Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

R3eVision: A Survey on Robust Rendering, Restoration, and Enhancement for 3D Low-Level Vision

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This survey argues that robust 3D rendering from degraded inputs is one field, not a collection of patches, and formalizes it with a single degradation-aware rendering equation and a five-family taxonomy.

desk verdict A useful, well-organized survey whose formal notation is more ambition than load-bearing; worth serious peer review after fixing a few concrete errors. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.16262 v2 pith:NJZPGOVR submitted 2025-06-19 cs.CV

Weeyoung Kwon , Jeahun Sung , Minkyu Jeon , Chanho Eom , Jihyong Oh This is my paper
classification cs.CV
keywords 3Dlow-levelvisionneuralrenderingNeRFGaussiansplattingdegradation-awaresuper-resolutiondeblurringrestorationandenhancement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

R3eVision aims to establish that a new subfield, 3D Low-Level Vision (3D LLV), is coherent enough to survey as a whole: neural renderers such as NeRF and 3DGS assume clean, high-resolution multi-view inputs, so real-world degradations like noise, blur, low resolution, and weather artifacts corrupt the reconstructed scene. The paper formalizes the shared problem as degradation-aware rendering, $\hat{y}_i = R_D(s, c_i)$, and claims every current approach can be read as either sequence-based modeling (degrade a clean rendering) or composition-based modeling (fuse clean and degraded renderings). On that foundation it organizes the literature into five task families—super-resolution, deblurring, weather degradation removal, restoration, and enhancement—and positions this as the first comprehensive survey dedicated to 3D LLV. If the framing is right, researchers gain a map of the field and a common notation for comparing methods, plus a clear list of open directions such as blind, dynamic, sparse-view, real-time, and all-in-one 3D LLV.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the degradation-aware rendering function $R_D(s, c_i)$ of Eq. 2, with its two instantiations: sequence-based modeling (Eq. 3), where a clean renderer is followed by a view-specific degradation operator $H_i$, and composition-based modeling (Eq. 4), where clean and degraded renderings are fused by a differentiable composition function $C$. This pair of equations supplies a uniform notation for every method in the survey and is used to carve the taxonomy of Fig. 6 into five task families: super-resolution, deblurring, weather degradation removal, restoration, and enhancement.

What would settle it

A concrete check: run a systematic literature search for peer-reviewed surveys of 3D low-level vision published before this one; finding one would falsify the 'first comprehensive' claim. Alternatively, find one published 3D LLV method whose degradation-aware rendering is neither sequence-based (Eq. 3) nor composition-based (Eq. 4), which would falsify the dichotomy that organizes the taxonomy.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that recent efforts to make neural rendering robust to degraded inputs share a single problem structure, expressible as $\hat{y}_i = R_D(s, c_i)$: a 3D representation $s$ rendered from camera $c_i$ through a degradation-aware function $R_D$ that is either sequence-based ($R_{D_{seq}}(s,c_i) = H_i R_c(s,c_i)$, degrade after rendering) or composition-based ($R_{D_{comp}}(s,c_i) = C(R_c(s,c_i), R_d(s,c_i))$, fuse clean and degraded renderings). The paper's contribution is to read the literature through this lens and organize it into five task families, arguing that 3D LLV is a distinct, first-class research direction rather than a collection of ad-hoc patches. It also compiles representative methods, datasets, and evaluation metrics for each family, and identifies where the field's next advances are expected.

Load-bearing premise

The survey's value depends on its taxonomy being accurate and complete: if the five task families and their subcategories misplace significant methods, omit an important line of work, or misdescribe technical details, the map and the 'first comprehensive survey' claim lose their usefulness.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Methods that currently seem unrelated—super-resolving a NeRF, deblurring a dynamic 3DGS, removing haze with atmospheric models—can be described within one notation, which should make cross-method comparison and modular combination easier.
  • The five-family taxonomy gives practitioners a direct route from a degradation type (blur, haze, low light, missing data, low resolution) to a family of solutions and its representative methods.
  • The survey identifies datasets and metrics for each family, so benchmarking a new 3D LLV method can follow an established protocol instead of being improvised.
  • The future-directions list (blind LLV, dynamic scenes, sparse views, real-time, all-in-one, interactive restoration) marks where the field expects its next advances.
  • Application areas such as autonomous driving, AR/VR, and robotics are concrete beneficiaries: robust 3D LLV is framed as a prerequisite for reliable perception from degraded sensors.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test of the paper's dichotomy: if a published 3D LLV method uses a degradation model that is neither a post-rendering operator nor a differentiable fusion of clean and degraded renderings, the sequence/composition split is not exhaustive, and a third category would be needed.
  • The formalization suggests a benchmark the authors do not run: generate multi-view inputs with identical degradations and compare a sequence-based and a composition-based model under matched compute; the outcome would reveal whether the choice of $R_D$ form is a substantive design axis or a notational one.
  • The survey stops at cataloging 2D-to-3D integration; one could extend the same notation to end-to-end joint optimization, where the degradation model and the scene representation are learned simultaneously from raw sensor streams rather than from synthetic degradations.
  • Because the paper positions 3D LLV as foundational for robust 3D perception, a plausible downstream consequence is that evaluation should shift from single-image quality metrics toward multi-view consistency metrics; the survey lists temporal optical flow but does not itself make this argument.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper presents a survey of 3D Low-Level Vision (3D LLV), which extends classical 2D low-level vision tasks such as super-resolution, deblurring, weather degradation removal, restoration, and enhancement to 3D neural rendering frameworks including NeRF and 3D Gaussian Splatting. The survey introduces a formalization of degradation-aware rendering (Eq. 2) with two proposed degradation modeling strategies, sequence-based (Eq. 3) and composition-based (Eq. 4), and uses this framing to organize a taxonomy of representative methods. It also reviews datasets, evaluation metrics, training strategies, and future research directions.

Significance. If the formalization and taxonomy are made fully coherent, this survey could be a valuable entry point to a rapidly growing subfield. The organization into five task families, the structured taxonomy in Fig. 6, the compilation of datasets and metrics in Tables 1 and 2, and the discussion of future directions are useful contributions. The paper does not present novel algorithms or machine-checked proofs; its value depends on the accuracy and completeness of its descriptions and on whether the proposed formalization genuinely unifies the surveyed methods. The collected method descriptions are generally accurate and the survey is well structured, which is a credit to the authors. However, the central formalization currently does not cover several method families it claims to unify, and at least one formal equation is dimensionally wrong; these issues need to be addressed before the survey can serve as a reliable reference.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 1, Eqs. 2-4] The binary distinction between sequence-based and composition-based degradation is not instantiated by many of the surveyed methods. For example, trajectory-based deblurring (Section 4.2.2, Eq. 14) averages sharp renders over a continuous trajectory, which is not a view-specific operator H_i applied to a single clean render; event-based methods (Section 4.2.1, Eqs. 12-13) require the event stream E(t) as an additional input, so R_D would need more arguments than (s, c_i); detection-based weather removal (Section 4.3.2, DerainNeRF and WeatherGS) trains with a masked loss, so R_D is undefined for masked pixels; and anti-aliasing methods (Section 4.5.2.1, Mip-NeRF and Zip-NeRF) introduce degradation through the sampling process itself rather than through a post-rendering operator. Please either extend the formalism to cover these cases (e.g., by including masks, event streams, time integration, and an explicit handling of sampling footprint) or clearly scope Eq. 2 as a high-level abstraction that does not capture every method discussed in the survey.
  2. [Section 2 and Eq. 2] Eq. 2 assumes known camera parameters c_i, but Section 2 identifies pose estimation from degraded inputs as a core failure mode and illustrates the problem in Fig. 4. This is a direct contradiction between the formalization and the challenges the survey itself emphasizes. The authors should either extend the degradation-aware rendering function to account for unknown or estimated poses, or explicitly state that Eq. 2 presupposes poses obtained from a separate robust SfM pipeline and is not intended to cover pose-refinement methods.
  3. [Section 4.2.3, Eq. 19] The circle-of-confusion radius formula R_CoC = (1/(2Q)) |1/z_o - 1/f| with Q = F·A is dimensionally inconsistent: the left-hand side is a length, while the right-hand side has units of 1/length^3 if F and A are measured in meters (or, more generally, the units do not match). The standard thin-lens CoC derivation does not produce this expression. Please replace Eq. 19 with a correct formula and verify the associated discussion in Sections 4.2.3 and 5.3.2 that depends on it.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Figure 12] The caption of Figure 12 cites reference [96] for Mip-NeRF, but the text in Section 4.5.2.1 correctly cites [39]; reference [96] is the Dark Channel Prior paper and is unrelated to Mip-NeRF. Please correct the citation.
  2. [Fig. 6] The taxonomy figure contains typographical errors in method names: "S2Gaussain" should be "S2Gaussian", "SuperGaussain" should be "SuperGaussian", and "CoCoGaussain" should be "CoCoGaussian".
  3. [Section 3.1] The phrase "azimuth azimuth and elevation angles" contains a duplicated word; it should read "azimuth and elevation angles".
  4. [Section 1] The claim that this is "the first comprehensive survey dedicated to 3D LLV" is not supported by a comparison with existing related surveys on neural rendering, 3D Gaussian splatting, or robust reconstruction from degraded inputs. Please add a brief discussion of prior surveys or soften the claim.
  5. [Section 5.1, Table 1] The "Type" entry for BlendedMVS is listed as "R S" without explanation; please clarify that this denotes a mix of real and synthetic scenes, and apply similar clarity to other ambiguous entries in the table.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the survey's formalization is descriptive notation, and its taxonomy is assembled from external literature.

