Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Scattering of the 2D modified Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that small, spatially localized solutions of the 2D modified Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation scatter to linear waves at large times.

desk verdict First scattering result for 2D mZK, with a coherent bootstrap but a load-bearing singular-symbol lemma that is only sketched and a skipped short-time interval; deserves refereeing, not a desk reject. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.17179 v1 pith:XDOKJ655 submitted 2025-06-20 math.AP

Philippe Anjolras This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35Q5335B40
keywords modifiedZakharov-Kuznetsovequationscatteringspace-timeresonancesglobalwell-posednessdispersiveestimatesweightednormsAirykernelsmalldata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves a nonlinear scattering result for the two-dimensional modified Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation, the cubic dispersive model that describes ion-acoustic waves in a magnetized plasma and extends the modified Korteweg-de Vries equation to two dimensions. The central theorem states that initial data small in $H^3$ and with finite weighted $L^2$ norm $\|(|x|+|y|)u_0\|_{L^2}$ yield a global solution $u(t)$ with $\|u(t)\|_{H^3}\le C\epsilon_0$ for all $t\ge0$, and the profile $f(t)=e^{tL}u(t)$ converges in $H^2$ as $t\to\infty$, with $\|f(\infty)-f(0)\|_{H^2}\lesssim \epsilon^3$. A sympathetic reader should care because this is the first scattering result for this equation: it says that small, well-localized waves cease to interact at large times and simply disperse linearly, and the explicit rate of approach to the asymptotic profile is a quantitative statement of that decay. The proof is carried out through the space-time resonance method, isolating the interaction phase and its stationary set and converting resonant terms into more decaying ones by integration by parts.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Duhamel formula for the Fourier transform of the profile, written with the cubic phase $\varphi(\xi,\eta,\sigma)$ and symbol $\xi_a+\xi_b$. The decisive mechanism is the singular decomposition of Lemma 6.4: the product $(\xi_a+\xi_b)\partial_{\xi_a}\varphi$ is expressed as a combination of $\partial_{\eta_a}\varphi$, $\partial_{\sigma_a}\varphi$, $\partial_{\eta_b}\varphi$, $\partial_{\sigma_b}\varphi$, and $\varphi$ itself, with coefficients having finite bi-parameter multiplier norm and the only singularity being a factor $1/|\omega_a|$ that appears only near the space-time resonant set (where the phase and its frequency derivatives vanish together). With that identity, an integration by parts in time or in the frequencies $\eta,\sigma$ turns the leading cubic term into quartic terms or boundary terms, and time-dependent cutoffs $\chi(s)=\chi_0(s^{1/4}|\omega_a|/|\omega_b|)$ separate the singular region, where the cancellation of the symbol is exploited, from the rest, where the singular identity applies. The dispersive backbone is the Airy-kernel estimate $|K_t(x_a,x_b)|\lesssim t^{-2/3}\langle t^{-1/3}x_a\rangle^{-1/4}\langle t^{-1/3}x_b\rangle^{-1/4}$, which through weak Lebesgue spaces yields the $L^\infty$ decay used to close every estimate.

What would settle it

Check the identity (6.2) at a point approaching the singular set with $\rho_a=0$, $\rho_b=-\eta_b=-\sigma_b\neq0$, and verify that the multiplier norms used in (6.6a) obey the claimed $s^{-1/2}$ decay; if the symbols have derivatives that grow faster as $|\omega_a|/|\omega_b|\to0$, the integration-by-parts scheme collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Theorem 1.1 is the central claim: there are constants $\epsilon_0, C>0$ such that every initial datum $u_0$ with $\|u_0\|_{H^3} + \|(|x|+|y|)u_0\|_{L^2} \le \epsilon_0$ gives a global solution $u(t)$ of (1.1) satisfying $\|u(t)\|_{H^3}\le C\epsilon_0$ for all $t\ge0$, and the profile $f(t)=e^{tL}u(t)$ converges in $H^2$ as $t\to\infty$. The equation being studied is $\partial_t u + \partial_x(\Delta u + u^3)=0$ in two dimensions, equivalently $\partial_t v + \partial_{x_a}^3 v + \partial_{x_b}^3 v + (\partial_{x_a}+\partial_{x_b})(v^3)=0$ after the change of variables, with linear operator $L = \partial_{x_a}^3+\partial_{x_b}^3$. Scattering here means the nonlinear evolution is asymptotically linear: $u(t)$ approaches $e^{-tL}f(\infty)$, and the paper records the explicit closeness $\|f(\infty)-f(0)\|_{H^2}\lesssim \epsilon^3$.

