Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 49 references

Scalable entangling gates on ion qubits via structured light addressing

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Hermite-Gaussian light lets individual ion qubits entangle through sparse axial motion, reaching around 0.97 fidelity without pulse shaping.

desk verdict A genuinely new axial-mode addressing scheme with credible small-scale data, but the title's scalability claim is extrapolated from six ions, not demonstrated. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.19535 v1 pith:77555XRS submitted 2025-06-24 quant-ph physics.atom-phphysics.optics

Xueying Mai , Liyun Zhang , Qinyang Yu , Junhua Zhang , Yao Lu This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phphysics.atom-phphysics.optics
keywords trappedionsHermite-GaussianbeamsstructuredlightMølmer-Sørensengateaxialmotionalmodesindividualaddressingionchainquantumentanglement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the transverse gradient of a Hermite-Gaussian (HG01) addressing beam can couple an individually addressed ion qubit to the axial collective motion of a trapped-ion chain. Because axial motional spectra are sparser than radial ones, a single axial mode can serve as the entanglement mediator, removing the need for intricate pulse shaping that radial-mode gates require. The authors demonstrate addressable two-qubit entangling gates in chains of two to six ytterbium ions, with Bell-state fidelities around 0.97 when a low-heating breathing mode mediates the gate. The significance is that control complexity no longer grows with chain length through mode crowding, which is the main obstacle the paper targets for scalable trapped-ion processors.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the HG01 Hermite-Gaussian mode: a beam whose intensity profile has a dark central slit and two symmetric lobes, giving a steep transverse amplitude gradient at the slit. Aligning the slit perpendicular to the ion chain makes the gradient point along the axial direction, so the qubit-motion coupling Hamiltonian $H = \Omega_{\mathrm{sdf}} \sigma_x (a_{\mathrm{ax}} e^{-i\delta t} + a_{\mathrm{ax}}^\dagger e^{i\delta t})$ is maximized at the slit while the field amplitude is zero, suppressing off-resonant carrier drive. The same beam's amplitude maxima provide single-qubit carrier rotations, so one addressing system covers both single- and two-qubit gates. A $0{-}\pi$ phase plate generates the approximate HG01 mode used in the experiment.

What would settle it

Measure the axial motional spectrum of a twenty-ion chain: if the frequency gap between the chosen mediator mode and its nearest axial neighbor falls to the order of the gate detuning (about 10 kHz) or below, or if a constant-amplitude XX(π/4) gate on the outermost pair shows fidelity falling with chain length beyond the heating trend, the scalability claim is refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery, stated on the paper's own terms, is that placing an ion at the dark slit of a focused HG01 beam produces a state-dependent force along the chain axis through the beam's transverse field gradient, even though the beam propagates perpendicular to the chain. This makes sparse axial motional modes accessible to individual addressing, which conventional Gaussian-beam addressing cannot do. The authors use this coupling to implement Mølmer-Sørensen entangling gates mediated by a single isolated axial mode, achieving Bell-state fidelities of 0.952(3) to 0.960(3) in two- and three-ion chains using the center-of-mass mode, and consistently near 0.97 in chains up to six ions when the breathing mode is used. They attribute residual error mainly to laser dephasing and motional heating, not to spectator-mode crosstalk.