full rationale

This paper is a survey, not a derivation or prediction pipeline. Its formal contribution is Eq. 2 (y_i = R_D(s, c_i)) together with the two decomposition strategies in Eqs. 3 and 4. These equations are introduced as definitions or organizing notation: they are not fitted to data, they do not generate benchmark predictions, and no later result is obtained by substituting them back into themselves. The taxonomy in Fig. 6 is built by citing external published methods, and no category is justified solely by the present authors' prior work. The authors do cite their own earlier papers (ExBluRF [20], MoBluRF [30], MoBGS [10]) as representative trajectory-based deblurring methods, but those citations are ordinary survey entries used as examples; they do not function as a load-bearing premise that forces a conclusion. The skeptical concern that Eq. 2 does not cleanly express trajectory averaging (Eq. 14), event-stream models (Eqs. 12-13), masking-based weather removal, or footprint-based anti-aliasing is a question about whether the proposed common notation accurately covers the surveyed field; such a completeness or accuracy objection is not an instance of circularity. There is no fitted parameter relabeled as a prediction, no self-citation chain carrying the central claim, and no derivation that is equivalent to its input by construction. A survey's utility can be criticized by taxonomy coverage, but nothing in this paper's own argument reduces to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The survey introduces no new free parameters, axioms beyond the standard assumptions of literature review, or invented entities. Its claims rest on the accuracy and completeness of its literature coverage and on the usefulness of its proposed taxonomy. The formalization in Eqs. 2-4 is a descriptive framework that does not require fitting or additional assumptions beyond the standard degradation model y = Hx + n.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption The proposed taxonomy of 3D LLV tasks (SR, deblurring, weather removal, restoration, enhancement) and their subcategories is a valid and useful way to organize the literature.
    The survey's entire structure depends on this categorization being meaningful and non-arbitrary (Section 1, Fig. 6).
  • domain assumption The descriptions of the surveyed methods are faithful to the original papers and the cited references correspond to the described works.
    The survey is a review, so its correctness relies on accurate reporting of prior work (throughout Sections 4 and 5).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of R3eVision: A Survey on Robust Rendering, Restoration, and Enhancement for 3D Low-Level Vision." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NJZPGOVR

@misc{pith2026250616262,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: R3eVision: A Survey on Robust Rendering, Restoration, and Enhancement for 3D Low-Level Vision},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NJZPGOVR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.16262}
}
read the original abstract

Neural rendering methods such as Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF) and 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) have achieved significant progress in photorealistic 3D scene reconstruction and novel view synthesis. However, most existing models assume clean and high-resolution (HR) multi-view inputs, which limits their robustness under real-world degradations such as noise, blur, low-resolution (LR), and weather-induced artifacts. To address these limitations, the emerging field of 3D Low-Level Vision (3D LLV) extends classical 2D Low-Level Vision tasks including super-resolution (SR), deblurring, weather degradation removal, restoration, and enhancement into the 3D spatial domain. This survey, referred to as R\textsuperscript{3}eVision, provides a comprehensive overview of robust rendering, restoration, and enhancement for 3D LLV by formalizing the degradation-aware rendering problem and identifying key challenges related to spatio-temporal consistency and ill-posed optimization. Recent methods that integrate LLV into neural rendering frameworks are categorized to illustrate how they enable high-fidelity 3D reconstruction under adverse conditions. Application domains such as autonomous driving, AR/VR, and robotics are also discussed, where reliable 3D perception from degraded inputs is critical. By reviewing representative methods, datasets, and evaluation protocols, this work positions 3D LLV as a fundamental direction for robust 3D content generation and scene-level reconstruction in real-world environments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.16262 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of 3D LLV tasks, including Super-Resolution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overview of the degradation-aware rendering pipeline for 3D Low-Level Vision (3D LLV). During the training stage [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparison of two modeling approaches for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison between GT and estimated camera poses [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Illustration of representative visual degradation factors that cause performance degradation in neural rendering systems. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Taxonomy of 3D LLV tasks, including SR, Deblurring, Weather degradation removal, Restoration and Enhancement. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Overview of representative SR integration strategies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Four representative approaches for 3D deblurring. (a) Trajectory-based methods initialize camera poses using [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Two representative approaches for weather degradation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Overview of representative 3D restoration approaches [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Two representative approaches for low-light enhance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Comparison of two representative detail enhance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Illustrates two representative approaches for tex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_13.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CoDe-NeRF: Neural Rendering via Dynamic Coefficient Decomposition

    cs.CV 2025-08 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A neural rendering method that decomposes appearance into static bases and dynamic coefficients, improving the sharpness of specular highlights in novel view synthesis.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

190 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [96]

    Single image haze removal using dark channel prior,

    K. He, J. Sun, and X. Tang, “Single image haze removal using dark channel prior,”IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2010

    2010

  2. [39]

    Mip-nerf: A multiscale represen- tation for anti-aliasing neural radiance fields,

    J. T. Barron, B. Mildenhall, M. Tancik, P. Hedman, R. Martin- Brualla, and P. P. Srinivasan, “Mip-nerf: A multiscale represen- tation for anti-aliasing neural radiance fields,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2021

    2021

  3. [1]

    3d gaussian splatting: Survey, technologies, challenges, and opportunities,

    Y. Bao, T. Ding, J. Huo, Y. Liu, Y. Li, W. Li, Y. Gao, and J. Luo, “3d gaussian splatting: Survey, technologies, challenges, and opportunities,”IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Sys- tems for Video Technology, 2025

    2025

  4. [2]

    Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis,

    B. Mildenhall, P. P. Srinivasan, M. Tancik, J. T. Barron, R. Ramamoorthi, and R. Ng, “Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis,”Communications of the ACM, 2021

    2021

  5. [3]

    3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering

    B. Kerbl, G. Kopanas, T. Leimk¨ uhler, and G. Drettakis, “3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering. ”ACM Transactions on Graphics, 2023

    2023

  6. [4]

    E2nerf: Event enhanced neural radiance fields from blurry images,

    Y. Qi, L. Zhu, Y. Zhang, and J. Li, “E2nerf: Event enhanced neural radiance fields from blurry images,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2023

    2023

  7. [5]

    Mitigating motion blur in neural radiance fields with events and frames,

    M. Cannici and D. Scaramuzza, “Mitigating motion blur in neural radiance fields with events and frames,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024

    2024

  8. [6]

    Dyblurf: Dynamic neural radiance fields from blurry monocular video,

    H. Sun, X. Li, L. Shen, X. Ye, K. Xian, and Z. Cao, “Dyblurf: Dynamic neural radiance fields from blurry monocular video,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024

    2024

Show all 190 references
  1. [7]

    Bard-gs: Blur- aware reconstruction of dynamic scenes via gaussian splatting,

    Y. Lu, Y. Zhou, D. Liu, T. Liang, and Y. Yin, “Bard-gs: Blur- aware reconstruction of dynamic scenes via gaussian splatting,” Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2025

    2025

  2. [8]

    Nerflix: High-quality neural view synthesis by learning a degradation-driven inter-viewpoint mixer,

