Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 7 minor 54 references

Break Stylistic Sophon: Are We Really Meant to Confine the Imagination in Style Transfer?

T0 review · 4 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read StyleWallfacer claims that one reference painting, converted into a BLIP caption stripped of style words by an LLM and injected through a triple diffusion process, is enough to teach a diffusion model artist-level style transfer…

desk verdict A coherent but incomplete style-transfer pipeline; the central semantic-gap claim is entirely unsupported by the empty appendix and missing ablations, so not reviewable as submitted. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.15033 v1 pith:4GZWUKQ2 submitted 2025-06-18 cs.CV

Gary Song Yan , Yusen Zhang , Jinyu Zhao , Hao Zhang , Zhangping Yang , Guanye Xiong , Yanfei Liu , Tao Zhang
show 4 more authors
Yujie He Siyuan Tian Yao Gou Min Li
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords styletransferdiffusionmodelsone-shotlearningtext-to-imagegenerationsemanticgapLoRAfine-tuninghumanfeedbackcolorediting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes StyleWallfacer, a single training-and-inference framework that claims to cover one-shot text-driven style transfer, text-driven stylization, image-driven style transfer, and color editing during transfer. The training side learns style from one reference painting by captioning the painting with BLIP in CLIP space, asking an LLM to delete style-related words, and fine-tuning a LoRA on the image paired with the remaining content caption. The inference side is a training-free triple diffusion process: a main denoising stream preserves content, a more-noised stream supplies style keys and values, and a DDIM-inverted stream supplies structural queries. The paper reports that this removes semantic drift and overfitting while keeping text control, and that quantitative metrics over baselines favor StyleWallfacer on all three tasks studied. If the paper is right, several separate style-transfer tools collapse into one pipeline driven by a single reference image.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are the semantic gap and the triple diffusion process. The semantic gap is defined by Eq. (1) and (2): $T_{\text{CLIP}} = \text{BLIP}(I)$ and then $T_{\text{w/o S}} = \text{LLM}(T_{\text{CLIP}})$, so the gap is the difference between an image's full CLIP-space caption and the caption with style words deleted. That gap is what the LoRA fine-tuning is asked to learn, and it is the component that supposedly prevents semantic drift. The triple diffusion process then carries the style into new images without retraining: the main denoising stream runs at a small noise threshold $t_s^s$ to preserve content; a parallel stream runs at a larger threshold $t_l^s$ and donates its self-attention keys $K_t^l$ and values $V_t^l$; a third stream denoises the DDIM-inverted latent and donates its queries $Q_t^i$, blended as $Q_t^f = \beta Q_t^i + (1-\beta) Q_t^s$. The replacement $\phi^l_{\text{out}} = \text{Attn}(Q_t^f, K_t^l, V_t^l)$ is the mechanism that injects style while query preservation holds the original content in place.

What would settle it

Compare the BLIP caption of a style image with the LLM-rewritten caption: if the rewritten caption still names the artist's brushwork, palette, or genre, or if the deleted words name objects, the semantic gap is contaminated. A quick ablation fixes the style LoRA but trains it with the original caption, the rewritten caption, and a caption with style words forcibly removed; if CLIP-FID, CLIP-I, and LPIPS do not move, the semantic gap is not doing the work the paper assigns to it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that an artist's style can be separated from a single painting by operating entirely inside the text space of a text-to-image model. StyleWallfacer first uses BLIP to transcribe the reference image into a caption that CLIP would associate with it, then uses an LLM to strike out every style-bearing phrase, leaving a content-only caption. Fine-tuning a LoRA on the pair of reference image plus content-only caption is supposed to force the model to encode everything the caption does not say, namely brushwork, palette habits, and composition logic, as style knowledge without shifting its semantics. At inference, the paper's triple diffusion process runs three denoising streams that share weights: a small-noise main stream keeps the original image's structure, a large-noise stream contributes its self-attention keys and values as style, and an inverted-noise stream contributes its queries to preserve content. The paper states that this achieves artist-level image-driven and text-driven results, keeps the text prompt in control, permits color editing during transfer for the first time, and outperforms the compared state-of-the-art methods on the reported CLIP-FID, DINO, CLIP-I, CLIP-T, and LPIPS metrics.