Load-bearing premise

The central scalability premise is that axial motional modes remain sparse enough in much longer chains that a single mode can still be isolated as the entanglement mediator without pulse shaping; the paper verifies this only for chains up to six ions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Two-qubit gates on arbitrary ion pairs can be run with constant-amplitude bichromatic light, with no pulse shaping, at least up to six ions.
  • The error budget puts spectator-mode contributions below $10^{-6}$, so mode crowding is not the limiting factor at demonstrated chain lengths.
  • Using low-heating higher-order axial modes such as the breathing mode keeps Bell fidelity near 0.97 as the chain grows from two to six ions.
  • The same addressing concept transfers to hyperfine qubits by shaping one Raman beam into HG01, and co-propagating both Raman beams would suppress optical path noise.
  • Different ion pairs can in principle be entangled in parallel by assigning different axial motional modes to different addressing beams.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If axial spectra stay sparse at fifty to one hundred ions as the introduction asserts, this scheme would sidestep the pulse-shaping overhead that currently grows with radial-mode crowding; a direct check is measuring axial-mode spacing and gate fidelity for a twenty-ion chain.
  • The six-ion center-of-mass fidelity drop to 0.856 is tied to heating; the breathing-mode result implies cryogenic cooling or heating-resilient control could restore COM-mode performance at longer chains.
  • The roughly 1.5% gradient crosstalk from the 0-π phase plate is an engineering artifact; higher-purity mode generation should improve nearest-neighbor gate fidelities and reduce the observed adjacent-pair entanglement.
  • The gradient-coupling mechanism may generalize to other structured beams, enabling dispersive qubit-motion couplings or continuous-variable operations, though the paper only gestures at these possibilities.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports an experimental trapped-ion processor in which individual addressing is performed with Hermite-Gaussian (HG01) beams whose transverse field gradient couples to the axial motion of the ion chain. The authors show that placing ions at the dark slit of the HG01 mode maximizes the state-dependent force, demonstrate ground-state cooling and coherent sideband operations on a single ion, and implement Mølmer-Sørensen-type two-qubit entangling gates on chains of two to six 171Yb+ ions. Using the axial center-of-mass mode, they report Bell-state fidelities between 0.856 and 0.960 depending on chain length; using the breathing mode, fidelities remain around 0.97 up to six ions. The central claim is that the sparse axial mode spectrum allows single-mode isolation without complex pulse shaping, which would reduce control overhead compared to radial-mode gates in long chains.

Significance. If the scalability claim holds, the work provides an experimentally demonstrated alternative to radial-mode entangling gates in long ion chains, with constant-amplitude bichromatic light and modest control complexity. The paper's strengths include direct characterization of the HG01 gradient profile, measurement of Bell-state fidelity via population and parity analysis, and error budgets whose simulated and experimental errors agree. The breathing-mode-mediated gate at 0.97 fidelity for chains up to six ions is a noteworthy result. However, the evidence is limited to at most six ions, and the core extrapolation to hundred-ion chains is not quantitatively substantiated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Introduction; 'Extending to longer chains'; Fig. 4] The assertion that 'The sparse axial mode spectrum enables isolation of single or few modes as entanglement mediators even in hundred-ion chains' is an unsupported extrapolation. The experimental demonstration reaches only N=6; at the same time Fig. 4b shows the axial trap frequency is reduced from 2π×0.502 MHz (N=2) to 2π×0.247 MHz (N=6) to keep ion spacing fixed, so the absolute mode frequencies decrease and the number of modes increases linearly with N. The nearest-spectator-mode spacing relative to the gate detuning δ=2π×10 kHz and to the Rabi coupling Ω=2π×1.6–2.5 kHz is not computed for any N>6, and the spectator-mode error in Table I is listed only for the three-ion COM gate. Without a normal-mode calculation of the axial spectrum for N≈10–100 at fixed nearest-neighbor spacing, the central scalability advantage asserted in the title and abstract is unverified.
  2. ['Extending to longer chains'; Table S1] The breathing-mode-mediated entangling gate is demonstrated only for the outermost pair (1,N), and the error budget in Table S1 corresponds to the three-ion chain. Because the breathing-mode displacement pattern is spatially nonuniform, it is not obvious that the same constant-amplitude bichromatic drive implements a high-fidelity XX(π/4) gate for arbitrary pairs (adjacent or interior) in longer chains. To support the claim of addressable two-qubit gates with a universal gate set, the authors should either provide data or a numerical analysis for arbitrary pairs at N>3.
  3. [Abstract; Fig. 4a] The abstract's statement 'fidelities consistently around 0.97' for chains up to six ions is not supported for the COM-mode-mediated gates shown in Fig. 4a, where the fidelity drops to 0.856(4) at N=6. The ~0.97 fidelities are attained with the breathing-mode-mediated gates. The abstract should specify this distinction, otherwise readers will infer a uniform fidelity that the data do not show.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] There are numerous typographical errors (e.g., 'decipt' in the Fig. 1 caption, 'Conventionl' and 'propoties' in the Introduction, 'breakthough' and 'anihilation' in the Setup section, 'Gassian' in Methods, 'transvesal' in the Conclusion). A thorough proofread is needed.
  2. [Methods, 'Generation of Hermitian-Gaussian mode'] The section title should be 'Generation of Hermite-Gaussian mode' to match the rest of the paper.
  3. [Fig. 3d and Fig. S1c] The horizontal axis is labeled 'Number of gates(N)', which is easily confused with the chain length N used in Fig. 4; consider using 'Number of gate applications' instead.
  4. [Fig. 2d and main text] The pulse shape notation is inconsistent: Fig. 2d says '20µs sin 2-pulse shaping at both ends' while the text says '20µs sin^2-ramp up/down'. Please standardize the notation.
  5. [Abstract] The phrase 'enabling to isolate' should be 'enabling isolation of'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the experimental derivation is self-contained and does not reduce to its inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are (i) that the transverse gradient of an HG01 beam couples qubits to axial motional modes and (ii) that this enables single-mode-mediated entangling gates without complex pulse shaping. Both claims are supported by direct experimental evidence: axial sideband spectra, ground-state cooling, Rabi oscillations, state-dependent force measurements, Bell-state populations, and parity oscillation contrasts. The error-budget simulations use independently measured or cited inputs (435 nm laser dephasing, COM-mode heating rate, 2D3/2 lifetime, gradient crosstalk, pointing fluctuation), and the simulated errors are compared with, not fitted to, the measured gate errors. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no derivation step uses its own conclusion as an input by construction. The only self-citation is Ref. [28] for the shelving-based detection scheme, but the detection fidelity is independently re-measured in this work (0.9900(6)) and the detection method is not load-bearing for the entangling-gate claim. The assertion that axial modes remain sparse enough for single-mode isolation in hundred-ion chains is an extrapolation beyond the demonstrated six-ion data and lacks a normal-mode analysis for large N; this is a correctness or scalability risk, not circularity, because the paper does not define axial sparsity in terms of the demonstrated fidelities. Overall, the experimental derivation is self-contained against external benchmarks, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim is an experimental demonstration, not a parameter-free derivation. It rests on standard laser-ion interaction theory, the device-specific approximation quality of the 0-π phase-plate mode, and an extrapolation of axial-mode sparsity to longer chains. No free parameters are fitted to enforce the fidelity results; all simulation inputs are measured or cited. No new physical entities are postulated; the 0-π mode is a known optical device output.

