Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 82 references

Emergent collective dynamics from motile photokinetic organisms

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read An agent-based model reduces diel vertical migration to two dimensionless parameters, mapping four collective regimes.

desk verdict A plausible and useful four-regime phase diagram for photokinetic swimmers, undermined by an overstated two-parameter universality claim and an inconsistent analytical aside. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.19081 v1 pith:EDRDPBD5 submitted 2025-06-23 cond-mat.soft

J. Morales , P. Munoz , D. Noto , H.N Ulloa , F. Guzman-Lastra This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.soft
keywords dielverticalmigrationagent-basedmodelphotokinesisgyrotaxisPécletnumbercollectivebehavioractivematterlightniche
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the large-scale collective patterns of light-driven swimming organisms, notably the daily vertical migration of plankton, can be captured by an agent-based model in which each swimmer follows simple local rules: self-propulsion, gyrotactic reorientation, rotational noise, and a vertical speed that responds to local light relative to a preferred isolume. Solving the Langevin dynamics of a swarm produces four robust population-level regimes, Surface Accumulation, Shallow DVM, Deep DVM, and Sinking, organized by just two dimensionless parameters: the Péclet number $Pe$ (persistence versus rotational diffusion) and the vertical speed ratio $W=w_{\mathrm{down}}/w_{\mathrm{up}}$ (photokinetic asymmetry). The central insight is a feedback: upward-biased swimming reinforces surface aggregation, while sufficient downward bias is irreversible and collapses migration. If correct, this offers a mechanistic bridge from organism-scale behavior to the statistical vertical distributions observed in lakes and oceans.

What carries the argument

The central object is the coupled Langevin system for each swimmer, Eqs. (6)-(7): position updates from self-propulsion $u_0\hat{p}_i$, repulsive collisions, and a light-modulated vertical swimming speed $W(z,t)$, plus orientation updates from rotational white noise and a gyrotactic torque that reorients the body against gravity on timescale $\tau_G$. The light-dependent swimming strategy, Eq. (3), compares local intensity to the isolume $I^*=0.85I_0$ and sets upward and downward speeds through tanh response functions, so the two parameters $Pe=u_0/(D_R\sigma)$ and $W=w_{\mathrm{down}}/w_{\mathrm{up}}$ enter through the noise amplitude and the speed asymmetry. The analytical boundary estimate, Eq. (5), comes from setting the mean vertical velocity to zero at the isolume, using the Fokker-Planck polarization $\langle p\rangle=\coth(\lambda)-1/\lambda$ with $\lambda=Pe[\sigma/(\tau_G u_0)]$.