Load-bearing premise

The whole method depends on the assumption that when a large language model removes style-related words from an automated caption of the style image, the removed words are exactly the style and whatever remains is pure content; this division is never verified, so if the rewriting is imperfect the claimed drift-free style injection has no measured basis.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • One reference painting could replace the separate tools currently used for one-shot text-driven style transfer, text-driven stylization, image-driven style transfer, and color editing.
  • Because the style LoRA is learned from a caption gap rather than an identifier token, the fine-tuned model should obey complex prompts instead of drifting toward the reference image's content.
  • Color editing during style transfer becomes possible: the same pipeline can output the transferred image in gold, purple, pink, or silver palettes while keeping the structure of the source image.
  • The human-feedback data augmentation means training can start from one image and grow to 50, then 100 selected samples, reducing overfitting without collecting a new dataset.
  • If the reported metrics hold, StyleWallfacer would set a new quantitative baseline for CLIP-FID, DINO, CLIP-I, CLIP-T, and LPIPS on all three one-shot style tasks tested.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the semantic gap really is learnable from a single image, the same caption-minus-style recipe could transfer to non-visual domains such as audio timbre or 3D object style, wherever a captioner and a style-stripping language model exist.
  • The query-preservation coefficient $\beta$ behaves like a continuous content-style dial; a natural next experiment is to measure whether interpolating $\beta$ traces a smooth perceptual path from the original photo to the fully stylized output.
  • The human selection step could be automated by scoring generated samples against the reference image's style with CLIP and keeping the highest scorers, turning the three-stage augmentation into a closed loop.
  • The color-editing results suggest that text color tokens act through the cross-attention layers rather than the swapped self-attention keys and values; one could test this by ablating color words from the prompt while keeping the style stream unchanged.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper proposes StyleWallfacer, a unified training-and-inference framework for one-shot text-driven and image-driven style transfer and text-driven stylization. The method has three components: (i) a semantic-gap style injection that uses BLIP to caption the style image and an LLM to strip style-related words from the caption before LoRA fine-tuning; (ii) a human-feedback progressive data augmentation scheme that expands a one-shot training set to 50 and then 100 model-generated, human-selected samples; and (iii) a training-free triple diffusion process that injects style by replacing key/value features in self-attention layers of a main denoising process with those of a style-guided process, while using query fusion with a DDIM-inverted latent to preserve content. The authors claim artist-level style transfer, content preservation, text controllability, and, for the first time, color editing during style transfer, with experimental results that outperform state-of-the-art methods on all evaluated tasks.

