Some isolation and stability results for Einstein manifolds

Klaus Kroencke; Letizia Branca

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Some isolation and stability results for Einstein manifolds

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that non-flat Ricci-flat ALE Einstein metrics carry an explicit positive lower bound on their $L^{n/2}$ Weyl norm, that small Weyl norm forces stability, and that analogous Bochner-tensor pinching holds for…

desk verdict The ALE isolation theorems are genuinely new, but the displayed constant C(n) in the cubic Weyl estimate is negative for n≥6, so the central proof of Theorem 1.1 collapses as printed; a corrected rewrite is worth refereeing, not this version. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.13248 v2 pith:6QXDGWBU submitted 2025-06-16 math.DG

Letizia Branca , Klaus Kroencke This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.DG MSC 53C2553C2153C24

keywords EinsteinmanifoldsWeyltensorALEBochnerSasakieta-EinsteinstabilityofmetricsisolationresultsSobolevinequalities

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that, across several Einstein settings, curvature that is invisible to the Ricci tensor is still quantitatively constrained: either the space is a standard model, or a norm of the Weyl tensor (or its Hermitian and Sasakian analogues) is forced to be large. For Ricci-flat asymptotically locally Euclidean (ALE) manifolds it claims an isolation theorem: every non-flat example has a positive $L^{n/2}$ bound on the Weyl tensor, with an explicit constant depending on the dimension and the group at infinity, and a complementary stability theorem below a small-Weyl threshold. Similar $L^p$ stability criteria are proved for Poincaré–Einstein, compact Einstein, and compact Kähler–Einstein manifolds. For Kähler–Einstein and Sasaki $\eta$-Einstein manifolds, the paper gives Bochner and contact Bochner tensor pinching thresholds, with equality cases characterizing standard complex-projective or spherical models.

What carries the argument

The central object is the $L^{n/2}$ norm of the Weyl tensor, controlled through the Bochner–Weitzenböck formula $\tfrac12\Delta|W|^2=|\nabla W|^2+\tfrac{2S}{n}|W|^2-2Q$, the pointwise cubic estimate $Q\le C(n)|W|^3$, and a sharp Sobolev inequality whose constant contains the Euclidean volume ratio and the order $|\Gamma|$ of the group at infinity. A refined Kato inequality converts the Bochner formula into an estimate on $|\nabla |W|^q|$, and the same pattern—Bochner formula plus a sharp Sobolev or Yamabe-type inequality—is rerun with the Bochner tensor and the contact Bochner tensor, using a modified Yamabe invariant and D-homothetic deformations (the standard Sasakian rescaling that sends an $\eta$-Einstein metric to an Einstein metric) in the Sasaki case.

What would settle it

Evaluate the printed constant $C(n)=2+\tfrac12 n(n-1)-4\sqrt{n(n-1)(n+1)(n-2)}$ at $n=8$: it is negative, so the displayed inequality $Q\le C(n)|W|^3$ cannot be true for any metric with nonzero Weyl tensor. Finding a positive replacement constant and rerunning the proof of Theorem 1.1 would decide whether the isolation bound survives in dimensions $n\ge 8$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is Theorem 1.1: a Ricci-flat ALE manifold of dimension $n\ge 4$ is either flat or satisfies $\|W\|_{L^{n/2}}\ge \tfrac12\bigl(2-\tfrac{n+1}{n-1}\bigr)\Bigl[\bigl(\tfrac{1}{\sqrt{\pi n(n-2)}}\tfrac{\Gamma(n)}{\Gamma(n/2)}\bigr)^{1/n}\tfrac{1}{|\Gamma|}\Bigr]^{-2}C(n)^{-1}$, with the stated constants $C(4)=\sqrt6/4$, $C(6)=\sqrt{70}/(2\sqrt3)$, and the displayed formula for $n\ge 8$. In words, non-flat Ricci-flat ALE Einstein metrics are isolated from flat space by a definite amount of Weyl curvature. The paper then combines this with a sharp Sobolev inequality to prove that below a small-Weyl threshold the metric is stable, and in dimension six recasts the stability condition through the Gauss–Bonnet integrand, a boundary term, and the Euler characteristic. The same Bochner-inequality template is applied to Poincaré–Einstein, compact Einstein and Kähler–Einstein manifolds, and to Sasaki $\eta$-Einstein manifolds through the contact Bochner tensor.