What would settle it

Repeat the $(Pe,W)$ scan with the isolume threshold changed to, say, $I^*=0.5I_0$ or $0.95I_0$, or with $w_{\mathrm{up}}$ varied, and check whether the locations of the four regime boundaries in the $(Pe,W)$ plane shift by more than a small tolerance; if they do, the claimed two-parameter control fails. Alternatively, measure $w_{\mathrm{down}}/w_{\mathrm{up}}$ and persistence length for a species such as Daphnia or Heterosigma akashiwo and test whether the predicted Deep-DVM band $0.3\lesssim W\lesssim 1.25$ matches observed vertical distributions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The discovery, on the paper's own terms, is that macroscopic diel vertical migration is not a single phenomenon but a family of four collective regimes, and the regime a population lands in is set almost entirely by two numbers. In simulations spanning $Pe$ and $W$, a sharply peaked distribution at the nocturnal niche marks Shallow DVM, a peaked distribution with a deep tail synchronized with the moving isolume marks Deep DVM, confinement near the surface marks Surface Accumulation, and a broad deep distribution marks irreversible Sinking. The paper shows that Deep DVM, the canonical migration, requires balanced upward and downward speeds with $W\approx 1$, and that the transition to Sinking can be estimated analytically from the condition that the mean vertical velocity vanishes, giving a critical $W$ that is never below 1. It also reports that when $Pe<1$, where stochastic reorientation dominates, the collective pattern is largely insensitive to $Pe$ and shaped mainly by $W$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that fixing the isolume threshold at $I^*=0.85I_0$, the upward speed $w_{\mathrm{up}}=2u_0$, the gyrotactic timescale $\tau_G=1$, and the response parameters $L$ and $R$ does not change the qualitative phase boundaries, so that $Pe$ and $W$ alone govern the regimes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A population with balanced upward and downward swimming speeds ($W\approx 1$) should show canonical deep DVM across a broad range of Péclet numbers, whereas strong upward bias ($W\ll 1$) confines the swarm to the upper water column.
  • Once $W$ exceeds the critical value derived from the $w=0$ condition, migration collapses into irreversible Sinking for all $Pe$, so a modest increase in downward bias can eliminate DVM entirely.
  • In noise-dominated populations ($Pe<1$), the regime is controlled almost entirely by the vertical speed ratio $W$, not by persistence, so behavioral asymmetry rather than swimming strength dictates the population pattern.
  • The regime boundaries can be read off time-averaged vertical distributions through the mean position and excess kurtosis, the same statistics that acoustic backscatter profiles provide.
  • The minimum critical $W$ for the Sinking transition equals 1 independently of the gyrotactic timescale, giving a simple, testable threshold for loss of migration.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the two-parameter collapse is robust to the fixed isolume threshold, then field data could be inverted: acoustic backscatter profiles give mean depth and kurtosis, which map onto $(Pe,W)$, yielding organism-level behavioral estimates from population-level observations. (Beyond the paper.)
  • The model omits fluid advection and turbulence; since real DVM occurs in stratified, sheared columns, adding turbulence would effectively renormalize $Pe$ and could shift the delicate $W\approx 1$ Deep-DVM balance, a concrete testable extension.
  • The prediction that $W=1$ is the lower bound for sinking regardless of $\tau_G$ suggests a generic design rule for light-responsive active matter: any mechanism biasing vertical motion downward beyond equality with upward speed will drive irreversible loss from the illuminated zone, testable with synthetic phototactic colloids.
  • Changing water turbidity alters the isolume depth and thus the effective light gradient; the paper's emphasis on gradients rather than absolute intensity implies that turbidity could shift regime boundaries without changing organism-level swimming parameters, which field comparisons could check. (Beyond the paper.)
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript presents a three-dimensional agent-based model of self-propelled photokinetic swimmers that respond to a dynamic light field through a vertical speed modulation rule (Eq. 3), combined with gyrotactic reorientation and rotational noise. The authors perform 120 Brownian dynamics simulations varying the rotational diffusion coefficient and the downward swimming speed, identify four collective regimes (Surface Accumulation, Shallow DVM, Deep DVM, and Sinking), and propose that population-scale dynamics are governed by just two dimensionless parameters: the Péclet number Pe and the vertical speed ratio W. The regimes are characterized through the mean and excess kurtosis of the time- and horizontally-averaged vertical concentration profile, and analytical boundary conditions are proposed in Eqs. (4) and (5). The paper argues that a feedback between upward-biased swimming and gyrotactic alignment drives surface accumulation, while excessive downward bias leads to irreversible sinking.

Significance. If substantiated, the proposed two-parameter organization of diel vertical migration regimes would provide a valuable mechanistic bridge from individual photokinetic responses to population-scale patterns, with potential implications for aquatic ecology and active-matter physics. The simulation study is systematic within its chosen parameter slice: the four regimes are visually and statistically distinguishable in the examples shown, and the use of distribution shape descriptors (mean and excess kurtosis) is a reasonable and transparent way to classify collective behavior. The inclusion of hard-core interactions and stochastic reorientation strengthens the model's realism. However, the central universality claim rests on a single set of fixed behavioral parameters, and the analytical formulas supporting the phase diagram contain algebraic and conceptual inconsistencies. The qualitative regime classification is plausible, but the quantitative claim of two-parameter control is not yet established.

