Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Programming Quantum Computers with Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.18125 v1 pith:PXSXV4HK submitted 2025-06-22 quant-ph

classification quant-ph
keywords quantumavailablellmsprogrammingaccessiblebeenchatgptcircuits
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) promise transformative change to fields as diverse as medical diagnosis, legal services, and software development. One reason for such an impact is LLMs' ability to make highly technical endeavors more accessible to a broader audience. Accessibility has long been a goal for the growing fields of quantum computing, informatics, and engineering, especially as more quantum systems become publicly available via cloud interfaces. Between programming quantum computers and using LLMs, the latter seems the more accessible task: while leveraging an LLM's fullest potential requires experience with prompt engineering, any literate person can provide queries and read responses. By contrast, designing and executing quantum programs -- outside of those available online -- requires significant background knowledge, from selection of operations for algorithm implementation to configuration choices for particular hardware specifications and providers. Current research is exploring LLM utility for classical software development, but there has been relatively little investigation into the same for quantum programming. Consequently, this work is a first look at how well an uncustomized, publicly available LLM can write straightforward quantum circuits. We examine how well OpenAI's ChatGPT (GPT-4) can write quantum circuits for two hardware providers: the superconducting qubit machines of IBM and the photonic devices of Xanadu. We find that ChatGPT currently fares substantially better with the former.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. QFoldAgent: An Autonomous Quantum Optimization Multi-Agent System for Protein Structure Prediction

    cs.AI 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An LLM-driven closed-loop controller that refines VQE Hamiltonian penalties improves structural validity and optimization behavior for 5-residue lattice protein folding.

Pith tools