Load-bearing premise

The proofs of the ALE theorems depend on two displayed estimates: the pointwise bound $Q\le C(n)|W|^3$ and the Sobolev constant's dependence on $|\Gamma|$; the first is negative for $n\ge 8$ as printed and the second is algebraically inconsistent with the volume ratio, so the quantitative ALE results would need corrected constants to stand.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Every non-flat Ricci-flat ALE Einstein metric has a uniformly positive Weyl $L^{n/2}$ norm; there is no degenerating family of such metrics approaching flat space with Weyl norm tending to zero.
For $n\ge 6$, metrics whose Weyl $L^{n/2}$ norm lies below the explicit threshold of Theorem 1.2 are stable, and strictly stable if the inequality is strict, so no infinitesimal Einstein deformations appear in the transverse-traceless directions.
In dimension six, stability can be read off from the Euler characteristic, the boundary term $I(S^5/\Gamma)$, and $\int_M \mathrm{tr}(W^3)\,dV_g$, by Theorem 1.3.
Poincaré–Einstein and compact Einstein or Kähler–Einstein metrics with sufficiently small $L^p$ Weyl or Bochner norm, for any $p>n/2$, are stable, with thresholds expressed through the Yamabe invariant, scalar curvature and volume.
Kähler–Einstein metrics with positive Yamabe invariant are either biholomorphically homothetic to $\mathbb{CP}^m$ with the Fubini–Study metric or satisfy $Y(M,[g])\le n\bigl(\int_M |B|^{n/2}|B|^{-n}\,dV_g\bigr)^{2/n}$, with equality forcing local symmetry; the Sasaki counterpart gives explicit lower bounds on the contact Bochner norm.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the constants in Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 are repaired, the two thresholds leave a quantitative gap for ALE Einstein metrics: non-flat spaces are separated from flat space in the Weyl functional, and the stable window sits just below that separation constant, with the same dependence on $n$ and $|\Gamma|$.
The same Bochner–Weitzenböck plus sharp-Sobolev template should transfer to other non-compact Einstein ends—conical, asymptotically complex hyperbolic, or finite-volume quotients—whenever a sharp Sobolev inequality with an explicit volume-growth constant is available.
The Sasaki theorem suggests that the contact Bochner tensor is the correct functional for a broader Sasaki isolation theory; its sharpness could be tested on symmetric Sasaki–Einstein examples where the Bochner norm can be computed explicitly.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

You should know this preprint has a real new idea but a load-bearing error in the displayed constants. The stress-test note is right: equation (2.3) defines C(n)=2+½n(n−1)−4√(n(n−2)(n−1)(n+1)), which is already negative at n=6, and the paper's own C(6) is positive. Since the proof of Theorem 1.1 multiplies by C(n), integrates, then divides by C(n), the derivation is invalid as written. The same bad expression appears in Corollary 5.2 and Theorem 1.9, so the Kähler and Sasaki isolation statements inherit the problem.

What is actually new: Theorems 1.1–1.4 give ALE isolation and stability criteria and a PE stability criterion that I have not seen before, and Theorems 1.6–1.7 extend Kröncke's L^∞ and L^{n/2} stability criteria to every p∈[n/2,∞] with the improved s(n) constant. The Bochner/contact Bochner pinching in Section 6 is a reasonable adaptation of the Branca–Catino–Dameno–Mastrolia technique. The structure is sensible and the literature engagement looks honest.

The soft spots are not minor. Besides C(n), equation (3.2) gets the group-order dependence wrong: the asymptotic volume ratio of R^n/Γ is 1/|Γ|, so D(n) should scale like |Γ|^{1/n}, not 1/|Γ|. That changes every ALE threshold in Theorems 1.1–1.3. Theorem 1.1 claims n≥4, but the proof treats n≥6 and n=4 and skips n=5. The constant in the theorem statement also does not match the one derived in (3.6); the proof gives coefficient 1/(2q), while the statement appears to use q/2. The n=4 limiting argument sending δ→0 is sketchy if |W|^{2q} is not in L^2. These are all load-bearing because they enter the paper's principal novelty.

What holds up: the compact Einstein stability proof in Theorem 1.6 follows an established pattern and the algebra there appears consistent, as does the PE argument in Section 4. The Sasaki result becomes a direct combination of [7] and [33] once the constant typo is fixed. So the paper is not hopeless; it is a preprint with fixable but central errors.

