the final fragmentation formulas (29)-(31) are highly index-sensitive, these typos must be corrected, and a systematic check of all species-index assignments should be provided.
  3. [Section III, Eq. (29)] The factorization of W1 into a product of two square roots is not derived. Equation (29) is not a direct rewrite of W1 = sqrt(alpha_1/(alpha_1 + C_{1,0,0})) from Eq. (24); it requires nontrivial algebra involving the eigenvector components and the frequencies Omega+_123, Omega-_123, and omega. Because the numerical depletion values reported in Section III, including the near-boundary values d1 = 0.8850, d2 = 0.9984, and d3 = 0.9978, are computed from this formula, I ask for a numerical or symbolic cross-check of Eq. (29) against direct diagonalization of the Gaussian one-particle density matrix at a generic parameter point, and at the near-boundary point of Section III.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section III, Eq. (29)] The text contains the typo 'paramters'; it should read 'parameters'.
  2. [Appendix B, Eqs. (B2), (B3)] In Eq. (B3) the prefactor of phi_3^GP uses Omega_1^GP, which should be Omega_3^GP. In Eq. (B2), the third Gross-Pitaevskii equation contains a mismatched variable in the term involving phi_1; the argument of phi_1 should be z rather than y', consistent with the other terms.
  3. [Section III, text after Eq. (29)] The statement that the formula describes 'all together twelve different parameters' should be clarified: the masses (3), particle numbers (3), and interaction strengths (6) are twelve parameters, but the trap frequency omega also enters the Hamiltonian, so the full parameter count is thirteen if omega is included.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the fragmentation formulas are derived from the Hamiltonian's exact diagonalization and are not assumed or fitted.

full rationale

The derivation chain runs from the Hamiltonian (1) through an exact diagonalization in Jacobi coordinates to the explicit wavefunction (13), followed by integration of the all-particle density to obtain the one-particle reduced density matrices (24)-(26) and their Mehler diagonalization in (29)-(31). Each quantity entering the final fragmentation formulas—Ω1, Ω2, Ω3, Ω±123, and the eigenvector components Δ(J)—is defined by diagonalizing the Hamiltonian's quadratic form, not fitted to any output. Identity (21), while not derived in the text, is stated as a normalization-consistency relation between two equivalent representations (13) and (17) and functions as an algebraic simplification, not as an assumed input equivalent to the fragmentation result. The self-citations to [35], [56], and [60] provide the two-species and balanced-mixture techniques and consistency checks, but the generic imbalanced three-species expressions (29)-(31) are obtained independently from the present paper's own diagonalization and integration steps. No parameter is fitted to depletion data, and no predicted quantity reduces by construction to an input. Accordingly there is no circular step; the algebraic typos and the unproved identity noted by a skeptical reader are correctness risks, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim is a parameter-free derivation from the Hamiltonian (1); no constants are fitted to data. The ledger records the mathematical tools and stability condition on which the closed forms rely. The unproved identity (21) is tracked as a red flag rather than as a free parameter because it is an algebraic assertion, not a fitted number.

assumptions (3)
  • standard math Mehler's formula for a Gaussian kernel is used to diagonalize each reduced one-particle density matrix.
    Invoked immediately before Eq. (27) to generate occupation numbers (1 - rho)^3 rho^n and the depletion fraction d = 1 - (1 - rho)^3.
  • standard math Jacobi coordinates (2) form an orthogonal transformation that exactly decouples relative and center-of-mass motion for quadratic pair interactions.
    Used in Section II to split the Hamiltonian (1) into H_rels and H_CMs; this is what makes the model solvable.
  • domain assumption The ground state is the product of ground harmonic-oscillator states of all normal modes; this requires all frequencies in (12) to be positive.
    The wavefunction (13) and the depletion formulas are only physical while the mixture is bound; Section III explores the stability boundary.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fragmentation of a trapped multiple-species bosonic mixture." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/A64COUXM

@misc{pith2026250612943,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fragmentation of a trapped multiple-species bosonic mixture},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/A64COUXM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.12943}
}
abstract

