Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 51 references

Global well-posedness and scattering for the 2D modified Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that the 2D modified Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation is globally well-posed and scatters for small data in a new critical function space H^{0,1/4}(R^2), reaching the scaling-critical regularity that earlier H^s methods could…

desk verdict First L^2-critical global well-posedness and scattering for 2D mZK via a new weighted space; proof looks sound, with a terse import of the key weighted Strichartz estimate. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.23397 v1 pith:JOYXP6CN submitted 2025-07-31 math.AP

Simão Correia , Shinya Kinoshita This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35A0135B3035B4035Q53
keywords modifiedZakharov-Kuznetsovequationglobalwell-posednessscatteringscaling-criticalregularityanisotropicSobolevspacesatomicStrichartzestimatesill-posedness
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the two-dimensional modified Zakharov-Kuznetsov (mZK) equation, a dispersive PDE describing nonlinear wave propagation, is globally well-posed and scatters for small initial data at the scaling-critical regularity. The authors' central move is a new two-parameter family of spaces $H^{{s,a}}$($R^{2}$) that scale exactly like the classical H^s spaces but assign extra cost to Fourier frequencies where the linear dispersion is weak, namely near the axes ξη=0. In the critical case s=0, a=1/4 the paper proves global well-posedness and scattering, and in the subcritical range s+a≥1/4, 0

What carries the argument

The central object is the two-parameter space $H^{{s,a}}$($R^{2}$) with anisotropic frequency weights |D_x|^a|D_y|^{-a} and |D_y|^a|D_x|^{-a}, chosen so that the space scales as H^s while penalizing concentration near the degenerate set ξη=0. The argument is carried by $U^{2}$ and $V^{2}$ atomic spaces adapted to the linear flow, the weighted $L^{4}$ Strichartz estimate \||D_x|^{1/8}|D_y|^{1/8} $e^{{-t(∂_x^3+∂_y^3)}}$ f\|_{$L^{4}$_{t,x,y}} ≲ \|f\|_{$L^{2}$}, the $L^{2}$ bilinear Strichartz estimates for nonresonant interactions, and the resulting multilinear estimate (3.5) that controls the Duhamel term in the Y norm. These estimates combine to make the fixed-point map a contraction for small data, and the Y-norm control gives the scattering limit.

What would settle it

Compute the $L^{4}$ norm of |D_x|^{1/8}|D_y|^{1/8} $e^{{-t(∂_x^3+∂_y^3)}}$ f_N for a sequence f_N whose Fourier transform is concentrated in a unit ball around (ξ,η)=(N,$N^{{-1}}$), a point inside the weak-dispersion region near the axes. If the ratio of that $L^{4}$ norm to \|f_N\|_{$L^{2}$} is unbounded, Lemma 2.8 fails and Theorem 1.1 collapses; the proof requires this ratio to be uniformly bounded.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the authors' own terms, the paper's discovery is that the failure of earlier H^s methods to reach the critical regularity s_c=0 is caused by insufficient control of frequency configurations with ξη≈0, where the linear group $e^{{-t(∂_x^3+∂_y^3)}}$ loses decay. The anisotropic spaces $H^{{s,a}}$, defined by the norms \||D_x|^a|D_y|^{-a}u\|_{H^s} + \||D_y|^a|D_x|^{-a}u\|_{H^s}, scale as H^s and penalize those configurations in a controlled way. Within these spaces, a contraction argument in atomic $U^{2}$-type resolution spaces yields a global solution for small data in $H^{{0,1/4}}$($R^{2}$) and the existence of a final state v_+ ∈ $H^{{0,1/4}}$($R^{2}$) with lim_{t→∞} $e^{{t(∂_x^3+∂_y^3)}}$v(t) = v_+, i.e., scattering. The paper further proves local well-posedness for s+a≥1/4 with a<1/4, and shows by explicit counterexamples that below s+a=1/4 the solution map is not $C^{3}$, and that no global-in-time fixed-point argument can work for a<1/4.

