Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 42 references

Effect of Berry connection on attosecond transient absorption spectroscopy in gapped graphene

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Opening a gap in graphene makes the attosecond transient absorption spectrum acquire a component at the pump-laser frequency, and this paper attributes that component to the Berry connection.

desk verdict Interesting prediction of a 1ω ATAS component in gapped graphene, but the Berry-connection attribution rests on a gauge-dependent subtraction that needs a fix. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.19286 v2 pith:CRYFMXMI submitted 2025-06-24 cond-mat.mes-hall physics.atom-ph

Jiayu Yan , Hongxuan Er , Wei Dang , Jiahuan Ren , Chao Chen , Dianxiang Ren , Fulong Dong This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.atom-ph
keywords Berryconnectionattosecondtransientabsorptionspectroscopygappedgraphenefour-banddensitymatrixfundamental-frequencyspectralcomponentdynamicalFranz-KeldysheffectfishbonestructurevanHovesingularities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that in gapped graphene the fishbone-shaped attosecond transient absorption spectrum contains a spectral component oscillating at the pump-laser frequency, and that this component is a direct fingerprint of the Berry connection. In pristine graphene the same spectra oscillate at twice the pump frequency, so the appearance of the fundamental frequency marks broken inversion symmetry. The authors isolate the effect by subtracting a reference calculation in which the diagonal intraband dipoles are set to zero, leaving a difference spectrum $\Delta S_A$ that they attribute to the Berry connection. A simplified five-electron model then gives an analytical expression whose Bessel-function terms reproduce the numerical spectra and explain why the fundamental component is strong near the M points but suppressed near the K points. The paper concludes that the intensity of this fundamental-frequency component encodes both the Berry connection and the energy shift of the van Hove singularities.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the four-band density-matrix equation (Eq. 1) for the bands $\{g_1,g_2,v,c\}$, together with the Berry-connection difference $\mathbf{A}(k)=D^c_c-D^g_g$ and an artificial reference spectrum $S_{A=0}$ computed with $D_{cc}$, $D_{vv}$, $D_{g_1g_1}$, and $D_{g_2g_2}$ set to zero. The difference $\Delta S_A=S-S_{A=0}$ is meant to isolate the Berry-connection contribution. The analytic core is the simplified-model formula of Eq. (5): $\Delta S_A^k$ is a sum of Lorentzian and Fano lines at shifted energies $E=\varepsilon_{cg}(k)+\xi(k)$, with $\xi(k)=A_{I0}^2\nabla_{k_x}^2\varepsilon_{cg}(k)/4$, multiplied by Bessel functions $J_n(b)$ where $b=A_x(k)E_{I0}/\omega_I$. These Bessel weights set which harmonics of the pump period appear and govern the constructive or destructive interference across the nonequivalent M and K points.