    K. Zhou, W. Li, Y. Wang, T. Hu, N. Jiang, X. Han, and J. Lu, “Nerflix: High-quality neural view synthesis by learning a degradation-driven inter-viewpoint mixer,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023

    2023

  3. [9]

    Rustnerf: Robust neu- ral radiance field with low-quality images,

    M. Li, M. Lu, X. Li, and S. Zhang, “Rustnerf: Robust neu- ral radiance field with low-quality images,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.03257, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  4. [10]

    Mobgs: Motion deblurring dynamic 3d gaus- sian splatting for blurry monocular video,

    M.-Q. V. Bui, J. Park, J. L. G. Bello, J. Moon, J. Oh, and M. Kim, “Mobgs: Motion deblurring dynamic 3d gaus- sian splatting for blurry monocular video,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.15122, 2025

    2025

  5. [11]

    Supergs: Super- resolution 3d gaussian splatting via latent feature field and gradient-guided splitting,

    S. Xie, Z. Wang, Y. Zhu, and C. Pan, “Supergs: Super- resolution 3d gaussian splatting via latent feature field and gradient-guided splitting,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.02571, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  6. [12]

    Gaura: Generalizable approach for unified restora- tion and rendering of arbitrary views,

    V. Gupta, R. S. V. Girish, T. Mukund Varma, A. Tewari, and K. Mitra, “Gaura: Generalizable approach for unified restora- tion and rendering of arbitrary views,” inProceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, 2024

    2024

  7. [13]

    Autosplat: Constrained gaussian splatting for autonomous driving scene reconstruction,

    M. Khan, H. Fazlali, D. Sharma, T. Cao, D. Bai, Y. Ren, and B. Liu, “Autosplat: Constrained gaussian splatting for autonomous driving scene reconstruction,” inProceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2025

    2025

  8. [14]

    Splatad: Real-time lidar and camera rendering with 3d gaussian splatting for autonomous driving,

    G. Hess, C. Lindstr¨ om, M. Fatemi, C. Petersson, and L. Svens- son, “Splatad: Real-time lidar and camera rendering with 3d gaussian splatting for autonomous driving,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.16816, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  9. [15]

    Vr- nerf: High-fidelity virtualized walkable spaces,

    L. Xu, V. Agrawal, W. Laney, T. Garcia, A. Bansal, C. Kim, S. Rota Bul` o, L. Porzi, P. Kontschieder, A. Boˇ ziˇ cet al., “Vr- nerf: High-fidelity virtualized walkable spaces,” inProceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH Asia 2023 Conference, 2023

    2023

  10. [16]

    Magic nerf lens: Interactive fusion of neural radi- ance fields for virtual facility inspection,

    K. Li, S. Schmidt, T. Rolff, R. Bacher, W. Leemans, and F. Steinicke, “Magic nerf lens: Interactive fusion of neural radi- ance fields for virtual facility inspection,”Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 2024

    2024

  11. [17]

    Graspnerf: Multiview-based 6-dof grasp detection for trans- parent and specular objects using generalizable nerf,

    Q. Dai, Y. Zhu, Y. Geng, C. Ruan, J. Zhang, and H. Wang, “Graspnerf: Multiview-based 6-dof grasp detection for trans- parent and specular objects using generalizable nerf,” inPro- ceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2023

    2023

  12. [18]

    Splatsim: Zero-shot sim2real transfer of rgb manipulation policies using gaussian splatting,

    M. N. Qureshi, S. Garg, F. Yandun, D. Held, G. Kantor, and A. Silwal, “Splatsim: Zero-shot sim2real transfer of rgb manipulation policies using gaussian splatting,” 2025

    2025

  13. [19]

    Gs-slam: Dense visual slam with 3d gaussian splatting,

    C. Yan, D. Qu, D. Xu, B. Zhao, Z. Wang, D. Wang, and X. Li, “Gs-slam: Dense visual slam with 3d gaussian splatting,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024

    2024

  14. [20]

    Exblurf: Efficient radiance fields for extreme motion blurred images,

    D. Lee, J. Oh, J. Rim, S. Cho, and K. M. Lee, “Exblurf: Efficient radiance fields for extreme motion blurred images,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2023. 21

    2023

  15. [21]

    Pdrf: Progressively deblurring radiance field for fast and robust scene reconstruction from blurry images,

    C. Peng and R. Chellappa, “Pdrf: Progressively deblurring radiance field for fast and robust scene reconstruction from blurry images,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.08049, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  16. [22]

    Building rome in a day,

    S. Agarwal, Y. Furukawa, N. Snavely, I. Simon, B. Curless, S. M. Seitz, and R. Szeliski, “Building rome in a day,”Com- munications of the ACM, 2011

    2011

  17. [23]

    Discrete-continuous optimization for large-scale structure from motion,

    D. Crandall, A. Owens, N. Snavely, and D. Huttenlocher, “Discrete-continuous optimization for large-scale structure from motion,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2011

    2011

  18. [24]

    Photo tourism: explor- ing photo collections in 3d,

    N. Snavely, S. M. Seitz, and R. Szeliski, “Photo tourism: explor- ing photo collections in 3d,” inACM SIGGRAPH Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, 2006

    2006

  19. [25]

    Structure-from-motion revisited,

    J. L. Schonberger and J.-M. Frahm, “Structure-from-motion revisited,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2016

    2016

  20. [26]

    Pixelwise view selection for unstructured multi-view stereo,

    J. L. Schonberger, E. Zheng, J.-M. Frahm, and M. Pollefeys, “Pixelwise view selection for unstructured multi-view stereo,” inProceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vi- sion, 2016

    2016

  21. [27]

    Robust dynamic radiance fields,

    Y.-L. Liu, C. Gao, A. Meuleman, H.-Y. Tseng, A. Saraf, C. Kim, Y.-Y. Chuang, J. Kopf, and J.-B. Huang, “Robust dynamic radiance fields,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023

    2023

  22. [28]

    Nerf-sr: High quality neural radiance fields using super- sampling,

    C. Wang, X. Wu, Y.-C. Guo, S.-H. Zhang, Y.-W. Tai, and S.-M. Hu, “Nerf-sr: High quality neural radiance fields using super- sampling,” inProceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 2022

    2022

  23. [29]

    Refsr-nerf: Towards high fidelity and super resolution view synthesis,

    X. Huang, W. Li, J. Hu, H. Chen, and Y. Wang, “Refsr-nerf: Towards high fidelity and super resolution view synthesis,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023

    2023

  24. [30]

    Moblurf: Motion deblurring neural radiance fields for blurry monocular video,

    M.-Q. V. Bui, J. Park, J. Oh, and M. Kim, “Moblurf: Motion deblurring neural radiance fields for blurry monocular video,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelli- gence, 2025

    2025

  25. [31]

    Dof-gs: Adjustable depth-of-field 3d gaussian splatting for refocusing, defocus ren- dering and blur removal,

    Y. Wang, P. Chakravarthula, and B. Chen, “Dof-gs: Adjustable depth-of-field 3d gaussian splatting for refocusing, defocus ren- dering and blur removal,”Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2025

    2025

  26. [32]

    Cocogaussian: Leveraging circle of confu- sion for gaussian splatting from defocused images,

    J. Lee, S. Cho, T. Kim, H.-D. Jang, M. Lee, G. Cha, D. Wee, D. Lee, and S. Lee, “Cocogaussian: Leveraging circle of confu- sion for gaussian splatting from defocused images,”Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2025

    2025

  27. [33]

    Dehazing-nerf: neural radiance fields from hazy images,

    T. Li, L. Li, W. Wang, and Z. Feng, “Dehazing-nerf: neural radiance fields from hazy images,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.11448, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  28. [34]

    Scatternerf: Seeing through fog with physically- based inverse neural rendering,

    A. Ramazzina, M. Bijelic, S. Walz, A. Sanvito, D. Scheuble, and F. Heide, “Scatternerf: Seeing through fog with physically- based inverse neural rendering,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2023

    2023

  29. [35]

    Derainnerf: 3d scene estima- tion with adhesive waterdrop removal,

    Y. Li, J. Wu, L. Zhao, and P. Liu, “Derainnerf: 3d scene estima- tion with adhesive waterdrop removal,” inIEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2024

    2024

  30. [36]

    Nerf in the dark: High dynamic range view synthesis from noisy raw images,

    B. Mildenhall, P. Hedman, R. Martin-Brualla, P. P. Srini- vasan, and J. T. Barron, “Nerf in the dark: High dynamic range view synthesis from noisy raw images,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022