Load-bearing premise

The whole theorem rests on the imported weighted $L^{4}$ Strichartz estimate (Lemma 2.8) and on the similarly imported bilinear Strichartz estimates; if any of these is false or needs a stronger weight than 1/8, the critical multilinear estimate (3.5) and with it Theorem 1.1 would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Small initial data in H^{0,1/4}(R^2) produce global solutions that converge, after multiplication by the linear flow, to a fixed final state as t→∞.
  • The local well-posedness range s+a≥1/4, 0<a<1/4 gives a family of subcritical well-posedness results that interpolate between the known endpoint a=0, s=1/4 and the new critical case.
  • The C^3-flow counterexamples show that no contraction-method well-posedness result below s+a=1/4 exists in the H^{s,a} scale, so the regularity threshold is sharp for this method.
  • The global-in-time fixed-point obstruction for a<1/4 explains why the anisotropic weight a=1/4 is necessary for scattering, not just sufficient.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same anisotropic-weighting strategy may transfer to the unmodified 2D Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation (k=1), where a gap between local well-posedness and the scaling-critical regularity s_c=-1/2 remains, or to other dispersive models whose symbols degenerate along submanifolds.
  • Because Theorem 1.1 gives scattering rather than only global existence, it may make it possible to construct wave operators at critical regularity, extending previous high-regularity wave-operator results.
  • A direct check of the weighted L^4 Strichartz estimate for data concentrated near the axes ξη=0 could serve as a test of the paper's critical lemma before adapting the method to neighboring equations.
  • The ill-posedness for a<1/4 indicates that any future proof reaching s=0 for related ZK-type equations will need to build in weights with exactly the critical homogeneity a=1/4, because the cubic interaction near the axes is the obstruction that must be controlled.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the Cauchy problem for the two-dimensional modified Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation in the symmetrized form ∂t v + (∂x^3 + ∂y^3)v + (∂x + ∂y)(v^3) = 0. The authors introduce a two-parameter scale H^{s,a}(R^2) with anisotropic weights |D_x|^a|D_y|^{-a} and |D_y|^a|D_x|^{-a}, which scales like the classical H^s spaces. The main results are local well-posedness in H^{s,a} for s+a ≥ 1/4, 0 ≤ a < 1/4, and global well-posedness with scattering for small data in the critical space H^{0,1/4}(R^2). The proof reduces the critical case to a multilinear estimate (Proposition 3.3) proved by a detailed dyadic case analysis using weighted L^4 Strichartz estimates, bilinear Strichartz estimates, and U^2/V^2 atomic spaces. The paper also proves that the data-to-solution map is not C^3 below this threshold, and that no global fixed-point argument can work for a < 1/4.

