pith. sign in

arxiv: 2506.16887 · v2 · pith:6RGQWOAXnew · submitted 2025-06-20 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Winding-control mechanism of non-Hermitian systems

Yongxu Fu , Yi Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 00:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords non-Hermitian systemsconditional boundary conditionswinding numbersskin effectBrillouin zonegeneralized Brillouin zonetopologyboundary conditions
0
0 comments X

The pith

Conditional boundary conditions enable selective collapse of non-Hermitian periodic spectra to open-boundary spectra based on winding numbers.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces conditional boundary conditions to create a winding-control mechanism in non-Hermitian systems. This mechanism selectively collapses certain periodic boundary condition spectra onto their open boundary condition versions, guided by the spectra's winding numbers. It also involves reconstructing the Brillouin zone and generalized Brillouin zone together. A sympathetic reader would care because this offers a way to control the topology and boundary effects in these systems through specific choices of boundaries. The control is intuitively linked to imaginary velocities from the Fermi sea.

Core claim

By introducing conditional boundary conditions for non-Hermitian quantum systems, a winding-control mechanism is established that selectively collapses specific periodic boundary condition loop-type spectra onto their open boundary condition counterparts, guided by their winding numbers, accompanied by a composite reconstruction of the Brillouin zone and generalized Brillouin zone.

What carries the argument

Conditional boundary conditions (CBCs), which serve as transition boundaries between different non-Hermitian topologies of spectral windings, tied to residual imaginary velocity from the Fermi sea.

If this is right

  • The eigenstates exhibit nontrivial skin effects or extended behaviors due to the interplay between Brillouin zone and generalized Brillouin zone structures.
  • The control can be generalized by incorporating similarity transformations and holomorphic mappings with the boundary controls.
  • The mechanism enriches understanding of non-Hermitian physics across spectrum, topology, and bulk-boundary correspondence.
  • Specific models demonstrate the winding control numerically.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This approach could be extended to other types of boundary conditions in different non-Hermitian models to predict new topological phases.
  • Connecting the imaginary velocity concept might allow similar controls in classical wave systems or photonic structures.
  • Further exploration could test whether this control affects transport properties or response functions in these systems.

Load-bearing premise

The residual imaginary velocity from the corresponding Fermi sea directly sets up the conditional boundary conditions as the transition boundaries for different spectral winding topologies.

What would settle it

A numerical calculation in a specific non-Hermitian model where applying the conditional boundary conditions does not result in the predicted selective collapse of spectra according to their winding numbers.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.16887 by Yi Zhang, Yongxu Fu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Schematically, a worldline may wind around the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Under LP CBC, (a) the eigenstates resembling the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The spectrum and GBZ (BZ) of the model in Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The spectrum and GBZ (BZ) of the HN models [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Illustration of the vanishing of Im(¯v [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Schematic illustration of spectrum suppression in green parts under CBCs with ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The spectral collapse process from PBC to CBC spectra controlled by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. The winding-control process of a model with three PBC loops as described by Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. (a) and (b): the two joint HN chains with distinct chemical potentials [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Non-Hermitian quantum systems exhibit various interesting and inter-connected spectral, topological, and boundary-sensitive features. By introducing conditional boundary conditions (CBCs) for non-Hermitian quantum systems, we explore a winding-control mechanism that selectively collapses specific periodic boundary condition (PBC) loop-type spectra onto their open boundary condition (OBC) counterparts, guided by their specific winding numbers, together with a composite reconstruction of the Brillouin zone (BZ) and generalized Brillouin zone (GBZ). The corresponding eigenstates also manifest nontrivial skin effects or extended behaviors arising from the interplay between BZ and GBZ structures. Intuitively, the winding-control mechanism is tied to the residual imaginary velocity originating from the corresponding Fermi sea, establishing the CBCs as the transition boundaries between different non-Hermitian topology of spectral windings. Furthermore, we can generalize our control by incorporating similarity transformations and holomorphic mappings with the boundary controls. We demonstrate the winding control numerically within various models, which enriches our knowledge of non-Hermitian physics across the spectrum, topology, and bulk-boundary correspondence.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces conditional boundary conditions (CBCs) for non-Hermitian quantum systems and proposes a winding-control mechanism that selectively collapses specific PBC loop-type spectra onto their OBC counterparts, guided by winding numbers, together with a composite reconstruction of the Brillouin zone (BZ) and generalized Brillouin zone (GBZ). Eigenstates exhibit nontrivial skin effects or extended behaviors arising from the BZ-GBZ interplay. The mechanism is intuitively linked to residual imaginary velocity from the Fermi sea, which is said to establish CBCs as transition boundaries between different non-Hermitian spectral winding topologies. Generalizations via similarity transformations and holomorphic mappings are discussed, with numerical demonstrations provided in various models.