Significance. If fully supported, the framework would be a genuinely useful unification: a single method that performs text-driven style transfer, image-driven style transfer, text-driven stylization, and color editing with one fine-tuned LoRA. The core equations (3) and (4) are simple and plausible, and the idea of using an LLM to create a semantic gap between image captions and content-only captions is interesting and worth investigating. The paper also aims to address real known weaknesses of one-shot style transfer, namely semantic drift, overfitting, and limited color gamut. However, the manuscript as submitted does not provide the support needed to verify these claims: the appendices are empty headings, implementation details are absent, ablations are deferred to non-existent sections, the LLM rewriting step is never shown or measured, and the quantitative results include no error bars and are partially contradicted by the paper's own tables. The central claims are therefore currently unsubstantiated, despite the plausibility of the overall approach.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.4, Appendix B–H] The paper explicitly defers the ablation study to 'Appendix ??' and the appendix contains only section headings with no content. Sections B.1–B.4 (implementation details), C (mathematical explanation), D (visualizations), E (additional analysis), F (additional results), G (limitations), and H (broader impact) are all empty. This is not a presentation issue: the central claims of drift-free style injection, reduced overfitting, and artist-level style transfer are supported only by the qualitative figures and the three quantitative tables, with no ablation isolating the proposed components. A revision must supply these sections, including ablations that vary the LLM rewriting, the noise thresholds t_l_s and t_s_s, the query-fusion weight β, and the human-selected augmentation sizes, as well as the missing mathematical explanation.
  2. [§2.2, Eqs. (1)–(2)] The semantic-gap assumption is load-bearing and is never tested. The paper assumes that BLIP's caption T_CLIP contains all style information, that the LLM edit removes exactly the style-related words, and that the residual caption T_withoutS is content-only, so that fine-tuning on image–caption pairs teaches style without semantic drift. No example of T_CLIP or T_withoutS is provided, no LLM prompt is given, no quantification of removed style vocabulary is reported, and no ablation varies the rewriting. Without such evidence, the claimed 'drift-free' style injection is an unverified premise. Please include concrete caption pairs for each style image plus a rewriting ablation with and without the LLM step.
  3. [§3.3, Tables 2–3] The statement in §3.3 that 'the method proposed in this paper achieved the best results compared with all baseline methods' is contradicted by Table 3. On the LPIPS metric, which the paper reports with a downward arrow as content-preservation quality, InstantStyle-Plus achieves 0.3909, 0.2903, and 0.3132 for the three transfer settings, while Ours achieves 0.5917, 0.7437, and 0.6848. Thus InstantStyle-Plus preserves content substantially better according to the paper's own metric. The authors need to either revise the blanket claim, explain why the trade-off is favorable despite the worse LPIPS, or provide a composite evaluation criterion. In addition, no error bars, confidence intervals, or statistical significance tests are reported for any table, and each condition uses only one reference style image, so the superiority claim is not established.
  4. [§3.1, Appendix B] The method is not reproducible from the submitted text. The paper does not specify the base text-to-image model (e.g., Stable Diffusion 1.5, 2.x, or SDXL), LoRA rank and learning rate, number of training steps, the exact noise threshold values t_l_s and t_s_s, the DDIM inversion settings, the query-fusion weight β, or the human-selection protocol for the 50 and 100 augmented samples. The free parameters β, t_l_s, t_s_s, and the augmentation sizes are introduced without any sensitivity analysis. A revision must provide a complete implementation section, including all hyperparameters and the prompts used for generation and selection.
minor comments (7)
  1. [§3.1] There is a typo in the generated test data description: 'a photo of a moutain' should be 'a photo of a mountain'.
  2. [§3.1, refs [34] and [54]] LPIPS is cited to reference [34], which is the aliased-resizing paper, rather than to [54], which is the actual LPIPS paper. Please correct the citation.
  3. [§3.1, ref [52]] The DINO score is cited to [52], which is the DETR object-detection paper, not the DINOv2 self-supervised representation learning paper typically used for perceptual similarity. Please cite the correct feature source.
  4. [§3.3, Tables 1–3] The metric naming is confusing: Table 1 reports 'I-LPIPS' with an upward arrow as a diversity metric, while Tables 2 and 3 report 'LPIPS' with a downward arrow as a content-preservation metric. These are different quantities, and the relation between them should be stated explicitly to avoid the appearance of an inconsistency.
  5. [§2.3, Eqs. (3)–(4)] The text says that μ(·), σ(·), and φ_l_out denote channel-wise mean, standard deviation, and the attention output, but μ and σ do not appear in the displayed equations. This looks like leftover text from an earlier formulation and should be cleaned up.
  6. [Figure 2] Several symbols and labels in Figure 2 are garbled, including the placeholder 'denoted as )' and the threshold notation t_l_s / t_s_s. Please regenerate the figure with clear, full notation.
  7. [§4 and Appendix G–H] The conclusion refers to Appendix G and H for limitations and broader impact, but those sections are empty. Limitations and broader-impact statements should be present in the main text or in a completed appendix.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the style-transfer pipeline is an empirical training and inference recipe, not a derivation whose predictions reduce to its inputs.

full rationale

Walking the claimed derivation chain, StyleWallfacer consists of (1) BLIP captioning of the style image in Eq. (1), (2) LLM-based removal of style-related words in Eq. (2), (3) LoRA fine-tuning on the resulting image-caption pairs, and (4) a training-free triple diffusion process that replaces self-attention K/V features and fuses query features via Eqs. (3)-(4). None of these steps defines the target output, the style-transferred images, in terms of the fitted quantities by construction: the fine-tuning uses the style reference and a stripped caption, but the reported evaluation images are generated from external FLUX content images, so the output is not forced to equal the training input. The semantic-gap assumption that the LLM removes exactly the style-related words is unverified and arguably the weakest load-bearing premise, but an unmeasured assumption is not circularity under the required standard. Similarly, the human-feedback data augmentation adds the model's own early outputs to its training set after human selection; this is a training-data bias and can compromise independence of the evidence, but it does not make the final style-transfer result equivalent to the selected samples by construction. The missing ablation studies and empty appendices weaken support for the claims, but they are evidence-quality problems rather than circular-derivation problems. Because no specific equation or fitted parameter can be exhibited as being renamed as a prediction, the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical or conceptual entities are introduced beyond the framework and the semantic-gap construct, which is operational rather than a separately falsifiable entity. The central claim depends on hand-set inference thresholds, the BLIP/LLM captioning assumption, the attention replacement assumption, and the human-selection assumption.