Load-bearing premise

The proof of the weighted estimate rests on Lemma 6.4, the claim that the symbol $(\xi_a+\xi_b)\partial_{\xi_a}\varphi$ can be decomposed with coefficients of finite multiplier norm whose only singularity is a $1/|\omega_a|$ factor localized at the space-time resonant set; the lemma's proof is sketched through differential geometry, local inversion, and an angular partition of unity, so if that decomposition, or the $s^{-1/2}$ and $s^{1/4}$ bounds for the cutoffs in Subsection 6.3, fails, the integration-by-parts scheme collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every initial datum of size at most $\epsilon_0$, the solution is global, stays bounded in $H^3$ by $C\epsilon_0$, and the profile has a limit $f(\infty)$ in $H^2$; hence the scattering map for small localized data is well defined.
  • The nonlinear evolution is asymptotically linear: $u(t)$ is approximated by $e^{-tL}f(\infty)$ as $t\to\infty$, so the cubic nonlinearity has no lasting effect on small, localized waves.
  • The result holds symmetrically for $t\to-\infty$, so scattering occurs in both time directions with the same constants.
  • The $H^3$ condition is stated by the author as sub-optimal; the natural energy space $H^1$ with $L^2$ scattering is not excluded and would match the critical scaling $s_c=0$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: a numerical simulation with small, compactly supported data could test the claimed asymptotics by checking that $\|f(t)-f(s)\|_{H^2}\to0$ as $t>s\to\infty$; the paper's decay estimate for $\partial_t f$ predicts a rate of order $t^{-2/9+\delta}$.
  • Editorial inference: the method's template, singular symbol decomposition plus time-dependent cutoffs, appears transferable to other cubic dispersive equations in two dimensions whose interaction symbol vanishes on the space-time resonant set; the main new input would be an analogue of Lemma 6.4.
  • Editorial inference: if the $H^3$ assumption can be relaxed to the energy space $H^1$, scattering in $L^2$ would likely follow from the same weighted-estimate scheme and would place the result at the critical scaling index $s_c=0$.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proves a small-data scattering result for the two-dimensional modified Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation ∂tu + ∂x(Δu + u^3) = 0. The main theorem states that for initial data small in H^3 ∩ L^2 weighted by |x|+|y|, the global solution remains bounded in H^3 and the associated profile function converges in H^2 as t→∞. The proof uses the method of space-time resonances: a bootstrap of an a priori estimate that combines an H^3 energy estimate with a weighted L^2 estimate for the profile. The weighted estimate is obtained from the Duhamel formula after a decomposition of the symbol (ξ_a+ξ_b)∂_{ξ_a}φ, with a singular 1/|ω_a| factor localized near the space-time resonant set, followed by repeated integration by parts in time and frequency. The paper is organized as Sections 2–6, with kernel estimates, multilinear paraproduct estimates, the bootstrap proposition, the energy estimate, and the weighted estimate.

