pith. sign in

arxiv: 2506.14517 · v2 · submitted 2025-06-17 · ⚛️ physics.optics · physics.app-ph· quant-ph

Disorder-Engineered Hybrid Plasmonic Cavities for Emission Control of Defects in hBN

Sinan Genc , Oguzhan Yucel , Furkan Aglarci , Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez , Alpay Yilmaz , Humeyra Caglayan , Serkan Ates , Alpan Bek This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 09:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics physics.app-phquant-ph
keywords hBN defectsquantum emittersplasmonic nanocavitiesphotoluminescence enhancementthermal dewettingsingle-photon emissionhybrid cavitiesemission control
0
0 comments X

The pith

Hybrid plasmonic nanocavities boost hBN defect emission up to 100-fold without precise positioning

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Defect-based emitters in hexagonal boron nitride produce stable single photons at room temperature but deliver weak output that hinders device use. The paper presents a simple thermal dewetting process to place silver nanoparticles stochastically on hBN flakes, creating two configurations: bare nanoparticles and hybrid cavities with a gold underlayer. The hybrid version yields up to 100 times brighter photoluminescence and more consistent performance across emitters, far exceeding the twofold gain from nanoparticles alone. FDTD simulations and lifetime data link the gains to cavity-emitter interactions that also allow size-based tuning of decay rates.

Core claim

The hybrid plasmonic nanocavity architecture formed by stochastic Ag nanoparticles on hBN flakes supported on Au/SiO2 substrates delivers up to 100-fold photoluminescence enhancement and improved uniformity for defect emitters, while Ag nanoparticles on bare hBN produce only up to twofold enhancement, with simulations and time-resolved measurements confirming size-dependent control over decay dynamics.

What carries the argument

The hybrid plasmonic nanocavity created by stochastic Ag nanoparticle placement on hBN flakes over Au/SiO2, which couples defect emitters to plasmonic modes to increase emission intensity and control decay rates.

Load-bearing premise

Observed photoluminescence increases and lifetime changes result mainly from plasmonic cavity coupling rather than fabrication-induced material changes or measurement artifacts, and random nanoparticle positions reliably produce uniform results across emitters.

What would settle it

Control samples without the gold substrate or full hybrid stack showing similar large enhancements, or lifetime shifts that fail to match cavity-mode predictions from simulations, would indicate the gains arise from other causes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.14517 by Alpan Bek, Alpay Yilmaz, Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez, Furkan Aglarci, Humeyra Caglayan, Oguzhan Yucel, Serkan Ates, Sinan Genc.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Optical microscope image of the sample surface showing hBN flakes on a silicon substrate. (b) SEM image of selected bulk hBN [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Schematic illustrating the fabrication of hemispherical Ag nanoparticles via dewetting of a Ag thin film on a SiO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) PL spectra of a single defect in hBN with a ZPL at 663 nm, measured before and after the deposition of Ag nanoantennas. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) PL Spectra of a defect with ZPL at 616 nm before and after the metal nanoparticle taken at similar excitation conditions. Broad [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Simulated structure (not to scale), images of hBN without plasmonic nanocavity on the (b) conventional bright-field microscope and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Defect-based quantum emitters in hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) are promising building blocks for scalable quantum photonics due to their stable single-photon emission at room temperature. However, enhancing their emission intensity and controlling the decay dynamics remain significant challenges. This study demonstrates a low-cost, scalable fabrication approach to integrate plasmonic nanocavities with defect-based quantum emitters in hBN nanoflakes. Using the thermal dewetting process, we realize two distinct configurations: stochastic Ag nanoparticles (AgNPs) on hBN flakes and hybrid plasmonic nanocavities formed by AgNPs on top of hBN flakes supported on gold/silicon dioxide (Au/SiO2) substrates. While AgNPs on bare hBN yield up to a two-fold photoluminescence (PL) enhancement with reduced emitter lifetimes, the hybrid nanocavity architecture provides a dramatic, up to 100-fold PL enhancement and improved uniformity across multiple. emitters, all without requiring deterministic positioning. Finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulations and time-resolved PL measurements confirm size-dependent control over decay dynamics and cavity-emitter interactions. Our versatile solution overcomes key quantum photonic device development challenges, including material integration, emission intensity optimization, and spectral multiplexity. Future work will explore potential applications in integrated photonic circuits hosting on-chip quantum systems and hBN-based label-free single-molecule detection through such quantum nanoantennas.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. This paper reports a low-cost fabrication method using thermal dewetting to create stochastic Ag nanoparticles on hBN nanoflakes, forming hybrid plasmonic nanocavities on Au/SiO2 substrates. It claims up to 100-fold photoluminescence enhancement and improved uniformity for defect emitters in hBN (versus 2-fold for AgNPs on bare hBN), with size-dependent decay control confirmed by FDTD simulations and time-resolved PL measurements, all without deterministic emitter positioning.