For you: I would not cite this version, and I would not use it as a clean reading-group example. But I would send it to a serious referee rather than desk-reject it: the new results are real, the framework is coherent, and a referee could force a corrected rewrite with the right constants, the n=5 case, and a clean statement of Theorem 1.1.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper claims new isolation and stability results for Einstein manifolds in four settings: compact, asymptotically hyperbolic (AH), and asymptotically locally Euclidean (ALE) manifolds, plus compact Kähler–Einstein and Sasaki η-Einstein manifolds. The central result, Theorem 1.1, asserts that a Ricci-flat ALE manifold of dimension n≥4 is either flat or has an explicit lower bound on the L^{n/2} norm of the Weyl tensor, with constants depending on n, the group order |Γ|, and a constant C(n) appearing in the pointwise estimate Q≤C(n)|W|^3. Theorems 1.2–1.4 and 1.6–1.7 give stability criteria for ALE, AH, compact Einstein, and compact Kähler–Einstein metrics in terms of Weyl or Bochner tensor norms. Theorems 1.8 and 1.9 give pinching results for the Bochner and contact Bochner tensors. The proofs combine Bochner–Weitzenböck formulas, Sobolev inequalities, refined Kato inequalities, and the Einstein operator formalism.

Significance. If correct, Theorem 1.1 would be a striking quantitative rigidity statement: every non-flat Ricci-flat ALE Einstein metric would carry a uniformly positive amount of Weyl curvature, and the complementary stability threshold in Theorem 1.2 would be a natural small-Weyl stability gap. The paper is also commendable for making all constants explicit and for extending known L∞ and L^{n/2} stability criteria to general L^p. However, the central constant C(n) in the pointwise cubic estimate is negative for the dimensions in which it is used, which invalidates the derivation of Theorem 1.1 and the related results that inherit the same constant. As a consequence, the main ALE isolation claim is not established as printed.

major comments (3)

[§2, Eq. (2.3)] The stated constant C(n)=2+1/2 n(n−1)−4√(n(n−2)(n−1)(n+1)) is negative for every n≥6; for example, at n=6 it is approximately −98.9, contradicting the paper's own positive value C(6)=√70/(2√3), and at n=8 it is approximately −190. A pointwise inequality Q≤C(n)|W|^3 with a negative constant cannot hold on a manifold with W≠0, since the right-hand side is negative. The proof of Theorem 1.1 uses this estimate to replace −4q|W|^{2q−2}Q by −4q C(n)|W|^{2q+1} and then divides by C(n) in (3.6); with C(n)<0, both steps are invalid and the threshold in Theorem 1.1 is vacuous. The same erroneous constant reappears in Corollary 5.2 and in Theorem 1.9, so the Kähler and Sasaki isolation results inherit the problem.
[§3, Eq. (3.2)] The scaling of the Sobolev constant D(n) with the group order is algebraically inconsistent. The asymptotic volume ratio of R^n/Γ is A_VR=1/|Γ|, so Theorem 2.6 gives a factor (A_VR)^{−1/n}=|Γ|^{1/n}. The displayed equality D(n)=1/√(π n(n−2)) (Γ(n)/Γ(n/2))^{1/n} · 1/|Γ| in (3.2) therefore has the wrong power of |Γ|. This changes the group-order dependence of the thresholds in Theorems 1.1–1.3 and must be corrected before the quantitative ALE statements can be accepted.
[§3, proof of Theorem 1.1] Theorem 1.1 is stated for all n≥4, but the proof treats only the cases n≥6 and n=4. No argument is given for n=5, and the constant list in the theorem omits C(5) even though (2.3) records C(5)=4√10. Since the decay estimate in (3.5) also works at n=5, this appears to be a fixable omission, but as printed the theorem's dimension range is not covered by the proof.

minor comments (4)

[§2.3, Definition 2.9] In the coordinate formula for the Bochner tensor, the term R_{kj}g_{il} appears twice; one occurrence is presumably a typo for a different index pairing such as R_{il}g_{kj}.
[§2.3, Eq. (2.10)] The symbol B is used both for the Bochner tensor and for the cubic term in (2.9), and the displayed inequality |B|≤3(m^2−2)/(m√(m^2−1)) appears to omit a factor involving |B|^3 or a similar power; as written it is not scale-invariant and is hard to interpret.
[§3.1] The sentence beginning "Given a closed a closed Riemannian manifold" contains a duplicated article.
[References] Reference [40] lacks publication data; the entry should include the journal, volume, and year.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; derivation uses external published estimates and no fitted-input or definitional reductions.

