Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Improving precision of cumulative incidence estimates in randomized controlled trials with external controls

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.18415 v1 pith:USYYNWTA submitted 2025-06-23 stat.ME

Improving precision of cumulative incidence estimates in randomized controlled trials with external controls

classification stat.ME
keywords controlsexternaltrialsdataefficiencytreatmentapplicationbounds
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Augmenting the control arm in clinical trials with external data can improve statistical power for demonstrating treatment effects. In many time-to-event outcome trials, participants are subject to truncation by death. Direct application of methods for competing risks analysis on the joint data may introduce bias, for example, due to covariate shifts between the populations. In this work, we consider transportability of the conditional cause-specific hazard of the event of interest under the control treatment. Under this assumption, we derive semiparametric efficiency bounds of causal cumulative incidences. This allows for quantification of the theoretical efficiency gain from incorporating the external controls. We propose triply robust estimators that can achieve the efficiency bounds, where the trial controls and external controls are made comparable through time-specific weights in a martingale integral. We conducted a simulation study to show the precision gain of the proposed fusion estimators compared to their counterparts without utilizing external controls. As a real data application, we used two cardiovascular outcome trials conducted to assess the safety of glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists. Incorporating the external controls from one trial into the other, we observed a decrease in the standard error of the treatment effects on adverse non-fatal cardiovascular events with all-cause death as the competing risk.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Robust Estimation and Inference with Selective Borrowing in Hybrid Controlled Trials: A Tutorial with SelectiveIntegrative and intFRT

    stat.ME 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Tutorial on a statistical roadmap and R packages for selective borrowing in hybrid controlled trials, demonstrated on synthetic lung cancer data.

  2. Externally Controlled Trials: A Review of Design and Borrowing Through a Causal Lens

    stat.ME 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 1.0

    A review organizes externally controlled trial methodology through causal estimands and identifiability assumptions for single-arm and hybrid designs with borrowing strategies.