    2022

  31. [37]

    Lighting up nerf via unsupervised decomposition and enhancement,

    H. Wang, X. Xu, K. Xu, and R. W. Lau, “Lighting up nerf via unsupervised decomposition and enhancement,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vi- sion, 2023

    2023

  32. [38]

    Mip-nerf 360: Unbounded anti-aliased neural ra- diance fields,

    J. T. Barron, B. Mildenhall, D. Verbin, P. P. Srinivasan, and P. Hedman, “Mip-nerf 360: Unbounded anti-aliased neural ra- diance fields,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022

    2022

  33. [40]

    Efficient ray tracing of volume data,

    M. Levoy, “Efficient ray tracing of volume data,”ACM Trans- actions on Graphics, 1990

    1990

  34. [41]

    Optical models for direct volume rendering,

    N. Max, “Optical models for direct volume rendering,”IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 1995

    1995

  35. [42]

    Fourier features let networks learn high frequency functions in low dimensional domains,

    M. Tancik, P. Srinivasan, B. Mildenhall, S. Fridovich-Keil, N. Raghavan, U. Singhal, R. Ramamoorthi, J. Barron, and R. Ng, “Fourier features let networks learn high frequency functions in low dimensional domains,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2020

    2020

  36. [43]

    On the spectral bias of neural networks,

    N. Rahaman, A. Baratin, D. Arpit, F. Draxler, M. Lin, F. Ham- precht, Y. Bengio, and A. Courville, “On the spectral bias of neural networks,” inInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 2019

    2019

  37. [44]

    Frequency bias in neural networks for input of non-uniform density,

    R. Basri, M. Galun, A. Geifman, D. Jacobs, Y. Kasten, and S. Kritchman, “Frequency bias in neural networks for input of non-uniform density,” inInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 2020

    2020

  38. [45]

    Plenoxels: Radiance fields without neural net- works,

    S. Fridovich-Keil, A. Yu, M. Tancik, Q. Chen, B. Recht, and A. Kanazawa, “Plenoxels: Radiance fields without neural net- works,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022

    2022

  39. [46]

    Instant neu- ral graphics primitives with a multiresolution hash encoding,

    T. M¨ uller, A. Evans, C. Schied, and A. Keller, “Instant neu- ral graphics primitives with a multiresolution hash encoding,” ACM transactions on graphics, 2022

    2022

  40. [47]

    Pulsar: Efficient sphere-based neural rendering,

    C. Lassner and M. Zollhofer, “Pulsar: Efficient sphere-based neural rendering,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2021

    2021

  41. [48]

    Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity,

    Z. Wang, A. C. Bovik, H. R. Sheikh, and E. P. Simoncelli, “Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity,”IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2004

    2004

  42. [49]

    Cross-guided optimization of radiance fields with multi-view image super-resolution for high-resolution novel view synthesis,

    Y. Yoon and K.-J. Yoon, “Cross-guided optimization of radiance fields with multi-view image super-resolution for high-resolution novel view synthesis,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023

    2023

  43. [50]

    Enhanced deep residual networks for single image super-resolution,

    B. Lim, S. Son, H. Kim, S. Nah, and K. Mu Lee, “Enhanced deep residual networks for single image super-resolution,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition workshops, 2017

    2017

  44. [51]

    Swinir: Image restoration using swin transformer,

    J. Liang, J. Cao, G. Sun, K. Zhang, L. Van Gool, and R. Tim- ofte, “Swinir: Image restoration using swin transformer,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2021

    2021

  45. [52]

    Fastsr- nerf: improving nerf efficiency on consumer devices with a sim- ple super-resolution pipeline,

    C.-Y. Lin, Q. Fu, T. Merth, K. Yang, and A. Ranjan, “Fastsr- nerf: improving nerf efficiency on consumer devices with a sim- ple super-resolution pipeline,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, 2024

    2024

  46. [53]

    Srgs: Super-resolution 3d gaussian splatting,

    X. Feng, Y. He, Y. Wang, Y. Yang, W. Li, Y. Chen, Z. Kuang, J. Fan, Y. Junet al., “Srgs: Super-resolution 3d gaussian splatting,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.10318, 2024

    2024

  47. [54]

    Sequence matters: Harnessing video models in 3d super- resolution,

    H.-k. Ko, D. Park, Y. Park, B. Lee, J. Han, and E. Park, “Sequence matters: Harnessing video models in 3d super- resolution,” inProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Arti- ficial Intelligence, 2025

    2025

  48. [55]

    Orb: An efficient alternative to sift or surf,

    E. Rublee, V. Rabaud, K. Konolige, and G. Bradski, “Orb: An efficient alternative to sift or surf,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2011

    2011

  49. [56]

    Rethinking alignment in video super-resolution transformers,

    S. Shi, J. Gu, L. Xie, X. Wang, Y. Yang, and C. Dong, “Rethinking alignment in video super-resolution transformers,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022

    2022

  50. [57]

    Super-nerf: view-consistent detail gen- eration for nerf super-resolution,

    Y. Han, T. Yu, X. Yu, D. Xu, B. Zheng, Z. Dai, C. Yang, Y. Wang, and Q. Dai, “Super-nerf: view-consistent detail gen- eration for nerf super-resolution,”IEEE Transactions on Visu- alization and Computer Graphics, 2024

    2024

  51. [58]

    Esrgan: Enhanced super-resolution generative adversarial networks,

    X. Wang, K. Yu, S. Wu, J. Gu, Y. Liu, C. Dong, Y. Qiao, and C. Change Loy, “Esrgan: Enhanced super-resolution generative adversarial networks,” inProceedings of the European Confer- ence on Computer Vision, 2018

    2018

  52. [59]

    Disr-nerf: Diffusion-guided view-consistent super-resolution nerf,

    J. L. Lee, C. Li, and G. H. Lee, “Disr-nerf: Diffusion-guided view-consistent super-resolution nerf,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024

    2024

  53. [60]

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models,

    R. Rombach, A. Blattmann, D. Lorenz, P. Esser, and B. Om- mer, “High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022

    2022

  54. [61]

    Dreamfu- 22 sion: Text-to-3d using 2d diffusion,

    B. Poole, A. Jain, J. T. Barron, and B. Mildenhall, “Dreamfu- 22 sion: Text-to-3d using 2d diffusion,”Proceedings of the Interna- tional Conference on Learning Representations, 2023

    2023

  55. [62]

    Gaussiansr: 3d gaus- sian super-resolution with 2d diffusion priors,

    X. Yu, H. Zhu, T. He, and Z. Chen, “Gaussiansr: 3d gaus- sian super-resolution with 2d diffusion priors,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.10111, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  56. [63]

    S2gaussian: Sparse- view super-resolution 3d gaussian splatting,

    Y. Wan, M. Shao, Y. Cheng, and W. Zuo, “S2gaussian: Sparse- view super-resolution 3d gaussian splatting,”Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2025

    2025

  57. [64]

    Vision transformers for dense prediction,

    R. Ranftl, A. Bochkovskiy, and V. Koltun, “Vision transformers for dense prediction,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Inter- national Conference on Computer Vision, 2021

    2021

  58. [65]

    Resshift: Efficient diffusion model for image super-resolution by residual shifting,

    Z. Yue, J. Wang, and C. C. Loy, “Resshift: Efficient diffusion model for image super-resolution by residual shifting,”Ad- vances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023

    2023

  59. [66]

    Supergaussian: Repurposing video models for 3d super resolution,

    Y. Shen, D. Ceylan, P. Guerrero, Z. Xu, N. J. Mitra, S. Wang, and A. Fr¨ uhst¨ uck, “Supergaussian: Repurposing video models for 3d super resolution,” inProceedings of the European Con- ference on Computer Vision, 2024

    2024

  60. [67]

    Videogigagan: Towards detail-rich video super-resolution,

    Y. Xu, T. Park, R. Zhang, Y. Zhou, E. Shechtman, F. Liu, J.-B. Huang, and D. Liu, “Videogigagan: Towards detail-rich video super-resolution,”Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2025

    2025

  61. [68]

    Deblur-nerf: Neural radiance fields from blurry images,

    L. Ma, X. Li, J. Liao, Q. Zhang, X. Wang, J. Wang, and P. V. Sander, “Deblur-nerf: Neural radiance fields from blurry images,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022

    2022

  62. [69]