major comments (4)
  1. [Mapping and bounding collective patterns, Eq. (4)] Eq. (4) does not follow from Eq. (3) for general W. For the branch I < I*, Eq. (3) gives w/w_up = 1/2 + (1/2)tanh(A1) + W tanh(A2) - W/2, whereas Eq. (4) reads 1/2 + (1/2)(tanh(A1) + tanh(A2)) - W/2. The two expressions differ by (W - 1/2)tanh(A2), which vanishes only for W = 1/2 or tanh(A2) = 0. Since Fig. 5d and the subsequent feedback argument are built directly on Eq. (4), this algebraic discrepancy is load-bearing and must be corrected or the derivation must be revised.
  2. [Mapping and bounding collective patterns, Eq. (5)] Eq. (5) is introduced as a hypothesis without a derivation linking the zero-vertical-velocity condition to the gyrotactic orientation average <p> = coth(λ) - 1/λ. In addition, substituting the stated value w_up = 2u0 into Eq. (5) gives W = 1 + coth(λ) - 1/(2λ), which is always greater than about 1.8 and does not approach 1 as λ grows; this contradicts the following sentence claiming that the smallest W satisfying the condition is 1. The authors need to provide a step-by-step derivation of Eq. (5) and reconcile its predictions with the parameter values used in the simulations.
  3. [Population-scale collective patterns and Fig. 5] The central claim that the four regimes are governed solely by Pe and W is not supported by the evidence as presented, because all 120 simulations fix I* = 0.85 I0, w_up = 2u0, τ_G = 1, the niche depth H, the response parameters L and R, and the day-night light shape parameters. The phrase 'without loss of generality' is not justified by any scaling argument or control simulations. As written, the (Pe, W) phase diagram is a two-dimensional slice of a higher-dimensional parameter space. The authors should provide sensitivity analyses showing that the regime boundaries are insensitive to these fixed choices, or explicitly revise the claims to describe the behavior within this slice.
  4. [Mapping and bounding collective patterns, Fig. 5(a–b)] The phase diagram lacks uncertainty quantification and a precise description of how the colored boundary dots are determined. Since the regime labels are defined by threshold values of μ/L_z and α, the reader cannot assess the robustness of the boundaries to statistical fluctuations, finite simulation time, or alternative threshold choices. Please specify the classification algorithm and include error bars or a sensitivity analysis of the thresholds.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Methods, Eq. (6)] The symbol W is used both for the vertical swimming speed field in Eq. (6) and for the dimensionless ratio w_down/w_up throughout the rest of the paper; please rename one of them to avoid confusion.
  2. [Methods, Eq. (7)] Please clarify how the noise term in Eq. (7) relates to the rotational diffusion coefficient D_R. With the prefactor 1/γ_R and the stated correlation ⟨ξ_R(t1)ξ_R(t2)⟩ = D_R δ(t1-t2), the effective angular diffusivity is D_R/γ_R^2 unless γ_R = 1; the paper should state the value of γ_R used and how the numerical noise amplitude was chosen.
  3. [ABM modeling framework, Eq. (3) and definitions] The function S(z,t) is defined as S(z,t) = ∂I(z,t)/∂t + k_d, which mixes units of I/time and 1/length; please provide the full nondimensionalization and verify the expression, as this function controls the tanh switches in Eq. (3).
  4. [Fig. 4 caption] The caption for Fig. 4 has a typographical error: 'Deep DVM (Pe=10, W=0.8' is missing a closing parenthesis; it should read '(Pe=10, W=0.8)'.
  5. [Discussion, deep DVM paragraph] The sentence beginning 'This behavior has been observed in phytoplankton communities like H. akashiwo [20]' relies on a reference about sharp turns and gyrotaxis in a different context; please explain explicitly how the cited experiments support the 'floating' mechanism described.
  6. [Discussion, deep DVM paragraph] The statement that the model is the 'first fully three-dimensional agent-based framework that reproduces canonical DVM behavior' may overstate novelty given the existing agent-based DVM literature; consider softening the claim or providing a more precise comparison.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: regimes are direct simulation outputs; analytical conditions are interpretive consistency checks, not fitted predictions.

full rationale

The paper's four regimes are generated by Brownian dynamics simulations over a grid of (Pe,W), with no parameter fitted to the regime boundaries. Eq. 3 is the input swimming rule; Eq. 5 is an approximate w=0 consistency estimate built from the gyrotactic Fokker-Planck mean orientation, not a regression to Fig. 5. The claim that Pe and W govern the dynamics is a description of the varied parameter space; the fixed choices (I*=0.85I0, wup=2u0, tauG=1) are modeling assumptions whose sensitivity is untested, which is a robustness/correctness concern, not circularity. The algebra mismatch between Eq. 3 and Eq. 4 and the underived status of Eq. 5 are derivation-quality issues, not reductions of a prediction to its inputs. Citations to prior work, including the authors' own [21], are contextual and not load-bearing. No self-definitional, fitted-input, or self-citation chain was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on several hand-chosen behavioral and environmental parameters, none of which are fitted to field data. The model introduces no new physical entities. The most consequential choices are the isolume threshold I*=0.85 I0, the fixed upward speed wup=2 u0, and the closed-form swimming strategy in Eq. 3, because the entire phase diagram is computed under these settings.

