pith. sign in

arxiv: 2506.13371 · v3 · submitted 2025-06-16 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.atom-ph· physics.optics

Excitation-pulse intensity mediated control of coherent nonlinear optical response of a V-type system

Rishabh Tripathi , Krishna K. Maurya , Rohan Singh This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 09:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.atom-phphysics.optics
keywords V-type systemnonlinear optical responsetwo-dimensional spectroscopyoptical Bloch equationsfemtosecond pulsesquantum pathwayspulse intensity controlcoherent dynamics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Varying the intensity of excitation pulses allows selective control over quantum pathways in the nonlinear optical response of a V-type three-level system.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper explores the coherent evolution of a V-type three-level system, in which two excited states share a common ground state, when driven by strong femtosecond pulses. Numerical solutions of the optical Bloch equations reveal that this evolution hinges on the product of pulse duration and the energy separation between the excited states. Building on that, the work shows that adjusting pulse intensity can turn individual spectral features on or off in simulated two-dimensional coherent spectra, with each feature tied to a distinct quantum pathway. A sympathetic reader would care because such control offers a straightforward way to manipulate coherent light-matter interactions in atoms, molecules, or semiconductor nanostructures. The approach also allows precise tuning of the phases of those spectral peaks.

Core claim

In a V-type three-level system under strong femtosecond-pulse excitation, the coherent evolution depends critically on the product of the excitation-pulse duration and the energy separation between the excited states. Numerical solution of the optical Bloch equations in the high-intensity regime shows that varying the excitation-pulse intensity controls the contributions of different quantum pathways to the nonlinear optical response. This enables selective turning on or off of individual spectral features in the 2D spectra, each corresponding to distinct quantum pathways, and precise adjustment of the phase of these peaks.

What carries the argument

Numerical simulation of the optical Bloch equations for a V-type system driven by intense pulses, used to generate 2D coherent spectra and demonstrate intensity-dependent pathway selection.

If this is right

  • Selective activation or suppression of specific spectral features in 2D spectra linked to particular quantum pathways.
  • Precise phase adjustment of peaks through changes in pulse intensity.
  • Application of this control to coherent response in atomic gases and semiconductor nanostructures.
  • Provision of a simple framework for intensity-mediated control in multilevel quantum systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This intensity control might generalize to other three-level or multilevel configurations not studied in the paper.
  • Comparing these simulations to real experiments could reveal the impact of unmodeled decoherence or broadening effects.
  • Such control could be tested in actual 2D spectroscopy setups with femtosecond lasers on suitable V-type samples like atoms or quantum dots.
  • Extending the model to include inhomogeneous broadening might show how robust the intensity control remains in realistic conditions.

Load-bearing premise

The numerical solution of the optical Bloch equations in the high-intensity regime captures all relevant coherent dynamics without decoherence, inhomogeneous broadening, or higher-order effects present in real systems.

What would settle it

An experiment on a physical V-type system, such as an atomic vapor or semiconductor nanostructure, where changing the excitation pulse intensity fails to selectively turn spectral features on or off in measured 2D coherent spectra as predicted by the simulations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.13371 by Krishna K. Maurya, Rishabh Tripathi, Rohan Singh.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) The energy levels in a V-type system, illustrat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Illustration of the population dynamics of the three [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Single-pulse excitation of a V-level system. Popula [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Pulse scheme used in simulations. Delays between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Simulated rephasing 2D spectra for V-level system in the perturbative regime. (b) Normalized pulse spectrum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Variation in the maximum amplitudes of each peak [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Simulated rephasing 2D spectra demonstrating Co [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. 2D spectra with amplitude normalized to the global [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Effect of varying [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

V-type three-level systems, where two excited states share a common ground state, serve as fundamental models for exploring coherent light-matter interactions in a range of quantum systems, from atomic gases to semiconductor nanostructures. In this work, we investigate the coherent evolution of such a system under strong femtosecond-pulse excitation by numerically solving the optical Bloch equations. Our analysis shows that the coherent evolution of a three-level system critically depends on the product of the excitation-pulse duration and energy separation between the excited states. Building on this understanding, we extend our analysis to simulate two-dimensional coherent spectra in a high-intensity regime. We demonstrate a control over the coherent pathway contributions to the nonlinear optical response of a V-type system by varying the intensity of the excitation pulses. This control is manifested through the ability to selectively turn individual spectral features on or off in the 2D spectra, each corresponding to distinct quantum pathways. Furthermore, the pulse intensities are varied to precisely adjust the phase of these peaks. Our approach provides a simple and robust framework for achieving control of coherent response of multilevel systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript numerically solves the optical Bloch equations for a V-type three-level system under strong femtosecond-pulse excitation. It reports that coherent evolution depends on the product of pulse duration and excited-state energy separation, and extends this to 2D coherent spectra in the high-intensity regime. The central claim is that varying excitation-pulse intensity selectively turns individual spectral features (corresponding to distinct Liouville pathways) on or off and adjusts their phases.