full rationale

The paper's derivations proceed by combining external Bochner-Weitzenbock formulas (2.3), (2.9), the pointwise eigenvalue estimate (1.1) from Huisken, the sharp Sobolev inequality of Kristaly, and the closed-manifold pinching theorem Corollary 1.2 of Branca-Catino-Dameno-Mastrolia. The target theorems (1.1)-(1.3) are inequalities for ||W||_{L^{n/2}} on ALE manifolds obtained by applying these estimates to |W|^q; no parameter is fitted to data that the theorem then predicts, and no target quantity is defined in terms of its own output. Theorems 1.8 and 1.9 borrow the technique and constants from [7] and [33]; although [7] shares an author, it is cited as a published, parameter-free external result with stated assumptions (closed Einstein manifolds with positive Yamabe invariant) that do not include the present target quantities, so it counts as independent support under the review rules rather than as a circular chain. The reader-flagged issues with the displayed constant C(n) in (2.3) and the |Gamma|-scaling in (3.2) are mathematical correctness objections, not instances of self-referential derivation; a negative constant would make the proof invalid but would not make it circular. No circular step is therefore exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The results rest on established Bochner-Weitzenböck formulas, sharp Sobolev inequalities, and stability machinery from prior literature. No free parameters are fitted to data and no new geometric or physical entities are introduced. The main cost is the correctness of the cited constants, and the printed C(n) and D(n) expressions appear to be erroneous.

assumptions (8)

domain assumption Theorem 2.6 sharp Sobolev inequality for complete noncompact manifolds with Ric >= 0 and Euclidean volume growth, from [37].
Used to derive inequality (3.1) in the proof of Theorem 1.1 and to establish the stability threshold in Theorem 1.2.
standard math Bochner-Weitzenböck formula for the Weyl tensor on Einstein manifolds: (1/2) Delta |W|^2 = |nabla W|^2 + (2S/n)|W|^2 - 2Q.
Starting point for all Weyl isolation and stability results, stated in Section 2.
domain assumption Cubic estimate Q <= C(n)|W|^3 with the constants collected from [31] and related papers.
Load-bearing for Theorem 1.1. As printed, C(n) is negative for n >= 8, so the assumption fails as written.
standard math Refined Kato inequality |nabla |W|| <= sqrt((n-1)/(n+1)) |nabla W| on Einstein manifolds, and the analogous inequality |nabla B|^2 >= (m+3)/(m+1) |nabla |B||^2 for Kähler-Einstein manifolds.
Used in the gradient estimates in Theorems 1.1 and 1.8, with references to [2] and [31].
domain assumption Density of compactly supported smooth functions in H^2_1(M) on ALE manifolds, from Theorem 2.7 of [29].
Needed to apply the Sobolev inequality (3.1) to functions |W|^q that are not compactly supported.
domain assumption For PE manifolds with positive Yamabe invariant, the Sobolev inequality (4.2) and the lower bound lambda_0 >= n(n-2)/4 on the bottom of the L^2 spectrum.
Basis of the proof of Theorem 1.4, combining the conformal Sobolev inequality with the negative scalar curvature of PE metrics.
domain assumption Existence of a metric realizing the minimum of the modified Yamabe invariant Y^t, via an adaptation of [46, Proposition 4.4], and Obata's theorem for conformal transformations.
Used in the proof of Theorem 1.8 to identify the equality case as locally symmetric.
domain assumption D-homothetic deformation relation B_alpha = W_alpha and the norm identity (6.8) from [33].
Used in the proof of Theorem 1.9 to transfer Weyl isolation results to the contact Bochner tensor.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Some isolation and stability results for Einstein manifolds." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6QXDGWBU

@misc{pith2026250613248,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Some isolation and stability results for Einstein manifolds},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6QXDGWBU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.13248}
}

abstract

We prove new isolation and stability results for Einstein manifolds in a variety of settings. Imposing conditions on the Weyl tensor, we establish new stability criteria for compact, asymptotically hyperbolic (AH) and asymptotically locally Euclidean (ALE) manifolds and an isolation result in the latter setting. For compact K\"ahler and Sasaki $\eta$-Einstein manifolds, we provide similar results which involve the Bochner tensor and the contact Bochner tensor, respectively.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Einstein metrics, their moduli spaces and stability
math.DG 2025-07 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