free parameters (6)
  • Isolume threshold I* = 0.85 I0
    Set to 85% of surface intensity to reduce computational cost, not from organism data; controls target depth z*(t) and therefore all regime boundaries.
  • Upward swimming speed wup = 2 u0
    Fixed for all simulations; since W = wdown/wup, the W axis and all regime boundaries depend on this choice.
  • Gyrotactic timescale tau_G = 1 (unit time)
    Set as the time unit and fixed at 1; orientation alignment and the lambda parameter used in the analytical estimate depend on it.
  • Light response sensitivity L = not specified
    Used in Equation 3 to shape the smooth response; not varied or fitted, and could shift regime boundaries.
  • Rheobase R = R < 20 (typical)
    Threshold in Equation 3; for R >= 20 the swimming response attenuates to zero. Not varied in the simulations.
  • Day-night light shape parameters tau0, b, phi = 1/16, 4, tau_day/2
    Choose the temporal light profile in Equation 1; not motivated by specific field data and not varied.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Light intensity follows Beer-Lambert attenuation with a smooth sinusoidal day-night modulation (Eq. 1).
    The entire light-driven dynamics rests on this form; no validation against measured underwater light fields is provided.
  • domain assumption Organisms track a preferred isolume I* by adjusting vertical velocity according to Eq. 3.
    This is the central behavioral rule; alternative swimming strategies would likely produce different regimes.
  • standard math Orientation dynamics are governed by gyrotactic torque plus white rotational noise, and in darkness the mean orientation is <p>=coth(lambda)-1/lambda.
    Fokker-Planck result from prior literature (Kessler, Pedley-Kessler), used for the analytical estimate in Eq. 5.
  • domain assumption Swimmers interact only through WCA excluded volume; hydrodynamics, turbulence, stratification, and predation are neglected.
    Regimes are emergent properties of this minimal physical model; adding omitted mechanisms may shift the boundaries.
  • domain assumption Downward swimming speeds are drawn from a Poisson distribution with mean wdown.
    Introduced to represent mixed phenotypes; not derived from organism data and not varied.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Emergent collective dynamics from motile photokinetic organisms." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EDRDPBD5

@misc{pith2026250619081,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Emergent collective dynamics from motile photokinetic organisms},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EDRDPBD5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.19081}
}
read the original abstract

The day-night cycle drives the largest biomass migration on Earth: the diel vertical migration (DVM) of aquatic organisms. Here, we present a three-dimensional agent-based model that incorporates photokinesis, gyrotaxis, and stochastic reorientation to explore how individual-level swimming behaviors give rise to population-scale DVM patterns. By solving Langevin equations for swarms of swimmers, we identify four distinct regimes -- Surface Accumulation, Shallow DVM, Deep DVM, and Sinking -- governed by two key dimensionless parameters: the Peclet number (Pe), representing motility persistence, and the vertical swimming asymmetry ratio (W=wdown/wup), encoding photokinetic bias. These regimes emerge from nonlinear interactions between light-driven navigation and active noise, diagnosed through topological and statistical features of vertical distributions. A critical feedback is uncovered: upward-biased swimming (W<1) promotes surface aggregation, while excessive downward bias (W>1) leads to irreversible sinking. Analytical estimates link regime boundaries to gyrotactic alignment and velocity reversals. Together, our results provide a mechanistic framework to interpret DVM diversity and emphasize the central role of light gradients-beyond absolute intensity-in shaping ecological self-organization.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.19081 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    G. C. Hays, A review of the adaptive significance and ecosys- tem consequences of zooplankton diel vertical migrations, Hy- drobiologia503, 163 (2003)

    2003

  2. [2]

    Bianchi, C

    D. Bianchi, C. Stock, E. D. Galbraith, and J. L. Sarmiento, Diel vertical migration: Ecological controls and impacts on the bi- ological pump in a one-dimensional ocean model, Global Bio- geochemical Cycles27, 478 (2013)

    2013

  3. [3]

    D. K. Steinberg and M. R. Landry, Zooplankton and the ocean carbon cycle, Annual review of marine science9, 413 (2017)

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    K. M. Archibald, D. A. Siegel, and S. C. Doney, Modeling the impact of zooplankton diel vertical migration on the carbon ex- port flux of the biological pump, Global Biogeochemical Cycles 33, 181 (2019)

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Ringelberg,Diel Vertical Migration of Zooplankton in Lakes and Oceans: Causal Explanations and Adaptive Significance (Springer, 2010)

    J. Ringelberg,Diel Vertical Migration of Zooplankton in Lakes and Oceans: Causal Explanations and Adaptive Significance (Springer, 2010)