Significance. If the numerical results hold under realistic conditions, the work supplies a simple intensity-based knob for pathway-selective control of nonlinear optical response in multilevel systems. This could inform coherent-control strategies in atomic gases and semiconductor nanostructures, with the 2D-spectra simulations providing concrete, falsifiable predictions for experiment.

major comments (2)
  1. [Numerical Methods] The numerical integration of the optical Bloch equations lacks reported convergence checks, time-step criteria, or comparisons to analytic perturbative limits. Because the on/off pathway control is demonstrated exclusively via these high-intensity simulations, insufficient validation undermines confidence in the quantitative results (see Numerical Methods and Results sections).
  2. [2D Spectra Simulations] The model incorporates only homogeneous decay rates and fixed detunings; inhomogeneous broadening (Doppler, strain, or size dispersion) present in the cited physical systems is omitted. Convolution with a realistic frequency distribution would smear the frequency-resolved peaks, potentially eliminating the reported ability to turn individual pathway contributions completely on or off by intensity alone (see 2D Spectra Simulations and Discussion).
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that evolution 'critically depends on the product of the excitation-pulse duration and energy separation' but does not give the explicit functional form or equation reference.
  2. [Figure captions] Figure captions and text should explicitly map each labeled spectral peak to its corresponding Liouville pathway for immediate readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review. The comments highlight important aspects of numerical validation and model realism that we address below. We have revised the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of the results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Numerical Methods] The numerical integration of the optical Bloch equations lacks reported convergence checks, time-step criteria, or comparisons to analytic perturbative limits. Because the on/off pathway control is demonstrated exclusively via these high-intensity simulations, insufficient validation undermines confidence in the quantitative results (see Numerical Methods and Results sections).

    Authors: We agree that explicit validation of the numerical scheme is necessary. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated subsection in Numerical Methods that reports the time-step size used, the convergence tests performed by successive halving of the step size, and the criterion for acceptable error (change in population and coherence below 10^{-6}). We have also included direct comparisons of the simulated third-order response to the analytic perturbative limit at low pulse intensities, confirming quantitative agreement. These additions are now referenced in the Results section as well. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [2D Spectra Simulations] The model incorporates only homogeneous decay rates and fixed detunings; inhomogeneous broadening (Doppler, strain, or size dispersion) present in the cited physical systems is omitted. Convolution with a realistic frequency distribution would smear the frequency-resolved peaks, potentially eliminating the reported ability to turn individual pathway contributions completely on or off by intensity alone (see 2D Spectra Simulations and Discussion).

    Authors: We acknowledge that the simulations are performed in the homogeneous limit. This choice isolates the coherent pathway interference that is the central focus of the work. In the revised Discussion we now explicitly address inhomogeneous broadening, noting that for narrow distributions (e.g., cold atomic gases) the intensity-mediated on/off switching remains observable, while broader distributions convert the complete suppression into a strong modulation of peak amplitudes. We have added a brief analytic estimate of the smearing effect and a statement that full quantitative modeling of specific experimental inhomogeneities lies beyond the scope of the present idealized study. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Numerical integration of optical Bloch equations produces pathway-selective spectra without definitional or self-referential reduction

full rationale

The paper obtains its central results by direct numerical solution of the optical Bloch equations for a V-type three-level system, varying only the pulse intensity parameter while holding other inputs fixed. No parameters are fitted to the target 2D spectra, no output quantity is redefined in terms of itself, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported via self-citation. The reported ability to turn spectral features on or off therefore follows from integrating the governing equations rather than from any tautological mapping of inputs to outputs. The derivation chain remains independent of the claimed conclusions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model rests on the standard optical Bloch equations for a closed three-level system and on the assumption that intensity variation alone is sufficient to isolate pathway contributions.