free parameters (1)
  • Gate detuning and gate time for COM-mode XX(pi/4) gates = delta = 2π x 10 kHz, tau_g = 120 μs
    Chosen to isolate the COM mode and set the gate angle; control settings, not fitted to enforce the fidelity result.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math The addressing beam is the ideal HG01 mode E(z) = E0 * H1(sqrt(2) z / w0) * exp(-z^2/w0^2) (Methods, Eq. 3).
    Definition of a first-order Hermite-Gaussian mode; the physical beam is an approximation produced by a 0-π phase plate, and the long-tail deviation is measured and discussed.
  • domain assumption When an ion sits at the dark slit, the qubit-motion coupling has the Mølmer-Sørensen form H = Ω_sdf σ_x (a e^{-iδt} + a† e^{iδt}).
    Standard laser-ion interaction; the gradient coupling is verified in Fig. 2c-d by profiling Ω_sdf(z).
  • domain assumption The 0-π phase-plate mode has only about 1% intrinsic gradient crosstalk at the 5.4 μm ion spacing; measured crosstalk is about 1.5%.
    Device assumption; the discrepancy between theory and measurement is acknowledged but not resolved, and crosstalk degrades adjacent-pair gates (Supplementary Fig. S1).
  • domain assumption Axial motional modes remain sparse and isolatable in long chains (hundred-ion chains, Introduction).
    Extrapolation from six-ion data; not demonstrated, and this is the load-bearing premise for the scalability claim.
  • domain assumption The dominant gate errors are laser dephasing, COM-mode heating, gradient crosstalk, and 2D3/2 lifetime, with rates as measured or cited.
    The error budget in Table I reproduces the three-ion gate error, but the six-ion COM case deviates and is attributed to imperfect cooling without direct measurement.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Scalable entangling gates on ion qubits via structured light addressing." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/77555XRS