Significance. If the proof is correct, Theorem 1.1 is the first scaling-critical global well-posedness and scattering result for the 2D modified Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation. The H^{s,a} scale is a natural device to compensate for the anisotropic loss of dispersion near ξη = 0, and the paper gives both positive results and sharp C^3 ill-posedness statements. The authors are transparent about the imported ingredients: the weighted L^4 Strichartz estimate is taken from Kenig-Ponce-Vega and the bilinear estimates from earlier work of Molinet-Pilod and the second author. The internal case analysis of Proposition 3.3 is extensive and the reduction from the multilinear estimate to the fixed-point argument is standard. These are genuine strengths that make the paper of high interest to the dispersive PDE community.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.2 and §3, Eq. (3.8)] The definition of the weight ω in Section 2.2 is inconsistent with (3.1) and with the definition of H^{0,1/4}. As printed, ω(ξ,η) = |ξ|^{1/4}|η|^{1/4} + |η|^{1/4}|ξ|^{1/4} = 2|ξη|^{1/4}, whereas the Y norm must correspond to |ξ|^{1/4}|η|^{-1/4} + |η|^{1/4}|ξ|^{-1/4} to be equivalent to the H^{0,1/4} norm; the latter is exactly what is used in (3.1). In the same direction, the target (3.8) has the left factor M_4^{5/4}N_4^{1/4}, but after absorbing the derivative and ω_4 one expects M_4^{5/4}N_4^{-1/4} (as is used later in (3.12)). I believe these are typos, but they must be corrected and all subsequent exponents checked, because the Y norm is the central resolution space for Theorem 1.1.
  2. [§2.3, Lemma 2.8] The weighted L^4 Strichartz estimate (2.7) is the endpoint input for the baseline bound (3.9) and, via (2.15), for every case of Proposition 3.3. The proof given is only the sentence "This follows directly from [30], since det D^2(ξ^3+η^3) = 36ξη." The determinant identifies where the curvature vanishes, but it does not by itself explain why the compensating weights |D_x|^{1/8}|D_y|^{1/8} are exactly critical, nor does it display the uniform dependence on anisotropic dyadic rectangles with N ≫ M or N ≪ M. Since the K-factor in (3.6) cannot absorb any loss in the weight exponent, I ask the authors to provide a complete proof of (2.7) or a precise reference to the exact theorem/equation in [30] that implies this estimate in the required uniform form.
  3. [§3, Eqs. (3.14)–(3.15)] The dyadic summation estimates (3.14) and (3.15) are load-bearing: they are what convert the interpolated bounds into the K-factor (M_min/M_max)^{0+}(N_min/N_max)^{0+} times ω_1ω_2ω_3. As written, these inequalities are simply asserted, and the interpolation step in (3.12)–(3.13) suppresses a logarithmic factor that must be absorbed. This is the hardest part of the case analysis for a reader to verify. Please expand the derivation of (3.14)–(3.15), stating explicitly the summation lemma and the choice of the small parameters ε, δ and the 0+ exponents.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§4, first line] The proof of Theorem 1.2 is announced as "we prove Theorem 1.1"; this should read Theorem 1.2 (or Theorem 2.7).
  2. [§5, Proof of Proposition 1.5] The proof begins with "when 0 ≤ a < 1/4", but the proposition states 0 ≤ a ≤ 1/4. Please clarify how the endpoint a = 1/4, s < 1/4 - a is handled, or adjust the statement if the proof really requires a < 1/4.
  3. [§3, Proof of Theorem 1.1] The fixed-point argument is written only for t ≥ 0. Since the equation is reversible under (t,x,y) ↦ (-t,-x,-y), global well-posedness on R follows, but this should be stated explicitly.
  4. [§2.3, Lemma 2.11] Item (2) is stated but the proof given only covers item (1). Please add a sentence explaining that (2) follows by the same argument after inserting the modulation projections Q_{L_j}.
  5. [Throughout] There are several small typos: "SCATTERING" and "EQUATION" in the title, "spces" in Section 2.1, "equativalent" in Section 4, and the unused symbol δ in the K of Remark 3.2. These should be corrected in the final version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular reasoning found: the critical multilinear estimate is proved from external Strichartz inputs, and self-citations appear only as independent benchmarks and interpolation endpoints.

full rationale

The derivation chain for Theorem 1.1 is self-contained at the point where circularity could arise. The core input is the multilinear estimate (3.5), proved in Proposition 3.3 via Lemma 3.1 (duality, Proposition 2.3, Cauchy-Schwarz) plus the dyadic bound (3.4), which is established by a case analysis using three imported ingredients: the weighted L4 Strichartz bound (2.7) from Kenig-Ponce-Vega [30] (related to the optimal L4 restriction theorem of Carbery-Kenig-Ziesler [8]), the bilinear estimates (2.10)-(2.18) from Molinet-Pilod [42] and Kinoshita [33, Section 2], and the high-modulation bound (2.19) from [37, Lemma 4.35]. All are external, parameter-free, stated with explicit hypotheses, and none contains Theorem 1.1 or the H^{s,a} well-posedness claim. Lemma 2.8 is proved by a one-line reference to [30] with det D^2(xi^3+eta^3)=36xi*eta; the brevity is a display-of-proof concern (a correctness risk if the estimate or its uniformity over anisotropic dyadic blocks fails), not circularity, because [30] is independent of the present authors and its statement is not the paper's conclusion. The spaces H^{0,1/4} and Y are chosen to match the weights forced by the dispersive estimates (a=1/4 emerges from interpolating the |Dx|^{1/8}|Dy|^{1/8} L4 bound with the bilinear gains), but well-posedness is not true by construction: Lemma 3.1's condition (3.3) requires the dyadic sum over all N_j, M_j blocks to close, which is precisely the content of Proposition 3.3's Cases 1-3, and Propositions 1.5-1.6 are genuine lower-bound computations (Bourgain-type) excluding a<1/4 for C^3 flows and for global fixed points. Self-citations [32, 33, 26] are not load-bearing circular inputs: the bilinear estimates cited to [33, Section 2] are independently proved there for the same linear flow; Theorem 1.2 interpolates the new critical estimate (4.4) with the known s=1/4 estimate (4.5) from [33], where the interior 0<a<1/4 range is genuinely new content rather than a renamed input; and the C^3 counterexample of Section 5 is explicitly re-derived with the new weights. No uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors, no ansatz is smuggled in via citation (Segata [49] is credited for the weight idea), and the result is not a renaming of a known result. The derivation is self-contained; score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities or fitted constants. It relies on established background results from the literature. The new H^{s,a} spaces are a mathematical construction, not an invented entity.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Weighted L4 Strichartz estimate (Lemma 2.8): || |Dx|^{1/8}|Dy|^{1/8} e^{-t(∂x^3+∂y^3)} f ||_{L4_{t,x,y}} ≲ ||f||_{L2}
    Imported from [30] and [8]; essential for estimating the cubic term at critical regularity.
  • standard math Bilinear L2 Strichartz estimates (Lemmas 2.10-2.12)
    Taken from Molinet-Pilod [42] and Kinoshita [33]; used to handle nonresonant interactions in the multilinear estimate.
  • standard math U^2/V^2 atomic space theory, including duality and interpolation (Prop 2.3, 2.5)
    Standard framework from Hadac-Herr-Koch [24,25] and Koch-Tataru [36]; used to define resolution spaces and prove the fixed-point estimate.
  • standard math High-modulation estimate (Lemma 2.14)
    From Koch-Tataru-Visan [37]; used in case 2C2 of the multilinear estimate.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Global well-posedness and scattering for the 2D modified Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JOYXP6CN