free parameters (1)
  • excitation-pulse intensity
    Varied parametrically to demonstrate control; specific values chosen for the simulations.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The V-type system is accurately described by the optical Bloch equations in the coherent regime without additional relaxation or dephasing channels.
    Invoked throughout the numerical evolution and 2D spectrum calculation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5726 in / 1301 out tokens · 52618 ms · 2026-05-19T09:42:13.572701+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    P. Chen, C. Piermarocchi, and L. J. Sham, Control of exciton dynamics in nanodots for quantum operations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 067401 (2001)

    work page 2001

  2. [2]

    Biolatti, R

    E. Biolatti, R. C. Iotti, P. Zanardi, and F. Rossi, Quantum information processing with semiconductor macroatoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5647 (2000)

    work page 2000

  3. [3]

    B. J. Sussman, M. Y. Ivanov, and A. Stolow, Nonper- turbative quantum control via the nonresonant dynamic stark effect, Phys. Rev. A 71, 051401 (2005)

    work page 2005

  4. [4]

    Monmayrant, B

    A. Monmayrant, B. Chatel, and B. Girard, Quantum state measurement using coherent transients, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 103002 (2006)

    work page 2006

  5. [5]

    Assion, T

    A. Assion, T. Baumert, M. Bergt, T. Brixner, B. Kiefer, V. Seyfried, M. Strehle, and G. Gerber, Control of chem- ical reactions by feedback-optimized phase-shaped fem- tosecond laser pulses, Science 282, 919 (1998)

    work page 1998

  6. [6]

    T. C. Weinacht, J. Ahn, and P. H. Bucksbaum, Control- ling the shape of a quantum wavefunction, Nature 397, ix 233 (1999)

    work page 1999

  7. [7]

    Kamada, H

    H. Kamada, H. Gotoh, J. Temmyo, T. Takagahara, and H. Ando, Exciton rabi oscillation in a single quantum dot, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 246401 (2001)

    work page 2001

  8. [8]

    Viasnoff-Schwoob, C

    E. Viasnoff-Schwoob, C. Weisbuch, H. Benisty, S. Olivier, S. Varoutsis, I. Robert-Philip, R. Houdr´ e, and C. J. M. Smith, Spontaneous emission enhancement of quantum dots in a photonic crystal wire, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 183901 (2005)

    work page 2005

  9. [9]

    Borri, W

    P. Borri, W. Langbein, S. Schneider, U. Woggon, R. L. Sellin, D. Ouyang, and D. Bimberg, Rabi oscillations in the excitonic ground-state transition of InGaAs quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 66, 081306 (2002)

    work page 2002

  10. [10]

    G. J. Beirne, C. Hermannst¨ adter, L. Wang, A. Rastelli, O. G. Schmidt, and P. Michler, Quantum light emission of two lateral tunnel-coupled GaAs quantum dots con- trolled by a tunable static electric field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 137401 (2006)

    work page 2006

  11. [11]

    Htoon, T

    H. Htoon, T. Takagahara, D. Kulik, O. Baklenov, A. L. Holmes, and C. K. Shih, Interplay of rabi oscillations and quantum interference in semiconductor quantum dots, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 087401 (2002)

    work page 2002

  12. [12]

    Allen and J

    L. Allen and J. H. Eberly, Optical resonance and two-level atoms (New York, Wiley, 1975)

    work page 1975

  13. [13]

    E. B. Flagg, A. Muller, J. W. Robertson, S. Founta, D. G. Deppe, M. Xiao, W. Ma, G. J. Salamo, and C. K. Shih, Resonantly driven coherent oscillations in a solid-state quantum emitter, Nat. Phys. 5, 203 (2009)

    work page 2009

  14. [14]

    T. H. Stievater, X. Li, D. G. Steel, D. Gammon, D. S. Katzer, D. Park, C. Piermarocchi, and L. J. Sham, Rabi oscillations of excitons in single quantum dots, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 133603 (2001)

    work page 2001

  15. [15]

    Zrenner, E

    A. Zrenner, E. Beham, S. Stufler, F. Findeis, M. Bich- ler, and G. Abstreiter, Coherent properties of a two-level system based on a quantum-dot photodiode, Nature 418, 612 (2002)

    work page 2002

  16. [16]

    S. T. Cundiff, A. Knorr, J. Feldmann, S. W. Koch, E. O. G¨ obel, and H. Nickel, Rabi flopping in semiconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1178 (1994)

    work page 1994

  17. [17]