free parameters (4)
  • beta query fusion weight = not reported (beta in [0,1])
    Eq. (3) fuses the DDIM-inversion query with the main-process query; the balance between content preservation and style injection is hand-set and no value or sweep is reported.
  • large noise threshold t_l_s = not reported (examples in Figure 3)
    Controls how stylized the guiding diffusion process is; the paper says higher values strengthen style but gives no concrete schedule or per-experiment values.
  • small noise threshold t_s_s = not reported
    Controls content preservation in the main diffusion process; the paper says lower values keep more content but gives no concrete values.
  • human-selected augmentation sizes 50 and 100 = 50 then 100
    Stage 1 expands one image to 50 selected generations and stage 2 to 100; these counts are arbitrary choices that affect overfitting and style fidelity.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption BLIP captions reconstruct image semantics in CLIP space accurately enough for fine-tuning
    Eq. (1) treats the BLIP caption as the image's semantic description in CLIP space; the paper does not evaluate caption quality or CLIP alignment.
  • domain assumption An LLM can reliably remove all style-related content from a caption while preserving content
    Eq. (2) creates the semantic gap; no examples, prompts, or validation of the LLM's partition are given, and Appendix B.4 (LLM details) is empty.
  • domain assumption Replacing self-attention key and value from a higher-noise denoising branch transfers style while query preservation protects content
    Eqs. (3)-(4) implement this; the paper gives qualitative motivation from Figure 3, but the mathematical explanation in Appendix C is empty.
  • domain assumption Human-selected generated samples are valid training data and improve generalization
    Section 2.4 assumes the model's own early generations that resemble the style image are good targets; no objective selection criterion or independent verification is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Break Stylistic Sophon: Are We Really Meant to Confine the Imagination in Style Transfer?." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4GZWUKQ2

@misc{pith2026250615033,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Break Stylistic Sophon: Are We Really Meant to Confine the Imagination in Style Transfer?},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4GZWUKQ2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.15033}
}
read the original abstract

In this pioneering study, we introduce StyleWallfacer, a groundbreaking unified training and inference framework, which not only addresses various issues encountered in the style transfer process of traditional methods but also unifies the framework for different tasks. This framework is designed to revolutionize the field by enabling artist level style transfer and text driven stylization. First, we propose a semantic-based style injection method that uses BLIP to generate text descriptions strictly aligned with the semantics of the style image in CLIP space. By leveraging a large language model to remove style-related descriptions from these descriptions, we create a semantic gap. This gap is then used to fine-tune the model, enabling efficient and drift-free injection of style knowledge. Second, we propose a data augmentation strategy based on human feedback, incorporating high-quality samples generated early in the fine-tuning process into the training set to facilitate progressive learning and significantly reduce its overfitting. Finally, we design a training-free triple diffusion process using the fine-tuned model, which manipulates the features of self-attention layers in a manner similar to the cross-attention mechanism. Specifically, in the generation process, the key and value of the content-related process are replaced with those of the style-related process to inject style while maintaining text control over the model. We also introduce query preservation to mitigate disruptions to the original content. Under such a design, we have achieved high-quality image-driven style transfer and text-driven stylization, delivering artist-level style transfer results while preserving the original image content. Moreover, we achieve image color editing during the style transfer process for the first time.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.15033 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. We found that existing image style transfer methods based on a single style image (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Illustration of the StyleWallfacer Framework. In the fine-tuning stage (a), we use a semantic-based style knowledge injection method with human feedback (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Illustration of the Impact of Noise Schedule Threshold ts on Model Generation Results. However, as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Illustration of the Best Generation Results When Fine-tuning the Model Directly with a Single Image. Specifically, when the model is first trained on a single style image, as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Illustration of the Small Scale Datasets Augmentation Method Based on Human Feedback. To this end, as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Qualitative Comparison of Text-driven Style Transfer Results on Van Gogh houses Dataset Using Different Methods. Due to page limitations, we have placed some of the experimental results in Appendix F.1. House Prompt: a [v] dog Prompt: a [v] cat Prompt: a [v] house Drea…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Qualitative Comparison of Text-driven Stylization Results Using Different Methods. Due to page limitations, we have placed some of the experimental results in Appendix F.2. Datasets We selected one image from each of the three widely used 10-shot datasets, including la…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Qualitative Comparison of Image-driven Style Transfer and Color Edit Results on Van Gogh houses Dataset Using Different Methods. Due to page limitations, we have placed some of the experimental results in Appendix F.3 and F.4 and some comparison results with GPT-4o [33…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Llama-3.2-1b, 2024