@misc{pith2026250723397,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Global well-posedness and scattering for the 2D modified Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JOYXP6CN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.23397}
}
abstract

We consider the Cauchy problem associated with the modified Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation over $\mathbb{R}^2$. Taking into consideration the associated dispersive effects, we introduce, for $s,a\ge 0$, a two-parameter space $H^{s,a}(\mathbb{R}^2)$, which scales as the classic $H^s$ spaces. In this new class, we prove local well-posedness for $s+a\ge 1/4$, $0<a<1/4$, and global well-posedness and scattering for small data in the case $s=0, \ a=1/4$. These results are shown to be sharp in the sense of $C^3$-flows.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [30]

    Kenig, Gustavo Ponce, and Luis Vega

    Carlos E. Kenig, Gustavo Ponce, and Luis Vega. Oscillatory integrals and regularity of dis- persive equations.Indiana Univ. Math. J., 40(1):33–69, 1991

    work page 1991

  2. [1]

    Low regularity local well-posedness for the zero energy Novikov-Veselov equation.SIAM J

    Joseph Adams and Axel Gr¨ unrock. Low regularity local well-posedness for the zero energy Novikov-Veselov equation.SIAM J. Math. Anal., 55(1):19–35, 2023

    work page 2023

  3. [2]

    Well-posedness and ill-posedness results for the Novikov-Veselov equa- tion.Commun

    Yannis Angelopoulos. Well-posedness and ill-posedness results for the Novikov-Veselov equa- tion.Commun. Pure Appl. Anal., 15(3):727–760, 2016

    work page 2016

  4. [3]

    Scattering of the 2D modified Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation

    Phillipe Anjolras. Scattering of the 2d modified Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation.preprint, arXiv:2506.17179, 2025

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  5. [4]

    Selfsimilar solutions of the binormal flow and their stability

    Valeria Banica and Luis Vega. Selfsimilar solutions of the binormal flow and their stability. In Singularities in mechanics: formation, propagation and microscopic description, volume 38 ofPanor. Synth` eses, pages 1–35. Soc. Math. France, Paris, 2012

    work page 2012

  6. [5]

    Sharp well-posedness and ill-posedness results for a quadratic non-linear Schr¨ odinger equation.J

    Ioan Bejenaru and Terence Tao. Sharp well-posedness and ill-posedness results for a quadratic non-linear Schr¨ odinger equation.J. Funct. Anal., 233(1):228–259, 2006

    work page 2006

  7. [6]

    Bourgain

    J. Bourgain. Periodic Korteweg de Vries equation with measures as initial data.Selecta Math. (N.S.), 3(2):115–159, 1997

    work page 1997

  8. [7]

    Blow-up Dynamics for theL 2 critical case of the 2D Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation.preprint, arXiv:2406.06568, 2024