What would settle it

Run the same four-band calculation for two models with identical band dispersions $\varepsilon_{cg}(k)$ and interband dipoles $D_{cg}$ but different Berry connections $\mathbf{A}(k)$, achieved by changing hopping phases or the sublattice asymmetry while holding the dispersion fixed. If the $N=1$ components of $\Delta S_A(\omega,t_d)$ follow the change in $\mathbf{A}(k)$, the attribution is confirmed; if the fundamental component is unchanged, the signal comes from something else that the zeroing procedure removes. A second check is to measure the integrated M-point fundamental yield versus gap size and compare it with the destructive-interference prediction of Eq. (5).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central discovery is that a gap in graphene qualitatively changes the time-delay dependence of the ATAS: the M-point spectral branches acquire a component at the pump frequency $\omega_I$, beside the usual zero- and $2\omega_I$-frequency components. This component is traced to the Berry connection $\mathbf{A}(k)=D^c_c-D^g_g$ between the conduction band and the core bands. The analytical expression for the isolated Berry-connection spectrum, Eq. (5), expresses $\Delta S_A$ as sums of Lorentzian and Fano line shapes centered at $E=\varepsilon_{cg}(k)+\xi(k)$, weighted by Bessel functions $J_n(b)$ with $b=A_x(k)E_{I0}/\omega_I$; the $n=1$ terms are the fundamental-frequency signal and the $n=2$ terms are the second harmonic. Interference among the three inequivalent M-point electrons determines whether the fundamental survives, and the near-cancellation at K points follows from opposite signs of the corresponding $J_1$ values. The conclusion is that the fundamental-frequency spectral component is a Berry-connection-induced signal, modulated by the effective-mass energy shift $\xi(k)$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that setting $D_{cc}$, $D_{vv}$, $D_{g_1g_1}$, and $D_{g_2g_2}$ to zero removes the Berry connection and nothing else; if that artificial zeroing also removes the energy shift $\xi(k)$ or other intraband dynamics, the difference spectrum $\Delta S_A$ does not isolate the Berry connection alone.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The fundamental-frequency component offers an all-optical, time-domain signature of the Berry connection in gapped graphene, readable directly from the delay dependence of the absorption spectrum.
  • The energy-frequency map at $N=1$ can be used to extract the momentum-resolved Berry connection near the M points, if the band dispersion and effective masses are known independently.
  • Because the fundamental component survives at M-point branches and is suppressed at K points, experiments should target the M-point spectral branches to observe the Berry-connection signal.
  • Since the zero- and $2\omega_I$ components are reduced in $\Delta S_A$ while the fundamental is not, the Berry-connection signal can be seen even where the dynamical Franz-Keldysh background is strong.
  • Raising the gap $\Delta_g$ is predicted to decrease the integrated fundamental yield at the M points, giving a quantitative trend that can be tested by varying the gap.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same subtraction logic should apply to any inversion-broken crystal, so the appearance of a fundamental-frequency component in ATAS is plausibly a general Berry-connection diagnostic, not a graphene-specific effect; the paper itself only demonstrates gapped graphene.
  • Because the energy shift $\xi(k)$ enters through the same intraband coupling that carries $\mathbf{A}(k)$, a clean experimental separation of 'Berry connection' from 'effective-mass shift' would require a material in which the gap can be tuned without changing the dispersion curvature, a test the paper does not perform.
  • Replacing the $\delta$-function X-ray approximation with a finite probe-pulse envelope should produce small corrections to the $J_n(b)$ weights, so a comparison against the analytical formula could map out where the simplified model's assumptions break down.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates attosecond transient absorption spectroscopy (ATAS) in gapped graphene by numerically solving four-band density matrix equations. The central claim is that, in contrast to pristine graphene whose fishbone spectra oscillate at twice the pump frequency, gapped graphene exhibits an additional spectral component oscillating at the pump frequency, induced by the Berry connection. To support this, the authors define a difference spectrum ΔS_A by artificially setting diagonal dipole matrix elements to zero, and they derive an analytical expression in a simplified model containing selected M- and K-point electrons. The analytical expression qualitatively reproduces the numerical results, and the paper further studies how the fundamental-frequency component depends on the band gap.

Significance. If the attribution is correct, the work identifies a new all-optical signature of the Berry connection in symmetry-broken materials and extends the dynamical Franz-Keldysh theory of graphene ATAS. The numerical simulations use a standard density-matrix approach, and the analytical expression is derived from the same model with parameters computed from the band structure rather than fitted to the spectral features; the predicted gap dependence is falsifiable. However, the central diagnostic ΔS_A is gauge-dependent as defined, and the subtraction may not cleanly isolate the Berry connection from other intraband dynamics. These issues must be resolved before the attribution can be regarded as established.

major comments (2)
  1. [II.B, Eq. (3b)] The reference spectrum S_{A=0} defined by setting D_cc, D_vv, D_g1g1, and D_g2g2 to zero is not gauge invariant. Under independent U(1) phase rotations of the Bloch states, D_nn transforms as D_nn → D_nn − ∇_k β_n(k); the assertion in Sec. II.B that A^cg = D_cc − D_gg is gauge invariant applies only to a common phase rotation of bands c and g, not to the operation of zeroing each D_nn separately. Consequently, ΔS_A in Eq. (3b) and the extracted fundamental-frequency component are gauge-dependent constructs, and the central attribution of this component to the Berry connection is not well-posed as stated. Please either define a gauge-invariant Berry-connection contribution (e.g., via the full paramagnetic current operator) or demonstrate numerically that the 1ω feature persists under several admissible Bloch gauges.
  2. [III.A, Eq. (5)] Equation (5) is obtained by subtracting the A=0 response from the full response, but the subtraction does not cleanly remove the intraband dynamics associated with the k_t dependence of the band energy. The phase Φ0 = ∫ ε_cg(k+A(t'))dt' contains a first-order velocity term ∇ε·A(t) and the energy shift ξ(k); these are identical in S and S_{A=0}, yet sin(Φ0+φ_B)−sin(Φ0) contains cross terms between Φ0 and the Berry phase φ_B that contribute at 1ω when ∇ε≠0. In the simplified model the selected M and K points have ∇ε=0, which sidesteps the issue, but the full numerical ΔS_A in Sec. II.C integrates over the whole Brillouin zone. To support the claim that the FFSC is governed by the Berry connection, please report the 1ω component of S_{A=0} itself, or otherwise show that the velocity-induced 1ω contribution is negligible in the full model; otherwise the subtraction does not isolate the Berry connection.
minor comments (4)
  1. [III.A, Eq. (5)] The derivation of Eq. (5) is only sketched in the main text; please include a brief outline of the Bessel-function expansion and define the quantities L, F, b, and ξ in the main text rather than only in the Supplemental Material.
  2. [III.A] The sentence immediately before Eq. (5) refers to 'the effect of the Berry curvature on ATAS', which is inconsistent with the rest of the paper that works with the Berry connection; please correct the terminology.
  3. [Figs. 2(e)-2(h), 3, 4] The color scales in these figures are not defined, and the normalization is not stated; since the comparison between the full and simplified models is qualitative, explicit color bars and normalization statements would help the reader judge the agreement.
  4. [Sec. III.B] The numerical values of the parameters b for the five electrons in the simplified model are only given in the Supplemental Material; because the sign and magnitude of b drive the interference analysis, the main text should at least list these values.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Berry-connection parameters are computed from the band structure, and the analytical expression is derived rather than fitted to the target spectra.