    Bags: Blur agnostic gaussian splatting through multi-scale kernel modeling,

    C. Peng, Y. Tang, Y. Zhou, N. Wang, X. Liu, D. Li, and R. Chellappa, “Bags: Blur agnostic gaussian splatting through multi-scale kernel modeling,” inProceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, 2024

    2024

  63. [70]

    Bad-nerf: Bundle adjusted deblur neural radiance fields,

    P. Wang, L. Zhao, R. Ma, and P. Liu, “Bad-nerf: Bundle adjusted deblur neural radiance fields,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023

    2023

  64. [71]

    Bad-gaussians: Bundle adjusted deblur gaussian splatting,

    L. Zhao, P. Wang, and P. Liu, “Bad-gaussians: Bundle adjusted deblur gaussian splatting,” inProceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, 2024

    2024

  65. [72]

    Crim-gs: Contin- uous rigid motion-aware gaussian splatting from motion blur images,

    J. Lee, D. Kim, D. Lee, S. Cho, and S. Lee, “Crim-gs: Contin- uous rigid motion-aware gaussian splatting from motion blur images,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.03923, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  66. [73]

    De- blur4dgs: 4d gaussian splatting from blurry monocular video,

    R. Wu, Z. Zhang, M. Chen, X. Fan, Z. Yan, and W. Zuo, “De- blur4dgs: 4d gaussian splatting from blurry monocular video,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.06424, 2024

    2024

  67. [74]

    Comogaussian: Continuous motion-aware gaussian splatting from motion-blurred images,

    J. Lee, D. Kim, D. Lee, S. Cho, M. Lee, W. Lee, T. Kim, D. Wee, and S. Lee, “Comogaussian: Continuous motion-aware gaussian splatting from motion-blurred images,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.0533, 2025

    2025

  68. [75]

    E- nerf: Neural radiance fields from a moving event camera,

    S. Klenk, L. Koestler, D. Scaramuzza, and D. Cremers, “E- nerf: Neural radiance fields from a moving event camera,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2023

    2023

  69. [76]

    Evagaussians: Event stream as- sisted gaussian splatting from blurry images,

    W. Yu, C. Feng, J. Tang, J. Yang, Z. Tang, X. Jia, Y. Yang, L. Yuan, and Y. Tian, “Evagaussians: Event stream as- sisted gaussian splatting from blurry images,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.20224, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  70. [77]

    Eadeblur- gs: Event assisted 3d deblur reconstruction with gaussian splat- ting,

    Y. Weng, Z. Shen, R. Chen, Q. Wang, and J. Wang, “Eadeblur- gs: Event assisted 3d deblur reconstruction with gaussian splat- ting,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.13520, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  71. [78]

    Diet-gs: Diffusion prior and event stream-assisted motion deblurring 3d gaussian splatting,

    S. Lee and G. H. Lee, “Diet-gs: Diffusion prior and event stream-assisted motion deblurring 3d gaussian splatting,”Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2025

    2025

  72. [79]

    Dp-nerf: Deblurred neural radiance field with physical scene priors,

    D. Lee, M. Lee, C. Shin, and S. Lee, “Dp-nerf: Deblurred neural radiance field with physical scene priors,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023

    2023

  73. [80]

    Deblurring 3d gaussian splatting,

    B. Lee, H. Lee, X. Sun, U. Ali, and E. Park, “Deblurring 3d gaussian splatting,” inProceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, 2024

    2024

  74. [81]

    Bringing a blurry frame alive at high frame-rate with an event camera,

    L. Pan, C. Scheerlinck, X. Yu, R. Hartley, M. Liu, and Y. Dai, “Bringing a blurry frame alive at high frame-rate with an event camera,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2019

    2019

  75. [82]

    Esim: an open event camera simulator,

    H. Rebecq, D. Gehrig, and D. Scaramuzza, “Esim: an open event camera simulator,” inConference on Robot Learning, 2018

    2018

  76. [83]

    v2e: From video frames to realistic dvs events,

    Y. Hu, S.-C. Liu, and T. Delbruck, “v2e: From video frames to realistic dvs events,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Confer- ence on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2021

    2021

  77. [84]

    Lush-nerf: Light- ing up and sharpening nerfs for low-light scenes,

    Z. Qu, K. Xu, G. P. Hancke, and R. W. Lau, “Lush-nerf: Light- ing up and sharpening nerfs for low-light scenes,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2024

    2024

  78. [85]

    Light field blind motion deblurring,

    P. P. Srinivasan, R. Ng, and R. Ramamoorthi, “Light field blind motion deblurring,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Confer- ence on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2017

    2017

  79. [86]

    Neural ordinary differential equations,

    R. T. Chen, Y. Rubanova, J. Bettencourt, and D. K. Duvenaud, “Neural ordinary differential equations,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2018

    2018

  80. [87]

    Track anything: Segment anything meets videos,

    J. Yang, M. Gao, Z. Li, S. Gao, F. Wang, and F. Zheng, “Track anything: Segment anything meets videos,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.11968, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  81. [88]

    Exploiting deblurring networks for radiance fields,

    H. Choi, H. Yang, J. Han, and S. Cho, “Exploiting deblurring networks for radiance fields,”Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2025

    2025

  82. [89]

    Simple baselines for image restoration,

    L. Chen, X. Chu, X. Zhang, and J. Sun, “Simple baselines for image restoration,” inProceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, 2022

    2022

  83. [90]

    Weathergs: 3d scene reconstruction in adverse weather conditions via gaussian splatting,

    C. Qian, Y. Guo, W. Li, and G. Markkula, “Weathergs: 3d scene reconstruction in adverse weather conditions via gaussian splatting,”IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2025

    2025

  84. [91]

    Isra¨ el, F

    H. Isra¨ el, F. Kasten, H. Isra¨ el, and F. Kasten,Koschmieders theorie der horizontalen sichtweite, 1959

    1959

  85. [92]

    Attentive generative adversarial network for raindrop removal from a single image,

    R. Qian, R. T. Tan, W. Yang, J. Su, and J. Liu, “Attentive generative adversarial network for raindrop removal from a single image,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2018

    2018

  86. [93]

    Dehazen- erf: Multi-image haze removal and 3d shape reconstruction using neural radiance fields,

    W.-T. Chen, W. Yifan, S.-Y. Kuo, and G. Wetzstein, “Dehazen- erf: Multi-image haze removal and 3d shape reconstruction using neural radiance fields,” inInternational Conference on 3D Vision, 2024

    2024

  87. [94]

    Dehazegs: Seeing through fog with 3d gaussian splatting,

    J. Yu, Y. Wang, Z. Lu, J. Guo, Y. Li, H. Qin, and X. Zhang, “Dehazegs: Seeing through fog with 3d gaussian splatting,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.03659, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  88. [95]

    Chandrasekhar,Radiative transfer, 2013

    S. Chandrasekhar,Radiative transfer, 2013

    2013

  89. [97]

    Optics of the atmosphere: scattering by molecules and particles,

    E. J. McCartney, “Optics of the atmosphere: scattering by molecules and particles,”New York, 1976

    1976

  90. [98]

    Image enhancement using bright channel prior,

    S. Sun and X. Guo, “Image enhancement using bright channel prior,” inInternational Conference on Industrial Informatics – Computing Technology, Intelligent Technology, Industrial Information Integration, 2016

    2016

  91. [99]

    Towards degradation-robust reconstruction in generalizable nerf,

    C. H. Park, K. L. Cheng, Z. Wang, and Q. Chen, “Towards degradation-robust reconstruction in generalizable nerf,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.11691, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  92. [100]

    U2nerf: Un- supervised underwater image restoration and neural radiance fields,

    V. Gupta, S. Manoj, M. Varma, and K. Mitra, “U2nerf: Un- supervised underwater image restoration and neural radiance fields,”Proceedings of the Second Tiny Papers Track at the International Conference on Learning Representations Work- shops, 2024

    2024

  93. [101]

    Hypernetworks,

    D. Ha, A. Dai, and Q. V. Le, “Hypernetworks,” inProceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations, 2017

    2017

  94. [102]

    Nerfool: Uncovering the vulnerability of generalizable neu- ral radiance fields against adversarial perturbations,

    Y. Fu, Y. Yuan, S. Kundu, S. Wu, S. Zhang, and Y. Lin, “Nerfool: Uncovering the vulnerability of generalizable neu- ral radiance fields against adversarial perturbations,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.06359, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Is attention all that nerf needs?