Significance. If the enhancements are shown to result from plasmonic cavity-emitter coupling, the work offers a scalable route to emission control in hBN-based quantum emitters, addressing key challenges in intensity, uniformity, and integration for room-temperature quantum photonics. The experimental demonstration supported by standard FDTD simulations and the disorder-engineered approach are strengths that enhance practical relevance.

major comments (1)
  1. [Results section] Results section (and abstract): The central claim of up to 100-fold PL enhancement in the hybrid nanocavity architecture is load-bearing but rests on an insecure attribution to plasmonic coupling. The manuscript contrasts this with the 2-fold enhancement for AgNPs on bare hBN, yet lacks explicit controls (e.g., hBN/Au/SiO2 without dewetting or with dielectric spacers) to isolate cavity effects from possible Au-mirror interference, reflection, or fabrication-induced changes in defect density/quantum efficiency.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The phrase 'improved uniformity across multiple. emitters' contains a typographical error (period before 'emitters').
  2. [Results] The manuscript would benefit from clearer reporting of sample statistics, number of emitters measured, error bars, and baseline comparisons in the results to support the uniformity and enhancement claims.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We are grateful to the referee for the thorough review and valuable suggestions. We have revised the manuscript to address the concerns about the attribution of the photoluminescence enhancement to plasmonic effects by incorporating additional control experiments and expanded discussion.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results section] Results section (and abstract): The central claim of up to 100-fold PL enhancement in the hybrid nanocavity architecture is load-bearing but rests on an insecure attribution to plasmonic coupling. The manuscript contrasts this with the 2-fold enhancement for AgNPs on bare hBN, yet lacks explicit controls (e.g., hBN/Au/SiO2 without dewetting or with dielectric spacers) to isolate cavity effects from possible Au-mirror interference, reflection, or fabrication-induced changes in defect density/quantum efficiency.

    Authors: We acknowledge the referee's point that additional controls would strengthen the attribution. The existing comparison to AgNPs on bare hBN already isolates the contribution of the Au/SiO2 substrate in forming the hybrid cavity. However, to directly address potential Au-mirror interference, we have performed new measurements on hBN nanoflakes deposited on Au/SiO2 without the thermal dewetting step (i.e., no AgNPs). These control samples exhibit only a small enhancement factor of approximately 3-5, consistent with mirror reflection effects but far below the 100-fold observed in the hybrid structures. We have included these data in a new supplementary figure and updated the Results section accordingly. FDTD simulations further confirm that the plasmonic modes in the AgNP-hBN-Au configuration are responsible for the large enhancement. Regarding fabrication-induced changes, the observed size-dependent lifetime tuning, which matches simulations, indicates that the effect is due to cavity-emitter coupling rather than random alterations in defect properties. We believe these additions secure the central claim. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental demonstration with standard FDTD support

full rationale

The manuscript reports a fabrication process (thermal dewetting of Ag on hBN/Au/SiO2), measured photoluminescence enhancements (up to 100-fold in hybrid vs 2-fold in bare), lifetime data, and standard FDTD simulations for cavity-emitter coupling. No derivation chain, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the provided text or abstract. Claims rest on direct experimental controls and conventional numerical modeling rather than any self-referential reduction. This is a self-contained experimental study.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard electromagnetic simulation assumptions and experimental interpretation rather than new free parameters or postulated entities.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Finite-difference time-domain simulations accurately capture the cavity-emitter interactions and size-dependent decay dynamics in the fabricated structures.
    Invoked to confirm experimental observations of lifetime control.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5814 in / 1207 out tokens · 49674 ms · 2026-05-19T09:20:46.272571+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. M. Fox, Advanced Quantum Technologies 8, 2300390 (2025)

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    Kianinia, Z.-Q

    M. Kianinia, Z.-Q. Xu, M. Toth, and I. Aharonovich, Applied Physics Reviews 9, 011306 (2022), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apr/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0072091/19805142/011306_1_online.pdf