    Francisc Bozgan, Tej-Eddine Ghoul, Nader Masmoudi, and Kai Yang. Blow-up Dynamics for theL 2 critical case of the 2D Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation.preprint, arXiv:2406.06568, 2024

    arXiv 2024

Show all 51 references
  1. [8]

    Carbery, C

    A. Carbery, C. E. Kenig, and S. N. Ziesler. Restriction for homogeneous polynomial surfaces inR 3.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 365(5):2367–2407, 2013

    2013

  2. [9]

    Weissler

    Thierry Cazenave and Fred B. Weissler. The Cauchy problem for the critical nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation inHs.Nonlinear Anal., 14(10):807–836, 1990

    1990

  3. [10]

    Weissler

    Thierry Cazenave and Fred B. Weissler. Scattering theory and self-similar solutions for the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation.SIAM J. Math. Anal., 31(3):625–650, 2000

    2000

  4. [11]

    On the Near Soliton Dynamics for the 2D Cubic Zakharov–Kuznetsov Equations.Comm

    Gong Chen, Yang Lan, and Xu Yuan. On the Near Soliton Dynamics for the 2D Cubic Zakharov–Kuznetsov Equations.Comm. Math. Phys., 406(8):Paper No. 200, 2025

    2025

  5. [12]

    Asymptotics in Fourier space of self-similar solutions to the modified Korteweg–de Vries equation.J

    Sim˜ ao Correia, Rapha¨ el Cˆ ote, and Luis Vega. Asymptotics in Fourier space of self-similar solutions to the modified Korteweg–de Vries equation.J. Math. Pures Appl. (9), 137:101–142, 2020

    2020

  6. [13]

    Self-similar dynamics for the modified Korteweg–de Vries equation.Int

    Sim˜ ao Correia, Rapha¨ el Cˆ ote, and Luis Vega. Self-similar dynamics for the modified Korteweg–de Vries equation.Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN, (13):9958–10013, 2021. 22 SIM ˜AO CORREIA AND SHINYA KINOSHITA

    2021

  7. [14]

    Asymptotic stability of high-dimensional Zakharov-Kuznetsov solitons.Arch

    Rapha¨ el Cˆ ote, Claudio Mu˜ noz, Didier Pilod, and Gideon Simpson. Asymptotic stability of high-dimensional Zakharov-Kuznetsov solitons.Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 220(2):639–710, 2016

    2016

  8. [15]

    Stability and instability of some nonlinear dispersive solitary waves in higher dimension.Proc

    Anne de Bouard. Stability and instability of some nonlinear dispersive solitary waves in higher dimension.Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A, 126(1):89–112, 1996

    1996

  9. [16]

    Blow-up in finite or infinite time of the 2d cubic Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation.preprint, arXiv:1810.05121, 2018

    Luiz Gustavo Farah, Justin Holmer, Svetlana Roudenko, and Kai Yang. Blow-up in finite or infinite time of the 2d cubic Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation.preprint, arXiv:1810.05121, 2018

    2018

  10. [17]

    Asymptotic stabil- ity of solitary waves of the 3D quadratic Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation.Amer

    Luiz Gustavo Farah, Justin Holmer, Svetlana Roudenko, and Kai Yang. Asymptotic stabil- ity of solitary waves of the 3D quadratic Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation.Amer. J. Math., 145(6):1695–1775, 2023

    2023

  11. [18]

    Global solutions for 3D quadratic Schr¨ odinger equations.Int

    Pierre Germain, Nader Masmoudi, and Jalal Shatah. Global solutions for 3D quadratic Schr¨ odinger equations.Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN, (3):414–432, 2009

    2009

  12. [19]

    Global solutions for the gravity water waves equation in dimension 3.Ann

    Pierre Germain, Nader Masmoudi, and Jalal Shatah. Global solutions for the gravity water waves equation in dimension 3.Ann. of Math. (2), 175(2):691–754, 2012

    2012

  13. [20]

    Ginibre, Y

    J. Ginibre, Y. Tsutsumi, and G. Velo. On the Cauchy problem for the Zakharov system.J. Funct. Anal., 151(2):384–436, 1997

    1997

  14. [21]

    Kurianski, and Gigliola Staffilani

    Ricardo Grande, Kristin M. Kurianski, and Gigliola Staffilani. On the nonlinear Dysthe equation.Nonlinear Anal., 207:Paper No. 112292, 36, 2021