    Meta AI. Llama-3.2-1b, 2024. Accessed: 2025-03-06

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Lectures in Mathematics

    Luigi Ambrosio, Nicola Gigli, and Giuseppe Savaré.Gradient Flows: In Metric Spaces and in the Space of Probability Measures. Lectures in Mathematics. ETH Zürich. Birkhäuser Basel, 2 edition, 2008

    work page 2008

  3. [3]

    Tim Brooks, Aleksander Holynski, and Alexei A. Efros. Instructpix2pix: Learning to follow im- age editing instructions. InIEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2023, V ancouver , BC, Canada, June 17-24, 2023, pages 18392–18402. IEEE, 2023

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    elatcsf: A temporal contrast sensitivity function for flicker detection and modeling variable refresh rate flicker

    Yancheng Cai, Ali Bozorgian, Maliha Ashraf, Robert Wanat, and K Rafał Mantiuk. elatcsf: A temporal contrast sensitivity function for flicker detection and modeling variable refresh rate flicker. InSIGGRAPH Asia 2024 Conference Papers, pages 1–11, 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Do computer vision founda- tion models learn the low-level characteristics of the human visual system?arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.20256, 2025

    Yancheng Cai, Fei Yin, Dounia Hammou, and Rafal Mantiuk. Do computer vision founda- tion models learn the low-level characteristics of the human visual system?arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.20256, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    Yancheng Cai, Bo Zhang, Baopu Li, Tao Chen, Hongliang Yan, Jingdong Zhang, and Jiahao Xu. Rethinking cross-domain pedestrian detection: A background-focused distribution alignment framework for instance-free one-stage detectors.IEEE transactions on image processing, 32:4935–4950, 2023

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Artadapter: Text-to-image style transfer using multi-level style encoder and explicit adaptation

    Dar-Yen Chen, Hamish Tennent, and Ching-Wen Hsu. Artadapter: Text-to-image style transfer using multi-level style encoder and explicit adaptation. InIEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2024, Seattle, WA, USA, June 16-22, 2024, pages 8619–8628. IEEE, 2024

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Controlstyle: Text-driven stylized image generation using diffusion priors

    Jingwen Chen, Yingwei Pan, Ting Yao, and Tao Mei. Controlstyle: Text-driven stylized image generation using diffusion priors. In Abdulmotaleb El-Saddik, Tao Mei, Rita Cucchiara, Marco Bertini, Diana Patricia Tobon Vallejo, Pradeep K. Atrey, and M. Shamim Hossain, editors, Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia, MM 2023, Ottawa,...

    work page 2023

Show all 54 references
  1. [9]

    Style injection in diffusion: A training-free approach for adapting large-scale diffusion models for style transfer

    Jiwoo Chung, Sangeek Hyun, and Jae-Pil Heo. Style injection in diffusion: A training-free approach for adapting large-scale diffusion models for style transfer. InIEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2024, Seattle, WA, USA, June 16-22, 2024, pag...

    2024

  2. [10]

    An image is worth one word: Personalizing text-to-image generation using textual inversion

    Rinon Gal, Yuval Alaluf, Yuval Atzmon, Or Patashnik, Amit Haim Bermano, Gal Chechik, and Daniel Cohen-Or. An image is worth one word: Personalizing text-to-image generation using textual inversion. InThe Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2023,...

    2023

  3. [11]

    Bermano, Gal Chechik, and Daniel Cohen-Or

    Rinon Gal, Or Patashnik, Haggai Maron, Amit H. Bermano, Gal Chechik, and Daniel Cohen-Or. Stylegan-nada: Clip-guided domain adaptation of image generators.ACM Trans. Graph., 41(4):141:1–141:13, 2022

    2022

  4. [12]

    Styleshot: A snapshot on any style.CoRR, abs/2407.01414, 2024

    Junyao Gao, Yanchen Liu, Yanan Sun, Yinhao Tang, Yanhong Zeng, Kai Chen, and Cairong Zhao. Styleshot: A snapshot on any style.CoRR, abs/2407.01414, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Metaxas, and Feng Yang

    Ligong Han, Yinxiao Li, Han Zhang, Peyman Milanfar, Dimitris N. Metaxas, and Feng Yang. Svdiff: Compact parameter space for diffusion fine-tuning. InIEEE/CVF International Con- ference on Computer Vision, ICCV 2023, Paris, France, October 1-6, 2023, pages 7289–7300. IEEE, 2023

