Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

RAGentA: Multi-Agent Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Attributed Question Answering

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.16988 v2 pith:WLB5KUVG submitted 2025-06-20 cs.IR

RAGentA: Multi-Agent Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Attributed Question Answering

classification cs.IR
keywords ragentamulti-agentanswersattributedgenerationquestionretrievalanswer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We present RAGentA, a multi-agent retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) framework for attributed question answering (QA) with large language models (LLMs). With the goal of trustworthy answer generation, RAGentA focuses on optimizing answer correctness, defined by coverage and relevance to the question and faithfulness, which measures the extent to which answers are grounded in retrieved documents. RAGentA uses a multi-agent architecture that iteratively filters retrieved documents, generates attributed answers with in-line citations, and verifies completeness through dynamic refinement. Central to the framework is a hybrid retrieval strategy that combines sparse and dense methods, improving Recall@20 by 12.5% compared to the best single retrieval model, resulting in more correct and well-supported answers. Evaluated on a synthetic QA dataset derived from the FineWeb index, RAGentA outperforms standard RAG baselines, achieving gains of 1.09% in correctness and 10.72% in faithfulness. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of our multi-agent RAG architecture and hybrid retrieval strategy in advancing trustworthy QA with LLMs.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. When Latent Agents Lie: KV-Cache Integrity in Multi-Agent LLM Collaboration

    cs.MA 2026-06 conditional novelty 7.0

    KV-cache sharing boosts multi-agent QA performance but enables undetectable tampering; HMAC manifests binding agent, session, and payload reliably detect changes.

  2. Query Symbolically or Retrieve Semantically? A Dataset and Method for Semi-Structured Question Answering

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DualGraph combines semantic textual KGs with symbolic KGs for semi-structured QA and introduces the SpecsQA benchmark, outperforming baselines on both open and specification questions.

  3. Claim2Source at CheckThat! 2026: Improving Multilingual Scientific Claim-Source Retrieval with Verification-based Re-Ranking

    cs.IR 2026-07 accept novelty 4.0

    A three-stage pipeline with bilingual claims, metadata-enhanced sources, and verification-based LLM re-ranking reaches 0.7628 average MRR@5 and ranks first on CheckThat! 2026 Task 1.