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    Bandara, Ø

    K. Bandara, Ø. Varpe, L. Wijewardene, V . Tverberg, and K. Eiane, Two hundred years of zooplankton vertical migration research, Biological Reviews96, 1547 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Z. M. Gliwicz, Predation and the evolution of vertical migration in zooplankton, Nature320, 746 (1986)

    work page 1986

  8. [8]

    S. M. Bollens and B. Frost, Predator-induced diet vertical mi- gration in a planktonic copepod, Journal of Plankton Research 11, 1047 (1989)

    work page 1989

Show all 82 references
  1. [9]

    Lampert, The adaptive significance of diel vertical migration of zooplankton, Functional Ecology3, 21 (1989)

    W. Lampert, The adaptive significance of diel vertical migration of zooplankton, Functional Ecology3, 21 (1989)

    1989

  2. [10]

    W. E. Neill, Induced vertical migration in copepods as a defence against invertebrate predation, Nature345, 524 (1990)

    1990

  3. [11]

    T. B. Kelly, P. C. Davison, R. Goericke, M. R. Landry, M. D. Ohman, and M. R. Stukel, The importance of mesozooplankton diel vertical migration for sustaining a mesopelagic food web, Frontiers in Marine Science6, 508 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    Ludvigsen, J

    M. Ludvigsen, J. Berge, M. Geoffroy, J. H. Cohen, P. R. De La Torre, S. M. Nornes, H. Singh, A. J. Sørensen, M. Daase, and G. Johnsen, Use of an autonomous surface vehicle reveals small-scale diel vertical migrations of zooplankton and suscep- tibility to light pollution under...

    2018

  5. [13]

    Fenchel, Microbial behavior in a heterogeneous world, Sci- ence296, 1068 (2002)

    T. Fenchel, Microbial behavior in a heterogeneous world, Sci- ence296, 1068 (2002)

    2002

  6. [14]

    Jékely, Evolution of phototaxis, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences364, 2795 (2009)

    G. Jékely, Evolution of phototaxis, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences364, 2795 (2009)

    2009

  7. [15]

    Noss and A

    C. Noss and A. Lorke, Direct observation of biomixing by verti- cally migrating zooplankton, Limnology and oceanography59, 724 (2014)

    2014

  8. [16]

    C. Dean, A. Soloviev, A. Hirons, T. Frank, and J. Wood, Biomixing due to diel vertical migrations of zooplankton: Com- parison of computational fluid dynamics model with observa- tions, Ocean Modelling98, 51 (2016)

    2016

  9. [17]

    Ouillon, I

    R. Ouillon, I. Houghton, J. Dabiri, and E. Meiburg, Ac- tive swimmers interacting with stratified fluids during collec- tive vertical migration, Journal of Fluid Mechanics902, A23 (2020)

    2020

  10. [18]

    Häfker, S

    N. Häfker, S. Connan-McGinty, L. Hobbs, D. McKee, J. Cohen, and K. Last, Animal behavior is central in shaping the realized diel light niche. commun. biol. 5 (1), 562 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    N. S. Häfker, G. Andreatta, A. Manzotti, A. Falciatore, F. Raible, and K. Tessmar-Raible, Rhythms and clocks in ma- 10 rine organisms, Annual Review of Marine Science15, 509 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    L. Zeng, W. Jiang, and T. J. Pedley, Sharp turns and gyrotaxis modulate surface accumulation of microorganisms, Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences119, e2206738119 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    Noto and H

    D. Noto and H. N. Ulloa, Simple tracking of occluded self- propelled organisms, Measurement Science and Technology35, 035705 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    T. J. Pedley and J. O. Kessler, Hydrodynamic phenomena in suspensions of swimming microorganisms, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics24, 313 (1992)

    1992

  15. [23]

    W. M. Durham and R. Stocker, Thin phytoplankton layers: characteristics, mechanisms, and consequences, Annual Re- view of Marine Science4, 177 (2012)

    2012

  16. [24]

    B. Chen, E. Masunaga, S. L. Smith, and H. Yamazaki, Diel vertical migration promotes zooplankton horizontal patchiness, Journal of oceanography77, 123 (2021)

    2021

  17. [25]

    Sengupta, F

    A. Sengupta, F. Carrara, and R. Stocker, Phytoplankton can ac- tively diversify their migration strategy in response to turbulent cues, Nature543, 555 (2017)

    2017

  18. [26]