    P. Wang, X. Chen, T. Chen, S. Venugopalan, Z. Wanget al., “Is attention all that nerf needs?” inProceedings of the Inter- national Conference on Learning Representations, 2022

    2022

  96. [104]

    Rafe: Generative radiance fields restoration,

    Z. Wu, Z. Wan, J. Zhang, J. Liao, and D. Xu, “Rafe: Generative radiance fields restoration,” inProceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, 2024

    2024

  97. [105]

    Drantal-nerf: Diffusion- based restoration for anti-aliasing neural radiance field,

    G. Yang, K. Zhang, J. Fu, and D. Liu, “Drantal-nerf: Diffusion- based restoration for anti-aliasing neural radiance field,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.07461, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Photorealistic text-to-image diffusion models with 23 deep language understanding,

    C. Saharia, W. Chan, S. Saxena, L. Li, J. Whang, E. L. Denton, K. Ghasemipour, R. Gontijo Lopes, B. Karagol Ayan, T. Sali- manset al., “Photorealistic text-to-image diffusion models with 23 deep language understanding,”Advances in Neural Informa- tion Processing Systems, 2022

    2022

  99. [107]

    Hierarchical integration diffusion model for realistic image de- blurring,

    Z. Chen, Y. Zhang, D. Liu, J. Gu, L. Kong, X. Yuanet al., “Hierarchical integration diffusion model for realistic image de- blurring,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2024

    2024

  100. [108]

    Diffbir: Toward blind image restora- tion with generative diffusion prior,

    X. Lin, J. He, Z. Chen, Z. Lyu, B. Dai, F. Yu, Y. Qiao, W. Ouyang, and C. Dong, “Diffbir: Toward blind image restora- tion with generative diffusion prior,” inProceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, 2024

    2024

  101. [109]

    Alias-free generative adversarial net- works,

    T. Karras, M. Aittala, S. Laine, E. H¨ ark¨ onen, J. Hellsten, J. Lehtinen, and T. Aila, “Alias-free generative adversarial net- works,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2021

    2021

  102. [110]

    Denoising diffusion implicit models,

    J. Song, C. Meng, and S. Ermon, “Denoising diffusion implicit models,” inProceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021

    2021

  103. [111]

    Ex- ploiting diffusion prior for real-world image super-resolution,

    J. Wang, Z. Yue, S. Zhou, K. C. Chan, and C. C. Loy, “Ex- ploiting diffusion prior for real-world image super-resolution,” International Journal of Computer Vision, 2024

    2024

  104. [112]

    Towards robust blind face restoration with codebook lookup transformer,

    S. Zhou, K. Chan, C. Li, and C. C. Loy, “Towards robust blind face restoration with codebook lookup transformer,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022

    2022

  105. [113]

    Learning novel view syn- thesis from heterogeneous low-light captures,

    Q. Zheng, H. Sun, H. Xu, and F. Xu, “Learning novel view syn- thesis from heterogeneous low-light captures,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.13337, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Bright- nerf: Brightening neural radiance field with color restoration from low-light raw images,

    M. Wang, X. Huang, G. Zhou, Q. Guo, and Q. Wang, “Bright- nerf: Brightening neural radiance field with color restoration from low-light raw images,” inProceedings of the AAAI Con- ference on Artificial Intelligence, 2025

    2025

  107. [115]

    Leveraging thermal modality to enhance reconstruction in low-light condi- tions,

    J. Xu, M. Liao, R. P. Kathirvel, and V. M. Patel, “Leveraging thermal modality to enhance reconstruction in low-light condi- tions,” inProceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, 2024

    2024

  108. [116]

    Aleth- nerf: Illumination adaptive nerf with concealing field assump- tion,

    Z. Cui, L. Gu, X. Sun, X. Ma, Y. Qiao, and T. Harada, “Aleth- nerf: Illumination adaptive nerf with concealing field assump- tion,” inProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2024

    2024

  109. [117]

    Ambient-nerf: light train enhancing neural radiance fields in low-light conditions with ambient-illumination,

    P. Zhang, G. Hu, M. Chen, and M. Emam, “Ambient-nerf: light train enhancing neural radiance fields in low-light conditions with ambient-illumination,”Multimedia Tools and Applica- tions, 2024

    2024

  110. [118]

    Illumination for computer generated pictures,

    B. T. Phong, “Illumination for computer generated pictures,” inSeminal graphics: pioneering efforts that shaped the field, 1998

    1998

  111. [119]

    Real-time neural radiance caching for path tracing,

    T. M¨ uller, F. Rousselle, J. Nov´ ak, and A. Keller, “Real-time neural radiance caching for path tracing,”ACM Transactions on Graphics, 2021

    2021

  112. [120]

    Gaussian in the dark: Real-time view synthesis from inconsistent dark im- ages using gaussian splatting,

    S. Ye, Z.-H. Dong, Y. Hu, Y.-H. Wen, and Y.-J. Liu, “Gaussian in the dark: Real-time view synthesis from inconsistent dark im- ages using gaussian splatting,” inComputer Graphics Forum, 2024

    2024

  113. [121]

    Hogs: Unified near and far object reconstruction via homogeneous gaussian splatting,

    X. Liu, Z. Huang, F. Okura, and Y. Matsushita, “Hogs: Unified near and far object reconstruction via homogeneous gaussian splatting,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2025

    2025

  114. [122]

    Zip-nerf: Anti-aliased grid-based neural radiance fields,

    J. T. Barron, B. Mildenhall, D. Verbin, P. P. Srinivasan, and P. Hedman, “Zip-nerf: Anti-aliased grid-based neural radiance fields,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Confer- ence on Computer Vision, 2023

    2023

  115. [123]

    Tri-miprf: Tri-mip representation for efficient anti-aliasing neural radiance fields,

    W. Hu, Y. Wang, L. Ma, B. Yang, L. Gao, X. Liu, and Y. Ma, “Tri-miprf: Tri-mip representation for efficient anti-aliasing neural radiance fields,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF In- ternational Conference on Computer Vision, 2023

    2023

  116. [124]

    Mip- splatting: Alias-free 3d gaussian splatting,

    Z. Yu, A. Chen, B. Huang, T. Sattler, and A. Geiger, “Mip- splatting: Alias-free 3d gaussian splatting,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024

    2024

  117. [125]

    Bungeenerf: Progressive neural radiance field for extreme multi-scale scene rendering,

    Y. Xiangli, L. Xu, X. Pan, N. Zhao, A. Rao, C. Theobalt, B. Dai, and D. Lin, “Bungeenerf: Progressive neural radiance field for extreme multi-scale scene rendering,” inProceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, 2022

    2022

  118. [126]

    Pynerf: Pyramidal neural radiance fields,

    H. Turki, M. Zollh¨ ofer, C. Richardt, and D. Ramanan, “Pynerf: Pyramidal neural radiance fields,”Advances in Neural Infor- mation Processing Systems, 2023

    2023

  119. [127]

    Multiscale representation for real-time anti-aliasing neural rendering,

    D. Hu, Z. Zhang, T. Hou, T. Liu, H. Fu, and M. Gong, “Multiscale representation for real-time anti-aliasing neural rendering,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2023

    2023

  120. [128]

    Multi-scale 3d gaussian splatting for anti-aliased rendering,

    Z. Yan, W. F. Low, Y. Chen, and G. H. Lee, “Multi-scale 3d gaussian splatting for anti-aliased rendering,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024

    2024

  121. [129]

    3denhancer: Consistent multi-view diffusion for 3d enhancement,

    Y. Luo, S. Zhou, Y. Lan, X. Pan, and C. C. Loy, “3denhancer: Consistent multi-view diffusion for 3d enhancement,”Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2025

    2025

  122. [130]

    Textured-gs: Gaussian splatting with spatially defined color and opacity,

    Z. Huang and M. Gong, “Textured-gs: Gaussian splatting with spatially defined color and opacity,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.09733, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  123. [131]

    Latte3d: Large-scale amortized text- to-enhanced3d synthesis,

    K. Xie, J. Lorraine, T. Cao, J. Gao, J. Lucas, A. Torralba, S. Fidler, and X. Zeng, “Latte3d: Large-scale amortized text- to-enhanced3d synthesis,” inProceedings of the European Con- ference on Computer Vision, 2024

    2024

  124. [132]