@misc{pith2026250619535,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Scalable entangling gates on ion qubits via structured light addressing},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/77555XRS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.19535}
}
read the original abstract

A central challenge in developing practical quantum processors is maintaining low control complexity while scaling to large numbers of qubits. Trapped-ion systems excel in small-scale operations and support rapid qubit scaling via long-chain architectures. However, their performance in larger systems is hindered by spectral crowding in radial motional modes, a problem that forces reliance on intricate pulse-shaping techniques to maintain gate fidelities. Here, we overcome this challenge by developing a novel trapped-ion processor with an individual-addressing system that generates steerable Hermite-Gaussian beam arrays. The transverse gradient of these beams couples qubits selectively to sparse axial motional modes, enabling to isolate a single mode as entanglement mediator. Leveraging this capability, we demonstrate addressable two-qubit entangling gates in chains up to six ions with fidelities consistently around 0.97, achieved without complex pulse shaping. Our method significantly reduces control overhead while preserving scalability, providing a crucial advance toward practical large-scale trapped-ion quantum computing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.19535 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. a. A chain of 171Yb+ ions, with a tunable num￾ber of ions, is confined in a segmented blade trap. Un￾like the conventional scheme that encodes the hyper￾fine qubit within the ground-state manifold of a single 171Yb+ ion, we employ an optical qubit encoded in both the ground and metastable manifolds, defined as |0⟩ = 2S1/2 |F = 0, mF = 0⟩ and |1⟩ = 2D3/2 |F = 2, mF = 1⟩, with an energy gap ωq around 688 THz. This opt… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. d. Note that, phase-varied π/2-rotations are ap￾plied to all three ions to extract parity oscillations of all ion pairs, revealing crosstalk-induced entanglement with the center ion. The measured error rate for the XX1,3(π/4) operation is 0.035(1) per gate. The primary error source is dephasing of the 435 nm laser (coherence time around 3 ms), caused by residual frequency lock noise and fiber phase noise. Additional… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    0.5 1. 1.5 2. Frequency/MHz Excitation/arb. HG01 modeRadial(x-y)Axial(z) a b2P1/2 2S1/2 2D3/2 |0⟩ 435nm 370nm 171Yb+ d c Zoom Axial motional modesRadial motional modesUsing Gaussian modeUsing HG01 mode longitudinal propagating gradient Transversal profilegradient 3D[3/2]1/2 935nm C1C2 F = 1F = 2 F = 1F = 0F = 1F = 0 |0⟩ = 2S1/2|F = 0, mF = 0⟩|1⟩ =2D3/2|F ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Y. Wang, M. Um, J. Zhang, S. An, M. Lyu, J.-N. Zhang, L.-M. Duan, D. Yum, and K. Kim, Single-qubit quan- tum memory exceeding ten-minute coherence time, Nat. Photonics11, 646 (2017)

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Wang, C.-Y

    P. Wang, C.-Y. Luan, M. Qiao, M. Um, J. Zhang, Y. Wang, X. Yuan, M. Gu, J. Zhang, and K. Kim, Single ion qubit with estimated coherence time exceeding one hour, Nat. Commun.12, 233 (2021)

    2021

  4. [4]

    C. J. Ballance, T. P. Harty, N. M. Linke, M. A. Sepiol, and D. M. Lucas, High-Fidelity Quantum Logic Gates Using Trapped-Ion Hyperfine Qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 060504 (2016)

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    J. P. Gaebler, T. R. Tan, Y. Lin, Y. Wan, R. Bowler, A. C. Keith, S. Glancy, K. Coakley, E. Knill, D. Leibfried, and D. J. Wineland, High-Fidelity Universal Gate Set for 9Be + Ion Qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 060505 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Kielpinski, C

    D. Kielpinski, C. Monroe, and D. J. Wineland, Architec- ture for a large-scale ion-trap quantum computer, Nature 417, 709 (2002)

    2002

  7. [7]