Significance. If the result is correct, it would be the first scattering result for the 2D modified Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation, and the proof would be a useful application of the space-time resonance method to a cubic dispersive equation with a degenerate non-resonant structure. The overall bootstrap structure is coherent, the use of Coifman-Meyer and Muscalu-Pipher-Tao-Thiele multilinear estimates is appropriate, and the paper is self-contained apart from standard tools. The main technical novelty is the singular symbol decomposition in Lemma 6.4 and its use in the weighted estimate; this is also the part that requires the most scrutiny. The proof does not appear to be circular: the a priori estimates are of bootstrap type and no constant is fitted to the data.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2, Lemma 2.1] The proof of Lemma 2.1 asserts that if two factors lie respectively in L^{p_a}_w and L^{p_b}_w, then their product lies in L^p_w for every p ≥ max(p_a,p_b). This is not a valid product rule: in general L^{p_1}_w · L^{p_2}_w ⊂ L^r_w with 1/r = 1/p_1 + 1/p_2, and the endpoint p = max(p_1,p_2) is false. For example, the product ⟨x⟩^{-1/4}⟨y⟩^{-1/4} is not in L^4_w. Since Lemma 4.2 invokes Lemma 2.1 with p = 2/ε at the endpoint β_a = 1/2−ε, the stated dispersive decay rates for |∂_{x_a}|^{1/2−ε} and |∂_{x_b}|^{1/2−ε} are not justified as written. A corrected lemma using strong L^p estimates for p > max(p_a,p_b) or a Lorentz-space product rule is needed, and the resulting decay exponents in Lemma 4.2 must be rechecked.
  2. [Section 4.3, proof of Theorem 1.1] The proof of Theorem 1.1 begins with the assertion that the hypothesis controls ∥u∥_{X,1}. However, Proposition 4.1 is a statement for solutions on [1,T] with data at t=1, while the theorem assumes data at t=0. The displayed bound ∥x_a f(1)∥_{L^2} ≤ ∥3∂_{x_a}^2 e^{-L}u(1)∥_{L^2} + ∥e^{-L}(x_a u(1))∥_{L^2} only reduces the problem to a weighted bound on the nonlinear solution u(1); this weighted bound on [0,1] is not proved, and Remark 1.2 explicitly states that this issue is avoided. A local-in-time weighted estimate, or a modified theorem statement starting at t=1, is required for the theorem as stated.
  3. [Section 6.1, Lemma 6.4] The proof of Lemma 6.4 is a sketch at the load-bearing step. In the ρ_a=0 case the text invokes 'arguments of differential geometry and local inversion' to derive an identity involving φ and ∂_{η_b}φ, ∂_{σ_b}φ, and then combines the three singular solutions (1,1,2/x), (1,−1,2/y), (−1,1,2/z) by an unspecified 'angular partition of unity' to localize the singularity at η_a=σ_a=ρ_a=0. It is not demonstrated that the resulting coefficients m_i have finite MPTT norm after globalization, nor that differentiating the 1/|ω_a| factors does not produce worse singularities. Since this decomposition is the foundation of the integration-by-parts scheme in Section 6.3, a complete proof of Lemma 6.4 is needed.
  4. [Section 6.3, bounds near singularities] The weighted estimate Proposition 6.1 relies on several asserted MPTT bounds for time-dependent symbols, for example ∥|ω_b|^{-2}∂_{ξ_a}φ χ(s)∥_{MPTT} ≲ s^{-1/2}, ∥|ω_a|^{-1}ω f m̃ eμ eχ(s)∥_{MPTT} ≲ s^{1/4}, and the analogous bounds used in (6.9a) and (6.10a). These bounds are stated without proof, and the s^{1/4} growth is exactly what makes integrals such as ∫ s^{1/4}∥u∥^2_{L∞}∥u∥_{L2} ds converge. If differentiating the cutoff χ(s,ξ,η,σ) = χ_0(s^{1/4}|ω_a|/|ω_b|) produces s^{1/2} growth or worse, the estimates (6.6a) and (6.8a) fail to close. The paper should provide a verification of these symbol bounds and of the fact that the angular partition of unity keeps all derivatives under control.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 3, Theorem 3.3] In the trilinear case of Theorem 3.3, the final display states ∥Tm∥_{Lp×Lq×Lr→Lq}, but the target space should be L^s as in the preceding line.
  2. [Section 6.2, Lemma 6.5] In the boundary term (6.4c), the integration element dηdσds includes an extraneous ds after the time integration by parts; the boundary term at s=1 should be dηdσ only.
  3. [Section 6.1] The label 'Définition 6.2' is in French; it should be 'Definition 6.2' for consistency with the rest of the text.
  4. [Section 4.2, Lemma 4.2] In the first dispersive estimate the choice p = 2/(3ε) is said to be larger than 4 for ε small, but the later choices p = 2/ε are endpoint choices for the half-derivative kernel estimates; after Lemma 2.1 is corrected, the permissible range for p should be restated explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the scattering theorem is derived from a self-contained bootstrap of energy, dispersive, and weighted estimates; the only self-citation is unrelated and not load-bearing.