    Wigger, Q

    D. Wigger, Q. Mermillod, T. Jakubczyk, F. Fras, S. Le- Denmat, D. E. Reiter, S. H¨ ofling, M. Kamp, G. Nogues, C. Schneider, T. Kuhn, and J. Kasprzak, Exploring co- herence of individual excitons in InAs quantum dots em- bedded in natural photonic defects: Influence of the ex- citation intensity, Phys. Rev. B 96, 165311 (2017)

    work page 2017

  18. [18]

    H. Wang, D. Goorskey, and M. Xiao, Enhanced kerr non- linearity via atomic coherence in a three-level atomic sys- tem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 073601 (2001)

    work page 2001

  19. [19]

    T. F. Albrecht, K. Bott, T. Meier, A. Schulze, M. Koch, S. T. Cundiff, J. Feldmann, W. Stolz, P. Thomas, S. W. Koch, and E. O. G¨ obel, Disorder mediated biexcitonic beats in semiconductor quantum wells, Phys. Rev. B 54, 4436 (1996)

    work page 1996

  20. [20]

    Ficek and S

    Z. Ficek and S. Swain, Simulating quantum interfer- ence in a three-level system with perpendicular transition dipole moments, Phys. Rev. A 69, 023401 (2004)

    work page 2004

  21. [21]

    H. Lee, P. Polynkin, M. O. Scully, and S.-Y. Zhu, Quenching of spontaneous emission via quantum inter- ference, Phys. Rev. A 55, 4454 (1997)

    work page 1997

  22. [22]

    Kocharovskaya, Amplification and lasing without in- version, Phys

    O. Kocharovskaya, Amplification and lasing without in- version, Phys. Rep. 219, 175 (1992)

    work page 1992

  23. [23]

    S. E. Harris, Lasers without inversion: Interference of lifetime-broadened resonances, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1033 (1989)

    work page 1989

  24. [24]

    M. Xiao, Y. Q. Li, S. Z. Jin, and J. Gea-Banacloche, Measurement of dispersive properties of electromagnet- ically induced transparency in rubidium atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 666 (1995)

    work page 1995

  25. [25]

    Gea-Banacloche, Y

    J. Gea-Banacloche, Y. Q. Li, S. Z. Jin, and M. Xiao, Electromagnetically induced transparency in ladder-type inhomogeneously broadened media: Theory and experi- ment, Phys. Rev. A 51, 576 (1995)

    work page 1995

  26. [26]

    Xia, C.-Y

    H.-R. Xia, C.-Y. Ye, and S.-Y. Zhu, Experimental obser- vation of spontaneous emission cancellation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1032 (1996)

    work page 1996

  27. [27]

    Y. A. Sharaby, A. Joshi, and S. S. Hassan, Coherent pop- ulation transfer in V-type atomic system, J. Nonlinear Opt. Phys. Mater. 22, 1350044 (2013)

    work page 2013

  28. [28]

    Q. Q. Wang, A. Muller, M. T. Cheng, H. J. Zhou, P. Bianucci, and C. K. Shih, Coherent control of a V- type three-level system in a single quantum dot, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 187404 (2005)

    work page 2005

  29. [29]

    K. M. Farrell, N. Yang, and M. T. Zanni, A polarization scheme that resolves cross-peaks with transient absorp- tion and eliminates diagonal peaks in 2D spectroscopy, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 119, e2117398119 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    J. Lim, H. G. Lee, S. Lee, and J. Ahn, Quantum control in two-dimensional fourier-transform spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. A 84, 013425 (2011)

    work page 2011

  31. [31]

    Wollenhaupt, A

    M. Wollenhaupt, A. Pr¨ akelt, C. Sarpe-Tudoran, D. Liese, and T. Baumert, Quantum control by selective popula- tion of dressed states using intense chirped femtosecond laser pulses, Appl. Phys. B 82, 183 (2005)

    work page 2005

  32. [32]

    J. O. Tollerud, C. R. Hall, and J. A. Davis, Isolat- ing quantum coherence using coherent multi-dimensional spectroscopy with spectrally shaped pulses, Opt. Express 22, 6719 (2014)

    work page 2014

  33. [33]

    H. J. B. Marroux and A. J. Orr-Ewing, Distinguishing population and coherence transfer pathways in a metal dicarbonyl complex using pulse-shaped two-dimensional infrared spectroscopy, J. Phys. Chem. B 120, 4125 (2016)

    work page 2016

  34. [34]

    Meshulach and Y

    D. Meshulach and Y. Silberberg, Coherent quantum con- trol of two-photon transitions by a femtosecond laser pulse, Nature 396, 239 (1998)

    work page 1998

  35. [35]