We consider a multiple-species mixture of interacting bosons, $N_1$ bosons of mass $m_1$, $N_2$ bosons of mass $m_2$, and $N_3$ bosons of mass $m_3$ in a harmonic trap of frequency $\omega$. The corresponding intraspecies interaction strengths are $\lambda_{11}$, $\lambda_{22}$, and $\lambda_{33}$, and the interspecies interaction strengths are $\lambda_{12}$, $\lambda_{13}$, and $\lambda_{23}$. When the shape of all interactions are harmonic, this is the generic multiple-species harmonic-interaction model which is exactly solvable. We start by solving the many-particle Hamiltonian and concisely discussing the ground-state wavefunction and energy in explicit forms as functions of all parameters, the masses, numbers of particles, and the intraspecies and interspecies interaction strengths. We then move to compute explicitly the reduced one-particle density matrices for all the species and diagonalize them, thus generalizing the treatment in [J. Chem. Phys. {\bf 161}, 184307 (2024)]. The respective eigenvalues determine the degree of fragmentation of each species. As applications, we focus on aspects that do not appear for the respective single-species and two-species systems. For instance, placing a mixture of two kinds of bosons in a bath made by a third kind, and controlling the fragmentation of the former by coupling to the latter. Another example exploits the possibility of different connectivities (i.e., which species interacts with which species) in the mixture, and demonstrates how the fragmentation of species $3$ can be manipulated by the interaction between species $1$ and species $2$, when species $3$ and $1$ do not interact with each other. We thereby highlight properties of fragmentation that only appear in the multiple-species mixture. Further applications are briefly discussed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.12943 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (Caption next page.) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (Previous page.) Fragmentation of a three-species b [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Fragmentation of a three-species bosonic mixture: E [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    0 [ σ (1) 1 = 0

    533(8), compare to their respective values for λ 12 = 0 . 0 [ σ (1) 1 = 0 . 6201, σ (1) 2 = 0 . 1038, and σ (1) 3 = 0 . 1153]. How close are we to the border of stability, i.e., when at least on e of the frequencies (5) and (7) becomes zero, also see (12), for λ 12 = − 3. 9 × 0. 001001611 ? The intraspecies relative-motion frequencies are found to be Ω 1 ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Girardeau, Simple and Generalized Condensation in Ma ny-Boson Systems, Phys

    M. Girardeau, Simple and Generalized Condensation in Ma ny-Boson Systems, Phys. of Fluids 5, 1468 (1962)

    work page 1962

  3. [3]

    Pollock, Quantization of Circulation in a Non-Ideal B ose Gas, Phys

    F. Pollock, Quantization of Circulation in a Non-Ideal B ose Gas, Phys. Fluids 10, 473 (1967)

    work page 1967

  4. [4]

    Nozi´ eres and D

    P. Nozi´ eres and D. Saint James, Particle vs. pair conden sation in attractive Bose liquids, J. Phys. (Paris) 43, 1133 (1982)

    work page 1982

  5. [5]

    Nozi´ eres, inBose-Einstein Condensation, edited by A

    P. Nozi´ eres, inBose-Einstein Condensation, edited by A. Griffin, D. W. Snoke, and S. Stringari (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996), p. 15

    work page 1996

  6. [6]

    R. W. Spekkens and J. E. Sipe, Spatial fragmentation of a B ose-Einstein condensate in a double-well potential, Phys. Rev. A 59, 3868 (1999)

    work page 1999

  7. [7]

    A. I. Streltsov, L. S. Cederbaum, and N. Moiseyev, Ground -state fragmentation of repulsive Bose-Einstein condensates in double-trap potentials, Phy s. Rev. A 70, 053607 (2004)

    work page 2004

  8. [8]

    E. J. Mueller, T.-L. Ho, M. Ueda, and G. Baym, Fragmentati on of Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A 74, 033612 (2006)

    work page 2006

Show all 65 references
  1. [9]

    O. E. Alon and L. S. Cederbaum, Pathway from Condensation via Fragmentation to Fermion- ization of Cold Bosonic Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 140402 (2005)

    2005

  2. [10]

    Bader and U

    P. Bader and U. R. Fischer, Fragmented Many-Body Ground S tates for Scalar Bosons in a Single Trap, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 060402 (2009)

    2009

  3. [11]

    Zhou and X

    Q. Zhou and X. Cui, Fate of a Bose-Einstein Condensate in the Presence of Spin-Orbit Cou- pling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 140407 (2013). 21