full rationale

The proof chain is self-contained. Theorem 1.1 is obtained from the a priori estimate (Proposition 4.1) together with the dispersive decay of Lemma 4.2 and the time-integrability of Lemma 4.3; Proposition 4.1 is in turn the sum of the H^3 energy estimate (Section 5) and the weighted estimate (Proposition 6.1). The weighted estimate is proved from the Duhamel formula, the algebraic singular decomposition of Lemma 6.4, generic multilinear estimates of Section 6.2, and time-dependent frequency cutoffs in Section 6.3; all constants are universal and none are fitted to the solution or to the claimed conclusion. The quantity being estimated, ||u||_X,T, appears on both sides of Proposition 4.1, but that is the standard bootstrap structure of a priori estimates, not a definitional reduction: the right-hand side is controlled by powers of the same norm and is closed by smallness of the initial data. The only self-citation, reference [2], appears in an introductory list of past applications of the space-time resonance method to scattering problems and is not used to justify any lemma or to exclude any alternative. The sketchiness of Lemma 6.4 and the verification of the MPTT symbol bounds in Section 6.3 are potential correctness gaps, but they are not instances of circularity: the argument does not assume what it proves, nor does it rename a fitted input as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The proof rests on standard harmonic analysis (Coifman-Meyer, Muscalu-Pipher-Tao-Thiele, Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev, Kato-Ponce), standard Airy kernel decay estimates, and the unstated assumption that the X-norm smallness is preserved from t=0 to t=1. No free parameters are fitted to data and no new entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Coifman-Meyer and Muscalu-Pipher-Tao-Thiele multilinear multiplier theorems (Theorems 3.2, 3.3)
    Used throughout Section 6 to bound the multilinear paraproducts after integration by parts; quoted from [8] and [44].
  • standard math Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality in weak Lebesgue spaces (Theorem 2.2)
    Used in Lemma 4.2 to convolve the linear kernel K_t with the profile f(t) and obtain L^infinity decay.
  • standard math Airy kernel decay |k_t(x)| <~ t^{-1/3} <t^{-1/3}x>^{-1/4} and fractional derivative versions (Section 2)
    Provides the dispersive decay rates used in every time integrability argument; cited from [41], Proposition 1.6.
  • standard math Kato-Ponce commutator estimate ([35])
    Used in Section 5 to bound the commutator term II in the H^3 energy estimate.
  • domain assumption Local well-posedness on [0,1] preserves a small X-norm at t=1
    Theorem 1.1 states data at t=0, but the proof uses ||u||_{X,1} as its small parameter and Remark 1.2 explicitly defers the short-time propagation of the weighted norm to standard local well-posedness arguments, which are not carried out.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Scattering of the 2D modified Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XDOKJ655

@misc{pith2026250617179,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Scattering of the 2D modified Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XDOKJ655}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.17179}
}
abstract

We study the modified Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation in dimension $2$ : \[ \partial_t u + \partial_x \left( \Delta u + u^3 \right) = 0 \] where $u : (t, (x, y)) \in \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R}^2 \mapsto u(t, x, y) \in \mathbb{R}$ and $\Delta = \partial_x^2 + \partial_y^2$ is the full Laplacian. We prove that solutions for small and localized initial data scatter for large time. Our proof relies on the method of space-time resonances.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Global well-posedness and scattering for the 2D modified Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation

    math.AP 2025-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Global well-posedness and scattering for the 2D modified Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation at a new critical regularity, achieved with an anisotropic two-parameter Sobolev space.