Significance. If the proposed mechanism can be placed on a firmer first-principles footing, the work would enrich the understanding of non-Hermitian bulk-boundary correspondence by offering a controllable link between winding numbers, boundary conditions, and spectral topology. The numerical demonstrations across multiple models constitute a concrete strength, illustrating the interplay between BZ and GBZ structures and the resulting skin or extended states.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and the central claim: the assertion that residual imaginary velocity from the Fermi sea directly establishes CBCs as the transition boundaries between distinct non-Hermitian winding topologies is presented without an explicit derivation or model-independent argument showing how the velocity condition enforces selective collapse exactly according to winding number. The manuscript therefore relies on numerical verification in selected models rather than a general justification, leaving the first-principles status of the winding-control mechanism unclear.
  2. [Numerical demonstrations] Numerical demonstrations section: while demonstrations are reported in various models, no error analysis, convergence tests with respect to system size, or explicit mapping from computed winding numbers to the observed CBC-induced spectral collapses is provided. This weakens the ability to assess whether the selectivity holds robustly or is an artifact of the chosen examples.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address the two major comments point by point below. Where the comments identify areas that would benefit from additional clarification or supporting analysis, we have revised the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and the central claim: the assertion that residual imaginary velocity from the Fermi sea directly establishes CBCs as the transition boundaries between distinct non-Hermitian winding topologies is presented without an explicit derivation or model-independent argument showing how the velocity condition enforces selective collapse exactly according to winding number. The manuscript therefore relies on numerical verification in selected models rather than a general justification, leaving the first-principles status of the winding-control mechanism unclear.

    Authors: The manuscript develops the winding-control mechanism through the definition of conditional boundary conditions and their action on the loop spectra, with the residual imaginary velocity introduced as an intuitive link to the Fermi-sea contribution. We agree that the abstract states this connection concisely and that a more explicit, model-independent derivation would strengthen the first-principles grounding. In the revised manuscript we add a dedicated subsection that derives the velocity condition from the non-Hermitian dispersion relation and shows how it enforces selective collapse according to the winding number, using the properties of the generalized Brillouin zone reconstruction. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Numerical demonstrations] Numerical demonstrations section: while demonstrations are reported in various models, no error analysis, convergence tests with respect to system size, or explicit mapping from computed winding numbers to the observed CBC-induced spectral collapses is provided. This weakens the ability to assess whether the selectivity holds robustly or is an artifact of the chosen examples.

    Authors: The numerical examples were selected to demonstrate the mechanism across representative non-Hermitian models, with system sizes chosen to reveal the qualitative skin-effect and spectral-collapse features. We acknowledge that explicit error analysis, finite-size convergence tests, and direct mappings from winding numbers to the observed collapses were not included. The revised manuscript adds these elements: finite-size scaling of the spectra, convergence of the computed winding numbers with system size, and explicit correspondence tables linking each winding number to the subset of loops that collapse under the conditional boundary conditions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation remains independent of its outputs

full rationale

The paper introduces CBCs as a new construct and links the winding-control mechanism intuitively to residual imaginary velocity from the Fermi sea, while treating winding numbers as given topological invariants. Claims are supported by numerical demonstrations across models and generalizations via similarity transformations and holomorphic mappings. No equations, definitions, or steps in the provided text reduce any prediction or result to the inputs by construction, nor do they rely on fitted parameters renamed as predictions, self-citation chains, or ansatzes smuggled from prior work. The central mechanism is presented as an exploratory construction rather than a self-referential fit, rendering the derivation chain self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the existence of a direct link between residual imaginary velocity of the Fermi sea and the transition role of CBCs, plus the standard assumption that winding numbers remain well-defined under the proposed boundary modifications.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Winding numbers of non-Hermitian spectra remain invariant under the introduction of conditional boundary conditions.
    Invoked in the abstract when CBCs are said to be guided by specific winding numbers.
  • ad hoc to paper The residual imaginary velocity from the Fermi sea provides the physical mechanism that makes CBCs act as topological transition boundaries.
    Stated directly in the abstract as the intuitive tie for the winding-control mechanism.
invented entities (1)
  • Conditional boundary conditions (CBCs) no independent evidence
    purpose: To selectively collapse PBC spectra onto OBC spectra according to winding number.
    New boundary prescription introduced in the abstract; no independent experimental signature is given.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5712 in / 1593 out tokens · 39548 ms · 2026-05-22T00:54:37.126584+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. $\mathbb{Z}_{2}$ Skin Channels and Effective Dynamical Quantum Phase Transitions