    2023

  6. [14]

    Delta denoising score

    Amir Hertz, Kfir Aberman, and Daniel Cohen-Or. Delta denoising score. InIEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, ICCV 2023, Paris, France, October 1-6, 2023, pages 2328–2337. IEEE, 2023. 11

    2023

  7. [15]

    Style aligned image generation via shared attention

    Amir Hertz, Andrey V oynov, Shlomi Fruchter, and Daniel Cohen-Or. Style aligned image generation via shared attention. InIEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2024, Seattle, WA, USA, June 16-22, 2024, pages 4775–4785. IEEE, 2024

    2024

  8. [16]

    Aespa-net: Aesthetic pattern-aware style transfer networks

    Kibeom Hong, Seogkyu Jeon, Junsoo Lee, Namhyuk Ahn, Kunhee Kim, Pilhyeon Lee, Daesik Kim, Youngjung Uh, and Hyeran Byun. Aespa-net: Aesthetic pattern-aware style transfer networks. InIEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, ICCV 2023, Paris, France, October 1-6, 2...

    2023

  9. [17]

    Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, and Weizhu Chen

    Edward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, and Weizhu Chen. Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. InThe Tenth International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2022, Virtual Event, April 25-29, 2022. Ope...

    2022

  10. [18]

    Diffstyler: Controllable dual diffusion for text-driven image stylization.IEEE Trans

    Nisha Huang, Yuxin Zhang, Fan Tang, Chongyang Ma, Haibin Huang, Weiming Dong, and Changsheng Xu. Diffstyler: Controllable dual diffusion for text-driven image stylization.IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst., 36(2):3370–3383, 2025

    2025

  11. [19]

    Belongie

    Xun Huang and Serge J. Belongie. Arbitrary style transfer in real-time with adaptive instance normalization. InIEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, ICCV 2017, V enice, Italy, October 22-29, 2017, pages 1510–1519. IEEE Computer Society, 2017

    2017

  12. [20]

    Artist: Aesthetically controllable text-driven stylization without training, 2024

    Ruixiang Jiang and Changwen Chen. Artist: Aesthetically controllable text-driven stylization without training, 2024

    2024

  13. [21]

    Avatarcraft: Transforming text into neural human avatars with parameterized shape and pose control

    Ruixiang Jiang, Can Wang, Jingbo Zhang, Menglei Chai, Mingming He, Dongdong Chen, and Jing Liao. Avatarcraft: Transforming text into neural human avatars with parameterized shape and pose control. InIEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, ICCV 2023, Paris, France...

    2023

  14. [22]

    Imagic: Text-based real image editing with diffusion models

    Bahjat Kawar, Shiran Zada, Oran Lang, Omer Tov, Huiwen Chang, Tali Dekel, Inbar Mosseri, and Michal Irani. Imagic: Text-based real image editing with diffusion models. InIEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2023, V ancouver , BC, Canada, June 17...

    2023

  15. [23]

    Diffusionclip: Text-guided diffusion models for robust image manipulation

    Gwanghyun Kim, Taesung Kwon, and Jong Chul Ye. Diffusionclip: Text-guided diffusion models for robust image manipulation. InIEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2022, New Orleans, LA, USA, June 18-24, 2022, pages 2416–2425. IEEE, 2022

    2022

  16. [24]

    Clipstyler: Image style transfer with a single text condition

    Gihyun Kwon and Jong Chul Ye. Clipstyler: Image style transfer with a single text condition. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2022, New Orleans, LA, USA, June 18-24, 2022, pages 18041–18050. IEEE, 2022

    2022

  17. [25]

    Flux.https://github.com/black-forest-labs/flux, 2024

    Black Forest Labs. Flux.https://github.com/black-forest-labs/flux, 2024

    2024

  18. [26]

    Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Caiming Xiong, and Steven C. H. Hoi. BLIP: bootstrapping language- image pre-training for unified vision-language understanding and generation. In Kamalika Chaudhuri, Stefanie Jegelka, Le Song, Csaba Szepesvári, Gang Niu, and Sivan Sabato, editors, Intern...