full rationale

The central analytical result, Eq. (5), is obtained by expanding the intraband phase in the four-band density-matrix equations; the parameter b is computed directly from the tight-binding Berry-connection difference A_x(k)=D_cc-D_gg and the known laser amplitude/frequency, not adjusted to reproduce the 1ω feature. The A=0 control in Eq. (3b) is a counterfactual definition of the Berry-connection contribution, and the resulting subtraction leaves the J1(b) sidebands that constitute the fundamental-frequency component; this is a controlled derivation rather than a fitted prediction. The numerical and analytical calculations are both based on the same model, so their mutual agreement is an internal consistency check, not an independent validation, but no load-bearing step reduces to its own input. The gauge-dependence of setting D_nn to zero is a physical-validity concern about whether the subtraction isolates the Berry connection cleanly, not a circularity. The use of Ref. [26] for the four-band density-matrix method is a normal citation to prior work by one of the authors and does not carry a uniqueness claim or an unverified premise.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities and performs no parameter fitting to data. Inputs such as the hopping energy γ0, the dephasing rate Γ0 and the core-level position εg come from prior literature or are chosen as representative values. The central analysis relies on standard semiclassical, dipole-approximation and perturbative methods. The main modeling choices are the four-band tight-binding Hamiltonian and the simplified five-point sampling of the Brillouin zone.

free parameters (2)
  • band gap Δg = 0.15 a.u. (varied up to ~0.5 a.u. in Fig. 5)
    Chosen as a representative symmetry-broken gap; the paper scans it but does not fit it to data.
  • dephasing rate Γ0 = 0.004 a.u.
    Taken from Ref. [25], not fitted here.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Nearest-neighbor tight-binding model with γ0 = 0.1 a.u. and core bands at εg = -280 eV describes gapped graphene in the relevant energy window.
    Used to construct the four-band Hamiltonian in Sec. II A; the X-ray at 280 eV is assumed to couple only to the g1/g2 to c transitions.
  • domain assumption Dipole approximation and the four-band density matrix equations (Eq. 1) capture the ATAS dynamics.
    Standard framework in ATAS theory; used throughout Section II B.
  • domain assumption The X-ray pulse can be treated as a delta function for the analytical derivation.
    Sec. III A: 'it can be approximated to a δ function E_X(t) = A_X δ(t)'; justified by the short 80 as pulse compared with the 10 fs IR period.
  • domain assumption Perturbative treatment of the X-ray excitation (first order in A_X) and neglect of X-ray-IR coupling after t=0.
    Sec. III A: change in density matrix at t=0+ is linear in A_X; subsequent evolution is IR-dominated.
  • domain assumption The simplified model with 3 M-point and 2 K-point electrons is representative of the full Brillouin zone.
    Sec. II D: the simplified model qualitatively reproduces the full-model spectra; this is an approximation for analytical insight.
  • standard math The difference A^kg_c = D^kk_cc - D^kk_gg is gauge invariant in the four-band model.
    Stated in Sec. II B; this property is necessary for the physical interpretation of the control calculation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Effect of Berry connection on attosecond transient absorption spectroscopy in gapped graphene." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CRYFMXMI