    Michalec, I

    F.-G. Michalec, I. Fouxon, S. Souissi, and M. Holzner, Zoo- plankton can actively adjust their motility to turbulent flow, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences114, E11199 (2017)

    2017

  19. [27]

    I. A. Houghton, J. R. Koseff, S. G. Monismith, and J. O. Dabiri, Vertically migrating swimmers generate aggregation-scale ed- dies in a stratified column, Nature556, 497 (2018)

    2018

  20. [28]

    M. A. Bees, Advances in bioconvection, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics52, 449 (2020)

    2020

  21. [29]

    B. Wang, W. Jiang, G. Chen, L. Tao, and Z. Li, Vertical distribu- tion and longitudinal dispersion of gyrotactic microorganisms in a horizontal plane poiseuille flow, Physical Review Fluids6, 054502 (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    Perga, M

    M. Perga, M. Syarki, N. Kalinkina, and D. Bouffard, A rotiferan version of the punishment of sisyphus?, Ecology101, 1 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    S. A. Richards, H. P. Possingham, and J. Noye, Diel vertical migration: modelling light-mediated mechanisms, Journal of Plankton Research18, 2199 (1996)

    1996

  24. [32]

    Han and M

    B.-P. Han and M. Straškraba, Modeling patterns of zooplankton diel vertical migration, Journal of plankton research20, 1463 (1998)

    1998

  25. [33]

    Ji and P

    R. Ji and P. J. Franks, Vertical migration of dinoflagellates: model analysis of strategies, growth, and vertical distribution patterns, Marine Ecology Progress Series344, 49 (2007)

    2007

  26. [34]

    N. T. Ouellette, A physics perspective on collective animal be- havior, Physical Biology19, 021004 (2022)

    2022

  27. [35]

    Countryman, D

    C. Countryman, D. Steinberg, and A. Burd, Modelling the ef- fects of copepod diel vertical migration and community struc- ture on ocean carbon flux using an agent-based model, Ecolog- ical modelling470, 110003 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    Huang, F

    C. Huang, F. Ling, and E. Kanso, Collective phase transitions in confined fish schools, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences121, e2406293121 (2024)

    2024

  29. [37]

    H. Hang, C. Huang, A. Barnett, and E. Kanso, Self- reorganization and information transfer in massive schools of fish, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.05822 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Huang, C

    T. Huang, C. Yu, K. Zhang, X. Liu, J. Zhen, and L. Wang, Complex pattern dynamics and synchronization in a coupled spatiotemporal plankton system with zooplankton vertical mi- gration, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals175, 114063 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    J. R. Potts, S. V . Petrovskii, and N. A. Hill, Modelling diel vertical migration: integrating individual behaviour with population-level outcomes, Journal of Theoretical Biology513, 110574 (2021)

    2021

  32. [40]

    M. A. Bees and N. A. Hill, Linear bioconvection in a suspension of chemotactic algae, Journal of Mathematical Biology36, 295 (1998)

    1998

  33. [41]

    Arboleda, N

    E. Arboleda, N. Mora, and M. L. Cordero, Self-shading-driven bioconvection generates spontaneous convective flows in pho- totactic microalgae suspensions, Nature Physics19, 598 (2023)

    2023

  34. [42]

    J. O. Kessler, Individual and collective fluid dynamics of swim- ming cells, Journal of Fluid Mechanics173, 191 (1986)

    1986

  35. [43]

    Arrieta, M

    J. Arrieta, M. Polin, R. Saleta-Piersanti, and I. Tuval, Light con- trol of localized photobioconvection, Physical Review Letters 123, 158101 (2019)

    2019

  36. [44]

    Javadi, J

    A. Javadi, J. Arrieta, I. Tuval, and M. Polin, Photo- bioconvection: towards light control of flows in active suspen- sions, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A378, 20190523 (2020)

    2020

  37. [45]

    Vincent and N

    R. Vincent and N. Hill, Bioconvection in a suspension of pho- totactic algae, Journal of Fluid Mechanics327, 343 (1996)

    1996

  38. [46]

    Pedley and J

    T. Pedley and J. O. Kessler, A new continuum model for suspen- sions of gyrotactic micro-organisms, Journal of fluid mechanics 212, 155 (1990)

    1990

  39. [47]

    R. N. Bearon, D. Grunbaum, and R. A. Cattolico, Relating cell- level swimming behaviors to vertical population distributions in heterosigma akashiwo (raphidophyceae), a harmful alga, Lim- nology and Oceanography51, 1671 (2006)