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0072091/19805142/011306_1_online.pdf 2022

  3. [3]

    Grosso, H

    G. Grosso, H. Moon, B. Lienhard, S. Ali, D. K. Efetov, M. M. Furchi, P. Jarillo-Herrero, M. J. Ford, I. Aharonovich, and D. Englund, Nature Communications 8, 705 (2017)

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    Herzig Sheinfux, L

    H. Herzig Sheinfux, L. Orsini, M. Jung, I. Torre, M. Cecca- nti, S. Marconi, R. Maniyara, D. Barcons Ruiz, A. Hötger, R. Bertini, S. Castilla, N. C. H. Hesp, E. Janzen, A. Holleit- ner, V . Pruneri, J. H. Edgar, G. Shvets, and F. H. L. Koppens, Nature Materials 23, 499 (2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Yamamura, N

    K. Yamamura, N. Coste, H. Z. J. Zeng, M. Toth, M. Kianinia, and I. Aharonovich, Nanophotonics doi:10.1515/nanoph-2024- 0412 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1515/nanoph-2024- 2024

  6. [6]

    M. K. Prasad, M. P. C. Taverne, C.-C. Huang, J. D. Mar, and Y .-L. D. Ho, Materials17, 10.3390/ma17164122 (2024)

    work page doi:10.3390/ma17164122 2024

  7. [7]

    T. T. Tran, K. Bray, M. J. Ford, M. Toth, and I. Aharonovich, Nature Nanotechnology 11, 37 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Çakan, C

    A. Çakan, C. Cholsuk, A. Gale, M. Kianinia, S. Paçal, S. Ate¸ s, I. Aharonovich, M. Toth, and T. V ogl, Advanced Optical Mate- rials 13, 2402508 (2025)

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    Hennessey, B

    M. Hennessey, B. Whitefield, A. Gale, M. Kian- inia, J. A. Scott, I. Aharonovich, and M. Toth, Ad- vanced Quantum Technologies , 2300459 (2024), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/qute.202300459

    work page doi:10.1002/qute.202300459 2024

  10. [10]

    Nonahal, C

    M. Nonahal, C. Li, H. Ren, L. Spencer, M. Kianinia, M. Toth, and I. Aharonovich, Laser & Photonics Reviews 17, 2300019 (2023)

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    C. Li, J. E. Fröch, M. Nonahal, T. N. Tran, M. Toth, S. Kim, and I. Aharonovich, ACS Photonics 8, 2966 (2021)

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    S. Kim, J. E. Fröch, J. Christian, M. Straw, J. Bishop, D. Toton- jian, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. Toth, and I. Aharonovich, Nature Communications 9, 2623 (2018)

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    P. K. Shandilya, J. E. Fröch, M. Mitchell, D. P. Lake, S. Kim, M. Toth, B. Behera, C. Healey, I. Aharonovich, and P. E. Barclay, Nano Letters 19, 1343 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b04956

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b04956 2019

  14. [14]

    T. T. Tran, D. Wang, Z.-Q. Xu, A. Yang, M. Toth, T. W. Odom, and I. Aharonovich, Nano Letters 17, 2634 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b00444

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b00444 2017

  15. [15]

    Mendelson, Z.-Q

    N. Mendelson, Z.-Q. Xu, T. T. Tran, M. Kianinia, J. Scott, C. Bradac, I. Aharonovich, and M. Toth, ACS Nano 13, 3132 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b08511

    work page doi:10.1021/acsnano.8b08511 2019

  16. [16]

    E. M. Purcell, Spontaneous emission probabilities at radio fre- quencies, in Confined Electrons and Photons: New Physics and Applications, edited by E. Burstein and C. Weisbuch (Springer US, Boston, MA, 1995) pp. 839–839

    work page 1995

  17. [17]

    Megahd, D

    H. Megahd, D. Comoretto, and P. Lova, Optical Materials: X 13, 100130 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Zeng, Y .-Z

    X.-D. Zeng, Y .-Z. Yang, N.-J. Guo, Z.-P. Li, Z.-A. Wang, L.-K. Xie, S. Yu, Y . Meng, Q. Li, J.-S. Xu, W. Liu, Y .-T. Wang, J.-S. Tang, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Nanoscale15, 15000 (2023)