@misc{pith2026250619286,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Effect of Berry connection on attosecond transient absorption spectroscopy in gapped graphene},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CRYFMXMI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.19286}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate the attosecond transient absorption spectroscopy (ATAS) in gapped graphene by numerically solving the four-band density matrix equations. Our results reveal that, in contrast to pristine graphene, whose fishbone-shaped spectra oscillate at twice the pump laser frequency, the ATAS of gapped graphene exhibits an additional component oscillating at the pump laser frequency, induced by the Berry connection. To gain insight into these interesting results, we employ a simplified model to derive an analytical expression for the spectral component stemming from the Berry connection. Our analytical results qualitatively reproduce the key features observed in the numerical simulations, revealing that the intensity of the fundamental-frequency spectral component depends not only on the Berry connection but also on the energy shifts associated with the effective mass of electrons at the van Hove singularities. These results shed light on the complex generation mechanism of the ATAS in symmetry-broken materials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.19286 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Hexagonal lattice structure of two-dimension [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) ATAS of pristine graphene as a function of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Analytical ∆S A kM1 (ω, td) calculated by Eq. (5) for the electron located at M1 point. (b) Same as (a), but for the M2 point. (c) Total analytical spectra ∆S A kM = ∆S A kM1 + ∆S A kM2 +∆S A kM3 . (d) Frequency-energy map corresponding to the results in (c). The dashed rectangle (or dotted rectangle) marks the spectrum arising from the transition channel g1 → c (or g2 → c). ergy of fishbone structures is E M1 c… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Analytical spectra ∆S A kK1 (ω, td) calculated by Eq. (5). (b) Analytical spectra ∆S A kK2 (ω, td). (c) Total analytical spectra ∆S A kK = ∆S A kK1 + ∆S A kK2 . (d) Frequency￾energy map corresponding to the total spectra in (c). The dashed rectangle (or dotted rect…

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Analytical results of the fishbone structure induced by th e Berry connection for the M-point electrons Figures 3(a), 3(b) and 3(c) present the analytical spec- tra ∆ SA kM1 , ∆ SA kM2 , and ∆ SA kM = ∆ SA kM1 + ∆ SA kM2 + ∆SA kM3 , respectively, calculated using Eq. (5). These spectra consist of two fishbone structures arising from the electron transition ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Figures 4(a) and 4(b) display the analytical spectra ∆ SA kK1 and ∆ SA kK2 , respectively

    Analytical results of fishbone structure induced by the Berry connection for the K-point electrons Next, we turn our attention to the fishbone struc- tures related to the K-point electrons. Figures 4(a) and 4(b) display the analytical spectra ∆ SA kK1 and ∆ SA kK2 , respectively. Corresponding to the transition channel g2 → c, the spectral oscillation frequ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Discussion about the dependence of the fundamental frequency components of the ATAS on the energy gap From the above discussions, it can be concluded that for the spectra related to the M-point electrons, the in- tensity of FFSC depends not only on the value of Berry connections but also on the shift energy ξ(kM2). In the following, we investigate how the...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Goulielmakis, Zhi-Heng Loh, A

    E. Goulielmakis, Zhi-Heng Loh, A. Wirth, R. Santra, N. Rohringer, V. S. Yakovlev, S. Zherebtsov, T. Pfeifer, A. M. Azzeer, M. F. Kling, S. R. Leone, and F. Krausz, Real- time observation of valence electron motion, Nature 466, 739 (2010)

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    M. B. Gaarde, C. Buth, J. L. Tate, and K. J. Schafer, Transient absorption and reshaping of ultrafast XUV light by laser-dressed helium, Phys. Rev. A 83, 013419 (2011)

    work page 2011

  6. [6]

    A. R. Beck, D. M. Neumark, and S. R. Leone, Probing ultrafast dynamics with attosecond transient absorption, Chem. Phys. Lett. 624, 119 (2015)

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    M. Wu, S. Chen, S. Camp, K. J. Schafer, and M. B. Gaarde, Theory of strong-field attosecond transient ab- sorption, J. Phys. B 49, 062003 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    H. Wang, M. Chini, S. Chen, C.-H. Zhang, F. He, Y. Cheng, Y. Wu, U. Thumm, and Z. Chang, attosecond time-resolved autoionization of Argon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 143002 (2010)

    work page 2010

Show all 42 references
  1. [9]

    Holler, F

    M. Holler, F. Schapper, L. Gallmann, and U. Keller, Attosecond electron wave-packet interference observed by transient absorption, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 123601 (2011)