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Z2 skin channels in non-Hermitian systems with ATRS exhibit circulations that imply quantum revivals and scale-dependent effective DQPTs distinct from conventional ones.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 89 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    A. Yuto, G. Zongping, and U. Masahito, Advances in Physics 69, 249 (2020)

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    E. J. Bergholtz, J. C. Budich, and F. K. Kunst, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 015005 (2021)

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    T. E. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 133903 (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Leykam, K

    D. Leykam, K. Y. Bliokh, C. Huang, Y. D. Chong, and F. Nori, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 040401 (2017)

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    V. M. Martinez Alvarez, J. E. Barrios Vargas, and L. E. F. Foa Torres, Phys. Rev. B 97, 121401 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    H. Shen, B. Zhen, and L. Fu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 146402 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Z. Gong, Y. Ashida, K. Kawabata, K. Takasan, S. Hi- gashikawa, and M. Ueda, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031079 (2018)

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Kawabata, K

    K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, M. Ueda, and M. Sato, Phys. Rev. X 9, 041015 (2019)

    work page 2019

  9. [9]

    F. K. Kunst, E. Edvardsson, J. C. Budich, and E. J. Bergholtz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 026808 (2018)

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    Yao and Z

    S. Yao and Z. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 086803 (2018)

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    S. Yao, F. Song, and Z. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 136802 (2018)

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    Yokomizo and S

    K. Yokomizo and S. Murakami, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 066404 (2019)

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    Zhang, Z

    K. Zhang, Z. Yang, and C. Fang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 126402 (2020)

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    D. S. Borgnia, A. J. Kruchkov, and R.-J. Slager, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 056802 (2020)

    work page 2020

  15. [15]

    Z. Yang, K. Zhang, C. Fang, and J. Hu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 226402 (2020)

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    Okuma, K

    N. Okuma, K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, and M. Sato, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 086801 (2020)

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    H.-Y. Wang, F. Song, and Z. Wang, Phys. Rev. X 14, 021011 (2024). 6

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    C. H. Lee, L. Li, and J. Gong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 016805 (2019)

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    Kawabata, M

    K. Kawabata, M. Sato, and K. Shiozaki, Phys. Rev. B 102, 205118 (2020)

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    Okugawa, R

    R. Okugawa, R. Takahashi, and K. Yokomizo, Phys. Rev. B 102, 241202 (2020)

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    Y. Fu, J. Hu, and S. Wan, Phys. Rev. B 103, 045420 (2021)

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    Hu and E

    H. Hu and E. Zhao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 010401 (2021)

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    Y. Li, X. Ji, Y. Chen, X. Yan, and X. Yang, Phys. Rev. B 106, 195425 (2022)

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    Fu and Y

    Y. Fu and Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 110, L121401 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    X. Ji, H. Geng, N. Akhtar, and X. Yang, Phys. Rev. B 111, 195419 (2025)

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    F. Song, S. Yao, and Z. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 170401 (2019)

    work page 2019

  27. [27]

    McDonald, R

    A. McDonald, R. Hanai, and A. A. Clerk, Phys. Rev. B 105, 064302 (2022)

    work page 2022

  28. [28]

    Altland, M

    A. Altland, M. Fleischhauer, and S. Diehl, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021037 (2021)

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    G´ omez-Le´ on, T

    A. G´ omez-Le´ on, T. Ramos, A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, and D. Porras, Phys. Rev. A 106, L011501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Li, H.-R

    B. Li, H.-R. Wang, F. Song, and Z. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 109, L201121 (2024)

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    A. Guo, G. J. Salamo, D. Duchesne, R. Morandotti, M. Volatier-Ravat, V. Aimez, G. A. Siviloglou, and D. N. Christodoulides, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 093902 (2009)

    work page 2009

  32. [32]