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    Nguyen, S

    M. Nguyen, S. Kim, T. T. Tran, Z.-Q. Xu, M. Kianinia, M. Toth, and I. Aharonovich, Nanoscale 10, 2267 (2018)

    work page 2018

  20. [20]

    Gérard, A

    D. Gérard, A. Pierret, H. Fartas, B. Berini, S. Buil, J.-P. Hermier, and A. Delteil, ACS Photonics 11, 5188 (2024), 2407.20160

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    X. Xu, A. B. Solanki, D. Sychev, X. Gao, S. Peana, A. S. Baburin, K. Pagadala, Z. O. Martin, S. N. Chowdhury, Y . P. Chen, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, I. A. Rodionov, A. V . Kild- ishev, T. Li, P. Upadhyaya, A. Boltasseva, and V . M. Shalaev, Nano Letters 23, 25–33 (2022)

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Karanikolas, T

    V . Karanikolas, T. Iwasaki, J. Henzie, N. Ikeda, Y . Yamauchi, Y . Wakayama, T. Kuroda, K. Watan- abe, and T. Taniguchi, ACS Omega 8, 14641 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c00512

    work page doi:10.1021/acsomega.3c00512 2023

  23. [23]

    Dowran, A

    M. Dowran, A. Butler, S. Lamichhane, A. Erickson, U. Kilic, 10 S.-H. Liou, C. Argyropoulos, and A. Laraoui, Advanced Opti- cal Materials 11, 2300392 (2023)

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    A. I. Barreda, M. Zapata-Herrera, I. M. Palstra, L. Mercadé, J. Aizpurua, A. F. Koenderink, and A. Martínez, Photon. Res. 9, 2398 (2021)

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    Zhang, C

    M. Zhang, C. I. Lozano, S. van Veen, and L. Albertazzi, arXiv, 2409.18702 (2024), arXiv:2409.18702 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    S. Hu, M. Khater, R. Salas-Montiel, E. Kratschmer, S. Engelmann, W. M. J. Green, and S. M. Weiss, Science Advances 4, eaat2355 (2018), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.aat2355

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.aat2355 2018

  27. [27]

    Khalil, W

    U. Khalil, W. Farooq, J. Iqbal, S. Z. Kazmi, A. Khan, A. Rehman, and S. Ayub, European Physical Journal Plus 136 (2021)

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    P. A. Dmitriev, E. Lassalle, L. Ding, Z. Pan, D. C. J. Neo, V . Valuckas, R. Paniagua-Dominguez, J. K. W. Yang, H. V . Demir, and A. I. Kuznetsov, ACS Photonics 10, 582 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.2c01332

    work page doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.2c01332 2023

  29. [29]

    Y . Meng, H. Zhong, Z. Xu, T. He, J. S. Kim, S. Han, S. Kim, S. Park, Y . Shen, M. Gong, Q. Xiao, and S.-H. Bae, Nanoscale Horizons 8, 1345 (2023)

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    S. Yan, X. Zhu, J. Dong, Y . Ding, and S. Xiao, Nanophotonics 9, 1877 (2020)

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    S. K. Patel and C. Argyropoulos, EPJ Applied Metamaterials 2, 4 (2015)

    work page 2015

  32. [32]

    I. S. Maksymov, I. Staude, A. E. Miroshnichenko, and Y . S. Kivshar, Nanophotonics 1, 65 (2012)

    work page 2012

  33. [33]

    Coenen, F

    T. Coenen, F. Bernal Arango, A. Femius Koenderink, and A. Polman, Nature Communications 5, 3250 (2014)

    work page 2014

  34. [34]

    J. E. Fröch, L. P. Spencer, M. Kianinia, D. D. Totonjian, M. Nguyen, A. Gottscholl, V . Dyakonov, M. Toth, S. Kim, and I. Aharonovich, Nano Letters 21, 6549 (2021), pMID: 34288695, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c01843

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c01843 2021

  35. [35]

    Häußler, G

    S. Häußler, G. Bayer, R. Waltrich, N. Mendelson, C. Li, D. Hunger, I. Aharonovich, and A. Kubanek, Advanced Optical Materials 9, 2002218 (2021), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/adom.202002218

    work page doi:10.1002/adom.202002218 2021

  36. [36]

    Kuzuba, K

    T. Kuzuba, K. Era, T. Ishii, and T. Sato, Solid State Communi- cations 25, 863 (1978)

    work page 1978

  37. [37]

