REVIEW 2 cited by
Semantic Scaffolding: Augmenting Textual Structures with Domain-Specific Groupings for Accessible Data Exploration
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Semantic Scaffolding: Augmenting Textual Structures with Domain-Specific Groupings for Accessible Data Exploration
read the original abstract
Drawing connections between interesting groupings of data and their real-world meaning is an important, yet difficult, part of encountering a new dataset. A lay reader might see an interesting visual pattern in a chart but lack the domain expertise to explain its meaning. Or, a reader might be familiar with a real-world concept but struggle to express it in terms of a dataset's fields. In response, we developed semantic scaffolding, a technique for using domain-specific information from large language models (LLMs) to identify, explain, and formalize semantically meaningful data groupings. We present groupings in two ways: as semantic bins, which segment a field into domain-specific intervals and categories; and data highlights, which annotate subsets of data records with their real-world meaning. We demonstrate and evaluate this technique in Olli, an accessible visualization tool that exemplifies tensions around explicitly defining groupings while respecting the agency of readers to conduct independent data exploration. We conducted a study with 15 blind and low-vision (BLV) users and found that readers used semantic scaffolds to quickly understand the meaning of the data, but were often also critically aware of its influence on their interpretation.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Cohort-based Semantic Labeling: AI-Enabled Recovery of Visualization Semantics from Deployed SVGs
CSL recovers mark type (0.822), visualization role (0.853), and data role (0.860) macro accuracy from 102 SVGs via cohort decomposition and hybrid grounding, outperforming non-cohort baseline.
-
Touching or Chatting: The Utility of LLMs and Tactile Charts for Learning about Complex Chart Types by BLV Individuals
BLV learners prefer and feel they understand better when tactile charts are added to LLM-based explanations, though measured comprehension gains are negligible.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.