    Chen, S ¸

    W. Chen, S ¸. Kaya ¨Ozdemir, G. Zhao, J. Wiersig, and L. Yang, Nature 548, 192 (2017)

    work page 2017

  33. [33]

    L. Xiao, K. Wang, X. Zhan, Z. Bian, K. Kawabata, M. Ueda, W. Yi, and P. Xue, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 230401 (2019)

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    L. Xiao, T. Deng, K. Wang, G. Zhu, Z. Wang, W. Yi, and P. Xue, Nature Physics 16, 761 (2020)

    work page 2020

  35. [35]

    L. Xiao, T. Deng, K. Wang, Z. Wang, W. Yi, and P. Xue, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 230402 (2021)

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    Xiao, W.-T

    L. Xiao, W.-T. Xue, F. Song, Y.-M. Hu, W. Yi, Z. Wang, and P. Xue, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 070801 (2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    Ezawa, Phys

    M. Ezawa, Phys. Rev. B 99, 121411 (2019)

    work page 2019

  38. [38]

    Ezawa, Phys

    M. Ezawa, Phys. Rev. B 100, 081401 (2019)

    work page 2019

  39. [39]

    Hofmann, T

    T. Hofmann, T. Helbig, F. Schindler, N. Salgo, M. Brzezi´ nska, M. Greiter, T. Kiessling, D. Wolf, A. Voll- hardt, A. Kabaˇ si, C. H. Lee, A. Biluˇ si´ c, R. Thomale, and T. Neupert, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023265 (2020)

    work page 2020

  40. [40]

    Helbig, T

    T. Helbig, T. Hofmann, S. Imhof, M. Abdelghany, T. Kiessling, L. W. Molenkamp, C. H. Lee, A. Szameit, M. Greiter, and R. Thomale, Nature Physics 16, 747 (2020)

    work page 2020

  41. [41]

    L. Li, C. H. Lee, and J. Gong, Communications Physics 4, 42 (2021)

    work page 2021

  42. [42]

    Brandenbourger, X

    M. Brandenbourger, X. Locsin, E. Lerner, and C. Coulais, Nature Communications 10, 4608 (2019)

    work page 2019

  43. [43]

    Ghatak, M

    A. Ghatak, M. Brandenbourger, J. van Wezel, and C. Coulais, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences 117, 29561 (2020)

    work page 2020

  44. [44]

    Y. Chen, X. Li, C. Scheibner, V. Vitelli, and G. Huang, Nature Communications 12, 5935 (2021)

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    W. Wang, X. Wang, and G. Ma, Nature 608, 50 (2022)

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    W. Wang, M. Hu, X. Wang, G. Ma, and K. Ding, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 207201 (2023)

    work page 2023

  47. [47]

    Li, L.-W

    Z. Li, L.-W. Wang, X. Wang, Z.-K. Lin, G. Ma, and J.-H. Jiang, Nature Communications 15, 6544 (2024)

    work page 2024

  48. [48]

    Hamazaki, K

    R. Hamazaki, K. Kawabata, and M. Ueda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 090603 (2019)

    work page 2019

  49. [49]

    Tang, L.-F

    L.-Z. Tang, L.-F. Zhang, G.-Q. Zhang, and D.-W. Zhang, Phys. Rev. A 101, 063612 (2020)

    work page 2020

  50. [50]

    Schiffer, X.-J

    S. Schiffer, X.-J. Liu, H. Hu, and J. Wang, Phys. Rev. A 103, L011302 (2021)

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    Y. Liu, Q. Zhou, and S. Chen, Phys. Rev. B 104, 024201 (2021)

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    Kawabata and S

    K. Kawabata and S. Ryu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 166801 (2021)

    work page 2021

  53. [53]

    Hu, Y.-X

    S.-X. Hu, Y.-X. Fu, and Y. Zhang, Residue imagi- nary velocity induces many-body delocalization (2024), arXiv:2407.15954 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  54. [54]

    E. Lee, H. Lee, and B.-J. Yang, Phys. Rev. B101, 121109 (2020)

    work page 2020

  55. [55]

    S. Mu, C. H. Lee, L. Li, and J. Gong, Phys. Rev. B 102, 081115 (2020)

    work page 2020

  56. [56]

    Chang, J.-S

    P.-Y. Chang, J.-S. You, X. Wen, and S. Ryu, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033069 (2020)

    work page 2020

  57. [57]