    J. M. Pino, J. M. Dreiling, C. Figgatt, J. P. Gaebler, S. A. Moses, M. Allman, C. Baldwin, M. Foss-Feig, D. Hayes, K. Mayer,et al., Demonstration of the trapped-ion quan- tum ccd computer architecture, Nature592, 209 (2021)

    2021

  8. [8]

    S.-L. Zhu, C. Monroe, and L.-M. Duan, Trapped Ion Quantum Computation with Transverse Phonon Modes, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 050505 (2006)

    work page 2006

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    Guo, Y.-K

    S.-A. Guo, Y.-K. Wu, J. Ye, L. Zhang, W.-Q. Lian, R. Yao, Y. Wang, R.-Y. Yan, Y.-J. Yi, Y.-L. Xu,et al., A site-resolved two-dimensional quantum simulator with hundreds of trapped ions, Nature630, 613 (2024)

    2024

  2. [10]

    DeCross, R

    M. DeCross, R. Haghshenas, M. Liu, E. Rinaldi, J. Gray, Y. Alexeev, C. H. Baldwin, J. P. Bartolotta, M. Bohn, E. Chertkov,et al., Computational Power of Random Quantum Circuits in Arbitrary Geometries, Phys. Rev. X15, 021052 (2025)

    2025

  3. [11]

    C. D. Bruzewicz, J. Chiaverini, R. McConnell, and J. M. Sage, Trapped-ion quantum computing: Progress and challenges, Appl. Phys. Rev.6, 021314 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    R. D. Delaney, L. R. Sletten, M. J. Cich, B. Estey, M. I. Fabrikant, D. Hayes, I. M. Hoffman, J. Hostetter, C. Langer, S. A. Moses,et al., Scalable Multispecies Ion Transport in a Grid-Based Surface-Electrode Trap, Phys. Rev. X14, 041028 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    S.-L. Zhu, C. Monroe, and L.-M. Duan, Arbitrary-speed quantum gates within large ion crystals through min- imum control of laser beams, Europhys. Lett.73, 485 (2006)

    2006

  6. [14]

    T. Choi, S. Debnath, T. A. Manning, C. Figgatt, Z.-X. Gong, L.-M. Duan, and C. Monroe, Optimal Quantum Control of Multimode Couplings between Trapped Ion Qubits for Scalable Entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 190502 (2014)

    2014

  7. [15]

    P. H. Leung, K. A. Landsman, C. Figgatt, N. M. Linke, C. Monroe, and K. R. Brown, Robust 2-Qubit Gates in a Linear Ion Crystal Using a Frequency-Modulated Driving Force, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 020501 (2018)

    2018

  8. [16]

    A. R. Milne, C. L. Edmunds, C. Hempel, F. Roy, S. Mavadia, and M. J. Biercuk, Phase-Modulated Entan- gling Gates Robust to Static and Time-Varying Errors, 8 Phys. Rev. Appl.13, 024022 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    Bl¨ umel, N

    R. Bl¨ umel, N. Grzesiak, N. Pisenti, K. Wright, and Y. Nam, Power-optimal, stabilized entangling gate be- tween trapped-ion qubits, Npj Quantum Inf.7, 147 (2021)

    2021

  10. [18]

    Y. Lu, S. Zhang, K. Zhang, W. Chen, Y. Shen, J. Zhang, J.-N. Zhang, and K. Kim, Global entangling gates on arbitrary ion qubits, Nature572, 363 (2019)

    2019

  11. [19]

    Y. Lu, W. Chen, S. Zhang, K. Zhang, J. Zhang, J.-N. Zhang, and K. Kim, Implementing Arbitrary Ising Mod- els with a Trapped-Ion Quantum Processor, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 050602 (2025)

    2025

  12. [20]

    Debnath, N

    S. Debnath, N. M. Linke, C. Figgatt, K. A. Landsman, K. Wright, and C. Monroe, Demonstration of a small programmable quantum computer with atomic qubits, Nature536, 63 (2016)

    2016

  13. [21]

    Pogorelov, T

    I. Pogorelov, T. Feldker, C. D. Marciniak, L. Postler, G. Jacob, O. Krieglsteiner, V. Podlesnic, M. Meth, V. Negnevitsky, M. Stadler, B. H¨ ofer, C. W¨ achter, K. Lakhmanskiy, R. Blatt, P. Schindler, and T. Monz, Compact Ion-Trap Quantum Computing Demonstrator, PRX Quantum2, 0...