  2. Existence of wave operators for Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation in two space dimensions

    math.AP 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The paper proves the existence of wave operators for the two-dimensional Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation for small final data.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Alazard and J.-M

    T. Alazard and J.-M. Delort, Global solutions and asymptotic behavior for two dimensional gravity water waves,Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4), 48, No. 5 (2015), pp. 1149–1238

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    Anjolras, Stability of the constant states in the augmented Born-Infeld system, J

    P. Anjolras, Stability of the constant states in the augmented Born-Infeld system, J. Hyperbolic Differ. Equ., 21, No. 4 (2024), pp. 845–948

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Bhattacharya, L

    D. Bhattacharya, L. G. Farah, S. Roudenko, Global well-posedness for low regularity data in the 2d modified Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation,J. Differential Equations, 268, No. 12 (2020), pp. 7962–7997

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    H. A. Biagioni and F. Linares, Well-posedness results for the modified Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation, Nonlinear equations: Methods, Models and Applications. Progress in Nonlinear Dif- ferential Equations and their applications, 54 (2003), Birkhäuser, Basel, pp. 181-189

    work page 2003

  5. [5]

    Bozgan and T.-E

    F. Bozgan and T.-E. Ghoul and N. Masmoudi and K. Yang, Blow-Up Dynamics for theL2 critical case of the 2D Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation,arXiv:2406.06568 [math.AP]

    arXiv

  6. [6]

    Chen and Y

    G. Chen and Y. Lan and X. Yuan, On the near soliton dynamics for the 2D cubic Zakharov- Kuznetsov equations,arXiv:2407.00300 [math.AP]

    arXiv

  7. [7]

    Chiron, Error bounds for the (KdV)/(KP-I) and (gKdV)/(gKP-I) asymptotic regime for nonlinear Schrödinger type equations, Ann

    D. Chiron, Error bounds for the (KdV)/(KP-I) and (gKdV)/(gKP-I) asymptotic regime for nonlinear Schrödinger type equations, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré C Anal. Non Linéaire31 (2014), no. 6, pp. 1175–1230

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    R. R. Coifman and Y. Meyer,Au delà des opérateurs pseudo-différentiels, Astérisque, 57 (1978), Société Mathématique de France (SMF), Paris

    work page 1978

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    Deng and A

    Y. Deng and A. D. Ionescu and B. Pausader, The Euler-Maxwell system for electrons: global solutions in 2D,Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 225, No. 2 (2017), pp. 771–871

    2017

  2. [10]

    A. V. Faminskii, The Cauchy problem for the Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation,Differ. Equations, 31, No. 6 (1995), pp. 1002–1012. 21

    1995

  3. [11]

    L. G. Farah and F. Linares and A. Pastor, A note on the 2D generalized Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation: local, global, and scattering results,J. Differ. Equations, 253, No. 8 (2012), pp. 2558– 2571

    2012

  4. [12]

    Germain and N

    P. Germain and N. Masmoudi, Global existence for the Euler-Maxwell system,Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4), 47, No. 3 (2014), pp. 469–503

    2014

  5. [13]

    Germain and N

    P. Germain and N. Masmoudi and J. Shatah, Global solutions for 3D quadratic Schrödinger equations, Int. Math. Res. Not., 3 (2009), pp. 414–432

    2009

  6. [14]

    Germain and N

    P. Germain and N. Masmoudi and J. Shatah, Global solutions for 2D quadratic Schrödinger equations, J. Math. Pures Appl. (9), 97, No. 5 (2012), pp. 505–543

    2012

  7. [15]

    Germain and N

    P. Germain and N. Masmoudi and J. Shatah, Global solutions for the gravity water waves equation in dimension 3,Ann. Math. (2), 175 (2012), pp. 691–754

    2012

  8. [16]