A survey showing that stability and infinitesimal deformability of Einstein metrics both reduce to the spectrum of the Lichnerowicz Laplacian, with a compendium of known results and open questions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[7]

Branca, G

L. Branca, G. Catino, D. Dameno, and P. Mastrolia. Rigidity of Einstein manifolds with positive Yamabe invariant.Ann. Glob. Anal. Geom., 67(4):21, 2025

work page 2025
[33]

Itoh and D

M. Itoh and D. Kobayashi. Isolation theorems of the Bochner curvature type tensors.Tokyo J. Math., 27(1):227–237, 2004

work page 2004
[1]

Aubin.Some nonlinear problems in Riemannian geometry

T. Aubin.Some nonlinear problems in Riemannian geometry. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998

work page 1998
[2]

Bando, A

S. Bando, A. Kasue, and H. Nakajima. On a construction of coordinates at infinity on manifolds with fast curvature decay and maximal volume growth.Invent. Math., 97(2):313–349, 1989

work page 1989
[3]

A. L. Besse.Einstein manifolds. Classics in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2008. Reprint of the 1987 edition

2008
[4]

S. Bochner. Curvature and Betti numbers. II.Ann. of Math. (2), 50:77–93, 1949

work page 1949
[5]

C. B¨ ohm. Unstable Einstein metrics.Math. Z., 250(2):279–286, 2005

work page 2005
[6]

Bour and G

V. Bour and G. Carron. Optimal integral pinching results.Ann. Sci. ´Ec. Norm. Sup´ er. (4), 48(1):41–70, 2015

2015

Show all 61 references

[8]

Cao and C

H.-D. Cao and C. He. Linear stability of Perelman’sν-entropy on symmetric spaces of compact type. J. Reine Angew. Math., 709:229–246, 2015

2015
[9]

E. Cartan. Sur une classe remarquable d’espaces de Riemann. I.Bull. Soc. Math. France, 54:214–216, 1926

1926
[10]

E. Cartan. Sur une classe remarquable d’espaces de Riemann. II.Bull. Soc. Math. France, 55:114–134, 1927

1927
[11]

Catino and P

G. Catino and P. Mastrolia.A perspective on canonical Riemannian metrics, volume 336 ofProgress in Mathematics. Birkh¨ auser/Springer, Cham, [2020]©2020

2020
[12]

Catino and C

G. Catino and C. B. Ndiaye. Integral pinching results for manifolds with boundary.Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5), 9(4):785–813, 2010

2010
[13]

S. Chern. On the curvatura integra in a Riemannian manifold.Ann. of Math. (2), 46:674–684, 1945

1945
[14]

Chong, Y

T. Chong, Y. Dong, H. Lin, and Y. Ren. Rigidity theorems of complete K¨ ahler-Einstein manifolds and complex space forms.Acta Math. Sci. Ser. B (Engl. Ed.), 39(2):339–356, 2019

2019
[15]

X. Dai, X. Wang, and G. Wei. On the stability of Riemannian manifold with parallel spinors.Invent. Math., 161(1):151–176, 2005

2005
[16]

X. Dai, X. Wang, and G. Wei. On the variational stability of K¨ ahler-Einstein metrics.Comm. Anal. Geom., 15(4):669–693, 2007

2007
[17]

Dai and G

X. Dai and G. Wei. Hitchin-Thorpe inequality for noncompact Einstein 4-manifolds.Adv. Math., 214(2):551–570, 2007

2007
[18]

Eguchi and A

T. Eguchi and A. J. Hanson. Self-dual solutions to Euclidean gravity.Ann. Phys., 120(1):82–106, 1979

1979
[19]

Gibbons and S

G. Gibbons and S. A. Hartnoll. Gravitational instability in higher dimensions.Phys. Rev. D (3), 66(6):064024, 17, 2002

2002
[20]

G. W. Gibbons, S. A. Hartnoll, and C. N. Pope. Bohm and Einstein-Sasaki metrics, black holes, and cosmological event horizons.Phys. Rev. D (3), 67(8):084024, 24, 2003