    2006

  40. [48]

    K. Son, J. S. Guasto, and R. Stocker, Bacteria can exploit a flag- ellar buckling instability to change direction, Nature Physics9, 494 (2013)

    2013

  41. [49]

    K. C. Leptos, M. Chioccioli, S. Furlan, A. I. Pesci, and R. E. Goldstein, Phototaxis of chlamydomonas arises from a tuned adaptive photoresponse shared with multicellular volvocine green algae, Physical Review E107, 014404 (2023)

    2023

  42. [50]

    Dervaux, M

    J. Dervaux, M. Capellazzi Resta, and P. Brunet, Light- controlled flows in active fluids, Nature Physics13, 306 (2017)

    2017

  43. [51]

    Monthiller, A

    R. Monthiller, A. Loisy, M. A. Koehl, B. Favier, and C. Eloy, Surfing on turbulence: a strategy for planktonic navigation, Physical Review Letters129, 064502 (2022)

    2022

  44. [52]

    Krishnamurthy, H

    D. Krishnamurthy, H. Li, F. Benoit du Rey, P. Cambournac, A. G. Larson, E. Li, and M. Prakash, Scale-free vertical tracking microscopy, Nature Methods17, 1040 (2020)

    2020

  45. [53]

    Schuech and S

    R. Schuech and S. Menden-Deuer, Going ballistic in the plank- ton: anisotropic swimming behavior of marine protists, Limnol- ogy and Oceanography: Fluids and Environments4, 1 (2014)

    2014

  46. [54]

    Sherman and K

    K. Sherman and K. A. Honey, Vertical movements of zooplank- ton during a solar eclipse, Nature227, 1156 (1970)

    1970

  47. [55]

    K. S. Last, L. Hobbs, J. Berge, A. S. Brierley, and F. Cot- tier, Moonlight drives ocean-scale mass vertical migration of zooplankton during the arctic winter, Current Biology26, 244 (2016)

    2016

  48. [56]

    Desai and A

    N. Desai and A. M. Ardekani, Modeling of active swimmer sus- pensions and their interactions with the environment, Soft Mat- ter13, 6033 (2017)

    2017

  49. [57]

    Bianchi and K

    D. Bianchi and K. Mislan, Global patterns of diel vertical mi- gration times and velocities from acoustic data, Limnology and Oceanography61, 353 (2016)

    2016

  50. [58]

    G. J. Thorn and R. N. Bearon, Transport of spherical gyrotactic organisms in general three-dimensional flow fields, Physics of fluids22(2010)

    2010

  51. [59]

    Vladimirov, M

    V . Vladimirov, M. Wu, T. Pedley, P. Denissenko, and S. Za- khidova, Measurement of cell velocity distributions in popula- tions of motile algae, Journal of experimental biology207, 1203 (2004)

    2004

  52. [60]

    Lorke, D

    A. Lorke, D. F. McGinnis, P. Spaak, and A. Wüest, Acoustic observations of zooplankton in lakes using a doppler current 11 profiler, Freshwater Biology49, 1280 (2004)

    2004

  53. [61]

    H. R. Cheslack,Diel vertical migration and frontal variability of acoustic backscatter in the Balearic Sea, Ph.D. thesis, Mas- sachusetts Institute of Technology (2023)

    2023

  54. [62]

    Piton, R

    V . Piton, R. Reiss, U. Lemmin, O. Anneville, G. Many, J. Keller, V . Kindschi, H. K. Wynn, S. Rasconi, L. Laine, et al., Identifying and quantifying unexpected deep zooplank- ton diel vertical migration in a large deep lake, Limnology and Oceanography70, 259 (2025)

    2025

  55. [63]

    Bianchi, E

    D. Bianchi, E. D. Galbraith, D. A. Carozza, K. Mislan, and C. A. Stock, Intensification of open-ocean oxygen depletion by vertically migrating animals, Nature Geoscience6, 545 (2013)

    2013

  56. [64]

    Andersen and P

    V . Andersen and P. Nival, A model of the diel vertical migration of zooplankton based on euphausiids, (1991)

    1991

  57. [65]

    Noss and A

    C. Noss and A. Lorke, Zooplankton induced currents and fluxes in stratified waters, Water Quality Research Journal of Canada 47, 276 (2012)

    2012

  58. [66]