    Germain and N

    P. Germain and N. Masmoudi and J. Shatah, Global existence for capillary water waves, Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 68, No. 4 (2015), pp. 625–687

    2015

  9. [17]

    Germain and F

    P. Germain and F. Pusateri and F. Rousset, Asymptotic stability of solitons for mKdV,Adv. Math., 299 (2016), pp. 272–330

    2016

  10. [18]

    Grünrock and S

    A. Grünrock and S. Herr, The Fourier restriction norm method for the Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 34, No. 5 (2014), pp. 2061–2068

    2014

  11. [19]

    Grünrock, A remark on the modified Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation in three space dimen- sions, Math

    A. Grünrock, A remark on the modified Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation in three space dimen- sions, Math. Res. Lett., 21 (2014), pp. 127–131

    2014

  12. [20]

    Grünrock, On the generalized Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation at critical regularity, arXiv:1509.09146 [math.AP]

    A. Grünrock, On the generalized Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation at critical regularity, arXiv:1509.09146 [math.AP]

    arXiv

  13. [21]

    Guo and A

    Y. Guo and A. D. Ionescu and B. Pausader, Global solutions of certain plasma fluid models in three-dimension, J. Math. Phys., 55, No. 12 (2014)

    2014

  14. [22]

    Guo and A

    Y. Guo and A. D. Ionescu and B. Pausader, Global solutions of the Euler-Maxwell two-fluid system in 3D,Ann. Math. (2), 183, No. 2 (2016), pp. 377-498

    2016

  15. [23]

    Guo and B

    Y. Guo and B. Pausader, Global smooth ion dynamics in the Euler-Poisson system,Commun. Math. Phys., 303, No. 1 (2011), pp. 89–125

    2011

  16. [24]

    Gustafson and K

    S. Gustafson and K. Nakanishi and T.-P. Tsai, Global dispersive solutions for the Gross- Pitaevskiiequationintwoandthreedimensions, Ann. Henri Poincaré, 8, No.7(2007), pp.1303– 1331

    2007

  17. [25]

    Gustafson and K

    S. Gustafson and K. Nakanishi and T.-P. Tsai, Scattering theory for the Gross-Pitaevskii equation in three dimensions,Commun. Contemp. Math., 11, No. 4 (2009), pp. 657–707

    2009

  18. [26]

    B. H. Harrop-Griffiths, Long time behavior of solutions to the mKdV,Comm. Partial Differ- ential Equations, 41, No. 2 (2016), pp. 282–317

    2016

  19. [27]

    Hayashi and P

    N. Hayashi and P. I. Naumkin, Large time behavior of solutions for the modified Korteweg-de Vries equation,Internat. Math. Res. Notices, No. 8 (1999), pp. 395–418. 22

    1999

  20. [28]

    Hayashi and P

    N. Hayashi and P. I. Naumkin, On the modified Korteweg-de Vries equation,Math. Phys. Anal. Geom., 4, No. 3 (2001), pp. 197–227

    2001

  21. [29]

    Herr and S

    S. Herr and S. Kinoshita, Subcritical well-posedness results for the Zakharov-Kuznetsov equa- tion in dimension three and higher,Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble), 73, No. 3 (2023), pp. 1203– 1267

    2023

  22. [30]

    J. K. Hunter and M. Ifrim and D. Tataru, Two dimensional water waves in holomorphic coordinates, Commun. Math. Phys., 346, No. 2 (2016), pp. 483–552

    2016

  23. [31]

    Ifrim and D

    M. Ifrim and D. Tataru, Two dimensional water waves in holomorphic coordinates. II: Global solutions, Bull. Soc. Math. Fr., 144, No. 2 (2016), pp. 369–394

    2016

  24. [32]

    Ifrim and D

    M. Ifrim and D. Tataru, The global well-posedness conjecture for 1D cubic dispersive equations, arXiv:2311.15076 [math.AP]

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    A. D. Ionescu and B. Pausader, Global solutions of quasilinear systems of Klein-Gordon equa- tions in 3D,J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS), 16, No. 11 (2014), pp. 2355–2431