    2011

  2. [10]

    Chini, B

    M. Chini, B. Zhao, H. Wang, Y. Cheng, S. X. Hu, and Z. Chang, Subcycle ac Stark shift of Helium excited states probed with isolated attosecond pulses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 073601 (2012)

    2012

  3. [11]

    S. Chen, M. Wu, M. B. Gaarde, and K. J. Schafer, Quan- tum interference in attosecond transient absorption of laser-dressed helium atoms, Phys. Rev. A 87, 033408 (2013)

    2013

  4. [12]

    Z. Q. Yang, D. F. Ye, T. Ding, T. Pfeifer, and L. B. Fu, Attosecond XUV absorption spectroscopy of doubly ex- cited states in helium atoms dressed by a time-delayed femtosecond infrared laser, Phys. Rev. A 91, 013414 (2015)

    2015

  5. [13]

    P. Peng, C. Marceau, M. Herv´ e, P. B. Corkum, A. Y. Naumov, and D. M. Villeneuve, Symmetry of molecu- lar Rydberg states revealed by XUV transient absorption spectroscopy, Nat. Commun. 10, 5269 (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    P. Peng, Y. Mi, M. Lytova, M. Britton, X. Ding, A. Y. Naumov, P. B. Corkum, and D. M. Villeneuve, Coherent control of ultrafast extreme ultraviolet transient absorp - tion, Nat. Photonics 16, 45 (2022)

    2022

  7. [15]

    Kaldun, A

    A. Kaldun, A. Bl¨attermann, V. Stooß, S. Donsa, H. Wei, R. Pazourek, S. Nagele, C. Ott, C. D. Lin, J. Burgd¨ orfer, and T. Pfeifer, Observing the ultrafast buildup of a Fano resonance in the time domain, Science 354, 738 (2016)

    2016

  8. [16]

    Baker, J

    S. Baker, J. S. Robinson, C. A. Haworth, H. Teng, R. A. Smith, C. C. Chirilˇa, M. Lein, J. W. G. Tisch, and J. P. Marangos, Probing proton dynamics in molecules on an attosecond time scale, Science 312, 424, (2006)

    2006

  9. [17]

    D. T. Matselyukh, V. Despr´ e, N. V. Golubev, A. I. Kuleff, and H. J. W¨ orner, Decoherence and revival in attosecond charge migration driven by non-adiabatic dynamics, Nat. Phys. 18, 1206 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    Severino, K

    S. Severino, K. M. Ziems, M. Reduzzi, A. Summers, H. W. Sun, Y. H. Chien, S. Gr¨ afe, and J. Biegert, Attosec- ond core −level absorption spectroscopy reveals the elec- tronic and nuclear dynamics of molecular ring opening, Nat. Photonics 18, 731 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    Schultze, K

    M. Schultze, K. Ramasesha, C. D. Pemmaraju, S. A. Sato, D. Whitmore, A. Gandman, J. S. Prell, L. J. Borja, 8 D. Prendergast, and K. Yabana, Attosecond band-gap dynamics in silicon, Science 346, 1348 (2014)

    2014

  12. [20]

    Lucchini, S

    M. Lucchini, S. A. Sato, A. Ludwig, J. Herrmann, M. Volkov, L. Kasmi, Y. Shinohara, K. Yabana, L. Gallmann, and U. Keller, Attosecond dynamical Franz- Keldysh effect in polycrystalline diamond, Science 353, 916 (2016)

    2016

  13. [21]

    Schlaepfer, M

    F. Schlaepfer, M. Lucchini, S. A. Sato, M. Volkov, L. Kasmi, N. Hartmann, A. Rubio, L. Gallmann, and U. Keller, Attosecond optical-field-enhanced carrier injec- tion into the GaAs conduction band, Nat. Phys. 14, 560 (2018)

    2018

  14. [22]

    Volkov, S

    M. Volkov, S. A. Sato, F. Schlaepfer, L. Kasmi, N. Hart- mann, M. Lucchini, L. Gallmann, A. Rubio, and U. Keller, Attosecond screening dynamics mediated by elec- tron localization in transition metals, Nat. Phys. 15, 1145 (2019)

    2019

  15. [23]

    Otobe, Attosecond electro-optic effect in zinc sulfid e induced by a laser field, Phys

    T. Otobe, Attosecond electro-optic effect in zinc sulfid e induced by a laser field, Phys. Rev. A 100, 033401 (2019)

    2019

  16. [24]

    Lucchini, S

    M. Lucchini, S. A. Sato, G. D. Lucarelli, B. Moio, G. Inzani, R. Borrego-Varillas, F. Frassetto, L. Poletto, H. H¨ ubener, U. De Giovannini, A. Rubio, and M. Nisoli, Unravelling the intertwined atomic and bulk nature of localised excitons by attosecond spectroscopy, Nat. Com- ...