    2013

  4. [12]

    Kawaguchi, Goldstone-mode instability leading to f ragmentation in a spinor Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys

    Y. Kawaguchi, Goldstone-mode instability leading to f ragmentation in a spinor Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A 89, 033627 (2014)

    2014

  5. [13]

    Song, Y.-C

    S.-W. Song, Y.-C. Zhang, H. Zhao, X. Wang, and W.-M. Liu, Fragmentation of spin-orbit- coupled spinor Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A 89, 063613 (2014)

    2014

  6. [14]

    Kang and U

    M.-K. Kang and U. R. Fischer, Revealing Single-Trap Con densate Fragmentation by Measur- ing Density-Density Correlations after Time of Flight, Phy s. Rev. Lett. 113, 140404 (2014)

    2014

  7. [15]

    H. H. Jen and S.-K. Yip, Fragmented many-body states of a spin-2 Bose gas, Phys. Rev. A 91, 063603 (2015)

    2015

  8. [16]

    U. R. Fischer, A. U. J. Lode, and B. Chatterjee, Condensa te fragmentation as a sensitive measure of the quantum many-body behavior of bosons with lon g-range interactions, Phys. Rev. A 91, 063621 (2015)

    2015

  9. [17]

    A. U. J. Lode, Multiconfigurational time-dependent Har tree method for bosons with internal degrees of freedom: Theory and composite fragmentation of m ulticomponent Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A 93, 063601 (2016)

    2016

  10. [18]

    A. R. Kolovsky, Bogoliubov depletion of the fragmented condensate in the bosonic flux ladder, Phys. Rev. A 95, 033622 (2017)

    2017

  11. [19]

    A. U. J. Lode and C. Bruder, Fragmented Superradiance of a Bose-Einstein Condensate in an Optical Cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 013603 (2017)

    2017

  12. [20]

    A. U. J. Lode, F. S. Diorico, R. Wu, P. Molignini, L. Papariello, R. Lin, C. L´ evˆ eque, L. Exl, M. C. Tsatsos, R. Chitra, and N. J. Mauser, Many-body physics in two-component Bose–Einstein condensates in a cavity: fragmented superradiance and pola rization, New J. Phys. 20, ...

    2018

  13. [21]

    Tomchenko, On a Fragmented Condensate in a Uniform Bose System, J

    M. Tomchenko, On a Fragmented Condensate in a Uniform Bose System, J. Low Temp. Phys. 198, 100 (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    Lee and A

    J. Lee and A. Michelangeli, On the characterisation of fragmented Bose–Einstein condensation and its emergent effective evolution, Nonlinearity 36, 6364 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    Bhowmik and O

    A. Bhowmik and O. E. Alon, Interference of longitudinal and transversal fragmentations in the Josephson tunneling dynamics of Bose–Einstein condens ates, New J. Phys. 26, 123035 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    L¨ owdin, Quantum Theory of Many-Particle System s

    P.-O. L¨ owdin, Quantum Theory of Many-Particle System s. I. Physical Interpretations by Means of Density Matrices, Natural Spin-Orbitals, and Conv ergence Problems in the Method 22 of Configurational Interaction, Phys. Rev. 97, 1474 (1955)

    1955

  17. [25]

    A. J. Coleman and V. I. Yukalov, Reduced Density Matrices: Coulson ’s Challenge , Lectures Notes in Chemistry Vol. 72 (Springer, Berlin, 2000)

    2000

  18. [26]

    D. C. Roberts and M. Ueda, Stability analysis for n-component Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A 73, 053611 (2006)

    2006

  19. [27]

    Kr¨ onke, L

    S. Kr¨ onke, L. Cao, O. Vendrell, and P. Schmelcher, Non- equilibrium quantum dynamics of ultra-cold atomic mixtures: the multi-layer multi-confi guration time-dependent Hartree method for bosons, New J. Phys. 15 063018 (2013)

    2013

  20. [28]

    Mason and S

    P. Mason and S. A. Gardiner, Number-conserving approac hes to n-component Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A 89, 043617 (2014)

    2014

  21. [29]

    Barman and S

    A. Barman and S. Basu, Phase diagram of multi-component bosonic mixtures: emergence of mixed superfluid and insulating phases, J. Phys. B 48, 055301 (2015)