    2014

  26. [34]

    A. D. Ionescu and F. Pusateri, Global solutions for the gravity water waves system in 2d, Invent. Math., 199, No. 3 (2015), pp. 653–804

    2015

  27. [35]

    Kato and G

    T. Kato and G. Ponce, Commutator estimates and the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 41, No. 7 (1988), pp. 891–907

    1988

  28. [36]

    Kinoshita, Global well-posedness for the Cauchy problem of the Zakharov-Kuznetsov equa- tion in 2D,Ann

    S. Kinoshita, Global well-posedness for the Cauchy problem of the Zakharov-Kuznetsov equa- tion in 2D,Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, Anal. Non Linéaire, 38, No. 2 (2021), pp. 451–505

    2021

  29. [37]

    Kinoshita, Well-posedness for the Cauchy problem of the modified Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation, Funkcial

    S. Kinoshita, Well-posedness for the Cauchy problem of the modified Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation, Funkcial. Ekvac., 65, No. 2 (2022), pp. 139–158

    2022

  30. [38]

    Lannes, F

    D. Lannes, F. Linares and J.-C. Saut, The Cauchy problem for the Euler-Poisson system and derivation of the Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation,Studies in phase space analysis with applications to PDEs, 181–213, Progr. Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl., 84, Birkhäuser/Springer, N...

  31. [39]

    Linares and A

    F. Linares and A. Pastor, Well-posedness for the two-dimensional modified Zakharov- Kuznetsov equation,SIAM J. Math. Anal., 41, No. 4 (2009), pp. 1323–1339

    2009

  32. [40]

    Linares and A

    F. Linares and A. Pastor, Local and global well-posedness for the 2D generalized Zakharov- Kuznetsov equation,J. Funct. Anal., 260, No. 4 (2011), pp. 1060-1085

    2011

  33. [41]

    Linares and G

    F. Linares and G. Ponce, Introduction to nonlinear dispersive equations. New York, NY: Springer (2009)

    2009

  34. [42]

    Linares and J.-C

    F. Linares and J.-C. Saut, The Cauchy problem for the 3D Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 24 (2009), pp. 547–565

    2009

  35. [43]

    Molinet and D

    L. Molinet and D. Pilod, Bilinear Strichartz estimates for the Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation and applications,Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, Anal. Non Linéaire, 32, No. 2 (2015), pp. 347–371. 23

    2015

  36. [44]

    Muscalu and J

    C. Muscalu and J. Pipher and T. Tao and C. Thiele, Bi-parameter paraproducts,Acta Math., 193, Vol. 2 (2004), pp. 269-296

    2004

  37. [45]

    Muscalu and W

    C. Muscalu and W. Schlag,Classical and multilinear harmonic analysis. Volume I., Cambridge University Press (2013)

    2013

  38. [46]

    Volume II., Cambridge University Press (2013)

    C.MuscaluandW.Schlag, Classical and multilinear harmonic analysis. Volume II., Cambridge University Press (2013)

    2013

  39. [47]

    Pusateri and J

    F. Pusateri and J. Shatah, Space-time resonances and the null condition for first-order systems of wave equations,Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 66, No. 10 (2013), pp. 1495–1540

    2013

  40. [48]

    Ribaud and S

    F. Ribaud and S. Vento, A note on the Cauchy problem for the 2D generalized Zakharov- Kuznetsov equations,C. R., Math., Acad. Sci. Paris, 350, No. 9–10 (2012), pp. 499–503

    2012

  41. [49]

    Ribaud, S

    F. Ribaud, S. Vento, Well-posedness results for the three-dimensional Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 44 (2012), pp. 2289–2304

    2012

  42. [50]

    E. M. Stein and G. Weiss,Introduction to Fourier analysis on Euclidean spaces, Princeton Math. Ser. 32 (1971), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    1971

  43. [51]

    V. E. Zakharov and E. A. Kuznetsov, Three-dimensional solitons,Sov. Phys. JETP, 39 (1974), pp. 285–286. 24

    1974

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.