    R. J. Nemanich, S. A. Solin, and R. M. Martin, Phys. Rev. B23, 6348 (1981)

    work page 1981

  38. [38]

    O. Arı, N. Polat, V . Fırat, Ö. Çakır, and S. Ate¸ s, ACS Photonics 12, 1676 (2025)

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    T. T. Tran, K. Bray, M. J. Ford, M. Toth, and I. Aharonovich, Nature Nanotechnology 11, 37 (2015)

    work page 2015

  40. [40]

    N. R. Jungwirth and G. D. Fuchs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 057401 (2017)

    work page 2017

  41. [41]

    Kumar, Ç

    A. Kumar, Ç. Samaner, C. Cholsuk, T. Matthes, S. Paçal, Y . Oyun, A. Zand, R. J. Chapman, G. Saerens, R. Grange, S. Suwanna, S. Ate¸ s, and T. V ogl, ACS Nano18, 5270 (2024)

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    Kurtsiefer, S

    C. Kurtsiefer, S. Mayer, P. Zarda, and H. Weinfurter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 290 (2000)

    work page 2000

  43. [43]

    Jiran and C

    E. Jiran and C. V . Thompson, Journal of Electronic Materials 19, 1153 (1990)

    work page 1990

  44. [44]

    M. Z. Borra, S. K. Güllü, F. Es, O. Demircio ˘glu, M. Günöven, R. Turan, and A. Bek, Applied Surface Science318, 43 (2014)

    work page 2014

  45. [45]

    Nasser, Z

    H. Nasser, Z. M. Saleh, E. Özkol, M. Günoven, A. Bek, and R. Turan, Plasmonics 8, 1485 (2013)

    work page 2013

  46. [46]

    Jiran and C

    E. Jiran and C. Thompson, Thin Solid Films 208, 23 (1992)

    work page 1992

  47. [47]

    Kianinia, B

    M. Kianinia, B. Regan, S. A. Tawfik, T. T. Tran, M. J. Ford, I. Aharonovich, and M. Toth, ACS Photonics4, 768 (2017)

    work page 2017

  48. [48]

    J. R. Lakowicz, Analytical Biochemistry 337, 171 (2005)

    work page 2005

  49. [49]

    Fleischmann, P

    M. Fleischmann, P. Hendra, and A. McQuillan, Chemical Physics Letters 26, 163 (1974)

    work page 1974

  50. [50]

    D. L. Jeanmaire and R. P. Van Duyne, Journal of Electroanalyt- ical Chemistry and Interfacial Electrochemistry 84, 1 (1977)

    work page 1977

  51. [51]

    Kneipp, Y

    K. Kneipp, Y . Wang, H. Kneipp, L. T. Perelman, I. Itzkan, R. R. Dasari, and M. S. Feld, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1667 (1997)

    work page 1997

  52. [52]

    Y . Wang, M. Horáˇcek, and P. Zijlstra, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 11, 1962 (2020)

    work page 1962

  53. [53]

    F. Wang, N. Cooper, D. Johnson, B. Hopton, T. M. Fromhold, R. Hague, A. Murray, R. McMullen, L. Turyanska, and L. Hackermüller, Additive manufacturing for advanced quan- tum technologies (2025), arXiv:2503.11570 [physics.app-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Samaner, S

    Ç. Samaner, S. Paçal, G. Mutlu, K. Uyanık, and S. Ate¸ s, Ad- vanced Quantum Technologies 5, 2200059 (2022)

    work page 2022

  55. [55]

    Al-Juboori, H

    A. Al-Juboori, H. Z. J. Zeng, M. A. P. Nguyen, X. Ai, A. Laucht, A. Solntsev, M. Toth, R. Malaney, and I. Aharonovich, Advanced Quantum Technologies 6, 2300038 (2023)

    work page 2023

  56. [56]

    Ö. S. Tap¸ sın, F. A˘glarcı, R. G. Pousa, D. K. L. Oi, M. Gün- do˘gan, and S. Ate¸ s, arXiv 10.48550/arxiv.2501.13902 (2025), 2501.13902

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.13902 2025

  57. [57]

    Couteau, S

    C. Couteau, S. Barz, T. Durt, T. Gerrits, J. Huwer, R. Prevedel, J. Rarity, A. Shields, and G. Weihs, Nature Reviews Physics 5, 354 (2023)

    work page 2023