    3dgs-enhancer: Enhancing un- bounded 3d gaussian splatting with view-consistent 2d diffusion priors,

    X. Liu, C. Zhou, and S. Huang, “3dgs-enhancer: Enhancing un- bounded 3d gaussian splatting with view-consistent 2d diffusion priors,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2024

    2024

  125. [133]

    Texture-gs: Disentangling the geometry and texture for 3d gaussian splatting editing,

    T.-X. Xu, W. Hu, Y.-K. Lai, Y. Shan, and S.-H. Zhang, “Texture-gs: Disentangling the geometry and texture for 3d gaussian splatting editing,” inProceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, 2024

    2024

  126. [134]

    Textured gaussians for enhanced 3d scene appearance modeling,

    B. Chao, H.-Y. Tseng, L. Porzi, C. Gao, T. Li, Q. Li, A. Saraf, J.-B. Huang, J. Kopf, G. Wetzsteinet al., “Textured gaussians for enhanced 3d scene appearance modeling,”Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2025

    2025

  127. [135]

    Large scale multi-view stereopsis evaluation,

    R. Jensen, A. Dahl, G. Vogiatzis, E. Tola, and H. Aanæs, “Large scale multi-view stereopsis evaluation,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2014

    2014

  128. [136]

    Tanks and temples: Benchmarking large-scale scene reconstruction,

    A. Knapitsch, J. Park, Q.-Y. Zhou, and V. Koltun, “Tanks and temples: Benchmarking large-scale scene reconstruction,”ACM Transactions on Graphics, 2017

    2017

  129. [137]

    Deep blending for free-viewpoint image-based rendering,

    P. Hedman, J. Philip, T. Price, J.-M. Frahm, G. Drettakis, and G. Brostow, “Deep blending for free-viewpoint image-based rendering,”ACM Transactions on Graphics, 2018

    2018

  130. [138]

    Local light field fusion: Practical view synthesis with prescriptive sampling guidelines,

    B. Mildenhall, P. P. Srinivasan, R. Ortiz-Cayon, N. K. Kalan- tari, R. Ramamoorthi, R. Ng, and A. Kar, “Local light field fusion: Practical view synthesis with prescriptive sampling guidelines,”ACM Transactions on Graphics, 2019

    2019

  131. [139]

    Da- vanet: Stereo deblurring with view aggregation,

    S. Zhou, J. Zhang, W. Zuo, H. Xie, J. Pan, and J. S. Ren, “Da- vanet: Stereo deblurring with view aggregation,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2019

    2019

  132. [140]

    Blendedmvs: A large-scale dataset for generalized multi-view stereo networks,

    Y. Yao, Z. Luo, S. Li, J. Zhang, Y. Ren, L. Zhou, T. Fang, and L. Quan, “Blendedmvs: A large-scale dataset for generalized multi-view stereo networks,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2020

    2020

  133. [141]

    Neural sparse voxel fields,

    L. Liu, J. Gu, K. Zaw Lin, T.-S. Chua, and C. Theobalt, “Neural sparse voxel fields,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2020

    2020

  134. [142]

    Hypernerf: a higher-dimensional representation for topologically varying neural radiance fields,

    K. Park, U. Sinha, P. Hedman, J. T. Barron, S. Bouaziz, D. B. Goldman, R. Martin-Brualla, and S. M. Seitz, “Hypernerf: a higher-dimensional representation for topologically varying neural radiance fields,”ACM Transactions on Graphics, 2021

    2021

  135. [143]

    Rtmv: A ray-traced multi-view synthetic dataset for novel view synthesis,

    J. Tremblay, M. Meshry, A. Evans, J. Kautz, A. Keller, S. Khamis, T. M¨ uller, C. Loop, N. Morrical, K. Naganoet al., “Rtmv: A ray-traced multi-view synthetic dataset for novel view synthesis,”Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision Workshops, 2022

    2022

  136. [144]

    Monocular dynamic view synthesis: A reality check,

    H. Gao, R. Li, S. Tulsiani, B. Russell, and A. Kanazawa, “Monocular dynamic view synthesis: A reality check,”Ad- vances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022

    2022

  137. [145]

    Scalable 3d captioning with pretrained models,

    T. Luo, C. Rockwell, H. Lee, and J. Johnson, “Scalable 3d captioning with pretrained models,”Advances in Neural Infor- mation Processing Systems, 2023

    2023

  138. [146]

    Blender - a 3d modelling and rendering package,

    Blender Online Community, “Blender - a 3d modelling and rendering package,” Blender Foundation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.blender. org

    2022

  139. [147]

    Scope of validity of psnr in image/video quality assessment,

    Q. Huynh-Thu and M. Ghanbari, “Scope of validity of psnr in image/video quality assessment,”Electronics letters, 2008. 24

    2008

  140. [148]

    The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a percep- tual metric,

    R. Zhang, P. Isola, A. A. Efros, E. Shechtman, and O. Wang, “The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a percep- tual metric,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2018

    2018

  141. [149]

    Imagenet clas- sification with deep convolutional neural networks,

    A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton, “Imagenet clas- sification with deep convolutional neural networks,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2012

    2012

  142. [150]

    Very deep convolutional net- works for large-scale image recognition,

    K. Simonyan and A. Zisserman, “Very deep convolutional net- works for large-scale image recognition,”Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations, 2014

    2014

  143. [151]

    Making a “com- pletely blind

    A. Mittal, R. Soundararajan, and A. C. Bovik, “Making a “com- pletely blind” image quality analyzer,”IEEE Signal processing letters, 2012

    2012

  144. [152]

    Blind image quality evaluation using perception based features,

    N. Venkatanath, D. Praneeth, M. C. Bh, S. S. Channappayya, and S. S. Medasani, “Blind image quality evaluation using perception based features,” inProceedings of the 2015 Twenty First National Conference on Communications, 2015

    2015

  145. [153]

    No-reference image quality assessment in the spatial domain,

    A. Mittal, A. K. Moorthy, and A. C. Bovik, “No-reference image quality assessment in the spatial domain,”IEEE Transactions on image processing, 2012

    2012

  146. [154]

    Blind image quality assessment via vision-language correspondence: A mul- titask learning perspective,

    W. Zhang, G. Zhai, Y. Wei, X. Yang, and K. Ma, “Blind image quality assessment via vision-language correspondence: A mul- titask learning perspective,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023

    2023

  147. [155]

    Rankiqa: Learning from rankings for no-reference image quality assess- ment,

    X. Liu, J. Van De Weijer, and A. D. Bagdanov, “Rankiqa: Learning from rankings for no-reference image quality assess- ment,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Confer- ence on Computer Vision, 2017

    2017

  148. [156]

    Metaiqa: Deep meta-learning for no-reference image quality assessment,

    H. Zhu, L. Li, J. Wu, W. Dong, and G. Shi, “Metaiqa: Deep meta-learning for no-reference image quality assessment,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2020

    2020

  149. [157]

    Musiq: Multi-scale image quality transformer,

    J. Ke, Q. Wang, Y. Wang, P. Milanfar, and F. Yang, “Musiq: Multi-scale image quality transformer,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2021

    2021

  150. [158]

    Exploring clip for assessing the look and feel of images,

    J. Wang, K. C. Chan, and C. C. Loy, “Exploring clip for assessing the look and feel of images,” inProceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, 2023

    2023

  151. [159]

    Maniqa: Multi-dimension attention network for no-reference image quality assessment,

    S. Yang, T. Wu, S. Shi, S. Lao, Y. Gong, M. Cao, J. Wang, and Y. Yang, “Maniqa: Multi-dimension attention network for no-reference image quality assessment,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022

    2022

  152. [160]

    Learning temporal coherence via self-supervision for gan- based video generation,

    M. Chu, Y. Xie, J. Mayer, L. Leal-Taix´ e, and N. Thuerey, “Learning temporal coherence via self-supervision for gan- based video generation,”ACM Transactions on Graphics, 2020

    2020

  153. [161]

    A blind image super- resolution network guided by kernel estimation and structural prior knowledge,

    J. Zhang, Y. Zhou, J. Bi, Y. Xue, W. Deng, W. He, T. Zhao, K. Sun, T. Tong, Q. Gaoet al., “A blind image super- resolution network guided by kernel estimation and structural prior knowledge,”Scientific Reports, 2024

    2024

  154. [162]

    Blind super-resolution via meta-learning and markov chain monte carlo simulation,