    2021

  15. [22]

    A remark on the modified Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation in three space di- mensions.Math

    Axel Gr¨ unrock. A remark on the modified Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation in three space di- mensions.Math. Res. Lett., 21(1):127–131, 2014

    2014

  16. [23]

    The Fourier restriction norm method for the Zakharov- Kuznetsov equation.Discrete Contin

    Axel Gr¨ unrock and Sebastian Herr. The Fourier restriction norm method for the Zakharov- Kuznetsov equation.Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 34(5):2061–2068, 2014

    2014

  17. [24]

    Well-posedness and scattering for the KP- II equation in a critical space.Ann

    Martin Hadac, Sebastian Herr, and Herbert Koch. Well-posedness and scattering for the KP- II equation in a critical space.Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire, 26(3):917–941, 2009

    2009

  18. [25]

    Well-posedness and scattering for the KP-II equation in a critical space

    Martin Hadac, Sebastian Herr, and Herbert Koch. Erratum to “Well-posedness and scattering for the KP-II equation in a critical space” [Ann. I. H. Poincar´ e—AN 26 (3) (2009) 917–941] [mr2526409].Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire, 27(3):971–972, 2010

    2009

  19. [26]

    Subcritical well-posedness results for the Zakharov- Kuznetsov equation in dimension three and higher.Ann

    Sebastian Herr and Shinya Kinoshita. Subcritical well-posedness results for the Zakharov- Kuznetsov equation in dimension three and higher.Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble), 73(3):1203–1267, 2023

    2023

  20. [27]

    Local ill-posedness of the 1D Zakharov system.Electron

    Justin Holmer. Local ill-posedness of the 1D Zakharov system.Electron. J. Differential Equa- tions, pages No. 24, 22, 2007

    2007

  21. [28]

    Dispersive estimates for rational symbols and local well-posedness of the nonzero energy NV equation.J

    Anna Kazeykina and Claudio Mu˜ noz. Dispersive estimates for rational symbols and local well-posedness of the nonzero energy NV equation.J. Funct. Anal., 270(5):1744–1791, 2016

    2016

  22. [29]

    Dispersive estimates for rational symbols and local well- posedness of the nonzero energy NV equation

    Anna Kazeykina and Claudio Mu˜ noz. Dispersive estimates for rational symbols and local well- posedness of the nonzero energy NV equation. II.J. Differential Equations, 264(7):4822–4888, 2018

    2018

  23. [31]

    Kenig, Gustavo Ponce, and Luis Vega

    Carlos E. Kenig, Gustavo Ponce, and Luis Vega. Well-posedness and scattering results for the generalized Korteweg-de Vries equation via the contraction principle.Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 46(4):527–620, 1993

    1993

  24. [32]

    Global well-posedness for the Cauchy problem of the Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation in 2D.Ann

    Shinya Kinoshita. Global well-posedness for the Cauchy problem of the Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation in 2D.Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire, 38(2):451–505, 2021

    2021

  25. [33]

    Well-posedness for the Cauchy problem of the modified Zakharov- Kuznetsov equation.Funkcial

    Shinya Kinoshita. Well-posedness for the Cauchy problem of the modified Zakharov- Kuznetsov equation.Funkcial. Ekvac., 65(2):139–158, 2022

    2022

  26. [34]

    Dispersive estimates for principally normal pseudodiffer- ential operators.Comm

    Herbert Koch and Daniel Tataru. Dispersive estimates for principally normal pseudodiffer- ential operators.Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 58(2):217–284, 2005

    2005

  27. [35]

    A priori bounds for the 1D cubic NLS in negative Sobolev spaces.Int

    Herbert Koch and Daniel Tataru. A priori bounds for the 1D cubic NLS in negative Sobolev spaces.Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN, (16):Art. ID rnm053, 36, 2007

    2007

  28. [36]

    Conserved energies for the cubic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation in one dimension.Duke Math

    Herbert Koch and Daniel Tataru. Conserved energies for the cubic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation in one dimension.Duke Math. J., 167(17):3207–3313, 2018

    2018

  29. [37]

    Birkh¨ auser/Springer, Basel, 2014

    Herbert Koch, Daniel Tataru, and Monica Vi¸san.Dispersive equations and nonlinear waves, volume 45 ofOberwolfach Seminars. Birkh¨ auser/Springer, Basel, 2014. Generalized Korteweg-de Vries, nonlinear Schr¨ odinger, wave and Schr¨ odinger maps. GLOBAL EXISTENCE AND SCATTERING F...