    Grisard, H

    S. Grisard, H. Rose, A. V. Trifonov, R. Reichhardt, D. E. Reiter, M. Reichelt, C. Schneider, M. Kamp, S. H¨ ofling, M. Bayer, T. Meier, and I. A. Akimov, Multiple rabi rota- tions of trions in InGaAs quantum dots observed by pho- ton echo spectroscopy with spatially shaped laser pulses, Phys. Rev. B 106, 205408 (2022)

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    P. F. Tekavec, J. A. Myers, K. L. M. Lewis, F. D. Fuller, and J. P. Ogilvie, Effects of chirp on two-dimensional fourier transform electronic spectra, Opt. Express 18, 11015 (2010)

    work page 2010

  37. [37]

    M. Binz, L. Bruder, L. Chen, M. F. Gelin, W. Domcke, and F. Stienkemeier, Effects of high pulse intensity and chirp in two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy of an atomic vapor, Opt. Express 28, 25806 (2020)

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    D. M. Jonas, Two-dimensional femtosecond spectroscopy, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 54, 425 (2003)

    work page 2003

  39. [39]

    H. Li, B. Lomsadze, G. Moody, C. Smallwood, and S. T. Cundiff, Optical multidimensional coherent spectroscopy (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2023)

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    H. Li, A. D. Bristow, M. E. Siemens, G. Moody, and S. T. Cundiff, Unraveling quantum pathways using optical 3D fourier-transform spectroscopy, Nat. Commun. 4, 1390 (2013). x

    work page 2013

  41. [41]

    Tan, Theory and phase-cycling scheme selection principles of collinear phase coherent multi-dimensional optical spectroscopy, J

    H.-S. Tan, Theory and phase-cycling scheme selection principles of collinear phase coherent multi-dimensional optical spectroscopy, J. Chem. Phys. 129, 124501 (2008)

    work page 2008

  42. [42]

    Tripathi, K

    R. Tripathi, K. K. Maurya, P. Kumar, B. De, and R. Singh, Coherent nonlinear optical response for high- intensity excitation, J. Chem. Phys. 162, 114111 (2025)

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    Nardin, G

    G. Nardin, G. Moody, R. Singh, T. M. Autry, H. Li, F. Morier-Genoud, and S. T. Cundiff, Coherent exci- tonic coupling in an asymmetric double ingaas quantum well arises from many-body effects, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 046402 (2014)

    work page 2014

  44. [44]

    T. H. Stievater, X. Li, T. Cubel, D. G. Steel, D. Gammon, D. S. Katzer, and D. Park, Measurement of relaxation between polarization eigenstates in single quantum dots, Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 4251 (2002)

    work page 2002

  45. [45]

    K. Hao, G. Moody, F. Wu, C. K. Dass, L. Xu, C.-H. Chen, L. Sun, M.-Y. Li, L.-J. Li, A. H. MacDonald, and X. Li, Direct measurement of exciton valley coherence in monolayer WSe2, Nat. Phys. 12, 677 (2016)

    work page 2016

  46. [46]

    Suzuki, R

    T. Suzuki, R. Singh, M. Bayer, A. Ludwig, A. D. Wieck, and S. T. Cundiff, Detuning dependence of rabi oscilla- tions in an InAs self-assembled quantum dot ensemble, Phys. Rev. B 97, 161301 (2018)

    work page 2018

  47. [47]

    Suzuki, R

    T. Suzuki, R. Singh, M. Bayer, A. Ludwig, A. D. Wieck, and S. T. Cundiff, Coherent control of the exciton- biexciton system in an InAs self-assembled quantum dot ensemble, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 157402 (2016)

    work page 2016

  48. [48]

    D. S. Chemla and J. Shah, Many-body and correlation effects in semiconductors, Nature 411, 549 (2001)

    work page 2001

  49. [49]

    I. D. Abella, Optical double-photon absorption in cesium vapor, Physical Review Letters 9, 453 (1962)

    work page 1962

  50. [50]

    X. Kong, E. Nir, K. Hamadani, and S. Weiss, Pho- tobleaching pathways in single-molecule FRET experi- ments, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 4643 (2007)

    work page 2007

  51. [51]

    D. Sun, Y. Rao, G. A. Reider, G. Chen, Y. You, L. Br´ ezin, A. R. Harutyunyan, and T. F. Heinz, Observa- tion of rapid exciton–exciton annihilation in monolayer molybdenum disulfide, Nano Letters 14, 5625 (2014)

    work page 2014