    J. Xia, Z. Yang, S. Li, S. Zhang, Y. Fu, D. G¨ und¨ uz, and X. Li, “Blind super-resolution via meta-learning and markov chain monte carlo simulation,”IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2024

    2024

  155. [163]

    Unsupervised blind image deblurring based on self-enhancement,

    L. Chen, X. Tian, S. Xiong, Y. Lei, and C. Ren, “Unsupervised blind image deblurring based on self-enhancement,” inProceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024

    2024

  156. [164]

    Addsr: Accelerating diffusion-based blind super- resolution with adversarial diffusion distillation,

    R. Xie, Y. Tai, C. Zhao, K. Zhang, Z. Zhang, J. Zhou, X. Ye, J. Yanget al., “Addsr: Accelerating diffusion-based blind super- resolution with adversarial diffusion distillation,” inProceed- ings of the International Conference on Learning Representa- tions, 2025

    2025

  157. [165]

    4d gaussian splatting for real-time dy- namic scene rendering,

    G. Wu, T. Yi, J. Fang, L. Xie, X. Zhang, W. Wei, W. Liu, Q. Tian, and X. Wang, “4d gaussian splatting for real-time dy- namic scene rendering,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024

    2024

  158. [166]

    Grid4d: 4d decomposed hash encoding for high-fidelity dynamic gaussian splatting,

    J. Xu, Z. Fan, J. Yang, and J. Xie, “Grid4d: 4d decomposed hash encoding for high-fidelity dynamic gaussian splatting,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2024

    2024

  159. [167]

    Sc-gs: Sparse-controlled gaussian splatting for editable dynamic scenes,

    Y.-H. Huang, Y.-T. Sun, Z. Yang, X. Lyu, Y.-P. Cao, and X. Qi, “Sc-gs: Sparse-controlled gaussian splatting for editable dynamic scenes,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024

    2024

  160. [168]

    D-nerf: Neural radiance fields for dynamic scenes,

    A. Pumarola, E. Corona, G. Pons-Moll, and F. Moreno-Noguer, “D-nerf: Neural radiance fields for dynamic scenes,” inProceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2021

    2021

  161. [169]

    Nerf-ds: Neural radiance fields for dynamic specular objects,

    Z. Yan, C. Li, and G. H. Lee, “Nerf-ds: Neural radiance fields for dynamic specular objects,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023

    2023

  162. [170]

    Snowflakenet: Point cloud completion by snowflake point deconvolution with skip-transformer,

    P. Xiang, X. Wen, Y.-S. Liu, Y.-P. Cao, P. Wan, W. Zheng, and Z. Han, “Snowflakenet: Point cloud completion by snowflake point deconvolution with skip-transformer,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2021

    2021

  163. [171]

    Endosparse: Real-time sparse view synthesis of endoscopic scenes using gaussian splatting,

    C. Li, B. Y. Feng, Y. Liu, H. Liu, C. Wang, W. Yu, and Y. Yuan, “Endosparse: Real-time sparse view synthesis of endoscopic scenes using gaussian splatting,” inInternational Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Interven- tion, 2024

    2024

  164. [172]

    Mvsplat: Efficient 3d gaussian splat- ting from sparse multi-view images,

    Y. Chen, H. Xu, C. Zheng, B. Zhuang, M. Pollefeys, A. Geiger, T.-J. Cham, and J. Cai, “Mvsplat: Efficient 3d gaussian splat- ting from sparse multi-view images,” inProceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, 2024

    2024

  165. [173]

    Dipnet: Efficiency distillation and iterative pruning for image super-resolution,

    L. Yu, X. Li, Y. Li, T. Jiang, Q. Wu, H. Fan, and S. Liu, “Dipnet: Efficiency distillation and iterative pruning for image super-resolution,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023

    2023

  166. [174]

    Lightweight real-time image super-resolution network for 4k images,

    G. Gankhuyag, K. Yoon, J. Park, H. S. Son, and K. Min, “Lightweight real-time image super-resolution network for 4k images,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023

    2023

  167. [175]

    Frr-net: a fast reparameterized residual network for low-light image enhance- ment,

    Y. Chen, G. Zhu, X. Wang, and H. Yang, “Frr-net: a fast reparameterized residual network for low-light image enhance- ment,”Signal, Image and Video Processing, 2024

    2024

  168. [176]

    Denoising point clouds with fewer learn- able parameters,

    H. Sheng and Y. Li, “Denoising point clouds with fewer learn- able parameters,”Computer-Aided Design, 2024

    2024

  169. [177]

    Geenet: robust and fast point cloud completion for ground elevation estimation towards au- tonomous vehicles,

    L. Liu, W. Yang, and B. Fei, “Geenet: robust and fast point cloud completion for ground elevation estimation towards au- tonomous vehicles,”Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 2024

    2024

  170. [178]

    Generative diffusion prior for uni- fied image restoration and enhancement,

    B. Fei, Z. Lyu, L. Pan, J. Zhang, W. Yang, T. Luo, B. Zhang, and B. Dai, “Generative diffusion prior for uni- fied image restoration and enhancement,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  171. [179]

    Dp- mambair: All-in-one image restoration via degradation-aware prompt state space model,

    Z. Liu, S. Zhou, Y. Dai, Y. Wang, Y. An, and X. Zhao, “Dp- mambair: All-in-one image restoration via degradation-aware prompt state space model,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.17732, 2025

    2025

  172. [180]

    Promptir: Prompting for all-in-one image restoration,

    V. Potlapalli, S. W. Zamir, S. H. Khan, and F. Shahbaz Khan, “Promptir: Prompting for all-in-one image restoration,”Ad- vances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023

    2023

  173. [181]

    Any image restoration with efficient automatic degradation adaptation,

    B. Ren, E. Zamfir, Y. Li, Z. Wu, D. P. Paudel, R. Timo- fte, N. Sebe, and L. Van Gool, “Any image restoration with efficient automatic degradation adaptation,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.13372, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  174. [182]

    Autodir: Automatic all- in-one image restoration with latent diffusion,

    Y. Jiang, Z. Zhang, T. Xue, and J. Gu, “Autodir: Automatic all- in-one image restoration with latent diffusion,” inProceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, 2024

    2024

  175. [183]

    Gridformer: Residual dense transformer with grid structure for image restoration in ad- verse weather conditions,

    T. Wang, K. Zhang, Z. Shao, W. Luo, B. Stenger, T. Lu, T.-K. Kim, W. Liu, and H. Li, “Gridformer: Residual dense transformer with grid structure for image restoration in ad- verse weather conditions,”International Journal of Computer Vision, 2024

    2024

  176. [184]

    Prompt-based ingredient-oriented all-in-one image restora- tion,

    H. Gao, J. Yang, Y. Zhang, N. Wang, J. Yang, and D. Dang, “Prompt-based ingredient-oriented all-in-one image restora- tion,”IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2024

    2024

  177. [185]

    Instructir: High- quality image restoration following human instructions,

    M. V. Conde, G. Geigle, and R. Timofte, “Instructir: High- quality image restoration following human instructions,” in Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, 2024

    2024

  178. [186]

    Instructre- store: Region-customized image restoration with human in- structions,

    S. Liu, J. Ma, L. Sun, X. Kong, and L. Zhang, “Instructre- store: Region-customized image restoration with human in- structions,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.24357, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  179. [187]

    Tell me what you see: Text-guided real-world image denoising,

    E. Yosef and R. Giryes, “Tell me what you see: Text-guided real-world image denoising,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.10191, 2023. 25

    2023 arXiv

  180. [188]

    Applying ar technology integrating unity3d with the vuforia sdk for oral english teaching,

    W. Huang and H. Zhang, “Applying ar technology integrating unity3d with the vuforia sdk for oral english teaching,”IEIE Transactions on Smart Processing & Computing, 2023

    2023

  181. [189]

    Neural rendering survey targeted on speed, quality, 3d reconstruction, and editing,

    C. Kwag and S. S. Hwang, “Neural rendering survey targeted on speed, quality, 3d reconstruction, and editing,”IEIE Trans- actions on Smart Processing & Computing, 2025

    2025

  182. [190]

    Ballorg: State-of-the-art image restoration using block-augmented lagrangian and low- rank gradients,

    L. Tojo, M. Devi, V. Maiket al., “Ballorg: State-of-the-art image restoration using block-augmented lagrangian and low- rank gradients,”IEIE Transactions on Smart Processing & Computing, 2023

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.