2003
[21]

C. R. Graham and J. M. Lee. Einstein metrics with prescribed conformal infinity on the ball.Adv. Math., 87(2):186–225, 1991

1991
[22]

D. J. Gross, M. J. Perry, and L. G. Yaffe. Instability of flat space at finite temperature.Phys. Rev. D (3), 25(2):330–355, 1982

1982
[23]

S. S. Gubser and I. Mitra. Some interesting violations of the Breitenlohner-Freedman bound.J. High Energy Phys., (7):044, 15, 2002. 36

2002
[24]

M. J. Gursky. The Weyl functional, de Rham cohomology, and K¨ ahler-Einstein metrics.Ann. of Math. (2), 148(1):315–337, 1998

1998
[25]

M. J. Gursky. Conformal vector fields on four-manifolds with negative scalar curvature.Math. Z., 232(2):265–273, 1999

1999
[26]

M. J. Gursky. Four-manifolds withδW + = 0 and Einstein constants of the sphere.Math. Ann., 318(3):417–431, 2000

2000
[27]

M. J. Gursky and C. Lebrun. On Einstein manifolds of positive sectional curvature.Ann. Glob. Anal. Geom., 17(4):315–328, 1999

1999
[28]

S. Hall, R. Haslhofer, and M. Siepmann. The stability inequality for Ricci-flat cones.J. Geom. Anal., 24(1):472–494, 2014

2014
[29]

Hebey.Sobolev spaces on Riemannian manifolds, volume 1635 ofLecture Notes in Mathematics

E. Hebey.Sobolev spaces on Riemannian manifolds, volume 1635 ofLecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1996

1996
[30]

Hebey and M

E. Hebey and M. Vaugon. EffectiveL p pinching for the concircular curvature.J. Geom. Anal., 6(4):531– 553, 1996

1996
[31]

G. Huisken. Ricci deformation of the metric on a Riemannian manifold.J. Diff. Geom., 21(1):47–62, 1985

1985
[32]

M. Itoh. Self-duality of K¨ ahler surfaces.Compos. Math., 51(2):265–273, 1984

1984
[34]

Kobayashi

O. Kobayashi. On a conformally invariant functional of the space of Riemannian metrics.J. Math. Soc. Japan, 37(3):373–389, 1985

1985
[35]

N. Koiso. Non-deformability of Einstein metrics.Osaka Math. J., 15(2):419–433, 1978

1978
[36]

N. Koiso. Rigidity and stability of Einstein metrics—the case of compact symmetric spaces.Osaka Math. J., 17(1):51–73, 1980

1980
[37]

Krist´ aly

A. Krist´ aly. Sharp Sobolev inequalities on noncompact Riemannian manifolds with Ric≥0 via optimal transport theory.Calc. Var. Part. Differ. Equ., 63(8):Paper No. 200, 25, 2024

2024
[38]

Kr¨ oncke

K. Kr¨ oncke. On the stability of Einstein manifolds.Ann. Glob. Anal. Geom., 47(1):81–98, 2015

2015
[39]

Kr¨ oncke

K. Kr¨ oncke. Stable and unstable Einstein warped products.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 369(9):6537–6563, 2017

2017
[40]

Kr¨ oncke and U

K. Kr¨ oncke and U. Semmelmann. On stability and scalar curvature rigidity of quaternion-k¨ ahler mani- folds
[41]

Kr¨ oncke and A

K. Kr¨ oncke and A. Szab´ o. Optimal coordinates for Ricci-flat conifolds.Calc. Var. Part. Differ. Equ., 63(7):Paper No. 188, 41, 2024

2024
[42]

P. B. Kronheimer. The construction of ALE spaces as hyper-K¨ ahler quotients.J. Diff. Geom., 29(3):665– 683, 1989

1989
[43]

C. LeBrun. Weyl curvature, Del Pezzo surfaces, and almost-K¨ ahler geometry.J. Geom. Anal., 25(3):1744–1772, 2015

2015
[44]

J. M. Lee. The spectrum of an asymptotically hyperbolic Einstein manifold.Comm. Anal. Geom., 3(1-2):253–271, 1995

1995
[45]

J. M. Lee. Fredholm operators and Einstein metrics on conformally compact manifolds.Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., 183(864):vi+83, 2006

2006
[46]