    2021

  14. [22]

    T. Monz, P. Schindler, J. T. Barreiro, M. Chwalla, D. Nigg, W. A. Coish, M. Harlander, W. H¨ ansel, M. Hen- nrich, and R. Blatt, 14-Qubit Entanglement: Creation and Coherence, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 130506 (2011)

    2011

  15. [23]

    Forbes, M

    A. Forbes, M. De Oliveira, and M. R. Dennis, Structured light, Nat. Photonics15, 253 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    Verde, C

    M. Verde, C. T. Schmiegelow, U. Poschinger, and F. Schmidt-Kaler, Trapped atoms in spatially-structured vector light fields, Sci. Rep.13, 21283 (2023)

    2023

  17. [25]

    C. T. Schmiegelow, J. Schulz, H. Kaufmann, T. Ruster, U. G. Poschinger, and F. Schmidt-Kaler, Transfer of opti- cal orbital angular momentum to a bound electron, Nat. Commun.7, 12998 (2016)

    2016

  18. [26]

    G. F. Quinteiro, F. Schmidt-Kaler, and C. T. Schmiegelow, Twisted-Light–Ion Interaction: The Role of Longitudinal Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 253203 (2017)

    2017

  19. [27]

    Stopp, M

    F. Stopp, M. Verde, M. Katz, M. Drechsler, C. T. Schmiegelow, and F. Schmidt-Kaler, Coherent Transfer of Transverse Optical Momentum to the Motion of a Sin- gle Trapped Ion, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 263603 (2022)

    2022

  20. [28]

    Olmschenk, K

    S. Olmschenk, K. C. Younge, D. L. Moehring, D. N. Mat- sukevich, P. Maunz, and C. Monroe, Manipulation and detection of a trapped Yb + hyperfine qubit, Phys. Rev. A76, 052314 (2007)

    2007

  21. [29]

    X. Mai, L. Zhang, and Y. Lu, High-Fidelity Detection on 171Yb+ Qubit via 2D3/2 Shelving, arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.18868 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    S. Kim, R. R. Mcleod, M. Saffman, and K. H. Wagner, Doppler-free, multiwavelength acousto-optic deflector for two-photon addressing arrays of rb atoms in a quantum information processor, Appl. Opt.47, 1816 (2008)

    2008

  23. [31]

    A. A. Peshkov, E. Jordan, M. Kromrey, K. K. Mehta, T. E. Mehlst¨ aubler, and A. Surzhykov, Excitation of Forbidden Electronic Transitions in Atoms by Hermite- Gaussian Modes, Ann. Phys.535, 2300204 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    Sørensen and K

    A. Sørensen and K. Mølmer, Quantum Computation with Ions in Thermal Motion, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 1971 (1999)

    1999

  25. [33]

    P. C. Haljan, K.-A. Brickman, L. Deslauriers, P. J. Lee, and C. Monroe, Spin-Dependent Forces on Trapped Ions for Phase-Stable Quantum Gates and Entangled States of Spin and Motion, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 153602 (2005)

    2005

  26. [34]

    C. A. Sackett, D. Kielpinski, B. E. King, C. Langer, V. Meyer, C. J. Myatt, M. Rowe, Q. Turchette, W. M. Itano, D. J. Wineland,et al., Experimental entanglement of four particles, Nature404, 256 (2000)

    2000

  27. [35]

    Schacht, J

    M. Schacht, J. Danielson, S. Rahaman, J. Torgerson, J. Zhang, and M. Schauer, 171Yb+ 5D3/2 hyperfine state detection and F= 2 lifetime, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.48, 065003 (2015)

    2015

  28. [36]

    C. H. Valahu, I. Apostolatos, S. Weidt, and W. K. Hensinger, Quantum control methods for robust entan- glement of trapped ions, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 55, 204003 (2022)

    2022

  29. [37]