    2022

  19. [27]

    Tor Books, 2014

    Cixin Liu.The Three-Body Problem. Tor Books, 2014

    2014

  20. [28]

    Adaattn: Revisit attention mechanism in arbitrary neural style transfer

    Songhua Liu, Tianwei Lin, Dongliang He, Fu Li, Meiling Wang, Xin Li, Zhengxing Sun, Qian Li, and Errui Ding. Adaattn: Revisit attention mechanism in arbitrary neural style transfer. In 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, ICCV 2021, Montreal, QC, Canada, ...

    2021

  21. [29]

    Freestyler: A free-form stylization method via multimodal vector quantization

    Wu-Qin Liu, Minxuan Lin, Haibin Huang, Chongyang Ma, and Weiming Dong. Freestyler: A free-form stylization method via multimodal vector quantization. In Fang-Lue Zhang and Andrei Sharf, editors,Computational Visual Media - 12th International Conference, CVM 2024, Wellington, N...

    2024

  22. [30]

    Text2mesh: Text- driven neural stylization for meshes

    Oscar Michel, Roi Bar-On, Richard Liu, Sagie Benaim, and Rana Hanocka. Text2mesh: Text- driven neural stylization for meshes. InIEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2022, New Orleans, LA, USA, June 18-24, 2022, pages 13482–13492. IEEE, 2022

    2022

  23. [31]

    Efros, Yong Jae Lee, Eli Shechtman, and Richard Zhang

    Utkarsh Ojha, Yijun Li, Jingwan Lu, Alexei A. Efros, Yong Jae Lee, Eli Shechtman, and Richard Zhang. Few-shot image generation via cross-domain correspondence. In2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Jun 2021

    2021

  24. [32]

    Efros, Yong Jae Lee, Eli Shechtman, and Richard Zhang

    Utkarsh Ojha, Yijun Li, Jingwan Lu, Alexei A. Efros, Yong Jae Lee, Eli Shechtman, and Richard Zhang. Few-shot image generation via cross-domain correspondence. InIEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2021, virtual, June 19-25, 2021, pages 10743–10752...

    2021

  25. [33]

    OpenAI. Gpt-4o. https://openai.com/chatgpt/overview/, 2024. Accessed: 2024-10- 05

    2024

  26. [34]

    On aliased resizing and surprising subtleties in GAN evaluation

    Gaurav Parmar, Richard Zhang, and Jun-Yan Zhu. On aliased resizing and surprising subtleties in GAN evaluation. InIEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2022, New Orleans, LA, USA, June 18-24, 2022, pages 11400–11410. IEEE, 2022

    2022

  27. [35]

    SDXL: improving latent diffusion models for high-resolution image synthesis

    Dustin Podell, Zion English, Kyle Lacey, Andreas Blattmann, Tim Dockhorn, Jonas Müller, Joe Penna, and Robin Rombach. SDXL: improving latent diffusion models for high-resolution image synthesis. InThe Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2024, Vie...

    2024

  28. [36]

    Barron, and Ben Mildenhall

    Ben Poole, Ajay Jain, Jonathan T. Barron, and Ben Mildenhall. Dreamfusion: Text-to-3d using 2d diffusion. InThe Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2023, Kigali, Rwanda, May 1-5, 2023. OpenReview.net, 2023

    2023

  29. [37]

    Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision

    Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agar- wal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, Gretchen Krueger, and Ilya Sutskever. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In Marina Meila an...

    2021

  30. [38]

    RB-modulation: Training-free stylization using reference-based modulation

    Litu Rout, Yujia Chen, Nataniel Ruiz, Abhishek Kumar, Constantine Caramanis, Sanjay Shakkot- tai, and Wen-Sheng Chu. RB-modulation: Training-free stylization using reference-based modulation. InThe Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2025

    2025

  31. [39]

    Dreambooth: Fine tuning text-to-image diffusion models for subject-driven generation

    Nataniel Ruiz, Yuanzhen Li, Varun Jampani, Yael Pritch, Michael Rubinstein, and Kfir Aberman. Dreambooth: Fine tuning text-to-image diffusion models for subject-driven generation. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2023, V ancouver , BC, Ca...