    Shen and C

    R. Shen and C. H. Lee, Communications Physics 5, 238 (2022)

    work page 2022

  58. [58]

    Zhang, M

    S.-B. Zhang, M. M. Denner, T. c. v. Bzduˇ sek, M. A. Sen- tef, and T. Neupert, Phys. Rev. B 106, L121102 (2022)

    work page 2022

  59. [59]

    Matsumoto, K

    N. Matsumoto, K. Kawabata, Y. Ashida, S. Furukawa, and M. Ueda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 260601 (2020)

    work page 2020

  60. [60]

    Alsallom, L

    F. Alsallom, L. Herviou, O. V. Yazyev, and M. Brzezi´ nska, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 033122 (2022)

    work page 2022

  61. [61]

    Kawabata, T

    K. Kawabata, T. Numasawa, and S. Ryu, Phys. Rev. X 13, 021007 (2023)

    work page 2023

  62. [62]

    T. Haga, M. Nakagawa, R. Hamazaki, and M. Ueda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 070402 (2021)

    work page 2021

  63. [63]

    Yang, Q.-D

    F. Yang, Q.-D. Jiang, and E. J. Bergholtz, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 023160 (2022)

    work page 2022

  64. [64]

    S. Guo, C. Dong, F. Zhang, J. Hu, and Z. Yang, Phys. Rev. A 106, L061302 (2022)

    work page 2022

  65. [65]

    Li and S

    H. Li and S. Wan, Phys. Rev. B 106, L241112 (2022)

    work page 2022

  66. [66]

    Shimomura and M

    K. Shimomura and M. Sato, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 136502 (2024)

    work page 2024

  67. [67]

    R. Shen, F. Qin, J.-Y. Desaules, Z. Papi´ c, and C. H. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 216601 (2024)

    work page 2024

  68. [68]

    Gliozzi, G

    J. Gliozzi, G. De Tomasi, and T. L. Hughes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 136503 (2024)

    work page 2024

  69. [69]

    Y.-M. Hu, Z. Wang, B. Lian, and Z. Wang, Many-body non-hermitian skin effect with exact steady states in dis- sipative lattice gauge theory (2025), arXiv:2502.03534 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  70. [70]

    Gliozzi, F

    J. Gliozzi, F. Balducci, T. L. Hughes, and G. D. Tomasi, Non-hermitian multipole skin effects challenge localiza- tion (2025), arXiv:2504.10580 [cond-mat.dis-nn]

    work page arXiv 2025

  71. [71]

    Guo, C.-H

    C.-X. Guo, C.-H. Liu, X.-M. Zhao, Y. Liu, and S. Chen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 116801 (2021)

    work page 2021

  72. [72]

    Molignini, O

    P. Molignini, O. Arandes, and E. J. Bergholtz, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 033058 (2023)

    work page 2023

  73. [73]

    C.-X. Guo, X. Wang, H. Hu, and S. Chen, Phys. Rev. B 107, 134121 (2023)

    work page 2023

  74. [74]

    Fu and Y

    Y. Fu and Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 108, 205423 (2023)

    work page 2023

  75. [75]

    Li, H.-R

    B. Li, H.-R. Wang, F. Song, and Z. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 108, L161409 (2023)

    work page 2023

  76. [76]

    The symbol with a hat, ˆH, explicitly denotes the Hamiltonian operator in the second-quantized formalism

    Throughout the paper, we adopt a unified notation convention for the Hamiltonians. The symbol with a hat, ˆH, explicitly denotes the Hamiltonian operator in the second-quantized formalism. In contrast, the sym- bol without a hat, H, refers to the Hamiltonian matrix under OBCs, with boundary hoppings excluded. Mean- while, H(z) represents the so-called non...

    work page

  77. [77]

    This filling convention can be generalized to filled (empty) states with Re( eiθϵ) < µ [Re(eiθϵ) > µ ] via a mapping ˆH ′ = ˆHe iθ − µ ˆN, where ˆN is the fermion num- ber operator, e.g., the Fermi sea Im( ϵ) > 0 in terms of long-time steady-state dynamics [53]

    work page

  78. [78]

    Multiple bands, if exist, need to be summered over

    work page

  79. [79]

    S.-X. Hu, Y. Fu, and Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B108, 245114 (2023)

    work page 2023

  80. [80]

    See the supplementary materials for further details

    work page

Showing first 80 references.