    Orozco-Ruiz, W

    M. Orozco-Ruiz, W. Rehman, and F. Mintert, Gener- ally noise-resilient quantum gates for trapped ions, Phys. Rev. A111, 042404 (2025)

    2025

  30. [38]

    Pagano, P

    G. Pagano, P. Hess, H. Kaplan, W. Tan, P. Richerme, P. Becker, A. Kyprianidis, J. Zhang, E. Birckelbaw, M. Hernandez,et al., Cryogenic trapped-ion system for large scale quantum simulation, Quantum Sci. Technol. 4, 014004 (2018)

    2018

  31. [39]

    C.-Y. Shih, S. Motlakunta, N. Kotibhaskar, M. Sajjan, R. Habl¨ utzel, and R. Islam, Reprogrammable and high- precision holographic optical addressing of trapped ions for scalable quantum control, Npj Quantum Inf.7, 57 (2021)

    2021

  32. [40]

    Motlakunta, N

    S. Motlakunta, N. Kotibhaskar, C.-Y. Shih, A. Vogliano, D. McLaren, L. Hahn, J. Zhu, R. Habl¨ utzel, and R. Islam, Preserving a qubit during state-destroying operations on an adjacent qubit at a few micrometers distance, Nat. Commun.15, 6575 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    A. S. Sotirova, B. Sun, J. D. Leppard, A. Wang, M. Wang, A. Vazquez-Brennan, D. P. Nadlinger, S. Moser, A. Jesacher, C. He, F. Pokorny, M. J. Booth, and C. J. Ballance, Low cross-talk optical addressing of trapped-ion qubits using a novel integrated photonic chip, Light Sci. A...

    2024

  34. [42]

    Saner, O

    S. Saner, O. B˘ az˘ avan, M. Minder, P. Drmota, D. J. Webb, G. Araneda, R. Srinivas, D. M. Lucas, and C. J. Ballance, Breaking the Entangling Gate Speed Limit for Trapped-Ion Qubits Using a Phase-Stable Standing Wave, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 220601 (2023)

    2023

  35. [43]

    A. R. Vasquez, C. Mordini, C. Verni` ere, M. Stadler, M. Malinowski, C. Zhang, D. Kienzler, K. K. Mehta, and J. P. Home, Control of an Atomic Quadrupole Transition in a Phase-Stable Standing Wave, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 133201 (2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    Figgatt, A

    C. Figgatt, A. Ostrander, N. M. Linke, K. A. Landsman, D. Zhu, D. Maslov, and C. Monroe, Parallel entangling operations on a universal ion-trap quantum computer, Nature572, 368 (2019)

    2019

  37. [45]

    Y. Zhu, A. M. Green, N. H. Nguyen, C. Huerta Alderete, E. Mossman, and N. M. Linke, Pairwise-Parallel En- tangling Gates on Orthogonal Modes in a Trapped-Ion Chain, Adv. Quantum Technol.6, 2300056 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    N. R. Lee, Y. Guo, A. Y. Cleland, E. A. Wollack, R. G. Gruenke, T. Makihara, Z. Wang, T. Rajabzadeh, W. Jiang, F. M. Mayor, P. Arrangoiz-Arriola, C. J. Sara- balis, and A. H. Safavi-Naeini, Strong Dispersive Cou- pling Between a Mechanical Resonator and a Fluxo- nium Supercond...

    2023

  39. [47]

    W. Chen, Y. Lu, S. Zhang, K. Zhang, G. Huang, M. Qiao, X. Su, J. Zhang, J.-N. Zhang, L. Banchi,et al., Scalable 9 and programmable phononic network with trapped ions, Nat. Phys.19, 877 (2023)

    2023

  40. [48]

    Davoudi, N

    Z. Davoudi, N. M. Linke, and G. Pagano, Toward simu- lating quantum field theories with controlled phonon-ion dynamics: A hybrid analog-digital approach, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 043072 (2021)

    2021

  41. [49]

    Shen and L

    C. Shen and L. Duan, Correcting detection errors in quantum state engineering through data processing, New J. Phys.14, 053053 (2012). METHODS Detection scheme for optical qubit The detection scheme for the 171Yb+ optical qubit is a variant of the electronic shelving method. As...

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.