    Mohebbi, J

    N. Mohebbi, J. Hwang, M. K. Fu, and J. O. Dabiri, Measure- ments and modelling of induced flow in collective vertical mi- gration, Journal of Fluid Mechanics1001, A50 (2024)

    2024

  59. [67]

    Zheng, A

    B. Zheng, A. J. Lucas, P. J. Franks, T. L. Schlosser, C. R. Anderson, U. Send, K. Davis, A. D. Barton, and H. M. Sosik, Dinoflagellate vertical migration fuels an intense red tide, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences120, e2304590120 (2023)

    2023

  60. [68]

    Obertegger, G

    U. Obertegger, G. Flaim, and R. Sommaruga, Multifactorial na- ture of rotifer water layer preferences in an oligotrophic lake, Journal of plankton research30, 633 (2008)

    2008

  61. [69]

    De Lillo, M

    F. De Lillo, M. Cencini, W. M. Durham, M. Barry, R. Stocker, E. Climent, and G. Boffetta, Turbulent fluid acceleration gen- erates clusters of gyrotactic microorganisms, Physical review letters112, 044502 (2014)

    2014

  62. [70]

    G. Li, Z. Gong, W. Jiang, J. Zhan, B. Wang, X. Fu, M. Xu, and Z. Wu, Environmental transport of gyrotactic microorgan- isms in an open-channel flow, Water Resources Research59, e2022WR033229 (2023)

    2023

  63. [71]

    Z. Wu, L. Zeng, G. Li, Z. Gong, J. Zhan, W. Jiang, M. Xu, and X. Fu, Onset for active swimming of microorganisms to shape their transport in turbulent open channel flows, Water Resources Research60, e2024WR037586 (2024)

    2024

  64. [72]

    B. Wang, W. Jiang, and G. Chen, Gyrotactic trapping of micro- swimmers in simple shear flows: a study directly from the fun- damental smoluchowski equation, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 939, A37 (2022)

    2022

  65. [73]

    M. S. Hoecker-Martínez and W. D. Smyth, Trapping of gyro- tactic organisms in an unstable shear layer, Continental Shelf Research36, 8 (2012)

    2012

  66. [74]

    J. M. Sullivan, P. L. Donaghay, and J. E. Rines, Coastal thin layer dynamics: consequences to biology and optics, Continen- tal shelf research30, 50 (2010)

    2010

  67. [75]

    Walsby and F

    A. Walsby and F. Schanz, Light-dependent growth rate deter- mines changes in the population of planktothrix rubescens over the annual cycle in lake zürich, switzerland, New Phytologist 154, 671 (2002)

    2002

  68. [76]

    Ratnarajah, R

    L. Ratnarajah, R. Abu-Alhaija, A. Atkinson, S. Batten, N. J. Bax, K. S. Bernard, G. Canonico, A. Cornils, J. D. Everett, M. Grigoratou,et al., Monitoring and modelling marine zoo- plankton in a changing climate, Nature Communications14, 564 (2023)

    2023

  69. [77]

    S. I. Dodson, S. Ryan, R. Tollrian, and W. Lampert, Individ- ual swimming behavior of daphnia: effects of food, light and container size in four clones, Journal of Plankton Research19, 1537 (1997)

    1997

  70. [78]

    CO’Keefe, M

    T. CO’Keefe, M. C. Brewer, and S. I. Dodson, Swimming be- havior of daphnia: its role in determining predation risk, Journal of Plankton Research20, 973 (1998)

    1998

  71. [79]

    M. M. Wilhelmus and J. O. Dabiri, Observations of large-scale fluid transport by laser-guided plankton aggregations, Physics of Fluids26(2014)

    2014

  72. [80]

    Gorgues, O

    T. Gorgues, O. Aumont, and L. Memery, Simulated changes in the particulate carbon export efficiency due to diel vertical migration of zooplankton in the north atlantic, Geophysical Re- search Letters46, 5387 (2019)

    2019

  73. [81]

    W. M. Durham, J. O. Kessler, and R. Stocker, Disruption of ver- tical motility by shear triggers formation of thin phytoplankton layers, science323, 1067 (2009)

    2009

  74. [82]

    Escaping from light — a circadian migration of active matter in aquatic systems

    N. Mousavi, J. Qiu, B. Mehlig, L. Zhao, and K. Gustavsson, Ef- ficient survival strategy for zooplankton in turbulence, Physical Review Research6, L022034 (2024). Acknowledgments F.G.-L. and J.M were supported by Fondecyt Iniciación No. 11220683. This research was partially su...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.