J. M. Lee and T. H. Parker. The Yamabe problem.Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.), 17(1):37–91, 1987

1987
[47]

R. Mazzeo. Unique continuation at infinity and embedded eigenvalues for asymptotically hyperbolic manifolds.Amer. J. Math., 113(1):25–45, 1991

1991
[48]

Y. Muto. On Einstein metrics.J. Diff. Geom., 9:521–530, 1974. 37

1974
[49]

Nakajima

H. Nakajima. Self-duality of ALE Ricci-flat 4-manifolds and positive mass theorem. InRecent topics in differential and analytic geometry, volume 18-I ofAdv. Stud. Pure Math., pages 385–396. Academic Press, Boston, MA, 1990

1990
[50]

M. Obata. The conjectures on conformal transformations of Riemannian manifolds.J. Diff. Geom., 6:247–258, 1971/72

1971
[51]

D. N. Page and C. N. Pope. Stability analysis of compactifications ofD= 11 supergravity with SU(3)× SU(2)×U(1) symmetry.Phys. Lett. B, 145(5-6):337–341, 1984

1984
[52]

D. N. Page and C. N. Pope. Which compactifications ofD= 11 supergravity are stable?Phys. Lett. B, 144(5-6):346–350, 1984

1984
[53]

Rosenberg

S. Rosenberg. On the Gauss-Bonnet theorem for complete manifolds.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 287(2):745–753, 1985

1985
[54]

M. A. Singer. Positive Einstein metrics with smallL n/2-norm of the Weyl tensor.Diff. Geom. Appl., 2(3):269–274, 1992

1992
[55]

Tachibana

S. Tachibana. On the Bochner curvature tensor.Natur. Sci. Rep. Ochanomizu Univ., 18:15–19, 1967

1967
[56]

Tachibana

S. Tachibana. A theorem on Riemannian manifolds of positive curvature operator.Proc. Japan Acad., 50:301–302, 1974

1974
[57]

H. Tran. On closed manifolds with harmonic Weyl curvature.Adv. Math., 322:861–891, 2017

2017
[58]

Tricerri and L

F. Tricerri and L. Vanhecke. Curvature tensors on almost Hermitian manifolds.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 267(2):365–397, 1981

1981
[59]

M. Y. Wang. Preserving parallel spinors under metric deformations.Indiana Univ. Math. J., 40(3):815– 844, 1991

1991
[60]

C. Warnick. Semi-classical stability of AdS NUT instantons.Class. Quantum Grav., 23(11):3801–3817, 2006

2006
[61]

C. Zhu. The gauss-bonnet theorem and its applications.University of California, Berkeley, USA, 2000. (Letizia Branca)Dipartimento di Matematica, Universit `a degli Studi di Milano, Via Saldini 50, 20133, Milano, Italy. Email address:letizia.branca@unimi.it (Klaus Kr¨ oncke)Ins...

2000

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [7]

Branca, G

L. Branca, G. Catino, D. Dameno, and P. Mastrolia. Rigidity of Einstein manifolds with positive Yamabe invariant.Ann. Glob. Anal. Geom., 67(4):21, 2025

work page 2025

[2] [33]

Itoh and D

M. Itoh and D. Kobayashi. Isolation theorems of the Bochner curvature type tensors.Tokyo J. Math., 27(1):227–237, 2004

work page 2004

[3] [1]

Aubin.Some nonlinear problems in Riemannian geometry

T. Aubin.Some nonlinear problems in Riemannian geometry. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998

work page 1998

[4] [2]

Bando, A

S. Bando, A. Kasue, and H. Nakajima. On a construction of coordinates at infinity on manifolds with fast curvature decay and maximal volume growth.Invent. Math., 97(2):313–349, 1989

work page 1989

[5] [3]

A. L. Besse.Einstein manifolds. Classics in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2008. Reprint of the 1987 edition

2008

[6] [4]

S. Bochner. Curvature and Betti numbers. II.Ann. of Math. (2), 50:77–93, 1949

work page 1949

[7] [5]

C. B¨ ohm. Unstable Einstein metrics.Math. Z., 250(2):279–286, 2005

work page 2005

[8] [6]

Bour and G

V. Bour and G. Carron. Optimal integral pinching results.Ann. Sci. ´Ec. Norm. Sup´ er. (4), 48(1):41–70, 2015

2015