    2023

  32. [40]

    Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and Their Applications

    Filippo Santambrogio.Optimal Transport for Applied Mathematicians: Calculus of V ariations, PDEs, and Modeling. Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and Their Applications. Birkhäuser Cham, 1 edition, 2015

    2015

  33. [41]

    Exploring data scaling trends and effects in reinforcement learning from human feedback, 2025

    Wei Shen, Guanlin Liu, Zheng Wu, Ruofei Zhu, Qingping Yang, Chao Xin, Yu Yue, and Lin Yan. Exploring data scaling trends and effects in reinforcement learning from human feedback, 2025

    2025

  34. [42]

    Styledrop: Text-to-image synthesis of any style

    Kihyuk Sohn, Lu Jiang, Jarred Barber, Kimin Lee, Nataniel Ruiz, Dilip Krishnan, Huiwen Chang, Yuanzhen Li, Irfan Essa, Michael Rubinstein, Yuan Hao, Glenn Entis, Irina Blok, and Daniel Castro Chin. Styledrop: Text-to-image synthesis of any style. In Alice Oh, Tristan Naumann, ...

    2023

  35. [43]

    Shaw, Yuan Hao, Han Zhang, Luisa Polania, Huiwen Chang, Lu Jiang, and Irfan Essa

    Kihyuk Sohn, Albert E. Shaw, Yuan Hao, Han Zhang, Luisa Polania, Huiwen Chang, Lu Jiang, and Irfan Essa. Learning disentangled prompts for compositional image synthesis.CoRR, abs/2306.00763, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Denoising diffusion implicit models

    Jiaming Song, Chenlin Meng, and Stefano Ermon. Denoising diffusion implicit models. In9th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2021, Virtual Event, Austria, May 3-7, 2021. OpenReview.net, 2021

    2021

  37. [45]

    Multi-object manipulation via object-centric neural scattering functions

    Stephen Tian, Yancheng Cai, Hong-Xing Yu, Sergey Zakharov, Katherine Liu, Adrien Gaidon, Yunzhu Li, and Jiajun Wu. Multi-object manipulation via object-centric neural scattering functions. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pag...

    2023

  38. [46]

    Plug-and-play diffusion features for text-driven image-to-image translation

    Narek Tumanyan, Michal Geyer, Shai Bagon, and Tali Dekel. Plug-and-play diffusion features for text-driven image-to-image translation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 1921–1930, June 2023

    1921

  39. [47]

    Nerf-art: Text-driven neural radiance fields stylization.IEEE Trans

    Can Wang, Ruixiang Jiang, Menglei Chai, Mingming He, Dongdong Chen, and Jing Liao. Nerf-art: Text-driven neural radiance fields stylization.IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 30(8):4983–4996, 2024

    2024

  40. [48]

    Instantstyle: Free lunch towards style-preserving in text-to-image generation.CoRR, abs/2404.02733, 2024

    Haofan Wang, Matteo Spinelli, Qixun Wang, Xu Bai, Zekui Qin, and Anthony Chen. Instantstyle: Free lunch towards style-preserving in text-to-image generation.CoRR, abs/2404.02733, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Instantstyle-plus: Style transfer with content-preserving in text-to-image generation.CoRR, abs/2407.00788, 2024

    Haofan Wang, Peng Xing, Renyuan Huang, Hao Ai, Qixun Wang, and Xu Bai. Instantstyle-plus: Style transfer with content-preserving in text-to-image generation.CoRR, abs/2407.00788, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Face photo-sketch synthesis and recognition.IEEE Transac- tions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, page 1955–1967, Nov 2009

    Xiaogang Wang and Xiaoou Tang. Face photo-sketch synthesis and recognition.IEEE Transac- tions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, page 1955–1967, Nov 2009

    1955

  43. [51]

    Parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods for pretrained language models: A critical review and assessment.CoRR, abs/2312.12148, 2023

    Lingling Xu, Haoran Xie, Si-Zhao Joe Qin, Xiaohui Tao, and Fu Lee Wang. Parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods for pretrained language models: A critical review and assessment.CoRR, abs/2312.12148, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Ni, and Heung- Yeung Shum

    Hao Zhang, Feng Li, Shilong Liu, Lei Zhang, Hang Su, Jun Zhu, Lionel M. Ni, and Heung- Yeung Shum. DINO: DETR with improved denoising anchor boxes for end-to-end object detection. InThe Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2023, Kigali, Rwanda, M...

    2023

  45. [53]

    Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models

    Lvmin Zhang, Anyi Rao, and Maneesh Agrawala. Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models. InIEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, ICCV 2023, Paris, France, October 1-6, 2023, pages 3813–3824. IEEE, 2023

    2023

  46. [54]

    Efros, Eli Shechtman, and Oliver Wang

    Richard Zhang, Phillip Isola, Alexei A. Efros, Eli Shechtman, and Oliver Wang. The unrea- sonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric. In2018 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2018, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, June 18-22, 2018, pag...

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.