    2020

  17. [25]

    Mashiko, Y

    H. Mashiko, Y. Chisuga, I. Katayama, K. Oguri, H. Ma- suda, J. Takeda, and H. Gotoh, Multi −petahertz elec- tron interference in Cr:Al 2O3 solid−state material, Nat. Commun. 9, 1468 (2018)

    2018

  18. [26]

    Mashiko, K

    H. Mashiko, K. Oguri, T. Yamaguchi, A. Suda, and H. Gotoh, Petahertz optical drive with wide −bandgap semi- conductor, Nat. Phys. 12, 741 (2018)

    2018

  19. [27]

    Uchida, T

    K. Uchida, T. Otobe, T. Mochizuki, C. Kim, M. Yoshita, H. Akiyama, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. West, K. Tanaka, and H. Hirori, Subcycle Optical Response Caused by a Tera- hertz Dressed State with Phase-Locked Wave Functions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 277402 (2016)

    2016

  20. [28]

    Cistaro, L

    G. Cistaro, L. Plaja, F. Mart ´ ın, and A. Pic´ on, Attosec - ond x-ray transient absorption spectroscopy in graphene, Phys. Rev. Research 3, 013144 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    Dong, and J

    F. Dong, and J. Liu, Fishbone resonance structure in the attosecond transient absorption spectrum of graphene, Phys. Rev. A 106, 063107 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    Otobe, Y

    T. Otobe, Y. Shinohara, S. A. Sato, and K. Yabana, Fem- tosecond time-resolved dynamical Franz-Keldysh effect, Phys. Rev. B 93, 045124 (2016)

    2016

  23. [31]

    Yamada, and K

    S. Yamada, and K. Yabana, Symmetry properties of at- tosecond transient absorption spectroscopy in crystallin e dielectrics, Phys. Rev. B 101, 165128 (2020)

    2020

  24. [32]

    Volkov, S

    M. Volkov, S. A. Sato, A. Niedermayr, A. Rubio, L. Gall- mann, and U. Keller, Floquet-Bloch resonances in near- petahertz electroabsorption spectroscopy of SiO 2, Phys. Rev. B 107, 184304 (2023)

    2023

  25. [33]

    Yamada, K

    S. Yamada, K. Yabana, and T. Otobe, Subcycle control of valley-selective excitations via the dynamical Franz- Keldysh effect in a WSe 2 monolayer, Phys. Rev. B 108, 035404 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    Kim, Ultrafast transient absorption spectroscopy o f strongly correlated Mott insulators, Phys

    Y. Kim, Ultrafast transient absorption spectroscopy o f strongly correlated Mott insulators, Phys. Rev. B 108, 035122 (2023)

    2023

  27. [35]

    D. Xiao, M. C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1959 (2010)

    2010

  28. [36]

    Nagaosa, J

    N. Nagaosa, J. Sinova, S. Onoda, A. H. MacDonald, and N. P. Ong, Anomalous Hall effect, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1539 (2010)

    2010

  29. [37]

    X. L. Qi, and S. C. Zhang, Topological insulators and superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011)

    2011

  30. [38]

    Sun, and A

    Z. Sun, and A. J. Millis, Topological Charge Pumping in Excitonic Insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 027601 (2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    S. A. O. Motlagh, F. Nematollahi, V. Apalkov, and M. I. Stockman, Topological resonance and single-optical- cycle valley polarization in gapped graphene, Phys. Rev. B 100, 115431 (2019)

    2019

  32. [40]

    M. Yu, H. Du, J. Tan, K. Liu, P. Lu, and Y. Zhou, Prob- ing field-driven electron dynamics of gapped graphene by intensity-dependent valley polarization, Phys. Rev. A 109, 063106 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    Pakdel, and M

    F. Pakdel, and M. A. Maleki, Confinement of Dirac fermions in gapped graphene, Sci. Rep. 14, 14512 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    A. H. C. Neto, F. Guinea, N. M. R. Peres, K. S. Novoselov, and A. K. Geim, The electronic properties of graphene, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 109 (2009). [†] 202310011@xttc.edu.cn [*] fldonghb@126.com

    2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.