    2015

  22. [30]

    Y. Eto, M. Takahashi, K. Nabeta, R. Okada, M. Kunimi, H. S aito, and T. Hirano, Bouncing motion and penetration dynamics in multicomponent Bose-Ei nstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A 93, 033615 (2016)

    2016

  23. [31]

    Y. Z. He, Y. M. Liu, and C. G. Bao, Spin-structures of the B ose-Einstein condensates with three kinds of spin-1 atoms, Sci. Rep. 10, 2727 (2020)

    2020

  24. [32]

    Jimbo and H

    K. Jimbo and H. Saito, Surfactant behavior in three-com ponent Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A 103, 063323 (2021)

    2021

  25. [33]

    Y. Ma, C. Peng, and X. Cui, Borromean Droplet in Three-Co mponent Ultracold Bose Gases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 043002 (2021)

    2021

  26. [34]

    C. Liu, P. Chen, L. He, and F. Xu, Ground-state propertie s of multicomponent bosonic mixtures: A Gutzwiller mean-field study, Phys. Rev. A 108, 013309 (2023)

    2023

  27. [35]

    Saboo, S

    A. Saboo, S. Halder, S. Das, and S. Majumder, Rayleigh-T aylor instability in a phase- separated three-component Bose-Einstein condensate, Phy s. Rev. A 108, 013320 (2023)

    2023

  28. [36]

    O. E. Alon and L. S. Cederbaum, Properties of a trapped mu ltiple-species bosonic mixture at the infinite-particle-number limit: A solvable model, J. Ch em. Phys. 161, 184307 (2024)

    2024

  29. [37]

    Ma, T.-L

    Y. Ma, T.-L. Ho, and X. Cui, Shell-shaped quantum drople t in a three-component ultracold Bose gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 043402 (2025)

    2025

  30. [38]

    T. D. Anh-Tai, M. A. Garc´ ıa-March, T. Busch, and T. Foga rty, Quantum correlations and spatial localization in trapped one-dimensional ultra -cold Bose-Bose-Bose mixtures, 23 arXiv:2501.15358v3 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

  31. [39]

    Pruski, J

    S. Pruski, J. Ma´ ckowiak, and O. Missuno, Reduced density matrices of a system of N coupled oscillators. 2. Eigenstructure of the 1-particle matrix fo r the canonical ensemble, Rep. Math. Phys. 3, 227 (1972)

    1972

  32. [40]

    Pruski, J

    S. Pruski, J. Ma´ ckowiak, and O. Missuno, Reduced density matrices of a system of N coupled oscillators. 3. The eigenstructure of the p-particle matrix for the ground state, Rep. Math. Phys. 3, 241 (1972)

    1972

  33. [41]

    P. D. Robinson, Coupled oscillator natural orbitals, J . Chem. Phys. 66, 3307 (1977)

    1977

  34. [42]

    R. L. Hall, Some exact solutions to the translation-inv ariant N-body problem, J. Phys. A 11, 1227 (1978)

    1978

  35. [43]

    R. L. Hall, Exact solutions of Schr¨ odinger’s equationfor translation-invariant harmonic matter, J. Phys. A 11, 1235 (1978)

    1978

  36. [44]

    Cohen and C

    L. Cohen and C. Lee, Exact reduced density matrices for a model problem, J. Math. Phys. 26, 3105 (1985)

    1985

  37. [45]

    M. S. Osadchii and V. V. Muraktanov, The System of Harmon ically Interacting Particles: An Exact Solution of the Quantum-Mechanical Problem, Int. J. Q uant. Chem. 39, 173 (1991)

    1991

  38. [46]

    M. A. Za/suppress luska-Kotur, M. Gajda, A. Or/suppress lowski, and J. Mostowski, Soluble model of many interacting quantum particles in a trap, Phys. Rev. A 61, 033613 (2000)

    2000

  39. [47]

    Yan, Harmonic Interaction Model and Its Application s in Bose-Einstein Condensation, J

    J. Yan, Harmonic Interaction Model and Its Application s in Bose-Einstein Condensation, J. Stat. Phys. 113, 623 (2003)

    2003

  40. [48]

    Gajda, Criterion for Bose-Einstein condensation in a harmonic trap in the case with attractive interactions, Phys