    2014

  30. [38]

    The Cauchy problem for the Euler- Poisson system and derivation of the Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation

    David Lannes, Felipe Linares, and Jean-Claude Saut. The Cauchy problem for the Euler- Poisson system and derivation of the Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation. InStudies in phase space analysis with applications to PDEs, volume 84 ofProgr. Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl., pages...

    2013

  31. [39]

    Well-posedness for the two-dimensional modified Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation.SIAM J

    Felipe Linares and Ademir Pastor. Well-posedness for the two-dimensional modified Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation.SIAM J. Math. Anal., 41(4):1323–1339, 2009

    2009

  32. [40]

    Local and global well-posedness for the 2D generalized Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation.J

    Felipe Linares and Ademir Pastor. Local and global well-posedness for the 2D generalized Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation.J. Funct. Anal., 260(4):1060–1085, 2011

    2011

  33. [41]

    The Cauchy problem for the 3D Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation.Discrete Contin

    Felipe Linares and Jean-Claude Saut. The Cauchy problem for the 3D Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation.Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 24(2):547–565, 2009

    2009

  34. [42]

    Bilinear Strichartz estimates for the Zakharov-Kuznetsov equa- tion and applications.Ann

    Luc Molinet and Didier Pilod. Bilinear Strichartz estimates for the Zakharov-Kuznetsov equa- tion and applications.Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire, 32(2):347–371, 2015

    2015

  35. [43]

    Global well-posedness for the KP-II equation on the background of a non-localized solution.Ann

    Luc Molinet, Jean-Claude Saut, and Nikolay Tzvetkov. Global well-posedness for the KP-II equation on the background of a non-localized solution.Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire, 28(5):653–676, 2011

    2011

  36. [44]

    Weissler

    Luc Molinet, St´ ephane Vento, and Fred B. Weissler. Self-similar solutions for the generalized fractional korteweg-de vries equation.preprint, arXiv:2410.12063, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Global well-posedness and scattering for the Dysthe equation inL 2(R2).J

    Razvan Mosincat, Didier Pilod, and Jean-Claude Saut. Global well-posedness and scattering for the Dysthe equation inL 2(R2).J. Math. Pures Appl. (9), 149:73–97, 2021

    2021

  38. [46]

    Asymptotic stability of a finite sum of solitary waves for the Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation.Nonlinearity, 37(10):Paper No

    Didier Pilod and Fr´ ed´ eric Valet. Asymptotic stability of a finite sum of solitary waves for the Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation.Nonlinearity, 37(10):Paper No. 105001, 41, 2024

    2024

  39. [47]

    A note on the Cauchy problem for the 2D generalized Zakharov-Kuznetsov equations.C

    Francis Ribaud and St´ ephane Vento. A note on the Cauchy problem for the 2D generalized Zakharov-Kuznetsov equations.C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris, 350(9-10):499–503, 2012

    2012

  40. [48]

    Well-posedness results for the three-dimensional Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation.SIAM J

    Francis Ribaud and St´ ephane Vento. Well-posedness results for the three-dimensional Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation.SIAM J. Math. Anal., 44(4):2289–2304, 2012

    2012

  41. [49]

    Existence of wave operators for Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation in two space dimensions.preprint, arXiv:2507.01288, 2025

    Jun-ichi Segata. Existence of wave operators for Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation in two space dimensions.preprint, arXiv:2507.01288, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Remark on the local ill-posedness for KdV equation.C

    Nickolay Tzvetkov. Remark on the local ill-posedness for KdV equation.C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris S´ er. I Math., 329(12):1043–1047, 1999

    1999

  43. [51]

    V. E. Zakharov and E. A. Kuznetsov. Three-dimensional solitons.Sov. Phys. JETP, 39:285–286, 1974. Sim˜ao Correia Center for Mathematical Analysis, Geometry and Dynamical Systems, Department of Mathematics, Instituto Superior T´ ecnico, Universidade de Lisboa Av. Rovisco Pais, ...

    1974

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.