    M. Gajda, Criterion for Bose-Einstein condensation in a harmonic trap in the case with attractive interactions, Phys. Rev. A 73, 023603 (2006)

    2006

  41. [49]

    J. R. Armstrong, N. T. Zinner, D. V. Fedorov, and A. S. Jen sen, Analytic harmonic approach to the N-body problem, J. Phys. B 44 055303, (2011)

    2011

  42. [50]

    J. R. Armstrong, N. T. Zinner, D. V. Fedorov, and A. S. Jen sen, Virial expansion coefficients in the harmonic approximation, Phys. Rev. E 86, 021115 (2012)

    2012

  43. [51]

    Ko´ scik and A

    P. Ko´ scik and A. Okopi´ nska, Correlation effects in the Moshinsky model, Few-Body Syst. 54, 1637 (2013)

    2013

  44. [52]

    Schilling, Natural orbitals and occupation numbers for harmonium: Fermions versus bosons, Phys

    C. Schilling, Natural orbitals and occupation numbers for harmonium: Fermions versus bosons, Phys. Rev. A 88, 042105 (2013)

    2013

  45. [53]

    P. A. Bouvrie, A. P. Majtey, M. C. Tichy, J. S. Dehesa, and A. R. Plastino, Entanglement 24 and the Born-Oppenheimer approximation in an exactly solvable quantum many-body system, Eur. Phys. J. D 68, 346 (2014)

    2014

  46. [54]

    C. L. Benavides-Riveros, I. V. Toranzo, and J. S. Dehesa , Entanglement in N-harmonium: bosons and fermions, J. Phys. B 47, 195503 (2014)

    2014

  47. [55]

    J. R. Armstrong, A. G. Volosniev, D. V. Fedorov, A. S. Jen sen, and N. T. Zinner, Analytic solutions of topologically disjoint systems, J. Phys. A 48, 085301 (2015)

    2015

  48. [56]

    Schilling and R

    C. Schilling and R. Schilling, Number-parity effect for c onfined fermions in one dimension, Phys. Rev. A 93, 021601(R) (2016)

    2016

  49. [57]

    O. E. Alon, Solvable model of a generic trapped mixture of interacting bosons: reduced density matrices and proof of Bose-Einstein condensation, J. Phys. A 50, 295002 (2017)

    2017

  50. [58]

    O. E. Alon, Solvable Model of a Generic Driven Mixture ofTrapped Bose-Einstein Condensates and Properties of a Many-Boson Floquet State at the Limit of an Infinite Number of Particles, Entropy 22, 1342 (2020)

    2020

  51. [59]

    O. E. Alon, Fragmentation of Identical and Distinguish able Bosons’ Pairs and Natural Gem- inals of a Trapped Bosonic Mixture, Atoms 9, 92 (2021)

    2021

  52. [60]

    O. E. Alon and L. S. Cederbaum, Effects Beyond Center-of-M ass Separability in a Trapped Bosonic Mixture: Exact Results, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 2249, 012011 (2022)

    2022

  53. [61]

    O. E. Alon and L. S. Cederbaum, Fragmentation of a trapped bosonic mixture, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 2494, 012014 (2023)

    2023

  54. [62]

    O. E. Alon and L. S. Cederbaum, Correlation Effects in a Trapped Bose-Fermi Mixture: Exact Results, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 2894, 012012 (2024)

    2024

  55. [63]

    O. E. Alon and L. S. Cederbaum, Entanglement and correla tions in an exactly-solvable model of a Bose-Einstein condensate in a cavity, J. Phys. A 57, 295305 (2024)

    2024

  56. [64]

    M. D. Jim´ enez, W. J. D´ ıaz, E. Cuestas, A. Vald´ es-Hern´ andez, and A. P. Majtey, Spatial cor- relations and entanglement in a hybrid system of N fermion pairs with harmonic interaction, J. Phys. A 58, 225303 (2025)

    2025

  57. [65]

    Kuro´ s, A

    A. Kuro´ s, A. Pieprzycki, E. Gawin, and P. Ko´ scik, Exact collective occupancies of the Moshin- sky model in two-dimensional geometry, arXiv:2502.06310v1 [quant-ph]. 25

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.